webs counters - visitors, 1st READ the synopsis of a 5 page overview
then take me to the NUTS & BOLTS OF THE EVIDENCE
Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT
Sui juris, in propria persona www.opposepredatoryguardians.com

LIVE DIARY UPDATES with website: www.opg.me
& >> www.victimsofabuseofpower.com - www.ukrefugees.com
2010 to 2012 .. Read 2013 .. Read 2014 .. Read 2015 .. Read 2016
20.8.2012 - ALL AGAINST HER 'WILL' here
31.7.2015 - RELEASE my home £20million CLAIM STONEWALLED
06.11.2015 - ORDER issued to JUDGE JACKSON
18.11.2015 - NOTICE to JUDGE PELLING
21.1.2016 - EXECUTORs OFFICE, 'occupant' issue 2 estate orders
22.2.2016 - Clarkejudgment22.2.16.pdf
11.3.2016 - letter to BRITISHCONSULATE.pdf 11.3.2016
09.3.2016 - Jackson PROPOSED order 9.3.16
15.3.2016 - RESPONSE FILED 15.3.16
11.4.2016 - statementtojackson11042016.pdf
12.4.2016 - ClarkeAnn10370284order120416.pdf
13.4.2016 - angelaletter13042016.pdf
17.4.2016 - AngKevAppStatement17042016.pdf
18.4.2016 - letter to No 10 Cameron
20.4.2016 - FILED statement & demand for grant of probate
27.4.2016 - Common law demand filed on Jackson court of 'protection'
09.5.2016 - [magistrate] peter, man, sends an order that is void
12.5.2016 - peter, mans order is defaced and returned as VOID
16.5.2016 - 1st QUEENS BENCH DIVISION damages demand ordered
16.7.2016 - 2nd QUEENS BENCH DIVISION demand/CAVEAT
02.8.2016 - 3rd filing to QBD/copied SENIOR MASTER FONTAINE
09.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may served claim for terrorism
16.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may served reminder NOTICE
20.8.2016 - woman PM theresa-mary may is served a FINAL DEMAND
20.8.2016 - served PROOF of FINAL DEMAND PM theresa-mary may
30.8.2016 - served CHANCELLOR JUSTICE SEC mary-elizabeth truss
31.8.2016 - Email received from barbara-janet fontaine
01.9.2016 - NOTICE of DEFAULT issued to PM may/fontaine/truss
02.9.2016 - DEFAULT served with proof on may/truss/fontaine
13.9.2016 - 2ndNoticeofVoidOrder13092016.pdf on may/truss/fontaine
19.9.2016 - relinquishment of corporate for profit UK PLC citizenship
21.9.2016 - CoP HEARING NOTICE re JURISDICTION 'invitation'

THURSDAY:SEPT 29 2016 Visiter No.636290 to www.opg.me

You can seriously take this new world order here as demonstration of how they want to go about controlling peoples lives by choosong what destination a person can go to or worse removal of the their passport to prevent travel at all.
On her last trip to Thailand my mother had a bout of dehydration. Dehydration you can have in the United Kingdom or Spain or anywhere else it is not just Thailand.
Because we where planned to stay for 9 months in the far east there was no provision in the short term to return to the EU early and at the time of illness needed to fly back to EU for treatment and so called on her daughter to repay some money what she had owed her own mother for 20 years a sum of £4950 but we only needed £900 in which the daughter refused any money but offered to spend £1500 for her to fly out and forcibly repatriate her mother to the UK £1500.
A video of mum in hospital refusing such repatriation without me was sent to the daughter.
Now after securing provision for our next trip to Thailand the authorities want to prevent, how sick is this new world order of masonic control!
Mum's 1st holiday destination choice might not be Thailand but faced with the corrupt UK or a daughter whom cannot be trusted she will go to Thailand.
ALL things considered the picture is very simple to paint, without masonic court corruption and respect to article 8 a private family life being active then mum would be free to stay with her relatives during our trip to Thailand if she could do this without fear that her choices will be removed ie thrown in a care home or her passport removed!
With these potential threats its impossible to have a normal family life for mum which is disturbing to the very core as its what we personally want.
Mums living will does actually cover this and her protection is their in writing but the masonic judiciary apparrently don't give a flying fuck for the wills act of 1837!!
We are dealing with TERRORISTS simple.com
I saw an article only last week in which the new world order was summed up in red lower down in this webiste as and I quote, "What appears to be happening is that TERROR is now being used by such de-facto corporate foreign governing contractors, in order to enforce corporate governance upon the people. People that question any part of the system meet face to face with a very different government than what they assumed existed. Terrorizing the masses into a submission of servitude may be effective but is it right and will it work in the long haul?.
Below here is a picture taken of mum on Pattaya beach road at a bar known as GULLIVERS can you tell? how distraught does she look to be in Thailand??

A statement was made not long after this trip to Thailand.
here dated 09.10.2010
Mum then went on to have 2 more trips to Thailand.

WEDNESDAY:SEPT 28 2016 Visiter No.636250 to www.opg.me

TUESDAY:SEPT 27 2016 Visiter No.636204 to www.opg.me

MONDAY:SEPT 26 2016 Visiter No.636176 to www.opg.me

SATURDAY:SEPT 24 2016 Visiter No.636135 to www.opg.me

sent with LIVING WILL here
Also sent with missing statements here
& a letter to David Cameron here

FRIDAY:SEPT 23 2016 Visiter No.636109 to www.opg.me

INTERIM Official solicitor report here by ALASTAIR PITBLADO
ALEXANDER RUCK KEENE 39 Essex Chambers London WC2A 1DD provides

FRIDAY:SEPT 23 2016 Visiter No.636075 to www.opg.me

The DANGER of the Truth:
When you start looking for the truth, you will confront the reality of just how corrupt and dogged our system has become, you will be subject to brutal attacks from the serpent, because, you are the real beneficiary of Eden but the Quasi Counterfeit will not let go without a fight and probably a fight to the death. Beware of these loyal DOGS of the Justinian Deception, their rich life depends on your slavery and your lack of ability to see the Justinian Deception in full swing. The Kennedy kill, the 9/11 murder of thousands of people, the causing of World War in order to sell arms and run drugs, causing massive debt and hardship at the cost of your lives and the lives of our children for nothing more than profit, these people stop at nothing to keep hidden the deception they need in order to hold such corrupt power over the right to control the treasury of the people. You will be cast as a “Terrorist” or “Sovereign Citizen” being things that make no sense legally but will be tagged to you in order to discredit your stand for the truth. Your good will is their enemy, your quest for the truth undermines their fraud and their deception. This truly is a sad situation for good people and once you become aware of how utterly corrupt and dogged the system is, you then must live with such disturbing knowledge but not having the ability and might to correct it. To make a stand for what is right may lead to nothing but humiliation and even death. I myself have now been subject to threats against the well being of myself and my children, and I fear for our well being. This document is all I have left in order to explain the dander I have faced for the research undertaken in order to discover the Grammatical Crime employed by such counterfeit deceptive corporate administrative entities passing themselves off as true common law governments of the people.
It is the fraud in the beginning that renders such a fraud to the end, such all uppercase symbolic text is only “assumed” to be the “written” fact because we, living man, have become stupid and ignorant and dumbed down to the point where we can not ever read proper English, but not really, we have been indoctrinated, programed from the day we were born, birthed into a fraud and we have never known any better. Its only when we start to feel things are wrong within our natural bodies, within our harts that some of us start to look deeper into what is causing so many people to wonder, what is wrong with our system. When you notice the rates bills, power bills, court bills, all state entities bills appear in the mail, they are not bills! they are “ACCOUNTS” they are not even domestic accounts, they are foreign accounts and its only when you claim such an account by opening such an envelope that “houses” such an account, you become the “claimant” of such a “foreign” ACCOUNT appearing within. Its only after you have claimed such an ACCOUNT appearing in the mail, does the ACCOUNT become your “bill”, why? because you agreed to “act” as the “ACCOUNT HOLDER” and why? because what you “assumed” to be your name or street, or town or your address, was in fact the foreign designation of a foreign assumed “ACCOUUNT” and by your actions relating to you opening and claiming the mail, did you become the assumed “ACCOUNT HOLDER” of such an account. The ALL UPPERCASE TEXT was not even proper English! but you were never told. ACCOUNTS are things and things are rendered in the “SIGN” language, all uppercase text. The big question is who sent you the ACCOUNT? was it your true government? or was it a private quasi “foreign” corporate “Shadow” government that we know nothing about? … (Hidden in their Dogged Deceptive Language)
ACCOUNTING is the art (Art of cunning) of conferring debt titles upon the unsuspecting. The all uppercase text is just a legal title that renders you as the trustee of such a title. You must settle the debt if you have claimed “ownership-trusteeship” over such a debt ACCOUNT.
The greatest deception that people of today refuse to believe is that “THIS TYPE OF ALL UPPER CASE TEXT IS NOT ENGLISH“, and “This type of text is English“. The great difference is that “THIS ALL UPPER CASE SYMBOLIC TYPE OF TEXT” is totally foreign to the English language and has different grammatical rules to the English language and if you are not aware of such a difference between the grammatical differences between the two languages “English” and “Ancient Latin”, (American Sign Language, Re: Article 11:147 Chicago Manual of Styles) and the difference between their different grammatical rules, you will fall for the deceptive trappings of the foreign accounts of ROME, CITY OF LONDON and the UNITED STATES FEDERAL RESERVE, (All foreign corporate accounts)… You become the Citizen of Rome, the debtor trustee of the VATICAN, you are no longer the living man with common law rights, you are the dead legal fiction, ripe for plunder by the Emperors of Rome in order to rape and plunder its own Citizens. You are no longer a Townsmen or a Countrymen or Civilian, you are a foreign “citizen” being the trustee to Rome, the world debtor… The very word “city” is an abbreviation of the: “CITY OF LONDON” being the square mile in in the middle of London.
What appears to be happening is that TERROR is now being used by such de-facto corporate foreign governing contractors, in order to enforce corporate governance upon the people. People that question any part of the system meet face to face with a very different government than what they assumed existed. Terrorizing the masses into a submission of servitude may be effective but is it right and will it work in the long haul?

THURSDAY:SEPT 22 2016 Visiter No.636070 to www.opg.me
IMPLIED CONSENT NOT GIVEN - click to enlarge

WEDNESDAY:SEPT 21 2016 Visiter No.636015 to www.opg.me

2 days ago this was filed

TUESDAY:SEPT 20 2016 Visiter No.635955 to www.opg.me

We strongly urge the State Department to reverse its decision and allow Ambassador Murray freedom of travel and freedom of expression without hindrance in the United States of America.
Why is this important?
The U.S. government, for no stated reason, and after having approved his entry in the past, has denied Craig Murray the usual approval to enter the United States without a visa that is given to UK citizens. Craig Murray was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from 2002 to 2004.
Murray was forced out of the British public service after he exposed the use of torture by Britain's Uzbek allies. Murray is scheduled to chair the presentation of this year's Sam Adams Award for Integrity in Intelligence to CIA torture whistleblower John Kiriakou, and to speak about diplomacy as an alternative to war at a World Beyond War conference planned for September 23-25 in Washington, D.C.
In 2006 Murray was himself awarded the Sam Adams Award, and the citation included the following: "Mr. Murray learned that the intelligence authorities of the UK and the U.S. were receiving and using information extracted by the most sadistic methods of torture by Uzbek authorities. He protested strongly to London, to no avail. He was forced out of the British Foreign Office, but has no regrets. There are more important things than career…Mr. Murray's light has pierced a thick cloud of denial and deception. He has set a courageous example for those officials of the 'Coalition of the Willing' who have first-hand knowledge of the inhuman practices involved in the so-called 'war on terror' but who have not yet been able to find their voice."
Shocked by the denial of approval to enter the United States without a visa, Murray stated: "I shall apply for a visa via the State Department as suggested but I must be on a list to be refused under the ESTA system, and in any event it is most unlikely to be completed before the conference."
"It is worth noting," Murray added, "that despite the highly critical things I have published about Putin, about civil liberties in Russia and the annexation of the Crimea, I have never been refused entry to Russia. The only two countries that have ever refused me entry clearance are Uzbekistan and the USA. What does that tell you?
"I have no criminal record, no connection to drugs or terrorism, have a return ticket, hotel booking and sufficient funds. I have a passport from a visa waiver country and have visited the USA frequently before during 38 years and never overstayed. The only possible grounds for this refusal of entry clearance are things I have written against neo-liberalism, attacks on civil liberties and neo-conservative foreign policy. People at the conference in Washington will now not be able to hear me speak. Plainly ideas can be dangerous. So much for the land of the free!"
The following joint statement has been signed by members of the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence listed below:
News that former British Ambassador Craig Murray has been denied entry to the United States under the regular visa waiver program is both shocking and appalling. We Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence (SAAII) had invited Craig to be Master of Ceremonies at our award ceremony honoring John Kiriakou, the CIA torture whistleblower (more details at samadamsaward.ch ), this September as part of the 'No War 2016' conference.
Now we're wondering which agency's long arms have reached out to disrupt our ceremony and to try to silence Craig.
Whatever they intend, it will be bound to backfire, since it only makes the U.S. government look like some sort of monolithic repressive apparatus out to mimic the world's worst despotic regimes. Ambassador Murray notes in his blog that Uzbekistan -- whose government apparatchiks are notorious for torturing its citizens -- is the only other country to have barred his entry. Even Russia - which Ambassador Murray criticizes freely - allows him to travel there trouble-free. What are the implications for U.S. democratic values?
We strongly urge the State Department to reverse its decision and allow Ambassador Murray freedom of travel and freedom of expression without hindrance in the United States of America.

TUESDAY:SEPT 20 2016 Visiter No.635950 to www.opg.me

MONDAY: SEPT 19 2016 Visiter No.635949 to www.opg.me

MONDAY:SEPT 19 2016 Visiter No.635944 to www.opg.me

SEPT 18 2016 Visiter No.635941 to www.opg.me

SEPT 18 2016 Visiter No.635924 to www.opg.me

SEPT 17 2016 Visiter No.635906 to www.opg.me


SEPT 16 2016 Visiter No.635885 to www.opg.me

SEPT 16 2016 Visiter No.635868 to www.opg.me

This photo taken at a friends villa & pool area in Benalmadena Spain when mums real marriage problems had started and we took time out.

SEPT 16 2016 Visiter No.635853 to www.opg.me

SEPT 15 2016 Visiter No.635830 to www.opg.me
as INTIMIDATORY HARASSMENT - full 4 pages here

SEPT 14 2016 Visiter No.635785 to www.opg.me

Top Definition. blackball. To conspire to ruin someones reputation untill they become unemployable and people refuse to associate with them.
This in principle is masonic terrorism that is the undercurrent of government running our court and justice system.
Once you have been ear-marked for treatment you start to see it filter through via revolving doors and in some cases firmly slammed shut.
Two weeks ago I had a job as a DJ compere in the SHOWBOAT Benidorm where I was fired after 2 days. It transpired that someone had contacted the owner to inform her of a DAILY MAIL article about me, one which I am trying to place before the courts of justice for printing such lies, of course in an effort to discredit, to ruin, to conspire & further to deprive access to remedy and justice. Think about it!

SEPT 13 2016 Visiter No.635750 to www.opg.me
The statement is hereby filed today here

SEPT 12 2016 Visiter No.635730 to www.opg.me
VICTIM - LEONARD LAWRENCE gets article printed

One former test pilot for BAe has effectively lost control of his life and has been put under the ‘care’ of the infamous asset stripping Court of Protection even though he is quite lucid and is fighting for compensation.

SEPT 12 2016 Visiter No.635710 to www.opg.me
FROM THE OUTSET click here and 5 minutes in


Of course, and this is increasingly apparent to all who are paying attention, the Magistrates, County Courts and High Courts are dripping in deceptive practices. The deception relies upon the people never questioning the validity of the documents that get spewed out. Fraud upon fraud upon fraud.

SEPT 11 2016 Visiter No.635700 to www.opg.me

No matter what predjudice is thrown at us, by a bias, homophobic DAIL MAIL newspaper, its water off a ducks back to us.
As we continue to care and protect mother, in her 76th year, whilst in exile from a vile and despicable UK.GOV PLC of satanic evil masonic conspiracy to defraud old ladies whilst denying access to courts for remedy.
We portray here the fact of our love that has weathered the storm of 7.5 years with our 33 year age gap intact and our pride that goes with it.. 'up yours' to the DAILY MAIL satanists - we're coming to get you.


SEPT 11 2016 Visiter No.635695 to www.opg.me
by the VATICAN since 1306

SEPT 10 2016 Visiter No.635676 to www.opg.me
The Holy See - Papal Decree of July 11, 2013

In our times, the common good is increasingly threatened by transnational organized crime, the improper use of the markets and of the economy, as well as by terrorism. It is therefore necessary for the international community to adopt adequate legal instruments to prevent and counter criminal activities, by promoting international judicial cooperation on criminal matters.
In ratifying numerous international conventions in these areas, and acting also on behalf of Vatican City State, the Holy See has constantly maintained that such agreements are effective means to prevent criminal activities that threaten human dignity, the common good and peace. With a view to renewing the Apostolic See’s commitment to cooperate to these ends, by means of this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio, I establish that: 1. The competent Judicial Authorities of Vatican City State shall also exercise penal jurisdiction over:
a) crimes committed against the security, the fundamental interests or the patrimony of the Holy See; b) crimes referred to:
- in Vatican City State Law No. VIII, of 11 July 2013, containing Supplementary Norms on Criminal Law Matters;
- in Vatican City State Law No. IX, of 11 July 2013, containing Amendments to the Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code;
when such crimes are committed by the persons referred to in paragraph 3 below, in the exercise of their functions;
c) Any other crime whose prosecution is required by an international agreement ratified by the Holy See, if the perpetrator is physically present in the territory of Vatican City State and has not been extradited.
2. The crimes referred to in paragraph 1 are to be judged pursuant to the criminal law in force in Vatican City State at the time of their commission, without prejudice to the general principles of the legal system on the temporal application of criminal laws.
3. For the purposes of Vatican criminal law, the following persons are deemed “public officials”: [former “private officials” exempt from law are now within the laws dictates and are held liable, aka “public servants”]
a) Members, officials and personnel of the various organs of the Roman Curia and of the Institutions connected to it. [world-wide corporations and all individuals in trust are corporations pursuant to their birth certificate]
b) Papal legates and diplomatic personnel of the Holy See. [The Pope governs the Church/people/trust, all the people in the Birth Trust, through the Roman Curia, the governing body of the Vatican]
c) those persons who serve as representatives, managers or directors, as well as persons who even de facto manage or exercise control over the entities [public servants] directly dependent on the Holy See [trust beneficiaries] and listed in the registry [through birth certificates] of canonical juridical persons [legal fiction represented by your birth certificate ALL CAPS NAME] kept by the Governorate of Vatican City State;
d) any other person holding an administrative or judicial mandate in the Holy See, permanent or temporary, paid or unpaid, irrespective of that person’s seniority. [all public servants] 4. The jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 comprises also the administrative liability of juridical persons arising from crimes, as regulated by Vatican City State laws. [public servants are now liable for crimes against humanity]
5. When the same matters are prosecuted in other States, the provisions in force in Vatican City State on concurrent jurisdiction shall apply.
6. The content of article 23 of Law No. CXIX of 21 November 1987, which approves the Judicial Order of Vatican City State remains in force.
This I decide and establish, anything to the contrary notwithstanding. I establish that this Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio [on his own impulse] will be promulgated by its publication in L’Osservatore Romano, entering into force on 1 September 2013. Given in Rome, at the Apostolic Palace, on 11 July 2013, the first of my Pontificate.
[Synopsis: Church = People = Trust
The Vatican created a world trust using the birth certificate to capture the value of each individual’s future productive energy. Each state, province and country in the fiat monetary system, contributes their people’s value to this world trust identified by the SS, SIN or EIN numbers (for example) maintained in the Vatican registry. Corporations worldwide (individuals became corporate fictions through their birth certificate) are connected to the Vatican through law (Vatican to Crown to BAR to laws to judge to people) and through money (Vatican birth accounts value to IMF to Treasury (Federal Reserve) to banks to people (loans) to judges (administration) and sheriffs (confiscation). Judges administer the birth trust account in court matters favouring the court and the banks, acting as the presumed “beneficiary” since they have not properly advised the “true beneficiary” of their own trust. Judges, attorneys, bankers, lawmakers, law enforcement and all public officials (servants) are now held personally liable for their confiscation of true beneficiary’s homes, cars, money and assets; false imprisonment, deception, harassment, and conversion of the true beneficiary’s trust funds.]
Importance of Motu Propria The Importance of Motu Propria by Pope Francis
According to the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia, Motu Propria in Latin stands for “of his own accord” and is the name given to an official decree by a Pope personally in his capacity and office as supreme sovereign pontiff and not in his capacity as the apostolic leader and teacher of the Universal Church. To put it more bluntly, a Motu Propria is the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accordance to its provenance, influence and structure to the Western-Roman world, over riding anything that could be issued by the United Nations, the Inner and Middle Temple, the Crown of Great Britain or any other Monarch and indeed by any head of state or body politic. If you are a member of the United Nations, or recognized by the United States or the United Kingdom or have a bank account anywhere on the planet, then a Motu Propria is the highest legal instrument, no question.
In the case of the Motu Propria issued by Pope Francis on July 11th 2013, it is an instrument of several functions and layers.
In the first instance, it may be legally construed to apply to the local matters of the administration of the Holy See.
In the second instance, the document relates to the fact that the Holy See is the underpinning to the whole global system of law, therefore anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies.
Thirdly, we see the Holy See and the Universal Church clearly separating itself from the nihilist world of the professional elite who continue, to be proven time and time again, to be criminally insane, bark raving mad and with no desire to do anything honorable until they are torn from power by anyone, anybody who cares for the law.
The age of the Roman Cult, as first formed in the 11th Century and that hijacked the Catholic Church first formed by the Carolingians in the 8th Century, then the Holly Christian Empire or Byzantine Church by the 13th Century and the world at large by the 16th Century ceased to exist around March 14th 2013 upon the election of Pope Francis.
This document issued by Pope Francis is historic on multiple levels, but most significant above all others in that it recognizes the supremacy of the Golden Rule, the same teaching ascribed to Jesus Christ and the intimate connection to the Rule of Law, that all are subject to the rule of law, no one is above the law.

SEPT 9 2016 Visiter No.635655 to www.opg.me

SEPT 9 2016 Visiter No.635650 to www.opg.me
Dave John Clapham
3 hrs ·
How the Crown Rules the World
There are two Crowns operant in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington, D.C. is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerceor British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion [today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is $300 trillion]. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.
The aforementioned Temple Bar is the juristic arm of the Crown and holds an exclusive monopoly on global legal fraud through their Bar Association franchises. The Temple Bar is comprised of four Inns of Court. They are; the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. The entry point to these closed secret societies is only to be found when one is called to their Bar.
The Bar attorneys in the United States owe their allegiance and pledge their oaths to the Crown. All Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association located at the Inns of Court of the Crown Temple.
The Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by license that bleeds Canada and Great Britain white, while the Middle Temple has license to steal from America.
To have the Declaration of Independence recognized internationally, Middle Templar King George III agreed in the Treaty of Paris of 1783 to establish the legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, referred to internally as the Crown Temple States (Colonies). States spelled with a capital letter 'S,' denotes a legal entity of the Crown. At least five Templar Bar Attorneys under solemn oath to the Crown, signed the American Declaration of Independence. This means that both parties were agents of the Crown. There is no lawful effect when a party signs as both the first and second parties. The Declaration was simply an internal memo circulating among private members of the Crown.
Most Americans believe that they own their own land, but they have merely purchased real estate by contract. Upon fulfillment of the contract, control of the land is transferred by Warranty Deed. The Warranty Deed is only a 'color of title.' Color of Title is a semblance or appearance of title, but not title in fact or in law. The Warranty Deed cannot stand against the Land Patent.
The Crown was granted Land Patents in North America by the King of England. Colonials rebelled at the usurious Crown taxes, and thus the Declaration of Independence was created to pacify the poplulace.
Another ruse used to hoodwink natural persons is by enfranchisement. Those cards in your wallet bearing your name spelled in all capital letters means that you have been enfranchised and have the status of a corporation. A 'juristic personality' has been created, and you have entered into multi-variant agreements that place you in an equity relationship with the Crown.
These invisible contracts include, birth certificates, citizenship records, employment agreements, driver's licenses and bank accounts. It is perhaps helpful to note here that contracts do not now, nor have they ever had to be stated in writing in order to be enforceable by American judges. If it is written down, it is merely a written statement of the contract.
Tax protestors and (the coming) draft resistors trying to renounce the parts of these contracts that they now disagree with will not profit by resorting to tort law (fairness) arguments as justification. Judges will reject these lines of defense as they have no bearing on contract law jurisprudence. Tort law governs grievances where no contract law is in effect.
These private agreements/contracts that bind us will always overrule the broad general clauses of the Constitution and Bill of Rights (the Constitution being essentially a renamed enactment of English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a 'bill of benefits,' conferred on us by them in anticipation of reciprocity (taxes).
Protestors and resistors will also lose their cases by boasting of citizenship status. Citizenship is another equity agreement that we have with the Crown. And this is the very juristic contract that Federal judges will use to incarcerate them. In the words of former Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, "Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements." The balance of Title 42, section 1981 of the Civil Rights Code states, " .citizens shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind"
What we view as citizenship, the Crown views as a juristic enrichment instrumentality. It also should be borne in mind that even cursory circulation or commercial use of Federal Reserve Notes effects an attachment of liability for the payment of the Crown's debt to the FED. This is measured by your taxable income.
And to facilitate future asset-stripping, the end of the 14th amendment includes a state of debt hypothecation of the United States, wherein all enfranchised persons (that's you) can be held personally liable for the Crown's debt.
The Crown views our participation in these contracts of commercial equity as being voluntary and that any gain accrued is taxable, as the gain wouldn't have been possible were in not for the Crown. They view the system of interstate banks as their own property. Any profit or gain experienced by anyone with a bank account (or loan, mortgage or credit card) carries with it - as an operation of law - the identical same full force and effect as if the Crown had created the gain.
Bank accounts fall outside the umbrella of Fourth Amendment protection because a commercial contract is in effect and the Bill of Rights cannot be held to interfere with the execution of commercial contracts. The Crown also views bank account records as their own private property, pursuant to the bank contract that each of us signed and that none of us ever read.
The rare individual who actually reads the bank contract will find that they agreed to be bound by Title 26 and under section 7202 agreed not to disseminate any fraudulent tax advice. This written contract with the Crown also acknowledges that bank notes are taxable instruments of commerce.
When we initially opened a bank account, another juristic personality was created. It is this personality (income and assets) that IRS agents are excising back to the Crown through taxation.
A lot of ink is being spilled currently over Social Security.
Possession of a Social Security Number is known in the Crown's lex as 'conclusive evidence' of our having accepted federal commercial benefits. This is another example of an equity relationship with the Crown. Presenting one's Social Security Number to an employer seals our status as taxpayers, and gives rise to liability for a reciprocal quid pro quo payment of taxes to the Crown.
Through the Social Security Number we are accepting future retirement endowment benefits. Social Security is a strange animal. If you die, your spouse gets nothing, but rather, what would have gone to you is divided (forfeited) among other premium payers who haven't died yet.
But the Crown views failure to reciprocate in any of these equity attachments as an act of defilement and will proceed against us with all due prejudice.
For a person to escape the tentacles of the Crown octopus, a thoroughgoing study of American jurisprudence is required. One would have to be deemed a 'stranger to the public trust,' forfeit all enfranchisement benefits and close all bank accounts, among other things.
Citizenship would have to be made null and forfeit and the status of 'denizen' enacted. If there are any persons extant who have passed through this fire, I would certainly appreciate hearing from them.

SEPT 8 2016 Visiter No.635636 to www.opg.me


SEPT 7 2016 Visiter No.635570 to www.opg.me

So that said we then have any member of the BAR being either or solicitor attorney or judge has his 1st duty to the court and those in BLACK ROBES running it so where is the justice and remedy in all this there is'nt.
04.09.2016 I fled the UK with my mother on Jan13 2013.. three and a half years ago.. I have been laying claim to obtain my own JURY court for my case in the UK courts but are being blocked by masonic conspiracy to deny access to justice in a protection racket... is there anything I can do European wise???? my website is www.opg.me
I've been working hard to find a Professional to assist you with your question, but sometimes finding the right Professional can take a little longer than expected.
I wonder whether you're ok with continuing to wait for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will continue my search. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you.
Thank you! Nicola
ME: I am ok to wait
We will continue to look for a Professional to assist you.
Thank you for your patience, Nicola
06.09.2016 Hello,
I apologise as we have not yet been able to find a Professional to assist you. Do you wish for me to continue to search for someone to assist you or would you like for us to close your question at this time?
Thank you for your patience, Nicola
ME:I will continue to be patient
06.09.2016 Hello,
We will continue to look for a Professional to assist you.
Thank you for your patience, Nicola
07.09.2016 Hello,
Please understand it is rare for us not to be able to find the right Professional to assist our customers. We can close this question and return your good faith deposit to the original funding source on request.
Please let me know how you wish to proceed and again I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.
I hope you will give JustAnswer a try again in the future,
ME: Thank you for trying, please now refund my money.
once you've been blackballed by the secret terrorists that run britain this is your clear route BLOCKED
We knew that they could not get anyone before we started, here is the proof, so why are they still sending legalese brush off letters, saying get legal advise in a revolving doors torture, that would drive the weak under, it's all a game. One that needs fixing.

SEPT 6 2016 Visiter No.635544 to www.opg.me

SEPT 5 2016 Visiter No.635520 to www.opg.me

SEPT 3 2016 Visiter No.635475 to www.opg.me

SEPT 3 2016 Visiter No.635433 to www.opg.me
For the very best description of what is happening to me and my mother by RACKETEERING JUDICIARY in collaboration with the BAR this 15 minute video best descibes it all to a Tee. SO if you can spare 15 minutes then educate yourself to whats coming your way too if its not STOPPED!

SEPT 2 2016 Visiter No.635415 to www.opg.me
Giving 14 days under default to take action, as regards total and utter injustice and the obvious outright prevention of justice, making a mockery of our courts in which we, are not the only ones there are many many others whom deem the denied access to Queens Bench common law courts with jury, a treasonable act of obvious freemasonic terrorism, that is the true corrupt mechanism behind the fraudulent puppet facade front, that is portrayed, that is impotent.

SEPT 1 2016 Visiter No.635353 to www.opg.me
NOTICE of DEFAULT issued to PM may/truss/fontaine

We immediately ramp up the pressure in this case by filing a default notice on the 120 million pounds debt and by issuing change of jurisdictional names from the LEGAL FICTION STRAWMAN CORPORATION to the alive on land in common law jurisdiction of small caps also demanded the cestui que vie accounts collapsed with damages demanded.

AUG 31 2016 Visiter No.635337 to www.opg.me
29 days LATER SENIOR MASTER QB responds

AUG 31 2016 Visiter No.635315 to www.opg.me
DELIVERY RECEIPT TO mary-elizabeth truss

AUG 28 2016 Visiter No.635236 to www.opg.me

AUG 27 2016 Visiter No.635199 to www.opg.me
from Dave John Clapham
In Britain, this black art of money creation has serious ramifications for the humble taxpayer. When the bankers have created their fresh air money and this ‘nothingness’ is then lent to HM Treasury in return for bonds (IOU notes), the British taxpayers then have to find the money to pay the interest on this 'nothingness'. Currently, the interest being paid by HM Treasury to the bankers amounts to £52 billion a year (that’s £1 billion a week!)....just to pay the interest on something that never actually existed in the first place! It’s absolutely insane! And it’s provably fraudulent!

from Anna von Reitz
24 August at 17:09 ·
Hello? Earth? This is Anna.... Hello? Hello? Houston, We've Got a Problem Here......
In answer to the question ---- why is the signature line on my "personal" check actually a line of micro-print endlessly repeating "authorizing signature"? Why is this hidden? Why is this necessary?
I am supposing it's the truth, biting everyone in the butt-----again.
I told everyone to look at what appears to be a signature line on what appears to be their "personal checking account" checks under high magnification.
I told them that instead of it being a line it is a line of microprint, endlessly repeating "authorizing signature" or words to that effect.
I told them that they are not the actual beneficiaries of that checking account that they believe to be their own----but instead, are only presumed to have signature authority over the funds deposited----like an account manager.
I told them that every penny they deposit in any such bank account is "deemed to be" a "donation"---- a 100% donation--- to the entity named as the actual beneficiary, which merely appears to be them, because it is expressed as their NAME in all capital letters, like this: MARTIN ROBERT SCHROEDER.
I have told them that instead of "MARTIN ROBERT SCHROEDER" representing good old Martin, down on the farm, it represents an ACCOUNT---- merely a ledger maintained under that name by the bank.
In fact, the account belongs to the bank. And the bank, being an incorporated entity, belongs to the government that chartered it. And the government being an incorporated entity owes its existence to the Holy See, which also chartered it.
This is how the government has endeavored to "interpret" your earnings as a living man or woman as "corporate income". This is how the government has been able to breach your privacy and track every penny going into your account.
It's not really your account. It's their account. Or should I say, MARTIN ROBERT SCHROEDER belongs to them---- literally.
Just like all the money you donate to HIS account, you "donated" him, too---- or rather, your Mother unwittingly donated him. She wasn't told what she was doing, but did it nonetheless. She signed away her parental rights at the hospital and made her baby a "ward of the state". He had a chance to correct that when he was eighteen, but he wasn't told about that opportunity, either.
So, he just remained a helpless little ward of the state his whole life.
You, the living man, don't have an identity in their system. You are just a nameless, faceless worker bee. Your entire function is to make honey for them.
I told you all last week about my experience going into the court to do the name change. I told you that nobody asked a word about who I was. At no time in the entire process did anyone ask to see any identification at all. It was blatantly apparent that if I wanted to call myself "Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis" I could do so and nobody would care.
Until you go to court and adopt a name, you don't have one. Your Mother gave yours away to them by mistake.
You've just been allowed to use your own name all these years. It doesn't actually belong to you.
And this is how the "government"---- which is just a privately owned corporation like Walmart--- contrives to control everything you do, lays hold to everything you own, and maintains an iron fist over your head from cradle to grave. You are a "Missing Person".
Literally. You disappeared from the Public Record when you were a few days old and so, you are literally "presumed dead, lost at sea" and all your property is "presumed" to belong to the government corporation----which belongs to the Holy See.
It's the same bogus bull crap with everything else. We haven't had an actual "Treasury" in this country since 1924. We haven't had a "Secretary of the Treasury"--- except euphemistically, either. Instead, the man in that private corporate office has been the servant and chief "Governor" sitting on the Board of the International Monetary Fund. That's his actual job. It has nothing to do with America per se.
There is no "United States Treasury", no "Treasury of the United States", no "Department of the United States Treasury"------none of that. Those are just names for subcontracting bill collection agencies, tasked to collect rents and fees and taxes from you under false pretenses. There are no functioning public offices operating under those names. These are just privately owned and operated entities functioning under old trademarks they bought-----mostly from Bill Clinton, who sold the trade and service marks of old government agencies the same way that a brand name like "Twinkies" might be acquired by a creditor in bankruptcy or as a result of a corporate merger----and used to spin off a new product merely using the "Twinkies" name.
That's what happened with Wells Fargo Bank. It no longer exists. It's just a familiar trade name. What you've really got there is a Chinese-owned securities firm operating under the trade name "Wells Fargo Bank" when it's not even a bank----just a clearing house with bank functions.
So all these years you have been a missing person-worker bee and the IMF has claimed to own everything---- your name, your bank account, your public treasury. They have claimed it as "abandoned property" just as they have declared you "civilly dead" they have "presumed" that your states of the Union are "dead" too.
First they practiced identity theft against you, and then they practiced credit fraud against you. They claimed to "represent" you and they took out loans benefiting themselves and charged your credit to the limit and beyond. Now they are in bankruptcy liquidation and they have named YOU and YOUR ASSETS as chattel property backing their debts--- fair game for their creditors to attack and make claims against.
You have one final shot at getting this right and making it stick. You have to besiege the courts and the Holy See with your complaints.
And you have to take whatever rational steps you can to reclaim your name and estate.
Otherwise, these bastards are going to pretend that everything has been "abandoned" and is free to take.
May I suggest that it is well beyond the time for you to "contact" the "members of Congress" and the Vatican and the Pope and the Heads of State running other corporations in other countries and tell them that you know what is going on and you aren't putting up with it. Whatever paper games they've played, somebody needs to hit the "Reset" button and leave you and your private and public property out of it.
There is going to be a worldwide Revolution---- not just in America. It will visit every country including Britain where this filthy "management system" has been employed against the living people.
The Holy See which owns all these government corporations is on the Hot Seat for it---- literally accused of being the Great Whore of Babylon because of it. The priests down to the local level are on the Hot Seat. The politicians are, too. The lawyers and bankers who implemented this fraud while enjoying so much respect and trust are in it up to their necks. The police? Where have they been? Asleep? And all the many, many "law enforcement" agencies you have paid good money to protect you from con men and securities fraud? Snoring, too?
What about the bankruptcy courts that have allowed this crap to go on? The "US Trustees"?
Hello? Anna to Earth? Houston, we've got a problem.... Hello? Hello? .....
Why wait for the Bank Run? Just go down today and empty YOUR accounts, sink whatever cash you have into durable goods---- coffee, toilet paper, extra cat food. Do the shopping now and beat the rush.
Those in charge of liquidating the "UNITED STATES" are also in charge of liquidating the "STATE OF WHATEVER" and "YOUR NAME IN ALL CAPS" as well.
Maybe it is time you jerked away and said---- WTF??? I'm the Priority Creditor of "MARTIN ROBERT SCHROEDER"!!! And "MARTIN R. SCHRODER", too!

AUG 27 2016 Visiter No.635180 to www.opg.me
Cestui Que Vie Act 1666
info here
London 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666. The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the sea, so lost at sea).
The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust. The state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles, he can also claim damages.
When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE
1) CEST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced setakay) common term in New Zealand and Australia
2) STRAWMAN: common term in United States of America or Canada
These are the legal entity/fiction created and owned by the Government whom created it. It is like owning a share in the Stock Market, you may own a share… but it is still a share of the Stock.
Legally, we are considered to be a fiction, a concept or idea expressed as a name, a symbol. That legal person has no consciousness; it is a juristic person, ENS LEGIS, a name/word written on a piece of paper. This traces back to 1666, London is an IndependentCityState, just like Vatican is an IndependentCityState, just like WashingtonDC is an Independent City State.
The Crown is an unincorporated association. Why unincorporated? It’s private. The temple bar is in London, every lawyer called to the “bar” swears allegiance to the temple bar. You can’t get called without swearing this allegiance.
Our only way out is to reclaim your dead entity (strawman) that the Crown created, become the executor and then collapse the called Cestui Que Vie trust and forgive yourself of your debts and then remove yourself from the admiralty law that holds you in custody.
When London burned, the subrogation of men’s and women’s rights occurred. The responsible act passed… CQV act 1666 meant all men and women of UK were declared dead and lost beyond the seas. The state took everybody and everybody’s property into trust. The state takes control until a living man or woman comes back and claims their titles by proving they are alive and claims for damages can be made.
This is why you always need representation when involved in legal matters, because you’re dead.
The legal fiction is a construct on paper, an estate in trust. When you get a bill or summons from court it is always in capital letters, similar to tomb stones in grave yards. Capital letters signify death. They are writing to the dead legal fiction. A legal fiction was created when someone informed the government that there was a new vessel in town, based upon your birth.
Birth Certificates are issued to us by the Doc. just as ships are given berth Certificates at the Dock. It’s about commerce. We come from our mothers waters. Your mother has a birth canal just like a ship. The ship moves by the sea current just as we are able to move by the currency.
All this information relates to how the general public are still legally tied through Maritime Admiralty Law. Through this ancient legal construct we can be easily controlled and duped. Learning about your legal fiction helps you to unlock yourself. Otherwise you are just an empty vessel floating on the sea of commerce. Parents are tricked into registering the birth of their babies.
In about 1837 the Births, Deaths and Marriages act was formed in UK and the post of registrar general was established. His job was to collect all the data from the churches which held the records of birth.
Regis – from Queen or Crown. All people are seen to be in custody of,” The Crown”. This allows people to function in commerce and to accept the benefits provided by state. We have to understand who we are as men and women and how we can relate in the system. The City of London is a centre for markets, where merchants work. Then there is Mercantile Law. It comes from Admiralty Law. Look at the symbols in your City Courts that relate to Admiralty.
So where you have commerce and money, you also have “justice” and “injury”. You need to understand the bankruptcy before you can understand the judiciary. We have accepted the claim to accept the summons, yet ONLY the dead can be summoned. There is an obligation to accept any liability which has been created.
We are operating in Admiralty. A not guilty plea, or ANY plea admits jurisdiction. The strawman, aka legal fiction is always guilty. Barristers and solicitors make a living out of creating controversy. By creating a controversy you become liable for the case.
Honour and dishonour. To remain in honour you have to accept a claim and settle (discharge) it. Then you add conditions, ie. “I accept on proof of claim and proof of loss”. This gives the liability back to them. The legal fiction is always guilty. Only in the High Court, can the real man or woman appear. Games are played on courts, hence the name ‘court’. It is a game with actors (acting on acts). It has to be treated as a game and just business. Court room dramas are misinformation.
In the public, we are operating in bankruptcy and you receive benefits. It takes a lot of time, effort and study to understand and use these tools. You have to be prepared to go fully through the process, get the right tool out of your toolbox at the right time.
People need to learn how to act as a creation of God rather than a creation of Man.
Rights Suspension and Corruption
Cestui Que Vie Trust
Canon 2036
A Cestui Que VieTrust, also known later as a “Fide Commissary Trust” and later again as a “Foreign Situs trust” and also known as a form of “Secret Trust”is a fictional concept being a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of one or more Persons presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be formed were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages and private companies.
Canon 2037
The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void. A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted “life” expectancy of the estate.
Canon 2038
A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust. When a Beneficiary loses directbenefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in Cestui Que (Vie) Trust on their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust and are only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust choose to provide them.
Canon 2039
As all Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created on one or more presumptions based on its original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if none of these presumptions can be proven to exist.
Canon 2040
The Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words e+statuo literallymeaning “by virtue of decree, statute or judgment”. However, as the Estate is held in a Temporary not permanentTrust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneficiary is entitled only to equitable title and the use of the Property, rather than legal title and therefore ownership of the Property. Only the Corporation, also known as Body Corporate, Estate andTrust Corpus of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust possesses valid legal personality.
Canon 2041
The Property of any Estate created through a Temporary (Testamentary) Trust may be regarded as under “Cestui Que Use” by the Corporate Person, even if another name or description is used to define the type of trust or use. Therefore “Cestui Que Use is not a Person but a Right and therefore a form of “property“.
Canon 2042
In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type estate with the Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by European private banker families.
Canon 2043
Since 1581, there has been a second series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of “persons” and rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:
(i) In 1651 the Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1651-52 which introduced the concept of “settlements”, enemies of the state and restrictions of movement in states of “emeregency”; and
(ii) In 1861 the Emergency Powers Act 1861; and
(iii) In 1931 the Emergency Relief and Construction Act 1931-32; and
(iv) in 2001 the Patriot Act 2001.
Canon 2044
Since 1591, there has been a third series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of “soul” and ecclesiastical rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:
(i) In 1661 the Act of Settlement 1661-62; and
(ii) In 1871 the District of Columbia Act 1871; and
(iii) In 1941 the Lend Lease Act 1941.
Canon 2045
By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the Cestui Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming “private trusts” or “Fide Commissary Trusts” administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered “Secret Trusts” whose existence does not need to be divulged.
Canon 2046
From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States became effectively “enemies of the state” and “aliens” which in turn converted the “Fide Commissary” private secret trusts to “Foreign Situs” (Private International) Trusts.
Canon 2047
In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the global Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trustsystem was implemented from 1933 onwards.
Canon 2048
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the child forever any rights of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
Canon 2049
Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie) Trust in the formof a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the childany rights as an owner of Real Property.
Canon 2050
Since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and willinglyclaim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.
Canon 2051
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims ofproperty of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society and as Executors and Administrators.
Canon 2052
The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Bar Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trustof Baptism.
Canon 2053
The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of these secret trusts.
Canon 2054
As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoingbankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used.
Canon 2055
While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a holder of their own title.
Canon 2056
Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trustbased on such false presumptions ceases to have any property.
Canon 2057
Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.

Anna von Reitz
Time to Write Your Letters to the Pope and United Nations Secretary General. Here's a Copy of Mine.
It may not help, but at least put it on the record. Paste it on Facebook, email it, keep your receipts. Give them no plausible deniability for their acts or inactions. Do your duty to inform.
August 26, 2016
His Holiness, Pope Francis via RE 152 242 035 US c/o The Apostolic Palace
Vatican City State 00120
Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon via RE 152 242 044 US
United Nations Secretariat
New York, NY 10017
Your Holiness, Your Excellency---
The time has come to be honest with the world and with the people in it.
The old British Empire was rotten to the core. It used press-ganging, enslavement, and inland piracy --- otherwise known as "colonialism"--- to cheat the entire world.
In the wake of World War II, the United Nations was established to keep the peace and the Trusteeship Council was established to end colonialism, and to an extent, it has succeeded while ignoring the very much larger problem of continued British colonialism in the UK, Canada, Australia, the US, South Africa, New Zealand, and even mainland Europe where most countries have been severely impacted.
The very short history in the United States is instructive and parallels similar developments and practices throughout the world.
We were coerced into a misrepresented war (Step One) known as the American Civil War (1861-1865) and our government was overthrown (Step Two) and surreptitiously replaced by a government services corporation (Step Three) owned and operated by the Roman Catholic Church and calling itself The United States of America. (Step 4). This was a "private religious non-profit service corporation".
In 1907, the move began to sell off The United States of America, Inc., to an international banking cartel known euphemistically as a the Federal Reserve. This organization took over, very subtly renamed the governmental services corporation --- changing it from "The United States of America" to "the" United States of America (Incorporated)--- and spun off the Federal Reserve System establishing an all-powerful Central Bank (Step 5).
The Federal Reserve set up a fiat money system which among other things forced "US Citizens" to use commercial debt notes instead of real money. They could side-step the actual Constitution of this country because "US Citizens" were never protected by the Constitution.
This confusion between the "US Citizens" who were British Subjects and the actual Americans who are nationals of the fifty American States would later be milked under conditions of duress, extortion, and non-disclosure to create false claims in commerce against the 50 States of America and the American People.
The same or similar practices were employed by the IMF.
This fraud scheme proved so profitable that it was soon deployed worldwide. Instead of England, Ireland, and Scotland, we suddenly had the UK. Instead of Germany, France, and Italy, we had the EU. Instead of Canada, we had CANADA. And so it went around the Brave New World.
The con-artists simply drummed up new names for entire nations, forced fiat currencies down our throats, and proceeded to steal title to everything of value in sight by fraud. (Step 6).
In America, because "US Citizens" were not protected by the Constitution, an all-out effort was made to redefine everyone as a "US Citizen"---- the better to coerce us and plunder our assets. (Step 7).
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, acting as the CEO of the private, mostly foreign-owned "United States of America, Inc." had his franchise managers operating "state of States" ----- "State of Washington" for example--- pledge the "good faith and credit" of their "states and the people thereof" as sureties for the debts of the bankrupt "United States of America, Inc."
He also gratuitously redefined the Trade Names of millions of Americans to be the names of Foreign Situs Trusts, owned and operated by the bankrupt United States of America, Inc., and standing as sureties for its debts.
Thus, the perpetrators endeavored and succeeded in stealing the identity and high-jacking the credit of our entire nation.
For the next 66 years, Americans paid for the debts of the United States of America, Inc. out of one pocket, and paid for the "services" of the IMF sponsored UNITED STATES, INC. out of the other.
When the bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. finally settled in 1999, the international Trustees responsible should have released and re-conveyed the names and proper titles owed to the American States and the American People back to us. Instead, they left everything adrift in the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, and our Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways, the Queen of England, sat on her duff and did nothing.
Our Honorable Trade Names which are and always were our private property, have been labeled "disregarded entities". This is your big wake up call from the Disregarded Entities---- the modern day victims of Commercial Colonialism--- and the greatest fraud and breach of trust violation in world history.
As we write, the Second Round of this fraud scheme is ticking down. The IMF-sponsored UNITED STATES, INC., pulled its own version of the scam by creating Cestui Que Vie Trusts named after each and every "Missing American", creating bogus titles to our assets including our labor and our land, and using this mechanism as a means of borrowing against our assets---all unknown to us.
Having hijacked our credit----again----they have charged our credit cards into the stratosphere, paid no debts, and partied down since 1944 on our ticket, all without the trusting Americans ever realizing or being told what was going on.
And now, because of their utter, reprehensible irresponsibility and criminality, the UNITED STATES, INC. and all its purported "franchises" are not only bankrupt, they've been forced into liquidation.
Which brings us to the Main Topic of this letter. Yesterday, we received word that Mr. Obama is preparing to declare "Martial Law". We are wondering how he can propose to do this, since the "United States" has been at constant war and operating under martial law since 1863?
Also yesterday, we received word that over 6000 innocent American Homeowners have received "tax bills" often greater than the value of their homes along with eviction and sale notices.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. The UNITED STATES, INC., sponsored by the IMF is under liquidation. So they are having their corporate franchises---- the STATE OF MAINE and STATE OF FLORIDA---- bill the Cestui Que Vie Trusts they created and named after the living Americans.
The Sin of Omission of the "US Trustees" who failed to re-convey our Names and our Property back to the land jurisdiction has resulted in this situation and we know exactly who those Trustees are. So do you.
All these "tax bills" are being presented in DOG-LATIN and are utterly fraudulent on their face----yet the IMF and its minions are clearly preparing to use armed force and legal pretense to seize the property of innocent Americans.
Let's make this very clear---except for the nineteen enumerated services our States contracted to receive---none of these expenses charged off against these bogus ESTATE trusts are ours. Neither are we "United States Citizens" nor "citizens of the United States". We, Americans, are the victims of gross Breach of Trust and mischaracterization and identity theft and fraud---but we are not alone.
The same basic conditions have been set up in the UK, EU, Canada, Mexico, Australia, and other countries around the world.
The IMF is a French Corporation. The French Government is responsible for oversight of its activities----including its criminality in this matter.
We, the American People, are all owed the protections of the actual Constitution for the united States of America and are owed the re-conveyance of our good names and the return of our property titles and interests from our international Trustees---- the Pope in the Air Jurisdiction and the Queen of England who is our Trustee on the High Seas and Inland Waterways.
It is well-known and proven already that Americans have been falsely claimed to be "United States Citizens" and that all these acts of systemic fraud have taken place. The Curia has already declared that we are tax exempt and our vessels in commerce are tax prepaid. Trillions of dollars are sitting in our ACCOUNTS as credit and these "Prepaid" tax bills are purposefully not being paid so as to excuse the seizure of our land and our other assets.
Since the French Government chartered the IMF, the French Government is responsible for its operations--- including this ongoing deliberate mismanagement and criminality against Americans.
Pope Francis, we have returned to our land jurisdiction and it is past time to balance the books--- or pull the IMF Charter and leave it with no basis for doing business, no funds and no ability to continue presenting bogus "tax bills", harassing innocent people or paying for commercial armies operating under color of law as "government" agencies.
Secretary Ban Ki-Moon, if you value your mission of keeping world peace, we suggest that you encourage and assist Pope Francis to do the right thing and apply appropriate pressure to the Obama Administration and whatever comes after it, to respect the Will of the American People in this matter, and to seek the cooperation of the French Government.
We have already named new federal contractors to take over the role of providing us with essential governmental services in international jurisdiction and we have properly organized our counties and states to receive back our funding and resume proper operation of our nation-states. We have more than a million Federal Marshals trained and sworn in to provide for peace keeping, with more coming on board every day.
There can be no excuse for allowing the IMF or any of its bankruptcy liquidation operations related to the UNITED STATES, INC. to continue under these false pretenses on our shores.
The bill collectors must be advised of the fraud against Americans and told to cease and desist their false presumptions and fraudulent billing practices. What we owe, we have offered to pay and have instructed our Trustees to pay. The rest of the odious debt racked up by the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES, STATES OF STATES, and JOSEPH QUINCY PUBLIC stands repudiated as fraud.
You are both fully advised that vast numbers of Americans have been deliberately and non-consensually press-ganged and mischaracterized as "US Citizens" in order to promote fraud against them and their material interests. This was attempted by the perpetrators of the 14th Amendment to the corporate constitution known as The Constitution of the United States of America. It was attempted by FDR via means of identity theft and commercial fraud. And now it is being attempted again by the IMF dba "UNITED STATES".
Enough is enough.
The assets held under color of law must be returned to the Americans. Our Trade Names must be re-conveyed to the land jurisdiction en masse, just as we were originally illegally press-ganged off the land. The assets held under title and color of law in these bogus ACCOUNTS must be returned to the people and the States of America without further obfuscation or delay.
This situation is the result of mismanagement, mischaracterization, and Breach of Trust on the part of the British Monarch, former Popes, and the French Government which has failed to maintain oversight on the IMF and its operations.
It is not the fault of the peaceful, trusting, hard-working American People who have been the victims of all this international corporate fraud.
Most Sincerely,
Anna Maria Riezinger, all rights reserved. c/o Post Office Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
(907) 250-5087

AUG 26 2016 Visiter No.635165 to www.opg.me
as mary-elizabeth truss NOT DEAD @ SEA

AUG 26 2016 Visiter No.635162 to www.opg.me

AUG 25 2016 Visiter No.635133 to www.opg.me

AUG 25 2016 Visiter No.635130 to www.opg.me

and the complaint to MINISTER DAMIAN GREEN here via the freedom of information site.
The carer of 20 years cannot receive care allowance whilst abroad but yet mother can receive her dissability allowance and so the carer is then forced to live from the dissability allowance or the pension so he can eat! The care allowance was stopped on the 11th April 2016 which to todays date I am owed £1000. So when the only income that the carer has is gone how does the carer pay for his food etc???? There is only one way... and that is to use the disabled persons dissability or their pension! The caller, HELEN said that when abroad the carer is treated as a sickness benefit when the carer is clearly NOT sick as he is required under their rules to complete 35 hours care per week and in reality I do 85 hours of care so can anyone even begin to understand this??? Again all linked to the same fraud and corruption in my mothers case that the governmental satanic masonic evil conspires across departments to ATTACK.
letter/bill £10k from carers allowance here
FOI request answer from DWP here

AUG 24 2016 Visiter No.635091 to www.opg.me

LIVING BY THE RULE OF LAW 2011 by Roger Hayes
This author is not opposed to ‘statutes’ per se – he is opposed to the abuse of the use of statutes which has reached staggering proportions. Statutes are now used to override and nullify our laws and put power in the hands of the governing elite… but only because we allow it. Our freedoms are our right – but we must be prepared to defend them when they are being snatched from us from right under our noses.


AUG 23 2016 Visiter No.635025 to www.opg.me

AUG 22 2016 Visiter No.634982 to www.opg.me

To Remove all “legal” jurisdiction of all fictional authorities simply stop using a legal name that is owned by the Crown.
Stop playing in Crown courts there is no remedy for the living in those places, they serve only the Crown and its’ parasitical minions, you are effectively giving your life energies to dead fictional con-structs, you are being conned.
Using a Crown copyrighted name that appears on any birth certificate without express permission from the Crown is fraud, you will pay and keep on paying as long as you break that law.
All ID is false it cannot truly define the sentient, ID serves one purpose – control over the holder/claimant.
Are you aware of how easy it is to purchase any birth certificate other than the one you think is yours and obtain valid Crown ID with the aid of that birth certificate?
Does that not strike you as rather a large security breach in what you think is uniquely your property?
Do you have original copyright on what you have been taught is your name? No but the Crown does! Do you have express written permission to autonomously use a name that appears on a birth certificate? NO!
Change your name to reclaim it on the land
here are the UK instructions to Queens bench
Every ID is fake, constructive figments of imagination, especially Crown IDs, only you can truly identify who you are, theirs are also “not real” they are simply ideas written on paper, copyright intellectual property created by agents of the Crown, figments of the imaginings of those that obsessed in the fictional laws of man, the underlying delusional suggestion is that they are capable of creating a real human body and its’ consciousness when all they are capable of creating is an inanimate “body of works” a written record in a book.
You discarded your true self and gave up control of your consciousness when you claimed an ID from the Crown, claiming an identity from the Crown, your body and mind become as paper property of the Crown, “owned” by way of your own actions and unwitting ignorant consent to laws of “man”, wherein “ignorance of the law does not constitute an acceptable defense”.
All Crown paper property is subject to Crown copyright and jurisdiction, Using a “legal” name dictates that you are a consenting servant to those of diminished morality, those who revel in and profit through death and misery , stop pretending to be a paper person! The benefit is real life as opposed to slavery and death.

AUG 21 2016 Visiter No.634966 to www.opg.me
today by email

Queens Bench here

AUG 21 2016 Visiter No.634965 to www.opg.me

AUG 20 2016 Visiter No.634940 to www.opg.me

written story here

AUG 20 2016 Visiter No.634935 to www.opg.me
i, a man and my rights

AUG 20 2016 Visiter No.634924 to www.opg.me

AUG 19 2016 Visiter No.634916 to www.opg.me

AUG 19 2016 Visiter No.634903 to www.opg.me
SERVICE DATE 20.8.2016

AUG 18 2016 Visiter No.634903 to www.opg.me

AUG 17 2016 Visiter No.634803 to www.opg.me

This year Michael Gove was wrote to and NO reply came back, these public servants are routinely committing misconduct in a public office by ignoring what they have been put there and paid by the Public to do.

AUG 17 2016 Visiter No.634802 to www.opg.me

We aint got the time to play silly games, my mums time is running out, being disabled and 76. What heartless bastard would want to play games on a 76 yr olds life?

AUG 16 2016 Visiter No.634769 to www.opg.me
No 10 Downing ST receives NOTICE


but we may have to give 7 days extra

AUG 16 2016 Visiter No.634739 to www.opg.me

AUG 16 2016 Visiter No.634735 to www.opg.me
Check it out

AUG 15 2016 Visiter No.634699 to www.opg.me

AUG 15 2016 Visiter No.634685 to www.opg.me

or here for the article in todays paper
and so the crap continues SO MUCH for the help of John Hemming and others re justice for families... When will Kathy get to have a normal life with her grand daughter THERE is NO JUSTICE end of in the statute world of corruption where not just grand daughters are becoming prisoners of the state so are pensioners and carers!

AUG 15 2016 Visiter No.634660 to www.opg.me
upon theresa-mary may the alive woman

AUG 14 2016 Visiter No.634655 to www.opg.me

AUG 13 2016 Visiter No.634651 to www.opg.me

AUG 12 2016 Visiter No.634585 to www.opg.me

Setting the stage for Michael Larsen’s collection of personal accounts of escalating crimes against the elderly in probate courts, one typical story from the reference manual, GUARDIANSHIP, describes the techniques probate judges, attorneys and predatory guardians use to plunder the wealth of the elderly, destroying their remaining years

AUG 11 2016 Visiter No.634552 to www.opg.me

AUG 10 2016 Visiter No.634505 to www.opg.me
After a "trial" lasting several days, Grandma B's carer was convicted of possession of indecent images.
This "trial" is regarded as a blatant breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998.
Peter continues to vigorously deny these accusations, as he has all of the twenty or more sets of false allegations made against him in the past nine years. His trial barrister, Patrick Duffy of 23 Essex Street Chambers, London, described the trial as "bizarre" and maintains the jury "got it wrong". This has not stopped hostile coverage of the case in the mainstream press, which contrasts with the more favourable comments in the alternative media.
The possibility of going to appeal is now being considered.
Despite having served longer in jail than the sentence he was given, Peter remains in custody. He is now awaiting extradition to Austria, where he faces detention in a mental institution despite the fact that a psychiatrist has confirmed the obvious - that Peter is perfectly sane.
This is how whistle-blowers are silenced in the EUSSR.
Peter's defence was badly handicapped by what is considered to be wilful negligence by his solicitor Karen Todner of Kaim Todner (ONE legal Group), London. She failed to get the case trial ready for the trial due in January 2016. It was not trial ready in July 2016 either. Ms Todner ignored Peter's instructions to call certain witnesses, who would have been able to testify that the indecent images were planted. She also withheld crucial documentary evidence from the trial barrister.
Grandma B remains a captive of York Social Services at an undisclosed location. Her friends are being denied contact with her. At 87 years old, Grandma B is a disappeared person. Her jailers, due to wilful neglect, have crippled her.
A "gagging order" has been issued in an attempt to force Peter to shut down his mother's blog on:
The cost to the taxpayer of trying to silence Peter and discredit his exposure of official corruption in North Yorkshire is believed to amount to well over £1million.
Such is life in Brave New Britain, which is run by criminals in the police, social services, judiciary, government and political parties.
Their victims get jailed on fabricated evidence if they dare to complain.
letter from Peter

AUG 9 2016 Visiter No.634476 to www.opg.me
PUPPET PRIMINISTER as a wo/man, served CLAIM
for harbouring terrorist FREEMASONS under unelected puppet PM

AUG 9 2016 Visiter No.634473 to www.opg.me
Anna von Reitz
Yesterday at 17:51 ·
Holy Crap Corporations
Yesterday I had the odd pleasure and distinction of finally knowing what the all capital names convention used in court cases is all about, what it is, how it works, how it is misused by unscrupulous courts and lawyers--- all of it finally came out of the closet.
We now know that what appear to be names simply written in all capital letters like this: DAVID MICHAEL DOE are actually not names, but signs written in a debased form of Ancient Latin called “DOG-LATIN”, or “GLOSSA” or “American Sign Language”.
We know that these signs which appear to be names are actually ACCOUNTS belonging to the Vatican. These ACCOUNTS are held as split titles to incorporated entities, with the Holy See holding equitable title in behalf of the Devil and the legal title left hanging in the wind, available for anyone to claim.
So when you see this “thing” that appears to be your name on a letter addressed to your mailing address you naturally assume that it is yours, when in fact, it should be addressed to the miscreant Holy See.
After all, they are getting the benefit of the ACCOUNT and expecting you to do all the work related to it, including coming up with the funds to pay the bill for their ACCOUNT. They should be the ones sitting in the docket with their checkbooks ready.
This then, and your ignorant willingness to be identified as the party responsible for this “THING”, is at the heart of what is going on in these fake courts. It’s all deliberate fraud, designed to give an “appearance of justice” while “practicing” but not actually executing either law or justice.
All these attorneys are functioning as the Pontiff’s bill collectors and ACCOUNT managers, just like the IRS is functioning as his modern day Inquisition, still collecting “Peter’s Pence” and your “Confession” every April 15th.
How does it feel to be managed by crooks and to have the Roman Catholic Church fronting for all this?
Don’t tell me that the Popes, both Benedict XVI and Francis, don’t know the ins and outs of this scheme. They would have to know. It’s been going on since 1250 A.D. They’ve been on Notice and Demand for eight years to correct operations directly related to this central fraud----these Vatican ACCOUNTS.
So far as I can see, Benedict acted in good faith to correct the situation, but the most constructive action Francis has taken to stop this criminality, his First Apostolic Letter, has merely been a defensive action to cover their own butts.
Now the whole crap wad has been discovered and the closet door has burst open and it is all rolling like a brown wave down the Palatine Hills…. It’s the Roman Cult embedded like a tumor in the Church that has caused all this misery and graft and oppression of humanity, plus Loyola’s perverse dream of creating God’s Kingdom on Earth by force of arms.
Apparently, Loyola never observed the fact that God gave each of us freewill for a reason.
Oh, I am tired, folks, and world-weary. I’ve grown old contesting with this Beast, shadow-boxing it, tracking it, negotiating with it, hearing its vain confessions. It’s time for everyone to wake up, especially the Archbishops and the Jesuits.
The actual beneficiaries of the Vatican ACCOUNTS are here and seeking settlement.

AUG 9 2016 Visiter No.634462 to www.opg.me

AUG 8 2016 Visiter No.634430 to www.opg.me
FILED ON NO 10 theresa-mary may

10 pages being delivered tomorrow upon my mothers 76th birthday

AUG 6 2016 Visiter No.634379 to www.opg.me

AUG 5 2016 Visiter No.634360 to www.opg.me

AUG 5 2016 Visiter No.634346 to www.opg.me

AUG 5 2016 Visiter No.634334 to www.opg.me
here we come


AUG 4 2016 Visiter No.634300 to www.opg.me

RECLAIM THE NAME - stop the fraud

AUG 2 2016 Visiter No.634256 to www.opg.me
also recieves 3rd copy of recorded CLAIM


AUG 2 2016 Visiter No.634255 to www.opg.me
RECEIVES the 3rd recorded delivery CLAIM


AUG 2 2016 Visiter No.634223 to www.opg.me

AUG 2 2016 Visiter No.634220 to www.opg.me
Thanks Tom Crawford for this, can't find fault in thus anywhere. Can any of my friends on here let me know if you agree?
Hi all,
This is to bring you all up to date with a fantastic meeting that took place in Nottingham Sunday the 31st of July 2016.
For all those that missed the meeting it was a new point in British history I believe. It was confirmed by all present that THE RULE OF LAW! Must be returned to this country.
There were eminent speakers at the meeting with a wealth of knowledge who gave their opinions on the criminal cartels operating today in Britain.
It was agreed that we will no longer stand by while criminal elements in the government, judiciary and financial institutions pillage and rape our people with impunity.
This was what we discussed at the meeting and I believe the time is now right and our aims achievable when we all come together as one.
What Rule of Law stands for:
Rule of Law declares, that ALL are equal before the Law without fear or favour and that the achievement of justice and fairness must always be of supreme importance.
Rule of Law will always seek out the provable truth wherever it takes us.
Rule of Law recognises that Magna Carta 1215 (The Great Charter), along with the Declaration of Right 1689, as being the lawful foundation of the British Constitution and – as they are both peace treaties between the monarch and his people - they take complete precedence over any Statutes, Acts or Regulations passed by Parliament.
Rule of Law therefore demands:
• That Trial by Jury Common Law jurisdiction applies to ALL aspects of the British judicial system – this includes the restoration of Grand Juries to replace the Magistrates Courts and an end to County and Family Courts where judges have unlawfully taken it upon themselves to act as both judge and jury.
• That Trial by Jury Common Law jurisdiction is supreme and is the only jurisdiction allowed in the United Kingdom.
• That Juries be made fully aware of their power to use the proven process of Annulment by Jury to strike off any unjust Statutes, Acts or Regulations passed by Parliament - the ultimate protection against the imposition of tyranny.
• That the Middle Temple, the Law Society and the British legal system as a whole be made more accountable, transparent and completely free from the criminal influences of the City of London and its private banking and financial system.
• That properties, monies and other forfeitures carried out by Courts using fraudulent means on behalf of the private banking and financial sector be returned with immediate effect to their rightful owners.
• An immediate end to the City of London’s special privileges, including the position of City Remembrancer in the House of Commons.
• The Common Law Prohibition of all forms of usury.
• The immediate restoration of the Bradbury Pound so that the British people benefit from debt-free and interest-free money that is created and issued by HM Treasury using a network of local and regional public banks – money that is solely based on the United Kingdom’s wealth and potential so as to provide the liquidity needed for a happy, secure and prosperous nation. PTO
• That the Bank of England ends, with immediate effect, its relationship with the Bank for International Settlements and its fraudulent central banking system.
• That the Bank of England be fully absorbed into HM Treasury and thereby come under the full control of our elected Parliament.
• That Glass Steagall be implemented with immediate effect – that is the separation of high street banking from the riskier investment banking.
• An immediate investigation into how people’s mortgages are fraudulently created by the banking and financial industry.
• An immediate end to Student Fees and Student Debt courtesy of the reintroduction debt-free Bradbury Pound.
• That political parties per se be discouraged in favour of having elected independent Members of Parliament. Also an ending to the so-called ‘whipping system’ whereby Members of Parliament are bullied and coerced into voting in a particular way against their better judgement and conscience.
• A ban on all organised ‘behind the scenes’ political lobbying by large and powerful vested interests.
• The immediate shutting down of the leadership training charity Common Purpose along with other bogus charities which are unlawfully and treasonously undermining the well-being of the United Kingdom as a whole.
• That the Police Constabularies in the United Kingdom act, at all times, under the Common Law and that all serving constables are knowledgeable and fully conversant with the duties expected of them under the Common Law and the over-riding precedence of the Common Law.
• That using the Common Law, an immediate withdrawal from the European Union is achieved by repealing the European Communities Act of 1972 which was signed by the use of provable fraud and deception.
• An immediate public and thorough Common Law investigation into Establishment-led and institutional child abuse and paedophile rings.
• An immediate end to the criminal process of Globalization by the secretive, unelected and unaccountable international banking and financial elite.

AUG 1 2016 Visiter No.634195 to www.opg.me
'Pecking Order under Common Law that ALL magistrates/police/man/woman take their 'Oath of Office':
1. God/Trial By Jury, the jury members are the only true 'judges' in law!!
2. alive living soul man/woman the 'public Masters' with automatic tax exemptions status in law, see Black's Law Dictionary on capitalisation of names, the 'alive man/woman in law use all lower case letters for christian/surnames, who in fact use 'appellations' for names'!! the 'alive living soul man/woman in law have born with unalienable rights that can never be taken away in law!!' the 'alive man/woman in law have and use 'live born records', not the Birth Certificates for dead debt slaves in law. ships 'birth/berth', alive man/woman are 'born'. 'we, alive man/woman in law' are unlawfully being given 'Birth Certificates' because we are unlawfully being put under the law of the sea, high seas, Admiralty/Piracy law for 'ships' when we are 'alive man/woman in law'!! reminder: in a 'courtroom all parts of a courtroom are names from a ship!!'.
3. magistrates man/woman all public servants below their 'public Masters, the general public alive man/woman at Position Two in law'.
4. court clerks man/woman, again below 'alive man/woman their 'public Masters' at Position Two in law'.
5./6. defendants/plaintiffs known as the 'dead in law, dead debt slaves who unknowingly are being forced to back-up the world's currency using the work-force man/woman as slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations, after our government man/woman in 1930 stole all the gold/silver previously propping-up the world's currency, and bringing out 'Birth Certificates to unlawfully use the "alive man/woman at Position Two in law" as the workforce dead debt slaves propping-up unbeknowingly the world's currency using slavery and floating them too, alive man/woman, on Stock Exchange too as a commodity to be bought and sold on the Stock Exchange, thereby encouraging and condoning slavery, which was and is unlawfully never been abolished!!' see, Cestui Que Vie Act on government website, also Cestui Que Vie Trust Funds for 'alive man/woman' being unlawfully stolen and raided by all our government man/woman staff employed public servants deliberately doing wrongdoings to their 'alive man/woman public Masters in law'. 'all dead man/woman in law' coming under the 'dead in law, under Admiralty/Piracy law, law of the sea, high seas! when we are most definitely on land and law of the land Common Law lawfully stands and is the highest law there is and should be in operation, but unlawfully is not!! all our government floated on the Stock Exchange run for profit businesses no different to Tesco the Grocery retailer, our government man/woman unlawfully never having put these facts to the public man/woman vote!! the 'dead man/woman in law are the only one's who pay taxes and are even taxed in death with Probate Taxes!!'. the 'dead man/woman in law' see Black's Law Dictionary on capitalisation of names, is denoted by using 'capital letters in all its forms for the victims man/woman christian/surnames who are unlawfully being used as slaves to prop-up the world's currency and being forced to pay taxes too, being worked to death literally and forced to pay taxes in death, Probate Tax!! see, DVLA documents which state 'not proof of ownership -Registered Keeper only!!' as a 'dead debt slaves in law is not allowed to own anything, not their own body, nor any of their properties, homes, children, marriage, automobile, caravan, etc etc!!' because everything 'Registered is unlawfully being owned and stolen by government man/woman' our 'Registered' homes/automobiles/children our properties/our bodies via the Birth Certificates, etc everything is being owned and stolen by government man/woman forcing their 'public man/woman Masters' to Register everything's for them our government man/woman to steal and claim to unlawfully own as theirs!! the 'dead man/woman in law have privileges not rights'!! privileges can be taken away and are, for example Job Centres who 'sanction' the unemployed man/woman and take away their 'privileges' as they have 'no rights', for not being a good slave and working for FREE in all the Council owned bogus Charity Shops making unlawful huge Company/Corporation floated on Stock Exchange profits for all their shareholders/directors, see Companies House Register of Companies, who are stocking ALL their Council bogus Charity Shop with our stolen properties after torturing/robbing/murdering our innocent honourable mother, in our case The London Borough of Barnet Council staff/public servant man/woman are doing these deliberate wrongdoings to us over years and they brazenly and misguidedly believe they can continue to do their evil wrongdoing planned crimes of murder/torture/thefts/harassments/persecutions/unlawfully holding us tortured raped to be murdered isolated victims, etc and get away with it, using the corrupt judiciary magistrates not and never 'judges' (as only trial by jury members are lawful 'judges!'), man/woman, deliberate evil wrongdoer(s) carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten, etc to do these evils to us over years!! with 'citizens arrests and charges' needed on ALL man/woman police who refuse to do their paid/salaried jobs, deliberately too stealing public Masters funds by taking salaries/wages but refusing to arrest and charge criminal wrongdoing judiciary magistrates man/woman, in this case carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten!!

JULY 31 2016 Visiter No.634185 to www.opg.me

JULY 30 2016 Visiter No.634138 to www.opg.me

JULY 30 2016 Visiter No.634135 to www.opg.me
in .pdf here

JULY 29 2016 Visiter No.634092 to www.opg.me

JULY 28 2016 Visiter No.634075 to www.opg.me

AND the breach of OATHS.

JULY 28 2016 Visiter No.634072 to www.opg.me

The carer of 20 years cannot receive care allowance whilst abroad but yet mother can receive her dissability allowance and so the carer is then forced to live from the dissability allowance or the pension so he can eat!
The care allowance was stopped on the 11th April 2016 which to todays date I am owed £1000. So when the only income that the carer has is gone how does the carer pay for his food etc????
There is only one way... and that is to use the disabled persons dissability or their pension!
The caller, HELEN said that when abroad the carer is treated as a sickness benefit when the carer is clearly NOT sick as he is required under their rules to complete 35 hours care per week and in reality I do 85 hours of care so can anyone even begin to understand this???
Again all linked to the same fraud and corruption in my mothers case that the governmental satanic masonic evil conspires across departments to ATTACK.

JULY 28 2016 Visiter No.634056 to www.opg.me

JULY 27 2016 Visiter No.634000 to www.opg.me
Those whom, by deafening silence, in secret, behind closed doors, that run the world, using their own language of ‘legalese’ have over years, very carefully constructed the ‘mother of all frauds’ that has enslaved humanity without your knowledge, consent or full disclosure, by barratry & personage.
THIS smoke and mirrors, of deafening silence & revolving doors, that they swear an oath to protect & its brothers to uphold, conflicts with every other oath they swear in courts &/or public office, demonstrating the satanic evil contained within it.
After 15 years of trying to understand the fraud committed upon my own mother’s live estate and having been recruited myself by the masonic brethren to a level 3rd degree & then resigning I have finally figured out, after waking up, what has & is, going on.
The protection of the brethren is utmost for a mason and just to be certain that they had not overlooked me, I wrote to the masons to underline my masonic distress, that they then could not ignore, but ignore they did, whilst they in disguise, continued to plunder my mother’s live estate treating her, as all others, as DEAD under their legalese language from their fraudulently enforced ‘BAR’/‘LAW’ society.
I then realised it was a case of mason [resigned] against MASONICS.
Uncovering stone after stone along the way the plot of fraud against humanity became more and more sickening as I tread the dark path.
Today, 26.07.2016, I make this statement to reflect what I know to be the truth and how they, the masonic brethren will close their establishment ranks, which are all linked through the judiciary the courts and the government, to set out to destroy you/[me], not caring a jot about who might get in the way, such as ie my disabled mother who has paid into their system of national insurance all her life.
THE FORCE they hold is immense, but it’s all built on FRAUDULENT TREASON, lies and deceit based entirely around money and the love of it, being of course the root of the SATANIC LUCIFERIAN EVIL.
When you finally have all the nuts and bolts it’s easy to put together the fraud and how it is protected by its gate keepers in the black robes, the priests of Baal, just another side order of freemason Jesuit gatekeeping in what are supposedly ‘our courts of law’ that have been usurped by Lucifer’s army of evil.
Common Law/Common sense has been ripped up by these creatures and thrown into the trash can.
THE only law now is their law, being their statute acts and whoe betide those whom object to it.
THE EU that is unelected has thankfully been rejected showing how a democracy does work when given the chance to, especially having waited 44 years to take its course by yet another treasonous devious act by lies and deceit committed with impunity by TED HEATH in 1972.
I do not want to digress to far from the root of our problems and so I will go on….. SOON!

JULY 22 2016 Visiter No.633851 to www.opg.me

JULY 21 2016 Visiter No.633784 to www.opg.me

JULY 19 2016 Visiter No.633706 to www.opg.me

JULY 19 2016 Visiter No.633692 to www.opg.me

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633602 to www.opg.me

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633594 to www.opg.me

We now are drafting a lien to serve upon the wrongdoers including prime minister THERESA MAY.

JULY 16 2016 Visiter No.633590 to www.opg.me

JULY 13 2016 Visiter No.633485 to www.opg.me

notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!

demand/order: service on one is service on all!

Tuesday, 12th July 2016

URGENT - trial by jury to hear our claim(s), etc...

on notice: urgent trial by jury to hear permanent caveat in place to stop fraud upon the court and us!



Warning And Caution : caveat in permanent place until independent sworn-in trial by jury decision on our claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties/permanent caveat in place to stop fraud upon us and our mother's Estate, etc...

for permanently invoked court of [public] records, under permanently invoked common law, law of the land for all alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status...

in i: alive living soul woman court, aggrieved, with full powers of attorney general, executor/executrix for our Estates, we alive living soul claimed bodies, unlimited creditors, with first-hand verified knowledge, prosecutors, prosecuting wrongdoer(s); at queens bench division

on notice: demand/order/wish/affidavit/declaration of will and testament/as-King:

•demand/order: caveat hereby entered, 'let him beware', we are in opposition as fraud upon the court and upon us, we hereby invoke our lawful 'rights' to let an independent sworn-in 'trial by jury' decide upon these claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties/on this caveat, etc, i: alive sovereign free-born woman in law the only executor/executrix/administrator of our dearest mum's entire Estate, which we uphold by our claim of right, us with the only interest in our mum's Estate which i: alive woman, executor/executrix alone have authority for.

•on notice: no action is to take place until this caveat is lawfully heard before trial by jury, due note of our alone interest in our mother's Estate, which i: living soul woman, manage.

•on notice: absolutely no wills to be proved, no grant be sealed in our mother's Estate, no grant letters of administration, not a probate matter, unlawful trespass upon us and our properties, unlawful administration of our properties, demand/order to cease and desist until trial by jury hears this matter and decides upon it...

•sight and proofs of foundation evidence.
•sight of all proofs of claim.

•demand all claim(s) are verified in open trial by jury court, fully open with unrestricted assess to the public and media to witness justice being served and done according to law; common law does not tolerate 'secret courts with secret agendas!'.

•sight of lawful contract.

•sight of full and open honest disclosure of the facts of the contract.

•demand sight of 'Due Process' in law.

•we only operate man/woman to man/woman, alive in law.

•we are the 'alive man/woman in law; we are not the 'dead in law debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations.

•demand proofs we the 'alive man/woman in law' come under statutes/acts for the dead debt slaves in law, companies, corporations, which we are not!

•proofs of jurisdiction to unlawfully administrate our properties, which we put claim)s) upon! *once jurisdiction is called into question it MUST be proved and we demand/order it proved before trial by jury urgent now!

•proofs of authority.

•proofs of lawful consent.

•we do not consent, we do not agree, we refuse all unlawful administration of our properties and demand all our claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc instant now!

•wrongdoer(s) man/woman guilty of failing to lawfully compensate us and to deal with matters lawfully before our demand and order sworn-in trial by jury, wrongdoer(s) unlawful time thefts from us!

•all details for our mother's Estate that i: alive woman in law, alone controls, will be given to the trial by jury to preserve our privacy and confidentiality in law, since wrongdoer(s) are guilty of unlawfully bringing the 'private' into the 'public'.

•on notice: of trespass/copyrights/trademarks, etc breaches/infringements, etc despite Writ(s) being served multiple times to Cease and Desist All Wrongdoing(s), Writ(s) of Dereliction of Duty(ies), etc...

•total abuse of us and power here, with no lawful 'separation of powers', all man/woman breaching their positions, powers and oaths of office to collude and cover-up/destroy evidence/torture and assault witnesses/very serious wrongdoing(s) and frauds for profit planned and instigated to perfection against unsuspecting innocent honourable man/woman alive in law over years causing fatalities by murder, which is why demand/order instant trial by jury sworn-in now posthaste, caveats in permanent place until trial by jury unanimous decisions, etc...

*on notice: treason/misfeasance of treason/malfeasance of treason/barratry by personage/thefts/murders/attempted murders/kidnapping/abduction/torture, etc very serious wrongdoing(s) being deliberately committed by all wrongdoer(s) breaching all laws and in gross dishonour.

**on notice: this matter is urgent, demand/order instant responses to swearing-in trial by jury members to 'judge' our claims/damages/restoration of all our properties/permanent caveat in place until trial by jury to hear our claim(s), etc...

***on notice: demand/order: all our upheld undisputed/no objections/no disputes by any living soul man/woman, our won claim(s)/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc stand in law and MUST be fully paid to us instant, until an independent sworn-in trial by jury members unanimously decide for or against our claim(s), etc in this these claims/damages/restoration of all our properties/hear caveat, etc etc etc...

****reminder: it is free to assess queens bench division, common law, law of the land, the highest law there is, 24/7, justice is free for all alive man/woman in law. and, justice must be seen to be done by the urgent upholding of our lawfully invoked independent sworn-in 'trial by jury!' instant!

all correspondence and attachments applies, maybe cropped, will all be used in evidence...

•without recourse,
•without prejudice,
•all rights reserved,
•errors and omissions excepted,
•Cestui Qui Vie Trust Funds all collapsed/surrendered/yield-up demand our payouts instant now, Form 206 Evidence of Life filled-in ages ago...,
•all inherent unalienable rights intact,
•demand all our claims/damages/restoration of all our properties, etc this instant now!
•UCC 1...,
•UCC 1-308,
•etc etc etc...


JULY 12 2016 Visiter No.633461 to www.opg.me

ALL it needed to expose: Fraud / theft / mal administration / treason / mis prision of treason /mis-conduct in public office / persecution amongst other serious charges is a JURY court of common law as is our rights as man/woman alive flesh born NOT debt slaves etc and the matter can be cleared up. THE MASONICS are at work doing their level best to damage limit the catastrophe that IS the COURT of PROTECTION and its affiliate OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN that are indeed criminally infiltrated organised crime gangs that need eradication NOT just from our life but countless other lives and if you need evidence its all here in this site!

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633415 to www.opg.me

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633414 to www.opg.me

JULY 11 2016 Visiter No.633412 to www.opg.me

JULY 10 2016 Visiter No.633406 to www.opg.me

JULY 9 2016 Visiter No.633361 to www.opg.me

The Birth Certificate SCAM. The BC draws you OUT of the PRIVATE, and into the PUBLIC venue, where you're a SURETY for the PUBLIC (national) DEBT.

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633341 to www.opg.me
Rita Taylor
mike, can you possibly consider putting the below on your website to highlight these crimes wrongdoings against us?
From: rita taylor
Date: 5 July 2016 at 14:18:26 BST
To: Police PC Caroline Robb Colindale
Subject: demand/order instant arrests/charges against all wrongdoer(s) causing us fraud/losses/harm/injuries/fatalities by murder/torture/isolated false imprisonments, etc...
notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!
for permanently invoked court of 'public' records, under permanently invoked common law, the highest law there is, law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status'...
attention man/woman, caroline, woman, in personal/private capacities, bearing full own liabilities in law, under penalties of perjury...
Tuesday, 5 July 2016
writ to cease and desist all wrongdoing(s) against our honourable 'alive man/woman in law' selves instant!
writ of dereliction of duty(ies)
on notice: demand/order by law the following:
1. demand proofs reported crimes have been dealt with.
2. where is our reported stolen properties, as none have been returned?
3. stolen automobile [D751 XNJ; Toyota Space Cruiser, Silver, crime number: 2420891/15] still not returned and no paperwork provided for its theft from our personal/private family driveway, yourselves stating that the LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL staff/personnel man/woman took my property because it had tons of parking tickets on it, this was confirmed by the LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL man/woman as being complete wrong incorrect information given by yourselves, they also stated from their own investigations that these thefts of not only our automobile, but burglaries of our properties were carried out by jon dickinson and his social services departments, who have no authority and no paperworks to do such criminal wrongdoing(s) to us and being supported in serious wrongdoing(s) by all colluding agencies connected, with very serious breaches of 'NO' 'separation of powers'. so, demand automobile back, return of all our burglarised properties, computer, electrical goods, clothing, all our personal and private properties are demanded instantly returned, plus sight of all the relevant paperworks/documents connected to these thefts that are all still outstanding!
evidence concerning the theft of my automobile [D751XNJ] from our private family driveway:
Date: 25 February 2016 at 09:57:11 GMT
To: rita taylor
Subject: Re: Parking Tickets involving D751XNJ
Our Ref: 101000684138
Dear Ms Taylor,
Thank you for your e-mail.
We can confirm that there are no penalty charge notices on vehicle registration D751XNJ.
However if a ticket was issued in the last 24 hours it will not show on our systems yet.
If you need to contact us again regarding your enquiry, please e-mail Parking.Permits@barnet.gov.uk. Alternatively you can call on 0208 359 7446 Monday to Thursday 9am to 5:15pm or Friday 9am to 5pm. Further information about council services can be found by visiting www.barnet.gov.uk.
Kind regards,
Lori-Ann Hooper
Parking br> London Borough of Barnet,
North London Business Park,
Oakleigh Road South,
London, N11 1NP
Tel: 0208 359 7446
Barnet Online: www.barnet.gov.uk
CSG is delivered by Capita plc on behalf of London Borough of Barnet.
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email
How do you rate the service provided in this email?
....End of evidence concerning my stolen automobile [D751XNJ silver Toyota Space Cruiser] stolen by Policeman/woman colluding with Barnet Council staff/personnel man/woman!
4. lawful documents have been served upon yourselves for instant arrests and charges brought against all connected with these criminal wrongdoing(s) and attempting to cover-up these very serious on-going non-stop criminal wrongdoing(s) activities against us, deliberately doing these thieving murderous crimes to us, unlawfully isolating us to carry out these crimes, fabricating evidence, holding us unlawfully isolated England's prisoners robbed of all our properties/family/freedom/liberty/assets/privacy/confidentiality/identity thefts/fraud/losses/harm/injuries/murders/our post stolen from all locations connected to us/torture/harassments/bullying/intimidations/breaches of Data Protection Act/unlawfully administering my properties/slander/defamation of character(s)/libel/no due process of law/deliberate unlawful assets-stripping against us/abusing us made isolated & vulnerable/null and void fraudulent 'orders' being unlawfully with treason, malfeasance of treason, misfeasance of treason/magistrates deliberately and wilfully Administering unlawful Oaths, contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, other offences do apply against [12610636 2.11.2015, 11.6.2015, etc] carolyn/caroline hilder/elizabeth batten/carr, etc [A20100044 Fri 2.7.2010] to asset-strip us, no due process of law, no defendant, no lawful independent sworn-in trial by jury members to hear evidence for the 'alive man/woman in law' us, etc etc...
5. no lawful separation of powers, all colluding man/woman falsifying evidence, committing perjury/lies, destroying evidence, stealing evidence and files from us, unlawfully isolating us to carry out these mafia instigated colluding horrendous torturing thieving murderous crimes over years against us, time thefts from us!
6. we demand arrests/charges brought against all reported to police man/woman, [policeman andy chapman Fraud Operation 'Falcon' committing further wrongdoings against us, Crime Number 2410793/15] [Action Fraud: CHS9597 6.7.2015; NFRC15050103 and NFRC150501035814 8.5.2015; elizabeth batten and carolyn/caroline hilder] Action Fraud by telephone and online, criminal dangerous thieving murderous wrongdoer(s) man/woman involved in this asset-stripping for their profits crimes against us.
7. we have permanently invoked common law, the highest law there is, law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status', yet we are unlawfully being made 'dead debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations in law' in order to asset-strip us further, time thieve from us, isolate and do further wrongdoing(s) to us, continuing to steal all our properties and hold us England's isolated prisoners, etc...
8. there can NEVER be any contracts between the 'alive man/woman in law' and the 'dead in law', but we 'alive man/woman in law' are being unlawfully subjected continually to these wrongdoing(s) by every colluding mafia government agency invoked in these abuses of power and unlawfully no 'separation of powers'.
9. demand arrests made and charges brought against michael culver [police CHS29447 Mon 18.1.2016] [Royal Mail Ref: 858380111 dated 15.2.2016 michael robert culver fraudulent application into Royal Mail to steal my post invading our privacy/confidentiality] for stealing my post, mail, packages/unlawfully administering my properties, accounts/breaches of Data Protection Act/slander/defamation of character/libel/identity thefts/fraud/losses to us/causing us harm and injuries/time thefts/unlawfully acting on null and void fraudulent 'orders' for his own profit from doing deliberate wrongdoing(s) to us and attempting to charge myself for his wrongdoing(s), etc...
10. demand arrests and charges brought against jennifer dias and cameron ryan for colluding fraudulent thieving murderous wrongdoing(s), slander, libel, defamation of character, perjury, lies, unlawfully administering my properties/breaches of Data Protection Act/time thefts from us, etc...
11. demand arrests and charges brought against lloyd wint of SIGN HEALTH and LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET COUNCIL, for unlawfully administering my properties/accounts/thefts/stealing post/abuses of made isolated vulnerable for profits/breaches of Data Protection Act/slander/libel, etc...
12. our copyrights/trademarks all breached/infringements, fee schedules applies.
13. the torture/theft/asset-stripping/murder of our dearest honourable mum, whilst policeman/woman watched the horror and refused to do their paid/salaried jobs, thereby wilfully stealing public funds, etc still doing exactly the same to all our family/properties still!
14. our properties are unlawfully being administered/destroyed/stolen/possessed, etc without our lawful authority/permission/consent/no contracts, etc. we demand/order the instant return of all our properties now!
15. the list of horrendous thieving murderous criminal wrongdoing(s) endless, demanding and ordering instant arrests and charges, remedies according to law to correct, there can by law be no wrongdoing(s) without compensation. demand all our claims/damages, etc are lawfully dealt with instant, no more time thefts from us, we demand all our properties back, we demand our family/freedom/assets, etc etc etc according to law...
Statement of Offence:
Administering an unlawful Oath, contrary to Section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835, possibly other offences do apply here.
Particulars of Offence:
Reference Concerning Case Number 12610636 For Both Magistrates carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten:
carolyn/caroline hilder and elizabeth batten being magistrates for the Court of Protection, LONDON, on 2nd November 2015 and 11th June 2015 respectively, did unlawfully administer an Oath an Order Appointing An Interim Deputy For Property And Affairs on 2nd November 2015 by carolyn/caroline hilder and a Draft Order On Behalf Of The Mayor And Burgesses Of The London Borough Of Barnet on 11th June 2015 by elizabeth batten; in a manner which the said magistrates hilder/batten had no jurisdiction, namely:
The magistrates hilder/batten has sworn an Oath to well and truly serve our sovereign lady queen elizabeth the second in the Office of Magistrates hilder/batten and to do right by all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affectation or ill-will.
The aforesaid Oath under Common Law, Law of the Land, does not authorise any magistrate in the Common Law jurisdiction of England and Wales to adjudicate any Hearing in which the matter is to be decided in any way other than by a Trial by Jury, for the 'alive man/woman in law', who are at position number two below God and Trial by Jury at number one position, the sitting magistrates hilder/batten at position number three below 'alive man/woman in law' at number two position, no one below number two position for 'alive man/woman in law' can possibly sit in judgment when they are below the number two position, God and Trial by Jury is at number one position, therefore it stands to reason that magistrates hilder/batten deliberately acted outside of jurisdiction, deliberately breaking their Oaths of Office to do crimes to innocents for their monetary financial profits, unlawfully raiding the Cestui Que Vie Trust Funds for their victims.
Furthermore, in the Hearing in question there was no Injured Party, no Corpus Delicti, and no Defendant, no one or 'alive man/woman in law' applicable coming under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Therefore, the Common Law Oaths of Office under which the magistrates hilder/batten claimed authority is unlawful and constitutes an offence contrary to section 13 of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.
The fact that the magistrates hilder/batten sat is considered to be prima facie evidence of the offence.
magistrate hilder also knowingly sat on more than one occasion deliberately and knowingly breaking her Oath of Office over a period of time approaching or over a year in time, 2015-2016.
*[magistrate] carr has also breached his 'Oath of Office' and guilt of the offence outlined above in detail, on Friday, 2nd July 2010 [A20100044 Fri 2.7.2010] with policeman/woman, dick brown, alexandra dunmore and alison turner, etc submitting into evidence fraudulent, perjurious, lying evidence, deliberately not having an independent sworn-in trial by jury members present to 'judge' the proceedings! this court 'order' is fraudulent, null and void in law, void ab initio! this was deliberately instigated to asset-strip our mother, abusing all our family members/our properties/us 'alive man/woman in law', etc this is gross abuses of power, abuses of us, no due process of law, no defendant(s), unlawfully no trial by jury members to hear the 'claims' for the 'alive woman in law' myself one of the victim(s) here and our tortured/abused/asset-stripped/robbed/murdered for her assets mum, etc...
on notice: demand/order take permanent note of the following:
•we are not 'titles'.
•no capitalisation is used in our 'appellations' 'names', see Black's Law Dictionary on the 'capitalisation of names'.
•when an 'appellation' is used for a 'name' it can never ever be the 'alive man/woman in law', since 'alive man/woman in law' are unlimited in all things, unique and special, made in the likeness of God, so a 'name' cannot ever be them, or define them, or describe them, a 'name' is simply not the 'alive man/woman in law!
•we are not 'dead in law'!
•we are not 'dead debt slaves/things/creatures/companies/corporations in law'.
•we permanently invoke common law, highest law there is/law of the land for all 'alive man/woman in law with automatic tax exempt status'.
•there can NEVER EVER be any contracts between the 'alive man/woman in law' and the 'dead in law'.
•the 'alive man/woman in law' are at position number two under common law; all magistrates man/woman at position three, so it is impossible for magistrates man/woman to 'sit' in judgment of 'alive man/woman in law', only God/Trial by Jury members are at position number one under common law and capable of 'judging' the 'alive man/woman in law', everything else would be fraudulent and null and void in law, void ab initio.
•any 'siting' magistrate doing a court 'order' for 'alive man/woman in law' would automatically be deliberately fraudulent on the magistrates part, with wilful breaches of their common law 'Oaths of Office', which is an automatic arrestable and chargeable serious offence in law, the subsequent court 'order' would be fraudulent, null and void in law, void ab initio.
•see Halbury's Laws on Administration Courts, that nothing can be done to make them lawful!
•we do not give permission, consent, or authority for our personal/private properties to be administered/destroyed/stolen/possessed by anyone other than us!
•we are not a 'you' or a 'your'!
•demand to know who 'you' and 'your' is?
•send to 'you' or 'your'!
•do not recognise 'you' or 'your'!
•no joinder.
•demand/order no trespass onto our properties.
•all our properties held 'Allodial Title Fee Simple Absolute', which means we hold all of them outright, free of any duties/taxes/levies/fees/costs, etc...
•demand/order instant return and restoration of all our stolen properties belonging to us 'alive man/woman in law', forthwith and on formal official records! demand/order policeman/woman to do their paid/salaried jobs with no time thefts from us, instant!
•our time is not free, that we can never get back, so fee schedules do apply and in operation!
•demand/order all sacked/dismissed man/woman as per written correspondence and attachments is instantly put in prison for life with loss of all their assets, to not only protect us, but the global populous!
•we are not a 'defendant' from your 'dead in law world' EVER, NEVER EVER!!
•all wrongdoer(s) acting on fraudulent fake paperwork(s)/bearing perjurious, lying autographs submitted into evidence, all carry life imprisonments and loss of all wrongdoer(s) assets!
•we assert/demand/order/invoke all our rights according to law, common law.
•demand/order all proofs from all police, man/woman concerned, of lawful dealing(s) with our reported criminal wrongdoing(s) and of dealing with the wrongdoer(s), under penalties of perjury, with full and complete disclosure of all the facts, all evidence needs to be verified in open court before an independent sworn-in trial by jury members to 'judge' all 'claims', and that matters have indeed been dealt with correctly according to law, common law...
•etc etc etc...
on notice: yourselves, all colluding for profits by ill gotten gains, man/woman, wrongdoer(s) guilty of bringing the private into the public which are serious offences in law...
all correspondence and attachments applies maybe cropped, will all be used in evidence...
•without prejudice,
•without recourse,
•all rights reserved,
•all inherent born with unalienable rights intact,
•errors and omissions excepted,
•Cestui Que Vie Trust Funds collapsed demand our instant payouts long overdue, Form 206 Evidence of Life fill-out ages ago,
•UCC 1 copyrights/trademarks notices breaches/infringements with fee schedules in operation,
•UCC 1-308, etc...,
•etc etc etc...

Date: 5 July 2016 at 10:47:58 BST
To: rita taylor
Subject: Call to police
Dear Ms Taylor,
I have been made aware that "you" called police stating that previous reports of crime of theft and murder had not been taken seriously.
I would be grateful if "you" could let me know if anything has happened since we were last in communication several months ago as I know that matters "you" had raised up until then were dealt with???.
Caroline Robb PS 20SX
Total Policing is the Met's commitment to be on the streets and in your communities to catch offenders, prevent crime and support victims. We are here for London, working with you to make our capital safer.
Consider our environment - please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary.
NOTICE - This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).
Find us at:
Facebook: Facebook.com/metpoliceuk
Twitter: @metpoliceuk

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633340 to www.opg.me

JULY 8 2016 Visiter No.633338 to www.opg.me
From:NORMAN SCARTH againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
To: freedomtalkradio2013@gmail.com; lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com; edward.w.ellis@gmail.com; leejaycant@yahoo.co.uk
CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
Subject: PH Solicitor? Wrong, wrong, WRONG!
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:33:09 +0100

This solicitor (I wish you had got his name), is wrong on every count.
He is either completely useless, or, more likely, he is working for the other side.
"courts getting cheesed off with emails"? ​Of course they are! They think they are God Almighty, want The Public to worship them, to keep silent, & to mind their own business. ​
It IS our business!
"solicitor has said peter requests radio silence until the jury has made a final descion"?

I wonder? ​Has Peter really said this, or is it the solicitor speaking? ​ ​
To wait till after the jury's 'final decision? ​
It's too late then! (and the solicitor knows it!)
The solicitor has said "the judge is fair".
He would say that wouldn't he!
Beware the judge who pretends to be on your side! ​ ​
That is just to make it look as though the victim is getting a 'fair trial', & to give him false hope.
"no one can prove peter didn’t put the images on the computer ""
He does not NEED to prove that Peter didn't put the images on the computer.
All he needs to do is cast doubt on the prosecution's motives, & without doubt it is to silence him, & a warning to other whistle-blowers. ​
The decision to charge him as they have done is because they know there only needs to be mention of 'child abuse' to turn the world against the victim of their malice. ​
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ​
Now to the bit where the solicitor says, "Information from various people including Norman scarth isn’t any good at this stage as its only helping as a character witness ​ not as a expert on images ". Who on earth told him that? ​ ​The evidence I would give would NOT be as a 'character witness'. ​And I am certainly not an expert on 'images' (but, as said above, that is completely unnecessary). ​
However, I AM an expert - none greater - ​on skulduggery in the courts, on what constitutes a 'Fair Trial', & on the treatment meted out to whistle-blowers in Britain! ​
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THAT ​is what the jury needs to know about - but, not surprisingly, that is something that the solicitor, ​& barrister, who are SUPPOSED to be defending Peter don't want them to hear!
Norman Scarth
To: butlincat75@googlemail.com; et al
From: freedomtalkradio2013@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 09:06:50 +0100
A Solicitor with a ​Irish accent has just called me advising me the courts ​ are getting cheesed of with many emails from many people.
Peters solicitor has said peter requests radio silence until the jury has made a final descion
He tells me the judge is fair and the trial is going peters way how ever no one can prove peter didn’t put the images on the computer and at this stage we need the judge onside its a 50/50 chance of not guilty.
He told me expert computer people for the defence wasn’t helpful when the pcs hard drives ​was looked at.
He also said Information from various people including Norman scarth isn’t any good at this stage as its only helping as a character witness ​ not as a expert on images.
He told me peters maximum sentence is 4 years so he would be due for release on dec 1 2016 ​ ​ if the prison governor agreed he could be released immediately ​ ​ I have told the solicitor peter can stay with us and there’s housing available.
Thats all I know

JULY 4 2016 Visiter No.633177 to www.opg.me

JULY 3 2016 Visiter No.633165 to www.opg.me
the Universal declaration of rights asserts “that a citizen of a state in which that citizen is present has the liberty to travel, reside in, and/or work in any part of the state where one pleases within the limits of respect for the liberty and rights of others, and that a citizen also has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country at any time”. So with this in mind an act of parliament, must comply with this ruling. i man did not write the law they did and what`s more the Government signed and contracted to both domestically and commercially, it’s a done deal and an inalienable right in law. To add it`s also a fundamental right to which a person is inherently entitled simply because he/she is a human being. And,it is my belief when looking at cf. R v Donavan [1934] 2KB 498 at 507, [1934] AII ER Rep 207 at 210 in delivering that judgment of the court of criminal appeal Swift J states: “If an act is unlawful in the sense of being itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendered lawful because the person to whose detriment it is done consents to it. No person can licence another to commit a crime”.
Justice swift is stating that driving without government documents such as licences, Mot`s etc can be “of itself criminal”, as the government licence these acts and therefore they cannot be criminal. In the opinion of cf. Ex Parte lewis (1888) 21 Q.B.D. 191 Wilis J said in regard to public right of passage the only “dedication” in the legal sense that we are aware of is that as of a public right of passage, as which the legal description is a “right for all Her Majesty’s subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance”.The House of Commons library documents in cf. Roads Unadopted standard Note: SN/BT/402 last updated 18 October 2010 Author; Louise Butcher; Section Business and transport: What is a Highway? “There is no statutory definition of a highway only a common law one. That definition is quite clear; a “Highway is a way over which all members of the public have a right to pass and re-pass. Their use of the way must be as of right, not on sufferance or by licence”. 1 And, In the case of cf. DPP v. jones and another Lord Irvine LC states “The law should not make unlawful what is common place and well accepted there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights”. Sherer v. Cullen, 481 f 946

JUNE 30 2016 Visiter No.633059 to www.opg.me

JUNE 30 2016 Visiter No.633052 to www.opg.me
We will be filing by recorded delivery a formal complaint of masonic conspiracy to deny access to her majesties court of common law in acts of misconduct of public office leading to misprision of treason offences that need police involvement to identify the culprits whom are conducting such frauds upon our courts.
Let's see how far up the ladder that masonic corruption extends by filing such a complaint to see if it gets investigated and of which I seriously doubt!

JUNE 29 2016 Visiter No.633036 to www.opg.me

JUNE 28 2016 Visiter No.632892 to www.opg.me

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632810 to www.opg.me

I asked:
'if the human being'?
they reply
'The person in question'??
The person! being of course the corporation legal fiction strawman but this does not apply to the human being!!!
WHICH was the question!

Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Moving abroad
Dear OPGInformationAssurance,
The original question has been interpreted wrongly.
The PERSON is not what I referred to.
Human being was the question but this I may not have elaborated upon properly, as what I should say is;

•alive man/woman
•alive with souls, claimed bodies, sovereign free-born man/woman

This is the wo/man/alive with soul, claimed bodies that is sovereign free-born and demanded release of funds after emigration with due submitted clinical doctors reports proving capacity to live where and with whom and after such a denial of release of funds suffered losses that until now have been ignored.
Perhaps now might be the time for the ministry of justice to define the difference of: person;
as to, man woman alive with souls claimed bodies free born?
It also needs clarification as whom is responsible after complaints raised were not sufficiently investigated?
AND if they were... were covered over and buried!
The deputy was discharged but due compensation never paid!
YOU as corporation, as dead entities are liable for such losses and also the CEO at the time in his capacity as a man martin [john]
NOW the question is put into the formal format we demand an answer?
Yours sincerely,
mike: clarke
•alive man/woman
•alive with souls, claimed bodies, sovereign free-born man/woman

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632804 to www.opg.me

If you cross reference the dates you can clearly see the frauds going on and that any objections or claims are completely ignored in favour of them placed onto the property long before the objection deadline of the 16th June 2016 where they had already got restriction dated 25th May 2016.

JUNE 26 2016 Visiter No.632798 to www.opg.me

JUNE 25 2016 Visiter No.632786 to www.opg.me

JUNE 19 2016 Visiter No.632575 to www.opg.me

JUNE 18 2016 Visiter No.632540 to www.opg.me
with friend Gordon @ Tommys Cabaret Lounge

JUNE 17 2016 Visiter No.632495 to www.opg.me

JUNE 16 2016 Visiter No.632468 to www.opg.me

Long story short
Last year (2015) there was an 'altercation' in a court in Welshpool. A 'bit of shouting'? (And, no doubt, a few home truths ... from Guy .... to some Solicitor).
Suddenly, months later (January, this year), the police turn up at 8:00pm, at Guy's home, and arrest him.
Guy spends 20 hours in police custody, and is then shipped to Aberystwyth to stand trial for something or other.
It turns out that he's charged with a Section 5 Public Order offence. It is the MINIMUM Public Order offence. If you break wind, in front of a Copper, you can be charged under Section 5. However, it is such a minimal offence that you cannot be imprisoned for a Section 5 offence.
In Aberystwyth, Guy points out that he has no idea why he is there ... that he has never been cautioned or formally charged ... has no paperwork ... has never been bailed ... and doesn't know what is going on. He also claims that there is NO CASE TO ANSWER.
The SICK, PSYCHOPATHIC Clerk of the Court (Michael Cray) spits blood ... and has Guy arrested and imprisoned for 7 days.
Meanwhile this SICKO arranges for the imprisonment to be listed as a "Contempt of Court" ... because imprisonment isn't an option for a Section 5 Public Order offence.
All of this has been Appealed ... including a complaint against the SICKO PSYCHO.
In the video above, Guy gives potted history, and also explains what happened during the final Appeal Hearing last Tuesday 14th June.
The SICKO PSYCHO was placed in the Witness Box and questioned (by Guy) for about 1 1/2 hours.
Apparently (according to this PSYCHO):
1) He considers himself to be a 'Hitman' against Freemen-on-the-Land, and was specially "wheeled into" the Hearing in Aberystwyth.
2) There is a 'Black List' of "Freemen-on-the-Land" ... and any associates ... such that they will get HARSHER treatment ... for daring to raise questions about the ENDEMIC CORRUPTION.
So ... there you go. No surprises there, then ... but good to have confirmation ... so thanks Guy ... and well done!!

JUNE 16 2016 Visiter No.632455 to www.opg.me

JUNE 15 2016 Visiter No.632420 to www.opg.me
in this email

JUNE 14 2016 Visiter No.632417 to www.opg.me
in this email

JUNE 11 2016 Visiter No.632255 to www.opg.me

JUNE 10 2016 Visiter No.632233 to www.opg.me

JUNE 9 2016 Visiter No.632180 to www.opg.me

ALONG with this reply will be a final demand for questions to be answered failing which proof of fraud will become tacit agreement where we can attached the CEO of land graham farrant to our financial damages along with the co conspirators to defraud alastair pitblado & peter aruthur brian jackson as men in their private capacity.

JUNE 9 2016 Visiter No.632177 to www.opg.me
SAME response

here the pdf letter

JUNE 8 2016 Visiter No.632103 to www.opg.me
Yesterdays events are really quite significant on several fronts. All of which relate to the jeopardy that the court of 'protection' have placed my mothers life in whilst breaching several human rights.
The family court is using other members of family's hearsay to justify its actions that can easily in fact, in a lawful common law jury court be proved lies and nor would they be admissible plus the distinct lack credability due to the family's own proved dishonerable actions against their own mother over 20 years, this is on top of not providing one ounce of direct care.
The court care not one jot about this what so ever, as it suits their overall agenda to use, as the romans have done over centuries, rules, 'admiralty' rules ie sTaTuTe, now talmudic, maritime courts to divide and conquer.
The relatives lack of educated intelligence cannot see the frauds and so continue blinded mainly because of their blinkered vision see's only, their own goal which is to pigeon hole their own mother into what they see as the best for her, without listening to one word uttered of mum's own 'words of' capacity in which even if she did not have capacity, under mental health sTaTuTe rules would still be entitled to her wishes met 'right or wrong'.
So the courts using their fraudulent bent system can manipulate the so called 'patient' into their own corrupt masonic environment.
The problem that they have created is exposure to serious health problems for mum, by denying her the rights to have dignity, in providing for her own care expenses whilst being forced abroad into exile from such utter, vile, satanic masonic corruption, being pushed upon her. The denial of her own property that is under the control of her living will executor as per such living will, but unlawfully court blocked, leaves her without immediate health care should the UK vote out of EU on the 23rd June 2016 again placing her in a periless position.
My partner and I have now acquired 2 jobs each within the entertainment area and are working sometimes double shifts as was the case yesterday a total of 10 hours ie from 5pm until 9pm in one venue then 9pm till 2pm in another leaving mum for an inordinate amount of time that I would rather not do! When this doubles into me and my partner doing the same as was the case yesterday it forces mum into one position for that duration of time ie on a chair or in her bed because she cannot walk. Mum has not fully recovered from her bed sores acquired in Thailand from her bout of dehydration and that I am trying to keep on top of that recovery by ie turning her in her bed every couple of hours that I cannot do when working and therefore because she cannot do it herself her condition is at risk by being denied her 'carer' from
a] the withdrawal of UK benefits for dissability care and mobility that she is entitled as she paid into the system all her life for such insurance and her exile has been forced by breach of human rights where she is entitled to investigations by law into the allegations of fraud and theft upon her estate that have not been conducted.
b] she has capacity and has had capacity from day one that is yet to be exposed just another fraud and that even without it she has a living will executor trying to protect her health by the sale of her property prevented and denied by the court.
In effect the UK family court system is killing her indirectly, one way or another.
It is for the above reason we make the statement here and now, for a future common law jury court to assess proper damages and in the hope mum does not deteriorte any further. I do believe that the spanish hospital had given up on her prognosis but from my documented video care had made inroads to better health for mum but this now is being made impossible by having to take 2 jobs and the removal of mums dissability allowance and my care allowance plus the prevention of the sale of her property to provide care funds for needed medical requirements of now and the future. These allegations I lay directly at the court of neglection which is indeed a masonic based satanic CoN of fraudulent business, causing untold hardship for mum in her unhealthy late years that the court are to blame for.
Today we take on board SPANISH RESIDENCIA!
here a book called AGAINST HER WILL!

Mum at 8pm today

JUNE 7@1430hrs 2016 Visiter No.632068 to www.opg.me
House buyers pulls out because the matter is taking too long!!
Recorded telephone conversation to follow, to be used in evidence against the criminal court of 'protection', who are only using hearsay to do what they do, protecting themselves against the allegations that are now mounting to substantial figures.
here in this call

JUNE 7@1300hrs 2016 Visiter No.632055 to www.opg.me

JUNE 7@11am 2016 Visiter No.632050 to www.opg.me

JUNE 7@10am 2016 Visiter No.632045 to www.opg.me

JUNE 6 2016 Visiter No.631977 to www.opg.me

JUNE 4 2016 Visiter No.631971 to www.opg.me
in a 3.5 hours youtube video here

JUNE 4 2016 Visiter No.631955 to www.opg.me

i man reply here below \/\/\/\/----

returned today no contract no consent

JUNE 3 2016 Visiter No.631884 to www.opg.me

JUNE 2 2016 Visiter No.631835 to www.opg.me
GRAHAM FARRANT recorded letter dispatched

MAY 31 2016 Visiter No.631790 to www.opg.me

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631717 to www.opg.me

full 5 pages here http://opg.me/landregisterrestriction.pdf
RESPONSE to TITLE No LA826609 [re Jo Savage letter/notice B136]
URGENT sending by email, fax and recorded delivery post to the
alastair [pitblado] & graham [farrant]
notice to agent is notice to principle
notice to principle is notice to agent

The order of the 9th MAY 2016 was VOID by TREASON
Your offer by notice B136 is defaced and attached as refused not contracting services not required
Quote; my property/mum, ann [CLARKE], is being deprived of her human being rights [evidence & proof of life form 206 http://opg.me/206-signedann.pdf] here
& that
The Land Registry ( Rules ) Committee stated on record in 2008, they "were satisfied the LRA2002 [LAND REGISTRY ACT] complied with the HRA [HUMAN RIGHTS ACT] and thus, section six of that Act".
It must then follow there has been a breach of the HRA, as there has been no regard for mum's wishes in seeking dignity, to provide her own medical care/costs by the sale of her home, a course of action she has been forced to take as her dissability and care funding has been withdrawn by her residing abroad, a situation again forced upon her, as me her only carer and also with all the executor rights to attend to her legal affairs through a legally drawn up living will that this judge confirms has legal force [http://opg.me/will20082012.pdf] here, would face incarceration if we both return to the UK.
We therefore strenuously point out that Land Registry's role is one to register property/land, and to make record of the details involved in such transactions as transfers of ownership, run smoothly.
It is not the role of Land Registry to involve itself in extra curricular activities to do the bidding of courts acting outside of Acts of Parliament such as their refusing to comply with a validly made subject access request made under the Data Protection Act which clearly is defined in the Human Rights Act as, the right to a fair trial (section 6.1), being the means to seek information to use to put your case and your defence at court [currently ongoing within QUEENS BENCH RCJ claim here linked
We seek to assert and demand, Land Registry CEO provide their 'defence' for acting outside of their practises / procedures / protocols, in seeking to do the bidding of unlawful actions that can only achieve further hardship on my elderly sick mother whose entitlement to her rights supersede any unlawful and unjust meanderings of Land Registry being couched to foster.
YOU as CEO but man, graham [FARRANT] and your organisation have five working days to reply .
We reserve all our rights if you fail to provide a full and lawfully proper defence for your actions, to seek any actions available to us, including involving our MP and legal/lawful advisors into these communications and any reply that results from it, not excluding a commercial lien that we may seek to issue upon you in your private capacity as a man, for £10,000,000 [ten million pounds] in your failure to comply with our demand for a lawful response immediately to imanmike@rake.net
This correspondence will be duplicated, served & enacted upon the Official Solicitor himself personally in his private capacity as a man alastair [PITBLADO].
[If I were either of YOU, I would tread with extreme caution!]

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631688 to www.opg.me

MAY 30 2016 Visiter No.631686 to www.opg.me

MAY 29 2016 Visiter No.631666 to www.opg.me


Where swearing an oath to protect the brethren above all other is completely incompatible with the public oath of office taken. The contradiction is blatant, the fraud is just another fraud built upon other frauds of identity theft of the corporate person name/strawman used to gain sTaTuTe joinder to incarcerate you whether that be by prison OR under their Mental Capacity ACT 2005 rules that are completely unfit for purpose unless the purpose is to protect satanic priests of baal worshippers that are indeed committing heinous crimes against babies, infants, and those whom stand against such barbarity as I and others being kidnapped, forced into exile and or denied rights and justice under jewish zionist talmudic rule from the B>A>R> British Admiralty Rule.
READ about the reality of false prophets here

MAY 28 2016 Visiter No.631651 to www.opg.me
last date of contact 16/5/2016 after the release of this VIDEO

Rita is the person speaking on this video of making a jury court common lore claim that was made public recently she is now missing believed kidnapped by the satanic ruling elite until proved otherwise... her facebook profile is..
The police have been informed but terminated the call today @4pm 28/5/2016 in a video to be released shortly.
This is the pioneering work that Rita has been persuing..
by rita taylor Reclaim Divinity as Prosecutor over Satanic wrongdoers under common law and UCC - in which you are the Prosecutor of an unlimited number of wrongdoers and demand nullification of fraud actions, claim damages and compensation as remedy, cure, maintenance as a freewill man woman, principle, deity from a magistrate of a lower fiction corporate system..
TEMPLATE 01 by rita taylor in "susan's court", Introduction
at queens bench division', etc everyone's own personal 'court' completely under your rules, your terms, with your orders demanded to be carried out by your public servants, if they do not like it, then let them urgently convene a 'trial by jury', but your input of documents must be complied with. maxims of law:~ 'as no man can dismiss another man's claims' 'any man who wants to wrongfully steal another man's world, can have his entire world and more lawfully taken from him':~
queen's bench division magistrates can then either:~
1. pay up;
2. negotiate;
3. invoke a 'trial by jury';
4. the worse possible option would be for them to do further crimes!
template for a claim into queens bench division:~
important: everything must be in lower case letters, avoid all capital letters, unless a Company/Corporation or names of towns/cities, etc...
do not go to the court, or court 37, deal with everything on paper, preferably by email to keep down costs, keep things simple. best avoid all telephone calls with all government staff men/women as they will try devious unlawful tricks and lies to push through their crimes.
do not fill-out their forms or pay any fees, this is not an application, but a common lore/law 'claim, order, award', to award your own damages and settlements and gets things quickly sorted; this 'claim, order, award' is above any magistrate order.
example: ~ the claimant/the victim here is john paul joseph [smith]; under common lore/law a man can only have two names, and none of those two names can be a surname! in fact, no adult man/woman can have an identifying name under common lore/law. an adult man/woman can use an 'appellation' in order to deal with commerce.
thou = singular
you = plural
everything in lower case letters, the layout and style must be kept to, without changes. omit, add or include to own personal circumstances.
when completed send via paper or email to queens bench division, copy in whoever appropriate. ...........
Subject: [case numbers, in these squared brackets] common lore, queens bench division invoked, demand order damages instantly!
notice to agent is notice to principal,
notice to principal is notice to agent!
x3 once, twice, thrice...
reference: [case numbers] common lore, queens bench division invoked, demand order damages instantly!
demand and order: court of records [public], common lore [law = is legalese word] permanently invoked...
demand and order: service on one is service on all; all duly filed and served....
in john paul-joseph court at queens bench division
date here
i: man, prosecutor
UK PLC UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION LIMITED all derivatives thereof... all government staff men/women in their person/private capacities... (numbered list of wrongdoers men/women, put outside of these brackets) 1. put name of wrongdoer here in lower case letters. 2. as number one above... 3. as number one above... 4. as number one above... etc etc etc...
all as above wrongdoer(s) all as above email addresses, liens, estoppels, bills, etc etc...
nature of case: claim, order, award...
claim: trespass [list the crimes in these squared brackets, example - theft]
i: man demand, require 'court of record', common lore ; 'trial by jury';
i: man, claim, order, award:
• the said wrongdoer(s) trespass upon i: man property(ies);
• the causal agent of the trespass, comes by way of its use of forged instruments, (list the crimes outside of these brackets, example theft)...;
• the trespass did and does harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc to i: man property(ies);
• the commencement of the wrong, harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc etc began on and around (put date crimes started, outside of these brackets);
• the wrong, harm, injuries, losses, fraud, etc etc continues to this day, (put the date you are doing this claim, outside of these brackets);
• i: man, demand, order: the immediate nullification/discharge with prejudice of [put case numbers in these squared brackets you want nullified]; all such written nullity documents must be produced and sent to i: man, instantly;
• i: man, demand, order and award: compensation and damages for the initial and continual trespass upon my property(ies) and the immediate return of all stolen property(ies), instantly or the clock continues to tick by the second [viz.., moment in time] for (put amount in words, pounds sterling, and in numbers, for any per second of time thefts delays in paying out damages, put figures outside of these brackets) per second for every second unlawfully deprived of property(ies);
• i: man, demand, order and award: compensation and damages due instantly: (put amount in words, pounds sterling, and in numbers, outside of these brackets) is overdue payment, demand this amount is forwarded instantly to i: an alive/breathing/with soul/sovereign/flesh and blood/free born man immediately posthaste or further damages/costs/charges/interest/time thefts, etc will become due...;
i: man, say here, and will verify in open court, common lore, trial by jury, that all herein be true...
so, say, demand, order and award, i: man, all said payments and documents must instantly be produced and given posthaste no delay to i: man, now...urgent action needed, demanded and ordered: life endangerments, necessary and proper, needs; i: man/woman/our family are not part of your society...
notice: demand, order: i: man does not take surety for the legal person, a fiction, a piece of paper, strawman...
[case president at Warwick Crown Court, queens bench invoked, on 13.12.2013 Rugby Borough Council vs resham maan]
all correspondence and attachments applies, maybe cropped...
without recourse, without prejudice, non-assumpsit, all rights reserved, all inherent unalienable rights intact, errors and omissions excepted, maybe copied, recorded, circulated, without further notice..., all evidence can and will be used in evidence...,
debts: cestui que vie trust funds collapsed still awaiting lore-full/lawful payouts to ourselves, i: man, demand, order and award this is instantly remedied forthwith...,
debts: unlawfully using i: man/woman/our family, who are alive/breathing/with souls/sovereign/fleshand blood/free born men/women, as dead debt slaves/companies/corporations, etc without fuldisclosure/without our express permission/without our consent/without valid contracts, etc etc demand damages/remedies/settlements/resolutions according to lore/law now long overdue payments to ourselves
- i: man, demand, order and award instant payments to remedy now forthwith...; UCC 1-308, etc...;
etc etc etc...
SUPREME COURT VIDEO CALL 27th MAY 2016 regarding conflicts of oaths in a satanist denial of justice by conflict of oaths.
SUPREME COURT biographies here

MAY 28 2016 Visiter No.631645 to www.opg.me

MAY 27 2016 Visiter No.631592 to www.opg.me
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 20:09:34 +0100
Subject: Corruption in Court of protection
From: md93752@gmail.com
To: info@factuk.org.uk
CC: md93752@gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
last month my family lost a battle with Essex County Council, resulting in the CoP appointing a Deputy of its choice to manage/liquidate my mom in law's ​ two and a half million pounds estate.
A very complexes machinery involving the memory assessment team, adult social services, the office of public guardian, and finally the official solicitor and the CoP were used with devastating consequences to us as a family.
My mom in law who is 86 and a retired head teacher started developing short term memory loss that became noticeable back in 2012.
After a short hospital stay, she was referred to the memory assessment team who quickly developed a strong interest in her estate.
When I objected to the intense scrutiny into her estate, a vicious campaign of demonization, slander and harassment started against me by adults social services aided by the local council.
I was accused of physical, financial, emotional abuse, and harassment of my mom in law. Every aspect of my private life was scrutinized by Social services in a quest to humiliate and discredit me. I plunged into depression when one day out with my mom in law, the social workers told the police that I have kidnapped her, the police removed her and turned her to the social workers who placed her in a nursing home for two months while refusing to let us see or talk to get.
My mom in law had in place a Power of Attorney in favour of her son and an acquaintance, back in 2007 when she stated to put her affairs in order.
In the end they revoked ​ two powers of Attorney, got a special order to sack her account of over £ 15.000 ​ that they never accounted for.
The CoP ignored the fact that the local authorities did not provide any evidence to support their allegations.
Instead the court named a Deputy, gave him power to liquidate the estate and barred me from ever seeing my mom in law.
Against my husband who is my mom in law's only child, they used his OCD condition to strip him of the PoA his mom gave him claiming he is not fit to run her affairs.
I am desperate to tell my story to anyone who will listen if only to inform the public and alleviate the pain I experience every waking moment knowing such corruption can be taking place away from public scrutiny in today's Britain
Hoping you might be able to guide and advise me, I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind Regard Marie Davis

MAY 26 2016 Visiter No.631561 to www.opg.me
as master and king, from servants

MAY 25 2016 Visiter No.631486 to www.opg.me

MAY 24 2016 Visiter No.631482 to www.opg.me
WANDA MADDOCKS makes a comment on FACEBOOK
from experience of course CLICK to enlarge

Wanda Maddocks if you look into her further down this website SHE. was the first person to be jailed by the court of protection and offers her advice. Wanda Maddocks Yes, i know exactly what you are going through, dont ever bring her back to England what ever you do, you are allowing her to live a lot longer by been professionaly cared for by your self, and loved, with a lovely healthy climate, --- keep up the good work, see if you are entitled to NHS continue funding for your mum over there, ---- extra money.

MAY 23 2016@9pm Visiter No.631436 to www.opg.me

MAY 23 2016 Visiter No.631393 to www.opg.me
You would think under normal circumstances that the effect this is having upon my 75 yr old disabled mothers life would be sufficient to do the right thing, but no, the forces of evil just carry on, in a sea of silence.
i: man, submitted a claim for demanded damages to be actioned immediately due to life endangerment, to the invoked jury court of QUEENS BENCH DIVISION 'action department', by recorded delivery one week ago and apart from the emailed version receiving an automated response confirming its delivery and of course the signed for receipt from the royal mail recorded delivery we have received nothing else what so ever!
This confirms the level of corrupt collusion and conspiracy to deny all rights to justice in a TALMUDIC operation conducted within her majesties courts that are indeed, in fact, registered corporations, believe it or not, where the oaths that these magistrates claim to uphold can be smokescreened, without asking the pertinent question of, which OATH are you upholding? the oath of court, the oath of office or the masonic oath??
THE deception and illusion of trickery/fraud being used upon an unsuspecting public that is thankfully getting very wise is beyond belief.
Crime by court officials of any level is all just part of their normal daily routine, in games they surely enjoy inflicting upon the affected.
The courts are actually doing exactly what was expected so its no surprise to me and therefore has little to no effect upon our fight apart from exposing their criminal collusion conspiracy of intent further, which is a bonus in our camp.
The tragedy to it along side the other injustices being suffered means that we have had to alter what we do to accomodate more income, that has been removed from my mother, meaning we can spend LESS time with her than before.
Its as though the court and siblings see my mother as a 'parcel' that can be passed from one to another at their convenience without a thought for her choices. WELL, its not 'pass the parcel' she is perfectly functional in the brain with who and where she wants to be and so to attempt to remove that by force seems inhumane, which is another word for breaching her human rights. The court have made mention very recently about her recent capacity which highlights how this corrupt courts expands as it goes, it's own goal posts, to meet its own demand for huge legal fees.
If you read all of this site you will see over the years how the criminal probate racketeering fraudsters have constantly made up new rules [expanding goalposts] to cover any and all eventuality cropping up. More recently I focus on a comment made by 'Judge Jackson' about if it was in my mothers best interests to live abroad? THIS is exactly by example how they function... forgetting that she has lived abroad for 8 years since 2008 when she 'emigrated' taking her out of their ENGLAND & WALES jurisdiction and that the court still fails to address the losses that they inflicted upon her by a forced living from £ sterling, in a devalueing pound that forced annual payments up to accomodate the deputies failings of EXCHANGE RATE losses that the court then have used with the newspapers to lay blame upon the carer!
The carer aint taking any what so ever blame and infact demands a common law trial by juror of those people named in the claim to shed light on the injustice suffered of substantial proportions and also where people are unaware that if laws are unjust as is the case here and its criminal backers being the poloticians whom refuse to act upon to change the laws, do not realise that a JURY can change LAWS. THIS is why they fear a jury?
THE truth is not something the governemnt want to deal with. THIS is another HILLSBOROUGH in the waiting but put a multiplier of 100 on it and that might show how explosive it will be.
In 2013 the mental capacity act select committee investigating all this LORD HARDIE stated, quote; " The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. The Government needs to go back to the drawing board to draft replacement provisions that are easy to understand and implement, and in keeping with the style and ethos of the Mental Capacity Act." but WHAT has changed?
Even such corrupt judges have weighed in, with ie Jacksons quote; " The law is completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised" but yet in contradiction his wikipiedia profile describes him as a master tactician who stalks his prey! [PREDATORY GUARDIAN] Its this kind of hypocrissy which is forcing LiPs litigants in person to fight their own cases but being met unlawfully by case dismissal with an endorsement accross it of 'without merit' and this should be followed by full reasoning by law, but usually is'nt, as in my case NO REASONS were given and to add insult to injury mine was followed with the further injustice of 'a 2 year civil restraint order' from making any further applications!
Recently I saw one guy comment on facebook about this which is listed as a picture here lower down, that his version of 'without merit' means , 'fuck off I am the judge and it is my duty to cover up the fuck ups of government', which in my opinion make the utmost sense!
In comments to one onlooker researching the court of protection who was asked about had there been any people released from it?? He responded by saying 'YES' all those who were in a box!!
NOW just look at it from afar and work it out for yourself.
WHO is protecting 'WHO'??
The criminals ie: the BAR [BRITISH ADMIRALTY RULE] are protecting the criminals ie: the BAR, backed by a 'corporate' Talmudic [zionist] court service that IS NOT repeat not related to her majesty, what so ever with smoke screen oaths in the main, MASONIC, demonstrating that the masonic linked HILLSBOROUGH tragedy is in comparison to this, SMALL!
I do hope people are getting the picture.
NOW the talmud court want to appoint the talmud official solicitor where his reputation goes before him in other cases whom have been defrauded by him the official solicitor.
ITS not an appointment of the official solicitor that's needed as THIS is just another arm, another branch of the same BAR fraud... IT's a JURY court that's needed... that's unbiased .. that can take lawful action in correcting the injustices.. where we do not subscribe to further injustices at my mothers expense.
What the BAR have done along with GOV.UK departments is a very very lucrative REVOLVING DOORS routine where you the innocent think you are going to get justice... and years pass by for example as in the HILLSBOROUGH case 27 years have passed by before a JURY was brought in to convict but yet their revolving doors still exist on other injustices like ours.. the same with complaints like the PHSO parliamentary health and service ombudsman they just go around and around reaching no particular goal.

MAY 20 2016 Visiter No.631292 to www.opg.me
in HIDING [click to enlarge]

MAY 18 2016 Visiter No.631200 to www.opg.me

confirmation email received 10.49am

MAY 18 2016 Visiter No.631197 to www.opg.me

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631157 to www.opg.me
Many Thanks for returning this to me.
I confirm contracts have been issued today.
I have made contact with Linder Myers and Pannone LLP in relation to the notices that appear on the title that will need to be removed.
I will contact you again once I receive any enquiries from the buyer’s solicitor.
Solicitor and Director
Conveyancing Department
Direct Dial 01253 629282
Whilst mums needs are now substantial especially where a permanent roof over head is concerned and now FOOD and medical needs that cannot be met due to the UK.government STOPPING her dissability payment and my care allowance totalling £600 per month THEY ALSO have a hold on her property which inturn may end up causing her death! PLEASE SOMEONE HELP!
The corrupt judge in this is 'jackson' his email address is his clerk - alexandra.morton@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631144 to www.opg.me

So you don't believe me?...Sure okay, I can respect that, you SHOULD question EVERYTHING. How about the U.S SUPREME COURT?...would you believe them for saying the same thing?
The Supreme Court Confirms, only the dead can appear in their "probate" courts. ALL CASES are just probate…so master that!
Maxim of Law: "Disparata Non Debent Jungi"; Latin: Dissimilar things ought not to be joined. PAPER to PAPER and flesh to flesh…. BUT NOT, PAPER to flesh or flesh to PAPER. The Maxim of Law of "like kind". This is why the "private" living being cannot appear in their courts or they are doomed to be turned into a coporation (trustee), and pay the price, literally.
flesh = a living private woman, a living private man jane doe, John Doe
PAPER = a fictitious contract entity, an artificial person, corporation – usually identied in all capital letters as an entity/ person such as: JANE DOE, JOHN DOE
Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54), SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL WO/MAN (not allowing yourself to be identified as a mere fiction; "person"s the key).
Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” Supreme Court Reporter S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54)

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631143 to www.opg.me

i: man: master and king attach demand instant damages ordered within such demand are per second charges of £1000 per second of delay i: man provide 48 hours to action demand based on delivery signed for this morning contained within is mention of life endangerment thus matter urgent
auto reply received at 13:05

MAY 17 2016 Visiter No.631141 to www.opg.me
There were queues of litigants in person at the courts, it appears after a recent article that the fat cat lawyers whom were taking all the money had pissed a lot of people off.
Anyway lots of squabbling to the point of security guards being called, of course this got through to the office staff.
The head of the courts got into an argument with Chancery and resigned his post grin emoticon... 50 people this week, 100 next week then 500 then 1000 screaming for justice no doubt.
So it appears they’re rejecting any LIP’s claims as with no merit in order to force them back to take solicitors.
They’re losing so much money due to Lip’s cases increasing by 40%.
So for a rejection, the answer is “ I conditionally accept what you say subject to proof of claim that your authority goes beyond the european Human rights judges” (rofl).

MAY 16 2016 Visiter No.631138 to www.opg.me

MAY 15 2016 Visiter No.631048 to www.opg.me

example 2 click to enlarge

eg 3

4 click to enlarge

MAY 14 2016 Visiter No.631019 to www.opg.me

receipt received
Thank you for your email.
Please note that messages received after 4:30pm may not be read until after 9.00am the following day.
If your email is regarding an active case in the Queen's Bench Action Department and does not comply with CPR Practice Direction 5B - Electronic communication and filing, contains multiple attachments, or a single attachment consisting of more than 10 pages your message will not be dealt with.

MAY 14 2016 Visiter No.630980 to www.opg.me
York, May 2nd 2016. Our intrepid reporter was present at today's hearing. Grandma B was also there. The court referred to her as "BH", as there are restrictions on reporting her name. Her loyal son Peter Hofschroer, whose name we can mention, was present via a video link.
As with last month's hearing, the video link was not set up so that Peter could see the court. He could only see the judge. Then the audio link was so bad that Peter could not hear what was going on. When Peter pointed out to the judge - Clive Heaton QC - that it was a basic premise of English law that justice has to be seen to be done and that there could only be a fair hearing if Peter could hear what was being said, the judge showed his characteristic contempt for the law and carried on regardless.
Grandma B was distraught that she was unable to converse with her loyal son, which was most likely the court's intention.
This is, of course, emotional abuse of Grandma B by which is perversely called the Court of "Protection".
The next hearing is due on May 16th 2016 at York Crown Court.
All Grandma B ever wanted was to be able to spend her last years living in her own home in peace and safety. Thanks to what Lord Maginnis has described in Parliament as "persecution" by North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services, this was not to be.
For more about this story please go to:

MAY 13 2016 Visiter No.630951 to www.opg.me

MAY 12 2016 Visiter No.630881 to www.opg.me
Dear who it may concern
re attached pdf or linked here http:​//opg.​me/peterdefaced.​pdf​ listed below
as a result me and my mum have moved address once more because of current actions by the corrupt court.
only this time we are effectively in hiding,,, no one will be receiving our current location along with only limited posts now on facebook
this court is indeed an organised criminal mafia gang of fraudsters and we stand on everything published on our website www.opg.me
mum is not owned by the court, she is, as i sovereign, god made and therefore answerable to god and a jury, as has been demanded time and time again
we attach our response to the corrupt court today with the order issued but now defaced with a refusal to contract so therefore void
we will shortly be filing our claim into Queens Bench addressing all relevant parties concerned with our claim to go before a jury
a truly shocking turn of events this all is and even more for mum in her late years to be robbed of her freedom by passport removal and also threat of a care home and internship within the United Kingdom.
I also cannot speak as I find on matters of crime which I believe is my duty to, but by doing so to be statute robbed of my rights to be thrown into prison as a whistle-blower of crime
my mothers losses have been claimed but not dealt with by bent judges, in fact ignored without mention of, during all proceedings
human rights breaches in abundance the UK cares not a dot with the CONSULATE, FOREIGN OFFICE and worst our MP Gordon Marsden sit idly by watching it happen and unfold without lifting a finger.
THE CRIME MINSTER too with cohort taking the MICHAEL GOVE has done nothing... it seems the UK s criminal actions are being extended worldwide upon pensioners who are at risk from them of being asset stripped or better termed financially raped with impunity, who also cannot emigrate or leave the UK in digust without first obtaining the permission of the criminal fraudsters whom are doing it, the court of protection proved and here linked in the what do they know question submitted to the OPG last week.. https:​//www.​whatdotheyknow.​com/request/moving_abroad#inco​ming-806771
Thank you for your email of 22 April 2016. In regards to a client moving abroad and taking their estate overseas with them, although this is in principle permitted, you are advised to contact the Court of Protection.
An additional Order may be required authorising the purchase of property, and a decision will be needed on whether the move abroad is in that client's best interests.
It is not something that the Office of the Public Guardian can authorise without prior approval from the Court.
It will also be necessary to contact the relevant authority in the foreign country to ensure that the equivalent of a deputyship or attorneyship can be set up to manage the client's needs.
As was documented on our website when we tried to do this 6 years ago the cost was €3000 and was to be born by the carer then IF SUCCESFUL can be claimed back from mothers estate clearly showing the court have made such a move impossible to make and therefore forced to live from £ sterling and the UK internship as a prisoner, breaching human rights.
On Monday next I have a meeting face to face with a journalist whom is flying out here to take our story in person.
Things can only get better as sadly they cannot get much worse as it would appear there is common purpose at work with the removal of mums disability allowance payment.
Our resolve grows stronger though by the day as does mums health and so our fight as long free will continue to what ever bitter end we must endure.
mike & ann

MAY 11 2016 Visiter No.630865 to www.opg.me

MAY 9 2016 Visiter No.630824 to www.opg.me

NOT acting in the best interests of my mother by again generating more fraudulent costs to her remaining depleted estate by court of protection corruption. AGAIN completely ignoring CLAIMED LOSSES that the court conveniently skips over to suit their own racketeering and looking to have respresentation by official solicitor when she clearly has an EXECUTOR under the terms of the living will to do just that!
Making further delays upon mums life and her human rights being trashed by a vicious inhumane gang of fraudsters that trade under the guise of protection clearly protecting only themselves and ALL outside their jurisdiction, noting down their complete disregard for my mother immediate care needs.

MAY 8 2016 Visiter No.630700 to www.opg.me

MAY 7 2016 Visiter No.630672 to www.opg.me
ADMIRALTY[their courts] v COMMON[our courts]
Anna von Reitz
I have written several articles that explain the simple FACT that we are supposed to have TWO functioning court systems operating in the behalf of the people --- one an admiralty court operating on the jurisdiction of the sea, one a common law court operating on the jurisdiction of the land. Duh, folks, how hard is this to grasp?
It's very plainly stated in the Constitution. Amendment VII. Read it.
So where are your Common Law Courts, given the further fact that all you ever see in the courthouses scattered across America are admiralty or administrative courts?
They've vanished, even though they are absolutely mandated.
So where are they? Answer: you haven't provided them for yourselves.
You have to provide your own government. You are supposed to be self-governing,. Remember? That means you have to elect and staff and support your Common Law Courts, because there is NO mandate in the Constitution for the "federal government" to provide these courts for you.
The Constitutoin is only concerned with setting up and running the federal government. And the federal government is only concerned with international and interstate affairs.
So, you won't find a lot of reference to the Common Law Court System in The Constitution, because it was taken for granted and was not the subject of The Constitution as a whole. Nonetheless, our American Common Law Court System was and deserves to be the dominant court system in America.
It's what you are owed and what you owe yourselves, along with your birthright standing as American State Nationals.
There are misguided and also self-interested souls wandering around saying that I am a "fake" judge. All those individuals are either (1) ignorant or (2) self-interested because they make money off the admiralty court system and are afraid of losing their gravy train, or (3) both.
As with everything else, you have to learn. You have to read. I can point things out to you, but it is up to you to think and to look around the corners.
Who has a vested interest in trying to keep Americans from exercising their right of self-governance? Who profits from suppressing or attempting to discredit the lawful work and standing of the American Common Law Courts and judges?
I think it is apparent that a whole roster of people have grown rich off the admiralty and administrative court system. I think that those same people have enjoyed the power of control and oppression of others that "owning the court system" has given them.
If you want justice, you must give it to yourselves. You must demand it and you must begin by building your own local jural societies, electing your court officers, your sheriffs on the land, and all the other vacated offices must be filled. Otherwise, the "money mill" that the courts have become will only grow more corrupt.
It is an ugly but common fault of human nature to want to control others and to profit from them. This despotism and oppression is something you can prevent if you act now and act decisively and intelligently in support of your own Common Law Courts.
See my earlier post at www.annavonreitz.com comparing and contrasting Common Law v. Admiralty in Our Courts v. THEIR Courts.

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630647 to www.opg.me
When Grandma B was abducted from her refuge in Germany in May 2014, eye-witnesses mention the presence of people from Britain with the German police, one of whom has been identified as her main abuser. North Yorkshire Police (NYP) and York Council have persistently denied that any of their officers were present.
However, we have now had sight of documents from an anonymous source inside NYP indicating that at least one of their officers was there.
One may ask what officers of NYP were doing in Germany. Apparently, this officer's role was to provide an English-speaker to converse with Grandma B.
Excuse me, but does the German police not have interpreters available, making it unnecessary to send over a group of officers from Britain, none of whom were likely to be able to speak German? Grandma B's refuge was just down the road from the RAF base at Guetersloh. If the German authorities had nobody suitable, would it not have been easier to find a suitable person there?
Then this part of Germany has been host to British armed forces since 1945.
Many local officials speak fluent English.
Why couldn't one of them have acted as interpreter? When the German police kidnapped Grandma B's carer Peter Hofschroer, the German police violently assaulted him then held him for four hours before releasing him without charge.
In that time, Grandma B's flat had been carefully searched and showed no signs of disturbance. However, both her passport and medical insurance card were missing, as well as a large sum of cash.
It would have taken a matter of minutes to search this small flat, but NYP officers were in it for four hours. They had access to Peter's laptop, which contained the evidence he has of NYP's criminal activities. It is likely his laptop was accessed and his data downloaded.
No "indecent images" were found then, and Peter was not charged in Germany. However, these images were found only after Peter returned to the UK.

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630645 to www.opg.me

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630618 to www.opg.me
1 LADY not needing a deputy




This is a lady that needs no deputy. This is a lady well educated that I have spoken to at length. THIS is just CoP crime at its absolute worst. We are coming for you!

MAY 6 2016 Visiter No.630612 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630590 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630585 to www.opg.me

MAY 5 2016 Visiter No.630580 to www.opg.me
LAWFUL REBELLION under article 61 of the

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630555 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630552 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630550 to www.opg.me

MAY 4 2016 Visiter No.630547 to www.opg.me

MAY 3 2016 Visiter No.630527 to www.opg.me

MAY 2 2016 Visiter No.630500 to www.opg.me

MAY 1 2016 Visiter No.630434 to www.opg.me

MAY 1 2016 Visiter No.630415 to www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2016 Visiter No.630370 to www.opg.me

APRIL 29 2016 Visiter No.630360 to www.opg.me

APRIL 28 2016 Visiter No.630320 to www.opg.me

APRIL 28 2016 Visiter No.630318 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630294 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630286 to www.opg.me

Trust me the next scandal on the horizon will be the court of 'protection' and as a prediction is proof that the courts, JEWdiciary, police, establishment have learned nothing as it is still going on in HEAPS of abundance.

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630268 to www.opg.me

APRIL 27 2016 Visiter No.630249 to www.opg.me

APRIL 26 2016 Visiter No.630236 to www.opg.me

APRIL 25 2016 Visiter No.630200 to www.opg.me

APRIL 24 2016 Visiter No.630129 to www.opg.me

In a stitch up by the court of so called 'protection' who want to silence the whistleblower carer son of his 75yr. mothers estate being plundered by them, the court incite press to deliberately print a manufactured story to suit their own objectives in covering up their frauds when the old lady has capacity that can be proved and where money hungry relatives jump on the bandwagon to play to the courts tune.

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630110 to www.opg.me

THE UK IS A COMMON LAW JURISDICTION - Magna Carta 1215 = The Great Charter and Due Process is by Trial by our Peers and LAWFUL representation of our own choosing:
Therefore, Mrs 'Justice' Aspin and her judicial working group has NO jurisdiction whatsoever to draw up any consultation regarding, We the People, as the UK judiciary have Sworn an Oath to be our Public Servants and have NO authority to operate courts without juries or make rules to OPPRESS, We the People, which is High Treason:
"A judicial working group led by Mrs Justice Asplin (pictured) drew up the consultation."
"On the issue of non-fee charging McKenzie friends, the judiciary said that current practice guidance does not have the force of law, and should be replaced with rules of court."
"the judiciary also recommends that all McKenzie friends sign up to a code of conduct, and that rules governing the courts’ approach to McKenzie friends be legally codified."
NOTE: Legally codified is not LAWFULLY codified:
COMMON LAW ← has been replaced with → MARITIME LAW = the People cannot win
TRIAL BY JURY ← has been replaced with → SUMMARY JUDGEMENT = the People cannot win
LAWFUL ADVICE ← has been replaced with → LEGAL ADVICE = the People cannot win
It is high time that the UK Judiciary started honouring their Oath to, We the People, and started acting LAWFULLY under the WRITTEN Constitutional Common Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Legal Advice and the UK Judiciary.

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630098 to www.opg.me

APRIL 23 2016 Visiter No.630090 to www.opg.me

APRIL 22 2016 Visiter No.630030 to www.opg.me

APRIL 21 2016 Visiter No.629978 to www.opg.me

LETTER to Gove requiring a public inquiry here

APRIL 19 2016 Visiter No.629945 to www.opg.me

“The Official State Office Known As "PERSON"
This is the single most important lesson that you MUST learn. If you spend an hour to learn this material you will be rewarded for the rest of your life.
The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings. See e. g. 1 U. S. C. sec 1. Church of Scientology v. U. S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612 F. 2d 417, 425.
One of the very first of your STATE statutes will have a section listed entitled "Definitions." Carefully study this section of the statutes and you will find a portion that reads similar to this excerpt.
In construing these statutes and each and every word, phrase, or part hereof, where the context will permit:
(1) The singular includes the plural and vice versa.
(2) Gender-specific language includes the other gender and neuter.
(3) The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, eSTATEs, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations.
Under the rule of construction "expressio unius est exclusio alterius," where a statute or Constitution enumerates the things on which it is to operate or forbids certain things, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from its operation all those not expressly mentioned.
Generally words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. When a statute does not specifically define words, such words should be construed in their common or ordinary sense to the effect that the rules used in construing statutes are also applicable in the construction of the Constitution. It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that words of common usage when used in a statute should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense.
If you carefully read the statute laws enacted by your STATE legislature you will also notice that they are all written with phrases similar to these five examples :
1. A person commits the offense of failure to carry a license if the person ...
2. A person commits the offense of failure to register a vehicle if the person ...
3. A person commits the offense of driving uninsured if the person ...
4. A person commits the offense of fishing if the person ...
5. A person commits the offense of breathing if the person ...
Notice that only "persons" can commit these STATE legislature created crimes. A crime is by definition an offense committed against the "STATE." If you commit an offense against a human, it is called a tort. Examples of torts would be any personal injury, slander, or defamation of character.
So how does someone become a "person" and subject to regulation by STATE statutes and laws?
There is only one way. Contract! You must ask the STATE for permission to volunteer to become a STATE person. You must volunteer because the U. S. Constitution forbids the STATE from compelling you into slavery. This is found in the 13th and 14th Amendments.
13th Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United STATEs, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
14th Amendment: Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the STATE wherein they reside. No STATE shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any STATE deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
You become a STATE created statutory "person" by taking up residency with the STATE and stepping into the office of "person." You must hold an "office" within the STATE government in order for that STATE government to regulate and control you. First comes the legislatively created office, then comes their control. If you do not have an office in STATE government, the legislature's control over you would also be prohibited by the Declaration of Rights section, usually found to be either Section I or II, of the STATE Constitution.
The most common office held in a STATE is therefore the office known as "person." Your STATE legislature created this office as a way to control people. It is an office most people occupy without even knowing that they are doing so.
The legislature cannot lawfully control you because you are a flesh and blood human being. God alone created you and by Right of Creation, He alone can control you. It is the nature of Law, that what One creates, One controls. This natural Law is the force that binds a creature to its creator. God created us and we are, therefore, subject to His Laws, whether or not we acknowledge Him as our Creator.
The way the STATE gets around God's Law and thereby controls the People is by creating only an office, and not a real human. This office is titled as "person" and then the legislature claims that you are filling that office. Legislators erroneously now think that they can make laws that also control men. They create entire bodies of laws - motor vehicle code, building code, compulsory education laws, and so on ad nauseum. They still cannot control men or women, but they can now control the office they created. And look who is sitting in that office -- YOU.
Then they create government departments to administer regulations to these offices. Within these administrative departments of STATE government are hundreds of other STATE created offices. There is everything from the office of janitor to the office of governor. But these administrative departments cannot function properly unless they have subjects to regulate.
The legislature obtains these subjects by creating an office that nobody even realizes to be an official STATE office.
They have created the office of "person."
The STATE creates many other offices such as police officer, prosecutor, judge etc. and everyone understands this concept. However, what most people fail to recognize and understand is the most common STATE office of all, the office of "person." Anyone filling one of these STATE offices is subject to regulation by their creator, the STATE legislature. Through the STATE created office of "person," the STATE gains its authority to regulate, control and judge you, the real human. What they have done is apply the natural law principle, "what one creates, one controls."
A look in Webster's dictionary reveals the origin of the word "person." It literally means "the mask an actor wears."
The legislature creates the office of "person" which is a mask. They cannot create real people, only God can do that. But they can create the "office" of "person," which is merely a mask, and then they persuade a flesh and blood human being to put on that mask by offering a fictitious privilege, such as a driver license. Now the legislature has gained complete control over both the mask and the actor behind the mask.
A resident is another STATE office holder.
All STATE residents hold an office in the STATE government.
But not everyone who is a resident also holds the office of "person."
Some residents hold the office of judge and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of prosecutors and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of police office(rs) and they are not persons.
Some residents hold the office of legislators and they are not persons.
Some residents are administrators and bureaucrats and they also are not persons.
Some residents are attorneys and they also are not persons.
An attorney is a STATE officer of the court and is firmly part of the judicial branch. The attorneys will all tell you that they are "licensed" to practice law by the STATE Supreme Court. Therefore, it is unlawful for any attorney to hold any position or office outside of the judicial branch. There can be no attorney legislators - no attorney mayors - no attorneys as police - no attorneys as governor. Yes, I know it happens all the time, however, this practice of multiple office holding by attorneys is prohibited by the individual State and U.S. Constitutions and is a felony in most STATEs.
If you read farther into your STATE constitution you will find a clause stating this, the Separation of Powers, which will essentially read as follows:
Branches of government -- The powers of the STATE government shall be divided into legislative, executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided herein.
Therefore, a police officer cannot arrest a prosecutor, a prosecutor cannot prosecute a sitting judge, a judge cannot order the legislature to perform and so on.
Because these "offices" are not persons, the STATE will not, and cannot prosecute them, therefore they enjoy almost complete protection by the STATE in the performance of their daily duties. This is why it is impossible to sue or file charges against most government employees. If their crimes should rise to the level where they "shock the community" and cause alarm in the people, then they will be terminated from STATE employment and lose their absolute protection. If you carefully pay attention to the news, you will notice that these government employees are always terminated from their office or STATE employment and then are they arrested, now as a common person, and charged for their crimes. Simply put, the STATE will not eat its own.
The reason all STATE residents hold an office is so the STATE can control everything. It wants to create every single office so that all areas of your life are under the complete control of the STATE. Each office has prescribed duties and responsibilities and all these offices are regulated and governed by the STATE. If you read the fine print when you apply for a STATE license or privilege you will see that you must sign a declaration that you are in fact a "resident" of that STATE.
"Person" is a subset of resident. Judge is a subset of resident. Legislator and police officer are subsets of resident. If you hold any office in the STATE, you are a resident and subject to all legislative decrees in the form of statutes.
They will always say that we are free men. But they will never tell you that the legislatively created offices that you are occupying are not free.
They will say, "All men are free," because that is a true statement.
What they do not say is, that holding any STATE office binds free men into slavery for the STATE. They are ever ready to trick you into accepting the STATE office of "person," and once you are filling that office, you cease to be free men. You become regulated creatures, called persons, totally created by the legislature. You will hear "free men" mentioned all the time, but you will never hear about "free persons."
If you build your life in an office created by the legislature, it will be built on shifting sands. The office can be changed and manipulated at any time to conform to the whims of the legislature. When you hold the office of "person" created by the legislature, your office isn't fixed. Your duties and responsibilities are ever changing. Each legislative session binds a "person" to ever more burdens and requirements in the form of more rules, laws and statutes.
Most STATE constitutions have a section that declares the fundamental power of the People: Political power -- All political power is inherent in the People. The enunciation herein of certain Rights shall not be construed to deny or impair others retained by the People.
Notice that this says "people" it does not say persons. This statement declares beyond any doubt that the People are Sovereign over their created government. This is natural law of creation and the natural flow of delegated power.
A Sovereign is a private, non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, non-individual, NOT SUBJECT to any real or imaginary statutory regulations or quasi laws enacted by any STATE legislature which was created by the People.
When you are pulled over by the police, roll down your window and say, "You are speaking to a Sovereign political power holder. I do not consent to you detaining me. Why are you detaining me against my will?"
Now the STATE office of policeman knows that "IT" is talking to a flesh and blood Sovereign. The police officer cannot cite a Sovereign because the STATE legislature can only regulate what they create. And the STATE does not create Sovereign political power holders. It is very important to lay the proper foundation, Right from the beginning. Let the police officer know that you are a Sovereign. Remain in your proper office of Sovereign political power holder. Do not leave it. Do not be persuaded by police pressure or tricks to put on the mask of a STATE "person."
Why aren't Sovereigns subject to the STATE's charges? Because of the concept of office. The STATE is attempting to prosecute only a particular office known as "person." If you are not in that STATE created office of "person," the STATE statutes simply do not apply to you. This is common sense, for example, if you are not in the STATE of Texas, then Texas laws do not apply to you. For the STATE to control someone, they have to first create the office. Then they must coerce a warm-blooded creature to come fill that office. They want you to fill that office.
Here is the often expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the word person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U. S. 653, 667 (1979) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U. S. 600, 604 (1941)). See also United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U. S. 258, 275 (1947).
The idea that the word "person" ordinarily excludes the Sovereign can also be traced to the "familiar principle that the King is not bound by any act of Parliament unless he be named therein by special and particular words." Dollar Savings Bank v. United STATEs, 19 Wall. 227, 239 (1874).
As this passage suggests, however, this interpretive principle applies only to "the enacting Sovereign." United States v. California, 297 U. S. 175, 186 (1936). See also Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 460 U. S. 150, 161, n. 21 (1983).
Furthermore, as explained in United States v. Herron, 20 Wall. 251, 255 (1874), even the principle as applied to the enacting Sovereign is not without limitations: "Where an act of Parliament is made for the public good, as for the advancement of religion and justice or to prevent injury and wrong, the king is bound by such act, though not particularly named therein; but where a statute is general, and thereby any prerogative, Right, title, or interest is divested or taken from the king, in such case the king is not bound, unless the statute is made to extend to him by express words."
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Holmes explained: "A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends." Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U. S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907).
The majority of American STATEs fully embrace the Sovereign immunity theory as well as the federal government. See Restatement (Second) of Torts 895B, comment at 400 (1979).
The following U. S. Supreme Court case makes clear all these principals.
I shall have occasion incidentally to evince, how true it is, that STATEs and governments were made for man; and at the same time how true it is, that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and at last oppressed their master and maker.
... A STATE, useful and valuable as the contrivance is, is the inferior contrivance of man; and from his native dignity derives all its acquired importance. ...
Let a STATE be considered as subordinate to the people: But let everything else be subordinate to the STATE. The latter part of this position is equally necessary with the former. For in the practice, and even at length, in the science of politics there has very frequently been a strong current against the natural order of things, and an inconsiderate or an interested disposition to sacrifice the end to the means. As the STATE has claimed precedence of the people; so, in the same inverted course of things, the government has often claimed precedence of the STATE; and to this perversion in the second degree, many of the volumes of confusion concerning Sovereignty owe their existence. The ministers, dignified very properly by the appellation of the magistrates, have wished, and have succeeded in their wish, to be considered as the Sovereigns of the STATE. This second degree of perversion is confined to the old world, and begins to diminish even there: but the first degree is still too prevalent even in the several STATES, of which our union is composed. By a STATE I mean, a complete body of free persons united together for their common benefit, to enjoy peaceably what is their own, and to do justice to others. It is an artificial person. It has its affairs and its interests: It has its rules: It has its Rights: and it has its obligations. It may acquire property distinct from that of its members. It may incur debts to be discharged out of the public stock, not out of the private fortunes of individuals. It may be bound by contracts; and for damages arising from the breach of those contracts. In all our contemplations, however, concerning this feigned and artificial person, we should never forget, that, in truth and nature, those who think and speak and act, are men. Is the foregoing description of a STATE a true description? It will not be questioned, but it is. .... See Our Enemy The State
It will be sufficient to observe briefly, that the Sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the Sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority; and from his grace and grant derives all franchise, immunities and privileges; it is easy to perceive that such a Sovereign could not be amenable to a court of justice, or subjected to judicial control and actual constraint. It was of necessity, therefore, that suability, became incompatible with such Sovereignty. Besides, the prince having all the executive powers, the judgment of the courts would, in fact, be only monitory, not mandatory to him, and a capacity to be advised, is a distinct thing from a capacity to be sued. The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the prince and the subject.
"No such ideas obtain here (speaking of America): at the revolution, the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the Sovereigns of the country, but they are Sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called) and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the Sovereignty." Chisholm v. Georgia (February Term, 1793) 2 U. S. 419, 2 Dall. 419, 1 L. Ed 440. There are many ways you can give up your Sovereign power and accept the role of "person." One is by receiving STATE benefits. Another is by asking permission in the form of a license or permit from the STATE.
One of the subtlest ways of accepting the role of "person," is to answer the questions of bureaucrats. When a STATE bureaucrat knocks on your door and wants to know why your children aren't registered in school, or a police officer pulls you over and starts asking questions, you immediately fill the office of "person" if you start answering their questions.
It is for this reason that you should ignore or refuse to "answer" their questions and instead act like a true Sovereign, a King or Queen, and ask only your own questions of them.
You are not a "person" subject to their laws.
If they persist and haul you into their court unlawfully, your response to the judge is simple and direct, you the Sovereign, must tell him:
I have no need to answer you in this matter.
It is none of your business whether I understand my Rights or whether I understand your fictitious charges.
It is none of your business whether I want counsel.
The reason it is none of your business is because I am not a person regulated by the STATE. I do not hold any position or office where I am subject to the legislature. The STATE legislature does not dictate what I do.
I am a free Sovereign "Man"(or woman) and I am a political power holder as lawfully decreed in the STATE Constitution at article I (or II) and that constitution is controlling over you.
You must NEVER retain or hire an attorney, a STATE officer of the court, to speak or file written documents for you. Use an attorney (if you must) only for counsel and advice about their "legal" system. If you retain an attorney to represent you and speak in your place, you become "NON COMPOS MENTIS", not mentally competent, and you are then considered a ward of the court. You LOSE all your Rights, and you will not be permitted to do anything herein.
The judge knows that as long as he remains in his office, he is backed by the awesome power of the STATE, its lawyers, police and prisons. The judge w ill try to force you to abandon your Sovereign sanctuary by threatening you with jail. No matter what happens, if you remain faithful to your Sovereignty, The judge and the STATE may not lawfully move against you.
The STATE did not create the office of Sovereign political power holder. Therefore, they do not regulate and control those in the office of Sovereign. They cannot ascribe penalties for breach of that particular office. The reason they have no authority over the office of the Sovereign is because they did not create it and the Sovereign people did not delegate to them any such power.
When challenged, simply remind them that they do not regulate any office of the Sovereign and that their statutes only apply to those STATE employees in legislative created offices.
This Sovereign individual paradigm is explained by the following U. S. Supreme Court case: "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the STATE, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the STATE, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. S. 43 at 47 (1905).
Let us analyze this case. It says, "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights." It does not say, "Sit on his Rights." There is a principle here: "If you don't use 'em you lose 'em." You have to assert your Rights, demand them, "stand upon" them.
Next it says, "He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way." It says "private business" - you have a Right to operate a private business. Then it says "in his own way." It doesn't say "in the government's way."
Then it says, "His power to contract is unlimited." As a Sovereign individual, your power to contract is unlimited. In common law there are certain criteria that determine the validity of contracts. They are not important here, except that any contract that would harm others or violate their Rights would be invalid. For example, a "contract" to kill someone is not a valid contract. Apart from this obvious qualification, your power to contract is unlimited.
Next it says, "He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the STATE, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property." The court case contrasted the duty of the corporation (an entity created by government permission - feudal paradigm) to the duty of the Sovereign individual. The Sovereign individual doesn't need and didn't receive permission from the government, hence has no duty to the government.
Then it says, "His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the STATE." This is very important. The Supreme Court recognized that humans have inherent Rights. The U. S. Constitution (including the Bill of Rights) does not grant us Rights. We have fundamental Rights, irrespective of what the Constitution says. The Constitution acknowledges some of our Rights. And Amendment IX STATEs, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain Rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The important point is that our Rights antecede (come before, are senior to) the organization of the STATE.
Next the Supreme Court says, "And [his Rights] can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution." Does it say the government can take away your Rights? No! Your Rights can only be taken away "by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution." "Due process of law" involves procedures and safeguards such as trial by jury. "Trial By Jury" means, inter alia, the jury judges both law and fact.
Then the case says, "Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law." These are some of the Rights of a Sovereign individual. Sovereign individuals need not report anything about themselves or their businesses to anyone.
Finally, the Supreme Court says, "He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." The Sovereign individual does not have to pay taxes.
If you should discuss Hale v. Henkel with a run-of-the-mill attorney, he or she will tell you that the case is "old" and that it has been "overturned." If you ask that attorney for a citation of the case or cases that overturned Hale v. Henkel, there will not be a meaningful response. We have researched Hale v. Henkel and here is what we found :
"We know that Hale v. Henkel was decided in 1905 in the U. S. Supreme Court.
Since it was the Supreme Court, the case is binding on all courts of the land, until another Supreme Court case says it isn't. Has another Supreme Court case overturned Hale v. Henkel? The answer is NO. As a matter of fact, since 1905, the Supreme Court has cited Hale v. Henkel a total of 144 times. A fact more astounding is that since 1905, Hale v. Henkel has been cited by all of the federal and STATE appellate court systems a total of over 1600 times. None of the various issues of this case has ever been overruled.
So if the STATE through the office of the judge continues to threaten or does imprison you, they are trying to force you into the STATE created office of "person." As long as you continue to claim your Rightful office of Sovereign, the STATE lacks all jurisdiction over you. The STATE needs someone filling the office of "person" in order to continue prosecuting a case in their courts.
A few weeks in jail puts intense pressure upon most "persons." Jail means the loss of job opportunities, separation from loved ones, and the piling up of debts. Judges will apply this pressure when they attempt to arraign you. When brought in chains before a crowded courtroom the issue of counsel will quickly come up and you can tell the court you are In Propria Persona or simply "PRO PER", as yourself and you need no other.
Do not sign their papers or cooperate with them because most things about your life are private and are not the STATE's business to evaluate. Here is the Sovereign People's command in the constitution that the STATE respect their privacy:
Right of privacy -- Every man or woman has the Right to be let alone and free from governmental intrusion into their private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the public's Right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law. See U.S. Constitution, Ninth Amendment
If the judge is stupid enough to actually follow through with his threats and send you to jail, you will soon be released without even being arraigned and all charges will be dropped. You will then have documented prima facie grounds for false arrest and false imprisonment charges against him personally.
Now that you know the hidden evil in the word "person", try to stop using it in everyday conversation. Simply use the correct term, MAN or WOMAN. Train yourself, your family and your friends to never use the derogatory word "person" ever again.
This can be your first step in the journey to get yourself free from all STATE control

APRIL 18 2016 Visiter No.629814 to www.opg.me

APRIL 18 2016 Visiter No.629800 to www.opg.me
click to enlarge

Mike Clarke when birds of a feather flock together ie the theiving CoP and siblings this is the result after 20 years of looking after mum

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629772 to www.opg.me
STATEMENT by[sister daughter]ANGELA WILD &[brother son]KEVIN CLARKE

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629770 to www.opg.me
Dave John Clapham
Bias and the appearance of bias
3.7 The question whether an appearance of bias or possible conflict of interest is sufficient to disqualify a Justice from taking part in a particular case is the subject of United Kingdom and Strasbourg jurisprudence which will guide the Justices in specific situations. Recent UK cases include Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357, Locobail (UK) Ltd v Bayfield Properties Ltd [2002] QB 451, Re Medicaments and Related Classes of Goods (No.2) [2001] 1 WLR 700 and Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] 1 WLR 2416.
3.8 Circumstances will vary infinitely and guidelines can do no more than seek to assist the individual Justice in the judgment to be made, which involves, by virtue of the authorities, considering the perception the fair-minded and informed observer would have. What follows are merely signposts to some of the questions which may arise.
3.9 A Justice will not sit in a case where:
he or she has a close family relationship with a party or with the spouse or domestic partner of a partner; his or her spouse or domestic partner was a judge in a court below; he or she has a close family relationship with an advocate appearing before the Supreme Court.
3.10 Sufficient reasons for not sitting on a case include:
personal friendship with, or personal animosity towards, a party; friendship is to be distinguished from acquaintance, which may or may not be a sufficient reason depending upon its nature and extent; current or recent business association with a party; this includes the Justice's own solicitor, accountant, doctor, dentist or other professional adviser; it does not normally include the Justice's insurance company, bank or a local authority to which he or she pays council tax.
3.11 Reasons which are unlikely to be sufficient for a Justice not to sit on a case, but will depend upon the circumstances, include:
friendship or past professional association with counsel or solicitors acting for a party; the fact that a relative of the Justice is a partner in, or employee of, a firm of solicitors or other professional advisers involved in a case; much will depend upon the extent to which that relative is involved in or affected by the result in the case; past professional association with a party as a client; much will depend upon how prolonged, close, or recent that association was.
3.12 A Justice will not sit in a case in which he or she or, to his or her knowledge, a member of his or her family has any significant financial interest in the outcome of the case. 'Family' for this purpose means spouse, domestic partner or other person in a close personal relationship with the Justice; son, son-in-law, daughter, daughter-in-law; and anyone else who is a companion or employee living in the Justice's household. It is for the Justice to inform himself or herself about his or her personal financial and fiduciary interests and to take reasonable steps to be informed about the interests of members of his or her family.
3.13 A significant financial interest could arise, not from an interest in the outcome of the particular case, but where the decision on the point of law might have an impact upon the Justice's own financial interests. The Justice will have regard to the nature and extent of his or her interest and the effect of the decision on others with whom he or she has a relationship, actual or foreseeable.
3.14 Previous participation in public office or public debate on matters relevant to an issue in a case will not normally be a cause for a Justice not to sit, unless the Justice has thereby committed himself or herself to a particular view irrespective of the arguments presented to the Court. This risk will seldom, if ever, arise from what a judge has said in other cases, or from previous findings against a party in other litigation.
3.15 If circumstances which may give rise to a suggestion of bias, or the appearance of bias, are present, they should be disclosed to the parties well before the hearing, if possible. Otherwise the parties may be placed in a difficult position when deciding whether or not to proceed. Sometimes, however, advance notification may not be possible.
3.16 Disclosure should be to all parties and, unless the issue has been resolved before the hearing, discussion should be in open court. Even where the parties consent to the Justice sitting, the Justice should refuse himself or herself if, on balance, he or she considers that this is the proper course. Conversely, there are likely to be cases in which the Justice has thought it appropriate to bring the circumstances to the attention of the parties but, having considered any submissions, is entitled to and may rightly decide to proceed notwithstanding the lack of consent.

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629752 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629750 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629743 to www.opg.me
“We were very concerned by what we heard about the safeguards. The evidence suggests that tens of thousands of people are being deprived of their liberty without the protection of the law, and without the protection that Parliament intended. Worse still, in some cases the safeguards are being wilfully used to oppress individuals and to force decisions upon them. The Government needs to go back to the drawing board to draft replacement provisions that are easy to understand and implement, and in keeping with the style and ethos of the Mental Capacity Act.”
Lord Hardie, House of Lords Mental Capacity Act Committee report

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629740 to www.opg.me
click to enlarge

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629737 to www.opg.me

APRIL 17 2016 Visiter No.629725 to www.opg.me

APRIL 16 2016 Visiter No.629700 to www.opg.me
EU vote OUT get OUT & stay OUT for the sake of your children

APRIL 15 2016 Visiter No.629650 to www.opg.me


APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629614 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629600 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629595 to www.opg.me

Guy documents on video the terrorist ordeal of what is going down in United Kingdom courts systems.

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629590 to www.opg.me

APRIL 14 2016 Visiter No.629580 to www.opg.me

APRIL 13 2016 Visiter No.629540 to www.opg.me

APRIL 13 2016 Visiter No.629526 to www.opg.me
In this order from the court it shows how the court will use relatives to back their objectives which is especially easy when ''birds of a feather flock together''.
I have previously documented my sisters actions of theft upon her own mother.
Here I will document in more detail.
REPLY here

APRIL 12 2016 Visiter No.629500 to www.opg.me

APRIL 11 2016 Visiter No.629460 to www.opg.me


FACEBOOK link here

12.4.2016 Michael Cray's facebook page has just been taken down this morning whooo ray we are onto this criminal thus who lives in PEMBROKESHIRE.

APRIL 11 2016 Visiter No.629445 to www.opg.me

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629425 to www.opg.me
COPY To: Mike: Clarke
Date: April 10, 2016 at 8:41 PM Subject: Dear judge.
My name is Steven Power and as well as being a long term friend of the Clark family I'm the Builder charged with maintaining the property at 31 Cherry Tree Road Blackpool.
Being aware of the dispute between family members regarding the sale of the property I felt as the Builder I should inform you of the current situation.
About 8 months ago Mr Michael Clarke asked me if is as a friend and due to his lack of funds I would be prepared at my expense to bring the property up to a saleable level and then market it on their behalf.
I agreed to do this on condition that my bill would be paid out of the proceeds of the sale.
At the time the property has stood empty for approximately 18 months and was in a very poor state, slates and come off the roof and rain water had brought some of the ceilings down amongst numerous other defects.
I estimated it would cost approximately £15,000 to put the property back to a habitable condition in any event I carried out all the very basic repairs I deemed necessary to make it saleable at a cost of £2,000
After numerous viewings an offer of £180,000 was received this was reduced to £170,000 after receipt of the survey paid for by the perspective purchaser.
In spite of a very thorough Surveyors report highlighting all the problems with the property the purchasers are still very keen to buy it with a cash offer of £170,000
In my view this is I a extremely good offer and is unlikely to be repeated in the future as the property is slowly deteriorating.
Having discussed the deteriorating state of the property with Angela Clarke she informed me that she has no problem with selling the bungalow provided the funds are put into the court for distribution as the court sees fit.
Having known the family in excess of 35 years and being fully aware of the family's dispute regarding Ann Clarke it is my opinion that she will never be returning to the UK and in the unlikely event that she does would not be able to afford to bring the property up to a habitable standard.
Furthermore the property is currently uninsured and has been for some years. There is an ever increasing council tax liability, and the longer it remains empty the more maintenance it will require.
In short a financial liability. I have attached the surveyors report to give you some insight to the reality of the situation.
ON THE ABOVE FAO the foreign office via British Consulate Dominic for select committee or a LORD or MP that will ACT!
TAKE NOTE: from mike@rake.net
i man mike@rake.net do strongly object and demand in the highest possible terms that the court of protection play absolutely NO FURTHER future role in mums affairs.
THEY have attempted to take us as UK prisoners. ALL documented on our website www.opg.me
OUR suffering continues daily.SURVEYfor31.pdf

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629410 to www.opg.me

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629400 to www.opg.me
Grandma B's only wish was to spend her remaining years living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son Peter.
Sadly, a criminal gang centred around North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services had a different future for her in mind. They seized and attempted to fraudulently sell her house. She fought this through the due process of law. To prevent her from litigating, her abusers kidnapped her in May 2014. When her son Peter went to court to get her back in his care, he was ambushed in the court doorway and has been held unlawfully in jail ever since.
Grandma B's house has now been fraudulently sold. The sinister and secretive Court of Protection now plans to issue a Deprivation of Liberty Order to prevent her friends from contacting her. The next court hearing is on 13th April 2016 at York County Court. (Case No. 12530345.) Please attend to show your support of Grandma B - and be prepared to insist on getting access to the courtroom.

APRIL 10 2016 Visiter No.629390 to www.opg.me

APRIL 9 2016 Visiter No.629385 to www.opg.me
There are 350,000 freemasons in Britain. If you get to the 33rd degree like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown or David Cameron you are then in the running to be a Bilderberger.
Bilderbergers are a higher, international, more exclusive level of freemasonry, only 140 strong, and their agenda is to build the EU dictatorship. Every Prime Minister since Edward Heath has been a Bilderberger, and they have controlled the leadership of the Conservative party since the late 1960's.
The Rothschilds and the Queen are members of the top two levels; and our German Royal Family (real name Saxe-Coburg Gotha; Windsor is an adopted name) has always been head of freemasonry.
Nearly all British judges and Law Lords are Freemasons; so are most barristers, which is why miscarriages of justice are the norm in our now utterly corrupt British Courts.
Judges and Freemasonry barristers usually decide the outcome of a case to suit their own agenda beforehand. That agenda is often implementing the Frankfurt School subversion technique of "trauma through injustice," particularly in our now secret family courts, where they snatch 4,500 children annually from good parents for forced adoption. The Daily Mail covers a tiny number of those cases.
Our corrupt freemasonry Law Lords refuse to rule the EU wholly illegal under our British constitution, which it is. They lead the pretence our written British constitution is unwritten, to render it worthless.
Current Conservative Bilderbergers include Francis Maude and Ken Clarke, apparently a DVD agent too; David Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne. Lib Dems: Nick Clegg. Labour: Ed Balls, David Millliband (DVD too), Peter Mandleson, John Sainsbury, Philip Gould; Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. These evil men are deliberately destroying us every day.
Newspapers are censored for legal reasons by freemasonry lawyers or Common Purpose members; and the BBC has 400 Common Purpose staff censoring out anti-EU news, which is why they didn't report that Westminster gave up the last 20% of its power in January 2009, and now only exists to help the press conceal what has happened, until the EU dictatorship has consolidated its power.

APRIL 9 2016 Visiter No.629363 to www.opg.me

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629320 to www.opg.me
Thank you Dominic of the consulate
In you I trust.
I can further confirm that as of yesterday mum has been released from hospital and is back in my care.
Having said that she is still quite delicate and I am hoping that her release is the start of a full recovery.
Our situation is still of course very precarious and the lack of action from our MP on this matter is very troubling.
More recently mums disability benefit has been stopped and my carers allowance, providing even more added pressure daily.
I am of the understanding that if this matter is put before the parliamentary select committee that any MP so willing can take up the case.
Might it be possible that this matter can be raised by the FOREIGN OFFICE to the select committee??
Alternatively I am also of the understanding that if a LORD takes up the matter he can instruct an MP to ACT!
THE situation is an in depth one which stems as previously told from corruption being covered up by court of protection officials and judiciary whom are not wishing to deal with the allegations to hand and thus forth rely on a fraudulent court setting of harassment, in order to silence the carer for whistleblowing, into prison or he is coerced into apologising for a sworn on oath statement of truth 'COMMERCIAL LIEN' notarised, of which I cannot do, as I would be in contempt of such truth.
I cannot be in contempt of the court and of the truth??
JUDGE JACKSONs responsibility to the 7 principles of PUBLIC LIFE he has failed on all counts.

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629317 to www.opg.me
From: mike rake.net [mailto:mike@rake.net] Sent: 07 April 2016 17:29
To: Dominic Jackson
Are my emails being forwarded to the foreign office and MP because as of yet there has been absolutely NO RESPONSE from anyone?

from dominic.jackson@fco.gov.uk Dominic BRITISH CONSULATE MALAGA SPAIN
To mike@rake.net
Dear Mike
Rest assured I am forwarding all the emails you are asking to be forwarded to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office to colleagues in London and I have asked them to ensure Gordon Marsden MP is informed.
I will endeavour to follow-up with them and find out if they are able to reply.

APRIL 8 2016 Visiter No.629315 to www.opg.me

1. Selflessness
Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.
2. Integrity
Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.
3. Objectivity
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.
4. Accountability
Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.
5. Openness
Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.
6. Honesty
Holders of public office should be truthful.
7. Leadership
Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs.
All demonstrating clearly that his honour Mr Justice Jackson has a BIASED streak that runs right through his body that clearly is violating all the basic principles of holding public office.

APRIL 7 2016 Visiter No.629280 to www.opg.me

APRIL 7 2016 Visiter No.629270 to www.opg.me

Talmudic law imposes the will of the court.

APRIL 6 2016 Visiter No.629237 to www.opg.me
-----Original Message-----
From: Alpha14 To: Undisclosed Recipients
Sent: Tue, Apr 5, 2016 09:43 AM
This is a vitally important matter. Please forward to every person you know.
In 1960, the Lord Chancellor Lord Kilmuir wrote to Edward Heath advising him that if Britain joined the European Economic Community, it would be contrary to English Constitutional Law.
Heath went ahead anyway and in 1972 signed the European Communities Act (ECA) in full knowledge that he was treasonably committing Britain to foreign rule over the heads of the people whom he had deceived with lies that no sovereignty would be lost.
His signing the ECA was the most grievous act of high treason in British history. But it also rendered his government an unlawful assembly with no effect in law (as treason can have no effect in law) and as all subsequent parliaments have failed to reverse his treachery, they too have been unlawful assemblies having no legislative power, incapable of any lawful act of government.
Successive EU Treaties are therefore of no effect and Britain’s “membership” of the EU has been null and void from the outset.
The petition https:​//petition.​parliament.​uk/petitions/122770​ seeks to bring Lord Kilmuir’s letter out into the open so that its content would be debated in Parliament and be discussed openly in public as it has considerable bearing on Britain’s relationship with the EU, the billions of pounds we waste daily on the EU and the many thousands of illegal foreign “laws” with which we are unlawfully burdened every day. Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Heath appears below with comments in red by Joan Martin, Editor of S.O.S - Save Our Sovereignty.
Though the petition has a deadline after the date set for a British EU Referendum, there is no guarantee that the referendum result will reflect the people’s true intention or indeed the best outcome for Britain and our future generations.
The possibility of bringing this momentous issue sufficiently to the public’s attention rests entirely upon the willingness of the people themselves to forward it to everyone they know when every person has the right to be aware of such a serious matter effecting their lives but which has so far been deliberately withheld from them.
PLEASE send this email to your MP drawing particular attention to the following, ask his or her thoughts and let me know their response. Please also forward this very widely asking recipients to do likewise. Rex Poulton
alpha14@wewantourcountryback.​co.​uk​ -----Original Message-----
From: Sent: 31 March 2016 14:03 To: Subject: THE KILMUIR LETTER - THE PUBLIC NEED TO KNOW
The following was passed to me by the Editor, Joan Martin. Sonya S.O.S - Save Our Sovereignty Sovereignty - The ability to rule ourselves and make our own laws.
In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole of a very important field.
There is no constitutionally acceptable method of doing this because it would be tantamount to a total abrogation of their duty to govern us according to our laws and customs.
In answer to a letter from Edward Heath written on the 30 November 1960 Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, makes it plain that there are very real problems with the constitutional limitations imposed on Government that prevent our joining the EEC. He goes on to mention some ways in which the Constitution will conflict with Heath’s plans but also indicate ways of subverting the conflict.
The comments in red, interleaved in Lord Kilmuir’s letter, clearly show that the Heath Government was fully prepared to commit acts of sedition and treason in order to take the UK into the EEC. Unfortunately we do not have a copy of Heath’s original letter to Lord Kilmuir.
My Dear Ted,
You wrote to me on the 30th November about the constitutional implications of our becoming a party to the Treaty of Rome.
I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me.
I agree with you that there are important constitutional issues involved. I have no doubt that if we do sign the Treaty, we shall suffer some loss of sovereignty, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.
At the end of the day, the issue whether or not to join the European Economic Community must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious, that does not mean that I consider them conclusive.
I do, however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly what, from the constitutional point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised. He is clear that if we do sign the agreement with the EEC we will suffer some loss of Sovereignty.
This is clearly an act of Treason because our Constitution allows no such surrender of any part of our Constitution to a foreign power beyond the control of the Queen in parliament.
This is evidenced by the convention which says:-

(Parliament may do many things but what it may not do is surrender any of its rights to govern unless we have been defeated in war).
And the ruling given to King Edward 3rd in 1366 in which he was told that King John’s action in surrendering England to the Pope and ruling England as a Vassal King to Rome was illegal because England did not belong to John, he held it only in trust for those who followed him.
The money that the Pope was demanding as tribute was not to be paid because England’s Kings were NOT vassal Kings to the Pope nor was the money legitimately owed.
Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would, in my opinion, affect our sovereignty in three ways:-
a) Parliament would be required to surrender some of its functions to the organs of the community;
b) The Crown would be called upon to transfer part of its treaty-making power to those organs of the Community; The English Constitution confers treaty making powers on only the Sovereign. The Sovereign cannot transfer those powers to a foreign power nor even, to our own parliament because they are mere servants of the Monarch. Sovereignty itself cannot be given away as it resides with the people who entrust it to the Monarch for his/her lifetime and the Monarch is obliged by law to pass that sovereignty on to any successor as it was received.
c) Our courts of law would sacrifice some degree of independence by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the European Court of Justice.
It is a Praemunire to allow any case to be taken to a foreign court not under the control of the Sovereign. The European Court of Justice or the European Court of Human Rights are foreign courts not under the control of our Sovereign. Praemunire is a crime akin to Treason. The position of Parliament:
It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal Advisers that the Council could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and which would in fact become for us part of the law of the land.
There are two ways in which this requirement of the Treaty could in practice be implemented:-
It is a Praemunire to allow any laws or regulations not made by the Sovereign in parliament to take effect as law in England. This is illegal under the 1351 Treason Act, the 1351 Act of Praemunire (which was introduced by King Edward III because he believed it was an affront to his honour and dignity as King of England to have laws imposed upon his Kingdom by a foreign power, to have any of his subjects to be taken out of England to be tried in a foreign court or for his Bishops to excomminicate any of his subjects on the orders of the Pope), the Act of Praemunire 1392, the Act of Supremacy 1559, the Declaration and Bill of Rights 1688/9 and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council made regulations requiring action by us.
The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither itself nor its successors, we could only comply with our obligations under the Treaty if parliament abandoned its right of passing independent judgement on the legislative proposals put before it.
A parallel [to the position of Britain and the EU] would be, for instance, the constitutional convention whereby Parliament passed British North American Bills without question at the request of the Parliament of Canada.
In this respect Parliament here would have in substance, if not in form, abdicated its sovereign position and it would have pro tanto, to do the same for the Community.
No such power exists for parliament to do this.
This would be an act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act, a Praemunire under the 1351and 1392 Acts of Praemunire, an act of treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
It would in theory, be possible for Parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.
For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of powers even in wartime that we have ever experienced and I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons.
Whichever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts, but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the Community would be irrevocable.
We should therefore have to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the statute of Westminster.
In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the Council, or other appropriate organ of the Community, its substantive powers of legislating over the whole of a very important field.
There is no constitutionally acceptable method of doing this because it would be tantamount to a total abrogation of their duty to govern us according to our laws and customs.
And it would be an act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act, a Praemunire under the 1351 and 1392 Acts of Praemunire and treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Regarding Treaty-making powers:
The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly true. Some treaties such as GATT and OEEC restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereignty that, by signing the Treaty of Rome, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.
But to transfer to the Council or the Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.
There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of the sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.
To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully federal state.
I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.
Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved: as you know, treaty-making power is vested in the Crown.
Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation, to take two examples, and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents.
But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.
This is a surrender of our Sovereignty, a clear act of treason under the 1351 Treason Act and a Praemunire under the 1351 and 1392 Acts of Praemunire, it is treason under the 1559 Act of Supremacy, the 1688/9 Declaration and Bill of Rights and the Treason Felony Act 1848.
Independence of the Courts
There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another court and as I assume to be the implication of ‘refer’ -- to accept that court’s decision.
You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the independence and authority of our courts.
Of those three objections, the first two are by far the more important.
I must emphasise that in my view the surrenders of sovereignty involved are serious ones and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade Parliament or the public to accept them.
I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.
But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this state, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.
Having said this, I would emphasise once again that, although those constitutional considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.
In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make some sacrifices of sovereignty: my concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are being called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.
It is a Praemunire to subject Her Majesty’s Courts of Law to the domination of a foreign court outside of Her Majesty’s control.
Joan Martin

APRIL 5 2016 Visiter No.629210 to www.opg.me

APRIL 5 2016 Visiter No.629200 to www.opg.me


APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629180 to www.opg.me

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629170 to www.opg.me

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629164 to www.opg.me
12 March 12:29
Hi, i feel just like you do, by reading your profile, ---- im a very normal intelligent nice caring women, whos been that much set up and delibratly discriminated, over my dads care that i can no longer face living in England, ive had to be come a recluse down in ????, -- all by my self, because my local council would not leave me a lone for going to the papers---- they interviewed me and asked me to pay back dated bills from years ago, -- they even had a go at me for visiting USA? Had a go at me for changeing my name, that was done to stop the court of protection, -- when i had gone public, --- the stress i went through, i feel i deserve composation, ------ done it in my own way, --- now im off to ???? soon, like youve done, ------a cheap apartment will have to do from the banks in ????, --- just so i can move all my stuff out of UK, ---i will rent my apartment out in Uk. My plan is to comute across to ???, ????, ????, from ????, flights seem cheaper from there than UK, --- i would prefer to move all my belongings straight to ????, ----- but i think it could cost to much, will check this out first. Just hope its not to late to infest there.
Did you go to jail like me for going public?
The council told 3 big dirty lies to sentence me to jail, ---- if you google my name, Daily mail, --- its all one big cover up, they put loads of lies in, -----repeated from the council, i was not jailed for kidnapping dad at all, my brothers got him out for me, and we hide out from the police, i didnt even have time to get dad his own spending money from his bank, where i use to take my brother to check i was only takeing small amounts out for dads food, -- with me being a very succsessful retired business women, -- i was the only person who should have been allowed to be over my dads welfare, and finances, no way it should have been the council, even my x boyfriend a x city councilor had reported the city works department for financial fraud on the radio years before when he was a union rep, gun men where sent to his home. So i already had learned how curupt Stoke on trent council where.
İ was jailed for contempt, --- when i had learned that i had been sentenced for a pack of lies i realised i couldnt trust the Judge, i was to afraid to even attend any more court hearings, all the hard work i had put in writing to the Judge during the court of protection, --- its has if he hadnt read any thing i wrote, i had sent him email addresses, contacts, good references from extra professional carers to surport a CARE PACKAGE asked for by the judge but never allowed to be done, --- WE WHERE NEVER ALLOWED TO HAVE DAD ASSESSED İN HİS CARE HOME, TO ALLOW FOR A CARE PACKAGE, CARE MANAGER SAİD, Sorry because theres a court of protection on we cant allow this, ----???-- TOTAL SET UP.
3 Lies to sentence me where, ---1, i had electronicaly sent a leaflet i had produced about the court hearing to a local collage, not true, ----only truth was i had produced a leaflet, still got them, about how dad was locked up in the councils care home, with photos of me and him on holiday in Turkey, but it was not about court case. 2nd lie, said i had called the social worker a bitch in court, un true. 3nd lie, -- Said i had left abusive phone messages to council, --- i have kept all the paper work, --- the main message was very intelligent, ---- i had explained a bout how dads health condition would be affected by been locked in care, that by giving him to much coffee which they where doing, since our family have a allergy to coffee, it was causing my dads water infections, hence, they kept giving him antibiotics to try and cure this but me and dad where alergic to these too, ---- so at the end all the over medication killed him off, he died a lot sooner than he should have done, bumped off realy because they got sick of
--------fighting our family after the council had become deputys. ps. ---- Curuption facts----- council had froze all my dads bank money on our return from Turkey after we had kidnapped dad, which had caused dad to have a nervous break down not been able to spend his own money, he had been a very independent business man, own business, -- this helped his care break down, plus i cought a very bad flu virus coughing my head off, --- it was the damp council flat bedroom i was in what caused it, --- all this and brothers brain dead girl friend calling each morning caused our care break down, all because all my money was over Turkey, i ran out, and had to surrender my dad back in to respite, ---- if we had dads own money could have put him in day care centre supervised while i recoved from flu, ----- i will never forgive my self for trusting them curupt bastards who sectioned my dad all over again with them curupt DEPREATİON PAPERS, ----- with these DOLES FORMS, they dont look after peoples best interests which they are used for, --- instead they take away their best interests, ----- my dad was not lacking enough of his CAPACİTY TO MAKE HİS RİGHT DECİSİONS, ---- watch the video on my profile page, of my father locked up in the care home, me and brother are interviewing him on it to show he had enough Mental Capacity to be released back to his family. PS.------ iM A LİVİNG WİTNESS, ----- OLD PEOPLE DEFİNATLY ARE DRUGGED UP İN CARE HOMES TO MAKE THEM A LOT WORSE, ----- it happend to my dad in 5 care homes, i realized when i got him to Turkey after he had been in 3 care homes , ----- he no longer was behaving drugged up, me and dad where both shocked how well he improved, i had got my dad back, --- he improved 100% the 2 months he was in Turkey, he went for long walks a long sea front, he eat 3 big meals a day, -- only problem was his severe OCD, EATİNG DİSORDER, --- i realised there would only be me who could manage it, with a few breathing spaces, i had part time carers already in place i could pay for out my own money, even the American pastors wife a x nurse needed the money, she offerd to help out, -----but the free mason Judge would never allow it, dad was so happy in Turkey, ------ and the best place for Dementia people is definatly a place in the sun by the sea, --- not locked up like a animal.
You know what, you could even speak to my brother İvan on here, he agrees with me at first my dad didnt even look like he had dementia when they started the court of protection, my dad was eccentric like i am, -- it made him look mad, he wasnt that bad at all, his OCD, eating disorder was the worst thing, but with me having a tiny bit of it, i understood it, i could work with it, -- i was much better carer than the ones he had in the homes, --- they discriminated me so they could win the court case, i was set up on my supervised visits to my dad, even lied about what i said when i dropped his cross off, they even brought the police in to one of my meetings with dad in the care home, and lied said i had discussed the court case with my dad, al i did that day was i simply asked dad if he would like me to be his represensitive, --which he was entitled to with being under a doles--- depreation of capacity, -----dad was fully switched on with me, -- remember he replied, --- of couse you are my daughter. When the police bursed in the room, he cryed his eyes out, -- because he knew full well we where both been set up in order to win their court of protection, he also said to the police, -- if you do any thing with my daughter , shes done nothing wrong, -- if i get out of here i will personaly come down and burn your police station down.---- When i phoned him 4 days later, he burst out crying soon as they passed him the phone, --- this type of thing continued, --- the carers where like witches, --- they must have been payed bonuses to lie and say to the court of protection that i was being a trouble maker and it was me makeing my dad cry, he must have had fights with the staff, because they used to phone my brother to say my dad was getting agressive so they had to sedate him, --- i later read in my dads medical records he had had a heart attack in that care home, no wonder, he wanted to come home to me, he had even told this to the court of protection solicitor who was brought in to represent my dad, --- this in its self is conflict of interest, because the solicitor---- Kate Jackson from Anthony and Collins was definatly in with our council, they al went in their little court rooms together with the court judge before our court hearings,Kate didnt even arrange to pay off my dads care home bill, i gave her the bills addressed to me, even had balifs knocking at my door, more court costs where added to his original care bill, the judge and Kate ignored al my letters written in discusing dads bills to be payed off on his house and his last care home, but they ignored every thing i asked them for, we didnt even sign a contract for dad to go in to that care home, some thing curupt has gone on because even today 5 years later, 3 years after dad died that care home bil has not been payed out my fathers estate, i wonder why, ---- some one is guilty here, is it the council for locking dad in their home?-- conflict of interest, im sure we got them on this one, as well as sentence me to jail for their petty lies saying i had gone public, and im sure the council where not alowed to freeze my dads money to force him in to care, --- this is also conflict of interest, how many more people are going through al these set ups, by law my father was entitled to a family life, by our inteligent loveing family which he had asked for, --- its even in his video we took at the care home as proof------ on you tube also, --- watch it, --- wanda maddocks father John locked in care home. Also wanda maddocks Daily mail, --- but they never published the truth.

APRIL 4 2016 Visiter No.629140 to www.opg.me
Your name is your property when you were born and registered where was the meeting of the minds and full disclosure? The government have stolen your property (the name) and committed a trespass “I am not a vessel im a man” the government of Canada recognises the supremacy of GOD” Given name; statement of birth Common Law is the custom of the people where does the police get jurisdiction over a man? The long form birth certificate is the statement of birth.
Only the jury of peers can judge a man crown court is admiralty law of the SEA (statutes) The CROWN is the BAR (British Accredited Regency) REGINA “THE OATH WAS TO PROTECT FELLOW MEN” POLICE ARE COMMITTING FRAUD
Whose court am I in? whos law is this before this court I do not understand legalise im an idiot websters 1828 Idiot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
Jump to Etymology - Etymology. Idiot is a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs ("person lacking professional skill", "a private citizen", "individual"), ... Origin of idiot
Middle English, from Anglo-French ydiote, from Latin idiota ignorant person, from Greek idiōtēs one in a private station, layman, ignorant person, from idios one's own, private; akin to Latin suus one's own
You cant sue a judge, police constable, firefighter because they are all fictions BUT you can sue the man operating as the fiction. I am not a member of west Yorkshire police im not a member of their system/corporation ; so how does the corporation get jurisdiction over a man? It does not have jurisdiction!!! There is no contract between I a man and west Yorkshire police which is a fiction a corporation, it’s the same as HMRC we have to see that a CITIZEN is NOT man in law we need to see who we are!!
Charter of Rights and freedom and Customs s 32.1 states “the charter only applies to Government”

APRIL 3 2016 Visiter No.629120 to www.opg.me

APRIL 2 2016 Visiter No.629100 to www.opg.me

APRIL 2 2016 Visiter No.629070 to www.opg.me
link to follow..here

APRIL 1 2016 Visiter No.629025 to www.opg.me

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.629000 to www.opg.me

Statute law is only contract law and accepting the title Mr/Mrs makes you a trustee, the lowest standing in the court. frown emoticon You have zero rights as the trustee of the Crown Corporation.
You are actually contracting with them in the courtroom by being nice and letting them make you the public servant, when they are the ones who have the oath sworn as a man/woman under common law.
They are guilty of maladministration of their oath!
That's fraud, and because it's backed up by other actors being paid in the same non-court room, it's conspiracy to commit fraud! Flaws in jurisdiction are cured by the appearance of the body
All Rise! They are raising the dead!
i say don't honor the the invitation/summons. Send it back with 'addressee deceased' written on the font, and then nuke them with a NOTICE OF VOID ORDER, just to be sure! False and misleading conduct , impersonating a commonwealth officer , and obviously treason .. The court officers are actually there to protect you from the court , they need to be reminded of their duty
A title indicates an officer. They claim it's a courtesy title ie a benefit. Maxim on forcing a benefit: No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent. http://ecclesia.org/truth/maxims.html#Benefits /maxims.html#Benefits Maxims of Law When Jesus spoke the Truth to his accusers, he would justify himself by quoting Law. First, he would quote God's Law, and after quoting God's Law He would often quote the accuser's law and use that against them as well. For example, Jesus would say, scriptures and then quote God's Law. Then he would… ecclesia.org
They are also guilty of the unlawful administration of an oath statutory declarations 1835 sec13 and that’s their rules
There is enough evidence lying around (just on my time line) to show that any court without a jury is an inferior court. That Magistrates Court's and County Court's are not constitutionally appointed. They are Star Chamber's abolished in the 15 hundreds. A judges/magistrates oath is common law, then they cause harm to men and women! It's called maladministration of their oath, ie TREASON AND FRAUD frown emoticon That any order from a judge or magistrate is incurably void on its face ab initio. Someone gives me an order i ask where to send the bill. Get your wallet out judge. i don't work for free, maybe we should have a chat about slavery. If he is not under oath there is no court, wink emoticon if he is under oath it's maladministration of his oath. All oaths are common law and these jokers claim they cannot see common law. Wrong jurisdiction totally.
MAXIM: No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent.
The bottom line is, FICTIONS were created by lawyers, so the elite can hid from their liability, while still pushing liability onto other people. I will carry on writing 'Title/Office Not Recognised Return To Sender' on all frudulent letters begging for fiat slave money in a bankrupt society where debt can only be set off into the future.
I will also write MAIL FRAUD on any threat letter with no signature on it, as lack of reverse liability shows criminal intent! No fiat currency system in the world has ever lasted longer than a generation, without it's value returning to zero.
Wars are fought every generation to cull the excess slave stocks, to hide the job of putting all the Monopoly pieces back into the box to start a new game of people farming
I handed in ecclesiastical deed poll and evidence of life 206 form and bought the body back to life Veronica Chapman, from the info page at FMOTL.
What I would do if I was ever Summons to a so-called Magistrates or County Court (aka "Star Chamber")
Update: Late September, 2012
I walk in to a Magistrate's or County so-called 'Court'.
I would stand, and note there is no space for a Jury.
I would say, to whoever is sitting there: "Do you intend to proceed?".
They MUST say: "Yes" ... (and probably "Please sit down as quickly as you can").
I would remain standing, and say: "I do not consent to these proceedings ... do you still intend to proceed?".
They will say something like: "Yes".
So then I would say: “Are you saying that you can proceed without my consent?”.
(Having gone that far) They must say something that means: "Yes".
When they've responded to the fact that 'They don't need my consent', I would say: "LEGALLY that's true of course, but LAWFULLY it is untrue ... very much untrue. Do you know the difference between LEGAL and LAWFUL?"
Now that has to invoke a response! Who knows what the response would be? Probably something along the lines of: "They are the same thing".
To which I would reply: "That's not true at all ... they are - in point of fact - direct opposites. If you don't know what LAWFUL means, then you shouldn't be sitting there".
So I would say: "For that reason you are under arrest for stating that you intend to proceed - in an Administrative capacity - without the consent of both Parties ... could someone please call the Police ... so that this person (these people) can be charged with Misconduct in Public Office and Treason by attempting to subvert the British Constitution".
I would wait ... and tell the Police I will accompany them to the Station, to swear out the COMMON LAW charges of "Misconduct in Public Office" and “Treason”. While I waited, I would explain what I was doing ... and what "Misconduct in Public Office" means. I would also explain, to all the other so-called Court staff (Star Chamber staff), that they can be charged as accessories/accomplices. I'd give all the other functionaries the opportunity to leave before the Police arrive, telling them that I will make them accomplices if they are still there when the Police arrive.
As, and when, the Police arrived, I would explain to them that their job is NOT to decide on whether or not the charges are valid, and/or whether of not the Judge/Magistrates are guilty/not guilty of anything. Their job is simply to process my complaint, and let the Judicial System provide a REAL Court (i.e. one with a Jury) to hear my charges. And for a Jury to reach the Verdict.
If necessary (if I got no co-operation) I would do it via a Private Prosecution ... also charging those who would not assist me. Other Possibilities.
PRIOR TO the "Do you intend to proceed?" question, it is possible to ask: "Is this a Constitutionally-convened Court of Law?" Now, what are they going to say to that? There are about 4 possibilities:
1. "Yes" (in which case they are FUCKED - see below!)
2. "No" (in which case they are FUCKED - because that's an immediate admission of criminal intent … if we continue with the original questions).
3. 'Silence' … in which case they are FUCKED … because we'll just repeat the question.
4. Or something like: "That's none of your business", or: "That doesn't matter", or: "We are not here to answer YOUR questions" … or some other utter bollox … in which case they are FUCKED … if we continue with the original questions.
The interesting one is: "Yes".
This can be followed up with: "Which Constitutional Convention defined these proceedings as Constitutional?"
Now they are FUCKED. They would have to quote "The Magistrate's Court Act" … or some such crap.
Because then next question is: "Was the Magistrates Court Act the outcome of a Constitutional Convention?"
Ho, Ho Ho! The reply would be: "The Magistrates Court Act was determined by Parliament"
So it's: "How does that render it Constitutional? Were the Members who voted favour all Constitutional Experts then? I find that hard to imagine. After all, some of them have difficulty in writing their own names, don't they? Parliament most decidedly DOES NOT comprise Constitutional Experts, which is the reason for the possibility of Jury Nullification. It isn't possible to change a Constitution without having a Constitutional Conference, jam-packed with Constitutional Experts - who VERY CAREFULLY weigh up the Pros & Cons of and amendment that is being considered. Have another go: Is this a Constitutionally-convened Court of LAW?"
Back to square one.
When they get arsey … as they will … it's back to: "Do you intend to proceed?", etc … as necessary. Here's what they are doing:
1. They send an 'invitation' - called 'a Summons' - to a dwelling. Only a man or woman is capable of interpreting the document (a cat can't ... a dog can't ... a chair can't ... and so on)
2. The man or woman makes the effort to go to the place defined (the Star Chamber), at the time/date defined.
3. Upon arrival, the Bench 'can't see', and 'can't hear', the man or woman ... the Bench can only 'see' and 'hear' a Legal Fiction ... such as when the man or woman consents to accept responsibility for the Legal Fiction (i.e. the "Name"). [They have admitted - multiple times - that they "Can only act against a Name". They cannot, for example, act against "Persons unknown"].
4. But 'a Name' is not the man or woman. By many means a Name can be detached from a man or woman, and a different Name attached e.g. Deed Poll, or simply 'by social agreement, during social intercourse ... whereby nicknames are attached, etc'.
It would be a very good idea if this were to be pointed out to them at every occasion, including the ABSURDITY of their position in this respect. I have the experience of standing next to a man, in a Star Chamber, and heard the Judge say he was going to issue a Warrant for the Arrest of the man I was standing next to. JUST HOW ABSURD WAS THAT???
When, after any exchange between the Bench and the man or woman, and said man or woman refuses to "make a plea", they will say that they will unilaterally enter a plea of "not guilty". At this point DEMAND that they prove "Power of Attorney" to do such a thing, pointing out that if they cannot PROVE Power of Attorney, then THEY are taking FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY for that plea. (At the time of writing, this causes multiple 'adjournments'. They simply don't know what to do. Quite how they will find a way around this I do not know - at the time of writing).
The legal person is a corporate entity! Worse than that it is a sub corporation of the crown, so you have no say at all We live in a Virtual Reality, it's not real.
If they want to make us play by Roman rules, that's my favorite.

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.628980 to www.opg.me

MARCH 31 2016 Visiter No.628966 to www.opg.me

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628940 to www.opg.me

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628938 to www.opg.me

Diana Smith This reads like an admission to what we already know. And that is the press in most part do the bidding of the Courts. There is a small office opposite the Supreme Courts in London , where the court journalists hang out. It is a known fact that while a case is in motion these journalists dare not even take a toilet break, less they miss any restrictions the Judge lays down. Perhaps your response to the letter should be you expect a defence for why the Mail feel they can use DIC TAT dictatorism to control the very members of the public that they then expect to purchase their paper? They seem to overlook that you are entitled to an opinion , where as in their own camp , opinions are those of the public. Which judging by the comments for the on -line version of the article, went against the reporter at about 9 to 1 throughout. They got it wrong, were proved to be wrong and still cling to they can do as they like. Well no they can't actually , as was proved with their comment about the "husband" of Stephen Fry.

MARCH 30 2016 Visiter No.628934 to www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2016 Visiter No.628877 to www.opg.me

MARCH 29 2016 Visiter No.628875 to www.opg.me
By order of Pope Francis: All Bar Association licenses are extinguished
Posted on April 8, 2015 by David Robinson
Anna addresses Cardinal George
All Bar Association licenses are extinguished.
•“There will be no seizure of the American retirement accounts, no false flags, no murder, no mayhem, no scalar weapons deployed.
•There will be no deceptive “offers” in commerce seeking to exchange gold for land or human capital under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit.
•There will be an end to this criminality and to the complacency of the Church and of the American Cardinals and Archbishops responsible for the mis-administration of the courts.
Or there will be Hell on earth, Cardinal George — literally, and it will not come against the innocent Americans. The Left Hand of God will come for those who are responsible and unrepentant.
The Treaty of Verona is extinguished. All Bar Association licenses are extinguished. By order of Pope Francis, all attorneys, all clerks, every member of the judicial system operating these frauds and oppressions became 100% individually and commercially liable as of September 1, 2013.
The banking cartels and governmental services corporations have been given three years to clean up their acts from top to bottom, to come into compliance with the Original Equity contract owed to the Americans, and to stop operating in criminal default.
I suggest that you get over your idea that it is the voter’s responsibility.
May God bless you to the same extent that you bless others.
Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia: Riezinger-von Reitzenstein von Lettow”

MARCH 28 2016 Visiter No.628840 to www.opg.me

MARCH 28 2016 Visiter No.628825 to www.opg.me
JUDGES BOND REQUIRED sent recorded delivery


MARCH 27 2016 Visiter No.628815 to www.opg.me

Is a disregard for something that should be considered. "this action displays an arrogant contempt for the wishes of the majority"
A commercial lien affidavit of truth notarised is the truth in law. So how can a court say I am in contempt when it is asking me to take down or remove the truth of a commercial lien affidavit that I then would be in contempt of that truth. This surely is a conflict of interest that only a jury can resolve.
Anna von Reitz
What is in a NAME?
Let's begin with the Bible, the source of the Law of the Land throughout the Western World, and let's begin with the most important name of all, the name of God.
God doesn't have a name. People have made up various excuses for this fact, but the scripture also quite clearly tells us the same. "I Am That I Am" is a four-letter description. There are 72 other three-letter descriptions known as "names of God" that each describe another defining characteristic of God, so that taken on the whole, we know far more about the nature and character of God than we could ever know from a name----but the fact remains that God does not have "a" name.
Neither do God's children. This is on purpose. In Revelation we are told that we will be given names, but as such, we have no names now --- at least no names known to mortal man.
What??? We have no names? That's right, we have no names. As children of God we are spirits inhabiting flesh, and like our Father, we have no names, only descriptions.
This is why for many hundreds of years in all the venues of Law of the Land, people are described: "Anne of Green Gables", "Henry of Warwick", "Elizabeth of Ardennes", "George by the Battlements", "Eleanora of Bailford, Bickford, and Main" ---- or, "Anna Maria Wilhelmina Hanna Sophia Riezinger of (von) Reitzenstein of (von) Lettow before (Vor) Beck."
So if we have no names, what are these things we use day to day to call each other to breakfast?
They are the Mark of the Beast. Why are they the Mark of the Beast? Because only Beasts (animals) have names. Adam was not given the right nor the assignment to name people. He was tasked to name animals and things only. So when a man gives another man a name, he is implying that the man receiving the name is (a) an animal or (b) a thing--- like a corporation.
Well, clearly, in some sense, a man is an animal, a mammal, and recognizable as such and as an animal he can be named. If he acts as a corporation--- a thing ---- he can also be named.
So it is that under the Law of the Sea, men have been given names as animals and treated as such; until very recent times the Admiralty sections of the Public Law (notably Title 7) have freely admitted that men are considered "land assets" and "animals".
Hence, a name applied to a man is literally "the mark of the Beast".
For many centuries the convention of describing people instead of naming them kept confusion at a minimum, but toward the middle of the nineteenth century the age-old practice based on Biblical Law began to be undermined. Why?
Administrative convenience.
It was easier to standardize conventions and religious concerns were waived. The name John Brown is after all just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John of the House Brown" and John Henry Brown is just an abbreviation of the lawful name "John who has taken the name Henry of the House Brown". Why have to write all that out and explain what it means? Doesn't everyone know that already?
Apparently not.
Instead, the lawful description of living people became confused with the Trade Names they were accostumed to using in business transactions. "John Henry Brown" the foreshortened and standardized description of the living man was, at least visually, the same as John Henry Brown, the Trade Name of that same man.
So the "descriptive name" and the "Trade Name" became distinguishable only by context or explicit definition, such as, "for the purposes of this document "John Henry Brown" means the living man making his home at Old Brown House in Devonshire...."
In 1933 FDR took advantage of this confusion between the foreshortened descriptive name and the Trade Name and muddied the water still more----on purpose.
His administration created millions of foreign situs trusts which just happened to be named after living Americans and which just happened to use all the same letters and Upper and Lower case style conventions as their abbreviated descriptive names and Trade Names already used.
Thus the description of a living man was written as "John Henry Brown" and his Trade Name (unincorporated doing business name) was written "John Henry Brown" and now, without his knowledge or consent, the United States of America, Incorporated---- a for-profit governmental services corporation that was about to go bankrupt-- created a franchise for itself and named it "John Henry Brown", too.
Of course, with a little mail fraud thrown in, when the living man "John Henry Brown" received a "statement" in the mail that was apparently addressed to him and which had all the outward appearances of a bill, he assumed it was his bill to pay. What other conclusion would be reasonable?
And in this way we, our parents, and our grandparents have been tricked into "assuming" and paying for debts owed by others--- first by the United States of America, Incorporated, throughout its long bankruptcy reorganization from 1933 to 1999 when all its debts were finally discharged, and now, again, we are being dunned for payment of debts owed by other corporate entities merely named after us---- "JOHN HENRY BROWN" is a Cestui Que Vie Trust formed under the Municipal (independent foreign city state) Law of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation operated out of Puerto Rico under Puerto Rican Commonwealth Law.
The Treasurer of the United States, Rosa Gumataotao Rios, is holding all your property including your name in a public trust named after you and the leeches benefiting from this are pretending that it is all "abandoned property" belonging to "no one" and that the UNITED STATES, INC. and its "STATE OF_______" franchises are the beneficiaries of your name and your property both public and private.
Doesn't that just warm the cockles of your heart?
You have been entrapped and defrauded and press-ganged into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea, all your assets including your name have been "seized upon" while you have been declared "legally dead" and had your ESTATE administered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico......
In March of 2015 the UNITED STATES, INC. was declared insolvent by its creditors, with the result that its secondary creditors (we are obviously in line to be priority creditors of the whole shebang if we wake up) are now here claiming to own everything in sight.
Thus the land grabs in Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and elsewhere.
Thus the credit default swaps disguised as loans and "mortgages".
Thus the false arrests and claims against JOHN HENRY BROWN, which is by DEFINITION is a foreigner, a debtor, and an "Enemy" of the State.
Now you know well in advance why the charges against AMMON BUNDY and CLIVEN BUNDY and other American heroes will stick and why they will be found guilty and why nothing that they or their attorneys say about the Law or the Facts will matter: they are already guilty BY DEFINITION. All that is left to argue is--- does the COURT really have jurisdiction? And how much will they be charged in terms of money and years of life lost?
And you also know why the perverts responsible for these crimes of fraud and personage will be desperate to throw the book at them and make an example of them for standing up for their property and their rights. Their only hope of getting all of us to pay off their debts for them is by legal chicanery and preventing us from making our valid claims known.
If Ammon and Cliven Bundy realize what has been done to them and go to the district Court of the United States and sue to change their name back from AMMON BUNDY and CLIVEN BUNDY to Ammon Bundy and Cliven Bundy respectively and reclaim also their actual nationality as natives of Nevada, the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT will have to let go of their prey like an exploding hot potato and all those responsible for this gargantuan fraud will have to search for rocks to crawl under to hide their public shame.
And that, Dear Reader, is what is in a NAME.
If you read House Joint Resolution 192 very closely you will see that while it offers apparent remedy for all this identity theft and credit fraud, it also imposes a gag order on those responsible for administering it. It's all supposed to be hush-hush, private, confidential. Only those "in the know" who are "competent" to bring claims---- and who know the secret handshake and the secret steps to take--- can reclaim their rightful estate and property stolen from them and their parents and grandparents by mostly foreign banks using "governmental services corporations" as storefronts to operate under color of law and perpetuate all these oppressions and acts of fraud.
At the end of the day, what it amounts to is that these banks have pretended to be the lawful government, and via that illusion, have enjoyed our trust and obedience while they have stolen us blind.
And now they want to talk about "depopulation" --- a euphemism for kiling your creditors to avoid paying them and to profit from the estates they leave behind and to bilk the life insurance policies these vermin have placed on each one of us.
Law enforcement? Sheriffs? Pentagon? Members of Congress?Are you listening?
This is what is in a NAME.
Well, we Americans are awake. By the millions now. And so are the people in Brazil and Kuwait and Great Britain and Canada and Australia and Japan and Russia and China and India and all over this planet. We know and we are asking---- "Oh, so this is the "service" we've been paying you for all these years? To mischaracterize and enslave and defraud us?"
And we are thinking---- if you are worth your salt, you've got one job now. Clean up this mess and clean out these banks and arrest these bankers and clear out their nests on Wall Street and Fleet Street and Paris and Rome and Tokyo. Nobody who has heard this news is in the mood for learning any secret handshakes. We don't believe that 390 million Americans are duty bound to go to court and change their names back, when their names should never have been infringed upon in the first place.
We don't think we should have to pay for anything but the nineteen clearly enumerated services we agreed to pay for. And we think we have something to say about the quality of those services.
We want our good names restored to us and to our unique control, no questions asked. We want our property--both public and private--- restored to us, free and clear of all taxes, tithes, fees, encumbrances, liens, and indebtedness. We want all the credit and actual assets that have been extracted from us via "federal" racketeering, identity theft, and credit fraud returned to us, plus interest.
We want the banks responsible placed under new management and then liquidated to pay their priority and secondary creditors. In those cases where it can be proven that bankers and lawyers knew full-well what was going on, we want the corporate veil pierced and all their ill-gotten gains seized and sold for the benefit of the victims of foreclosure fraud and other atrocities.
The bankers and lawyers and the politicians who issued the gag orders and who have kept the people from obtaining remedy are guilty of the most heinous and venal felonies imaginable, including the theft and exploitation of children, the destruction of families, and the enslavement of entire nations.
That is what is in a NAME.
And now, let's return to where we began, and reflect with Solomon that there is nothing new under the sun. We have been here before. Read Jeremiah 34: 8-22. King Zedekiah and his ministers and the rich men of Jerusalem decided to do the right thing (mostly because they were under seige by the Babylonians) and agreed to follow God's rule and release the Hebrew slaves, both men and women. But then, they changed their minds and re-enslaved them, which sealed their own fate and destruction.
Here are the names of the banks that make up the so-called "Federal Reserve"---
Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
These are Jewish banks and Jewish bankers, no getting around it. And they are principally responsible for this entire situation, though they have been helped (mightily) by the British Crown, the British Monarch, the various Bar Associations and their Members, and politicians both the corrupt and the clueless alike, to create this gigantic fraud and perpetuate this criminality.
Jacob Rothschild stands in the shoes of King Zedekiah. God requires the slaves to be set free. And if they aren't. you all know the rest of the story. Anu:hotep/anaroth

MARCH 26 2016 Visiter No.628790 to www.opg.me
IN WAITING... to be SUED by REAL PEOPLE.. me n mum

MARCH 26 2016 Visiter No.628762 to www.opg.me
Wanda Maddocks NOT FORGOTTEN
My father was murderd by my local council, they drugged him up in every care home to make him look a lot worse than he was, i only realised after my brothers had kidnapped him for me, and i managed to get him to Fethiye in Turkey to give my father a normal more healthier life that he didnt seem drugged up any more, his brain and health improved by almost 100%, he was so happy and singing in his bedroom, in our apartment in Turkey, i took him line danceing, and to a lovely christian church where he realy surprised me and became a christian, they gave him a wooden cross which he would not leave my appartment with out putting it in his pocket, my dad had always been a athiest. He eat a lot more food, the warm sunshine and sea air made him want to do a lot of walking, he met a new women friend. SOON AS WE LANDED BACK İN ENGLAND, 2 MONTHS LATER, we learned in horror the council had frozen all dads bank money so he had no money for his food, they had started a court of protection court case, a secret court hearing where our family where not allowed to go public or all our money would be taken from us, and we could go to jail, --------this was total curuption, against the human rights law, my dad was entitled to a family life, ---- the council totaly set me up on my visits to my dad, they told so many lies about me, so they could make me look stupid and incapable of looking after my own father, they grabbed my dad back and locked him up in their care homes again, i suddenly was sent a court letter saying they where sending me to jail for electronicaly sending a leaflet to a local collage which i never did, so i ended up in jail not guilty, for 7 weeks not 6 weeks like the DAİLY MAİL printed, and it was not for kidnapping my father, i was sentenced for this big lie they told, and i never said that about the cross i dropped off to my dad at his care home, ---- read more, ----- google,------ wanda maddocks Daily mail, so many discriminating lies told by my local council. No one can trust councils, they should be governed in a more honest way, our goverment is allowing people to be murderd, and babys are been taken off the mothers in the same way, im a intelligent careing women, ----- this should never had happend, dad was entitled to a family life by law, court of European rights , -------- rights broken, i never got justice, i dont wish to live in England any more, its put me off the system, its way to curupt, solicitors are bent, judges bent, who can we trust.
video here
On the 30th March 2016 Wanda wrote..

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter 628750 to www.opg.me

Today is the 1st outing for mum from the 7 week stay in hospital.. she said "I hope your getting me out of here soon.." I laughed and said ok we will take you out today for a few hours then Monday next we ve been invited to a friends villa Heinrich Weber for lunch.

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter No.628745 to www.opg.me

MARCH 25 2016 Visiter No.628723 to www.opg.me

Commercial organisations carrying on business in the United Kingdom need to be aware of a new piece of compliance legislation – the Modern Slavery Act 2015. The date 31 March 2016 is key in this new legislation as organisations are now required to produce a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ at the end of every financial year falling after that day.
What is required?
The objective of the Act is to ensure transparency and accountability around the business activities of large organisations, not just to investors but also to other groups including employees, consumers and the public at large. It aims to create a level playing field between those organisations adopting ethical business practices and those that are not, driving investment towards more sustainable, responsible organisations.
Section 54 of the Act requires a commercial organisation in any sector, which supplies goods or services and carries on a business or part of a business in the UK, with a global turnover of £36 million or more to prepare a ‘slavery and human trafficking statement’ each financial year. This statement must set out the steps taken by the organisation in that year to ensure that slavery or human trafficking has not taken place in its supply chains or in any part of its own business.
This does not mean that the organisation must guarantee that the entire supply chain is slavery free. Instead, it means an organisation must set out the steps it has taken to ensure slavery and human trafficking is not taking place in relation to any part of the supply chain. However, if an organisation has taken no steps it must still publish a statement stating that to be the case.
The statement must be signed by a director and approved by the Board before being published on the organisation’s website, with a prominent link to it included on the homepage. Organisations without a website must provide copies of the statement to anyone requesting one.
When is this needed?
The requirement to provide this statement applies to organisations with a financial year ending on or after 31 March 2016. Those organisations will have to provide a statement at the end of that financial year and at the end of every financial year thereafter. So, for an organisation with a financial year end of 31 March 2016, the statement must set out the steps taken between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016. For an organisation with a financial year end of 31 May, the statement must set out the steps taken between 1 June 2015 and 31 May 2016, and so on. The statement is backwards looking. There is no requirement to project forward to set out steps that will be taken in future financial years to ensure the absence of slavery in the supply chain (although this information could be included voluntarily if appropriate).
Organisations with a financial year ending between 29 October 2015 (when the Act came into force) and 30 March 2016 will not need to produce a statement for that financial year but will need to produce a statement for each subsequent financial year. It is recommended that organisations produce their statement as soon as possible and in any event within six months of the end of the financial year to which it relates in order to ensure that the information in it remains current.
What if we don’t do it?
The Secretary of State is empowered to seek an injunction against a non-compliant organisation ordering it to produce a statement. Failure to comply with an injunction is contempt of court for which the sanction is an unlimited fine. In addition, as the public becomes increasing aware of the existence of these statements, failure to produce a statement in any year is likely to adversely impact on an organisation’s reputation, with possible adverse inferences being drawn.
How do we know what to do?
The Home Office has produced guidance for organisations on their obligations under s54 of the Act. The guidance defines some key terms (such as what modern slavery is), explains how to calculate global turnover (so an organisation can assess if it falls within the scope of the Act) and gives tips (with examples) on drafting an acceptable statement.
What should we do now?
As the end of its financial year approaches, an organisation must prepare to produce the statement required by the Act. Organisations that have taken relevant steps to ensure that slavery or human trafficking has not taken place in its supply chains or in any part of its own business need to collate the information about exactly what has been done, in preparation for drafting the statement. This, of itself, could be a significant task the first time round.
Organisations that have not taken such steps may be concerned that they have nothing to report. If they want to rectify that, they have until the end of their financial year to put some appropriate steps in place.

MARCH 23 2016 Visiter No.628675 to www.opg.me

MARCH 23 2016 Visiter No.628665 to www.opg.me

Make your own mind up about the future of Britain based on this website.

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628640 to www.opg.me

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628635 to www.opg.me

MARCH 22 2016 Visiter No.628633 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628605 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628602 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628600 to www.opg.me

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628590 to www.opg.me

A Report to the World-Anna von Reitz
The UN Corporation doing business as the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES doing business as the STATE OF ALASKA, The Federal Reserve doing business as the Federal Reserve System doing business as the United States of America, Incorporated, doing business as the State of Alaska, the FEDERAL RESERVE doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (INC.) doing business as ALASKA..... the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, the WASHINGTON DC MUNICIPALITY, the U.S.A. (Inc.), the U.S. Corp, The United States of America (Inc.), E Pluribus Unum the United States of America (Inc.)......
Do you realize that roughly 80% of what Americans have paid to support the poor and disabled in this country---- public assistance, aid for orphans, the unemployed, the mentally ill, people with chronic diseases, the elderly, paralyzed veterans---- has been siphoned off by these above-named corporate vermin, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies and affiliates?
We paid for all these programs with the intention of taking care of everyone, and instead, these criminals have been like rats in a grain storage silo, putting out just enough to give a storefront appearance that these programs were real and helping people, while secretively embezzling from the poorest and most vulnerable Americans.
Just as bad, 98% of what Americans have paid to support the poor in other countries around the world-----vast amounts of foreign aid----have been siphoned off and squandered by these criminals. We have given and given and given with the intention of helping people in the Third World and paid for programs to build bridges and drill water wells and provide homes and livestock and electrical generators and transportation and roads and fishing boats and clothing and medicine and entire hospitals and schools and supplies of every kind, plus food of all kinds------and where has it gone? Mostly stolen by the thieves in Washington, DC, but then also stolen by their counterparts in other countries. They have fed upon the innocent and helpless both going and coming---- stealing the benefit of our giving from the people we intended it for, and thereby stealing from us as well. They have had a "two for one" theft scheme going, in which the Americans are thought to be hard-hearted and greedy and selfish, and the people in the Third World are thought to be ungrateful, lazy, and incompetent, with neither party realizing that criminally dishonest middlemen have been the problem all along.
Embezzlers. Thieves. Con artists. Imposters. And these duplicitous vermin have been the "face of America" to the rest of the world. They have sent their commercial mercenary armies into other countries around the world and raped and pillaged and stolen and polluted and pedaled their wares of guns and armaments and drugs and alcohol and every kind of immorality and they have done this in the names of America and Americans while we have been kept isolated and "dumbed down on the farm back home"----- believing in "our government" and Mom and apple pie.
It is indeed disgusting to contemplate what these criminals have gotten away with and what the rest of the world must think of us as a result.
The best that can be said for it is that we know now. We are waking up. For many people this process is very hard and unpleasant, like being awakened from a sound sleep with a bucket of cold water. For a while--- weeks or months depending upon how deeply indoctrinated people are, how loathe they are to admit the truth---- they rampage around striking out at friend and foe alike, disoriented and unable to know the difference, still half-asleep and grumpy like hibernating bears in the spring time.
And then something happens. Some little thing goes "click" in their brains and they realize The Truth. All at once. It is not uncommon for grown men to break down and weep when this happens. Boom. The American Dream has been unlawfully converted by these scum bags into the American Lie.
Once they wake up, people know for sure that they are unhappy and have been unhappy for a long time. They know that they are not free and that they live in fear of unaccountable "agencies" like the FBI and IRS and FEMA and DHS ----foreign commercial mercenaries and bill collectors operating under old trade names and brand names, pretending to be part of a lawful government that is long gone. The newly awakened gradually own up to the fact that they are constantly being harassed and exploited and manipulated and disrespected and extorted and intimidated and misrepresented by people who are supposed to be providing them with "essential governmental services". They realize they are being robbed---and worse, blamed for all this evil by the rest of the world.
When I first realized all this it felt like I had a big block of ice in my stomach. There was no fire, no outburst, no tears, no fear, no great emotion---- just icy cold stillness and hardness. I felt my jaw solidify into a rock. I realized in that moment that it truly didn't matter if I lived or died, how much it cost, how long it took----and this is what I mean when I twist the words of King George V and tell people--- "Keep calm and get even." Don't flinch. Don't let your emotions run wild. Feel no fear. Don't worry. The Devil has been living in your house for a long time. The only difference is that now you know he is there.
We are dealing with the British Raj here. The same vermin that Gandhi had to face in India. The same ones who mowed down the wives and daughters at Amritsar. The same ones who kept people from taking salt from the sea, which they needed to live and which had always been their right to harvest generation unto generation. The same ones who enslaved the Indian people by the hundred millions to feed Westminster, the British Crown Corporation, and the Queen --- have been sitting here polishing their boots in America --- feeding off of us and using our sons and daughters as fodder in their wars for profit, stealing and manipulating our natural resources. pawning off their phony paper promises "in equitable exchange" for our silver and gold, bullying us, and misrepresenting us to the rest of the world so that at the end of the day after all this abuse at their hands, we would be blamed by the rest of the world for all the evil these criminals have committed in our names.
And when I say, "in our names"----I mean it literally. Several years ago I obtained a copy of "my" Master File kept by the IRS and learned that---- supposedly--- I was running a rum distillery in Barbados. That is a pretty good trick for a grandma who has never visited the Caribbean. I was pretty high up in the management, too----hauling down the equivalent of $180,000.00 a year in salary that I somehow never received. Imagine all the other Americans who are going about their lives on dairy farms and working in small businesses and clerking at grocery stores who are being grossly, purposefully, with malice-aforethought lied about like this?
Just recently I was given more "official government records"---- this time records related to my dead father's estate. He has been dead since 1981, but somehow, "he" is still paying no less than nine (9) mortgages out of estate trust accounts established "in his name" -----and all for people I never heard of and who are not part of our family.
How is this possible? When we are mere babies in our cradles undeclared agents of these foreign corporations ---- the IMF and the British Crown Corporation --- come to new Mothers in the guise of hospital workers and force them to sign paperwork seeming to admit that they are all unwed mothers, all "donating" their babies to the "State" corporation as "wards of the State". I was told that if I didn't sign this paperwork, my son would not be released to my care. He would be placed in "State sponsored Foster Care" and I would never see him again.
I was a completely responsible 40 year old adult with a good income, a husband, a home, everything---- and they pretended that I was an irresponsible, indigent, unwed mother seeking to offload my unwanted baby and willingly giving him to the tender mercies of the "STATE OF ALASKA"---- the local franchise of the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES (INC.).
They did what they always do. They seized upon his name, copyrighted it as property of the British Commercial Corporation, and began spinning off all sorts of corporate "personas" named after my son.
First, there was a "state level" foreign situs trust doing business as Eric Jon Belcher. And then there was a Roman Inferior (Cestui Que Vie) Trust operated out of Puerto Rico doing business as ERIC JON BELCHER. And then, most recently, Mr. Obama decided to create a public transmitting utility called Eric J. Belcher--- also in Puerto Rico----all owned and operated by the British Crown Corporation and its various subsidiaries, franchises, and affiliates and created for their benefit.
They have issued performance bonds in my son's name under the pretense that he is or ever was their ward and have obligated him to pay off their mortgages, accept their debts, pay their taxes, buy their services, accept conscription into their commercial mercenary forces, obey every whim of their "Congress", back their promissory notes with his private property and labor, and so on and on in an endless recitation of enslavement and false claims and breach of trust.
I want the world to know that all and any paperwork I signed at Providence Medical Center in November of 1996 I signed under the most detestable and inexcusable duress imaginable, under threat of forcible kidnapping of my infant son. Any contract express or implied arising from such practices and seeming to obligate me or my son is nothing but fraud on the face of it and always has been. The British Crown Corporation, the UN Corporation, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, their parent corporations, subsidiaries, agencies, and affiliates are guilty of malicious tort fraud of the worst kind.
These corporations are under demand to release our copyrighted names, trademarks, and private estates to our control free and clear, without tax, lien, debt, attachment, encumbrance, obligation, deed, claim, or colorable title of any kind. And then we will talk about what else they owe us.
Every corporation involved in this enslavement and kidnapping racket, all those preying upon babies and new mothers, deserve to be liquidated and have their assets distributed to their Priority Creditors-----the American People. Those responsible for promoting and continuing to implement this institutionalized fraud and enslavement scheme need to be arrested as criminals and prosecuted to the fullest extent of both national and international law. People everywhere need to be aware of what has gone on here, who is responsible, and what we are all facing. It's not "the Americans"----its a nest of vicious and cowardly criminals who have insinuated themselves and pretended to represent us, while bilking us and everyone else for their own profit.

MARCH 21 2016 Visiter No.628575 to www.opg.me
full story here

MARCH 20 2016 Visiter No.628568 to www.opg.me

Aj Hollis Statute laws are legal fictions, assumed consent is a fraud. MPs for the most, live with eye wide shut simply to hitch a ride on the gravy chain.
Attaching peoples real live to that of parasitic whore lawyers is a fraud in it's self. The Court of Protection Racket, is the actualization of taxation of life it's self. It is piracy of the sea enacted on land by the filth that infests the city of London and a mafia that is the legal profession. The judiciary come from the legal profession so are therefore blighted by partiality, they serve a self serving, self perpetuating system that by it's nature is a tresspass against the person, and a crime against humanity.
This system is designed to incrementally use legal fiction to empower the money lenders and while weakening the defence of sovereign beings against the corporatism (the cult of death). When the sovereign being reacts, they are isolated by the false judges and they and their true rights are fruadulently denied

MARCH 20 2016 Visiter No.628565 to www.opg.me
There have been a number of developments in this case recently. North Yorkshire Police are said to have spent around £1million of public funds obtaining a "gagging order" as a result of a civil claim pursued on behalf of private individuals. This is for alleged harassment and flies in the face of a Crown Prosecution Service determination that there is insufficient evidence of harassment to warrant a prosecution.
Legal opinion we have questions the legality of this claim and the validity of the order, which restricts what can be said about this case. For instance, Grandma B's name must not be mentioned in the public domain. Neither can the names of the people Lord Maginnis has stated in Parliament as her abusers and persecutors be mentioned in the public domain. However, there are no restrictions on naming her loyal son and carer Peter Hofschroer.
Peter has now started his second year of imprisonment on remand and is currently at HMP Holme House. The trial date is now 4th July 2016, but may not go ahead then. It has already been put back several times. This is a clear breach of Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 which requires cases to be heard in a reasonable time.
The sinister and secretive Court of Protection is now determining Grandma B's future. She is being held incommunicado in an undisclosed location. Since being in the "care" of her persecutors at York Social Services, she has received a series of life-threatening injuries. We fear for her life.
Meanwhile, Grandma B's abusers have fraudulently sold her house, seized Peter's, stolen his belongings and sold his house as well. Presumably, the police officers, social workers and judges involved are likely to have got their pay-offs by now.
Grandma B and her loyal son are now homeless, penniless and unlawfully imprisoned.
All Grandma B ever wanted was to spend her remaining years living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son.
Sadly, this will now never be possible.

MARCH 19 2016 Visiter No.628542 to www.opg.me

MARCH 19 2016 Visiter No.628525 to www.opg.me

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628500 to www.opg.me

Michael Clarke’s side of the story as told to John Smith. here in PDF
NO matter whether you are a national daily newspaper or in our case a weekly, six-edition English language paper, the freedom of press comes with obligations which need to be recognised.
Here at the Euro Weekly News, we published an article two weeks ago about an Englishman and his mother, Michael and Ann Clarke, where we gave some details of what we understood to be their story and asked readers to keep an eye open for them.
Within a few days of the publication of the article, we were contacted by Michael himself, who asked that he be given the opportunity to present his side of the case as he believed that he was being placed in an unfavourable light, and in his opinion he had been wronged by both his family and the process of English law.
This is where our responsibility to present the other side of the story comes in, and I met both Michael and his mother Ann (who unfortunately is currently in hospital in Spain), to hear exactly what he had to say and after spending several hours in his company, I do agree that his position should be made clear.
According to Michael, when the accident occurred in 1995, Ann spent a year in hospital and when she came out, she moved to a care home which she didn’t like so it was agreed between the family that she would stay in her own house. It was also agreed that she would pass it to her daughter who would take over the mortgage and in return would make a payment to her mother (which she allegedly failed to make) and look after her, and that Michael would move in as well.
In a relatively short period of time, Michael decided to move out as he had been offered the tenancy of a pub, but within about 10 weeks his sister advised she couldn’t cope with Ann and she would have to go into a home. Neither Ann nor Michael wanted this and although the pub wasn’t really suitable for her needs, she moved in with him and he looked after her on an unpaid basis from 1996 until 2001.
During that time he left the pub and ran a student lodging house and rented a bungalow for himself and his mother. His sister moved in after a marital dispute and agreed that if he moved to Tenerife, she would look after Ann.
After a few weeks, Ann travelled to Tenerife on holiday and asked that she be allowed to stay with Michael to which he agreed and they stayed on the Island for two years. This was all prior to any settlement and without any cash, except for the mother’s disability allowance on which they lived.
1995 was the year when Ann Clarke’s accident occurred
There was a problem with a credit card which I cannot go into detail about, but for a period of time the benefits allowance was suspended whilst an investigation took place and this caused significant financial stress on the pair, although it was eventually resolved and back payments were given to them.
At the same time, in the lawsuit there was a change of solicitor and the new solicitor suggested that the matter be settled out of court to which they reluctantly agreed, and a payment of £775,000 was made to the mother, with Michael acting officially on her behalf.
At the time of the settlement, Ann and Michael employed two clinical specialists to establish whether she was able to make her own decisions to which they declared she was. Despite this however the whole matter was sent to the Court of Protection and a solicitor was appointed to look after her affairs and manage her funds.
In 2001 they moved to Blackpool. According to Michael, and I have not seen documentary evidence of this, (although I don’t doubt that this is his absolute belief), the solicitor was supposed to charge around £2,000 annually to manage this matter, but in the first year released just £10,400 to Ann, whilst charging £26,377 for his services, with a further £14,000 charged the second year.
This carried on for two years before Michael found this out, and after they a made a formal complaint their allowance was increased. Michael set up a club by 2003, which was successful. All was well until the recession in 2008, when the club suffered setbacks and they decided to immigrate to Spain.
At that time, in 2008, they had been trying to sell the property in Blackpool, without success as the recession had set in and Michael has been accused of acting improperly by his sister which he completely denied. Whilst living in Spain, Ann tried to exchange her UK property for a Spanish villa, which Michael has accused the deputy solicitor of prevaricating resulting in the loss of two properties.
In addition, because so much money has been held in sterling rather than a euro account which they had requested, there was a significant exchange rate loss. In short, they allege that the Court of Protection had overcharged Ann an estimated £150,000, and facilitated an exchange rate loss by not providing a euro account of £100,000, meaning Ann was out of pocket by a total of £250,000.
From 2009 to 2013 Michael had written to all known complaint bodies to try and draw attention to this, but all to no avail. The advice received was to serve on the solicitors a Commercial Lien that basically is a statement of truth sworn on oath before a notary.
He insists he would return to the UK to have the whole matter aired in front of a court provided there is a jury which will make the decision with regards to his guilt, and he advised me he has been given an undertaking by the court, (which has no right of extradition from Spain) that if he returns to the UK to apologise, and if his mother returns and surrenders her passport then ‘all will be forgiven’.
That begs the question of why Ann should give up her passport, what happens about the alleged losses, does Michael have a ‘record’ and will he be chased for court fees?
It is up to each and every one of our EWN readers to make their own conclusion on this situation, but as the writer of both stories I do believe that neither the local press nor the general public should play judge and jury in this matter.
What is crucial to remember is the whole point of the initial story was to try to ensure the protection and welfare of Ann Clarke, who I have now seen for myself and do believe without question she is more than happy to be here in Spain with her loving son Michael.
What do you, our readers think? Is this a case of a fugitive on the run or simply a loving, doting son doing the best he can for his mother?

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628492 to www.opg.me
18th March 2016 published on www.opg.me mike@rake.net
A statement
by: Mike: Clarke
To clarify;
1. Your wilful refusal to address the losses inflicted upon Ann’s estate shows how the words ‘guardian’ & ‘protection’ play their roles not upon the vulnerable public, but upon yourselves.
2. Before we ever step one foot into that country ever again the issues of LOSS needs to be addressed with URGENCY for without it the guise of GUARDIAN & PROTECTION are laughable.
3. Once the issue of LOSS has been addressed, there can be no case to answer for harassment and nor was there ever a case for it, against a carer, whistle blower son and heir, who was, in the face of crime only doing what he lawfully must do, to report and account for such crime.
4. If the UNITED KINGDOMs crime reporting and policing policy’s upon white collar frauds do not step up and deliver, as is the case here, then common law must prevail and is available to use.
5. A statement of truth as a notarised affidavit, COMMERCIAL LIEN should not be apologised for in a purge, as it would be in contempt of THE TRUTH. I cannot be in contempt of both the truth & the court for it is the duty of the court to be seen to get at the truth, is it not?
6. Strangely, the court recently and I quote, “upon the courts own initiative” acted whichever way it has wanted, but has not once mentioned or referred to the losses inflicted upon ANN, but what it does demonstrate is, that it CAN! Yet the court states, ‘it’s not in Ann’s best interest to be away from her native country’, carefully ignoring they are the reason that drove her out.
7. The court is attempting to put the cart before the horse, obviously to facilitate its blackmailing process of a purge of contempt by the threat of prison for Mike: Clarke and a care home prison for Ann, by the removal of her passport, in orders to PROTECT the BAR CRIMINALS.
8. The court has already laid Ann’s estate to waste by the devaluing of her home £70,000 by the actions of police raiding her property 3 times at night destroying the lodging business that was topping up her pension in 3 years by £60,000 and if not sold NOW, further waste will follow.
9. The police will not act to investigate white collar fraud theft and mal administration but upon a biased unfair and partial to PANNONE LLP warrant of arrest ordered by a treasonous JUDGE will break down doors to get at the whistle blower of crime, a carer!
10. There by the view point of a barrister in 2015 January where he said there is a case to answer but yet no representation will be forthcoming, what can one do? Exchange Losses £100,000
11. CAPPED charges from day one never took place and should in ten years not have exceeded £25,000 but actually were £155,000 equalling an overcharge of £130,000… the 1st year alone of £26,377 was never fully accounted for in a detailed manner? NO ACCOUNTABILITY - THEFT
12. Just a brief insight to claimed losses amounts to £360,000 without any punitive allowances and other hardship calculations preventing Ann from property exchange or purchase abroad.
13. The facts are not just isolated to us, there are many others that have suffered losses at the hands of an organised crime syndicate of probate practitioner racketeering that is operating under the guise of the Office of the Public Guardian, PROTECTED by its Court of Protection.

MARCH 18 2016 Visiter No.628470 to www.opg.me

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628440 to www.opg.me
Dear Mr Troup
My brother defendant has just forwarded to me your email below. In future please ensure you copy-in the other defendants.
As you may already know I am a researcher into serious and organized crime and the extent into which it has infiltrated the court of protection and national a network of professional panel probate practitioners. We need to print all emails for dissemination amongst the team so we ask you to use black instead of blue in future.
I read you were asking for the Official Solicitor's file. Did you receive it? I am sure you will want to fulfil professional conduct rules and fair trial rights. At present it appears the civil trial set for the 5th 6th & 7th will need to be adjourned until a fair trial is achieved with full and proper disclose.
I am sure you will understand the seriousness of these matters as the legal professionals involved are not of those entitled and given the strength of evidence these matters can be elevated from the civil to the criminal courts accompanied with all the possibility of prison sentences being handed down.
I am waiting for a response from the 2nd defendant if he would except an offer from your clients and as agents their client to settle. The settlement could be collected from all those legal professionals involved in the fraud of our actual real property.
Considering: The Defamation of the Testator and her Executor. The insolence and interference of mere solicitors. The deceit and wilful intimidation element of the claimants behaviour. Compensation for the loss of a large estate. The huge distress caused and an element of Exemplary damages I believe my brother may agree with me to settle in the sum of twelve 12 million pounds.
We look forward to hearing from you with your clients agreement.
Gary Hollis
Executor researcher

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628424 to www.opg.me
Before her death while my mother was under the Court of Protection Racket, her receiver/deputy corrupt lawyer Anthony Spiers, Bath had a fraudulent Statutory Will forged that added two clauses STEP which added as a fourth beneficiary a Multi Millionaire who had through his corrupt Lawyer Jeremy Thring Bath made shares worth 90% less through a share rights issue while she was sick, and HOTCHPOT which added in all gifts given in her lifetime to be accounted for in the forged Will. The Fraud was taken court but all the corrupt court did was remove fraudulent clause and appoint two different corrupt lawyers and Anne Minihane as the corrupt deputy. The reason stated for this Will was another fraud, a "hypothetical Lucid Moment'. since Minihane and corrupt Law firm Burroughs Day, Bristol have robbed us of around 30 to 40% of the true value plus Inheritance Tax at 40%. Now they are suing us to force us to sign there accounts and indemnify them for their crimes. As we are paying for the legal costs, I can't afford a Barrister, so am a litigant in Person although in coercion sounds closer to the fact. In my submission and witness statement I made clear I was making a counter claim, at no stage did I get told I needed permission until I found out after a pre trial I could not attend.. this letter shows clearly shows the conduct of Judge McCahill and Barrister Alex Troup. I would be interested in any comments
Dear Judge McCahill
I have gone over all communications from the Court and there has been absolutely no indication that I was informed I needed to apply to the Court for permission to have my counter claim heard by the court. The only mention of seeking permission was in relation to my brother and his letter to the court, and naturally as he had not acknowledged the claim in the specified time, it reasonably appeared to me that this was why he needed to apply for permission. I read Troups skeleton argument on the 6th of march, My partners mother Joanna ***** had fallen seriously ill after a battle with cancer and was dying. Our lives were upside down trying to arrange her work obligations for my partner to travel to Wells to see her mother before she died, plus of course from this entirely uncalled for claim. Ana’s mother sadly passed away on the morning of the 9th of March just as Ana was boarding her plane at Malaga Airport
I also note that Troup falsely states I made unsubstantiated claims of Fraud, this is prejudicially untrue, I have a copy of the Statutory Will that includes 2 added clauses STEP and HOTCHPOT that prejudice the heirs for the benefit of a 4th person which is clearly fraud, as is a “hypothetical Lucid Moment” as the only excuse for this and the second false Will. This fraud however has nothing to do with my counter claim and nor do a great many of my true and substantiated claims, that are only include as general proof of misconduct.
Indeed my claim stands as well under Negligence as it does under Racketeering and misconduct.
Sir if you have read my evidence it is entirely clear I have a good case against the claimants, and it is entirely apparent Troup is desperate to silence me, indeed the whole indemnity claim is a clear and obvious attempt to pervert the course of Justice.
In all due respect your refusal to hear my counter claim as a litigant in person, demonstrates a clear prejudice, I will withdraw from the case and make an official complaint against both you and Troup. I feel sure any order you make in such circumstances will be made void. This will then require retrial that will add further costs once again adding yet more profit from the on going racketeering, and regrettably those will need to be sort from a claim against you for misconduct.
To avoid such unpleasantness I respectfully request you postpone the hearing and disqualify yourself as Judge as it strongly appears you are not acting under your oath and instead acting for the claimant.
Further I am fully aware that many of the people involved in this false Will are Freemasons. As it is common knowledge that any oath to her Majesty, is secondary to the oaths of this satanic cult, and indeed I believe under threat of death. I therefore seek to ensure that your replacement has no such affiliations.
With respect, kindest regards Adrian Hollis

MARCH 17 2016 Visiter No.628400 to www.opg.me
INVOICE for £15 million filed on JUDGE JACKSON for FRAUD

FAO JUDGE JACKSON the attached BILL/INVOICE for £15 million pounds
When you settle this attached BILL we then will have the money to pay for flights as we are skint right now.

MARCH 16 2016 Visitor No.628380 to www.opg.me

SENTENCE SUSPENDED but is it in mine and mums BEST INTERESTS??? subject to me apologising??? for what?? for trying to get back what they STOLE??
1. The state control of mums estate has prevented her from moving abroad to exchange her property. Meaning the empty property devalued by waste to £180,000 from £250,000 a total loss for mum of £70,000
2. The state control of her cash estate in emgration forcing her to live off pound sterling devaluing the estate by an exchange rate LOSS of £100,000
3. The state conrol under the 1st general order made by Judge Lush in 2001 by his own statement and the deputy Hugh Jones efectively capped charges to £2000 p.a. meaning over 10 years charges would be £20,000 but in fact were £150,000 making a breach of trust by £130,000 LOSS.
4. The proof of capacity by 4 doctors reports at or around £800 each & 2 state doctors that did nothing as fraud by false representation continued amounted to a LOSS of £5000
5. The states lack of safe guards ref accountability and investigation drove mum into exile costing her ability to walk, without her aids from home... LOSSES that would have kept her in the life she needed ie her lodging house with 4 tenants that left due to police activity .. £360 per week x 52 = £18,720 x 3 years = LOSS £56,000
6. The states lack of accountability leading to the carers exile and court costs to PANNONE LLP what ever they may be. MEANING that mums personal losses by the unaccountabilty of a court with unchecked unfettered powers upon the vulnerable is nothing short of on or around a half million pounds without punitive damages, MINIMUM.

MARCH 15 2016 Visiter No.628335 to www.opg.me

MARCH 15 2016 Visiter No.628322 to www.opg.me


MARCH 14 2016 Visiter No.628270 to www.opg.me
AWAITING contact from one television producer and also the BBC about our STORY.
The EURO WEEKLY NEWS are now going to press with the full and complete story for release next week. The media do now seem to be getting their teeth into the facts.

MARCH 13 2016 Visiter No.628224 to www.opg.me


FAO the FOREIGN OFFICE & our MP Gordon Marsden via DOMINIC of the British CONSULATE Malaga Spain
also copied to
Steve Doughty & Paul Macre of the DAILY MAIL
JUDGE JACKSON for whom the attached letter is ultimately directed via MORTON the clerk
cc'd to other victims Pilot Leonard Lawrence - Jean James - Gary Hollis
Published on www.opg.me
Dear BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE via Dominic of the British Consulate in SPAIN
You may or may not be aware of Judge Jacksons latest proposed draft order linked here within the attached letter to him.
In his proposal my mum must return to the UNITED KINGDOM and surrender her PASSPORT!!!
In it JACKSON offers to suspend a fraudulent courts prison sentence of her son for 3 months where Judge Pelling's BIASED sentence was VOID anyway.
He also offers that within 6 weeks I the son purge my so called contempt of JUDGE FOSKITs court order in which that TOO was VOID from due process denial.
WE are not only reeling from the shock of totally BIASED WORLDWIDE adverse press that got it completely wrong that now JUDGE JACKSON appears to be playing up to that press alleging mum's incapacity to be free to travel where and with whom she like s as per documented CLINICAL NEUROLOGICAL SPECIALISTS reports that state her capacity to such, what on earth is going on??
He continues in this draft with the BLACKMAIL proposals of purge my contempt when it is the court of protection that is in contempt of my mothers LOSSES under the UNITED KINGDOMS act of PARENS PATRAE, state control of her affairs that prevented her moving abroad to purchase property previously, forced her when emigrated to live off sterling losing her £100,000 and now persecuting her and me into exile in the 1st instance to prevent them putting the whistle blower son into prison to STOP SILENCE GAGG and PERVERT justice by using a purge of BLACKMAIL???
Jesus you just could not make this UP??
IT looks like our only option remaining is to RENOUNCE our BRITISH PASSPORTS??
by: THE EXECUTOR of ANN CLARKEs estate under the terms of the living will
mike & ann: clarke

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628138 to www.opg.me
BUY a COPY of the 'NEW DAY' the latest NEW nataional paper if you want the real story

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628124 to www.opg.me
NOT YET SENT linked here

MARCH 11 2016 Visiter No.628113 to www.opg.me

If Only Neuberger could remember he is a public servant not a stylish entertainer and concentrate on remedy for the public who are being Robbed of their homes freedoms and universal human rights: Neuberger has completely concealed our Magna Carta 1215 are courts of law and justice, Fruitless no remedy exists If Only Neuberger reverted to are basic laws of the land the two saddest words in the English Dictionary If Only.

MARCH 10 2016 Visiter No.628052 to www.opg.me

MARCH 9 2016 Visiter No.628026 to www.opg.me

Only just opened it but I do believe that surrendering mums passport breaches her human rights, that I am not happy about, she has capacity & she has doctors reports that conclude she holds capacity to decide where to live and with whom.
She has capacity to make a will, why should we be blackmailed into apologising to a corrupt court.
Likewise where does this reflect Ann's best interests, would anyone like having their passport removed from them to become a UK prisoner when her will was made to protect her as I am her EXECUTOR that I am of the understanding is the highest office in the land.
Would mum or I feel safe setting foot back into the UK under these terms??
TIPSTAFF - Wikipedia best describes this as a JUDGES THUG.. would you like your mothers passport being removed by a JUDGES THUG??
More thoughts to follows.

MARCH 8 2016 Visiter No.628000 to www.opg.me

For the attention of; THE UNITED KINGDOM corporation c/o
1. Dominic of the BRITISH CONSULATE in Malaga Spain & forwarded to our MP via
3. Judge Jackson & Judge Pelling of the ‘Court of Protection’ in inverted commas
4. Diana Smith [investigator of Land Registry asset stripping FRAUD]
5. Steve Doughty & co at DAILY MAIL ‘bias homophobia’, probably from Jewish masonic links.
6. A cunning, devious, slanderous sister Angela Wild and an Angelized brother Kevin Clarke
UPDATED 11TH March 2016
To ALL concerned parties
ref ANN CLARKE CoP10370284 & 20 year carer and son/heir EXECUTOR mike: clarke
I received an email on 3/3/16 in response to an enquiry of any news? Sent to Diana Smith.
Diana Smith has become friends whom is actually investigating Land Registry Fraud restrictions where we made contact via other campaigners in connection with Court of Protection ongoing asset stripping frauds.
Diana stated in her email the following;
That she was making legal enquiries in reference to our case to gain legal assistance and the response she got was intriguing, in her own words, she was told to stay away from our case and was warned OFF it. She also exposes the total ignorance and in her own words rude arrogance of DAILY MAIL biased reporter Steve Doughty, again demonstrating a common purpose approach to bury the innocent injured parties.
The judiciary ie JACKSON probably refers to this as a conspiracy theory but it clearly is not a conspiracy as is demonstrated in Diana’s enquiry. We are not the only ones, there are countless others who cannot get legal representation when the case involves bar members such as ours, against bar members.
ADD to the above the lack of funding and it’s simply a case of thousands that fall by the wayside that cannot obtain any statute justice what so ever.
This warrants the use of common law and commercial liens, WHY NOT. An affidavit statement of NOTARISED truth, WHY NOT, which has attached financial remedy. PRISON by perjury if untrue!
I realise it gets the snouts out of BAR trough where LAWYERS & BARRISTER & JUDGES believe biasedly so, that the LAW is their business and theirs alone, but this is where the conspiracy actually lies because the law is the law and we are all supposedly equal under it, otherwise we have inequality at arms, as is in our case, that just breeds INJUSTICE, making shed loads more money for them, misery for US.
In the 1st page of our 200 page application there was only 2 sections and section 2 was DAMAGES, Judge JACKSON did not address this in any way, shape or form. IS THIS REALLY BRITISH JUSTICE???
There is in existence, a VOID ORDER by a nominated court of protection JUDGE PELLING 2MA90015 Manchester 14 January 2013 for the committal to prison of MICHAEL CLARKE where this civil procedure was objected to by representations of many, referring to right to be tried by JURY & BIAS.
PELLING proceeded in absentia knowing this was a due process denial and also that he was in delinquent BIAS of his duties knowing that the overall case referred to allegations of FRAUD THEFT MAL ADMINISTRATION and now PERSECUTION from the court of protection, so how can he stand as JUDGE in his own cause, WHY did he not recuse himself in favour of a JURY court after representations where made which he throughout physically. THIS IS A TYRANT performing an act of TREASON.
Likewise JACKSON whose colours have now been firmly fixed to the mast of JUSTICE PIRACY where he clearly needs to be investigated in relation to LAND REGISTRY FRAUD where he has clearly breached the WILLS ACT 1837 contrary to part 24 to deny mum rights that would protect her clearly written in her WILL sanctioned by HIM, in a contradiction so in your face it beggars belief!
TODAY we are now seriously concerned that there is a plot to ABDUCT my mother from the SPANISH HOSPITAL, a conspiracy indeed involving the CONSULATE, the FOREIGN OFFICE & Judge JACKSON.
It is for this reason we do hereby again attach and link the LIVING WILL of mum that does as Jackson states have legal force regarding her now protected future by: mike: clarke whom stands in her office as EXECUTOR to protect her and her estate from FRAUD, THEFT, MAL ADMINISTRATION, PERSECUTION & leading to what we now believe could be ABDUCTION.
We seek the immediate re-assurance of the BRITISH CONSULATE & THE FOREIGN OFFICE that no such action will even be attempted and that without such re-assurance by return we will seek assistance from the SPANISH GOVERNMENT for protection from the UNITED KINGDOM.
1. It may kill my mother
2. She has capacity and is not mentally ill
3. It would breach her living will attached
4. It would be classed as abduction
5. Breach human rights article 8
By: mike: clarke in the protection of ann: clarke ASSURANCES NOW RECEIVED THANK YOU
As per the living will linked here www.opg.me/will20082012.pdf
content of Diana’s email:
Hi Mike
Firstly legal friends are warning me to stay clear of your case, which intrigues me.
I have just spoken to Steve Doughty [I had to ring him]
Nasty little person isn’t he?
I now have just written to him, by way of a reply to his rudeness and copied his editor in.
As you know I want to break the back of Land Registry’s involvement with restrictions and charges when the aim is asset stripping.
Just try and sit tight for now.
I will copy you in if I hear back from anyone at the Daily Mail.
COMMERCIAL LIEN content NOW FOLLOWS IN recent email from mike: clarke to DAILY MAIL Doughty;
Commercial Lien Claim
by: mike: clarke

to Steve Doughty of the DAILY MAIL
to Sam Greenhill of the DAILY MAIL
to the editor of the DAILY MAIL
to the chief of the DAILY MAIL
to JUDGE JACKSON of Court of Protection
Reference DAILY MAIL newspaper article on page 29 dated 25.02.2016
Fugitive Michael Clarke drags his mentally ill 75 year old mother around the world after he blew her £775.000 award
Defamation of character VIA LIABLE & SLANDER
In this action/claim against you STEVE DOUGHTY and co. LISTED ABOVE it is based on a rebuttal of your article on what I know to be the truth and if you can rebut ALL the allegations then there is no claim to be made;
It is my understanding;
1. A newspaper reporter shall report the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth thus his content will be factual and unbiased based on his research etc. and that the failure of such will leave open to such a reporter a claim for defamation of characters do you agree YES or NO if NO please explain in a full rebuttal
2. When you’re appointed freelance photographer reporters found us on the day that you printed your article I asked him why you had gone to print with totally the wrong story to which his reply was, because yesterday we did not know where you were! Do you think you should of waited until you found me or that had you researched a little further you would of found my website where all the facts were there in documented and chronological order… please answer YES or NO if No please provide your reasons in a full rebuttal
3. You had interviewed my sister and brother at their homes for their side of the story and obviously printed some of what they said in haste without fully checking facts in which you have a duty to do… would you agree YES or NO if not please answer in a full rebuttal
4. 20 years ago in 1996 I started caring for my mum without one penny, in fact I was struggling financially and continued to care for 6 years before mum s award came along. Equally after her award ran out in 2012 because of fraud theft mal administration and persecution by the court of protection I then looked after her to date without any money just her state pension and my care allowance of £60 per week so to recap 10 years care without money before and after award and 10 years care in-between with award money. Does this strike you as a man who’s care was based solely on money please answer YES or NO and if you do believe YES please answer in a rebuttal WHY
5. 20 years ago my sister Angela Wild made 2 promises to her mother after her tragic accident in which;
a/ That if mum agreed to sell her then current house to her at a knock down price… Angela would care for her mother indefinitely in that very same house and
b/ That Angela would also pay her mother from the profit a sum of £5000 of which a short time after Angela paid her mother one day £50 off the debt…. Acknowledging that this debt was indeed all agreed leaving a balance of £4950… Weeks later or maybe a couple of months, Angela evicted her own mother out of that house dumping her at my public house saying I cannot do it she will have to go into a home.
Why did she bring her to me? Mum did not want to go into a home and thought she had secured her future with her daughter within what was back then mum’s own home that the daughter Angela Wild had effectively stole.. Because from that day to this she never paid mum one single penny of the balance of £4950 owing to her mother. Do you think that the cunning daughter my sister Angela Wild has misled you, the court, her own mother, her brother… please answer YES or NO if NO please answer in a full rebuttal
6. 20 years ago mum arrived at my then PUBLIC HOUSE in a state of DOUBLE INCONTINENCE and in a wheelchair where spasticity in her legs was fixed at a 90 degree angle and so could not stand up, get to the toilet etc., neither did I have any facilities for her on the ground floor of my pub and neither did I have any accessibility for disabled to go upstairs where I had to carry her in my own 2 arms to bed and bring her down during the day same way.. How much money do you believe I did this for??? PLEASE answer in a full rebuttal
7. The doctors around that time 1997 told me mums chances to walk again were next to zero and that because her legs were fixed at 90 degrees they wanted to cut the ham strings so that she would have more freedom and comfort in bed etc… but I refused this operation instead I talked the doctors into the 2nd option cutting the ham strings halfway and stretching her legs to almost straight in 2 separate operations where after each operation her legs were in plaster paris for 6 weeks and I then had to “drag” mum around with a zimmer frame for months to get her to walk again in which when success came the doctors were dumbfounded, so how much money do you think I did this for??? PLEASE answer in a full rebuttal
8. 1996 Double incontinence mum had because she could not get to a toilet… after her operations 2 off and then months of pains taking care to get her walking against all what doctors had said to be a waste of time it finally paid off and mum could then WALK to the toilet… what would you personally have paid to actually get to that stage yourself if you were in that position… can you just imagine it for one minute.. And then put a value on it… because I did this for LOVE not for money and I did it single handed, no family assistance NONE.. please do not be conceited I actually want your views on this based on money because this is what makes you tick, its what makes my sister tick, the courts business is all based on money and so too are the solicitors so do not skip over this very valuable section respond accordingly
9. It was expressed at the time 1997 of getting mum to walk by the then solicitor LYNDSEY WISE of ALEXANDER HARRIS SOLICITORS whom was pursuing the lawsuit against the health authority that I was damaging the case without specific reference to getting mum to walk she in her money based mind had showed me that her claim of £1.7 million pounds was more important than mum WALKING which of course diminished the claim this is how the system WORKS money, money, money… no thought for mum that it might be in her best interest for her to WALK!!! IF it were you, would YOU rather walk and be a financially lighter please answer in a full rebuttal.
10. The CLAIM at the time of £1.7 million pounds had gathered momentum and we were living in TENERIFE me and mum in a one bedroomed apartment 1999 where by the year 2000 arrived my sister ANGELA wanted her mother living back in the UK with her and in order to help facilitate this reported that we were living in Tenerife off a credit card in mother s name running up a bill… the truth of course is.. that benefits had temporary been stopped upon investigation where my MP was brought in to correct matters and the time this took needed a financial filler and ANGELA was well aware of this as the credit card application for mum went to MY mums old house that ANGELA had thrown her mother out of and ANGELA fraudulently signed this application in her mother name in order that she could have a financial filler but then later reported this credit card abuse as though it was me to the lawsuit solicitor LYNDSAY WISE causing huge waves in the overall case that had to be settled early for a sum that was less than half of the original claim.. ARE you beginning to get the picture of how devious a sister/daughter will and can be in order to get at the money where ever it may be ie., £4950 owed to mum from mums house sale cheap to her daughter in exchange for a promise to be cared for there, then to be thrown out onto the street!!! Later reported in credit card fraud that ANGELA facilitated by signature! DO YOU THINK ANGELA WILD is devious??
11. 2001 the money arrived and so did the world and his dog wanting to wipe ANNs arse… after doing this for 6 years without a shilling… all of a sudden… all kinds of people came out from the woodwork… and who was on the hit list to be removed 1st do you think??? Well after looking back on it now I can clearly say it was me, they all wanted me out of the way and so the conspiracy began… it started with the disagreement as to where mum should live and that this was all in the face of 2 clinical doctors stating mum had capacity to manage her own affairs, live where she wanted and with whom. THE STORY is unreal and continued from that day to this one that we are in right now, I could easily have written a book via the website diary www.opg.me . The 1st real financial abuse came in year one 2001 when the appointed deputy HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES paid mum £200 a week to live whilst he STOLE £507 weekly??? 1st years charges £26,377 supposed to be £2000 can you find out what this was for?? Because we can’t? The corruption hides behind a facade of client confidentiality. SO do you think that these charges are reasonable?? Please answer
12. 2008 after disillusionment in the UK we emigrated to SPAIN. OUT of the jurisdiction of the UK and with capacity reports 2 off mum requested her remaining cash estate of £220,000 but was refused by the Office of the Public Guardian/Court of Protection. After the euro of 1.5 to the pound started plummeting causing huge stress and over 5 years of wrangling writing to all known official bodies the COURT lost mum £100,000 in exchange rate losses by 2012 this was under the guise of the court of protection a position of PARENS PATREA not my control as you so boldly mention in your article but the deputy appointed agent of the court of protection… what you stated was defamation was it not??? YES or NO if NO please rebut
13. 2012 money ran out by no fault of mine as we had tried to prevent that… all provable?? YES do you agree?? If not please explain WHY?
14. A court convened to deliver a committal order to prison must be under law one, of a nature of FAIR, IMPARTIAL & UNBIASED nature agree YES or NO if NO please answer.
15. JACKSON did not issue a prison sentence in 2013 can you confirm YES or NO and if your answer is YES as in your article please explain WHY because his name was PELLING and it was UNPUBLISHED.
16. WHY was it UNPUBLISHED?? PELLING was a NOMINATED COURT of PROTECTION Judge, Judging in his own cause by delinquent BIAS as my claims of FRAUD THEFT MAL ADMINISTRATION were all against the state owned and operated BAR/Court of Protection a collection of fraud enablers using the facade of client confidentiality to cover criminality, a BIAS is UNLAWFUL.. Do you agree it needs a JURY and if NOT WHY NOT…. PLEASE ANSWER
17. You claim my mother is mentally ill… we hold reports to the contrary 4 off please answer with factual evidence to back up your advertised story claiming what you do about my mother whom incidentally has capacity.. please answer
18. The COURT of Protections jurisdiction STOPS at the borders of ENGLAND & WALES since when and where does it state its jurisdiction is worldwide please answer
19. A person whom holds a clinical neuro specialist doctors report that confirms she has capacity to decide where to live in the world and with whom should not have her HUMAN RIGHTS article 8 taken from her… Entitlement to a private life… would you agree yes or NO if NO please provide a full rebuttal response
20. A persons rights under article 6 a fair trial giving full due process is a HUMAN RIGHT do you agree and if NOT why not?? Please provide a detailed response…
21. That a GAY person/carer is entitled by law without any problem what so ever to take his mother to a GAY event YES would you agree or not if not please answer with lawful reason
22. That a GAY person can photograph his mother with male models if she so wishes to have that photo taken yes would you agree or not if not please answer in full
23. Your article not only repulsive in lies demonstrated above, was also soaked in anti-GAY sentiment showing your homophobia of racial discrimination yes do you agree or not if not why not please respond with clear and precise answers
24. The court of protections purpose is to protect and provide for a person’s needs ….. Where in JACKSON’s latest judgement does he take care of Ann’s needs…. In 2015 November I submitted a statement to the court explaining Ann’s needs… one of which was a proper BED… one that might have prevented bed sores??? Are you getting the picture?? Ann made the application NOT me.. to sell her house on the 31st of JULY 2015 marked URGENT… do you think this kind of treatment is correct… yes or no if YES please explain in full
25. In 2013 when we were persecuted out of our own country into exile leaving behind all Ann’s facilities ie walking aids bed etc & HOME… ANN could walk onto a plane and walk off one but 2 years of persecution without all Ann’s needs being met she finally succumbed to NOT being able to WALK approx. 9 months ago to a year who would you say is to blame??? Do you really think the 20 year carer son stole and mal administered Ann’s finances that were under the control of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN/Court of Protection????? NO or YES if yes please explain in full and I mean in FULL
26. The six figure pay out was under the court of protection whom failed to protect it.. in fact they plundered it in acts of fraud THEFT etc and then tried to cover their actions by trying unlawfully to get the 20 yr carer son into prison to STOP SILENCE GAGG and PERVERT any common law justice being sought under a COMMERCIAL LIEN statement affidavit of the NOTARISED truth being published…. They falsely used harassment laws to generate their false claim and denied representation in an act of treasonable due process denial, ALL in blatant acts of misconducts in public office that you by your article have added weight to in defamation of our characters that your publics comments 700 of copied have not fallen for, seeing through with ease the lies portrayed that you are guilty of… AGREED yes or NO if no please answer
27. The law provides that if a notice is published that material content cannot be used from a website or indeed a facebook page without the express permission of the owner and that on a prior date this >> NOTICE TO FACEBOOK OR GOVERNMENTS OR AGENTS OF By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. THIS was published on my facebook page which by the use of my photos and videos and written context the DAILY MAIL have clearly breached and as such are liable for damages. AGREED yes or no if NO please provide in full your reply
28. The damages that I claim extend to the worldwide publicity that has resulted from the DAILY MAIL article into the USA & EUROPE via THE SUN, The EURO WEEKLY and USA NEWS + BBC TV, that the damage caused is probably beyond recovery and where notice was issued last week to s.doughty@dailymail.co.uk he has failed to respond with even an acknowledgement shows to me that he feels safe in his contempt that he can print what he likes without fear from a carer whom he describes as on the run without any money to pursue him for harm and loss and so this affidavit commercial lien will represent such a claim under common law and a response would be welcome by way of an apology and retraction to start with and without it please respond here as to WHY??
29. The trust I had in the Daily Mail to uncover Court Of Protection wrong doing was demonstrated in my emails to the judge or the court on lots of matters over 5 years that were actually copied in to the managingeditor@dailymail.co.uk where a response never came but was the address used by other victims and so too I started using… to have such a massive major abuse of this trust thrown right in my face in just what can only be described as a pack of lies was personally extremely damaging and I believe the comments on the article, that incidentally I have tried to make and not been allowed, show the public feel let down by the DAILY MAIL and rightly so.. Such damages should reflect the injuries caused… anything to the contrary RESPOND.
30. The word ‘FUGITIVE’ I have placed into inverted comma’s as your paper did in the article about Stephen Fry and his ‘HUSBAND’ expressing again the DAILY MAIL ‘journalists’ homophobic tendencies, meaning to cast doubt as in a ‘FUGITIVE’ of justice when in reality there has been NO JUSTICE offered only TYRANTS performing TREASON to suit a STOP SILENCE GAGG & PERVERTION of real common law justice taking place, so without the real hard facts and truth ‘YOU’ are committing acts of defamation from gutter press ‘JOURNALISM’ probably by reason that 96% of the world’s media is JEWISH owned, alongside UK COURTS coming under JEWISH rules ie HEAD of the SUPREME court Lord Neuberger a JEW presiding over Christian JUSTICE! THIS is called TALMUD LAW by STEALTH and TALMUDIC LAW rules indicates that Christians have no rights to PROPERTY MONEY or JUSTICE! DOES all this stench smell, of a vile conspiracy to defame, intimidate and DEFRAUD JUSTICE?? PLEASE respond I will be interested to see your JEWISH MASONIC rebuttal!
31. PROPERTY MONEY & JUSTICE have all been denied to ANN CLARKE, ann: clarke can go abroad and be free to go, but the Jewish UK ‘Christian’ courts ARE IN FACT denying ann: her right to EXCHANGE, SELL or BUY PROPERTY anywhere else in the WORLD with her own estate of money and property, ALL in the face of 4 doctors that provided clinical examinations attesting to her capacity resulting in FRAUD, THEFT, MAL ADMINSTRATION & PERSECUTION! Show me your rebuttal with evidence to support JUSTICE has been served upon ANN & mike.
32. ANNs carer has been the subject of aspersions cast upon him by persons with only hearsay and after serving documents recorded delivery requiring that the BROTHER Kevin Clarke & the SISTER Angela Wild provide tangible proof of so called financial concerns NONE HAS BEEN PROVIDED but yet the carer/EXECUTOR of 20 years is providing chronological proof of the FRAUDs THEFTs and MAL ADMINISTRATION on www.opg.me of his mother’s estate by the United Kingdom corporation PUBLIC GUARDIANS agent/deputy HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES whom, is being backed by JEWdiciary of the court of protection, PROTECTING THEMSELVES, please provide your rebuttal showing proof of the newspapers aspersions cast.
33. FRAUD, The sister/daughter has in matter of fact stole from her mother by stealth cash & 2 previous properties known as 53 Kensington Avenue Royton Oldham & 12 Watlington Close Sholver Oldham and is currently via the court of protection attempting to gain the 3rd.. Please show in your rebuttal how a daughter/brother should have any input what so ever in their own mothers life when that mother holds medical evidence to support her capacity to choose her own life choices on where to live and with whom… FRAUD in my eyes to suit a money based business COURT.. Please respond demonstrating where the justice is in this?
34. RACKETEERING if you look up the word is what best describes what is in effect going on… The Court of Protection does nothing but to protect its own racketeering of GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUDS that the conspiring media behind them have teamed up to help undermine a single man’s attempt to expose the corruption leading to the question HOW MUCH DID YOU GET to write the story?? Please respond to rebut racketeering allegations and fee for story.
35. Commercial Liens are a common law remedy where statute remedy no longer exists as per demonstrated in the letter by Diana Smith where when seeking representation for this case she was warned off it, this being the case in all attempts to get representation not just by me but others too fighting court of protection corruption ie Gary Hollis, Len Lawrence, Jean James etc to name but a few.. we also on our website document many news articles mainly on JUDGES stating the current JUSTICE system is unfit for the poor, on this basis the court of protection now has a free for all to do just what it pleases without fear, with impunity, it can freely just financially rape the vulnerable and WHO is going to STOP them?? WELL it is my goal to STOP them via commercial liens and when such a commercial lien is only a statement of truth that has been notarised what might one begin to ask is why should that be a problem?? When, is it not a fact, the truth is what we aim to expose otherwise the BAR has a monopoly on any lies they choose to accept as the truth. In reality also an untruth in a commercial lien is punishable by perjury and result in prison. SO if the commercial lien process is not acceptable please answer fully as to why not?
36. SLANDER is a word used today by my sister in response to this document but she has now been placed on notice that I have documents awaiting service upon her that will in turn be placed upon the land registry against her property’s because the SLANDER started in this case from her herself on several occasions is now required the documentary evidence to support such hearsay slander that she has used that in turn the DAILY MAIL has relied upon to print such a defamatory article that has left no choice but to find remedy. I accuse you the DAILY MAIL of slander, liable and defamation without any evidence to back it up.. please respond.
37. I will now turn my attention further to Ann’s BEST INTERESTS
FRAUD The first best interest for Ann would be that the court of protection via the OPG had NOT committed FRAUD upon her by not respecting her carer’s actions on reporting FRAUD and in fact trying to dispose of him to prison for whistleblowing a multi-billion pound on going FRAUD not just on Ann but many others too such as the LEONARD LAWRENCE case, the Gary HOLLIS case, the YVONNE GODER case, the PETER HOFSHROER case, the JEAN JAMES case and countless other victims, too many to mention many being falsely imprisoned such as WANDA MADDOCKS case and the KATHY DANBY case. FRAUDS which at best, the investigation from the OPG had to offer lasted 7 long months and resulted in a 3 line email saying no wrong had been done! WHOSE best interest was THAT in?? THE London PRO BONO charity barristers analysis of the case in January last year identified with ease a case to answer for Ann’s losses which even after reporting these facts the court of protection conveniently ignore. Not only ignoring this but also ignoring ALL other facts that have not been in Ann’s Best Interests.
38. THEFT- It is in Ann’s best interest that THEFT reported be acted upon and thoroughly investigated by POLICE which has been reported 4 times but that white collar crimes of FRAUD are very low on the priority of the POLICE because they judge each reported crime on the potential merit of a prosecution in which it is a well-documented FACT that the criminal element running the show prefer COVER UP before EXPOSURE – Not in Ann’s best interest.
39. MAL ADMINISTRATION – For Ann’s best interest it would be, that the court of protection to get its house in order where there currently is no accountability, not just accountability of Ann’s estate but the accountability of JUDGES whom are acting ultra vires now on an industrial scale of treasonous acts ignoring their OATHS of OFFICE that are not in Ann’s best interests.
40. CRIMINAL NEGLECTION of INDUSTRIAL SCALE – In Ann’s best interest it would have been best to address the 200 page http://opg.me/urgentapplication01092015.pdf by the reduced 8 page http://opg.me/jacksonorder.pdf with the 5 page http://opg.me/vacateyourorder.pdf NOTICE plus these 6 pages here being a total of 219 pages of CRIMINAL NEGLECTION by a dereliction of JUDICIAL DUTY under parens patriae which is finally capped with the 5 pages here of http://opg.me/NOTICEOFMISPRISIONofTREASON.pdf TOTAL = 224 pages.
41. PERSECUTION – Of Ann and her carer is not in her best interests either and it would be Ann’s best interest to put a STOP to THAT with immediate effect by the removal of PELLINGs VOID order but that the ruling criminal elite will no doubt continue… NOT in Ann’s best interest.
42. If this court really want to act in Ann’s best interest –
a) Provide accountability and scrutiny of Ann’s stolen estate to a forensic level as obviously there has been and is prima facia evidence to support an investigation.
b) Provide accountability in the court arena where when required such as here under COMMON LAW required that it is not retained under the ADMIRALTY LAW of the SEA
c) Provide Judicial accountability instead of just words ie in your own words JACKSON ‘the law is completely inaccessible to those it was intended’ NICE WORDS now ACTION
d) Provide proof that the state has Ann’s best interests at heart because where I stand NOW as EXECUTOR I have seen NONE.. not just in Ann’s case but many others too.
e) The STATE of the UK STATE is such that criminality is running rampant throughout its fabric of governmental departments and justice systems that cannot be denied. THIS clearly is NOT in Ann’s best interest to be any future part of it in it’s current form.
f) WITHOUT clear and concise actions to remedy each and every persons claim of injustice, matters are only going to spiral out of control downwards a fact We attach as financial remedy £1 million pounds per bullet point that is NOT fully responded to that shall be applied with vicarious liability to STEVE DOUGHTY, SAM GREENHILL, The Editor and Chief to be later named and documented. TOTAL VALUE £42 MILLION POUNDS


Please respond to email mike@rake.net

The LINK between the Daily Mail Editor Paul Michael Dacre and the Court of Protection can be seen on Wikipedia where the founder of the Court of Protection JACK STRAW and him were mates.
Dacre was born and grew up in the London suburb of Arnos Grove in Enfield.[7] His father, Peter, was a journalist on the Sunday Express whose work included show business features.[8][9][10] His brother, Nigel, was editor of ITV's news programmes from 1995 to 2002.[11]
He was educated at University College School, an independent school in Hampstead, on a state scholarship,[12] where he was head of house.[13] In his school holidays, he worked as a messenger at the Sunday Express, and during his pre-university gap year as a trainee in the Daily Express.[10] From 1967 he read English at the University of Leeds,[14] where Jack Straw was President of the Student's Union,[13] and during this period met his future wife, Kathleen,[2][12] now a professor of drama studies.[6] One of their two sons,[2] James, is a theatre director.[15][16]
While at university, he became involved with the Leeds Student newspaper, rising to the position of editor. At this time he identified with the liberal end of the political spectrum on issues including gay rights and drug use,[17] and wrote editorials in support of a student sit-in at Leeds organised by Straw.[18] "'If you don’t have a left-wing period when you go to university, you should be shot'", he has said.[10] On graduation in 1971, he joined the Daily Express in Manchester for a six-month trial;[12] after this he was given a full-time job on the Express. Concerning his career choice, Dacre commented in an interview for the British Journalism Review in 2002 that he "never any desire to do anything other than journalism".[10]

MARCH 8 2016 Visiter No.627990 to www.opg.me
EURO WEEKLY NEWS another paper to persue

FEBRUARY 25 2016 Visiter No.627640 to www.opg.me
ALL lies of course totally the opposite and the comments from the public show their contempt for the Daily Mail in not looking further into the real truth before printing such truth instead of a pack of lies designed to further intimidate the injured parties.

FEBRUARY 15 2016 Visiter No.627190 to www.opg.me
Today on the 15th February 2016 after several consultations with the Doctor that had not truely sunk in we make a plea on compassionate grounds that their prison order be removed so mum can be brought home to die. For THE VERY URGENT ATTENTION of
15th February 2016
Ref cases 10370284 and Manchester 2MA90015
From the occupant of the office of EXECUTOR Of both estates ANN CLARKE and MICHAEL CLARKE
I, mike clarke, do hereby state as per doctors in SPAIN, that my mother’s medical condition is more than likely terminal.
I require out of compassionate respect, that your prison order, considered void, as per supplied statements, be removed with immediate effect on compassionate grounds in order that I may return my mum home to her property to die in the place she originally wanted to be till her demise surrounded by her family.
The doctor’s prognosis is such that she has a serious hip bone infection from a bed sore, which is so serious that their prognosis is that death is very likely, given time.
Mum has been removed of IV therapy and is receiving the relevant drugs orally as well as hydration.
She is currently smiling and upbeat and not currently showing signs of fever from septicaemia and as such her current condition would benefit from a 2 hour flight home.
My sister whom has returned to the UK today tried to talk mum into leaving without me, apparently, in which mum became irritable and agitated saying NO she would not go without me.
This matter is serious and is short and to the point, mum is terminally ill and I believe if she has the slightest of chance to actually get through this then she needs her own home.
By mike clarke EXECUTOR...
please act urgently, please!! Mikes Mobile 0034 602568239

FEBRUARY 11 2016 Visiter No.627111 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.627083 to www.opg.me
ANN MALLABY How is your mum, Mike? Have you been able to get her treatment? If desperate, consider in-home IV therapy. As you know, Britain's a dangerous place for the elderly - they're too readily terminated. Shazad Hussain tried to prevent the termination (murder) of his brother Nazam after he 'fell' out of a top storey window at the council's flagship nursing home. The senior officer warned him there'd be "repercussions" if he sued them: they brought a malicious prosecution of fraud and he's now in prison. His disabled mum and schizophrenic brother relied on Shazad, their sole carer. They'll most likely be taken into 'care' now, and terminated. What a terrible regime we live under! Family carers being imprisoned and their dependants terminated. You're doing your best for your mum, all credit to you. Kind regards Ann

FEBRUARY 10 2016 Visiter No.627053 to www.opg.me
AWAKE EARLY AND WORRIED AT 6am I write this statement. The UK GOV. authorities are culpable with gross criminal negligence of attempted murder of my mother.
On the date ??? I made a statement demonstrating the URGENCY for the release of mums property to sell it.. within that statement contain her requirements, one of which was a proper bed for her etc. The original application was made 6 months ago on the 31st JULY 2015
The MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICE being played out by a posse of names ie Joanne EARLEY Court of Protection manager whom had previously apologised for a 2 months delay, losing her application, served me a court order by email, accepted honourably, but in return I issued documents to the JUDGE that she acted in DISHONOUR by refusal to serve... same for Judge Jacksons email clerk ALEXANDER MORTON whom also has failed to respond to 4 emails requiring confirmation of documents delivered.
Taken all round one also can attach by vicarious liability the culpable negligence to our MP Gordon Mardens office of silence in the face of urgent responses to a RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION and his failure to act.
Attending to my mothers needs right NOW being the urgent matter it is to be noted that it be my intention to seek advice from MICHAEL DOHERTY about proceeding with private prosecutions of the above liable parties and associated collegues for what may turn out to be a MURDER charge by culpable NEGLIGENCE.
Currently we start this particular day off with a sum total of 7 euros in our pocket. Me n James in a temporary apartment that is in Benalmadena we must make the journey to the hospital in Torremolinos by bus and foot, the bus for 2 costs 3 euros 10 cent each way equals 6 euros 20 cent leaving us .80 cent to eat. I have blisters on my feet from the walking as the bus does not drop off at the hospital there is a walk to do each day. TWICE.
As thursday tomorrow approaches we will only be able to walk to the hospital and my feet will certainly not be in any fit state to do that.
I hate to ask but if anyone out there has the where with all and facility to help we would appreciate it no matter how small.. even a lift to the hospital tomorrow would help but anyone who may want to donate mums account is HSBC 401213 32083639 CLARKE

FEBRUARY 9 2016 Visiter No.627040 to www.opg.me
MUM FINALLY SETTLED WITH A TREATMENT REGIME More improvements to mums appearance and ability to eat and the doctor warned that we were far from out of the woods. We now knew we had took the right decision to fly mum out of THAILAND back to EUROPEAN health care as the bill would of been unaffordable.

FEBRUARY 8 2016 Visiter No.627020 to www.opg.me
3rd HOSPITAL ADMISSION The Doctor here repeated the hip infection seriousness and said that her potential to die was strong but, as long as there was no fever appear in her we were in with a chance subject to mums response of the drug therapy treatment currently being administered with re-hydration etc. MUM was already showing distinct signs of improvement with the return of her ability to swallow and talk and so we began feeding her ourselves alongside the hospital. My sister and brother were telephoned because of the seriousness of potential death and thus my sister arrived at night with eldest grandson Jay. Mum made slight improvements

FEBRUARY 7 2016 Visiter No.627000 to www.opg.me
ADMISSION TO HOSPITAL TODAY Midday transferrred mum by taxi to BENALMADENA Evolution hospital for assessment. After 6 hours mum was transferred to University hospital Malaga. Her condition described as poor but vital organs ok.. infections detected in urine and kidney and more serious in her HIP. The doctor here after asking about her hips and what had occured he went on to say that my diagnosis of mosquito bite was untrue and that her hip infection was the result of a bed sore from the lack of turning or movement during her sleep that she had had for some time. The infection he said was very serious and potentially life threatening. Later that day she was transferred again to the MARITIMO Hopital Torremolinos.

FEBRUARY 6 2016 Visiter No.626980 to www.opg.me
MOSCOW TO MALAGA We boarded in full snow on the ground a flight to MALAGA SPAIN that was 5 hours duration arriving in Spain at 11pm... mum was so tired I could not place her into hospital to have her sitting around being prodded and poked so decided to try get her settled for the 1st night in a hotel which we did.

FEBRUARY 5 2016 Visiter No.626950 to www.opg.me
URGENTLY LEAVING THAILAND 1030am we passed security at BANGKOK airport and boarded the 10 hour flight to MOSCOW RUSSIA. Upon seating mum in her seat I noticed a little seapage of blood upon her thigh hip left side and slightly panicked. The plane was nearly full and James calmed me down and said not to panick its because we have been moving her around it will quickly qualagulate and stop. We left Bangkok. The flight in the main was OK but after 8 hours mum was beginning to show signs of pain, we managed to lie her down where she appeared to get some sleep. After arriving in MOSCOW that was a foot deep in snow we sat down to take stock. [We considered claiming political asylum in RUSSIA from UK Court of Protection JEWdicial TERRORISM but after seeing the snow on the ground MUM said it was TOO COLD]

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626920 to www.opg.me
URGENT TIME TO DECIDE ON WHAT TO DO My partner of 7 years JAMES MCDERMOTT[24] and I, having duscussed the dire situation we were in where the courts, MP etc were now failing to respond to anything leaving mum vulnerable to death decided that James would ask his father to loan him 1000 pounds. After informing his mother then his father of this request at approx 4pm by 7pm it was in his bank. We then discussed the option of taking mum to THAI hospital and paying the 1000 as deposit for treatment but we expected her prognosis was such that it required a longer stay in hospital and could not keep up with required payments. The Cheapest fastest flight out was available at 10am the following day. WE BOOKED it and hastilly packed.

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626880 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626870 to www.opg.me
Re: Re- where you are in Thailand
To diansmt5
Hi Diana
we are in PATTAYA
The hospital today will NOT admit mum without 50,000 baht on deposit (£1000)
I only had £200 so could not proceed and so mum is just sat here waiting to DIE.
I have tried more food and different drinks but it is very laboured and she is only achieving at best a quarter of what is put before her. She has lost weight and the matter deteriorates by each day.
JAMESs my partner has been trying to raise money via his family which as of yet is of no avail.
Do not know what to do.
THIS application to release mums property IMMEDIATELY was put into the court as an URGENT MATTER last JULY 2015.
What more can I do??
anxious son and 20 year carer of mum 75 disabled with capacity
On February 4, 2016 at 6:08 PM diansmt5@aol.com wrote:

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626868 to www.opg.me
-----Original Message-----
From: diansmt5
To: lyttonj
Sent: Thu, Feb 4, 2016 11:35 AM
Subject: Re- Elderly lady being put at risk by Land Registry involvement of her property
Diana Smith
Corner Farm
Rotten Row
Theddlethorpe St Helen
LN12 1NX
Dear Sir
games are being played with a ladies life , by restrictions placed at Land Registry in regard of a property she owns in Blackpool.
This lady who has been forced to flee England with her long term carer ( her son) , to Thailand, urgently needs medical care and admitting to a hospital today.
Previously her medical fees have been funded by well wishers and because of the urgency of her needs , there is not time to raise funds again to enable acting immediately.
The MP involved is Gordon Marsden and l have had two calls today from a gentleman named john in this MP's Office.
There has to be procedures to release funds this lady is entitled to . If she was resident in the UK , the medical fees potentially would be fifteen times as much as hospital costs where she is presently situated.
Can you advise this MP?
We are likely to see more and more cases like this , as Land Registry, once involved , lack any moral fibre or flexibility and sidestep the real issues of their involvement in what is more and more being perceived as government targeting of vulnerable persons for asset stripping.
Previously Jonathan Smithers in writing assured me that The Law Society is well aware,of the methodology of the fraud behind "over-riding interests" and the complications the open register at Land Registry has allowed, as this was when he headed up the Property / Land Fraud Division of the Law Society and he is now President of The Law Society, with no changes happening to victims of these crimes, perhaps he can be challenged on these very issues?
Kind regards
Diana Smith. Tel. 01507 473053 diansmt5@aol.com

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626860 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626857 to www.opg.me

We also wrote to the NEWSPAPER "THE MATURE TIMES" who we are led to believe are considering publishing the theft of old folks homes.

FEBRUARY 4 2016@3.30am Thai Visiter No.626842 to www.opg.me
She is sleeping soundly at the minute but in the morning we are taking her down to the hospital in THAILAND to receive treatment as she has not been well at all. She is sleeping right now & we THANK YOU again to friends, Steve P & Andy K & Steve H whom have raised some cash to be able to do this and we will keep you all posted.

FEBRUARY 4 2016 Visiter No.626841 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626798 to www.opg.me

BROTHER & SISTER request for help... Regardless of all our differences and that they do not agree with their mothers wishes I remember when our father died of throat cancer and there was no money for the funeral and we all had to fork out £800 each for the £2400 burial. This of course was no problem so why now should it be a problem to help their own mother, to keep her alive, in circumstances where the UK state has stole by fraud and mal administration from her estate, forcing her by persecution into exile as refugees from our homeland, effectively cleansed in an act genocide by a GROSS FUDICIARY TRUST FRAUD of the LEGAL NAME forcing innocents into MARITIME ADMIRALTY jurisdiction against their will, so they can plunder estates to the point of causing death. PLEASE SHARE FAR AND WIDE


BUT yet she has the money to fly to THAILAND and to force her mother back to the UK?? 3 flights@£400 = £1200 KEEP in mind of course that mum is unfit to fly currently and that is if she actually wanted to go, otherwise force would be used.
30 minutes later 2nd MESSAGE from SISTER

REPLY 2 messages received: Remember 20 years ago when you dropped her off at my pub, sorry, dumped her at my pub, saying you could not do it, she needed to go into a care HOME! Why did you do that? Why did you not take her to a care home? I took her in to my pub and have cared for her 20 years and now you SAY.. I am killing her!! HOW utter dispicable you are.

REPLY DID all the other victims of persecution, theft and fraud also fabricate evidence that they have too?? Too many to mention here but a few; LEONARD LAWRENCE PILOT had a house of £750,000 was incapacitated and woke up to find his house had been sold and so had no where to live with only £82,000 change! YVONNE GODER, GARY HOLLIS & his brother ADRIAN, JEAN JAMES, 90 yr old NORMAN SCARTH and many many others not discounting PETER HOFSCHROER, read it, and his mum living in AUSTRIA, a part of EUROPE where his brother whom worked in social service came to AUSTRIA had him arrested on false charges whilst SOCIAL SERVICES UK his brother, abducted the mother BARBARA on to a flight back to UK. EUROPE is all party to the FRAUDs. YOU HAVE NO IDEA whats going on do you? YOU think you own your own house! YOU DONT!

FEBRUARY 3 2016 Visiter No.626778 to www.opg.me

Again my mum is unwell and cannot access her own wealth to fund health care because of RESTRICTIONS by the court of protection probate racketeering mafia, when she has already been financially raped by them, when all along, could prove her capacity. LET it be known here and NOW the UNITED KINGDOM perpetrators of the current RAPE & potential MURDER is JUDGE JACKSON & JUDGE PELLING who have acted outside their remit ultravirusly, treasonously and negligently causing harm, loss and injury probably going to result in MURDER!
I will personally hold all involved fully responsible should my mother progessively become more ill and let this be a warning for you here and NOW! The same shall apply to civil servants such as the vicariously liable MPs GORDON MARSDEN, Sec of STATE for Justice MICHEAL GOVE, attorney general JEREMY WRIGHT and others for this is now becoming a VERY serious matter to me & mum.

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626759 to www.opg.me
Joanne Earley to mike@rake.net
Dear Mike Clarke,
I have nothing further to add to my email of the 1st February 2016 and I will not be acknowledging any further similar messages.
Joanne Earley
Operations Manager
Court of Protection
T: 020 7421 8722
M: 078 2606 9598

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626752 to www.opg.me

FEBRUARY 2 2016 Visiter No.626748 to www.opg.me
& head of courts administration Jillian KAY
Dear Michael, Jeremy, Jillian & Gordon
I am copying you in to the email exchange yesterday with the court of protection manager JOANNE EARLEY.
It would appear to me that JOANNE EARLEY is committing MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE in an effort to PERVERT the course of JUSTICE.
It is becoming extremely urgent that this matter is looked into and properly as matters appear totally unjust & unfair breaching HUMAN RIGHTS.
We have been seeking our RIGHT OF GRIEVENCE PETITION to Parliament through our MP Gordon Marsden which would appear to be to no avail.
It seems OK for the COURT to serve me by email but to serve back by email or even recorded delivery mail - refused!!!
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626747 to www.opg.me
As per our last email which you were copied in below.
The court of protection appear to be picking and choosing which NOTICES to serve on JUDGES and which not!!
THIS to me is MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC office perverting the course of justice.
Therefore can I have confirmation from YOU that all notices in the email below have been served on JUDGE JACKSON.
If not can you please tell the exact process to complete such a service ie
1.his private home mailing address which I am currently researching
2.or the full address for sessions house Preston or
3.what other method you deem fit and proper to serve JUDGE JACKSON
by: mike: clarke

FEBRUARY 1 2016 Visiter No.626729 to www.opg.me
RE: copied Fwd: confirmation required of service
To Joanne Earley — managingeditor and 7 others
Can I just get this correct.
Are you saying that a NOTICE to a JUDGE cannot be served to his place of BUSINESS ie Court of Protection??
If that is so can you please advise by return HOW IS A JUDGE SERVED relevant NOTICEs??
for example a JUDICIAL NOTICE?
Or at the very least what is the address for service of documents for Court of Protection JUDGES, PELLING & JACKSON??
I do have recorded delivery receipts for them.. are you saying the COURT refuses to serve them, having signed for them???
It seems a little confusing when the documents are VERY relevant to the overall case and that your saying I cannot serve a JUDGE through a COURT OF PROTECTION ADDRESS.
It does seem hypocritical when you want to serve me by email and I honourably accept, IS THE COURT ACTING IN DISHONOUR?
Please respond immediately that I may refer the matter to my MP and the ATTORNEY GENERAL and Sec of State for Justice Michael GOVE.
Considering I am in EXILE half way round the world do you think that this is a court acting in HONOUR and in the best interest of terrorised patient with CAPACITY??
Of THE NOTICES CONCERNED.... can you please indicate which ones you have chose NOT to serve which may I point out would indicate an offence of MISCONDUCT IN A PUBLIC OFFICE assuming you are the person deciding what to serve and what not to serve?
http:​//opg.​me/urgentapplication01092015.​pdf​ ORIGINAL APPLICATION NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/jacksonorder.​pdf​ REQUESTED STATEMENT NOTICE
http:​//opg.​me/vacateyourorder.​pdf​ NOTICE TO JUDGE PELLING
http:​//opg.​me/statementtojackson2016.​pdf​ STATEMENT REQUESTED NOTICE
Regards by: mike: clarke

On February 1, 2016 at 6:27 PM Earley, Joanne wrote:
Dear Mike Clarke,
I am writing in response to your email below, documents that you have been directed to file by the court will be forwarded to Mr Justice Peter Jackson, but the court will not serve other documents on your behal