Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
This Website is published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 10(1)READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT


SENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL ANTON LUSH (born 18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants) - in holding the ultimate fudiciary responsibilty to demonstrate there being no fraud or breach of contract of the 1st general order where he stated; “The reasonable fees and expenses of a professional receiver are recoverable from the defendant in the personal injury action as a head of damage. They do not simply fall on the patient’s fund.” & for ignoring the doctors reports stating my mother had capacity from the beginning and then sending his own corrupt doctor whom did not conduct a clinical examination. Also for his collusion with the perpetrator of further crimes, his appointed deputy...
DEPUTY RECEIVER & CROOK HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES ( born on 24/06/1955 ) and his failure to account as to what had happened to £1.1 million pounds inclusive of his breach of contract in the 1st general order stating; “the family should rest assured that my costs will not be eroding the capital settlement agreed for their mothers care and other specific needs.” & his 'fraud by false representation' when the patient emigrated outside the jurisdiction of England & Wales losing £100,000 of the client funds in exchange rate losses in a 'neglect of duty'. meeting 07.02.2011 - meeting 18.07.2011 - others to follow
MARTIN JOHN - the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian and his failure to provide a proper detailed investigation showing good reasons to show there was no theft fraud mal administration.
CHIEF CONSTABLE PETER FAHY for his failure to investigate a reported white collar crime of Theft Fraud and Mal administration and also provide a crime reference number on the 4 occasions it has been asked for. Further today 30/11/2013 Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy READ.
JUDGE PETER ARTHUR BRIAN JACKSON (born 9 December 1955), for his failure to take account of the LIVING WILL that he authorised mums capacity to make & then after reading it where he later then, ring fenced her property giving an order that it could not be sold in her lifetime, so that she could not do with it as she pleased with her living will executor wilfully breaching 'part 24' of the WILLS act 1837.
JUDGE ADMINISTRATOR MARK PELLING QC and so called "Nominated COURT OF PROTECTION Judge" whom conducted a TREASONOUS, BIASED, UNFAIR administrative statute tribunal, WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY & without the consent of all parties where he abandoned the court to have our representation thrown out by security after they claimed common law jurisdiction and requested a JURY after which he returned to hand down a 3 month prison sentence to the protected party/CARER of 17 years flying in the face of statute Mental Capacity ACt 2005 section 5 and thus the protection of carers from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a so called patient of the court of protection whom
HOLDS CAPACITY!
Watch a video statement by my representation to radio station of 7mins
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?

INTRODUCTION TO A BRIEF STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE
READ our submission to the House of Lords select committee meeting on Mental Capacity Act, Committee. Where this submission along with lots of others containing vital evidence have been returned, deleted or just unread because Chairman LORD HARDIE said, 'they contain NAMES'!!! So er, hang on if you go to the POLICE as we have and do not give a name how can they investigate... not that the POLICE do anyway as they too will not even give reference numbers/log numbers!! The term to remove let's say sensitive information is called REDACTION would it not have been the most polite thing to do is remove the names but keep the evidence that the most vulnerable, 'hands on' people, suffering at the hands of the Mental Capacity Act could be heard!! What we have here LORD HARDIE is another whitewash dismissing the most vulnerable people in another act of FRAUD!
Read the 1st general order of the 20.03.2001 pdf in particular the highlighted paragraphs.
READ the Sibling's lack of CREDABILITY statements 19.1.2012.
In 1998 READ the Total Original Claim of £1.7 million and in it you will see the schedule for receiver costs based on the full claim & a lifespan of 83(not 70 as stated by deputy HUGH JONES). You will see also the setup costs schedule of £4000(not £26,377 as was charged by HUGH JONES).
The reduced compromised settlement was £775,000. You can see where an appeal on the grounds of capacity was unsuccesfully made with 2off 4 hour clinical specialists stating my mother had capacity READ here & this Dr's back up telephone converstaion to Listen to, stating my mother should not be under that court.
You can Listen here to the 40 minute!! unclinical exam from the state's court, a Doctor Khan, that was the pinacle deciding factor for DENZIL LUSH(Matser of the court) to keep mum under the court.
10 years later & we commissioned 2 more doctors of 4 hour exams claiming my mother still has capacity READ the 2010 & READ the 2011.
So on and so forth... if you take the time to read the diary here from the bottom to the top it will demonstrate the shear corruption and evil forces at work upon the vulnerable. Further, that the whistleblower, whom just so happens to be the long standing carer of 17 years and eldest son, is in for stitch up & persecution from the judiciary that will lead to a corrupt prison sentence, where the establishment closes ranks to protect itself using a bent judicial system to meter out what they would term as purged rehabilitation.
BIAS is unlawful in a court of law but here it exudes itself, brimming to overfull, and with impunity, where an 'admiralty administrative statute hearing' calling itself the 'court of protection' gives clear focus in the lack of FAIRNESS and IMPARTIALITY boasting it's BIAS without any fear.
My mother's vacant property, slowly degrading, stands now as a monument to the hypocrisy of UK INJustice, once renowned internationally, that's degenerated into a mafia run racket, committing financial rape on vulnerable people, where the rule of COMMON LAW has been tossed onto the scrap heap infavour of their own BIASED legalese of statutes conducting itself without IMPARTIALITY and FAIRNESS no doubt leading to an uprising of social unrest that the evidence is already here to see by the pockets of growing organisations of rebellion.
There are several criminals in this saga but our case would lay the main injustice allegations with 4 co conspiritors, that being
No1 SENIOR JUDGE DENZIL LUSH(master of the court of protection & the person with ultimate fudiciary responsibilty)
No2 Solicitor HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES(Deputy receiver whom clear evidence here points to him being the crook in the frame) &
No3 MARK PELLING QC(Stitch up facilitator) and co ordinator as a NOMINATED Court of Protection Judge to remove any whistleblowers to prison by any crooked method using BIASED means, lacking impartiality and fairness with hearsay allowed, without prosecution witnesses in a tribunal lacking CONSENT & a requested Jury where your own representation has no right of audience and is thrown out.
No4 HONOURABLE JUSTICE PETER JACKSON who we have just added(25.09.2013) due to his inability to recognise the injustice and act HONOURABLY in fact quite the contrary JACKSON ignored the LIVING WILL that he authorised my mother's capacity to make and then he RING FENCED the property in a FRAUD cover up facilitated by LAND REGISTRY.
Mr Jackson has stated openly that “Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised” End Quote… but yet he also is stated on wikipiedia as a person who is a "master tactician (link)[who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," where here these TYRANTS ("one who rules without law, looks to his own advantage rather than that of his subjects, and uses extreme and cruel tactics—against his own people as well as others") are stalking me, & my mothers house/home READ.
ALL four TYRANTS are paid from the racketeering products of the FRAUDULENT Court of Protection/NEGLECTION/CORRUPTION.

WE ARE CONTEMPLATING CLAIMING POLITICAL ASYLUM FROM PERSECUTION BY THE CORRUPT BRITISH JUDICIARY

2013 DEC 9 LORD HARDIE to MIKE CLARKE
READ how Lord Hardie of the mental capacity act select committee investigating the abuses of the mental capacity act rejects our submission in another example of fraud cover up of ongoing abuses because he said, 'it contains named individuals'!

2013 DEC 8 FACEBOOK CAMPAIGN

2013 DEC 8 SELECT COMMITTEE FRAUD COVER UP

2013 DEC 7 JUDGE CLARIFIES CONTEMPT OF COURT LAW
England’s most senior family law judge has issued a strongly worded clarification of earlier guidance on the use of prison sentences for contempt of court. Sir James Munby is President of the Family Division of the High Court. In May he issued succinct official guidance on prison sentences in such cases, entitled ‘Committal for contempt of court’. The guidance was firmly focused on the principle of open justice in both family cases and the Court of Protection. The latter makes judgements on behalf of people with learning and similar difficulties.
The guidance declared: “It is a fundamental principle of the administration of justice in England and Wales that applications for committal for contempt should be heard and decided in public, that is, in open court.”
The judge noted that while both the Court of Protection and the family courts, when dealing with children, have the power to hold hearings in private, but he stressed that this should only be done “in exceptional cases where is it is necessary in the interests of justice”. The involvement of children or sensitive material is not sufficient reason in itself to hold hearings behind closed doors, the judge stated.
Paragraphs four and five of the guidance state that closed committal proceedings should always begin in public, and if the court then decides to go behind closed doors, it should give a judgement setting out the reasons for continuing the hearing in private.
When courts do impose prison sentence behind closed doors, they should identify the person, and state their sentence and nature of the person’s contempt in public.
The President wrote: “This is mandatory; there are no exceptions. There are never any circumstances in which any one may be committed to custody without these matters being publicly stated.”
Section 6 of the guidance stated that every case in which a prison sentence or suspended prison sentence is issued for contempt of court, a transcript of the judgement must be made available and published on the BAILII legal judgement website.
In June, Sir James Munby issued supplementary guidance, further emphasising the need to only hear cases in private when doing so in the interests of justice.
Now, the President states, “a question has arisen to “whether paragraph 6 of the original Guidance applies in all committal cases or only in cases to which paragraphs 4 and 5 apply” – ie children’s or Court of Protection cases heard in private.
Sir James in unequivocal: “Paragraph 6 applies in EVERY case in which a committal order or a suspended committal order is made, WITHOUT EXCEPTION.”
The President stressed: “The principle is very clear and MUST be rigorously followed.”
No one must ever be sent to prison without proper details being made publicly available via the BAILII website, he stated.
“We shall be subject to strong and entirely justifiable criticism” if anyone is ever sent to prison without the publication of such details, Sir James declared. In my case the Judgement was not published. WHY? Remedy from private prosecution... READ

2013 DEC 7 RECORD EVERYTHING AND SPEAK OUT
Sir James Munby has said family hearings should be held in public, that social workers should be named in court, and that families who feel wronged should be able to speak out publicly, so do it and do not listen to the threats and manacing of the state child stealing agents who should all go to prison including the Judge who made this decission, his own son a drug addict, no wonder with a father who can order this obscenity! Record all dealings with any state agents, all of them for your own protection and to protect your children from this kind of criminal act.

2013 DEC 7 FILES MISSING
listen to meeting 07.02.2011 Not for the first time in what could be a collusion between our internet server and Pannone we find some files deleted or missing and they appear to be the direct recordings of meetings with HUGH JONES and thus we raise the profile here of a reposted meeting from February 2011 containing a serious insight to events that unfolded at the time. In this meeting you might begin to understand the family fall out through the lack of a proper care payment to me the carer.

2013 DEC 7 LAYMANS COURT OF PROTECTION
READ about laymans view of the court of protection and once accepting the above, a once closed mind might then accept that the abuse of vulnable people has been happening behind closed doors for decades. If it all leaked out there would be a great public outcry. So ‘in the public interest’ kicks in where it states that if the information damages the ‘trust’ in an LA or other authority, it would not be allowed in the public domain, hence the need for secrecy as in family courts. Problem is that most people tend to keep their heads down and not confront certain subjects wrongly believing it could never happen to them. Hence while the cat sleeps the mice will play. But one day it has a good chance of happening to them. They may quite rightly believe they will never end up in a family court. Though it could only take a messy divorce. That person with the head in the sand, could have a breakdown, have a skiing accident, be a car crash or may just end up elderly with Alzeimers, Parkinsons or any other dementia. At some point in anyones life, you will spend a time of being vulnable So ok, lets look at the family courts again. Does anyone really want to ignor the problem, be sold on the idea that some people deserve to lose their children and by secret courts

2013 DEC 6 >> THE STATE is a THEFT INSTITUTION

2013 DEC 6 SELECT COMMITEE MEETING 3RD DEC

and the DENZIL SLUSH FUND co con spiritors

2013 DEC 5 ONE MILLION HITS IN 2 WEEKS

2013 DEC 5 BIRTH CERTIFICATE UNCOVERED
READ 4 pages about the real truth behind the birth certificate and how to escape Tyranny, Treason and corruption.

2013 DEC 4 LEE RIGBY TRIAL STATEMENT
READ Michael Adebolajo, reasoning and statement as to WHY? Adebolajo said he was ashamed to be called British because it was associated with the "murder, pillaging and rape of innocent people". Adebolajo told the detectives that British soldiers were being sent to "Muslim lands to commit mass murder". He said: "The reality of Muslim land, it's full of men who, like myself, are soldiers of Allah."
In an earlier interview, the murder suspect told officers the "leaders" of Britain were "wicked, corrupt, selfish and oppressive" and he was "particularly disgusted by David Cameron, the Miliband brothers and what's-his-name, Nick Clegg". He added that people do not realise the "wickedness and corruption" of former prime minister Tony Blair.
Occasionally revealing his face to the camera's view, Adebolajo said: "It's for those people who have not yet understood the nature, the nature of the war that's ongoing and has been on going for some many years between the Muslims and the British people." He went on: "The proof that this war between the people of Britain and the Muslims is that unfortunately it has to be interpreted in this way simply because your leaders, you have leaders who rule over you, unfortunately they rule over you in a very wicked, corrupt, selfish and oppressive manner." Adebolajo discussed politicians gathering in the House of Commons and paying tribute to soldiers killed in Afghanistan "as a disgusting practice".
He said Prime Minister Mr Cameron was "trying to emulate the footsteps of Tony Blair as if he worships him".
Well far be it from me to condone the death of Lee Rigby which I simply do not but the corruption felt by us at home in the UK definately ties in with what the man has said and alot of that makes sense to me. Perhaps this is the sort of justice that should be handed out to the politicians that have in reality caused Lee Rigbys death!!, but not to forget you can also add to it the root paymaster generals of the BANKERS & ultimately where it all leads back to, The root of all evil is politicians/money.

2013 DEC 4 PANNONEs BREACH OF SRA RULE 18
On the 11th October 2013 I wrote an email and a fax to PANNONEs to request their indemnity insurance details to which under SRA(solicitors regulatory authority) RULE 18 they have 7 days to respond and guess what no response! They have a duty to inform their insurance of 'any circumstance' that may lead to a claim! Today we will write to the SRA to make a formal complaint.

2013 DEC 4 MORE MEDIA INTEREST
More media interest taking place at this minute that hopefully will assist in exposing the CORRUPT BRITISH JUDICIARY whom are persecuting great grand mothers for cash, not to mention KIDS for CASH scandal!! Put that along with non UK visiting persons sedated to have her baby ripped from her womb where when she wakes its no where to be seen and is placed up for adoption!!! We are in a JUDICIAL crisis of TYRANICAL proportions that the UK is getting away with what they are doing!! READ MP John Hemmings blog

2013 DEC 3 The QUEEN IS NOT A VALID MONARCH
READ a defence of interest.
READ

[606083 hits]2013 DEC 3 SIR JAMES MUNBY INTERVENES
READ Top family judge orders social workers who insisted mother have caesarean... Explain why you snatched baby girl at birth Sir James Munby has demanded answers in extraordinary case The child was taken from the 35-year-old Italian in forced caesarean The case shines light on murky secrecy of Court of Protection Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2517144/Top-family-judge-orders-social-workers-insisted-mother-caesarean--Explain-snatched-baby-girl-birth.html#ixzz2mMpl3xwW Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

2013 DEC 2 The House of Lords Committee
READ about the meeting taking place tomorrow 3rd of December 2013. Having spent the past six months hearing evidence from those directly affected, their carers, doctors, lawyers, care homes, local authorities, regulators and the judiciary, among many others, the Committee will next week challenge Ministers on why widespread non-compliance is going apparently unchecked.
The Committee will ask what the Government is doing to achieve the ‘revolution in public attitudes and practice’ expected as a result of the Act; to fix the failure to apply safeguards to those who may be deprived of their liberty in care homes and hospitals; to improve professional practice, holding to account those who fail; and to ensure that the NHS responds effectively to the MCA and that the Court of Protection is fit for purpose.

2013 DEC 2 CIVIL COURT NO JURISDICTION
Without CONSENTwatch

& Laws Are Frauds? Paul Webster, Casino Money laundering?

2013 DEC 2 Woe unto yea LAWYERS (91 pages)
READ Woe unto yea LAWYERS. The legal trade, in short, is nothing but a high-class racket. The legal racket knows no political or social limitations. The common law is the set of rules that lawyers use to settle any dispute or problem to which no constitution or statute applies.

2013 DEC 2 A PROPERTY TRUST of FREEMAN CLAIMS
READ freeman of the land claims.

2013 DEC 1 PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS TO SNOWBALL
READ about Michael Doherty and his moves to bring private prosecutions against the police a huge step nearer. Two police officers have appeared in court accused of burglary, kidnap and false imprisonment after a judge granted the alleged victim the right to bring a rare private prosecution. Sergeant Gareth Blackburn, 38, and Detective Constable Stephen MacDonald, 42, were summonsed to appear before Westminster Magistrates Court to face a string of allegations related to an arrest they made on a man suspected of harassing a colleague in September 2008.

2013 DEC 1 DUTY OF CARE FAILURE/CORRUPT COLLUSION

SENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL LUSH - in holding the ultimate fudiciary responsibilty to demonstrate there being no fraud or breach of contract of the 1st general order where he stated; “The reasonable fees and expenses of a professional receiver are recoverable from the defendant in the personal injury action as a head of damage. They do not simply fall on the patient’s fund.” & for ignoring the doctors reports stating my mother had capacity from the beginning and then sending his own corrupt doctor whom did not conduct a clinical examination. Also for his collusion with the perpetrator of further crimes, his appointed deputy...

HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES and his failure to account as to what had happened to £1.1 million pounds inclusive of his breach of contract in the 1st general order stating; “the family should rest assured that my costs will not be eroding the capital settlement agreed for their mothers care and other specific needs.” & his 'fraud by false representation' when the patient emigrated outside the jurisdiction of England & Wales losing £100,000 of the client funds in exchange rate losses in a 'neglect of duty'.

MARTIN JOHN - the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian and his failure to provide a proper detailed investigation showing good reasons to show there was no theft fraud mal administration.

CHIEF CONSTABLE PETER FAHY for his failure to investigate a reported white collar crime of Theft Fraud and Mal administration and also provide a crime reference number on the 4 occasions it has been asked for. Further today 30/11/2013 Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy READ.

JUDGE PETER JACKSON for his failure to take account of the WILL he authorised mums capacity to make where he later then ring fenced her property so that she could not do with it as she pleased with her living will executor breaching the WILLS act.

JUDGE PELLING QC and so called "Nominated COURT OF PROTECTION Judge" whom conducted an administrative statute tribunal without the consent of all parties where he abandoned the court to have our representation thrown out by security after they claimed common law jurisdiction and requested a JURY after which he returned to hand down a 3 month prison sentence to the protected party/CARER of 17 years flying in the face of statute Mental Capacity ACt 2005 section 5 and thus the protection of carers from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a so called patient of the court of protection whom HOLDS CAPACITY! watch the video statement by my representation to a radio station of 7 minutes.

NOV 30 2013 HoLORDS Chairman letter to Yvonne Goder
READ how LORD HARDIE in the letter refuses to accept her serious submission of allegations of abuse of the Mental Capacity ACT because he says persons have been named!! One presumes we too will have the same letter at our home address. Peter Hofshroer wrote; So, er, if you go to the police and name people who have committed crimes against you, the police will not investigate, as you have named the people involved.
I see.
On 30.11.2013 12:00, Yvonne Goder wrote: > Hi all, > > Letter arrived today addressed to me by Lord Hardie, Chairman of the Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005. > > Although the letter plus envelope arrived very creased probably postmen's fault and despite the actual letter not on the usual House of Lords template or letterhead, why bother with me, I am just a victim! They did bother to write me the above letter and state that my submission was declined because of the accusations I made against named individuals. > > Regards, > > Yvonne

2013 NOV 30 60% of crimes NOT INVESTIGATED
READ Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy

NOV 29 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE INJUSTICE DESCRIBED

Jim Grant of Radio Lewes interviews Roger Hayes and describes how a Judge & court has ring fenced themselves in protection where there is a memorandum of agreement between the police and the courts. In this video Roger Hayes describes his appearance in my court case on the 14th January 2013 and where all our evidence and representation was thrown out & where JUDGE PELLING should be the one in prison. Published on 26 Jan 2013 (7 mins)
BEYOND THE NEWS 23rd January 2013 - Radio Lewes - In part one of this three part interview series Roger and Jim discuss the lack of due process of law, an update regards the developments since Rogers unlawful arrest and imprisonment in 2012, recent dealings in the High Court (Manchester) with other significant cases and the use of tactical methods, the power of the term - consent. Banks - RBS and its recently announced losses and the collapsing banking sector. The issuance of debt free money and more.

NOV 29 2013 AUDIT TRAIL REQUEST HOUSE OF LORDS
Dear Ms Brooke OF Clerk TO Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 House of Lords London SW1A 0PW, As you can see, I am on the cc list of this thread of e-mails. My submission to the enquiry provided evidence that indicated the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian. Martin John, was party to the systematic fraud of vulnerable people by corrupt police officers and social workers taking advantage of the non-existent checks and controls in implementation of the Mental Capacity Act. Baroness Barker indicated that the reason my submission had been deleted "not read" was that it had been determined that my submission was not relevant without having read it. Your statement appears to indicate that my submission, which was deleted "not read" was actually read. I do hope you appreciate these are conflicting statements, which would confuse any reasonable person. Can you please clarify what the situation is here, preferably by providing an audit trail of what happened to my submission? Thank you! Yours sincerely, Peter Hofschröer

NOV 28 2013 £2 million FRAUD & GUILTY PLEA
READ how Much of the money was taken from living clients but some was also taken from the estates of dead people - including one who suffered as a World War Two prisoner of war. THE IRONY IS, IS THAT THIS IS NOT AN ISOLATED CASE... IT IS WIDESPREAD!

NOV 27 2013 JUDGE DEMANDS they OPEN to SCRUTINY
READ

NOV 26 2013 SUBMISSIONS NOT DELETED
Subject: RE: Lords Committee. Letters of Evidence awaiting Acknowledgment Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:47:27 +0000
Dear Mr Lawrence
I can confirm that no submissions to the Select Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 have been deleted. All submissions have been passed to the Chairman of the Committee. The Committee intends to publish submissions accepted as evidence before Christmas. A full report will be published in March 2014.
Kind regards
Judith Brooke Clerk Committee on the Mental Capacity Act 2005 House of Lords London SW1A 0PW

NOV 22 2013 UNIVERSAL NATURAL LAW in ACTION

we support such action to the hilt in view of overwhelming corporate government and judicial corruption.

NOV 22 2013 LISTEN TO MATT DAMEN.. shocking
You Think You Know Someone, and Then He Gets on a Stage and Blows Your Mind

Matt Damon isn’t asking you to start a revolution, but when you hear this, you might anyway. If you don’t love what you’re hearing after the first 29 seconds, jump to 3:45 for a nugget of truth that every American can stand behind. MUST LISTEN TO THIS ONE http://vimeo.com/48834336 MUST LISTEN

NOV 22 2013 HOUSE OF LORDS CORRESPONDENCE
BARONESS BARKER Yesterday On 21.11.2013 20:18, BARKER, Baroness wrote:
Submissions to the review are dealt with by the clerks, not members of the committee.
After receiving an email from the House of Lords Committee on Mental Capacity Act review to say to Peter Hofshroer that his email of submission was not read and was deleted he wrote back to ask, Can you please explain on whose authorisation the clerks have permission to delete evidence submitted without reading it?
On 21.11.2013 20:18, BARKER, Baroness wrote:
Submissions to the review are dealt with by the clerks, not members of the committee.
LEN LAWRENCE then wrote back....to Baroness Barker, of
House of Lords Committee on the review of the Mental Capacity Act
Submissions to the review are dealt with by the clerks, not members of the committee.
Are the clerks selective in the sourcing of data that they make available to members of the committee ?
I was advised that my submission was to sensitive to be heard in public, and would have to be in a closed room.
I am still available to appear before the committee, unlike Peter, Norman, Mike who have found it necessary to leave United Kingdom as a result of the abuse of psychiatry by some members of the legal profession against them. Also for those like Maggie and Yvonne who have gagging orders against them, I am also happy to speak for them as well.
The video below to Sir James Munby may be of interest
www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8Id55cRQMs

NOV 20 2013 LORDS DEBATE MENTAL CAPACITY

NOV 19 2013 HUMAN v LEGAL FICTION
John Brookes November 4 2013 I went to court this morning. And I followed what I believed to be a lawful right. I made a statement that would enter the court room if my God given inalienable human rights were intact and that I would enter the room if they accept that I am claiming common law jurisdiction. They all agreed. I asked to establish if the judges one man and 2 women were acting on their oath. They did not respond I then told them that I was the lay advisor representing the person summoned to the court and the person Mr John C BROOKES, is present in the court room. Again I asked if they were on their oath, again they did not respond I presented to the court the legal fiction (birth certificate) when the clerk asked for Mr John C Brookes. I did not accept that I was Mr John C BROOKES. I asked again and 3 times if they were acting under their oaths.. The judges called for security . then I called the police.. The judges left the court room.. The security 4 of them entered the court tell me to leave the court, and I told them that I would not leave and that I was there under common jurisdiction.. At that point all four of them grabbed me lifted me up and carried out of the room down the stairs and dumped me outside the court. The police came, I explained what happened. One of them went to the judges and came back with a typed order no signature.. and I was taken to Bloxwich police station. And arrested for failing to appear under bail orders.. Later I was taken back to court.. and was bailed to appear on the 13 February 2014. I have just got home about 40 mins ago. Shaking and upset.. I wish there had been someone to witness these events .

NOV 19 2013 ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS UNLAWFUL
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful. The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation. The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts. In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes. Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers. The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.

NOV 18 2013 THE STATE OF OUR COURTS

NOV 16 2013 LEN LAWRENCE EXPOSING COP FRAUD
Leonard Lawrence Pilot.

NOV 13 2013 MAFIA RUN BRITAIN-JOHN MAJOR
READ

This is the one from the Mirror yesterday Michael!
By James Lyons
John Major blasts the “truly shocking” grip a privately educated elite has over Britain 12 Nov 2013 21:49 The former Conservative Prime Minister's comments have been seen as a swipe at Old Etonian David Cameron and his well-heeled Cabinet Shocked: Sir John Major Shocked: Sir John Major Getty
Sir John Major has condemned the “truly shocking” grip that a privately educated elite has over Britain. The ex-Prime Minister’s blast has been seen as a swipe at Old Etonian David Cameron and his well-heeled Cabinet. Tory grandee Sir John, who grew up in a rented flat in Brixton, South London, and attended a state school, said: “In every single sphere of British influence, the upper echelons of power in 2013 are held overwhelmingly by the privately educated or the affluent middle class.” He went on: “To me, from my background, I find that truly shocking.” More than half of the Cabinet, including Chancellor George Osborne and Deputy PM Nick Clegg, went to exclusive, fee-paying schools.
Sir John, 70, left school aged 16 in 1959 with three O-levels. He went on to gain three more by correspondence course before embarking on a career in banking then politics. David Cameron Old Etonian: David Cameron Getty Lib Dem Treasury minister Danny Alexander, who is Mr Osborne’s deputy and Mr Clegg’s closest ally, backed Sir John.
Writing on Twitter, Mr Alexander, who went to a comprehensive school, said: “Agree with #Major that corridors of power should reflect society.”
Shadow Schools minister Kevin Brennan said the Tory-led Government was consigning young people to the scrapheap instead of helping them. He said: “John Major is telling people what they already knew: David Cameron’s is an out-of-touch government that is staggeringly complacent on the one million unemployed young people.
"The next generation are being locked out of opportunity, blighted by Cameron’s cost of living crisis.” No10 tried to brush off Sir John’s stinging broadside.
Mr Cameron’s spokesman said: “As the Prime Minister said, what counts is not where you come from, it is where you are going.” Sir John, who made his remarks at a Tory constituency dinner, blamed the Labour Party for the “collapse in social mobility”. He previously embarrassed the PM by accusing him of forgetting the poor.

NOV 9 2013 THE MONARCH AND THE MAGNA CARTA 1215
There is a family upon our island who are so incredibly wealthy that it is impossible to quantify their wealth. You can't measure it terms of money in bank accounts, shareholdings in companies, treasures locked away in vaults or luxury palaces. They have all these things, and more, they have land too, but these things are not their wealth, they are mere tools they posses for the purpose of maintaining and guarding their true wealth.
Legions of men and women wearing costumes surround this family, guarding them and their tools day and night, endlessly gathering more of the same inwards like an earthly black hole gobbling whole stars and planets as it's mass increases ever more with each new acquisition of physical matter.
We all know this family, we have always known them, their presence is ubiquitous, I need not name from, their is only so much space left over in a living room that has an elephant within it, that you would have to be deaf, dumb, blind and paralysed not to of noticed it there and identified exactly the family I am referring to from the description above.
Almost 800 years ago the current incarnation of this behemoth this earthly black hole, was forced against his will, without his freely given consent, to enter into a contract with the people, a contract which states that it is binding for all time, and that his heirs and successors shall forever more hold the tangential infinity of wealth that those who came before him had gathered for themselves, upon certain conditions.
The conditions were many, some important, others less so, but among them was article 61, also know as the enforcement clause. All contracts have clauses, binding agreements of what shall be done, by the parties to the contract in the event that the contract is broken, and this contract was no different.
I'm referring of course to the Magna Carta, the foundational document of the British Constitution. It was the beginning which paved the way for everything which was to come after it, the contract between the People and King John at Runnymede, in the year 1215.
I've seen a video of our current Prime Minister Mr David Cameron, openly state that we have no written constitution, and yet at the same time, the direct descendant of King John Queen Elizabeth II, a heir and successor whose claim to the wealth of her ancestors is guaranteed by the people in accordance with the contract the people put before John, openly claims herself to be the Constitutional Monarch of a Constitutional Monarchy.
These two claims are diametrically opposed, the Queen cannot be a Constitutional Monarch, if there is no written constitution.
It is said by some that the Magna Carta is null and void, that since John did not give his consent to the contract, and since he was acting under duress, his later act of reneging on the contract was perfectly legitimate.
Certainly it would seem people like Mr Cameron prefer this interpretation of the facts, for without a written constitution there is no constitutional law to bind his actions, and no constitutional law for the people to defend their rights and freedoms in the courts against those actions.
The Magna Carta states that once the judgement of necessity has been made by the quorum of barons, as happened in 2001, the people may rise up and wage war upon the Sovereign until they have redress and until their rights and freedoms under the constitution have been restored and the Sovereign or the Sovereign's agents (aka the government) is once again bound to obey the law and to uphold the constitutional rights of the people in the courts.
The Magna Carta also states that the person of the Sovereign shall be held safe from harm whilst the people attain their rightfully owed redress as per the contract.
But what if this contract is indeed null and void? In that case all bets are off, there is no Magna Carta and there is no law, there was no reason for the people to wait for the decision of the barons to rise up, for there is no contract in place which either allows or forbids any such action.
In such an eventuality the safety of the person of the Sovereign is not guaranteed by honourable contract with the people, but only with whatever weapons the Sovereign's agents might be foolish enough to try using upon the people in attempt to safeguard it.
I've heard speak of a new Carter being drawn up, the Magna Carta 2015, 800 years since the first, a new offering of peace from the people. A new deal, a new contract which will be presented to the Sovereign to sign.
Will consent be given this time? Or are we going to go around this 800 year long merry go round of bloodshed and misery once again? This is the first time in history that modern man has faced this challenge. We may think we are smart with our internet and space shuttles, but have we learned anything yet?
I mentioned previously that Albert Burgess holds that Monarchs of the British People are elected, and I spoke about how I see just such an election taking place as various characters openly speak of treason, both their own and that of high officials in government.
It cannot be treason for me to suggest that the rightful Sovereign is the individual who would willingly consent to the second version of the Magna Carta, because if the original stands then the action of making the suggestion is authorised by the judgement of the Barons, and if the Magna Carta is null and void then there is no contract binding me or anyone else from speaking such words in the first place.
So now after 12 years of searching the participants of the Lawful Rebellion finally have a concrete plan for a solution. It has been a hard long struggle, and it's not over yet. The matter can be settled and resolved once and for all with the simple consent of the Sovereign to a new Magna Carta contract with the people, and if the Sovereign should refuse to the agreement then we have every right no matter how the matter is sliced, to go ahead and find a new Sovereign who can see their way clearly to doing what is right and signing on that dotted line, instantly restoring the rule of law and the constitutional protections it provides.
And that infinite wealth I mentioned at the start? It's name is freedom, it is the recognised right for an individual to either consent to or refuse any and all contracts placed before them, it is the fundamental principle of all law, and that right, is absolutely priceless. Castles crumble, gold can be melted down and used for electronic circuit boards, and people in costumes take them off the moment they are no longer being paid to wear them. But fully functioning and absolutely upheld constitutional rights and freedoms can not be bought at any price, they can only be agreed upon, consented to and then acknowledged as being good, right and true henceforth.
Chris Newsham I think the royal family do a great job and should be admired and respected
20 hours ago · Like · 2 ..
Michael Clarke... Chris its all about our constitution and whether you believe we have one because the corrupt bastards of UK government backed by a treasonous JUDICIAL system is claiming the Magna Carta 1215 is NULL & VOID which if that is the case affects the monarchy!# br> Michael Clarke.... You cannot claim Chris on the one hand that... here is your constitutional MONARCH.. Queen Elizabeth 11 and then on the other hand Chris.. state .. Oh & by the way we have no Constitution??? HELLO!!! are you getting the picture Chris.. I am not having a personal go at HRH but the monarchy is built around our constitutional rights that have been treasonously removed by a bent government and a bent judiciary which is at the heart of the reason CHRIS why I and my mother are suffering in exile from a politically corrupt bent judicial system born out of FINANCIAL GREED for the ELITE making in effect CHRIS, you, me and my mother, all SLAVES to their own ends. No disrespect but until pure corruption touches yourself YOU like others need to wake up to what is happening around you!
You Chris have displayed the symbol, a POPPY all in the memory of those whom lost their lives to keep us free, but, you do not realise what is currently happening where our soldiers are being used to fights wars that don't exist, that are being made up for financial greed by the ELITE. The bankers are running the show Chris! They are the ones sending innocent lives into battle to protect and fill their own pockets! I placed on here a week ago a picture, a diagram of the BANKERS international aims and which countries were the ones without their financial controls.. there were 8 countries in the year 2000 now there are 4. These so called wars Chris where we are losing soldiers lives are all about money! MONEY the root of all EVIL. THEY certainly are not about FREEDOM!
Gordon Denton you are totally correct mike in recorded meeting yesterday i had inspector from blackpool police here saying the police can do what they want they need no reason to stop you in a car and said acts of parliment is law which i said no they require consent and he said dont understand then in went on to say they dont require consent i asked him to put this in writing which he ignored and i said again are we policed by consent and do acts of parliment require consent which he said im not going to answer the question the police and government are all corrupt and liars
Michael Clarke YES Gordon... Of course they are... I don't need any more convincing after the research I have seen.. its now very clear where the overall agenda is... it really is shameful that our once proud nation is being taken for ride by bankers, where tyranny and evil are showing its face... there is obviously going to have to be blood shed in the UK before JUSTICE again will prevail because these bastards are only going to understand force! It's only the force and coercion anyway that they have been using on us now for some years... SAD really, but unless something is done Gordon its the children whom are going to suffer, growing up into a NEW, ONE world order of TYRANNY dictatorship!
Gordon Denton I know they are I didnt need him to answer yes was just interesting what lies was coming out of the man in costume and an inspector at that. We do all need to wake up some people are happy been slaves of the government and bullied by police
Michael Clarke Its time to start dealing with the bullies.... I just need a fake passport to re enter the country and form an armed revolution probably with RUSSELL BRAND I think, yes he would be a good choice because he makes me laugh, and when the chips are down you need a good laugh.

NOV 5 2013 FREEMASONS DEFENCE
READ our defence.

NOV 2 2013 SAYS IT ALL

NOV 1 2013 PRISON FOR PENSIONERS
READ about more corrupt prison sentences for pensioners by single judge without a fair trial.

OCT 27 2013 CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED

OCT 27 2013 MASONIC OATH OF CORRUPT DECEIT
Could you trust any public official who has taken this oath to 'Hele, hide & conceal' note hele also means: hide and conceal

READ about the word 'hele'.

OCT 26 2013 NONE OF THE ABOVE PARTY

Russell Brand makes valid comment on our political disgrace.

OCT 26 2013 MORE TALK OF REVOLUTION

OCT 25 2013 TRIAL BY JUDGE IS TREASON

A PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION OUTSIDE THE ROYAL COURTS OF SO CALLED JUSTICE THIS MONTH OCTOBER 2013
READ Patricks Blog.
READ a letter to corruption champion Kenneth Clarke MP

OCT 22 2013 INTEGRITY NON NEGOTIABLE

WHEN THOSE WHO UPHOLD THE LAW BREAK THE LAW IN THE NAME OF THE LAW THERE IS NO LAW.

OCT 19 2013 ONE MORE STEP FOR PRIVATE JUSTICE
READ about friend Michael Doherty and co campaigner for justice, whom I met at the British Consitution group meetings, and his battle to bring private prosecutions has moved a huge step forward.

OCT 18 2013 HERE COMES REVOLT TO THE SYSTEM
JOIN UK Civil disobedience MARCH 5th November 2013. THE revolution is starting.

OCT 14 2013 FREEMASON CORRUPTION UNCOVERED
READ about more freemason corruption via HILLSBOROUGH investigation coverups. The Independent Police Complaints Commission took the unusual move after families of the football fans who died in the disaster demanded that no members of a lodge be involved.

OCT 13 2013 FACEBOOK BOOTS ON THE GROUND CALL
Michael Doherty
People it's time for BOOTS ON THE GROUND
- we see time and time again utter ingrained corruption in every organisation of government.
Corruption that they allow to continue to PERSECUTE individuals, to PERSECUTE families, to PERSECUTE communities. Time to stand up, and put into action all you have learn't through independent self study and information you have gained via these social networks. This is REAL, the system you placed your faith and trust in has betrayed you, time to take back the power you invested in that broken system.
BOOTS ON THE GROUND, ACTION IN EVERY MOVE YOU MAKE
Michael Doherty Have you seen enough? paedophiles protected, workers blacklisted, massive coverup of deaths at hands of the police, Hillsborough, Daniel Morgan, Charles DeMenezes, Ian Tomlinson, Hacking scandals, bank bail outs with public money, zero tax for corporations, Lynette White scandal, unlawful wars, bankers bonus', PPI scandals, pension robberies, attacks on the disabled, ATOS, energy price fixing, council taxes, massive scale of home repossessions, finger printing your kids in schools, privacy invasions - ANPR, CCTV
The lists go on and on and on, you and your very way of life is under attack, it's time to defend your rights, it's time to say enough is enough
Michael Doherty
"INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE"
Look around you people, look at the mass of injustice served up daily to your screens. Injustice that touches each and everyone of you, brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, neighbours and strangers.
It is damaging society and blighting lives and futures....

OCT 11 2013 FAXED NOTICE TO PANNONE
FAO Melanie McGuirk
Ref COMMERCIAL LIEN CLAIM of £9 million
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
I write with reference to the perfected claim under common law that I hold against you & YOUR COMPANY.
You are now no doubt aware that I have no intention of taking the route of PURGE a contempt that never existed in the first place.
Under the terms of your insurance it is understood that you are required to notify the insurance of any such 'circumstance' that surrounds any such claim against you and I believe you have not informed your insurance accordingly.
It is also understood that the terms of your policy require that on request details of your insurers will be provided, and I hereby request the details of your insurers to be provided BY RETURN EMAIL within the next 7 days.
It is believed that if you have failed to inform your insurance of any circumstance leading to a claim against you, that, you are in breach of the terms of your indemnity on any such policy, and therefore, operating your business whilst uninsured.
You are aware of the statutory declarations made to the courts showing lawful proof of VOID ORDERS in the use of statute courts and their failure to provide under common law requests, JURY COURTS, leaving their judgements without jurisdiction & therefore VOID.
I am open to negotiate a resolution to rescind the LIEN against you. I require financial compensation and an application to recind the committal against the LEGAL FICTION, MICHAEL CLARKE.
You are aware of my legal fictions effective imprisonment albeit in a foreign country without freedom of movement due to an unlawful committal order and as such, without movement to act to resolve these matters, I intend to file upon all named in the first LIEN, a further monthly LIEN of £1 million pounds per person.
We are looking into the case that the Judge, Pelling, is also not indemnified which will also open him up for a personal claim... which we have established within an additional claim against him. READ

OCT 1 2013 WARNING TO GOVERNMENT by SOVEREIGNS
READ the warning to government that, we are the people and we are sovereign. These are the views spreading amongst so called fringe groups that are growing fast outside of the word 'fringe' the reality being that a revolution is underway.>

Oct 1 2013 CROSS SECTION OF EMAIL COMPLAINTS
READ a cross section of emails showing how the Court of Corruption is ruining thousands of lives.

Sept 28 2013 PARTY IN THE STREET FOR MUM

Sept 25 2013 FALLING MASONRY of CORRUPT DECEIT
READ the Shining light on the Corruption and Deceit of the Freemasons where the JUDGES all participate where the No 1 sworn allegience is to each other of the BRETHREN and this is where the BIAS in court starts i.e., JUDGE PETER JACKSON speaks with PANNONE and there we have the BIAS, a handshake, a nudge and a wink, not to mention brown envelopes! WHERE is one might ask the IMPARTIALITY and FAIRNESS, it's only in a JURY court of your peers, these perverts of JUSTICE are raping us. READ VOMIT, which was a monthly newsletter issued by someone called James M. Todd, between 1998 and 2003. This circular highlighted a multitude of cases where Freemasons and associated bodies had abused power and authority for their own ends. After publication of this bulletin ceased suddenly, it seems to have mostly disappeared from the Internet, and many issues have since become difficult to find. So, we are therefore making an archive of back issues of this publication available to the public. None of the content has been edited or censored, and whilst the original formatting and layout leaves much to be desired, only adverts and broken links have been removed (if there are still some left, please excuse them). n.b. Many issues contain strong language, as well as views that are not necessarily those held by Falling Masonry. However, we believe that this is a useful resource for identifying turn-of-the-Millennium Masons, and bringing their institutionalized corruption, crime and maladministration to the public's attention.
3 words that go hand in glove
FREEMASONS - ILLUMINATI - BILDERBERGERS
THEY ARE THE ANTICHRIST!
BILDERBERGERS MEET

Sept 25 2013 LAND REGISTRY FRAUD EXPERT
READ a reply today from a LAND REGISTRY EXPERT ON FRAUD.... where the facts are quite alarming!!!

Sept 23 2013 FAO Judge Jackson
Dear Judge Jackson
Ref link below or attached opg.me/LandRegisterLA826609_mergedwithWILLpluscourtorder.pdf
Your order seems to conflict with the statutory wills act? Does this mean that the irregularity of the hearing means the order made is VOID??
It would appear that the court of protection is ring fencing the property?? Ignoring the THE LIVING Will that was sent to you?? Judge JACKSON REPY....
Dear Mr Clarke,
The judge has made his order. The matter is no longer before him and he is unable to enter into correspondence.
Regards,

Sept 23 2013 COURT RING FENCES PROPERTY
READ WILL merged with land registry and COURT ORDER. You will see where in the WILL the court really had no further authority to encompass my mothers house, effectively ringfencing it in a court of protection order overiding statutory wills act and the authority of the LIVING WILL EXECUTOR in which this particular Judge was fully aware of the said WILL and whom authorised my mothers capacity to make it.

Sept 23 2013 REPORTING FRAUD to LAND REGISTRY
Dear Sir
land registry details http://opg.me/LandRegisterLA826609.pdf
living will executor http://www.opposepredatoryguardians.com/will20082012.pdf
I am the LIVING WILL executor if any public authority claims my mother is incapacitated.
The court is aware of this and therefore the restriction place upon my mother s property is illegal and unlawful.
Please remove it.

Sept 23 2013 More representation denied
Good morning
Thank you for your email.
Unfortunately this is not a case that Slater & Gordon Lawyers are able to deal with at the present time. By way of general advice however, it may be worth contacting the Law Society (on 020 7242 1222) or Find-a-Lawyer (on 0800 606 6575) or www.solicitors-online.com) for details of specialists in your local area.
Yours sincerel Enquiries Team Slater & Gordon (UK) LLP

Sept 23 2013 LAND REGISTRY DOCUMENT
READ Land registry restrictions on my mothers property by PANNONE LLP after knowing I am the EXECUTOR in her LIVING WILL should further incapacity be claimed. This restriction is UNLAWFUL.

Sept 23 2013 HOW TO SURVIVE WHILST ON THE RUN
... when arrived at your destination pot less, sell you only transport/car to gain the money for a deposit and advance rent..... settle down and breath for a while... establish the facts.. ie your not extraditable... get a job.... open a bank account.... get onto the system for health purposes... pay tax!... ALL THE ABOVE BOXES TCIKED there is now no need to make a statement of lies in an apology of 'purge the contempt' that never existed in the first place!! NOW HAVING RETREATED, REGROUPED AND BREATHING WE WILL GO BACK AGAIN ON A NEW FRONTAL ATTACK..... watch this space...

Sept 21 2013 RELATIVELY HONEST POLICE FORCE

Sept 18 2013 DOCUMENT LEGALISING TO EUROPEAN STANDARD
Whilst gaining 2 contracts of work for me and my partner, in Spain we are actively now persueing legalising our documents to the EUROPEAN standard of the Hague Convention, that the British Courts will no longer be able to ignore, as they have up to now and will soon be released back into the British Courts for them to accept without rejection having been EU legalised!

Sept 15 2013 PARLIAMENT GATEKEEPER
JOHN HEMMING MP runs with the hare, whilst hunting with the hounds read here in a succession of recent exchange emails where he sees the only option is to purge your contempt in statement of lies that any other route will not work and the reason being, as he openly admits, is a corrupt broken faulty system.

Sept 12 2013 NEW RULES OVER JUDGES
READ about newer and stricter and faster rules on complaints about Judges.

Sept 6 2013 JUDGE declares acceptance of INTERNET ERA
READ Judge calls for more transparency in family courts The most senior family judge in England and Wales has demanded more transparency in the courts after rejecting social workers’ attempts to silence a father whose baby was taken into care against his will. Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the public had a right to know “what is being done in their name” and called for the courts to adapt to the internet era

SEPT 4 2013 LSC & PHSO DEBATE

READ As you can see, Mr. McCabe raises issues about various bodies that most of you have had problems with, including the PHSO. You have ALL had problems with lawyers and judges. Here is your chance to enlighten Mr. McCabe a bit more about the full extent of the problem. He may just raise the points in parliament, so please don’t waste this opportunity. Once a point has been raised in parliament, we have some very powerful ammunition for lobbying, as we have it in writing.

A PERSON IS NOT A HUMAN BEING

AUG 27 2013 KIDS FOR CASH SCANDAL
READ about how Judges and lawyers will go to jail if a new Police Commissioner has his way. David Gale, UKIP’s candidate to become Derbyshire’s first Police and Crime Commissioner, is setting out his stall to tackle what he says is corruption and criminality within the family justice system. Accusing judges and lawyers of routine involvement in perverting the course of justice, Gale says that where parents are encouraged to fabricate allegations and the court turns a blind-eye, there must be a formal criminal investigation. Gale, who led a ground-breaking project to enable information sharing across agencies to protect vulnerable children, claims to have inside information: “I am shocked that professionals dealing with children are hushing up the wholesale abuse of the family justice system.” Gale said, “I’ve received detailed accounts from professionals and parents both in Derby and further afield that large parts of the family justice system are being run like an organised crime racket. There is an epidemic of mothers being advised by their lawyers that if they make false statements against partners attesting to domestic violence they will be fast-tracked to legal aid, will be able to testify unopposed to gain a Non-Molestation Order, and will not be held to account even if their perjury is uncovered. Women are being advised of this legal mechanism as a means of severing the relationship between a father and his children.” “Judges are routinely turning a blind-eye to uncorroborated, fabricated witness statements made by women seeking to abuse the legal process. The family law industry’s lawyers are milking this for all it’s worth, with judges in some cases allocating completely unnecessary court hearings that ramp up costs, acting like brokers in an insidiously corrupt scam that defrauds the public purse.” Gale continued, “I will make it clear that the current response from police when presented with evidence of perjury ‘that it is a court matter’ will not wash. If evidence of a criminal offence committed within civil proceedings is presented to Derbyshire Constabulary officers, they will investigate it thoroughly. Those guilty of perjury should expect to go to jail, along with lawyers or judges who have participated in perverting the course of justice. It’s been eighteen months since Christopher Booker exposed the reality of the family justice system, citing it as “callous, corrupt and staggeringly expensive”. I see no evidence to suggest that the problems are isolated to just Children’s Services.” “Increasingly, we’re seeing adolescent boys being left fatherless with positive male role-models being replaced in some cases by gang culture. There is a significant on-going cost to the public purse that continues long after unscrupulous legal professionals have dipped their snouts into the legal aid trough.” “It isn’t the politically correct thing to do to identify women as potentially being the instigators of an abuse of domestic violence legislation but telling it like it is is not about being part of a popularity contest. I will have an amnesty for those women who come forward to testify on their lawyers’ illegal advice but I have a duty to the people of Derbyshire to root out this institutionalised corruption once and for all.”

AUG 27 2013 GOVERNMENT
“To be GOVERNED is to be watched, inspected, spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered, regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, checked, estimated, valued, censured, commanded, by creatures who have neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue to do so. To be GOVERNED is to be at every operation, at every transaction noted, registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be place under contribution, drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized, extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified, harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed, disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, derided, outraged, dishonored. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality."
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, 1851
Written in 1851 ... and absolutely NOTHING has changed.

AUG 26 2013 COMMERCIAL LIENS NEW YORK TIMES
READ the New York times about the paper war on corruption & the flood of commercial liens being used on properties to secure against debts. Exactly what I was trying to achieve with Pannones Properties. If it works in that common law country what is wrong with our common law country? Still to this day niether PANNONES or HUGH JONES have answered the allegations contained in the commercial lien served upon them, allegations that were sworn on oath remember, before a notary, serious fraudulent allegations - so why will they not do something about that regarding libel. Is it not a fact that I am telling the truth and that the authorities do not want to deal with the frauds because there is a cover up of racketeering fraud going on nationally backed by the government. The best shot they could fire was to turn to fraud once again and manipulate the harassment act and make their in-the-pocket judge an accessary in collusion to try and stop this publication and the shear exposure of corruption.

AUG 25 2013
WATCH Mel a lady from OLDHAM whom has degrees in legalese and that it's all rubbish LEGAL is not LAWFUL and LAWFUL is superior.

AUG 23 2013
READ about Supreme Court Validates People's Rights to Establish Common Law Grand Jury. This is already underway in Britain... I have seen the pictures... this is where we the people will start to gain our common law justice back once and for all. The “Powers That Be” are now the “Powers That Were”. READ the opposition to secret courts is gathering pace.

AUG 23 2013 FAMILIES DESTROYED BY CORRUPTION A MUST READ with lots of information about how families are being destroyed by UK state corruption. READ about the Dual system of Justice, a rule for them and a rule for us??

AUG 18 2013 FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS OSBORNE VETO
READ about George Osborne having a veto on what frauds get investigated that might be damaging to government?? This does look like the reason why we cannot get any justice? Private Prosecutions are probably the only way. CONFLICT OF INTEREST MAYBE??

AUG 17 2013 BACKGROUND CHANGE TO PINK
I am being advised that my aggression is exuding itself from the website and that I have to play the game to try and win the support of middle England. The trouble is my game is not courts on a scale of grand theft and fraud, my game is pubs clubs and leisure. As for the word, "game" I object to the government and the judiciary playing games with me and my mother whom has been through enough in her life. To commit theft fraud and neglect on me I might be able to play a few games, but, my mother is a different story, like anyone else's mother. Would you put up with that sort of pain infliction upon your mother without a little aggression coming out. In an effort to portray a better picture I stand corrected and will try and curtail the anger felt inside. Changed back to keywords background after 4 days as I believe the story should be told how it really is in it's keywords.

AUG 17 2013 3rd ALLEGATION OF FRAUD TO POLICE
READ a follow up email of complaint at the lack of action from the Police to follow up on FRAUD.

AUG 17 2013 READ A RULE OF LAW ARTICLE

AUG 17 2013 OUR SUBMISSION TO THE HOUSE OF LORDS
READ our submission to the House of Lords Mental Capacity Act Committee.

AUG 16 2013 HOUSE OF LORDS SUBMISSION fellow victim
READ a submission to the house of lords mental capacity act committee from Yvonne Goder.

AUG 15 2013
READ about The Bill of Rights and article V.
A petition to the Monarch is protected under Article V of the 1688 Bill of Rights.
and Article V states:
Right to petition.
That it is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall.
This is also referred to in the first amendment of the US Constitition which states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. It is in fact Article V that means that some court orders do not have a valid jurisdiction (such as court orders that prevent people complaining about crimes - one further one of which was referred to me this week, and those which purport to prevent people talking to MPs or appealing decisions.). In fact that is the basis upon which Wanda Maddocks should win her appeal on imprisonment once it goes in.
In any event a short summary of Mike Clarke's case is that it started with him complaining that the charges made by a solicitor for his mothers' issues and ended up with him being given a 3 month prison sentence in absentia. He is caring for his mother in exile in Spain and cannot return to the UK. Contempt of Court is not a criminal issue and hence he cannot be extradited.

AUG 10 2013 VIDEO PETITION TO THE QUEEN

AUG 9 2013 VIDEO PETITION TO THE QUEEN coming soon
On mother's happy 73rd birthday today she makes a video petition to the Queen, to be released shortly.

Mothers favourite dish at 73 taken today.

AUG 8 2013 2ND REPORT TO POLICE OF FRAUD
2nd POLICE report about FRAUD. Copied to 83 other agencies.

AUG 7 2013 JOHN HEMMING QUESTION
Dear John I QUESTIONED YOUR STATEMENT THAT MAGNA CARTA WAS A STATUTE AND GOT THIS REPLY NOW OBVIOUSLY AS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE TREATY OF 1215 CAN YOU PROVIDE ME WITH AN ANSWER TO THAT WRITTEN BELOW?
There have been many so-called Magna Cartas.
The first one, and only one that has any validity, was NOT a Statute but a Treaty. It was made on June 15th 1215, at Runnymede, between the Barons & King John. It said, very plainly, that (a) It lasted ‘for ever’ and (b) Anything attempting to supersede was always null & void. Being a TREATY, and not a STATUTE, it could not be ‘repealed’.
The first Parliament didn’t come into existence until 1295 – some 80 YEARS later – thus the Magna Carta 1215 couldn’t have been a Statute enacted by any Parliament. But - as has been said – there have been many attempts to create ‘subsequent’ Magna Cartas. In 1216, in 1225 and in 1297 (the last being the Magna Carta Statute … to which John Hemming is referring). As has been said, above, ALL of these subsequent ‘attempts’ were immediately null & void … by virtue of the TREATY of 1215. That’s why one ALWAYS refers to The Magna Carta 1215” and NOT to simply “The Magna Carta” … the latter allowing those who are ignorant of history to dismiss “The Magna Carta” as ‘a Statute that has been repealed’.
The FACTS are: 1. The TREATY of 1215 ‘repealed’ every attempt - that followed - as null & void anyway.
2. The TREATY of 1215 stands as a backstop to EVERYTHING … INCLUDING the creation of Parliament in 1295 - which was (therefore) created UNDER … and is ALWAYS subservient to – The Magna Carta 1215
3. The TREATY of 1215 is quoted – by Halbury’s Laws of England – as “the founding document of the British Constitution”. Like most Politicians, John Hemming has (therefore) no real knowledge of the British Constitution (as evidenced by his remarks). And therefore no REAL knowledge of this REAL job, and REAL status. There are iron cast arguments, based on logic & reason, that no Parliament has (or could have had) any validity whatsoever … let alone any claim to be ‘sovereign’.
4. Halsbury’s DOES NOT refer – in any way – to the look-alikes that followed … for the reasons (one assumes) given above.
5. For John Hemming’s view to be correct, the year 1297 needs to have come BEFORE the year 1215.
6. The Common Law has been existence since the dawn of man, because it is nothing more than ‘the common sense of man, creating law – for each circumstance - via a jury of 12 people using their innate common sense’.
7. It’s always worth asking “If Politicians & Judges can make Law … then why do we go to the enormous expense of Juries?” Not knowing these fundamentals, and not having them one’s fingertips, will lead someone into serious trouble.

AUG 7 2013 ADMIRALTY & COMMERCIAL COURT GUIDE
READ it. Plus HIGH TREASON According to the old laws of England which are still in force, many current Britishpoliticians qualify for hanging and their laws are null and void. READ

AUG 7 2013 MP email exchange
READ an exchange of emails & about ANOTHER IN EXILE WITH HIS MOTHER & his FILE Mike, Thanks for your help.
You ask the pertinent question: "WHERE DOES ONE GO FOR REDRESS??"
The answer to that question is very simple: As you will not get redress in the once proud country of Britain, then, as our cases show, you have to flee the country for your life and liberty.
Mum survived the Blitz in London. If we returned to Britain, she would be put on the "care pathway" within minutes and not survive that. I would be arrested on the border, although the police admit there is no evidence of me committing any offence. However, I know too much about the endemic official corruption, so I need to be shut up. I'm a bit too young for the "care pathway", so it is a nut-house for me.
So here we are, living safely in Hitler's homeland, because an 84 year-old, disabled British war veteran cannot possibly live in her own house in Britain so long as police officers and social workers are at large.
That is life in Brave New Britain.
If you are young and vulnerable, the state will kidnap you and sell your body - in every conceivable way you can imagine, and others you probably can't. If you are old and vulnerable, the state will kidnap you and put you in a death camp, while plundering your assets and using them to offset the national debt.
Mum, 84 years-old and wheelchair-bound is one of the very few victims lucky enough to have a son with sufficient strength of character and good enough connections to fight this evil. 99% of the victims are defenceless. That is why the state targets them:
Diddle kiddies for the fun of it, bump them off, earn dosh from the snuff movie and sell of their organs to a harvester. That is good business. Note that childrens homes in Britain are about to be privatised. Good business, eh?
Target isolated old people, have the Court of Protection declare them incapacitated. Seize their assets. Stick them in a home. Don't give them anything to eat or drink. How can they complain?
The evidence is there for anybody that wants to see it.
Regards, Pet

AUG 7 2013 MP JOHN HEMMING's BLOG
Wednesday, August 07, 2013
READ the blog
Mike Clarke and his mother Ann (on the run in Spain)
Mike Clarke has been on the run in Spain for some time. He was on the run because he was given a 3 month prison sentence for contempt because he failed to remove what he put on the internet relating to a court of protection case. Since that point (and I am not sure when this happened) the judiciary have published a number of judgments relating to his case. There is a court of appeal case:
Re_Clarke_(2013)_EWCA_Civ_811,_(2013)_MHLO_52
And a number of COP cases:
[2012] EWHC 2947 (COP)
[2012] EWHC 2714 (COP)
[2012] EWHC 2256 (COP)
What is interesting is that the judgment relating to his imprisonment (which should have been public in any event) has not been published.
Contempt of court is not an extraditable issue. However, at the moment he is a bit stuck in Spain and unable to return to the UK. I do personally think there should be a published judgment explaining why he was imprisoned. The new practice directions require this (I accept the case happened before the issuance of the new PD, but after the imprisonment of Wanda Maddocks). There also needs to be a way forward without public funds being wasted on imprisoning someone where it is difficult to see the public interest in imprisoning him.

AUG 6 2013 FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION
Subject: FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATION
Importance: High
ACLU of Florida
Executive Director: Howard Simon
4500 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 340 Miami, FL 33137
Phone: (786) 363-2700 Fax: (786) 363-1107
Dear Mr. Simon:
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion, abridging the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.
READ about first amendment
As you can see from the correspondence below, www.web.com is in violation of the First Amendment if they shut down this website based on a request from someone in another country who wants to conceal crimes that are being committed against the British public.
Mr. Clarke is entitled to free speech and, even in the UK, the law upholds free speech. What this Florida based website’s corporate council intends to do will deny citizens the right to expose corrupt activity and be in violation of the law.
If they get away with this, then how will it affect US journalists?
Will you please take some action? We wonder if graft is involved.
Yours sincerely,
J
From: len lawrence [mailto:bae146@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: August-05-13 7:56 AM To: Mike Clarke; jtenenbaum@web.com; TLam@web.com Cc: peter@hofschroer.com; gollis@btinternet.com; len lawrence; diansmt5@aol.com; aerotoxicangel@gmail.com; Florence Bellone; caul.grant@yahoo.com; sammy12102@yahoo.co.uk; theearthneedsrebelsshow@freethinkingvoice.tv; editor@ukcolumn.org; Kate; truthwars@live.co.uk; neil.barker@neebert.net; yvonnegoder@hotmail.co.uk; bonnie@salem-news.com; fumeevent@gmail.com; baileyd@talktalk.net; againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk; press@rttv.ru; maxkeiser@rttv.ru; feedback@rttv.ru Subject: RE: OPG.ME
Jonathan D. Tenenbaum, Esq. Corporate Counsel Web.com 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 Office: (904) 251-6291 | Fax: (904) 880-0350
Mr Tenenbaum
Take a close look at what is occuring in the United Kingdom before you decide to take down Mike OPG Website.
UNDER THE RADAR / LEN LAWRENCE PILOT AND THE COURT ... Reading - Victims Unite!
I have a order from Mr Justice Adrian Fulford Queens Bench Division that I cannot bring to the attention of any Judge including the Family Division and Court of Protection that the Senior Master Queens Bench Queens Bench Division holds three Court of Protection Medical Certificates that were not disclosed to the Court of Protection.
There is a 70 year old grandparent that faces prision if they disclose that their grandson has been was assaulted whilst under the care of Social Services.
Until very recently people Yvonne Golder and Wander Maddox have been jailed by secret courts in the United Kingdom, this practice has recently been stopped by Sir James Munby, thats to websites like Mike OPG bring these cases to the public attention. Justice: the scandal of secret courts - EU Referendum
There are many other cases like those of Peter Hofschroer and Neil Baker.
I do not understand why Web.com and Network Solutions would wish to hide the above events from the public ?
Yours sincerely
Leonard Lawrence -------- Original Message -------- Subject: OPG.ME Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 13:39:48 +0000 From: Jonathan Tenenbaum To: Mike Clarke CC: Tom Lam Mr. Clarke:
As you are likely aware I represent Network Solutions. With respect to the website opg.me and related dispute we have received the following notice from the complainant in the matter: “Please find attached Mr Clarke’s notice of appeal (a copy of which we have now secured from the Court of Appeal). As you will see, this is an appeal of the order of Judge Justice Peter Jackson dated 24 October 2012, and is not an appeal of the order of His Honour Judge Pelling QC relating to the imprisonment of Mr Clarke for failure to comply with the injunction to removal material from the website at the domain name www.opg.me.
I also draw your attention to documentation found on the website, which is attached to this email. Posted on the website is correspondence between Mr Clarke and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (“the Ombudsman”).
A letter from the Ombudsman dated 4th February 2013 states that:
“ It has come to our attention that correspondence we have sent you has been uploaded onto your websites(s). …. I have taken legal advice on this matter and I must inform you that by uploading information … supplied to you by the Ombudsman during her consideration of your complaint, you are in breach of Section 11(2) of the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967… “
It is therefore clear that Mr Clarke, as registrant of the website, is committing further breaches by posting material. Furthermore, a complaint has now been made by a Parliamentary body appointed by the Crown.
Given that Mr Clarke has not removed content which breaches the final injunction order made by the honourable Mr Justice Foskett on 2nd May 2012 within the deadline of 9th February 2013 and has not removed content which is in breach of an Act of Parliament, I should be grateful if you could update me by return (i.e. by close of business tomorrow) as to when the website will be disabled.”
In light of the above we are compelled to disable the website, which we will do within the next three (3) days unless we receive an authoritative order to the contrary. Thank you in advance for your understanding and please feel free to contact us with any questions.
Best,
Jonathan D. Tenenbaum, Esq. Corporate Counsel Web.com 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 Office: (904) 251-6291 | Fax: (904) 880-0350

AUG 5 2013 PETER Hofschröer TO WEB.COM
Dear Mr Tenenbaum,
May I ask you to reconsider your decision here?
I first came across the case of Mike Clarke and his mother Ann a few years ago, when out of sheer frustration at the way the British authorities were refusing to stop the systematic abuse of my then 80 year-old mother, I put up a blog on the internet.
You can see it on:
http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/
At that time, I was still naive enough to believe that Britain was a democracy with the rule of law and that somebody in authority would soon step in to stop this case of official corruption. I was a naive 53 year-old at that time.
Mike Clarke and many others then started contacting me. It soon became clear that my mother's case was the smallest tip of a very large, very foul iceberg.
Lord Maginnis of Drumglass was kind enough to take up our case in the House of Lords in London. His comments included:
"The Hofschroer case has been on my desk for several years now. A widow in her 80s was dispossessed of her home in a way that implies collusion between certain family members and the Social Services. A son who has come to the rescue has been harried by the North Yorkshire police (that particularly dubious constabulary merits careful investigation) to the extent that he and his aged mother have been pursued through an Interpol warrant to their "refuge" in Austria."
READ
"Does anyone in authority care that social services and police in North Yorkshire have conspired in the persecution of Mrs Hofschroer and her son? Are details of dismissals, forced retirements and other shady and costly measures pertaining to North Yorkshire Police available to legislators in Parliament? "
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2012-05-15a.258.7&s=Hofschroer#g332.0
The government refused to act here to stop social workers and police officers defrauding an 84 year-old invalid of her assets.
If you think this might be an isolated case, then simply google "Wanda Maddox", "Julie Bailey" and "Stafford Hospital".
You will then see terms like "genocide" and "deaths camps" used.
In Britain, the elderly are being systematically targeted, killed off and their assets seized. Part of the proceeds of this crime are being used to fraudulently offset the national debt.
It is not just the elderly, who are being targeted by the British authorities. The state is also systematically targeting children and stealing them. Many thousands have disappeared without trace. It is often the case that the children of visitors to Britain are targeted, particularly when their parents lack sufficient knowledge of English to understand what is happening. This theft of children and their subsequent trafficking has now got to a stage where complaints have been made by the governments of many countries to the British authorities. The one member of the British Parliament trying to do something about this is John Hemming MP. He recently made the following statement:
"That this House notes that 59 people representing the embassies of over 30 different countries attended a meeting in the House to discuss concerns about the perceived failure of courts in England and Wales properly to follow Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights; further notes that previously a number of governments have formally complained to the UK about the failures of the English and Welsh jurisdiction; recognises that international concern about the operation of care proceedings in the UK is growing; and calls for the Government and judiciary to respond to this concern."
http://www.edms.org.uk/2013-14/345.htm
Mike Clarke is one of the few people with sufficient courage to speak out against this horrifying state-sponsored crime against the vulnerable and defenceless.
Do you really want to stop him?
Yours sincerely, Peter Hofschröer

AUG 5 2013 website THREAT OF CLOSURE
email to web.com about threat of closure of website.

AUG 5 2013 LEN LAWRENCE TO WEB.COM
FAO Jonathan D. Tenenbaum, Esq. Corporate Counsel Web.com 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 Office: (904) 251-6291 | Fax: (904) 880-0350 Mr Tenenbaum
Take a close look at what is occuring in the United Kingdom before you decide to take down Mike OPG Website.
UNDER THE RADAR / LEN LAWRENCE PILOT AND THE COURT ... WATCH
Reading - Victims Unite! READ
I have a order from Mr Justice Adrian Fulford Queens Bench Division that I cannot bring to the attention of any Judge including the Family Division and Court of Protection that the Senior Master Queens Bench Queens Bench Division holds three Court of Protection Medical Certificates that were not disclosed to the Court of Protection.
There is a 70 year old grandparent that faces prision if they disclose that their grandson has been was assaulted whilst under the care of Social Services.
Until very recently people Yvonne Golder and Wander Maddox have been jailed by secret courts in the United Kingdom, this practice has recently been stopped by Sir James Munby, thats to websites like Mike OPG bring these cases to the public attention. Justice: the scandal of secret courts - EU Referendum
There are many other cases like those of Peter Hofschroer and Neil Baker.
I do not understand why Web.com and Network Solutions would wish to hide the above events from the public ?
Yours sincerely
Leonard Lawrence

AUG 5 2013
from; jtenenbaum@web.com
Mr. Clarke:
As you are likely aware I represent Network Solutions. With respect to the website opg.me and related dispute we have received the following notice from the complainant in the matter: “Please find attached Mr Clarke’s notice of appeal (a copy of which we have now secured from the Court of Appeal). As you will see, this is an appeal of the order of Judge Justice Peter Jackson dated 24 October 2012, and is not an appeal of the order of His Honour Judge Pelling QC relating to the imprisonment of Mr Clarke for failure to comply with the injunction to removal material from the website at the domain name www.opg.me. I also draw your attention to documentation found on the website, which is attached to this email. Posted on the website is correspondence between Mr Clarke and the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (“the Ombudsman”). A letter from the Ombudsman dated 4th February 2013 states that: “ It has come to our attention that correspondence we have sent you has been uploaded onto your websites(s). …. I have taken legal advice on this matter and I must inform you that by uploading information … supplied to you by the Ombudsman during her consideration of your complaint, you are in breach of Section 11(2) of the Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967… “ It is therefore clear that Mr Clarke, as registrant of the website, is committing further breaches by posting material. Furthermore, a complaint has now been made by a Parliamentary body appointed by the Crown. Given that Mr Clarke has not removed content which breaches the final injunction order made by the honourable Mr Justice Foskett on 2nd May 2012 within the deadline of 9th February 2013 and has not removed content which is in breach of an Act of Parliament, I should be grateful if you could update me by return (i.e. by close of business tomorrow) as to when the website will be disabled.” In light of the above we are compelled to disable the website, which we will do within the next three (3) days unless we receive an authoritative order to the contrary. Thank you in advance for your understanding and please feel free to contact us with any questions. Best,
Jonathan D. Tenenbaum, Esq. Corporate Counsel Web.com 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 Office: (904) 251-6291 | Fax: (904) 880-0350

AUG 5 2013 LAW: KNOW THE DIFFERENCE
READ about the difference of which law, COMMON, ADMIRALTY OR INTERNATIONAL.

AUG 4 2013 USA Common Law Court Action
WATCH Anthony Williams Foreclosure Defense July 30 2013 & how real justice should operate. Nearly everyone knows how corrupt the judicial system in the UK & America is, but very few people know how to confront it with knowledge, skill, and integrity. Private Attorney General Anthony Williams is one such special authority in this field of law, civil rights, and organized crime. Watching this video makes you want to scream and shout with joy, releasing anger, in great relief. Finally, there is evidence of a solution to the corruption in the legal system, and the unlawful "enterprise" called "The Bar," that has overtaken decency and "civility" in our common law and criminal justice systems by substituting "commercial psychopathology" (called "arrogance" and "greed") for reasonableness and justice.

AUG 2 2013 BIRTH CERTIFICATE SLAVE TRADE
READ about the birth certificate and the slave trade.

AUG2 2013 COURT OF PROTECTION FRAUDULENT JUDGE
READ about more evidence of a BIAS committal to prison hearing. In my committal to prison hearing in which I requested a trial by JURY for fear of BIAS I enclose a list of nominated court of protection JUDGES and who is no 26??
JUDGE MARK PELLING QC
If you are accusing the court of protection of FRAUD, THEFT, MAL ADMINISTRATION, CRIMINAL NEGLECT amongst a whole host of other things would you believe that an agent JUDGE of their own would be the correct person to judge a matter of committal to prison where the content is all based on the corrupt court? Even if you had a jury where one person was connected to the court of protection they would be excused so why are JUDGES acting so fraudulent, BECAUSE THEY ARE GETTING AWAY WITH IT!

JULY 30 2013 EMAIL TO HOUSE OF LORDS
READ the email to John Hemming & copied to House of Lords Mental Capacity Act review committee. Copied to Daily Mail & BBC.

JULY 30 2013 JUSTICE PERVERTS
READ about CAMERONS cheque book justice. Perverting the course of justice: Once a crime, now government policy

JULY 29 2013 Accounting For War: Press Conference
READ about Accounting For War: Press Conference 23rd APRIL 2013 including corruption at the top. Paying TAX is unlawful if it is used for unlawful ways such as illegal wars and the funding of such.

JULY 29 2013 The Birth of a Police State
READ about UK government is about to pass legislation which will make any behaviour perceived to potentially ’cause a nuisance or annoyance’ a criminal offence. What it will take for the slumbering British public to awake to the fact that the legal and physical infrastructure of a police state is being built around them?’

JULY 28 2013 THE EQUITABLE LIEN
READ about NEW LIFE IN AN OLD REMEDY?

JULY 28 2013 HACKED OFF ENQUIRY - LEVESON
Last month, it emerged that during his inquiry, Lord Justice Leveson had been sent an official report which indicated that some of Britain’s most respected industries routinely employ investigators who illicitly obtain personal information on business rivals and members of the public.
The report by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) revealed that — as a result of a criminal investigation called Operation Millipede — it had known several years ago that law firms, telecoms giants and insurance companies were hiring private investigators who broke the law to further their commercial interests.
Four men were subsequently convicted of conspiracy to make false representations to obtain confidential information.
One key hacker admitted 80 per cent of his client list was taken up by law firms, wealthy individuals and insurance companies. Only 20 per cent was attributed to the media.
Leveson chose not to explore the issue, because it was ‘outside the remit’ of his inquiry.”
“Does Dr Malley accept that some might find it odd that a senior figure at Hacked Off should then join a major law firm which was known to have funded the same controversial practices over which the lobby group had been apparently so exercised?”
Read more: HERE daily mail! Paul Jonson is head of the dispute resolution and regulatory division at Manchester-based Pannone, the law firm which represented David Hughes in his action. He says: ‘I don’t think there is any doubt this sort of behaviour was widespread around 2006, which was when David’s case was being handled by us.’
Early day motion 116
HACKED OFF, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE RULE OF LAW
Session: 2013-14
Date tabled: 16.05.2013
Primary sponsor: Hemming, John
Sponsors:
That this House notes that the Hacked Off campaign is chaired by Hugh Tomlinson QC; further notes that in a secret hearing Mr Tomlinson argued successfully for the secret imprisonment of Yvonne Goder for, inter alia, writing emails to regulatory bodies complaining about the wrongful transfer of property from an individual whose financial matters were managed by the court of protection; further notes that there is no public judgment about her imprisonment; further notes that Mr Tomlinson in the case CTB v NGN obtained an injunction that prevented the second respondent from obtaining evidence to prove that she was innocent of blackmail; further notes that a similar injunction in the Goodwin case prevented allegations of breaches of the RBS code of conduct being passed to the Financial Services Regulator; recognises that these are secretive legal actions which act against freedom of expression and the rule of law; further notes that Hacked Off has not responded to any questions written in emails or letters by the hon. Member for Birmingham, Yardley; calls for the members of Hacked Off to disassociate themselves from such actions; and further calls for the Government not to include in negotiations about press regulation any persons who do not disassociate themselves from such behaviour.
READ

JULY 27 2013 MORE REPRESENTATION DENIED
Dear Mike,
Thank you for your email but I regret that the area of law that you refer to is not one in which we practice, consequently we would not have the expertise required to assist you. Kind regards
Andrew Williams Chief Executive
Sent from my iPad
On 27 Jul 2013, at 12:22, "Mike Clarke" wrote:
> Can you help?
> www.opg.me
> > Above is our website.
> We are in exile from corruption and tyranny in the UK.
> > I am the carer for my mother for 17 years now and she has been a victim of the court of protection.
> As a result of campaigning and trying to gain justice for her I the son and carer have been sentenced to three months in prison for fraudulent harrasment charges.
> > We fled the country in January 2013.
> > Regards,
> Mike & Ann Clarke

JULY 26 2013 At last there is some hope
READ about Representatives of 34 countries have gathered at the House of Commons to voice their concerns to MP John Hemming over the rate that children of foreign families living in the UK are being taken into foster care & Lord Justice Munby has rightly declared his determination to alter the public’s view that these family hearings are ‘a system of unaccountable justice’.

JULY 22 2013 EMAIL FROM MP GORDON MARSDEN+reply
Dear Mr Clark
I am responding to the series of emails you have either sent or copied me in to over the last couple of weeks. I regret I have been unable to reply before now, partly just as John Hemming MP said to you, that he has been very busy so I am afraid have I, with a heavy round of duties at Westminster as well as many other casework issues from current constituents, and partly because I needed time to consider the latest set of materials you have sent. Having done so, I am still less than clear about how your current situation stands
Let me recap. As you are aware myself and my office have raised issues on your behalf and that of your mother over the past several years you have variously been in dispute with the office of the Public Guardian, the Court of Protection and Pannone Solicitors. The latest set of activity involved our correspondence with the Chief Executive of the OPG in May on your behalf last year and subsequently signing your application to request the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman to review the supervision of your mother’s affairs by the OPG. After further requests by us to the PHSO on your behalf, they finally informed us (and you) in November last year that they could not consider your complaint further – for which they offered detailed reasons – but would be prepared to do so if you mother Mrs Clarke or another family or personal representative of hers did submit one. It would now appear that no further action has been taken on that front but that you have now found yourself in contempt of the court as part of your ongoing dispute and have left the UK together with your mother to avoid the imposition of a custodial sentence for that contempt.
I cannot advise or make any comment on these latest proceedings – as I have told you before I am not a lawyer or solicitor and even if I were it has been my understanding that it would be improper and in breach of Parliamentary convention for me to do so. So far Mr Hemming has not been able to contact me at a meeting to discuss the complex procedures that are now being suggested – as he said to you he has been extremely busy and Parliament is now in recess. I will consider if I am able to do anything further as and when that discussion is able to take place. On the other matter of the PHSO it seems to me the option of your mother or her personal representative pursuing her complaint still remains open – it might be in her interest to pursue it. Yours sincerly
Gordon Marsden MP
(REPLY)
Dear MP Gordon Marsden
23.07.2013 published: www.opg.me
I refer to your recent letter by email on 22.07.2013 & the clarity you need of the current situation is;
1 We fled the Tyranny of the UK which clearly is run by criminals and the common laws that would protect one from such a tyranny are not being upheld by the powers that be, favouring their own rules and acts that are laced in BIAS, UNFAIR & without IMPARTIALITY.
2 This is clearly in breach of our HUMAN RIGHTS the last time I took the time out to understand such rights, leaving my 72 year old mother & me, your purged into exile, constituents that are indeed still CURRENT.
3 With the exception of my prison sentence brought about by corruption & treason we have moved no further on than when we last met, which to my recollection was indeed a trial within itself to attempt to make contact with you as you are well aware. I understand that you are busy but I do believe our situation warrants a lot more attention to it than you are offering to undertake.
4 If this problem was a one off occurrence where we were the only people affected I might be able to give some understanding to your partial brush off letter but this is certainly not the case as you are also fully aware of the problems associated via news and press articles ie DAILY MAIL and the involvement on other constituents fronts from court reformer MP JOHN HEMMING which I personally with many others hold a lot of praise for, in the time, effort and work, where he is attempting to bring about some justice to families.
5 It is not like we are even asking a lot, because John Hemming MP has offered to indeed put the work into the complex procedure of a petition to parliament that requires only, I believe, your delivery.
6 If it had been easy for me and mum to have moved to JOHN HEMMING MPs constituency area, believe me I would, as I have considered it and that is a measure of how desperate things have become that you surely, obviously have no understanding of, or indeed do express no care either to my astonishment.
7 It was Jack Straw and your party whom pushed the implementation of this corrupt body and whom seem to care not about the injustices it is dishing out to innocent elderly whom have capacity and their carers or relatives to imprison and separate from loved ones so as gain access to remaining wealth or property to place for sale.
8 I HAVE NOT BEEN IN CONTEMPT – This is purely a creature of common law and as such demands a jury of my peers where upon if my rights had been met and a jury present this would have been easy to sort out as a jury would not convict. And further - Sir John Donaldson M.R. (Master of the Rolls?): "Mens rea in the law of contempt was something of a minefield. The reason was that it was wholly the creature of the common law and had developed on a case by case basis".
"Wholly the creature of the common law"? Wow!
In Dean v. Dean [1987] F.L.R. 517, C.A. (Civ. Div.), the court said that: "Contempt of court, whether civil or criminal, is a common law misdemeanor and it had long been recognised that proceedings for contempt were criminal or quasi-criminal in nature and that the case against the alleged contemnor must be proved to the standard of criminal proof namely, beyond reasonable doubt"
A misdemeanor? Not even a felony? And had to be proved to criminal standards? Wow!
Until Att-Gen v. Newspaper Publishing plc and others [1988] Ch. 333, C.A. (Civ. Div.), there was widespread acceptance of the classification of contempts as being either civil or criminal. Civil contempt consisted of disobedience to an order of the court in circumstances where the disobedience is principally a matter that affects the parties to the case. Sir John Donaldson (again) later pointed out that the classification was not really relevant, since contempts have to be proved to criminal standards anyway.
Now, get this.
First of all we have Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974], ante, outlines the various ways which the due administration of justice might be prejudiced: "The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court to decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court"
"They should be able to rely on freedom from bias"? "They should be able to rely on no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court"? Errr... Judges, Magistrates, Clerks, Ushers, Security Men? Well, they are 'functions of the court'. "Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirement is contempt of court"? SO WHO IS IN CONTEMPT??
Here's something else:
Buckley J. held that "No contempt had been committed because the case was to be tried by a Judge sitting alone, who would be unaffected"
And, lastly (for now):
At common law, a contempt of court is an act or omission calculated to interfere with the due administration of justice: Att-Gen v. Butterworth Islands, re a special reference from [1893] A.C 138. There is no impediment to a court making a finding of contempt, when it is appropriate to do so, not against the Crown directly but against a government department or a minister of the Crown in his official capacity: M. v. Home Office and another [1993] 3 All E.R. 537, H.L
If you read all those quotations again ... which by the way, can use in Court ... since you will be quoting from Archbold ... then the conclusions you can draw are:
(a. Only Judges, Magistrates and Clerks of the Courts can be held as having been in Contempt of Court if they don't act STRICTLY under their Oaths of Office. Thus, when demanding them to repeat their Oath - and they say that is irrelevant - you can say "It is far from irrelevant, according to what Lord Diplock said, which is quoted in Archbold. Would you like a copy of what he said?". The point is that, IN LAW, mens rea is a crucial factor, i.e. INTENT. When refusing to give your Name, etc. what is your INTENT? The answer is to refuse the deception of acquiescing to Admiralty Law, by virtue of being a Land-dweller and only subject to the Law-of-the-Land. Whereas their INTENT is to deceive you into acquiescing to the Laws-of-Waters (whether they realise it [Judges] or not [Magistrates]!). YOU are attempting to bring the entire Court back to honourable, true, real 'justice' ... whereas they are trying to pervert that course.
(b. You can't be in Contempt of a Court where the Judge is sitting alone ... because s/he is unaffected. You can be in contempt of the other Party ... but NOT of the Judge or the Court. (Fundamentally this saying that a Judge's shoulders should be sufficiently broad as to brush off even direct insults! Assuming, of course, they acted diligently and with integrity, i.e. under their Oaths, etc). Without any shadow of a doubt a Local Council (for example) will be in contempt of you ... otherwise they would not have summonsed you.
(c. And note: "There is no impediment to a court making a finding of contempt, when it is appropriate to do so, not against the Crown directly but against a government department or a minister of the Crown in his official capacity".

9 I have been a victim of LAS legal abuse syndrome facilitated through the Deputy, The Office of the public guardian, The Court of Protection, The PHSO and MPs lack to act.
10 My mother is a victim of fraud, theft, mal administration, criminal neglect and suffering the TORTS that go along with it without being able to secure legal redress where her own funds have been used to defend the very persons committing the acts listed above.
11 Without such access to those funds we turned indeed to common law in which we believe we have a right to.
12 The statute acts and provisions laid out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 is not protecting the people it was put there to protect.
13 It is protecting criminals.
I do hope your clarity is further enhanced on this matter.
We, my mother and I, sincerely hope that as our MP you will assist and liaise to the best of your ability with JOHN HEMMING MP to bring about some peace and security to our lives that have been in upheaval for not just 13 years but the 6 years prior to the settlement, making the total misery lasting some 19 years now, perhaps on the 20th year justice might prevail under common law.
Yours sincerely
Regards, Mike & Ann Clarke
READ the PDF version

JULY 22 2013 SOCA gone CRIMINAL

When police brazenly protect organised criminals with law degrees, there is a serious global threat to security and human rights alike. This shows that crime has taken over Britain.

JULY 21 2013 OVERCHARGING CASE
READ about more OVERCHARGING http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1693187/Alzheimers-couple-charged-44400.html

JULY 19 2013 EMAIL of INTEREST
On 19/07/2013 00:29, A wrote:
Dear Sir,
Whilst to the untrained observers eye it may look like you are slightly bonkers, I think you are definitely on to something.
I suspect something amiss with freemason named above Judge pelling qc sitting at Manchester.
He has made a very dubious decision in law which severely harms my interests, not related to the CoP which I have read and am only too aware of from The Daily Mail.
They seem predators, exactly like you say.
Obviously your correspondence may be being monitored but I would very much like to hear from you.
A

REPLY

Thank you for your email A.
Not sure where you read about me.
I am most definately onto something which is why I have been purged into exile under the threat of prison.
These people are criminals.
Probably through masonic interests, the court BIAS is rife and out of control leaving a man's common law rights in tatters.
The situation is widespread and to be honest gaining a fair and impartial trial is probably next to zero without a jury.
Its a smaller percentage of judges bringing the whole judiciary into disrepute, again possibly through masonic allegiences to the brethren brotherhood, but its whole contradictions are failing to convince me.
I do believe in my rights of Magna Carta the Bill of Rights alongside others that are without doubt OLD but none the less still in force. Statute Acts are based on consent which we withrew along time ago.
Even their own rules ie Mental Capacity Act Section 5 The protection of carers - they are ignoring, glossing over, to bend and shape to what ever they want, UTTER CORRUPT and one or two of these need hanging for TREASON.
Our human rights are not being met.. simple . com PELLING knows it and so do the rest of the chaotic mess calling themselves courts!
Legal Law is not LAWFUL. There is a whole god damn difference and all they are trying to do is force feed it to you, whether you like it or not, using COERCION & BLACKMAIL which I will not concede to.
Sorry to drone on. I have done my homework and I have read more than enough to convince me I am right, they are wrong and CORRUPTION is running rife. THIS IS A TYRANNY.
Regards,
Mike & Ann Clarke
31 Cherry Tree Rd
Blackpool
FY4 4NS


A wrote; It's terrible that they are trying to stop you claiming the commercial lien which shows you are most definitely onto something and they know it. I see it's still on your website so my query is did they unlawfully imprision you for 3 months as sought? -- A
reply
It is my sincerely held belief that the commercial lien is the sole reason why they have committed further unlawful acts. On the 14.1.2013 Pelling ignored all that was put forward by me & further by my defence team and I was left defenceless. Representation on a legal basis was sought but refused as legals fighting legals is not possible, apparently, which I have in writing.
The so called "admiralty administrative statute tribunal hearing" could not hear anything but their own - BIAS, UNFAIR & definately not IMPARTIAL it also requires the consent of all parties on its star chamber basis, which was refused and therefore unlawful, where its 'Judge' is without Jurisdiction for a multitude of reasons, not least of all operating not on his oath of office and further without consent from all parties in a room that was not a constitutional court that was applied for, on a conditional basis of acceptance of proceedings, served on the Judge and the High Court prior to proceedings.
After failing to maintain his authority by refusing to answer fundamental questions about PELLINGs lack of jurisdiction & the throwing out of my defence by PELLING the force of G4S security and the POLICE present after 7 minutes where PELLING walked out of the proceedings informing security he was not returning until my defence had been removed from court at which some 23 minutes later PELLING returned to conduct his unlawful acts whilst I remained defenceless, where my witnesses stayed on, to listen to the corrupt remains, ending with a 3 month prison sentence unless I purge my contempt. No prosecution witnesses available to testify their lies - which is lies. Hearsay evidence, all admissable.
Reading about purge and the corruption all becomes even more clear combined with a strong dose of coercion to blackmail. The Commercial Lien is still there on my website and is still a live document against all the parties contained in it. The Commercial Lien stands for 99 years and is not a creature of LEGAL status, it is purely a LAWFUL status COMMON LAWFUL and they know this, any 'so called' Judge without jurisdiction trying to interfere with threats of coercion and blackmail in unlawful environments is actually committing TREASON - FACT!
NOW look at it from a distance and try and get the block picture, the establishment do not want the authority of a commercial lien being given legal acceptance by a JURY as it is the way forward to get remedy without employing corrupt LAWYERS & JUDGES. They will be out of business.

READ about http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re_Clarke_(2013)_EWCA_Civ_811,_(2013)_MHLO_52 (our case in the APPEAL COURT)

JULY 18 2013

READ about real news from http://akashictimes.co.uk/... & READ about http://akashictimes.co.uk/d-day-for-british-justice-how-mps-have-abolished-the-right-to-a-fair-trial/

Last week, the Justice and Security Bill was voted into law by MPs. The Bill has effectively spelled the end to fair trial in Britain by allowing both government authorities and commercial companies to take out criminal and civil proceedings against an individual without notifying them beforehand. It also gives the government the mandate to prevent suspects from gaining access to a lawyer of their choosing, hearing evidence against them, speaking out about their case or discovering the reason for a sentence being passed against them.

JULY 17 2013 FINALLY SOME PUBLICITY
READ about us on http://thesmallplaces.blogspot.com.es/ & WHAT CONSTITUTES NEWS

JULY 13 2013 CROSSECTION OF EMAILS
From the victomised. READ about how the state turns the guns of the Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act onto the very people who are campaigning for justice, attempting to get them incarcerated under the same unlawful acts and then rehabilitate through the use of needles etc and force them into submission. This just demonstrates how they get away with sectioning people under these acts without thorough proper consultation through impartial experts, my own mother has proved beyond reasonable doubt her capacity to take her own decisions through four, in-depth Clinical Nuero-Psychological Expert reports, conducted usually over 4 hour periods each and yet the Court dismissed them for one of their own that lasted 40 minutes!!.

JULY 12 2013 NO WORD from OUR MP
Still no word off our MP but yet MP JOHN HEMMING states he is liaising with MP GORDON MARSDEN about our problems, would one not think that as his constituents he would at least acknowledge our correspondence personally?

JULY 11 2013 CURRENT STATE OF POSITION
A meeting in the House of Commons is due to take place inclusive of my MP GORDON MARSDEN, MP JOHN HEMMING and the DAILY MAIL and others to discuss the current situation. One topic being put forward by John Hemming is to petition parliament. The Daily Mail are interested in going to print on the story but are discussing the legalities.
We are also once again going to write to the HIGH COURT for copies of;
The so called Judge's Notes of PELLING QC
The notes from the Stenographer
The Audio CD recording of events inclusive of when the Judge left court for 23 minutes.
We are currently drawing up all witnesses statements of the events that day.

JULY 10 2013 FELLOW CAMPAIGNER for JUSTICE
Roy Jenkins posted to Michael Doherty on Facebook

Michael, a friend of mine has recently been looking through documents for me ready for a court application to be made. He contacted me saying in a really surprised voice "Do you know how many times you have asked to be arrested and who you have asked to have arrest you and for what reason you should be arrested" , I simply replied a few times. Try again he said I have found over 50 requests of yours in a few documents, he then read out a few names, forgive this list you can remove this if you need to. Major, Bliar, Brown, Conmeran, Clegg all at Number Ten, Darling, Osbourne and others at Number Eleven Downing Street, around 20 chief constables of Scotland Yard, SOCA, West Midlands police, Staffordshire police, Warwickshire police. HM Customs CEO's, Serious Fraud Office. Loads of MPs, Flunkett, Reid, Clark, Straw, May of the Home Office. Lord Justices, Mr and Mrs Justices. To many judges to name. City of Westminster Magistrates Court, Royal Courts of Justice, several HHJ's, DJ judges in courts, plus more. He said "how the f--king hell has not one of these people NOT had you arrested, your words are seriously libellous if they are untrue". My reply was very simple "to arrest me they would have to arrest people right up to Number Ten for fraud, criminal acts, corruption, conspiracy". His reply to this was how can they defend what they have done. Simple really that's one of the reasons no banker has ever been arrested, isn't that right Mr Conmeran::) DON'T GIVE UP>

JULY 9 2013 CONTEMPT OF COURT
READ about contempt
1. Only Judges, Magistrates and Clerks of the Courts can be held as having been in Contempt of Court if they don't act STRICTLY under their Oaths of Office. Thus, when demanding them to repeat their Oath - and they say that is irrelevant - you can say "It is far from irrelevant, according to what Lord Diplock said, which is quoted in Archbold. Would you like a copy of what he said?". The point is that, IN LAW, mens rea is a crucial factor, i.e. INTENT. When refusing to give your Name, etc. what is your INTENT? The answer is to refuse the deception of acquiescing to Admiralty Law, by virtue of being a Land-dweller and only subject to the Law-of-the-Land. Whereas their INTENT is to deceive you into acquiescing to the Laws-of-Waters (whether they realise it [Judges] or not [Magistrates]!). YOU are attempting to bring the entire Court back to honourable, true, real 'justice' ... whereas they are trying to pervert that course.
2. You can't be in Contempt of a Court where the Judge is sitting alone ... because s/he is unaffected. You can be in contempt of the other Party ... but NOT of the Judge or the Court. (Fundamentally this saying that a Judge's shoulders should be sufficiently broad as to brush off even direct insults! Assuming, of course, they acted diligently and with integrity, i.e. under their Oaths, etc). Without any shadow of a doubt a Local Council (for example) will be in contempt of you ... otherwise they would not have summonsed you.
3. And note: "There is no impediment to a court making a finding of contempt, when it is appropriate to do so, not against the Crown directly but against a government department or a minister of the Crown in his official capacity". This must (in their little world) include Local Councils

JULY 9 2013 IS IT A PROPER COURT

JULY 8 2013 TRANSCRIPT RELEASE OF COURT 06.06.2013
READ

JULY 7 2013 DEFINITION OF "PURGE" your CONTEMPT
Re: Purge your contempt; In history, religion, and political science, a purge is the removal of people who are considered undesirable by those in power from a government, from another organization, from their team owners, or from society as a whole. Purges can be peaceful or violent; many will end with the imprisonment or exile of those purged, but in some cases they will simply be removed from office. Restoring people who have been purged is known as rehabilitation.
DEFINITION OF "BLACKMAIL"
Blackmail is an act, often a crime, involving unjustified threats to make a gain or cause loss to another unless a demand is met.[1][2] It may be defined as coercion involving threats of physical harm, threat of criminal prosecution, or threats for the purposes of taking the person's money or property
So, how can a person who so has the sincerest common held belief that his common law rights have been breached in Tribunal administrated admiralty statute courts that were clearly, not consented to and therefore VOID, then concede to an 'act' of coercion/BLACKMAIL!
I may have been PURGED but I will not be coerced to be BLACKMAILED. (catch 22)
DEFINE a "STATUTE" by BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY
A 'statute' is a legislative act of parliament, given the force of LAW, by the consent of the governed.
NO CONSENT! NO FORCE OF LAW! And I DID NOT CONSENT!
I cannot be in contempt of an unconsented to administrative tribunal, incidently, laced in BIAS that is not or was NOT FAIR and IMPARTIAL as is my HUMAN RIGHT.
A Civil Contempt Order is an Order of the Court finding that you have not complied with some act that the Court required of you. As a result of the non-compliance, the Court holds you in Civil Contempt and punishes you -- usually monetarily or by jail time, but suspends the punishment for a period of time, giving you the opportunity to "purge" yourself of the contempt by doing what the Court requires of you, for instance, by appearing for deposition. If you do what the court requires of you within the time allotted by the Court, you have "purged" yourself of contempt.
The highlighted bit of the above paragraph is, 'some act', and I refer you back to 'a statute act', black's law dictionary & where there has been no consent there is no force of law that can be associated making the original and or subsequent orders VOID, there is no contempt, it did not exist!
Not only does a statute act need your consent to be given the force of law but so does an administrative statute tribunal hearing. This is usually gained in a certain way, i.e, by entering their DOCK, or by standing when the Judge walks in or by being present helps. None of these things have I ever done, in fact, quite the opposite I have written to each individual court prior to date of hearing to proclaim my dissatifaction and that I do not consent and that a real common law court with Jury on this matter is the only court that can truly uphold the supreme common laws of this land in a FAIR and IMPARTIAL manner.
This of course is being denied, a denial of due process, another breach in my human rights. These parasites that have been sucking up cash from my mother in a fraud do not want all this exposing to the general public, so that they can continue with their ill gotten fraudulent gains against all walks of life for any manner of statute rule they choose to suddenly dream up and enforce against your will by dooping you into consent unknowingly!
This is what the government is trying to hide at all costs, and I believe thats why I have been PURGED into exile or prison. ALL of this is UNLAWFUL. Now, if the powers that be were going to demonstrate that their own made up rules and laws were supreme then they had the opportunity to address this in where it was shown to the court that their own MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 section 5, protecting carers from any civil liability in connection with the care and well being of any person coming under this act, but yet IGNORED - swept under the carpet. CLEARLY demonstrating what these people are prepared to do, BEND their own rules, to suit their own pockets. The vulnerable elderly or incapacitated, which lets not forget my mother can prove her capacity, are more vulnerable than ever at the expense of the government using words like PROTECTION and PRIVACY.
Define TRIBUNAL
A tribunal in the general sense is any person or institution with the authority to judge, adjudicate on, or determine claims or disputes—whether or not it is called a tribunal in its title.[1] For example, an advocate appearing before a court on which a single judge was sitting could describe that judge as 'their tribunal'. Many governmental bodies that are titled 'tribunals' are so described to emphasize the fact that they are not courts of normal jurisdiction. Consent by all parties needed.
Define HEARING
A place where you can be heard and not have your representation thrown out, where a right of audience is for everyone, not just the legal community, BIAS - UNLAWFUL.
Define ADMINISTRATIVE
Administrative law, which is the law of government agencies not common law not supreme law but bias law in favour of government agents.

JULY 5 2013 STOP SILENCE GAG & PERVERT JUSTICE
Dear Sue Reid (Daily Mail)
I just wondered Sue what is your position on this matter and at what point might you might be interested in publishing our plight.
We do not have a lawyer on this matter, you may have gathered in correspondence that we could not get legal representation.
Our overall brief synopsis is,
Denied legal representation
Common laws rights dismissed
What representation offered was deemed no right of audience and thrown out
Hearsay evidence admitted
No prosecution witnesses
Tribunal Admiralty Hearings denied consent but ignored
Mothers finances stripped of uncapped charges that were promised to be capped in 2001
Failure to deliver requested detailed accounts and quite the opposite the hiding of them
Whilst in emigration for 4 years forced to live from pound sterling in a devaluing pound to some £100,000
During that emigration outside England & Wales jurisdiction - Fraud by false representation
The prevarication and deliberate obstruction to my mother securing a property exchange abroad, twice.
The deliberate devaluing of her UK property to try and escalate a quick sale of her home
The failure to provide to my mother her own funds to use for representation whilst the deputy was paid to represent himself from mums own funds
The courts own rules and acts laid out ie Mental Capacity act section 5 to protect carers - IGNORED
After the deputy told my mother his charges are unlikely to exceed £2000 per year he took in year 1 £26,377
Year 2 £14,000 and then proceeded to hide the fact.
He paid mum £200 weekly to live off whilst he took £507 weekly still unaccounted
The overall handling of mums finances to over £1.1 million pounds gone and unaccounted to mum whom...
Mum has 4 confirmed specialist doctors reports confirming that she HAS capacity!!
All complaints and investigations came to nothing - WOULD YOU TURN TO COMMON LAW??
IF A JURY WAS INVOLVED IN ANY OF THE ABOVE - WHO WOULD WIN???
IS THE CURRENT CORRUPT RULES AND SYSTEM LACED WITH BIAS IN FAVOUR OF ITS OWN AGENTS???
In short the OFFICE of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN and the Court of Protection have facilitated FRAUD against my mother and to try and cover that fraud from being exposed they have used harassment acts in tribunal courts to gain a VOID comittal order against the CARER to,
STOP
SILENCE
GAG
PERVERT THE COURSE OF REAL COMMON LAW JUSTICE WITH A JURY

Regards,
Mike & Ann Clarke
31 Cherry Tree Rd
Blackpool
FY4 4NS

PS the above is a partial picture of the overall full nightmare lasting 12 years!!

JULY 4 2013 LETTER TO MP MARSDEN
READ another letter to MP GORDON MARSDEN copied to Daily Mail & MP JOHN HEMMING.

Having just expressed an email of complaint about the lack of response from our MP Gordon Marsden to leader of the labour party ED MILLIBAND I now re enter what I wrote 2 years ago....
COPIED FROM ENTRY 04102011
FAST BUCK CULTURE
Ed Milliband

Labour talk about eradicating the "fast buck" culture but yet in our eyes it was them that created it, via Jack Straw with the initial COURT OF PROTECTION and all the fast buck's being made, were being delivered into the hands of the elite from the pockets of the vulnerable on the pretense of protection. Such lies and hypocrisy is tantamount to treason of the vulnerable british minority of elderly and incapacitated which are easy pickings for governments when their own pockets are virtually bankrupt. They do talk some shite! Link to Jack Straw 2009 thefts!!

JULY 2 2013 TO MP GORDON MARSDEN
Dear Gordon Marsden
I have faxed your office in BLACKPOOL with a copy of some emails between myself and John Hemming. He has indicated that he is happy to submit a petition to parliament on ours and your behalf with regard to our severe problems of a failure to get JUSTICE &
any legal representation
any full investigation by police
any investigation by the public guardian
any investigation by the PHSO

Having turned as you are aware to common law and issued a claim we now find ourselves on the run from a prison sentence for fraudulent harassment charges and corrupt contempt of court charges.
I have written to you many many times and the only response we get, meaning my mother and I, is an acknowledgement by electronic automated response.
Considering the deep problems associated with the OFFICE OF PUBLIC GUARDIAN and COURT OF PROTECTION that we publicly are not alone in, I would of expected to be truthful more involvement from yourself as your constituents, me and my mother.
The matter is now more urgent than ever. I forwarded to you the PHSO's recent response and their lack of being able to get on with the task to hand and your last comments to me in person where that failing the PHSO's completed investigation you may be able to do more.
I trust this is the suggestion that MP John Hemming is making or can I ask with urgency do you have any other ideas to put forward. If you feel it would be easier to liaise with John Hemming please feel free to do and he then in turn can advise us. full letter 603005
petitions

JUNE 30 2013 SOLD

Castle for corrupt politicians to hide in, bankers, multi-national companies, the owners of our national utilities, gas, water, electricity, knighthoods for owners of asda and the others.602976

JUNE 29 2013 Law reform minister’s firm paid £200,000 from legal aid
READ about HELEN GRANT with her hand in the gravy train.
The minister in charge of legal reform is disclosed to be an indirect beneficiary of the legal-aid “gravy train”. Her situation has led to officials privately demanding that she be excluded from decisions on the system.
READ about my letter to her about COURT OF PROTECTION reform with the OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN that did not even get a reply.

JUNE 28 2013 UK COLUMN TV INTERVIEW
WATCH FELLOW CAMPAIGNER Len Lawrence on COURT of Protection corruption.

JUNE 27 2013 OVER THE PHONE JUSTICE
READ about judges taking decisions over the phone in one sided vague submissions of evidence.

A BLAST FROM THE PAST

Still campaigning after sending this card to several in January 2012 but now still free from a prison sentence we carry on from abroad in a country that takes care of their elderly where we are out of arms reach from JUDICIAL CORRUPTION as POLITICAL PRISONERS.

JUNE 27 2013 HOW CORRUPT IS THE BRITISH JUDICIARY?
JUDICIAL EXECUTIVE BOARD AND OFFICIAL RECORDINGS OF COURT HEARINGS
That this House notes that the Judicial Executive Board (JEB) recently decided that it would no longer be possible to listen to official recordings of court hearings; further notes that the JEB has not given a reason for this decision or a date of the meeting at which this decision was taken; further notes that no minutes of the JEB are published on the internet; believes that reasons should be given for such a material shift in the transparency and accountability of the judicial system; and calls for those reasons to be given and for the JEB to publish the minutes of its meetings on the internet save where Freedom of Information exemptions would apply.
READ

JUNE 27 2013 PSYCHIATRY ABUSE IN FAMILY COURTS
READ a partial extract from Mr Justice Peter Jackson Court of Protection “Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised” End Quote. Robert Watts, Senior Partner, Ratcliffe Duce & Gammer Solicitors alleged to the Law Society that the reason Slough County Court would not allow Leonard Lawrence access to the Court of Protection, when Mr Lawrence was a patient and subject to the Court of Protection, was that it would have caused a delay in legal proceeding. 75% of those like Leonard Lawrence with acquired brain injury are divorced by their spouse, sadly Mr Justice Peter Jackson and the Court of Protection can afford no protection to extremely vulnerable adults.

JUNE 27 2013 Parliamentary reply 4 months later
READ a reply from the PHSO Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman that has taken them 4 months.
READ the original exchange.

JUNE 25 2013 FELLOW CAMPAIGNER
READ about fellow campaigner and his description of what's happening to 'our' courts. The UK holds itself up as a paragon of virtue around the world, criticising other countries for having political prisoners, and abusing peoples human rights, when in fact we have political prisioners here in the UK. The English Legal system is absolutly terrible. I cannot imagine how awful the government is being by ignoring the law and cheating the citzen to gain an advantage. Comment by another:- They must be sick by using our money to ridicule us and take the piss by setting up organizations to protect government. I do not know what the hell we can do about it because no one can do anything. All i can do is try to prosecute those judges responsible to try and get some sense into them. The legal fraternity with the criminal justice system needs serious counselling.

JUNE 25 2013 LETTER FROM PANNONE
READ a letter from PANNONE LLP showing their contempt for what they have done and are party to, no matter how they continually try to distance themselves from the corruption that they are at the centre of. Needless to say that their barrister is in fact a witness to what transpired in the courtroom and will undoubtedly be summoned at some later date to state what he saw and witnessed. It was all Pannone's doing in this matter to formulate it's conspiracy kangaroo court where there where no prosecution witnesses to testify their lies, where heresay evidence was allowed to be used and where the whole content was laced in bias in which they are fully aware of in order to gain their ill gotten committal order of a VOID nature from a facist corrupt Justice system serving not the people but themselves. Ultimately of course, to stop, silence, gagg - pervert the course of trying to obtain justice to what can only be described as a fraud committed upon my pensioner mother.

JUNE 18 2013 UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODES
How admiralty law is operating as statute law and denying the use of common laws, unless you can grasp the overall operation of these courts and then reserve all your rights without prejudice under these commercial uniform codes UCC(1-308(old 1-207).9). We are, of course, all equal under the law but that's providing you know the law and of course, we do not, otherwise we'd all be lawyers! The games that are being forced upon us are nothing short of despicable by governments and judicial agents stripping lay persons of their common law rights to do as they please within UCC's heading toward a one world government and a one world court. Read The UCC connection.pdf
Read UCC 1 and 3.pdf

JUNE 16 2013 to JOHN HEMMING MP (BBC & DAILY MAIL)
Re: parliamentary ombudsman. COURT OF PROTECTION 16.06.2013

FAO MP John Hemming copied to MP Gordon Marsden & DAILY MAIL & BBC

Dear John Hemming MP
You may recall I wrote to you many moons ago on May 29 2012 regarding the involvement of the Parliamentary Ombudsman.
The PHSO dragged and dragged and dragged some more till finally nothing came from them and our patience exhausted.

We turned to common law and when a claim was issued it resulted in a claim of harassment against me. The courts involved, I claimed were unconstitutional therefore invalid by bias and by refusing judgement by my peers.
This was ignored and so I considered them VOID orders.

It eventually came to an additional unconstitutional court of committal which I refused to attend but did send in representation.
The representation was thrown out and police were called, the court continued in my absence then undefended and they issued a 3 month prison sentence.

I and my mother fled the country on the 13th January 2013 the day before the court case 2MA90015 fearing the worst.
We having been living in exile abroad on the run ever since.
We have been unable to get legal representation.

The court would not send the transcripts. The transcript finally arrived this week some 6 months later via the prosecuting company solicitors PANNONE LLP and the transcripts did not match several witness accounts in the courtroom events.

I have requested on several occasions the audio CD copy of the court room events but to no avail. I have also requested the JUDGES notes but to no avail. I have requested the stenographers notes but to no avail.

Because the legal system would be fighting the legal system apparently you cannot get legal representation. So without any defence, with representation being thrown out and the courtroom corruption running rife we reside in exile in fear of our own countries lack of a credible Justice system.

If in the event my mother and me are captured, we will claim POLITICAL ASYLUM due to breaches in our human rights.
What I ask can be done??
How did WANDA MADDOCKS gain justice, HOW was she vindicated??
Mike & ANN CLARKE

JUNE 13 2013 Legal ABUSE SYNDROME
Consequences of abuse [edit]Although the primary consequence of unaddressed legal-system abuse for victims is injustice, abuses of the legal system inflict harm in many other ways. Civil litigation and criminal defense of the innocent impose psychological stress, often severe, upon the parties involved. Often such stress will affect physical health as well. When the system is abused and justice is denied as a result, stress and its effects can be exacerbated enormously.[1][unreliable source?] Karin P. Huffer, M.S., M.F.T. hypothesized the condition Legal Abuse Syndrome (LAS) as a form of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) caused by ethical violation, legal abuse, betrayal, abuse of power, abuse of authority, lack of accountability and fraud.[3][4] Chronic and high-profile legal abuse have societal effects as well, including distrust of the law, law enforcement and the legal system, rationalization of small crimes by ordinarily honest citizens, and psychological stress.[citation needed]

JUNE 13 2013 SHORT POSITION STATEMENT
Since the 14th January 2013 and the start of our insecure position, it has resulted in moving home 5 times. On one occasion where we had no option but to sleep in the car as the position had become dire. Throughout our ordeal of being persecuted by an unethical corrupt legal and judicial system operating with impunity in the UK my mother remains resiliant in her own stance on this matter of corruption against her and I. She repeatedly states that though I have given her all the options to return to the UK whether it be to her own home or to her daughters care she refuses point blank to do so without me. Her sole desired aim is to stay with me her son and carer of 17 years regardless. My partner of 5 years also is resolute in all this, that he continues to protect her and me no matter what. We are currently settled, but yet still traumatised by our experiences and we will continue to fight this matter until some sort of justice comes our way hopefully, amongst the sea of injustices that have been forced upon us. The property mum owns in the UK has been systematically raided by police in the early hours of mornings which has inturn led to the income from its lodgers to be lost as they had become sick and tired of early morning raids by the police and so left. Our income diminished substantially we have sold possessions to maintain our existence whilst abroad and are now looking for work to feed us and sustain our living. All of this takes its toll on the so called protected party of the court of protection where infact they have exploited her, abused her and used her, failing to give any such protection in a wreckless manner to try and protect the exposure of the frauds against her that we continue to attempt to expose even with all the risks being associated with it.

JUNE 13 2013
13/06/2013 PENDING APPEAL to the committal Case 2MA90015 Manchester High Court
Melanie McGuirk of PANNONE LLP Solicitors
I wrote to you over a week ago and have not received a reply.
After a six month wait I finally received your transcript of the 14th January Court hearing.

The transcript did not match witness events.
I requested the cd audio copy of the transcript.
I also requested a copy of the Judges Notes.
I also requested a copy of the stenographers notes of the events.
You have failed to send even an acknowledgement.
I now ask why?
Mike Clarke

JUNE 7 2013 PANNONE EXCHANGE
Dear Melanie
My representation would also like a copy not just of the CD audio recording transcript but,
1. The Judges notes
2. The stenographers record of events
Mike Clarke
From: Melanie McGuirk
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 6:51 PM
To: mike@opg.me ; mike@rake.net
Cc: Melanie McGuirk
Subject: Pannone LLP
Dear Sir
We write further to your email dated 5th June 20 We attach
1 a transcript (in three parts) of the hearing on 14th January 2013
2 a letter from Pannone LLP sent to mike@rake.net dated 30th January 2013 which enclosed transcripts of all the previous hearings in the proceedings
Yours faithfully
Pannone LLP

JUNE 6 2013 SENTENCING TRANSCRIPT RELEASED
Read THE 14.1.2013 SENTENCING TRANSCRIPT ONLY JUST RELEASED. NOW READ OUR VERSION IN A SHORT STATEMENT BY WITNESS... Read
A STATEMENT of appeal was sent in to the court and no reply was ever received. This court operated without any defence and without any prosecution witnesses with its findings of hearsay all accepted. It does'nt take a rocket scientist to work out that we are a world of corruption in the UK where if you come up against the legal world you will be denied any representation and where Judges will operate outside common law to conduct themselves above the law in a treasonous manner to attain what they want. The justice being dished out by the Court of Protection and its cronies aint justice at all, its abuse of power with impunity extending to the highest of levels bringing the judiciary into disrepute. The upheaval and ferrocity of the chaos placed upon my mother's remaining life in her late years will no doubt hasten her to her death faster than being where she desired to be and with whom she wanted to be with & the award intact, that was promised by the first general order of THE COURT OF PROTECTION, its senior Judge Denzil Lush and his agent HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP. They have lied, plundered by mal practice and stole hundreds of thousands to suit their needs without accountability except to themselves. The Judiciary appears to scared to speak out against their own opting essentially to protect each other based probably on MASONIC brotherhood oaths to each other and to continue to break age old laws of judgement by peers to rid out bias and impartiality where even written in todays Human Rights they care not about either. Is this not a state of TYRANNY that needs to be dealt with?
Read the notice that was served upon the judge prior to the case that in the transcript he admits he read all that was served on him.

JUNE 6 2013 LORD JUSTICE MCFARLENE
LISTEN to an application to appeal the costs refused.

JUNE 5 2013 LETTER TO HUGH JONES and PANNONE
SUBJECT of CORRUPTION and PERSECUTION and BREACHES OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Michael Clarke Case 2MA90015 14.01.2013 linked to Ann Clarke’s case of FRAUD case B4 2013/0087 6th June 2013 10am
Ref COURT of Protection
FAO HUGH JONES of Hugh Jones Solicitors and LUCY NICOL of Pannones
05/06/2013
Dear Hugh Jones and Lucy Nicol
On the 14th of January 2013 the legal fiction Michael Clarke was sentenced to 3 months in prison in a corrupt court room. unconstitutionally formed and operating outside common laws, by a corrupt Judge, breaching the Magna Carta, the Bill of rights and Human rights acts.
I requested to the court by letter an appeal but no reply was ever received. I have requested several times a copy of the transcripts of that hearing to which again no replies have been received.
I hereby request the transcript of that hearing sent to me, ideally today, by return email for the addition to our court of appeal hearing tomorrow at 10 am by telephone conference call to our place of exile from the fraud and corruption that you both are associated with via your companies.
Kind regards
Mike Clarke
Ann Clarke

June 04 2013 WANDA MADDOCKS ON YouTUBE
Watch RUSSIAN TV of the places, reporting on British Corrupt injustices!

MAY 2013
Sign the petition to stop secret courts = http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/the-secrecy-of-the-family-courts-should-be-lifted-now/sign.html#se

MAY 9 2013 LETTER TO APPEAL COURT
Read yet another letter to appeal courts for full disclosure via an interim order and assurances to our safety. Hello Mike of the family Clarke , Your fax to FAO A SMITH REF B4/2013/0087 (+44 20 79476621) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

MAY 9 2013 Let me tell you this.pdf
Read further follow up mail to GRAYLING from disgruntled public about in-justice rife in the justice system.

MAY 9 2013 NOT ALONE
Read yesterdays correspondence from fellow campaigner for an investigation into endemic corruption within the ministry of Justice.

MAY 08 2013
Read about HUGH JONES SOLICITORS and the team/statement... "We do not charge exorbitant fees, as these are assessed by the courts, so you can be sure that they are above board and fair." Now Read 1st general order 20.03.2001 pdf and his statement back then in 2001 where his fees he told the judge, the court, the family and his client, my mother, that his fees would not eradicate the capital heads of damages awarded and where his fees were predicted at £2000 per year amounting to over 10 years not exceeding £20,000. In his first year he took £26,377 and proceeded to hide the fact from his client with his second year at £14,000. His total fees exceeded over £150,000 and then he fraudulently maladministered another £100,000 and still to this day has refused to supply any detailed accounts, backed up by the office of the public guardian and court of protection fraudsters. HUGH JONES solicitors have been built off the backs of vulnerable little old ladies whom indeed have capacity, assisted and facilitated by the organised criminal elite working within the Court of Protection and its collection of fraudulent, treasonous, "so-called" JUDGES, bending laws and rules to suit their own criminal pockets. On top of all that, anyone, seeking justice and accountability is being sent to prison under the guise of "Contempt of Court" in fraudulent courts, unrepresented, or representation being thrown out of court, without any jury being given, even if requested, flagrantly breaching The Magna Carta, The Bill of Rights & The Human Rights Act with impunity, amounting to a TYRANNY.
Forcing people out of their homes and in cases like ours forcing them out of their own country to flea the TYRANNY(arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority).

MAY 7 2013 Email to Daily Mail
Read an email sent to Daily Mail...

MAY 6 2013 DAILY MAIL
Read CHRIS Gayling MP orders a review of Court of Protection.

MAY 06 2013 JUDGE RULING
Read it published on Baili website

MAY 06 2013 ARTICLE
Read Daily Mail article about new instructions for Judges...

APRIL 29 2013 FRONT PAGE NEWS
Read the article...

APRIL 28 2013 NEWS ARTICLE
Read an article in the GUARDIAN newspaper.

APRIL 27 2013 APPEAL COURTS
Read APPEAL COURT date for new hearing ...

APRIL 25 2013 DAILY MAIL
Read article 1
Read article 2

APRIL 10 2013
watch video

APRIL 10 2013 GET OUT OF COURT FOR FREE
FOR DAVID CAMERON
Read davidcameron08042013.pdf
Read helengrantletter11022013.pdf
Read BP Collins FINAL REPORT 20 July 2009.pdf

APRIL 7 2013
Read more fraud... http://anajinn.blogspot.ca/2010/10/letter-to-british-prime-minister-and.html

APRIL 5 2013 LONDON COURT OF APPEAL
Phone call to the court of appeal this lunchtime today confirmed there is of yet no movement as the case is still before progression lawyers to consider its content.

APRIL 3 2013
Read about HUGH JONES quits PANNONES.
The head of court of protection at Pannone’s Manchester office has left the firm to set up his own court of protection outfit with former Pannone partner Rachel Dobson.
According to a source close to the situation Hugh Jones is taking a “considerable amount” of clients from Pannone to his firm, Hugh Jones Solicitors, as well as up to 10 staff members, including administrators and solicitors, from the department.
However, a spokesperson for Pannone said the only person leaving the department was Jones, who they admitted had “acquired some Court of Protection business from Pannone since he left the firm in March. Following Jones’s departure Lucy Nicol has been promoted to lead the department. Any support staff expected to join Hugh Jones Solicitors are not understood to have been impacted by last year’s redundancies, when 12 fee-earner and support staff roles were made redundant in the firm’s construction, road traffic accident and family teams in Manchester (10 January 2012). The firm was then set to make its second round of redundancies last year with 16 lawyer and support staff positions facing the axe (12 November 2012). According to a press statement Jones was advised by Frank Shepherd at DWF and Nigel Barratt at Hursts on the launch. He did not respond to requests for comment at the time of writing.

MARCH 26 2013 Phone call to APPEAL COURT
[14:52:00] *** Call to APPEAL COURT LONDON, duration 01:04. *** whom said that the case has gone before lawyers to consider the next course of action and that the reply may take up to another week.

MARCH 22 2013 COURT OF APPEAL
Telephone to them for an update to which they said they had created a mini bundle they required the full judgement on costs to which I faxed the following Read. Hello, Your fax to Case progression MANAGER Rita Downes 2013/0087 (+44 20 79476810) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

MARCH 21 2013 VOID ORDERS
Read Dunhill v Burgin (No 2).pdf on VOID ORDERS

MARCH 19 2013 CAMERON COURT REPLY
Read davidcameroncourtreply.pdf

MARCH 8 2013 MoJustice Memo with Official Solicitor
Read the Memorandum of Understanding between The Ministry Of Justice and the Official Solicitor and the related freedom of information request LINK.
Read FOI 80758 Ms Lucy Series 06 03 13.pdf
Read MOU MOJ OS 050510.pdf
Read AP ARK 250213.pdf

MARCH 7 2013 JUDGEMENT ENTERED
JUDGEMENT against HIS HONOUR JUDGE MARK PELLING QC for failing to pay an interim payment requested off his £1,000,000 contract of debt ...
Read STAT DEC of CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE served
Read the STAT DEC contract served
Read the skeleton argument served
Read the NOTICE to HIGH COURT served
ALL IGNORED BY THIS JUDGE
Read the summons served
AGAIN IGNORED BY THIS JUDGE
Proving the fact that they believe they are above the LAW!!
Read JUDGEMENT07022013_merged.pdf ALL 24 Pages
[14:49:54] PamFax: Hello, Your fax to VOID case 2MA90015 FAO PELLING QC (+44 161 2405050) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

MARCH 7 2013
Read transcript2ndrequest07032013.pdf ... Hello, Your fax to VOID case 2MA90015 FAO Rose Shaw (+44 161 2405050) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

MARCH 6 2013 DAVID CAMERON SUMMONS SERVED
Read david cameron court summons issued.pdf Read CONTRACT

MARCH 6 2013 from Len Lawrence
Read a letter from Len Lawrence.

MARCH 3 2013 THE PERSECUTED NORMAN SCARTH
Read about the persecuted NormanScarth.pdf when I read this it made all of my own problems fall right into perspective.

MARCH 2 2013 PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN
Read the reply to the PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman.

MARCH 2 2013 Leonard Lawrence the PILOT
Read about Leonard Lawrence the PILOT. Rt Hon Sir James Munby.pdf

MARCH 2 2013 INFORMATION TO READ
Read This needs to be sent far and wide.pdf

MARCH 1 2013 BLACKPOOL POLICE
Read the letter from Blackpool police denying responsibilty for harassment and trespass of mums property.

MARCH 1 2013 PHSO PARLIAMENTARY OMBUDSMAN
Read the letter from PHSO Parliamentary health and Service Ombudsman now released into the public domain where they are more concerned with investigating whats on my transparent website than investigating the cause of the overall problem.

MARCH 1 2013 COURT OF APPEAL
Read a Reply to the LONDON COURT of APPEAL about understanding that without FULL DISCLOSURE of all files by the respondents this case cannot proceed.
Hello, Your fax to Case progression MANAGER Rita Downes 2013/0087 (+44 20 79476810) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

FEBRUARY 25 2013 DAVID CAMERON SUMMONS TO COURT
SUMMONS ISSUED TO DAVID CAMERON.
Hello, Your fax to FAO NO OTHER PERSON THAN MR CAMERON (+44 20 79250918 ) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT. 25.02.2013@11am

FEBRUARY 22 2013 LONDON COURT of APPEAL reply
Dear Ms Clarke, The office requires a bundle of core documents before the application can progress.
These documents have already been provided by you and therefore for your assistance the office will compile a mini bundle on your behalf. This will include the sealed appellants notice, order and judgment under appeal, and the grounds and skeleton argument.
Please ensure that any further documents you wish to add to the bundle are provided within 7 days. After which the application will proceed to be listed/referred to a judge.
As you already have copies of these documents we will not be sending you a copy of the mini bundle.
Yours faithfully
Mrs Rita Downes
Case Management Section B (Room E314)
Civil Appeals Office, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
0207 947 6426 - Fax 0207 947 6810
civilappeals.cmsb@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

FEBRUARY 18 2013 WEBFUSION finally reply
Read about the suspension of domain www.opg.me.uk by WEBFUSION LTD and their reply posted today.

FEBRUARY 14 2013
Read CameronContractUPDATED14022013.pdf Hello, Your fax to FAO NO OTHER PERSON THAN MR CAMERON (+44 20 79250918 ) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

FEBRUARY 13 2013 NOTICE of CONTRACT to CAMERON
CONTRACT issued to David Cameron as the person holding ultimate responsibilty to protect citizens of the UK. [12:25:44] PamFax: Hello, Your fax to FAO NO OTHER PERSON THAN MR CAMERON (+44 20 79250918 ) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

FEBRUARY 13 2013 CONTRACT TENDERED UPON DOMAIN SERVER 123 reg
Read the contract served upon WEBFUSION LTD in response to the illegal closure of web domain www.opg.me.uk Hello, Your fax to fao LEGAL TEAM 123 reg www.opg.me.uk FAO CEO (+44 845 8590021) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

FEBRUARY 12 2013 CIVIL COURTS VIDEO CONFERENCING
Read about video conferencing for parties overseas.

FEBRUARY 11 2013 FAXed reminder TO DAVID CAMERON

FEBRUARY 10 2013 FAX TO DAVID CAMERON

FEBRUARY 9 2013 WORLDWIDE FRAUD OPERATION
We have the same problem in the UK and the majority of people are in oblivion to it over here it’s call the Court of protection sounds pretty impressive don’t it. Run by a bunch of crooks. You cannot afford to even have a major accident and demand justice because your solicitor will claim you do not have? the mental capacity to make that decision, my own mother has had capacity throughout her 12 year ordeal but yet they have stolen, mal administered and committed fraud against her to a minimum figure not less than £250,000. Additionally as in this video me the son whom wants to present and publish the evidence surrounding this has been by a fraudulent court and judge found in contempt and sentenced to prison?

FEBRUARY 8 2013 LONDON CIVIL APPEALS
ROYAL COURTS
Read [16:29:39] PamFax: Hello, Your fax to FAO M LAYTON & Mrs DOWNS case 2013/0087 (+44 20 79477679) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT to LONDON CIVIL APPEALS OFFICE & also sent to Manchester courts & American service provider of the website THE WEB/NETWORK SOLUTIONS.

FEBRUARY 8 2013 opg.me.uk 123REG LETTER
Read Hello, Your fax to www.opg.me.uk 123-reg LEGAL (+44 870 9126612) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT 12.02.2013. Hello, Your fax to fao LEGAL TEAM 123 reg www.opg.me.uk (+44 845 8590021) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT 12.02.2013

FEBRUARY 7 2013 JOIN FUDICIARY WATCH.ORG
JOIN on facebook & checkout http://www.uglyjudge.com/stop-unethical-lawyers-judges-and-family-members-by-capping-fees/

FEBRUARY 7 2013 ANOTHER VICTIM WRITES
TO AMERICAN SERVICE PROVIDER OF WEBSITE
I Leonard Lawrence Pilot have also been following the case of Mr Michael Clarke. Mike Clarke is not alone Google Leonard Lawrence Pilot
How the Mental Health Act is used in the United Kingdom Family Courts and the Court of Protection.
a) Mr. Lawrence discovered that BP Collins Solicitors Gerrards Cross, Bucks, had been asked to hide assets from the court. Thereafter, BP Collins Solicitors and Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk were able to have Leonard Lawrence certified by Dr Royds, Cygnet Health Care, Godden Green, under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical. The Official Solicitors office was also able to have Leonard Lawrence certified by Dr Royds under Part V11 Mental Health Act 1983 without a medical.
b) Helen Clift Official Solicitors office, BP Collins Solicitors and Mr. Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bench Walk, aided by Nicholas Allen 29 Bedford Row, Sarah Benfield Ratcliffe Duce and Gammer Solicitors and Caroline Wilbourne 1 Garden Court Chambers by not disclosing Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3 were then able to generate substantial legal fees and asset strip Leonard Lawrence.
c) This practice continues today, the case of Lee Gilliland Bristol also demonstrates this.
d)No comfort can be gained when in can be shown that Mehrunnisa Lanai, Director of Inclusion, Solicitors Regulatory Authority had also failed to disclose to a senior police officer at Devon & Cornwall Police copies of the three Court of Protection Medical Certificates CP3 that the Solicitors Regulatory Authority held and the findings of the SRA investigating solicitor Ms Anderson who directs liability at the Official Solicitor and barristers for Leonard Lawrence non registration with the Court of Protection.
The Law Society investigating Solicitor report disclosed in 2011 The Official Solicitor was acting as Mr. Lawrence’s representative and Guardian and as such had the greater duty to protect him. I consider that the majority of the steps that Mr. Lawrence feel should have been taken to protect him should have been taken by the Official Solicitor rather than the firm including the decision and action necessary to invoke the Court of Protection.
Counsel advice on Leonard Lawrence, funded by the Legal Services Commission Special Cases Unit, Mr. Lawrence had the protection of the Official Solicitor but was not registered as a protected party should be in the Court of Protection. Left financially vulnerable at both point of trial and order of sale.
Disclosure of Leonard Lawrence case file by May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor on the 20 March 2012 revealed many pages having been torn out. 20 December 2012 May Maughan refuse to discuss why these pages have been remove prior to her sending the files to Simpson Millar Solicitors. The remaining case files identified that during the period Leonard Lawrence had been under the jurisdiction of the Official Solicitor Ms Helen Clift knew on at least four occasions it was necessary to have involve the Court of Protection.
Google Leonard Lawrence Pilot http://www.ministryofjustice.info/leonard-lawrence-pilot-and-the-official-s..http://www.ministryofjustice.info/leonard-lawrence-pilot-and-the-official-s... Leonard Lawrence Pilot

FEBRUARY 6 2013
Extension time allowed by court of appeal is no more than 5 days to sort out bundles of documents when we have not received the relevant transcripts & notice they will not refer to the case as it is labelled
CLARKE v COURT OF PROTECTION.

FEBRUARY 6 2013 FELLOW VICTIM WRITES
Subject: Pannone Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:32:52 +0100 From: Peter Hofschröer To: abuse@web.com, NWheeler@web.com CC: mike@opg.me Dear Sir or Madam, The attached letter send to you by British lawyers Pannone, which I have seen posted on the internet, causes me considerable concern. I have been following the case of Mr Michael Clarke and his disabled mother, for whom he is the carer, for some years now. We have a common interest, as we are both full time carers for our disabled mothers, both of whom are the subjects of horrific abuse and crime undertaken by corrupt officials. lawyers and politicians in Britain. So that you understand the situation and the legal background to this case, may I outline a few facts for your information? In Britain, there is a judicial body known as the Court of Protection. This court decides about making provisions for people deemed to lack mental capacity. Most courts on this planet are open to the public. In most countries on this planet, the assessments of two qualified psychiatrists are required to determine capacity. This is not the case in Britain. In Britain, the Court of Protection meets in secret, the accused do not have to be told about this and it is deemed sufficient for one unqualified social worker to claim they think a person might be incapacitated for an attorney to be appointed to run the finances of a wealthy, old person. What then happens is that the lawyer making the claim for incapacity, who is usually acting on behalf of relatives or other persons determined to seize those assets, can then make unlimited charges against the estate, while the relatives pick up the balance, leaving a person who may well have capacity, stripped of their assets. There is also no limit on the amount the court may charge in costs. All in all, a very lucrative business for the perpetrators, while the victims, who are deemed incapacitated, are stripped of their assets. One of the judges running this dubious court is a certain Denzil Lush. He is known in the legal profession as Denzil Slush Fund. One, and just one British Member of Parliament has spoken out against this legalised crime. His name is John Hemming. You my like to google his name. Mr Clarke is a determined man. He has given up his life, business and career to care for his mother. He is doing his best to stop her being robbed blind by the corrupt British authorities. In doing so, he has made many enemies. While a British court may have decided his statements of fact made in the public domain are defamatory, he is merely exercising his freedom of speech. Let us also not forgot that the British libel laws are notorious the world over and are designed to stop the victims of the rich and powerful from complaining about being victims of the crime they commit. This is precisely what is going on here. In 1776, America took a stand against British tyranny and gained its freedom. This case is an opportunity for you to make that expression of freedom again. Please do so here. Yours faithfully, Peter Hofschröer P.S. If you want to read about my mother's case, please google: "The Abuse of Grandma B"

FEBRUARY 5 2013 PANNNONE SHUT DOMAIN www.opg.me.uk
Dear Mike, Thank you for contacting 123-reg on the 5th February 2013. We have checked and your domain is currently suspended for legal reasons. For further queries regarding this issue, please send an email to our legal department: legal@webfusion.com If we can be of any further help with regard to this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact us. Kind Regards Bogdan 123-reg

FEBRUARY 5 2013 PANNNONE ATTEMPT TO SHUT WEBSITE
read Pannone letter to website service provider in AMERICA requesting the website shut down. Registrant Network Solutions LLC., receive the attached court documents and/or related notice. Please review the documents and respond to us within 5 days confirming that you have removed the offending material as directed by the order. Please respond by Feb 9, 2013 with your removal confirmation otherwise we will be forced to disable your website site in compliance with the documents. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and please contact the undersigned with any questions. Tom Lam Manager: Abuse, Fraud and Executive Escalations Register.com, a Web.com service Maritime Center, 2nd Floor, 1505 Barrington St | Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5 Canada Office/FAX: (902) 749-2746

FEBRUARY 4@1300 2013 STATEMENT OF APPEAL FAXED
Appeal statement faxed to court today. Receipt - Hello, Your fax to APPEAL APPLICATION case 2MA90015 (+44 161 2405050) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

FEBRUARY 4@0800 2013 JUDGE SUMMONED TO COUNTY COURT
Summons issued in county court to Judge MARK PELLING QC for failure to pay interim payment requested off his debt of £1,000,000 for his failure in his duty to protect my common law rights in wilful neglect of his duty of care becoming dishevelled of his corporate shield. IS THIS WHAT THE JUDGE TRYED TO PREVENT BY THIS MORNINGS DAWN RAID ON MRS CLARKES BUSINESS RESIDENCE!

FEBRUARY 4 2013@0400 POLICE ARRIVE MOB HANDED
At mums property at 4am this morning stealing keys to enter rooms without a search warrant asking questions of tenants clearly distressed. The matter was recorded on video and will be available shortly. The police would not clearly show to the occupant a warrant that was asked for. Today mum will be filing harassment complaints upon the police for disruption to her business. The police have again breached the trespass signs of removal of right of access where a new bill/invoice will be drawn up for an additional £5000 adding to the existing bill lodged with Blackpool Police for £10,000. Break in House 1 & 2 videos below & 3 days ago police sitting outside...
VIDEOS REMOVED - REASON UNKNOWN - WILL BE RE-INSTATED SOON..

FEBRUARY 02 2013 APPEAL STATEMENT
Appeal statement to be updated.

JANUARY 31 2013 Transcript reply from PANNONE
Read the transcript reply with a denial of our accusation of trying to silence me and pervert the course of justice in their bogus court committal order to prison.

JANUARY 30 2013 FAX to PANNONE
Read [11:27:43] PamFax: Hello, Your fax to HUGH JONES EMMA HOLT PAUL JONSON (+44 161 9094444) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

JANUARY 30 2013 FAX TO CIVIL APPEALS OFFICE
Read fax TO civil appeals AND fax no update plus proof of postage. Hello, Your fax to Mr M LAYTON Case progression MANAGER B6 section (+44 20 79476810) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT.

JANUARY 30 2013 BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP NEWSLETTER
Read IT where our case is now featured highlighted in yellow to demonstrate the corruption.

JANUARY 30 2013 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST
From: Michael 29 December 2012 Dear High Court of the Justiciary,
Dear Honourable Sirs
When a person has requested a jury court of his peers to judge a matter he deems as a conflict of interests where 'the bar' maybe judging 'the bar', and that this request has been turned down, is such a person being denied due process & under Article 6 of Human Rights access to a fair and impartial hearing.
If that person subsequently deems that the order issued by that judge 'flawed' and he subsequently makes a statutory declaration, declaring it void, is the order VOID??
Yours faithfully,
Mr Clarke Link to this From: Michael
30 January 2013 FOLLOW UP REQUEST NOT ANSWERED BY LAW BY 29/01/2013
Dear High Court of the Justiciary,
Dear Honourable Sirs
When a person has requested a jury court of his peers to judge a matter he deems as a conflict of interests where 'the bar' maybe judging 'the bar', and that this request has been turned down, is such a person being denied due process & under Article 6 of Human Rights access to a fair and impartial hearing.
If that person subsequently deems that the order issued by that judge 'flawed' and he subsequently makes a statutory declaration, declaring it void, is the order VOID??
Yours faithfully,
Mr Clarke

JANUARY 29 2013 CIVIL APPEALS EXTENSION OF TIME
EXTENSION of time requested to civil appeals office faxed today and emailed. Receipt - Hello Mike of the family Clarke , Your fax to Mr M LAYTON Case progression MANAGER B6 section (+44 20 79476810) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT. More information is available in the PamFax Portal 29/01/2013 Regards, PamFax Team @ Scendix

JANUARY 29 2013 LEGAL REPRESENTATION DENIED
In an effort to get legal representation and legal aid ie barrister representation on these matters an email to a solicitor gained this reply today....
Dear Mike
Thank you for the documentation supplied. I know you will not be happy when I say to you that much of the documentation would not have any relevance In deciding the case. Indeed I cannot actually see any coherent argument put fotward by you or those advising you. I can say that you would not be able to apply for public funding or at least any application would fail the merits test. In any event the matter involves action with Pannones and we are part of their “Connect to Law “ network and would not wish to become involved In a matter of this nature against them. I have noted with interest your invoice to the judge and ufortunately have to say that this shows how little you and anyone assisting understands in these matters. I am sorry to write to anyone in these terms but I often have to tell people unpleasant truths and unfortuneately this is one of those occasions. I cannot legally advise you in these matters nor can I engage in any further correspondence or communication with you. Please accept my apologies for the typing errors.
Regards
John xxxxx

JANUARY 28 2013 email to PANNONE
Read requests.

JANUARY 28 2013 INVOICE TO JUDGE PELLING QC
INVOICE for £1,000,000 sent to Judge PELLING QC with interim payment request for £500 immediate. Delivery receipt by fax; Hello Mike Clarke . . ., Your fax to FAO PELLING QC URGENT CASE 2MA90015 (+44 161 2405050) was SUCCESSFULLY SENT. More information is available in the Portal at https://?????? Regards, Fax Team @ Scendix

JANUARY 28 2013 CORRUPTION ARTICLE BY PANNONE
Read

JANUARY 27@1pm 2013 POLICE ARRIVE at HOUSE
Upon leaving the property one of our friends was approached upon the drive by police, our friend turned and said have you read the sign that states IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS removal, to which the policeman then duely moved back onto the public pavement and said "do you live here?" Our friend said, "I am not obliged to answer any of your questions" to which the policeman got back in his vehicle and after a brief stint on his radio, left.

JANUARY 25 2013 MORE OBSTRUCTION BY COURT STAFF LISTEN to the phonecall to court staff and how you cannot seem to get consistency where sometime you get the recordings and other times they refuse?

JANUARY 21 2013 OBSTRUCTION BY COURT STAFF
As the hours and days countdown with regard to any actions of appeal time etc Court staff continue to assist with the overall corruption and fraud going on by giving out differing information each day in regard to reqests for the order, the judgement and CD copy of digital hearings for our common law defence team.
FAXED DELIVERY to 01612405000 Case No. 2MA90015 2pm 14.1.2013
Manager of Specialist Listings, Manchester Mercantile
Dear Ms Rose Shaw
Despite your statement in your email dated the 17th January 2013 you are aware that Mr Michael Clarke, as he has already requested is entitled to a free of charge copy of any hand written record of the proceedings and a CD copy of the digital audio recording of the hearing during which Pannone solicitors successfully obtained a committal order against him.
In cases connected with the Court of Protection and its national network of probate practitioners evidence shows that an individual or individuals within HM Courts Service can hinder the course of justice by obstructing the disclosure of the recordings of those court proceeding’s when it is known there are time limits to appeal the decision.
1. You are yet again advised you must provide to Mr Michael Clarke without any further delay CD copy of the digital audio recording of the hearing as fixed by the court clerk.
2. If you are not going to supply a copy you need to obtain an order from “His Honour Judge” Pelling denying disclosure along with his reasons.
3. We further require two sealed copies of the judgement, as these have still not arrived.
4. We also require copy of the judge’s notes.
5. We also require signed copy of the arrest warrant.
6. We understand there was also a stenographer present at the hearing we also require this record of the proceedings.
Regards By: Michael of the family Clarke
Caution:- You do not have to say anything, but it may harm your defence if you fail to mention, when questioned, something which you may later rely on in court. Anything you do say, may be given in evidence.

JANUARY 20 2013 Email to REVIEW TEAM of PHSO
Dear Head of the Review Team, Suzannah Beazley
Is there any update from the email below please.
My legal fiction has been sentenced to prison in a court that had no jurisdiction.
My mother and I have had to flee for our safety.
All details are published on our website. Mike & Ann of the family Clarke www.opg.me ----- Original Message ----- From: Complaintsphso To: 'Mike Clarke' Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:42 AM Subject: Your complaint about PHSO PROTECT - SENSITIVE Dear Mr Clarke Thank you for your email of 13 December 2012. I can advise that your request for review is awaiting consideration by the Head of the Review Team, Suzannah Beazley. We will respond as soon as possible to let you know whether we intend to take your case forward. I apologise for the delay in responding to you. Yours sincerely Laura Lansiquot-Piper Business Support Officer to the Review Team Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman 19th Floor Millbank Tower Millbank London SW1P 4QP

JANUARY 20 2013 JUDGE of the COURT of PROTECTION
PELLING QC appears to be a judge of the court of protection and so should be well aware of the Mental Capacity Act Section 5, it clearly demonstrates the entire bias in this matter where a fair and impartial hearing is impossible to achieve without a jury of peers and having requested such and been denied NULLIFIES the order that is VOID. To enlarge this item right click on it and click on zoom in.

JANUARY 19 2013 APPELLANT NOTICES SERVED
JONES appellant receipt. LUSH appellant receipt. Appellant notices served for Court of APPEAL LONDON for fraud.

JANUARY 19 2013 ORDER OF COMMITTAL
Read order.

JANUARY 18 2013 HIGH COURT TRANSCRIPTS
The high court was requested today to release the CD copy of the transcript of the hearing and the reply was that you need to tell us which transcriber you are using to which we said no we have our own programs to do this ourselves and they then said oh well in that case you need to write a letter in to be put before the judge to see if he will release you a copy?? WHY is that I wonder? Is it just more effort to pervert the course of justice?? No wonder they instruct everyone to turn off their phones or any recording devices? What are they afraid of? Read our faxed request sent to court today. Further emails; Dear Sir Can you please explain why I cannot have a copy because in 2 previous hearings I have had cd copies sent to my home no problem and no charge so what has changed Mr Clarke ----- Original Message ----- From: Manchester QB To: 'Mike Clarke' Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:56 PM Subject: RE: Transcript Dear Sir If you wish to obtain a transcript of the hearing you will need to complete the appropriate form which is an EX 107, available on the HMCTS web page. Please note the transcript can only be done by one of the approved list of transcibers. A list is available on the HMCTS web page. The court is unable to send a CD of the hearing direct to the parties. Rose Shaw Queens Bench Listing Officer Manchester Civil Justice Centre 1 Bridge Street West Manchester M60 9DJ 0161 240 5305 email: Mercantile claims: - manchester.mercantile@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk QB Claims:- manchester.qb@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk TCC Claims:- manchester.tcc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Mike Clarke [mailto:mike@rake.net] Sent: 17 January 2013 13:23 To: Manchester QB Subject: Transcript Dear Sirs We request with some urgency the transcript CD copy of the court hearing on the 14th January 2013 with PELLING QC as Judge ref case 2MA90015 This is very urgent matter. Please send to: Mike of the family Clarke 31 Cherry Tree Rd Blackpool FY4 4NS

JANUARY 17 2013 JOURNALIST GAGGED
A journalist Jerome Taylor from the Independent was restricted from writing about a case on Monday 14 January 2013 and served documents an hour before the hearing.
I notice he made the following statement on his twitter: 'Nice. Just received a reporting restriction notice for Court of Protection case 1hr before court was due to sit. #stilllongwaytogo''.
There were two known cases arising out of Court of Protection issues on Monday
1. The one that involved Mike Clarke (See Mike OPG website) was in the High Court in Manchester
2. The one in the High Court, Queens Bench Division, London involving Leonard Lawrence, the Official Solicitor of the Senior Court Alistair Pitbaldo, May Maughan Deputy Official Solicitor and the Court of Protection. The Law Society, Solicitors Regulatory Authority internal report having placed liability at the Official Solicitor for failing to protect Leonard Lawrence. Richard Anelay QC a Deputy High Court Family Judge and Head of Chambers 1 Kings Bench Walk establised in September 2012 that Leonard Lawrence had been a patient subject to the Court of Protection Court in 2004/4/6. Records show that Barrister Dominic Brazil 1 Kings Bech Walk had held a medical certicate issued to protect Leonard Lawrence but did not notify the Court of Protection and then proceeded to asset strip Leonard Lawrence assisted by BP Collins Solicitors and Helen Clift from within the Official Solicitors office who also failed to disclose medical certificates of mental incapacity to the court. (Google Leonard Lawrence Pilot organophosphate poisoning) It is known that May Maughan, Deputy Official Solicitor had been in contact with the Court of Protection prior to the hearing. There was a press release for this case, the press were present for Leonard Lawrence, but were stopped from attend the hearing. The hearing was before Master Yoxall in private Leonard Lawrence Pilot -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A journalist Jerome Taylor from the Independent was restricted from writing about a case on Monday and served documents an hour before the hearing. I notice he made the following statement on his twitter: 'Nice. Just received a reporting restriction notice for Court of Protection case 1hr before court was due to sit. #stilllongwaytogo''. Thanks,

JANUARY 17 2013 HIGH COURT & "PRISON"
Under review

JANUARY 14 2013 HIGH COURT & "PRISON"
NOTICE TO COURT handed to the administrator/"Judge" 2 hours before hearing this document of 7 pages fully outlined the team of common law advocates and their lawful stance. 1 hour before trial my own skeleton 1 page document was handed to the administrator/judge SKELETON case from the man, the human. VOID ORDER DECLARATION being made with a private prosecution to be served upon the Judge shortly after him dismissing my lawful represntation within minutes and leaving the court room refusing to return until my representation had left and then he proceeded his corrupt trial with bent barrister from PANNONE ending with a 3 month PRISON sentence handed down. The man remains at large,

JANUARY 12 2013 APPEAL COURT CLARKEvPROTECTION
Read our appeal now lodged ref no 20130087 in London against the court of protection for fraud naming the master Denzil lush and Hugh Jones of PANNONES LLP.

JANUARY 12 2013
Read At War with the legal profession2.pdf

JANUARY 11 2013 CONTRACT ISSUED TO HEARING
Contract tendered to the administrator 'so called judge'.

JANUARY 11 2013 PANNONEs SKELETON CASE
Scanned document from PANNONE LLP 77 pages of skeleton arguement. ARRIVED at 4pm today by email.

JANUARY 11 2013 RESIGNATION AT PANNONE
Another partner resigns at PANNONE LLP, Andrew Gosnay.

JANUARY 11 2013 APPEAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED
In the London courts Listen to the Phone call to court of appeal in LONDON where the application has been accepted upon our Statement of case. REF NO 20130087 email to Pannone LLPs FAO PANNONES LLPs Hugh Jones Paul Jonson Simon HEAPY
Dear Sirs
We put you hereby on notice that our APPEAL APPLICATION to London courts upon our statement of case; www.opg.me/STATEMENTofCASE4COURTofAPPEAL17122012.doc has now been accepted under reference number 20130087
Mike of the family Clarke

JANUARY 11 2013@8am PROCESS SERVER ARRIVES
Now get this, the process server arrives & is a lovely chap, he is only doing is job, so it aint any fault of he's but in the process of trying to recruit representation I am told that I must have all the documents to recruit emergency barrister representation and so on the 2 January I wrote to PANNONEs head of resolutions email, PAUL JONSON and said, "Dear Sir Please find attached a stat dec sent to the court. We ask what other documents are we currently waiting for you to serve today and when can we expect all documents to have been deemed served by you Mike Clarke" NO REPLY... on the 4th JANUARY I wrote again by email to PAUL JONSON copied to EMMA HOLT and said, "THIS IS THE SECOND REQUEST OR ARE YOU JUST INTENT TO BE YOUR USUAL SELF AND SERVE DOCUMENTS ON THE LAST MINUTE" NO REPLY... again!!! but here we are on the last day before the weekend they serve the final documents before trial on Monday??? Would you say they are trying to pervert the course of justice one way or another???? Oh and by the way these are their scanned costs attached by email this morning of £36,095.80!!! Such a lovely morning as well... All have a nice weekend! WE WILL.Costs for pannone
FACEBOOK OBSERVER Roy Jenkins Michael they can't do that as i found out, the court manager informed me "any documents either you or the defendants intend to use in court must be served no later than 7 days before the hearing date as required by law" further if they drop documents after the 7 lay limit you can refuse to have them used at the hearing. This is typical Bradford and Bingley shit. They handed both myself and the judge a bundle of 32 documents in the court room itself. Even Lord Justice Ward commented this disturbed him. Write and tell them you refuse to accept them. FAO PANNONE PAUL JONSON & EMMA HOLT Dear Sirs documents just arrived this morning in connection with court case on Monday 14th January 2013 we are led to believe must be served 7 days before the hearing and therefore cannot now be relied upon. Mike of the family clarke
The documents are being returned unopened by courier

JANUARY 9 2013 CORRUPTION
The court system is corrupt
In times of war people do desperate things to survive. In times of peace desperation seems an unwarranted claim on which to justify extreme actions but this is precisely the claim being laid at the feet of the judiciary now for actions being considered against them. Too many people have fallen victim to the corruption within the court system for it to be allowed to continue it is only a matter of time before a critical mass will be able to bring about a backlash, that backlash has started albeit still early days but with every passing day an ever increasing number of disillusioned and angry people are waking up to just how corrupt the judicial process has become from the magistrates courts and their cosy relationship with councils and corporations through to the secretive courts of protection and the family courts which destroy families and steal property.
People in search of a solution to this endemic corruption have at last found a direction within the lawful rebellion movement, across the country the lawful rebellion movement is building momentum its target is the judiciary which has with its collusion with colleagues in the legal profession the political establishment the banking fraternity & the hierarchy of the police force created a system of control that has systematically undermined our constitution the rule of law & our inalienable rights.
The Lawful Rebellion Movement is both peaceful and lawful the dove in our logo is the symbol of peaceful intent but it is a fool that thinks we lack the determination or the ability to think about our aims regardless of the forces rained against us, because ultimately we are the many and judiciary are the few.
It is now only a matter of time before retribution will be at hand for those whom think they can act like criminals in our courts with impunity our leaders are emerging and our numbers grow daily and we have you in our sights.
The Judiciary are at the fore front of the attacks on our freedoms have much to answer for. It is they that steam roller over our rights, ignore our constitution and turn a blind eye to the corruption in their ranks they imagine that if they have the strong arm of the law to protect them and they do for now, but that changes are underway and this protection will not last.
Volunteers are being signed up currently to serve as our own peace keepers whose duty it will be to arrest those whom will be summoned to appear before our courts to face our justice and there will be no hiding behind the skirts of the corrupt senior police network then, because their actions to protect you will expose to us who they are and we as keen to put them behind bars as we are to inflict our justice upon you.
We acknowledge that there are good judges but where are they, they do not appear in courts labelled good judges or bad judge, unless we are entitled to believe that each judge we encounter is corrupt until such time as the corruption is exposed and removed.
The corruption is self-evident by the perversity of judgements of which a jury is unlikely to be hood winked corruption in the judicial process represents the high crime of treason for which we will extract the utmost penalty be certain therefore in your mind that the pay you receive for your corruption is worth it because payback will carry a very high price for it.
The judicial racket that is allowing to reward their colleagues in the legal profession of absurdly high fees makes the use of the words of corruption and criminal quite tame and inappropriate bearing in mind that the consequence of these rewards where people lose their businesses and their homes and are often made bankrupt or commit suicide.
There is no future in brown envelope judiciary. The writing is on the court room wall.
Worse than the self-serving money making racket of costs is your blatant refusal to recognise our common law rights and the provisions of our constitution that protect us from Tyranny your denial of our rights places us at risk of incursions into our lives which our for fathers died to protect and at which we defending now.
Desperation may seem to stronger word when there is no war but in our current eyes we are indeed at war with a judiciary when it plays the role of TYRANT. The subversion of our constitution and the denial of our common law rights are the hallmark of today’s judiciary and you have failed in your duty to defend protect and to serve the people and soon it will be time for the chickens to come home to roost.
Be mindful of your judgements every day because these will be the evidence brought against you there will be no behind the doors arrangement and no quiet words in ears to assist, you will be exposed to the raw elements of truth and truth can hurt.
Lawful rebellion is a movement that gives direction to the frustration and anger throughout the UK with an array of grievances across the full spectrum.
Mike of the family Clarke

JANUARY 8 2013 Invoice to M6 POLICE for £10,000
Invoice to M6 POLICE for £10,000 for unlawful arrest kidnap and 6 hours detention.

JANUARY 08 2013 £10,000 INVOICE TO BLACKPOOL POLICE
Invoice for £10,000 sent to Blackpool Police for trespass.

JANUARY 7 2013 FORCE & THE LAW
"Any attempt at holding the Claimant liable to statute will be construed as force and shall be void. Any demand for compliance will be construed as force and shall be void". check Theresa May@2.32 seconds in & conformation that in this country we police by consent A PRELIMINARY NOTICE BEFORE CLAIM will be Served by Special delivery upon the Chief Constable of the relevant Constabulary.
That document along with included evidence, establishes as a legal argument, the following:
that the UK is policed by consent; and
that the bearer does not consent to be policed; and
that there is no business between the parties at that point; and
that the term ‘force’ has been defined; and
that the term ‘ultra vires’ has been defined; and
that the term ‘void order’ has been defined; and
that the document contains a valid and legally enforceable contract; and
that penalties apply should the constabulary use statutory rules or force against the bearer and
that the bearer has withdrawn any implied right of access to their person and property; and
that the constabulary appears to be criminally complicit according to the Rome Statute of the Criminal Court, Article 25(3); and
that an opportunity to discuss matters outside of court has been offered; and
that the constabulary is required to acknowledge receipt of the Preliminary Notice within 21 days of receiving it.

JANUARY 7 2013 THE REALITY OF THE UK TODAY

JANUARY 6 2013 AND THEY SAY CRIME DOES NOT PAY

STEVEN RICHARD GRANT DOB 18/11/1959 a company secratary from 2001 for PANNONE LLP 3 Kingston Avenue, Didsbury, Manchester M20 2SP alongside a DIRECTOR of PANNONE LLP's, also from 2001,

CHARLES SOREN ROBERT TATTAM D.o.B. 14.07.1953, of "The Ranch House", Gore Lane, Alderley Edge, Cheshire. SK9 7SF.

JANUARY 4 2013 PANNONE LLP Accounts
Read 2001 directors / Read 2001 accounts / Read 2002 / Read 2003 / Read 2004 / Read 2005 / Read 2006 / Read 2007 / Read 2008 / Read 2009 / Read 2010 / Read 2011

JANUARY 4 2013 UNLAWFUL ARREST BILL TO POLICE
Read a letter toM6police04012013.pdf

JANUARY 4 2013 TRESPASS BILL TO POLICE
Read a letter toBlackpoolpolice04012013.pdf

JANUARY 2 2013 STAT DEC to 2MA90015
Read statdec02012013.pdf sent to Court for hearing 2MA90015@10.30am 14.01.2013

JANUARY 2 2013
Read appeal court request.

JANUARY 2 2013
Read a reply from the land registry landregistryreply21122012.pdf. And our reply ....
Dear Rosalind Taylor
Ref Attached letter
We wish to remind you that as a corporate employee you have a ‘duty of care’. Failure to perform on that duty leaves you open to neglection which under common law is a TORT.
Neglection of the duty of care providing a tort removes your personal private corporate shield. You can be sued personally under common law by a ‘Commercial lien/claim’.
Which mark my words, I will serve upon you if you have not dotted the ‘i’s and crossed the ‘t’s.
I have explained and provided proof to you of my position of my mother’s living will executorship that bestows upon me ultimate power to act in her best interests.
For example the solicitor PANNONEs Hugh Jones has placed upon the register a UNI lateral Notice and we submit to you that he has no court order to do just that.
He has an order to place a charge for a set amount of fees, so why have you allowed him to place what is a unilateral notice when he has no authority to do so.
Please explain what exactly you have done. Mike ANN CLARKE

JANUARY 1 2013 Order from Judge Stewart
Read orderjudgestewart28122012.pdf

JANUARY 1 2013 Copy of Arrest Warrant
Arrest Warrant 17th December 2012

JANUARY 1 2013

DECEMBER 31 2012
Read about article 6 of the european human rights convention and the entitlement to a fair and impartial hearing.

DECEMBER 31 2012 ARTICLE ON CONSENT
Read an article on CONSENT
&
Abuse of Judicial Power
There have been cases reported of judges who have threatened to jail lienors for "contempt of court" if they do not "voluntarily" lift their liens. In two cases, the judges actually carried out their threat. Such legal coercion on their part is almost certainly unlawful. Nonetheless, some judges will use that tactic, if they think the lienor is vulnerable. To deal with this problem, it is helpful to remember the following:
1. The only reason the judge is making that threat is because he has no lawful means of extinguishing the lien. It is a move of fear and desperation.
2. Assess your own vulnerability. Will a few days in jail seriously affect your life? If not, you have some psychological leverage. Otherwise, the judge has a lever over you.
3. If your lien does end up in court, you may want to have a lawyer or a talented pro se with you, so that somebody can file an effective writ of habeas corpus, if necessary. Also, you may wish to learn how to effectively defend yourself against contempt charges.
4. If the judge actually does imprison you on a bogus contempt charge, he becomes personally liable for civil damages, criminal sanctions, and a commercial lien. The judge is taking a risk by violating your rights. He is probably hoping that you don’t know how to pursue an effective legal remedy. In many ways, this is a game of "chicken."

DECEMBER 29 2012 PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS
In view of the dire circumstances we find ourselves in and due consultations going on today with advisers under common law, it is highly likely we will be issuing private criminal prosecutions next week against PANNONE LLPs, all 50 partners and also the police at Watlington Police Station for Unlawful civil arrest against their oath of office, without my consent, & The Police at Blackpool for trespass, of fees of £5000 per each officer attending 2 off on 2 visits, breaking and entering and breach of the peace causing business damage and loss. We are legally informed that if criminal charges are filed against PANNONES, under court rules all civil liability actions are shelved until criminal matters are dealt with, we are also legally informed that PANNONEs are breaking the No1 court rule of negotiation by mediation before any court matter proceeds and their blank refusal to do this.

DECEMBER 28@10am 2012 ARRESTED on the M6@Birmingham
On a civil arrest warrant like someone who was wanted for terrorism where 3 police cars hemmed us in on the motorway to force me to the side exit, causing alarm and distress to my mother! Transported from there to Manchester Courts and then released to a later date to face a breach of a court order and so contempt of court. AMAZING - the world we now live in... Contempt of court is wholly a common law misdemeanor where a jury of your peers is required to judge!! The police being placed on the oath of office ignored the fact they had no jurisdiction to arrest on a civil warrant without my consent!! Who is breaking the laws today? us or them? Listen to the ARREST

DECEMBER 27 2012 To the manor born..

to the manor born, me, mum and James spent Christmas with friends in a manor house down south where some common law schooling took place on OATHS of Office, Failure to Perform upon a 'Duty of Care' & negligence & thus the removal of the corporate shield, Contempt of Court, Administrative Courts without consent and more..

DECEMBER 26 2012 RESPONSE to POLICE/COURT
Read our response

DECEMBER 24 2012 Merry Christmas to ALL
Counter response to the so called arrest warrant(unlawful) to be submitted to the courts and the police very soon...

DECEMBER 22 2012 Court case 2MA91155
Court case 2MA91155 the latest gem from Pannone LLPs.

DECEMBER 19 2012 @6am in the morning
Police arrive again, mob handed at 31 Cherry Tree Rd to arrest the legal fiction 'Michael Clarke' only to not find it. It being the birth certificate/corporation, which is there of course. Anyway, they get out of bed all paying tenants of the property to interrogate each and every one. Not content are Pannones Partner's to harass little old ladies out £250,000 they now harass innocent tenants disrupting what little business income the little old lady has left. Meanwhile back at 'The Ranch House' all are nice and snug, tucked up in their beds probably sound asleep dreaming about christmas and what daddy might buy for them out of his ill gotten gains of association with the criminally fraudulent, negligent mal administrator HUGH JONES & his posse of bandits of the old and infirm.

DECEMBER 18 2012 10:30am POLICE ARRIVE
At the home of the family Clarke. They read the Notices displayed at the entrances of REMOVAL of IMPLIED RIGHT of access and acknowledge this. Being recorded as they are banging at the door in a threatening and manacing fashion stating they are the POLICE and are going to break down the door if not answered(ILLEGAL). There is initially one younger officer then joined by a second older officer whom seemed more professional in his approach. The door is opened upon which they barge in(ILLEGAL). They state they are looking for the legal fiction, corporation, birth certificate, 'MICHAEL CLARKE'. They cause distraction in order to 'break & enter' property where they are told belongs to tenants by removing screws from locks(ILLEGAL). After searching the property, attics, garden, garage and all, causing alarm and distress and questioning to mum(aged 71) they decide to leave, stating they will be back, day and night. They claimed to have an arrest warrant from PANNONE LLPs which was not properly shown to the occupants. Mum was subsequently moved to a safe address in order to enjoy her christmas but obviously that not being within her own home as intended.
Now would Pannone LLPs like to receive the same treatment over christmas?
We would now invite the police to show/scan and send their copy of the so called arrest warrant by email to mikeofthefamilyclarke@facebook.com in order that we may check its validity in legal/lawful terms, where it must display a judge signature so that this person is going to take responsibility, a seal of the court initialising such and that a valid warrant must have the name of the judge clearly identified. To recap .. sealed, signed and clearly identified authorisation! We do not believe that this is the case here.

DECEMBER 17 2012
Read the STATEMENT of CASE so far for the COURT of APPEAL17122012.pdf FAXED to the court of appeal and emailed to
HELEN GRANT MP
GORDON MARSDEN MP
DUNCAN HAMES MP
HUGH JONES
PAUL JONSON
ALICE CORAL parliamentary ombudsman ref EN 135765

DECEMBER 17 2012 Statutory Declarations of VOID ORDERS
statdecCASE10370284on12122012.pdf declaring VOID ORDER.
statdecCASE2MA90015on03122012.pdf declaring VOID ORDER.
Recorded delivery receipts

DECEMBER 17 2012 VOID COURTS & ORDERS
Read more information on void orders and void courts. 1961:
In MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd. [1961] Lord Denning confirmed that:
(i) a void order is automatically void without more ado;
(ii) a void order does not have to be set aside by a Court to render it void although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have the Court set the void order aside;
(iii) a void order is incurably void and all proceedings based on the void order/invalid claim are also void.
Read about any actions taken on a void order are trespass and can have claims laid against those whom act upon void orders! Read the PDF of those using a VOID order will be committing the act of TRESPASS.

DECEMBER 16 2012 Sunday A day OFF

DECEMBER 15 2012 Reply to LAND REGISTRY
FAXED EMAILED & RECORDED DELIVERY Read a reply to the land registry outlining legal lawful facts.

DECEMBER 15 2012 Land Registry Reply
Read the refusal of the land registry to remove the unilateral notice of charges upon my mothers property after receiving an application from her to cancel it. Our follow up reply to be posted here shortly... (todays task)

DECEMBER 14 2012 JOIN LAWFUL REBELLION
In persuit of JUSTICE .. Affidavit 1 send recorded delivery to The Queen at Buckingham Palace & wait 40 days affidavit 2 send recorded delivery to The Queen at Buckingham Palace, its official you are in Lawful Rebellion and a FREEMAN of the land.

DECEMBER 14 2012
Read THE PDF COPY or the actual email to court of appeals here. JACKSON states the jurisdiction of the court of protection has ended in this matter. Filed by FAX & by EMAIL & by RECORDED DELIVERY all documents back to supreme court of appeal. Its all like a game of tennis being passed backwards and forwards, pillar to post, nothing new in this saga.

DECEMBER 13 2012
Read pdf an email to ADMINISTRATOR JACKSON on how to proceed in view of the impass. Actual email

DECEMBER 13 2012
Read an email arrived this morning in connection with a request to be involved in the Public Guardian review.

DECEMBER 13 2012 Reply from the appeals for Supreme Court
Read the reply from the Appeals office of the Supreme denying access to the Supreme and moving us back to Jackson for reconsideration.

ONGOING CURRENT INVESTIGATION 13.12.2012
Of Fabien / Masonic links between Pannone LLPs in-particular HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES and the 3 Judges LUSH, FOSKETT & JACKSON are active and on-going to discover the bias that is clearly operating here and the obvious result of corruption in attempts to restrict access to fair and impartial hearings or Court de Jures (Jury Courts) with repressed access to representation and denial of due process alongside refusal to full disclosure clearly showing the end result of BIAS & CORRUPTION in favour of the obvious beneficiaries, THE JUDICIARY or "BAR". The swearing of allegience to each other, of the brethren, is a clear contradiction of the positions they treaonously take by force and kid us into belief of their oath of office and allegience to the Queen.
FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

LUSH PROFILE
Senior Judge Denzil Anton Lush 18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants Recreations supporting Plymouth Argyle FC, collecting commemorative pottery
Career admitted slr England and Wales 1978, slr and NP Scotland 1993; ptnr Anstey Sargent & Probert Slrs Exeter 1985-95; Court of Protection: master 1996-2007, sr judge 2007-; memb Master of the Rolls' Working Pty on Structured Settlements 2002; former memb: Mental Health and Disability Ctee Law Soc, Steering Gp on Advance Directives BMA; pt/t chm Social Security Appeals Tbnls 1994-96, judicial memb Soc of Tst and Estate Practitioners (STEP) 1996-; patron Slrs for the Elderly 2002-; tstee Pan-European Orgn of Personal Injury Lawyers (PEOPIL) Fndn 2004-06; Geoffrey Shindler Award for Outstanding Contrib to the Profession STEP Private Client Awards 2009; FRSM 2001

JACKSON PROFILE
Sir Peter Arthur Brian Jackson (born 9 December 1955), styled The Hon. Mr Justice Peter Jackson, is an English High Court judge, assigned to the Family Division. He was called to the Bar by the Inner Temple in 1978 and became a Queen's Counsel in 2000. He was subsequently appointed as a Recorder in 1998, a Deputy High Court Judge in 2003 and a High Court Judge with effect from 1 October 2010. Chambers & Partners described Jackson as a "master tactician [who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," while Legal 500 called him "one of the most authoritative children silks around.

FOSKETT PROFILE
Royal coat of arms of the United Kingdom High Court Judge Incumbent Assumed office 2007 Personal details Born 16 March 1949 Alma mater King's College London Sir David Robert Foskett (born 19 March 1949), styled The Hon. Mr Justice Foskett, is a British High Court judge. He was educated at Warwick School and at King's College London (LLB, 1970) during which time he also served as President of the Students' Union. He was called to the Bar at Gray's Inn in 1972 and became a bencher there in 1999. He was made a QC in 1991, recorder from 1995-2007, deputy judge of the High Court from 1998-2007, and judge of the High Court of Justice (Queen's Bench Division) since 2007. Foskett is the editor of the leading text on the English law of compromise.

DECEMBER 12 2012 WE ARE ALL threatened WITH PRISON
When the one's that you are blowing the whistle to, are as corrupt as the ones that you are blowing the whistle on, you are simply wasting your breath!

DECEMBER 12 2012
Read documents sent to land registry to remove costs charges by Hugh Jones a statutory declaration of VOID costs order of PETER JACKSON the administrator due to lack of jurisdiction on 24.10.2012. FILED recorded delivery on the COURTS + HUGH JONES + SIMON HEAPY & the LAND REGISTRY. Email sent

DECEMBER 12 2012
Read Affidavit_of_Michael_Clarke_12122012_1212pm.pdf sent to the her majesty the Queen.

DECEMBER 10 2012 SO AM I A NUTTER.pdf
Read

DECEMBER 10 2012 ADVICE
A man after my own heart... Roy Jenkins; Best piece of advice I ever had was around 1991/2 when a crime reporter on a national paper told me "record every conversation you can of these corrupt officer/solicitors and any one else, make three copies and put them in safe places" he also warned me "you are up against the big boys now who will pull more dirty tricks, tell more lies than you will have ever known before, they will use false documentation against your claims, so either go for the long haul or simply give up now". Well i never gave up:)) DITTO

DECEMBER 10 2012
Read a FINAL ATTEMPT at resolution prior to issuing private criminal prosecutions.

DECEMBER 9 2012 www.fulldisclosure.net

Read about fulldisclosure.net

DECEMBER 8 2012
Read about void orders Read the pdf format
Read THE VOID ORDER2.pdf
Read Lewald's Cases.pdf
Read LITIGANT IN PERSON

DECEMBER 8 2012

Read a feature in the LAW Society Gazette about Litigants in Person struggling to obtain justice, no wonder the common law process of commercial liens are going to become popular, written 19th January 2012.Read the pdf format

DECEMBER 7@4pm 2012
Read a letter from Roger Hayes of British Constitution Group as mediator to PANNONES.

DECEMBER 7@4pm 2012
Read a reply to all PANNONE PARTNERS.

DECEMBER 7 2012
Read a letter from fellow campaigner MP Duncan Hames.

DECEMBER 7 2012
Read a faxed emailed and recorded delivery letter to HM Courts re DAVID FOSKITT.

DECEMBER 6 2012 FAO PANNONES LLPs
FAO Pannones ALL LLPs
Ref Commercial Lien – Statutory Declaration – VOID order by Administrator Foskitt
So-called 'Judge' Foskitt should not be referred to as a Judge... he is acting in the capacity of a court administrator... and his judgments are only valid if he acts with the consent of both parties.
I have made it plain that I do not consent to judgments by any member of the judiciary acting on his/her own... and that I will accept only judgments made in accordance with the law... i.e. a common law court and a jury.
I had already sent to the court a refusal of consent on this matter but it was ignored.
I have submitted a statutory declaration stating it was illegal and unlawful and did not show any consent in any way.
The so-called 'order' is void... because it represents a denial of due process of law... and of suspected bias... the Judge being a member of the legal profession... as are Pannones.
Also - I suspect Masonic skulduggery... and I ask for the court administrator to confirm in writing that he is or isn't a Mason - I ask Pannones if any of their partners are of the Masonic Brotherhood - who swears allegiance to each other - and not to the delivery of justice.
I ask also... by what authority the administrator sits in judgment... when not under his oath of office.
I ask also if he is representing the Queen... if so, how can that be if the Queen is no longer sovereign.
I ask how the administrator can sit without a jury... & by what authority does he claim to be able to do so... SHOW ME THE LAW IN RELATION TO THIS!
To educate Pannone's I also state that Magna Carta provides that 'no man shall be imprisoned without judgment of his peers', in accordance with the law' - and if Court Administrator, ‘Foskitt’ does so - I will be taking out a private criminal prosecution against him... for perverting the course of justice, kidnap, unlawful imprisonment and I will be seeking compensation of £1,000,000.
I want to settle this matter by resolution but your head of resolution just keeps on issuing threats!!
We intend to publish the debt in failing to negotiate by resolution.
Mike: Clarke
Relevant correspondence
26.01.2012Affidavit
30.01.2012openletter
10.02.2012toJUDGESHARP
24.4.2012fromFOSKITT
30.4.2012NOTICE
01.05.2012letter1
02.05.2012letter2
05.05.2012lettertocourt

DECEMBER 5 2012
Read an email to MP Helen Grant in connection with a review of the Public Guardian.

DECEMBER 5 2012@01.13
Read a further reply to Paul Jonson.

DECEMBER 4 2012@21.30 REPLY
Read our reply.
Re: ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL VOID ORDER
email reply to paul.jonson@pannone.co.uk
04.12.2012@21.29
ATTACHED STATUTORY DECLARATION
Dear Sir
I cannot comply with your request as it does not make sense. It represents more incompetence on behalf of you & your company.
I have made and deposited to the court a statutory declaration in which I attach here once more.
The order you hold with the TREASONOUS Judge Foskitt is illegal, unlawful and VOID.
Yours faithfully
Mike & Ann Clarke

DECEMBER 4 2012 Received at 20.02pm today
Read A COPY OF the JUDGE FOSKITT'S order sent here from Pannone LLPs threat of prison in their email from paul.jonson@pannone.co.uk
Dear Sir
We attach the final order we obtained in the claim against you. As you know it contains a penal notice.
The email you have sent to our partners/former partners is a breach of that order namely:
3 (d) “taking any further steps to enforce or claim to be entitled to enforce the so called “Commercial Lien” or the alleged debt said to be represented by the same whether in the sum of £9M, £5M or any other sum;”
3 (e) “ further communication, whether by email or otherwise howsoever, with any member of the 3rd Claimant LLP in relation to any matter concerning the so called “Commercial Lien” or the alleged debt said to be represented by the same whether in the sum of £9M, £5M or any other sum;”
Unless you now take steps to withdraw the so called commercial lien and cease emailing our partners/former partners, we will consider we have no alternative but to apply to court for a committal order.
You have until 4pm Friday 7 November 2012 to provide evidence to the writer of the withdrawal of the so called commercial lien. This time limit will not be extended and we will not enter into correspondence on the point.
Yours faithfully
Paul Jonson Head of Dispute Resolution and Regulatory Division For and on behalf of Pannone LLP
More incompetence
This is the Judge that refused a common law court with jury!! TREASON

DECEMBER 4 2012 NAMES GIVEN
PHSO DECISION WAS MADE FROM A PANEL OF 5
JACK KELLET, LIBBY CLARK, CLAIRE EVANS, MARTIN PIKE, ANN HARDING & THE DEPUTY MASTER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL WAS A BANCROFT-RIMMER. APPEAL LETTERS HAVE GONE BACK TO BOTH.

DECEMBER 4 2012 WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW, REBELLION BECOMES DUTY.

In a frightening example of how the state is tightening its grip around the free Internet, it has emerged that You Tube is complying with thousands of requests from governments to censor and remove videos that show protests and other examples of citizens simply asserting their rights, while also deleting search terms by government mandate.
The latest example is You Tube’s compliance with a request from the British government to censor footage of the British Constitution Group Lawful Rebellion protest, during which they attempted to civilly arrest Judge Michael Peake at Birkenhead county court.
Peake was ruling on a case involving Roger Hayes, former member of UKIP, who has refused to pay council tax, both as a protest against the government’s treasonous activities in sacrificing Britain to globalist interests and as a result of Hayes clearly proving that council tax is illegal.
Hayes has embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent himself as a third party in court and that “Roger Hayes” is a corporation and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law.

DECEMBER 4 2012
Read a recorded delivery letter to a DIRECTOR of PANNONE LLP's, CHARLES SOREN ROBERT TATTAM D.o.B. 14.07.1953, of "The Ranch House", Gore Lane, Alderley Edge, Cheshire. SK9 7SF. This will be the start, to name and shame the associates of the criminal, HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES. Those whom will sit back in their "Ranch Houses" whilst associated with fraud, theft, mal administration and financial rape of the elederly vulnerable, acting with impunity, afforded the protection of the New World Order of elite! The turkey will be in the oven for these people over christmas because they have in effect stolen my mothers, for this christmas, but we know who you are and where you are? Keep looking down your drive at night Charles, you never know when... "THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW BAILIFFS" might arrive! Email to Charles

DECEMBER 3 2012 DECLARATION FILED
STAT. DEC. Filed today by recorded delivery upon
Manchester Civil Justice Centre
1 Bridge Street West
Manchester Greater Manchester
England
M60 9DJ
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
RECORDED DELIVERY
--------------------
Chester Civil Justice Centre
Trident House Little St John Street
Chester, Cheshire
CH1 1SN
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
RECORDED DELIVERY
-------------------------
PANNONE LLPs
123 Deansgate,
Manchester M3 2BU
FAO THE PARTNERS = ALL
FAO CASE NO 2MA90015
RECORDED DELIVERY
DECLARING that the harassment order made of injunction is UNLAWFUL, ILLEGAL & THEREFORE VOID.
Michael Clarke's STATUTORY DECLARATION
I, Michael Clarke, Occupation CARER of Ann Clarke
Address c/o 31 Cherry Tree Rd Blackpool FY4 4NS
Make the following declaration under the statutory declarations act 1835
It has recently come to my attention that the CIVIL CASE No 2MA90015 of an injunction made against me on fraudulent Harassment grounds was not only;
a) Unlawful; as it was conducted in my absence without my consent and where a constitutionally formed common law court with a jury was requested and was refused it also was;
b) Illegal; as it breached my rights to protection against any civil liability whilst conducting my duties as a carer, under Mental Capacity Act section 5
I hereby make oath and state as follows that the order made against me is VOID because;
1. The allegations contained in the counter defence were of a criminal nature contained within a commercial lien – claim of £9 million pounds against PANNONE LLP’s and therefore was not in a court of law that deals with such criminal nature in a fair and impartial manner and;
2. For the reasons also listed above in a. & b.
I understand that a person who intentionally makes a false statement in a statutory declaration is guilty of an offence under section 18 of the statutory declarations act 1835, and I believe that the statements in this declaration are true in every particular.
Signed by: Michael: Clarke

NOVEMBER 29 2012
LOOK at the possibility of private prosecutions when justice becomes injustice by being blocked from fair and impartial hearings, take matters up to a criminal level to gain a court de jure, common law with jury.

NOVEMBER 28 2012
Read letter to appeals court emailed posted and faxed.

NOVEMBER 28 2012
Read the reply from COP rep Jemima Ndow-Coker that now I am supposed to go back to Judge Jackson for reconsideration even after he has issued a sealed order stating his refusal to conduct any appeal here to Read

NOVEMBER 28 2012
Read a formal letter sent recorded delivery to PHSO.

NOVEMBER 28 2012
Email to PHSO Alice Coral requesting 1. that the file is passed to the review team and 2. the names of the senior directors that took the decision to suspend the investigation.

NOVEMBER 28 2012
Read & take note that the courts keep RE-labelling the APPLICATION respondents as my sister "WILD" and that our skeleton appeal is about fraud and corruption based around an impartial and fair hearing not given and where our respondents are named as the ultimate liability is 'The Court of Protection' its Master 'Denzil Lush' and its agent 'Hugh Jones', and OPG CEO ALAN ECCLES!!!
What the hell has that got to do with my sister?????
DO YOU THINK THAT THE COURTS ARE TRYING TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE!!!
MORE CORRUPTION

NOVEMBER 27 2012
Read a REPLY from the Court of Appeal today. they certainly don't make the process easy do they. So, I copied the letter and sent it to COP representative Jemima Ndow-Cocker,
Date 27112012 Ref: Appeal
Dear Jemima
Ref 10370284 and the attached letter from APPEAL COURTS
Is this letter now implying that we send the appeal back to you for another Court of Protection Appeal or does the sealed order from Judge Jackson on the 17th November 2012 cover that there will be no appeal, if so, do I send it back to the APPEAL COURTS with Judge Jacksons sealed order of appeal refusal?? Linked here
CONFUSED?? but not broken!
Kind regards, Mike Clarke.

NOVEMBER 26 2012 Two pronged move
forward failing the Court of Appeals fair and impartial aaproach on our plight currently we hear being considered by Judges.

NOVEMBER 24 2012 British Constitution Group Annual meeting

in Stoke on Trent today where 500 people, of the growing fast organisation met to plan a go forward strategy for the next 3 years on Magna Carta 2015, the Bradbury 100 greenback pound & Various topics discussed on the days event with the private meetings of folk from up and down the country who can't all be wrong about the gravity of the situation in the UK of the lack of Justice amongst other things.

NOVEMBER 23 2012 A PICTURE MESSAGE
A self explanatory photograph depicting what MPs really care about but when it comes to the care of the elderly or the protection of children what do they really care about? Mainstream politics is dead in the water, we need a new way forward which will include real Justice. Magna Carta 2015 & The British Constitution Group Annual meeting tomorrow Stoke on Trent we make a start on the real future for our children the elderly and the vulnerable not the snouts that are permanently in the troughs of our coffers.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 Emigration & Exchange rate
Read about the problem with emigration and living from an exchange rate, just a sample of correspondence ignored and denied by the deputy.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 FACEBOOK

NOVEMBER 20 2012 FOLLOW UP LETTERS FROM COP
Read em n weep!! We do!

NOVEMBER 20 2012 APPEAL what appeal??
Read how the C O P seem to be trying out tactics to confuse you about what appeal and when! Read the sealed refusal to appeal by Judge Jackson regarding the Judgement of the 24th October 2012 that is now recorded with the COURT of APPEAL in London.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 MORE LIES & DECEIPT PROOF
Read evidence from the pension service of HUGH JONES informing them that mothers intention to return to live in the UK in total contradiction of the LIES he stated in the recorded meeting of the 18/7/2011 where he states he did not accept that we had emigrated! The recorded meeting to the right of this at the top of the column.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 MORE LIES & DECEIPT PROOF
Read exhibits page 1 where original claim in the HIGH COURTS 1998 its states mums life expectancy at 83, and in HUGH JONES of PANNONEs LLP separate harassment claim against the carer Page 3 section 7, conducted unlawfully without consent and illegally in breach of Mental capacity act Section 5 where any carer is protected against any civil liability in connection with the care of a patient under the Act, disregarded by corrupt Judge, take note where they state by Partner Paul Jonson mums life expectancy has exceed the age predicted of 70 ie 10 years.
More proof of lies that they used to discredit me in their unlawful illegal trial of false harassment charges to threaten me with prison. The corrupt Judge was led to believe that our protest was not justified on these lied about grounds in which PANNONEs LLP charged my mother £26,377 to so called familiarise themselves with the case in which all papers where there to read.
Just cast an eye over Page 4 in which Hugh Jones's statement to the court himself chose to state a life expectancy on section 9 of 70. So how is the life expectancy being altered and changed to suit what their objectives are at the time.
Draw your own conclusions.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 BCG ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Read ABOUT THE BRITSIH CONSTITUTION ANNUAL CONFERENCE THIS SAT 24TH NOVEMEBR 2012. IF YOU REALLY WANT TO HELP CHANGE THE FUTURE FOR YOU AND ESPECIALLY YOUR CHILDREN PLEASE ATTEND.

NOVEMBER 20 2012 STOP COMMON PURPOSE
Read and learn about whats happenning under your nose.

NOVEMBER 19 2012 On the 30th October 2012

NOVEMBER 19 2012
Read a further reply from PHSO showing intervention from higher authorities!!

NOVEMBER 19 2012 NO JUSTICE
Read all about it by Roy Jenkins and keeping the snouts out of the trough.

NOVEMBER 18 2012
Read the letter from PHSO Alice Coral on the 3rd July 2012 where she asks for my mothers consent and authorisation. WHat games are being played now!

NOVEMBER 18 2012
Read A FURTHER LETTER TO PHSO ALICE CORAL
RE: Ombudsman ref: EN-135765 FURTHER FOLLOW UP EMAIL
Dear Alice
Upon reading your letter in more detail I feel it only fair to update you further on the facts.
1.Mrs Clarke has made the complaint and you are well aware of that as stated on the 11.07.2012
2.I currently do not receive allowances from my mothers funds as my mothers funds have expired.
3.You have had my mothers authorisation in letters you asked for that were sent on the 11.07.2012
4.You was not aware of my new appointment as Executor in my mothers affairs where according to her ‘living will’ anyone whom stills claims incapacity as they do I STEP IN to assume Executor with all the powers that go with it.
5.As above I am my mother’s acting Personal Representative.
I trust the information I have sent to you this weekend and copied to our MP Gordon Marsden will ensure this investigation continues with the utmost of vigour.
The corruption fraud and wrong doing in this case is substantial.
ATTACHED IS A FURTHER SIGNED LETTER BY MS ANN CLARKE
Kind regards
LIVING WILL – EXECUTOR - Mike Clarke (PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE) &
THE AGGRIEVED - Ann Clarke

NOVEMBER 17 2012
Michael Clarke; The heads of damages allowed for a 'so-called' professional receiver 'HUGH JONES' was approx. £20,000 for the entire duration, Hugh Jones took £27,000 in his first year! He did this whilst hiding the facts from his client. It took 11 year to get a brief account of what he has took. The full accounts have been refused to mum. In the statement BELOW he gave the court, the judge, & the family assurances his costs would not ERRODE upon the heads of damages what was infact for mum and this is how he started his deputy ship of LIES and that is how it continued for 11 years with all the proof to offer that the COURT OF PROTECTION are trying to cover up and PROTECT HUGH JONES and them!! Now why do you think that is.. well the 1st duty is to the courts for the solicitor and courts probable first duty is to protect the deputy whilst the client can swing! would you consider the COURT OF PROTECTION [COP] to be a COURT OF NEGLECTION [CON]?

NOVEMBER 17 2012
Read the release of the near 12 year old 1st general order by Denzil Lush and in particular the highlighted paragraphs; and to remember currently HUGH JONES's charges have exceeded £150,000 plus a further £100,000 of mal administration where he failed to have financial jurisdiction whilst the client was in emigration and or by not providing a euro account in the country of residence in order to protect her against a devalueing exchange rate that Mrs Clarke was forced to live off for 4 years and more. The clear and concise Criminal Neglect which the court of protection is refusing to acknowledge or deal with is tantamount to FRAUD which is shown clearly in the courts own corrupt Judgements and orders favouring their own agent HUGH JONES!
CORRUPTION AND FRAUD

NOVEMBER 16 2012 LATE REPLY FROM PHSO
Read our response to her reply. What Alice Coral of the PHSO seems to be implying is that I am not a fit and proper person to be involved with this complaint? I think an EXECUTOR of a living will is more fit and proper than any other! As so happens I too believe there are several people involved with this case that are most certainly not fit and proper persons in which the truth will out in time. Has Alice Coral uncovered things that she has been told to cover up?

NOVEMBER 16 2012 Letter from PHSO
Parliamentary Health & Service OMBUDSMAN
Read how even the PHSO are trying to brush mum off. This letter is from PHSO containing a copy letter to our MP we also incorporate our reply today containing two copy letters sent to them from Mum and signed by mum which at the time is what they asked for on the 11th July 2012! So why are they now trying to back track? And if this is genuinely their answer then why has it took 4 months to send it? Has there been some judicial intervention ie., MORE CORRUPTION?

NOVEMBER 15 2012 ORIGINAL CLAIM RELEASED
Read the original claim for £1.6 million and inparticular page 23 referring to the receivers costs applied for of £30,000 for the entire duration of the management of the estate! The claim was reduced in a compromised out of court settlement at £775,000 & HUGH JONES took nearly all of these fees in his first year. He further lied to the court, the judge and the family .... coming soon!

NOVEMBER 14@1600 2012
Read an email from Sister and brothers solicitor Simon Heapy after sending him a copy of the appeal.Will here to Read

NOVEMBER 14@1347 2012
Appeal filed by recorded delivery.

NOVEMBER 14@1200 2012
Arrival of the sealed order on the day that appeal submissions has timed out of 21 days!

NOVEMBER 14 2012 TIME OUT to APPEAL
The court of Appeal say that the appelants appeal must be on their desk today and because the court of protection have not sent the sealed order that has got to be in that appeal it can only be lodged with an extension of time applied for... now ask yourself.. why is the court not sending the sealed orders in time to appeal they have had 21 days.. ANYWAY we hereby publish our skeleton arguement Read our appeal. This is our brief skeleton..

NOVEMBER 13@14.20 2012 Phone call to COP Courts
02070715680 in the last 5 minutes I was speaking to the Royal Courts to find out what has happened to our appeal made on the 20th August 2012 against section 3 of the order of the 31st July 2012 and they informed me after some confusion that they have been informed that the file is due back from the courts in Manchester with directions that will be sent to us in writing this week. So, is it normal for it to take 3 months for them to give directions to an appeal request!! Lets see whats in this...

NOVEMBER 13@1315 2012 Phonecall to Appeal Courts
02079476533 in a conversation today to the Court of Appeal I explain that our time to appeal in the recent judgement of the 24th October 2012 runs out tomorrow and our delay is outside our control due to the obstruction by court of protection officials whom appear to be delaying the sending of the sealed order presumeably to prevent an appeal. The lady concerned explained that we must tick the box to apply for extension of time and submit these reasons that are obviously no fault of our own and there will be no problem. Does all this not show how the court of protection are manipulating behind the scenes to make the whole process awkward and nearly unmanageable for a layman so that their efforts will hopefully pay off and one might give up. Well not this one!

NOVEMBER 13 2012
Read A SAMPLE OF PROOF now released that the solicitor receiver deputy HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP never did the work he said he did at the beginning in 2001 where he charged my mother in the first year £26,377 to peruse all documentation to gain the knowledge to predict his financial assessments based on her predicted life span that he claimed was 70 years of age and where I have constantly claimed but been ignored that her documents will reveal the actual prediction was 83 years of age and this document proves this and shows Mr HUGH JONES did not spend his time going over the documents at all to find this information, so what did he spend £26,377.00 on ???

NOVEMBER 13 2012
Read our email enquiry as to what has happened to our first appeal to section 3 of the order of the 31st July 2012 in which we have heard nothing from the court of protection!! Read the appeal this link where nothing has happened. Copy of the order here to read on page 11 section 3 where the judge states mum does not have capacity to make the decision on whether to sell her house or keep it. Read the judgement/order. This was appealed above but nothing has happened. The appeal was made and acknowledged.. there was a delay in getting the proof for fee remission from HUGH JONES but was sent in and acknowledged by COP representative Jemima Ndow-Coker and then after that to date NOTHING!!!!! ???????? the court of neglection have chose to conveniently shelve it??? Now why has that happened??? This order was not about mum s house it was about her capacity that our doctors claim she has!! Incidentally 4 of them!!
MORE CORRUPTION PROOF

NOVEMBER 13 2012
Read AN OPEN LETTER TO ED MILIBAND: Spreading such open letters as this addressed to one more whore politician hopefully will bring peoples attention to the harm corrupt secret courts are doing to families and society as a whole. Whether paedophile child trafficking judges of the Family Court or corrupt spiv judges of the Court of Protection with their sleazy fingers in the pie of Guardianship Fraud

NOVEMBER 12 2012
Read how the Court of Protection obstruct the appeal process by delaying sending the sealed orders that you need in order to file an appeal which is due to run out of time!
MORE CORRUPTION PROOF

NOVEMBER 11 2012
A woman now free from the receiver deputy HUGH JONES whom thinks he has got away with what he has done. Whilst mum relaxed this week in Spain we have returned today to continue to persue justice for her and the re-instatement of the funds missing from her estate by the corruption that has dogged her and me for years. We will continue this fight until we get the answers and not least all the full accounts constantly asked for but refused access to.

NOVEMBER 3 2012 What the FUQ
FREQUENTLY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS


The corruption lies deceit and fraud is going on worldwide watching this video is like looking in a mirror of our own events in the UK. We are all being deceived and our wealth being stolen from us.

NOVEMBER 2 2012 UPDATE on Mothers Plight
My mother remains as I do adamant that justice will continue to be sought into 2013. She has been robbed not only of her dignity, but also financially raped, by secret courts and corrupt agents. We will continue this fight until we see action taken to remedy these issue's that have blighted her life and mine beyond recognition. We currently are formulating an appeal against Judge Jacksons recent order on costs and are considering our next course of action upon the PUBLIC GUARDIAN CEO alongside its agent PANNONE LLP HUGH JONES.
The actions being considered are more protesting outside the offices of PANNONES, the civil petitioning of lawsuits against the courts and Pannones and other options available to us to force the full disclosure of all accounts that sre still remaining a secret to this day that HUGH JONES claims there is nothin wrong with. Then if this is so why are we being denied the disclosure of such? You are hiding behind the word privacy and you are using this to shield the wrong doing that needs exposure. My mother was denied access to her own funds for her to gain legal representation whilst the persons against her were freely paid their costs from her estate delayed till death for me to pay! There is and are fundamental flaws in the corrupt system to hand where lawful jury courts are denied, where the bar is judgeing the bar in clear conflict and where the cover up of fraud, mal administration theft and criminal neglect continues with impunity. We may have managed to obtain maintain and keep a roof over our heads but these matters until remedy is given we will not give up on.

NOVEMBER 1 2012
Important Announcement - A Major Initiative
“Magna Carta 2015”
A New Governing Body
It is now 40 years since the Conservative government under Edward Heath's leadership enacted The European Communities Act 1972 marking the UK's accession to the European Economic Community and the start of the process of dismantling the sovereignty of our nation. This process has diminished the authority of parliament making it the servant of a foreign legislative body not directly elected by the British people.
No parliament has ever been granted the authority by the people to diminish its own status and yet the collective political establishment accept this to be the case without objection. It is self-evident that the people are not happy with this arrangement and in the face of a blanket refusal by the political establishment to address this issue it is now deemed appropriate for the people themselves to take matters into their own hands and declare the reinstatement of our national sovereignty – without reference to parliament - it having surrendered its sovereignty and thus its right to govern.

OCTOBER 30 2012 FAcebook Entry by;
Aj Hollis... From experience if you do find honest representations it will be warned off or corrupted by the criminal element that infests the British Government, Judiciary, police and legal profession. One can see the extreme extent of corruption in the courts with the protection of Masonic paedophile rings from senior police, treasonous Judges and predators in the child protection service. The Court of Protection criminally supports guardianship fraud as a matter of absolute complicity, just as the family court is an active participant in child trafficking. The first time I heard of the Court of Protection was in Australia in the early 90s when the partner of a friend that worked in security told me how he was hired as a minder by a visiting British lawyer. This lawyer claimed to be working for the Court of Protection and was in Australia to track down a UK expat that had inherited a large sum of money that they had decided he wasn’t entitled to. Once the lawyer mistakenly felt that he had the right man for the job, he offered ‘S’ a considerable sum to murder the Expat. This is the level of behaviour that these type of unscrupulous parasites will stoop to Mike. I have not given up getting back into contact with S.
In regard to our case Putin and Minihane of Burroughs Day act without regard to how blatant their fraud and racketeering has been as they believe they will be protected by creatures that like them and Jones have no sense of rational common decency. I know that a number of the criminals that have targeted are freemasons and suspect that most if not all are. If you look into Freemasons you will understand exactly why Franco hunted them down and executed them on the spot. I don’t care whether the majority of low ranking masons are good old boys; the reality is that the lower ranks are a testing ground to discover those of a criminal nature with the devious intelligence not to be caught. The hierarchy of the legal profession works in a similar fashion as the Freemasons. The firms that are most powerful are the ones that behave with the greatest criminality. In these firms they weed out honest junior lawyers by forcing them to clock up an unreasonable number of billing hours each week. The juniors have three choices; one is to try find a rare job with a smaller honest law firm, second is to work in excess of a 100hrs a week or third is to cheat clients by falsifying their billing hours. It is those that make the third choice that these firms wish to retain and it is these sort of firms that fill the ranks of lawyers for the elderly and guardianship parasites. In our case the predation of my mother escalated on the death of her partner when corrupt West Country lawyer Jeremy Thring tried to foist an old superseded Will on her, having failed in that fraudulent attempt he then proceeded to take most of a decade to complete the probate process and make my mothers life a misery. During that time a cabal of corrupt professionals subjected her to what is now dubbed “gang torture’. When I first returned from Australia I thought my brother must be making up his extreme claims and this sadly damaged our relationship and played into the hands of the parasites. However the underhanded actions of corrupt lawyers and other snakes have shown him to be entirely correct.
Even the offices of the renowned Australian Human rights lawyer ‘Jeffrey Robertson’ fails to respond to my brother’s communications even though he has supplied documented proof of the orchestrated criminality of the guardianship office and numerous parasitic lawyers working under the protection of the entirely corrupt Court of Protection racket. The corrupt office of the official solicitor that was instrumental in the absolute fraud that robbed Lee of his home also pocketed $17,000 of our money for a rubberstamp to the corruption, two forged Wills written by two sets of corrupt lawyers, threats stopping us maintaining our own properties so they could be given the impression of dereliction so the properties could be sold to corrupt associates of the false Executors for land value only.
They have used a corrupt lawyer in Marbella whose website indicates another Masonic connection. At first they attempted to corrupt the Spanish land registry but instead when that failed they installed squatters to use ‘adverse possession’ to try to have our last property transferred in their names then on sold in a shady deal to the squatter whose brother in-law is already in jail for property fraud. We have had our lawyer and accountant in Spain both beaten up while dealing with our property for us. We have had an Insurance company “Towergate” take £1000s given to them by Burroughs Day in policy payments so high that they can only be seen as more racketeering. Yet Towergate refuse to give any information from their loss adjusters report to help us confirm the false executor’s involvement was reason for the rejection of our claim for thefts and damage to our property in Spain. With these things in mind you can understand why even the honest Lawyers and Judges keep their heads down and why you would be led down the path of bankruptcy if you get caught up in legal fiction. The system has been corrupted beyond repair and there needs to be a cleansing that won’t come from playing their game.

OCTOBER 29 2012 BEING ADVISED by
Friends connected whom work within the court system who are strongly advising against the common law stuff and obtaining a solicitor, after taking their advise and doing exactly that I am finding it difficult to obtain that representation and not for the first time. After speaking to several solicitors companies it seems that its easy to say it but putting it into practice is another matter. Like I said to the Judge, I never wanted to be 'Mike of the family Clarke' but the lack of obtaining a judicial platform to go up against what is effectively like dealing with the 'British Mafia' is proving almost impossible to do. I ask? what does a person have to do in this country to obtain justice, and if you cannot get it then what other options are left remaining. Common law still stands in this country, so why not have it? This matter is unresolved. A large practice of solicitors in Manchester called PANNONE LLP are feeling that they have got away scot free with what they have done, combined with the CEO of THE Office of PUBLIC GUARDIAN backed by COURT officials of the so called COURT of protection. They are not protecting the vulnerable they are financially raping them! This website will not be closed until justice has been seen to be done, you will not get away with the financial rape of my mother without paying the god given price. The system has robbed my mother out of the funds here accused of.
LEGALISED FRAUD!
PANNONE LLP claim to have what I describe as, an unlawful INJUNCTION, against me making my claims on the internet or otherwise, that I continue to do, without facing the threat of prison!! These people have conducted themselves in clear breach and violation of Mental Capacity Act section 5, knowingly, with impunity! They have violated their own statute laws without a care in the world. I have been subjected alongside my mother to years of intentional infliction of emotional distress, again with impunity. These people are animals. Put me before a common law jury court to tell my story I say, and we will see who will be doing time! They also believe they have stopped our commercial lien claim listed here on this website. This is basically commerce, as with any other commerce and cannot be stopped!

OCTOBER 25 2012 RESPONSE FROM THE JUDGE
Dear Mr Clarke, The judge thanks you for your letter but asks me to respond that he has given his decision and is not able to enter into further correspondence. Regards Alexandra

OCTOBER 25 2012 CRIMINAL LAWYER RESPONSE
Hi Mike, As I said in my recent text, ‘Wow’. Very interesting and despite last night’s reservations about the site, it’s actually very well put together and informative. I've considered some issues/articles in a cursory fashion whilst others in a more thorough and detailed manner. Let me say from the outset that I can see the validity in your allegations and issues that you take. The difficulty here (as far as my own involvement is concerned) is that I am a Criminal Appeals Lawyer and not a Civil Petitioner. The most recent Judgement suggests matters that I could assist in clarifying but ultimately it would serve no other purpose other than to seek to firmly establish your Mother’s wishes. The key issues here however are the theft and corruption allegations which I find realistic and full of substance. The reading of your site caused me to raise an eyebrow on more than one occasion. Unfortunately, this is not something that I could assist you with. It is beyond my area of expertise and knowledge and would no doubt take over a large part of both my business and family life. A pleasant chat over a few drinks in a pub is quite the opposite of the reality of this situation. Its a fight that I sincerely wish and hope that you and your supporters win and in doing so, I hope it brings about an end to such mal practice and legalised fraud. Regretfully I cant assist Mike but I sincerely wish you every success.

OCTOBER 24 2012
Read a letter to the JUDGE.

OCTOBER 24 2012 Facebook Observer entry
Frankly these creatures through threats of trespass claim an authority to move outside of common law to protect a contrived right for protected criminals to defraud decent people. There are now tens of thousands of decent citizens that recognize the absolute criminality of our terrorist government and the whore Judiciary. It is approaching a time where the treasonous criminality of these parasites will force the population to take the law back into there own hands and put end to this railroad to fascist dictatorship.

OCTOBER 24 2012
Read a reply from the judge that leave to appeal will not be granted. Dear Mr Clarke Thank you for your email. The Judge has asked me to inform you that court judgments are not sealed. You will however receive a copy of the sealed order from the court in due course. If you wish to appeal, you need not wait for this sealed order. You will need permission to bring an appeal, which should normally first be sought from the trial judge and then, if refused, from the Court of Appeal. To assist, Mr Justice Peter Jackson indicates that he does not grant permission to appeal ( please see the attached certificate), so any application for permission should now be made to the Court of Appeal. Regards

OCTOBER 24 2012
Today our case is being examined by a criminal lawyer whom specialises in miscarriages of justice reversals.

OCTOBER 23 2012
Read the Judges order for costs for both parties to be attached to my mothers house that will force a sale upon her death that we now launch another appeal on the grounds that full disclosure requested has been dismissed. It's amazing that under article 6 of human rights entitles a person to a fair and impartial hearing but yet when claimed in court this was not a fair and impartial court it was dismissed. It then went on against claims of non representation due to HUGH JONES obstructing the use of her own monies for representation but yet my sister and brother were allowed representation and HUGH JONESs costs for representation are ALL covered from mums estate what part of this do they not understand is corrupt. This they would not get away with under a common law court with a jury. The judge claims my conduct is poor, I claim at least I am honest!

OCTOBER 22 2012
Read our response to the Judge as requested about HUGH JONES and the relatives costs submissions and our advice to the Judge on Trust LAW where I as executor and beneficiary to that trust take precedence over that Judge & thus where his own position is reflected as TRUSTEE. Orders are given to the Judge and if not complied with he will be in breach of that trust!

OCTOBER 18 2012
Read HUGH JONES costs statement that he also wants to charge on to the property.

OCTOBER 18 2012 A BILL PRESENTED TO THEIR OWN MOTHER
Read about a sister and brother whom had representation in court of their own solicitor where my mother was denied & deprived access to her own funds to pay for her own representation and that they now want their solicitors expenses £4,400 attaching to my mothers property as a charge. UNBELIEVABLE. They sat in court objecting to my mothers wishes in which my mother holds doctors reports confirming her capacity but yet they want her to pay for their own costs!! What does that tell you? Their ultimate objective of course by delaying its effect until my mothers death is such that they can then increase their inheritance from forcing upon me not only the cost of mothers burial probably £2500 but also her financial gifts to them of £2000 plus these charges of £4400 so the expected monies needed to be found by me upon mothers death would be in the region of £10,000 or they can then force a sale of what would then become my house!! SICK

OCTOBER 18 2012 PHSO LETTER
Read an update from PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman investigations and our reply.

OCTOBER 10 2012 In Relation to COSTS
Read our application for interim orders to be made to force disclosure of all accounts alongside other important matters before assessing costs.

OCTOBER 9 2012 SUCCESS THE FINAL JUDGEMENT
Read the final judgement today. Mother is elated & as such we state we have already moved back from Spain though we retain a holiday home in Spain. We also state to the Judge that Mike and James are about sign up our limited company for the lease of a nightclub in Blackpool that we fully believe will provide for our future requirements over and above the house generated income that we currently have increased since our last statement from £13000 to £20000. Having now discharged the receivership of HUGH JONES we can get on with the business of living life to a fuller level.

www.dorothys.me

SEPTEMBER 29 2012
Read about more unhappiness nationwide with regard to unlawful courts and the growing rebellion to it!

SEPTEMBER 26 2012 How it really is...

SEPTEMBER 19 2012 Channel 4 TV
Further contact today with Channel 4 that for the purposes of confidentiality cannot be revealed at this time.

SEPTEMBER 19 2012 Facebook Comments
That are very relevant

SEPTEMBER 19 2012
Posted and emailed the SUPREME COURT of appeal fee exemption form cop44a sent to court of protection.

SEPTEMBER 19 2012
Read an urgent request for a response as this is the 4th request sent to Hugh Jones.

SEPTEMBER 18 2012 @ 14.50pm
Watch the debate of The Self Directed Support Bill that is to be debated in the Scottish Parliament this afternoon at 2.50pm. The bill will affect carers and we have briefed MSPs about issues of concern to carers (the difficulties of accessing different choices and employing family members for example).

SEPTEMBER 18 2012 How REAL Justice cannot be AVOIDED
Issued yesterday 17th September 2012, UNDER COMMON LAW. It is an honor and a privilege to be a fellow human bearing witnessing to your amazing resolve to hold people who believe they are immune to the same laws as? the rest of us based on power and money. Their crimes are apprehensible at the very least.

SEPTEMBER 17 2012 Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman
Read PHSO update on their continued investigation into the OPG & Hugh Jones.

SEPTEMBER 16 2012 Life ‘O’ Riley
My family believe I, as mum’s carer, have a Life ‘O’ Riley.
Let’s now go and scrutinise this so-called Life ‘O’ Riley.

1. I don’t smoke but my mother does. I respect her choice to that and I don’t restrict that choice in any way. She smokes as she desires and sees fit. This has resulted in my 16 years of being what’s known as a secondary smoker where the upshot is lung damage showing on my x-rays in a private consultation about breathing problems.
2. I clock watch when not in my mother’s presence, something known in the world of carers; your mind will not let you away from the care when in fact you are away.
3. I would like to have rampant sex in my own private house where I could swing from the chandeliers or jump off the wardrobes in privacy, screaming to the delight of that privacy but this ended 16 years ago.
4. I regularly on occasion am called to the toilet to assist with the removal of a stool that is causing discomfort to my mother that I without worry or cause for concern assist and make light of it to my mother when in reality I really just want to heave and be sick. Likewise if we are totally unlucky and her stool has turned to liquid causing a mess very few could deal with I just make light and get on with the care and cleaning process.
5. Though I have lived 4 and a half years in Spain I have only once been to the beach for a pick nick and that was whilst waiting for visiting hours when mum was admitted to hospital for a suspected stroke, otherwise I do not feel I can leave her for any long period.
6. In recent years she wears Tenna pants due to slight incontinence which require in some instances replacing twice a day where sometimes the stench of urine can sometimes be overpowering to the point of feeling sick and your stomach wants to heave.
7. I & my partner long for respite for us both but because our families believe we have a life O riley will not provide any assistance of any description it has only been close friends.
8. We cannot plan for a proper holiday due to the costs implications of paying for mum if she comes or paying for mums care if she doesn’t.
9. Whilst dinning out mum may have some slight accidents where her food might dribble down her and needs to have assistance to that eating process this is not only embarrassing it also is hardly setting a scene for a nice meal out to be enjoyed as one would, if alone.
10. Whilst out mum requires to go to the toilet like we all do but this can be a challenging situation at the best of times where depending on the venue, whether their facilities are accessible for a wheelchair etc.
11. Getting ready to go out needs enormous motivation as you realise not only have you to get yourself ready, you then have to get mum ready, requiring bathing and blow drying her hair and doing her nails etc.
12. Whilst out and about just having to push a wheel chair around for 16 years takes an enormous amount of commitment and courage.
13. Bathing mum is a heavy and hard task that needs doing regular to avoid any complications of sores etc.
14. Trying to balance your own life what there is left, with trying to maintain hers, is again a very challenging situation needing great resolve and stamina to maintain a staying power of commitment to the care of that individual not just for a day, a week or a month, but for years and years.
15. When mum wakes if it’s before you then you need to get up to assist.
Just a fraction of the tasks to hand!
Do you think you can do it?
Do you think it’s a Life ‘O’ Riley?

SEPTEMBER 16 2012 Snapshot of my life before 1996

I had given up my 4 businesses to care 24/7 for mum. My life as a nightclub entreprenaur was over, with all its trappings of celebrity encounters of which there were many, pictured above Sarah Lancashire(Rachel) from Coronation St, March 1996 in my nightclub that was closed 3 months after this photo. My businesses that I dropped were a security fence and shutter business, an 18 bedroomed student accomodation house, an overland tour business in Africa and not least of all my nightclub. I was probably at peak period of business potential. The care needed to give my mother some level of quality and mobility back to her life needed a 24/7 attendance, which was given. It was a life changing decision that was to cost me dearly. To this day 16 years later it still is costing me dear, through critisism and chastisement and various corrupt processes we are having to continually endure. Life without my mothers award of money was easier without it. So what if, I currently drive a Jaguar, I drove one before & incidenatly so did my mother! So what if I have a rented villa in Spain with a swimming pool, I & my mother deserve one! My life choices are mine and my mothers are hers. Please respect that to all those that don't! You know who you are!

SEPTEMBER 16 2012 SNAPSHOT of care and history 1997
After coming into my care in 1996 mum was doubly incontinent, she was permanently reliable on 24 hr care for everything. Her legs were stuck with spasticity at 90 degrees. The doctors said she would never walk again. They offered to cut the tendons so she could sleep better where the legs would then be floppy to allow them to be a horizontal position but I refused to accept she would not walk again. They said they could half cut the ham strings, stretch the legs to a straightish position in a 2 part opertation to try and get her to walk but from experience these cases failed and the spasticity would return. I would not authorise the full cut and only authorised a half cut in two operations and promised I would succeed to make her walk. On the 11th of July 1997 this picture was took & I over a very long period of devotion and perseverance did get her to walk again. The doctors were astonished. She retrained her toilet activities and after a year, had regained her mobility and her incontinence had gone. SUCCESS. This I might add was done single handed.

SEPTEMBER 15 2012 Devoted son & mother prior to accident 1994

Taken on the Costa Del Sol whilst severe problems in mums marriage to my father had started we scooted off to the Costa for R&R (rest & recuperation). The devotion to a mother that was there back then trying to help her through what was to turn out to be a bitter divorce and an onset to severe depression leading to her tragic suicide attempts that unfolded into life changing events for her and for me.

SEPTEMBER 15 2012 HUGH JONES STATEMENT
Read the released final submission statement of HUGH JONES to Judge Jackson. Read also a final submission statement of 2 pages to Judge Jackson from Brother sister Angie / Kevin

SEPTEMBER 14 2012
Read our final submission to JUDGE JACKSON. Our internet service has been offline in Spain for the past 14 days due to taking a new contract out on a new villa that we have moved into, we apologise for the delays. Due to further requests by court of protection officials to fill in more forms regarding mums appeal to the supreme courts we have travelled back to the UK to complete these and lodge them. Take note it has taken them 3 weeks from the 20th August 2012 to telephone us to request further forms filled in and here we release the phone call shortly... We have 2 further submission statements from HUGH JONES and sister Angela/Brother Kevin to be placed here later today. LIVING WILL.. On July 28, 2009, Barack Obama became the first United States President to announce publicly that he had a living will and to encourage others to do the same. He told an AARP town meeting, "So I actually think it's a good idea to have a living will. I'd encourage everybody to get one. I have one; Michelle has one. And we hope we don't have to use it for a long time, but I think it's something that is sensible.".... Mothers living will is now in operation and within our submission to the Judge it states that any threat to her estate by way of capacity issue's the Executor of her living will is to step in as I have to remind the Judge that her property and estate must remain intact without the sale of her house and also we have demanded detailed accounts from the receiver over 11 years to have those forensically examined.

SEPTEMBER 7 2012 Mums favourite dish

Friday special 'fish & chips' mums favourite dish on the Costa at our local restaurant at Lauro Golf, LaRisa. A picture of health against all abusive comments made from others with underlying motives. A facebook message from an observer ... Hiya hunni, as an outsider and not involved in this rift I can see from ur pics that ur mum is a picture of health and looks really, really well, it's awful what's been going on on ur page with jealous relatives, I can plainly see that u love ur mum very much ad she looks brill, keep it up hunni ur doin a grand job smile ps didn't want to write on ur wall and get a load ov abuse lots ov love to u and ur mum xxxxxxxxxxx

SEPTEMBER 1 2012 Observer Comments
Comment: Well I've been critical of you when i think in my view you've been wrong.
But how stupid is your sisters daughter. I read that Facebook stuff, utterly ridiculous to post that crap. To be fair the stuff from your partner was poor as well, does he talk in 'txt' speak all the time ? He should show some class and keep out of it, just let that chavvy niece of yours do all the talking as every post she writes puts you in a very good light ! As you say it really was the Jeremy Kyle show, the state of their english was appalling !!! But just like many celebs you read about, how stupid are people to argue online (specially with you !) as you'll then show it all on your website. With this court case ongoing you would think your sister/her daughter would bite their lip and stay out of it until the ruling. I must admit after reading all that Facebook stuff i'm beginning to change my view ! That stupid girl came across as some silly stupid chav, scary to think shes now a carer.
Depressing situation

AUGUST 30 2012 POSITION STATEMENT
Read HUGH JONES statement of position advocating the sale of mums property against her wishes!

AUGUST 29 2012 The tale of two letters....
Read These two letters show the level of vexatious matters that we have to endure because we are overseen daily by courts and vexatious family, scrutinised constantly. All of course usually based and laced with ulterior motives to suit other peoples ends one way or another. My mother and I after 16 years still cannot proceed to enjoy under article 8 of Human Rights a private life without being the subject of an intense barrage of family and government vexatious dirty work in order to discredit the relationship of mother and son any way possible. This website is here to expose what an individual faces along the way and the sheer unadulterated discomfort it provides that I might add will not break us.

AUGUST 28 2012
Read the controversial, last will & testament.

AUGUST 28 2012 JEREMY KYLE STYLE FAMILY
A selection of Facebook1 entries & also facebook2 entries

AUGUST 27 2012 Position Statement
POSITION STATEMENT released and sent to Channel 4 Television, PHSO Parliamentary Health AND Service Ombudsman, Hugh Jones, Simon Heapy And Judge Jackson.

AUGUST 26 2012 A daughter with a guilty consience
Text updates and if you read Angie's solicitors position statement a little lower down you will see the evidence of where she is backing the potential theft of her own mothers home to try and force her mother into care!! Can you imagine, forcing your own mother out of her own home thats she wants to stay in till her death, against her will, placing her into strangers care again against her will?? I shudder to think?? Well it will be a cold day in hell Angie when you get that wish whilst I'm alive!!

AUGUST 24 2012 Facebook 9pm

AUGUST 23 2012 Release of appeal application
To Read here.

AUGUST 23 2012 Brother and Sister's position
Read Angie and Kevin's solicitors postion statement,

AUGUST 23 2012 Update from PHSO
Read an update from the PHSO Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman investigation.

AUGUST 22 2012 Sister texts
Read A barrage of insultive texts from my sister today published here. It is assumed that her anger stems from the exposure she is sufffering from the lack of thoughts or care for her own mother with regard to her failure to send birthday wishes and or likewise recent mothers day thoughts also not expressed, exposed on this site to demonstrate her complete lack of consideration to her own mother!

AUGUST 22 2012 Channel 4 contact
Telephone calls from Channel 4 today have been made but total privacy has been asked to be respected so as not to jeopardise their further ongoing enquieries and therefore I cannot comment at this time on their content!!

AUGUST 20 2012 WILL UPDATE
A further will update has been made after seeking further lawful and legal advice on the ongoing current threat to my mothers life choices, in breach of article 8 of her Human Rights, of where she lives and with whom, concerning the still ongoing threat from the governments agents of juristocracy dictatorship & corruption within its vehicle, the Court of Protection / Office of the Public Guardian.

AUGUST 20 2012 Appeal to Supreme Court
Setion 3 of the Judges declaration has been requested to be sent for appeal to the supreme court. This application will be published here to read.

AUGUST 13 2012 Phone call from an angry, mothers sister, Rhoda
Listen to an angry sister about her being brought into what she terms as our family dispute not giving much regard to the sister that helped raise her as a child and whom now needs her help and she turns her back. Even though she re-iterates clearly she does not want her sister in a home.

AUGUST 13 2012 Phone calls & texts from CHANNEL 4 TV
This morning Bronagh Walsh whom is now awaiting producer permission to come and complete a filmed interview of my mother and me before returning to Spain in what will be a television program on the corruption faced by us from court of protection officials and the legalised theft from the vulnerable authorised by a juristocracy dictatorship of corruption.
Bronaghs Text: Hi. Still waiting on producer coming back to me ref meeting. How much longer will you be in the UK?? Is there any update.
Our reply: Hi we will be here one more week. We have published the recent court hearing to listen to on our websites. we are seeking legal help today from Age UK due to my mother being denied legal representation so as to formulate an appeal to the supreme court. Mums receiver deputy Hugh Jones has been paid out of mums estate to represent himself to object to her application whilst he also refuses her to gain access to her own funds to obtain legal representation of her own!!! How corrupt is that?? All mentioned to the judge whom did nothing about it?? Mike & Ann.

AUGUST 12 2012 Phone call to mothers sister Rhoda release
Listen to a thank you call for sending a birthday card to mum. Rhoda who lives in Southern Ireland is my mums sister whom you will hear states on this call she does not want to see Ann sent off to a home!

AUGUST 12 2012 Phone call to mothers sister Kathleen
Listen to a thank you call for sending a birthday card to mum. Mums other sister Kath who lives in London whom states that yes Mike you have done all the care why should there be a problem? Mum has other relatives whom side with her.

AUGUST 12 2012 Court hearing release
Listen to the SECOND hearing of the 6th July 2012 where Judge Jackson tries to claim that common law jurisdiction is not to be given in administrative hearings but upon hearing our refusal of consent he proceeds anyway.

AUGUST 9 2012 After waiting 11 years
Mum makes her will to start her 72nd birthday, without receiving any birthday cards or messages of happy birthday from her daughter and younger son. And here we publish it on August 12th. Read.

AUGUST 4 2012 Court hearing release
Listen to the first hearing of the 12th March 2012 where Judge Jackson tries to claim that consent is not required in administrative hearings but upon hearing our refusal of consent he proceeds anyway. Listen to his confirmation that he has read our position statement linked here confirming in writing that we do not consent but again he continues overiding our request for common law justice with equal piers to judge. Listen to the perversion of justice by trying to imply its my application when its my mothers. Note how he states he is acting on his oath of office that in fact is incompabtible (link to Read) to the terms of the oath where statute legislation is concerned. Note where he refers that really he has not got the time for this case and that nor is their sufficient money and he states in reality there are bigger problems elsewhere to deal with! Note how he promises a proper investigation but yet at the end he hands back the evidence dossier. Note how he states to forget the fact its a special visitor! Note how he will again state he has other things to be getting on with but that yes he is concious that my mother s life is ticking away but yet this application drags on and on from November 2011! Take also note that a mother with 4 doctors reports stating her capacity and that how the Judge from the 'BAR' can judge the deputy another member of the 'BAR' as doing no wrong and that he has seen or heard nothing in these appearances to indicate anything wrong. He continues to claim my mothers incapacity with only the one court doctor in his slight favour on only one issue. How can 4 reports against 1 win? Is their court bias and why? We will publish the recent court hearing of the 6th July 2012 where it can clearly be seen to demonstrate complete ambiguity and where if one reads between the lines something has happened after leaving that courtroom to sway the judges view that took nealry one month, in where if it had been as requested a common law court of equal piers, that would not have transpired!! Conclusion CORRUPTION

AUGUST 2 2012
Read about applications to appeal to the supreme court.

AUGUST 1 2012
Response updated 05.08.12 to Judge Jackson that we intend to appeal to the Supreme Court with an initial statement of response enclosed.

JULY 31 2012 Judges AMBIGUOUS Order
Read the long awaited Judge Jacksons deliberation. Yet another major blow for my mother and me!!! Only one word to describe the £5000 procedure, as, ambiguous!!

JULY 30 2012 Channel 4 TV
Listen to a 46 minute telephone conversation with Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh today at lunchtime.

JULY 30 2012 Channel 4 TV
Read contact today with Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh whom now wants the statement up date.

JULY 28 2012 Mother & Son that will not be seperated by statute controls - as we stand under the Magna Carta

JULY 28 2012 John Harris of TPUC

JULY 28 2012 Guy Taylor Vs Corrupt Judges 18th April 2012

JULY 28 2012 AnaJinn
Read how the priminister ignores and does nothing about letters of complaint. "There are no risk management procedures because, with no accountability, there is no risk. The same applies for the professional Deputies. There is no accountability because there is no due process, and therefore no recourse."

JULY 2012
Read about A Petition
Thursday 9 February 2012
Presented Petition presented to the House but not read on the Floor
Mentally Incapacitated Persons (Rights of Carers to Financial Information)
The Petition of Antoinette Mary Tricker,

JULY 28 2012 DOLs
Read about deprovation of liberty orders scandal!

JULY 28 2012 Channel 4 Yesterday making further enquiries with all
Hi,
Phil passed your details to me.
We are very interested in investigating the corruption within the court of protection.
I have read the emails you have sent to Phil and was wondering if you had an connections with families who are fighting for their rights in the court of protection?
Could you pass my details to them, or ask them to contact me with regard to their stories?
Let me know as soon as you can if this is possible as we are keen for this to progress.
My details are bronagh_walsh@hotmail.com and my number is 07795620236.
Bronagh Walsh of Channel 4 TV

JULY 28 2012 The Law Society Understanding with Police
Read about the understanding between the police and the law society!

JULY 27 2012 PANNONE EMAIL RESPONSE
Read

JULY 27 2012 Roger of the family Hayes - Contact via Skype
[09:24:23] roger of the family hayes: Hi Mike - I am currently working on a private prosecution against the whole Birkenhead Magistartes court - or key officials - because they are collectively denying us justice en mass - you might like to do the same for your stuff. The principle here of course is that the legal profession are treating the court system as a personal feifdom and making judgements to benfeit their own fraternity... without the safeguards of a jury. I'll keep you posted
[09:33:33] Michael of the family Clarke: yes please do! I am very interested and very keen to do just the same so please keep me up to date and informed.. Mike

JULY 26 2012
Read ABOUT the DARK CABAL & how "All Truth passes thru three stages: First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident." ~ Arthur Schopenhauer Perhaps the British Court of Protection Racket and the Office of Public Gaurdianship should be dealt with this way

JULY 26 2012 PANNONE email
eMAIL TODAY from PANNONE referring to weekly payments or should I say the lack of!!

JULY 25 2012 Declaration of Independance
A new initiative to re-assert the Magna Carta as a declaration of independance from 'statute systems of injustice' is to be announced soon, called, Magna Carta 2015, by the British Constitution Group. We support such initiatives here, whole heartedly.

JULY 24 2012 Friend Gordon's Birthday
celebration in Benalmedina curry restaurant for his 29th followed by entertainment at the Bonanza Bar with the MyKool Buble tribute act by our other friend Tony Montanna.

JULY 23 2012 Roger Hayes live on UK Column
Released from prison where he served 21 days unlawfully!!

JULY 22 2012
Read about court of protection advice & a link to Read about LPA's.

JULY 19 2012 GUY TAYLOR ON COMMON LAW X2

JULY 19 2012 Kidnap of children!!
What about our elderly!! Is no-one caring about those kidnaps!!
Read about it NOW!

Why do you think we live in exile?? Waiting to find out what the state thinks it might have in store for my mother, which trust me, will not take place whilst I breath! Whilst HUGH JONES still holds back funds he owes me from nearly a year ago of £4000, he hords it, to now pay for "his state sponsored terrorism meetings" on how to inflict further pain and discomfort on the elderly, all in the interest of plundering that persons remaining asset, trying to stop the elderly person from displacing that property to where it should rightfully go! Who has incapacity? Remind me again? For those whom trespass against us shall indeed experience the same!!

JULY 18 2012 Dinner out

tonight with our guests Gordon, Laura and Jessica here with us on holiday for 10 days, and as the night wore on so did the funny photos.

JULY 18 2012 Mother still patiently
waiting for a response from Judge Jackson, been 12 days now. Today also is the 1 year old meeting with HUGH JONES in which was recorded where he indicated selling my mothers property here to listen to. And also a brief transcription Read

JULY 12 2012 Email to HUGH JONES & OPG
Read yesterdays email to Hugh Jones & OPG re detailed accounts, outstanding monies owed and weekly payments not responded to, in fact not responded to any of it.

JULY 11 2012 Facebook entries

JULY 10 2012 Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman
Read the signed request for PHSO investigation into these allegations that the OPG has failed to do. Sent today.

JULY 10 2012 Release of the full statement
click here to the court on Friday 06.07.2012 in my mother's application to be released from the Court of Protection. Our fight to set mum free and to gain some justice we had to turn to the Magna Carta Act s39 and the Bill of Rights and claim common law jurisdiction in court on the 06.07.2012 and we are still awaiting deliberation. Take note that in court it was mentioned that this hearing has probably cost my mother in excess of £5000, yes £5000 to hold such a hearing where upon without any representation was to be accepted and the whole process flawed from start to finish in which my mother has to pay for!! Add the £5000 to the £127,000 that the deputy has removed in undisclosed charges and add to that the claim of mal administration of exchange rate losses exceeding £100,000 we are at an overall cost to my mother of £232,000 without any forensic analysis of the entire £1.1 million that has gone through the hands of the deputy? Alarming isn't it! When you consider how many more years mother might of been in funds had it not of been for the frauds committed against her all in the name of
THE COURT OF PROTECTION.

JULY 8 2012 In the court waiting area
Manchester High Court Events 06.07.2012
In the waiting area of the court the deputy HUGH JONES came over to say;
HJ-“There is every indication that your application today will fail and so we have to talk money”
MC-“Sorry, I don’t understand”
HJ-“Well I need to know the number of lodgers in the house and how much income you are generating?
I already have an order to sell the house anyway!”
MC-“if – today fails we will be straight to the Supreme Court on appeal”
HJ-“Oh I doubt very much they will give you leave to appeal”
MC-“I said we’ll see”
The audacity of this man is unreal and the gut feeling of his confidence comes from his association with the establishment and his closeness to the visible corruption of his friends, that's ongoing. It is for sure a solicitors first and foremost consideration that he has the 1st duty to the court, as they come 1st, he the solicitor comes 2nd and the client or patient comes way down the list 3rd! The lies he states in court shows that the truth is no defence, the process is built around who tells the best story, no one cares about the truth! It's a system that makes your stomach turn. It also revolves around honour and dishonour staying in honour is the way forward even though what one might be saying is an absolute lie! The more one reads about the statute adminstrative system the more you see its all a game, a game of corruption! Where in reality the one who displays the most honour regardless of the lies is more likely to win his case. Its all completely different in a common law court where the truth there does play more relevance or at least thats my take on it. It is no wonder we are sliding into a revolution of civil unrest! I do believe if Mr Hugh Jones stated what he stated in court "under oath" I hold the evidence to show perjury. His whole arguement was based on my mother staying in Spain when he knows only too well her desire to live in her home in Blackpool but yet he presented a case based around the sale of the house and so conveniently omitted the fact of her desire to live in her bungalow to create a convenience for the court and the Judge to potentially sell it! His tactics are so low down, down in the dirt, he also could not give any answer to the clear violations of Mental Capacity Act 5 where the protection of a carer from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a patient as in our case where he is completely harassing the carer for sums in excess of probably £50,000 in his court costs to a fraudulent harassment charge in order to attempt to prevent the enforcement of a claim against his company associates under common law. For what they do, these people should hang! We are ordinary common folk whom are soveriegn flesh and blood souls that have trusted in the system to serve and protect, what a sham! It has not only robbed from my mother financially it has stolen part of her life, it has stolen a large portion of mine, it has destroyed family relationships to open wounds so wide they will never recover and yet there is no recourse, no proper complaint system in place to protect, NONE! VERY SAD.

JULY 8 2012 What ROGER HAYES is all about
This seminar was conducted in our home town of Blackpool in March this year. We, my mother and I have sought common law jurisdiction for Justice because we sincerely believe statute law is destroying our rights.

JULY 8 2012 Habias Corpus Application for Roger Hayes FAILS

JULY 7 2012 Awaiting Honourable Judge Justice Jackson
to deliver the finale, but mum having waited 11 years to sort out her affairs, I suppose a few days won't be so devastating.

July 6 2012 REPORT FOR HIGH COURT 10.30
READ THE COURTS OWN DOCTORS REPORT

July 6 2012 High Court Manchester 10.30
Mothers application to be released from the fraudster/thief and mal administration clutches of solicitors PANNONE LLP s HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES to get on with her remaining short life at the age of 72. This application started last year and the process is slowly driving my mother to the grave!

Today July 5 2012 Roger Hayes
Of the British Constitution Group application for Habeas Corpus being submitted this morning at 10 am as below witnesses required to attend, I informed the BBC TV Nicola Dowling and Channel 4 TV Bronagh Walsh to check out this website for details.

Roger Hayes 4 July 2012
CALLING ON ANYONE IN THE MANCHESTER AREA
Roger Hayes was visited in prison this morning by Danny Bamping, who took an affidavit from Roger in which he makes it clear he received no summons or invitation to the hearing which resulted in the arrest warrant being issued. Roger also makes it clear he was given no opportunity to speak at the unlisted secret court hearing - a hearing which lasted just long enough to the judge to utter the sentence.
Danny and his team will submit an application for Habeas Corpus tomorrow morning, at the High Court in Manchester, which can be found in the new "Civil Justice Centre".
The application will be heard under "Supreme Court Order 54".
The hearing is at 10am, Thursday 5th July 2012 and we would like to ask that as many people as possible turn up to witness the application and support Danny and his team.
Roger (and we) would also like to express his/our appreciation for the fantastic support.

Fraud Act 2006
Fraud by who? Guess!
(1) A person is guilty of fraud if in breach of any of the sections listed in subsection
(2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).The sections are—
(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation) HUGH JONES
(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information) HUGH JONES
(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position) HUGH JONES
(3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable—
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or to both).
Fraud by Abuse of Position - Aggravating or mitigating Factors
1. The amount involved.ie in this case £200,000
2. The use to which money was put (spending on luxuries more venal than on necessities).- Hiself
3. Breach of position trust, such as by employee, director or trustee. RECEIVER, IN WHICH DID IN ABUNDANCE
4. Elderly or vulnerable victim. YES my mother
5. Extent of loss - Intended and Actual. INTENDED
6. Extent of gain - Intended and Actual. INTENDED
7. The period over which, and the persistence with which, the fraud was carried out. 11 YEARS
8. Guilty plea. DOUBTFUL WITH HIS MANIPULATION FRIENDS IN THE JUDICIARY
9. Voluntary repayments. NONE
10. Personal factors such as illness, disability, family difficulties, etc.

July 4 2012 Accounts 2011-2012
Arrive and clearly demonstrate more fraud and theft from my mothers funds. Charges Amounting to over £13000 dividing into weekly charges of £260 to create all that misery and a charge of £984 for professional fees that my mother had to borrow from me to pay for another solicitor to engage with the receiver to gain 10 years accounts that he had refused to supply over the years. Considering the onus was on him and that the refusal to supply information is considered fraud why has he deducted this fee from my mothers funds when he was the person that created the fraud in the first place but yet he charged my mother for the expense!! It's easy to do this is it not when you hold all that control over someone else whilst his friendships with Judicial Dictators can with ease deny a patients access to justice in a removal of due processes of law that are my mothers inherent rights. The friendships Hugh Jones holds in high places facilitates such corruption with ease that my mother furiously does no longer want that man to continue to blight her life causing the suffering he continues to do in harassing her son etc with more fraud based charges in the ignorance to the Mental Capacity Act section 5 supposedly protecting her carer son of 16 years where the obvious objective is to incarcerate him via his judicial friendships and to deny him his inherent rights to trial by jury and then in which he can continue his fraud and thefts with impunity over my mother thrusting her into a care home whilst he sells her home as fast and as cheap as possible. Nice little plot of collusion and conspiracy but with underlieing deep flaws where it will not succeed. As my mother and I fear the worst that might come we have planned the what if scenario and in no way will she be kept and retained in a care home when there are waiting in the wings others whom have vowed to take care of her abroad if the inevitable collusion of fraud by Hugh Jones manages to succeed & where the removal of my liberty is concerned he will certainly not remove my mothers, or her property.

July 4 2012 A question of sovereinty
Read the article from free the planet.net on a question on sovereinty.

July 4 2012 Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman
Read the Letter from Parliamentary Health & Service Ombudsman.

July 3 2012 Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman
A long telephone call today from PHSO whom want more details of the complaint about the handling of matters or should I say the lack of, by the Office of Public Guardian. The PHSO have decided to make further investigative inquiries on the whole matter with specific focus on some of the more serious concerns that were today highlighted on the phone with follow up letters, signed by my mother.

Update on the Arrest of a HERO, Roger Hayes
We have just learned that Wirral Council, having issued proceedings against Roger Hayes for non payment of Council Tax, recently decided to enact their right for a Committal Hearing against Roger for his continued non-payment.
Article | July 3, 2012 - 1:35pm On Tuesday 26 June 2012 a Committal Hearing took place at which Wirral Council state that Roger failed to appear.
As a result the Judge issued a bench warrant for his arrest, and Roger was arrested yesterday morning. The Council spokesman either did not know or refused to name the Judge.
Following his arrest Roger was brought before a Magistrate and sentenced to 21 days. The Council spokesman either did not know or refused to name the Magistrate, and was unable to say how much, if any, notice of either hearing was given to the General Public.
At this point we would like to make a correction to our initial press release, and that is:
Roger Hayes "WITHELD" his Council Tax rather than "refused to pay" as we reported. This has important implications in his legal case.
The most important fact in Roger's arrest, trial and imprisonment is that nobody knows the detail of what happened to him. What were the names and numbers of the police officers? What was the Court? What was the number of the case? Who was the Magistrate or Judge? Were any public present to see justice being done?
Roger was arrested at home and 9 hours later he was in prison, on the decision of one Magistrate. This must be yet another very dangerous example of the rise of the 'secret' courts and 'secret justice' - Kenneth Clarke MP is still pushing for yet more Courts without Juries.
Calls to the police and Liverpool prison where he is being held, have all been met with a wall of silence under the 'we can't say' and 'data protection'. We can see from this how yet more secrecy is introduced to keep the public interest at bay.
It is understood that the police have received many calls - one member of the public had the phone slammed down on him when he mentioned Roger's name.
Roger's family have also been refused direct information and access to him. They have now started the paperwork trail for formal permission to visit.
A former police officer has kindly made a number of pertinent points which we are happy to publish.
He was informed us that the prison would not confirm that Roger was with them for "security reasons". They referred him to the "Prisoner Location Service" on 0121 626 2773 - they would not accept verbal requests. Merseyside Police switchboard are also referring calls about Roger to the Council. This appears a highly dubious practice at law.
He states - "Because I wanted to make complaints I was put through to the police control room. The drill is for complaints to be recorded and then passed to an Inspector who will contact the complainant within 24 hours. My initial complaints are:
1. Was anyone informed of Rogers arrest? The contingency plan was for him to get a message to me. Note that the prisoner does not get to make a phone call himself. This is a precaution against prisoners passing coded messages to their associates outside.
2. Merseyside police, according to various sources on the Internet, are claiming that "Data Protection" forbids them to confirm Rogers whereabouts. This appears highly dubious practice because a "Regulation" cannot be held to repeal or infringe a Common Law right.
3. Passing complaints about police actions to the Council is a breach of the Police Discipline Regulations and of confidentiality for the individuals who are being complained about. I believe the Police Federation will not like this abuse of process."
The UK Column is delighted to report that the story of Roger Hayes has gone UK and world wide. Many are asking us what can they do? Our first answer is to spread the word, highlighting the the seriousness of the secrecy and lack of transparency in the whole process. As an example another member of the public has asked these excellent questions:
"Was there a signed warrant (wet signature) and who authorised it if so:
- Was there any forced entry to the house and/or damage.
- Did the warrant remain at the house.
- Did they search the house. Did they take anything away, i.e. computer, files, phones, router etc.
- Did they leave an inventory at the house Were there any witnesses to the arrest.
- Was any force used on Roger, or anyone else in the house.
- Was he handcuffed. Was there any explanation to anyone else in the house. Is there any idea of the charge. Were the arresting officers 'sworn police officers,
- PCSO's, from another 'agency' with powers of arrest or privates, or a mixture.
- Did anyone get their names or collar numbers.
- Did anyone get the name of the Prison Officer who called. If anyone could collate that, am sure his lawyers (or others) will want it, plus, it would provide good info for a follow up article"
Please ring the authorities yourself to hear their answers first hand. Every call is a point of support for Roger and shows the authorities the overwhelming public interest in the case. Please also write and ask for information and answers from Wirral Council and other authorities. As always be polite and measured in your calls and requests for information - unfortunately the authorities may not treat you with the same respect. As soon as we have more information we will post it. For those that want to write to Roger we will post his Prison Number as soon as we have it.
Merseyside Police Tel: 101 local or +44 (0)151 709 6010 in UK.
Liverpool Prison Tel: +44 (0)151 530 4000
Crimestoppers (UK only) Tel: 0800 555 111
--
If you would like to write to Roger with your support, you can write to him at:
HMP Liverpool, 68 Hornby Road Liverpool L9 3DF
His prisoner number is: A8953CP
--
Join us for a special UK Column Live broadcast tomorrow, Wednesday, 4th July at 12PM BST:

blog | July 2, 2012 - 10:38pm
At 0930 this morning, in scenes reminiscent of Stasi East Germany, 2 police cars and 4 policemen from Merseyside Police arrested British Constitution Group Chairman Roger Hayes at his Wirral home and drove away.
The first his family heard of him was at 18:30 this evening via a telephone call from a Warder in Liverpool prison, to say that Roger had been tried and sentenced to prison.
At no time were the family or any other members of the public informed of his arrest, and it is understood that he was tried in a secret court without a Jury.
Denied the right to argue his case, denied the right to a Jury, denied the right for the public to see justice being done, Roger was imprisoned in the secretive gulag system that Britain has become in 2012.
Roger's "crime" is that he has been refusing to pay his Council tax, because along with other state taxes, a proportion of the tax revenue gathered is being sent to the European Union, used to fund unlawful wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, and promote terrorism right around the world. To pay tax under these circumstances is, at the very least, unlawful under Section 15(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000.
As such the present government of UK in Westminster is complicit to terrorist action and war crimes and therefore the payment of taxes to an unlawful, criminal regime is itself a criminal act - one in which Roger refused to participate.
The state has never forgiven him for the arrest of Judge Peake at Birkenhead court as part of this campaign.
In addition to his stance on taxes for unlawful purposes, Roger has also been campaigning for the Lawful Bank - a monetary initiative in which money can be issued to the public as credit, rather than as crippling debt under the existing corrupt and fraudulent International Monetary System.
As Chairman of the British Constitution Group, Roger Hayes has been an outspoken public speaker warning the British public that their rights and freedoms under Common Law and the Constitution are being stripped away and replaced by a dictatorship of secret courts operating under Administrative and Statute Law.
There is no doubt that his success in alerting ever more people to the dangers of the British / EU dictatorship being built by a criminal element now masquerading as British politicians, has caused the state to imprison Roger. His challenge to the fraudulent banking system, as evidenced by the criminal acts of Barclays bank and todays resignation by arch Bilderberger and BBC advisor Marcus Agius, will also have made Roger enemies within Britain's wide criminal banking cabal.
Roger's family is shocked both at his arrest, and at the realisation that Britain is now sliding into a police state, where husbands, fathers and other good people can be lifted off the streets and imprisoned. There is now no doubt that Britain is further under the control of domestic terrorists in Westminster.
We ask that all those who value their freedoms and liberty call Meryside Police for further information and an explanation of their actions, and also call Liverpool prison to establish Roger's physical safety and well-being.

JULY 1st 2012 1130pm Manchester Airport
Waiting for us at the Airport tonight was PANNONEs LLP henchmen - document servers - Global Servers where upon we where harassed by them to accept documents to the Legal Fiction Person/Entity/Corporation Mr Michael Clarke. The server was told that is not me and he said it is. I said no it's not, it's the legal fiction person and that is not me. He said I will throw them onto the ground here in Manchester Airport if you do not take them from me. I repeated that is not me and so the rest is up to you. He then threw the documents onto the floor where upon they where left, unserved! I have previously written to PANNONE stating that all correspondence must be addressed to Mike of the family Clarke and that this was faxed upon them as a notice and that all correspondence not addressed properly will not be accepted. Blacks law dictionary states that a person is an entity as in a corporation and as I stated in the beginning I am a flesh and blood man with a soul whom refuses consent to be governed by legislative statute rules and without such consent carrys no lawful force, NO CONTRACT - NO CASE. I do not consent, I never did, I am not the legal fiction corporation and without my consent statute regulation carries no authority or has no claim over me. I have waived all the benefits and I claim as I have continued to do common law jurisdiction in these matters where a jury court with equal piers is acceptable. This matter arose out of Pannone s LLP corruptly using my mothers bank account to track my where abouts flouting data protection acts and article 8 of human rights, entitlement to a private life.
The PANNONE LLP henchmen were also trying to serve to the legal fiction a STATUTORY DEMAND presumeably for a substantial amount of money!!! Money that a carer for 16 years of my mother does not have or ever likely to have.
The matter was recorded as it was expected and 2 witnesses watched the encounter.

JULY 1st 2012 Proposed Draft - Opening Position
Statement for the court on the 6th July 2012.

JULY 1st 2012 Judge Jackson Article
Read an article by Judge Jackson in particular page 5 paragraph 3 line 7 referring to where P (Ann) must have a voice & also next paragraph 4 line 4 referring to lengthy court cases and that time is of the essence and the person is entitled to some security and stability in the latter stages of the their life. To remain embroiled in lengthy court proceedings is undesireable. Line 11 refers to a jointly agreed expert! All this, flying in the face of current events hapenning to my mother. The most serious part of the article on the last page 8 paragraph 2 line 9 The subject (Ann) of the proceedings must lack capacity in order for the court to establish jurisdiction! Clearly not the case here and certainly not proved at all beyond all reasonable doubt.

JUNE 29 2012 DO NOT CONSENT. WAIVE ALL BENEFITS.

JUNE 29 2012 NO CONTRACT. NO CASE!

JUNE 29 2012 NO CONTRACT. RETURN TO SENDER.

JUNE 29 2012 YOUR CAR DE REGISTRATION

JUNE 27 2012 Cestui Que Vie Act 1666
In the year of the plague and the great fire of London parliament enacted a new act, behind closed doors, whilst people were still putting out the flames.. Ask yourself, Are you DEAD? Read about it here & THE ACT

JUNE 27 2012 DONATION ACCEPTED
with the sincerest of thanks to you Jamie and your family every single donation no matter how small or large, whether its £1, £10, £100 or what ever it is, every penny helps us to continue our fight against this corrupt system thats ruining countless lives. THANK YOU again. Read our email to Jamie

JUNE 26 2012 STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Letter sent to Dr Waite that is not to be revealed until the court hearing of the 6th July 2012

JUNE 26 2012 Accounts requested
Read about the accounts requested yet again?

JUNE 23 2012 James's Mum
Taken at our villa in the hills of Malaga yesterday on a flying visit and reveals further harassment and intimidation from Pannones document servers whom had arrived at their home looking for us apparently and where upon they grilled James's father as to his where abouts in which his father stated he did not know as he had not spoken to his son for 3 years!

JUNE 23 2012 Dinner Party
To celebrate the visit of James's mum in aid of his 21st this week, left to right, Mum, Lynda, Michele, James, Jonathon, David and me. Taken at 9pm at the restaurant in the hills of Malaga.

JUNE 21 2012 Email to Judge Jackson Hugh Jones & OPG
Read an email of objection to the court and to the Judge

JUNE 20 2012 Party on the beach
For James 21st Birthday, table for 10 please! Mum at head of the table at LA MORAGA beach restaurant in Torremolinous today celebrating with James and his new pet dog Benjy. Fabulous afternoon with Terri Fox and company Jonathon and Lynda etc.

JUNE 20 2012
Read the latest order by Judge Jackson.

JUNE 20 2012
Read the temporary report made by Dr Waite.

JUNE 20 2012 COURT TRANSCIPT
Read a requested email copy of the court transcript from the judge's order of the 12th March 2012. We wish to check the transcript against our own copy. Read reply.

JUNE 19 2012 Email to Judge Jackson
Sent today to Judge Jackson an email requesting clarification on what order he has drafted that was due on the 08.06.2012 and that can we be informed by email due to exile in case we need to appeal to the supreme courts.

JUNE 19 2012 Fishing Email
Read an email exchange with HUGH JONES trying to get us to divulge information that my mother refuses consent to give within her rights of having GOD given capacity sanctioned by 4 doctors reports.

JUNE 19 2012

Read about governments, THAT are not GOD! We have rights! HUMAN ONEs!

JUNE 16 2012 Get to know your STRAWMAN (160 pages)
MEET YOUR STRAWMAN & find out about your other half, and the deception behind the legal fiction of your birth certificate. Find out about how to control him and put him right back in his box! This is a must read for those wanting to take back their own sovereinty in a world fast becoming dictative slavery once again! Understand you! Stop taking the punishment you don't deserve! Don't need! Don't want & more importantly, do not have to have!

JUNE 16 2012 Class Action Ponderment
Hello Mike
Good reply to the anonymous mail. I came back to the UK couple of days back.
Others have spoke of bringing a class action before. One of the problems seems to be that almost every one I have spoken with say that once the Cof P is raised as the problem no one seems to be able to get qualified lawyers to represent their case. I have read that in the USA at least three lawyers who have tried standing-up against the probate courts there have then had their licence to practice revoked.
It was good to talk to you again. I have been pondering since then what possible course of action we have against these predatory criminals. Clearly the UK legal profession cannot be entrusted with our Courts of Law, they have become a waste of time to seek justice if the issues involve that C of P and its patrons.. If you like we can meet up again.
X

JUNE 16 2012 Local Outdoor Charity Event
Taken at our local restaurant in the hills me mum n James enjoying a late evening meal with entertainment last night.

JUNE 15 2012 OPG BOARD email on Corruption
Read a copy of email correspondence to Peter Hofshoer in exile with his mother in Austria whom is in correspondence with the Board of the OPG a Nicola Gowans and what she has had to say about corruption!!

JUNE 15 2012 Email from Hugh Jones
Read the latest email/croc of shit from HUGH JONES containing lies, deceit, bribery, blackmail & various mentions of breaches of several acts, that HUGH JONES cares not about, backed by his corrupt judicial dictatorship better described as the British Mafia!

JUNE 15 2012 Email from Attorney General about Treason
Read reply from Attorney Generals office stating they cannot investigate offenses of Treason and suggest reporting it to the Police!! I wonder what took so long for them to reply?? I wrote to them on the 9th May 2012 a total of 36 days to tell you they don't investigate! Is it not strange how no one wants to investigate anything??

JUNE 15 2012 Letter from OPG Re Accounts
Read Reply from Sonya of OPG investigations to state that last years accounts have not yet been released.

JUNE 14 2012 LINKS repaired
Sorry for any inconvenience of any links in this site that did not work we have today repaired all links that were disrupted by the move from domain to domain and hosting services also as a result of PANNONE s LLP s attempted disruption to try and pervert the course of justice in this very matter which I might add has failed! Any links you may discover that are not functioning on this site please report it directly to my email address and I will endevour to fix it within an hour, mike@rake.net

JUNE 14 2012 eMAIL TO Honourable Judge Justice Peter Jackson
Read the email to Judge Jackson

JUNE 13 2012 Anonymous comment left today on our new site
I’ve been reading your website for the last year or so with interest. Sometimes you seem to make a decent point and then next you seem to go off on a crazy rant. This ‘Michael of the family Clarke’ stuff is embarassing, making out the court orders aren’t for you as your name isn’t Mike Clarke, embarassing. If the court saw in your favour and gave you your 9 million pounds (Another crazy thing the idea you will get 9 mill) how will you cash the cheque as it won’t be made out to ‘Mike of the Family Clarke’ ? You cannot tell Pannones how you’ve survived the last 10 years or so as a carer, you just want to milk your poor mother’s money. Rent Mercedes (Why not a cheaper car?), try to start up a business in Spain, just milking your poor mothers money. I just hope you dont get your hands on her house as that seems to be your main aim. Disgusting. The whole world is not against you, it’s you. You seem to be losing your mind. If the court ruled in your favour and fined Pannones 25k (Rather than the other way round) you wouldn’t think the courts were corrupt would you ? You’re like a little child who moans when he doesn’t get his own way. Must admit your website is fascinating yet frustrating seeing the way you simply wont give up. Mentioning that Norwegian killer previously as well was another sick thing to do.
AND MY REPLY
Thanks for your comment. I think if you experienced the problems I do then on occasion you might also go off on a crazy rant. Under the circumstances I think that’s justified.
With regard to Mike of the family Clarke STUFF as you say is simple really if you look into it all properly. In short its a revocation of your own legal fiction self, a discontinuation of the legal fiction contract that we all hold with the UK government unbeknown to us. It s about CONSENT and how we are all coerced into consent to be governed by any statute legislative rule. Under common laws and proper courts with Juries we were all protected easier and safely now all thats been eradicated to turn the system into a judicial dictatorship something which you personally may agree to but I certainly dont consent to.
That is me the grown up speaking not the child. You by consent to all that is a child and therefore needs that system to tell you what to do when where and how, in essence dictated to. Everything I have done for and with my mother is with her consent where all others do not have her consent and I might add she has capacity meaning that anyone delving into her affairs is committing fraud and theft.
The Mercedes car you talk of was not on rent, it was owned by my mother and prior to her accident and award drove just the same, Mercedes and or Jaguar, and I think this childish point you make matters not!
With regard to her house I have not been trying to get my hands on it. She has been trying to gift it. What goes around will come around and those that try to take away an older persons rights and choices are wholly wrong and are doing this to meet their own ends. In your case I would love to be a fly on the wall when you get to 72 and your own situation might play into the same hands, how will you feel when you cannot do with your own property what you wish to.
You obviously are a selfish thoughtless person whom I consider is related or attached to the pannone side of things to give such a view here thats clearly one sided not giving one ounce of consideration for my mothers wishes. You are a PREDATORY GUARDIAN in the making but I would suggest the role is a declining one in which will in due course have its commupence.
My mind is fully intact and thats why I have acted accordingly to protect my mothers basic human rights to choose. Incidentally your little rant appears very similar to a rant by email last year by a Peter Jones whom of which I published on the site and its a shame that your annonymity displays your cowardice on this matter and I suspect you have a hidden agenda to say the least.
Last but not least the Norwegian killer Anders Breviek that was mentioned is a clear example how the Judicail corrupt dictatorship that we are now living under is the type of matter that creates such depravity of evil, simply because justice is not being done anymore. We are not on our own here. I am not alone there are hundreds of thousands suffering the same fate of, financial rape of the elderly. Is it your dad Peter, thats doing it. Are you HUGH JONES s son Peter?? I wonder!! By the way when I get the cheque for £9million can you see any bank refusing to open me an account in the name of Mike of the family Clarke, because I cant!!
Mike of the family Clarke Read the previous letter we believe is linked to the same person!!

JUNE 13 2012 Network Solutions
Read an email back from Network Solutions stating their re-instatement of our principle website, albeit delayed & censored.http://www.opg.me. This our main website has been down for two weeks and was attracting approximately 700 hits per week of traffic. We will over a period discover what damage it has done to our cause.

JUNE 13 2012 Statement
Pannone LLPs who work in the guardianship area recently said, You’ve gone over the line. I assume they were referring to my website and my obvious rage at the theft from my mother and the judicial assault on justice. In response, I would say the following: There is no line! The attorney guardians have obliterated the line between stealing and earning, the line between caring for and exploiting the elderly, the line between what my mother earned pound by pound and what the attorney guardian didn't earn, the line between right and wrong, as well as the line between greed and need. In addition to contributing to the above, the Court of Protection has mindlessly eradicated the line between law and lawlessness, the line between justice and injustice, the line between bias and impartiality, the line between expediency and diligence, and the line between what soldiers and taxpayers sacrifice for and what they get. The attorney guardians are bottom dwellers who owe their existence to Denzil Lush. Denzil Lush owes his existence to attorneys - the attorneys and judges (also attorneys) who compose the CoP on judicial conduct as well as to the attorneys who pass through his courtroom in utter silence, accepting the farce he offers as justice, even when they know it's wrong, and tolerating the "juristocracy" he has created to pad his ego - rationalizing and offering specious justifications so as to relieve themselves of the responsibility to act - to change - to refuse to accept. I haven't crossed the line. The line was destroyed by greed, by judicial perversion, and by spinelessness, long before I discovered the absence of demarcation. Most professions are founded on ideals. Over time those ideals change, expand, and even contract. That is as it should be. Unfortunately most professions also have a few who dirty those ideals: the architect who uses substandard materials putting at risk all who use the building, the educators who deliberately fail to note the signs of child abuse, and the attorneys who are silent with regard to judicial corruption and courtrooms that reek of depravity. There are many levels of "professionalism." Surely among the highest, the most profoundly "professional" are those who will do whatever it takes to rid the ranks of that which corrupts it.
There is rumblings today of bringing about a class action with all affected!

JUNE 13 2012 ACCOUNTS REQUESTED by MUM A YEAR AGO
Read a reminder from a year ago of mum requesting the full unhindered accounts that still have not been provided!

JUNE 13 2012
Email to Network Solutions threatening lawful redress.

JUNE 12 2012 The Launch of the
New Domain of www.courtofprotection.me.uk has gone live today. There will be other's as the week's progress, never again to be caught out by corrupt processes to hand where NETWORK SOLUTIONs have censored the original site www.opg.me at this moment in an unlawful move yet to be resolved.

JUNE 12 2012 MONTHLY FUNDS MISSING FOR 9 MONTHS
Email to HUGH JONES about monthly funds he has been with holding for the past 9 months and not re instated a total of £3600.

JUNE 12 2012 CORRUPTION ENQUIRY REQUESTED
Read A request by not just us, but other's exiled too, from the corrupt Office of Public Guradian, requesting a corruption enquiry!!

JUNE 12 2012 LIENS RECOGNISED BY PANNONES
Read about PANNONE s partner Richard Drinkwater, whom is one of our endebted partners within our own Commercial Lien/Claim to Read, against themselves at PANNONE s and his recognition of holders of liens where creditors such as us, "are authentic", where PANNONE s have openly claimed no recognition of "our commercial lien" against them or the Commercial Affidavit Process claiming its of no value. Can one clearly see the contradictions that are riddled in the company Pannone s, that is so called award winning, are the awards for contradiction. see the picture! Isn't it funny the minute a commercial lien is served upon them that they do not recognise it, so why did they fraudulently use harassement laws to try to curtail it! Probably spending, according to them in excess of £50,000. Was this action in effect recognition, of a perfected commercial lien? Seeing as this is turning out to be a trial by internet we will let you the public be the judge of this!

JUNE 12 2012 The Truth is no defence

Read about contempt of court!

JUNE 11 2012 HUMAN TRAFFICKING
Read about Human trafficking: It ain’t just for sex anymore & Read about the only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good people to do nothing! ANOTHER VICTIM!! http://www.guardianshipscam.com/ Definately one to read, it will make your eyes water!!

JUNE 11 2012
Read about predatory-guardians-how-courts-are-allowing-professional-guardians-to-rob-your-assets.

JUNE 11 2012 www.opposepredatoryguardians.com
Goes live today and by Thursday the release of the new look site will be upon it. The new site is going to be more user friendly for the public. It will allow feedback and blog facilities with the allowance of short comments from public views. It should be interesting!

JUNE 10 2012
Read email again to Network Solutions. 3 days have passed and no reply? Our main site suspended for 10 days for no reason (www.opg.me).

JUNE 10 2012 The Helplessness of Judges
The commercial lien, which is authorized both by the common law and by Title 15 of the United States Code (USC), is reportedly the same lien the IRS uses to take Americans’ homes and cars. However, some pro se litigants do not depend upon Title 15, but upon the common law of negotiable instruments (a.k.a. Commercial Law). As such, it’s almost impossible to remove a commercial lien without the approval of the individual claimant who filed the lien. Although a commercial lien can be challenged by a common law court or by a 7th Amendment jury trial, it does not require a court process or a court judgment for its establishment, validity, or execution. Therefore, it appears that the courts may not be able to simply extinguish this lien on their own discretion (or on motion from the lien debtors) without the voluntary approval of the person who filed the lien. Traditionally, these liens can only be removed by the voluntary decision of the person who filed the lien, by the decision of a constitutional common-law jury trial, or by waiting 99 or 100 years. Since the common law has been smothered in the UK & U.S.A., all judges are essentially powerless to overcome the liens.
A Powerful Weapon
The Commercial Affidavit Process — or "CAP" — is perhaps one of the most powerful devices available to the common man for righting wrongs and accomplishing justice. The process is not new, as some may believe. At its foundation are the laws of commerce which spring from the eternal, immutable Laws of God, and those laws have been in force since the beginning of human existence. Provoke the use of the Commercial Affidavit Process against you and you provoke the wrath of all that is just and right. Today, those who are availing themselves of the CAP system are equipping themselves with a very powerful equalizer. Make no mistake! The CAP is a very lethal weapon in the war against injustice. It is capable of righting wrongs while eliminating the "cost factor" that deprives thousands of people from getting justice. The expression "equal under the law" again has real meaning, thanks to CAP. When the CAP methodology is properly loaded and sighted on a wrongdoer, success is "as good as in the bag." The Process is powerful and dangerous to those who are in the line of fire. There is no escape: either acquiesce and justly recompense or suffer the awful consequences. And, those consequences can be calamitous as will be shown.
Did DAVID bring down GOLIATH - Thense so shall Ann of the Clarke family bringeth down PANNONE LLP alongside HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES.

JUNE 10 2012
Read another request for accounts!

JUNE 9 2012
Email from MP Gordon Marsden confirmimg he last week did dispatch the signed forms by him, to go to the parliamentary ombudsman. We await the outcome. We claim that the Office of Public Guardian is not fit for purpose.

JUNE 8 2012
Email to Channel 4 Television about the making of a TV program soon!

JUNE 8 2012 Hell hath no fury like a woman SCORNED!!
Advert to be placed. Mother is now determined that this advert be placed in various media seeing as she is not being given her rights in the UK and that her so called guardian HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES is persecuting her to gain possesion of her home in order to incarcerate mum into a CARE home. Dispatched to London Gazette and Manchester Evening News to start with!

JUNE 8 2012 1 year ago JULY 18 2011
Read the transcript of the recording. Can I draw your attention to section 1, 21 & 23 where HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES clearlys states that 1> He does not mind being recorded 21>He clearly states post it all on the website & 23> again he says, "post what you like on the website" Now correct me if I am wrong but, is that or is that not a clear and concise authority from PANNONEs LLP HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES to record and post what ever I like!

JUNE 8 2012 FACEBOOK ENTRY

JUNE 7 2012
Email finally from Network Solutions and our reply.

JUNE 7 2012
Read further email to NETWORK SOLUTIONS referring to another Judges order that specifically states under paragraph 13 that reference must be made to the website of www.opg.me under section 13 of the order that cannot now be carried out until re-instatement of the site!

JUNE 7 2012
Read letter sent to JUDGE JACKSON

JUNE 6 2012
Email to network solutions again requesting a response!

JUNE 5 2012
Read further information sent to NETWORK SOLUTIONS

JUNE 5 2012 BLOG / Feedback Forum
Being added so as to HAVE YOUR SAY!

JUNE 5 2012 PANNONE to NETWORK SOLUTIONS
Take note in the letter the enquiry by Network Solutions as to why the Judges order is not signed!! Read letter to ISP from HUGH JONES & PANNONE. Read Schedule from the court. Read the "so called" order from the court.

JUNE 5 2012 Transfer of domains blocked!!
Read how an attempt to transfer all domains out of Network Solutions is currently being blocked.

JUNE 4 2012 WEBSITE SUSPENSION & CENSORSHIP
Whilst negotiations continue with Network solutions over the unlawful suspension of our website which we are beginning to consider as theft of paid for services, we continue with this our back up service ending in .UK HUGH JONES of PANNONE s again conspires to cover up his misgivings by coercing Network Solutions into believing they have a lawful and enforceable court order & to force closure of the website.

JUNE 1 2012
Read our letters to NETWORK SOLUTIONS in connection with the suspension of our website OPG.ME tonight at 9pm. Fortunately this our sister site OPG.ME.UK is a back up & our hosting platform now changed!

JUNE 1 2012 Taken this afternoon
Our 1st of June lunch photograph taken today at El Bichito Restaurante El Grande Spain with friends Cheryl and John. Mum showing her enjoyment at being a FREE "SOVEREIGN" human being, to do as she pleases without being in the chains of the (UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION) of Judicial Dictatorship & corruption. There might be corruption in Spain but at least its more visible than in the UK and we will say something for Spain they do look after their families!!

JUNE 1 2012 SRA
Response from the SRA Solicitors Regulatory Authority conduct of investigation into HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES & PANNONE LLP.

May 31 2012 When in doubt, CHILL OUT!
Whilst we comtemplate the situation we find ourselves in we must retain the sense of fun and freedom, that is what life is all about... a freedom we believe my mother is entitled to... a basic reminder to our cause and what this is all about! An individuals choices are to be respected and especially where her capacity remains INTACT! This picture taken this afternoon at our residence in Malaga in which we repeatedly told various persons where we where, to which are none believers, relying on sources of data in connection with my mothers private banking facilities, that are being spied upon in breach of article 8 of Human Rights Act the entitlement to a private family life & not to mention the Data Protection Act also broken where PANNONE s HUGH JONES are openly supplying this information to third party DOCUMENT SERVERS & also a DR Waite in which it has nothing to do with them. What rights have they to do this?? The obstruction of the court order by PANNONES to an independant psychologist found by others in Liverpool is openly proved on this website with evidence via recorded conversations. The situation remains in a diabolical state of affairs when in reality the truth is that these vultures need to incarcerate my mother in a care home in order to facilitate the sale of her property something she has repeatedly told them she does not want and yet they continue to put her and us through this whilst officialdom turns its back cowardly to the Mafia style Judicial Corrupt Dictatorship that goes about its business without any redress or protection in place to stop it!

May 31 2012
Read a response from the Office of Judicial Complaints and why they cannot investigate my complaints and that I must lodge appeals.

May 30 11:30pm 2012 Telephone call
From mother asking where I was. Be back soon I said. Those whom subscribe to the thoughts that mother does not have the capacity are so sadly mistaken. Before 3 independant witnesses to my phone ringing when mother was on her own that her capacity is as intact as its ever been at the age of nearly 72 she can pick up the phone and ring you to ask when will you be back? Its absurd what the courts and others are doing to her remaining life, restraining and stopping and preventing her from her wishes, in breach of all written Mental Capacity Act Rules with impunity! These people need hanging in my book!

May 30 2012
Read about THE BILL OF RIGHTS 1689

May 30 2012
Read about UK LANDMARK CASE!! The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited. No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority. That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

May 30 2012
It is time to claim Personal Sovereignty in the Courts and not Judge driven courts of no Constitutional Judicial Due Process, the courts are aggressively "moving forward" to complete the stripping away of Due Process, saying that it costs the state too much to defend indigent defendants or to allow jury trials. Arbitrate and Mediate most cases off the record and out of a courtroom. The attorneys say this "relieves the burden on the court" and "saves money". When asked Chief Justice ???? some years ago in a Hearing why there are no jury trials in FAMILY Court. He said he "did not really know, except that it would probably cost too much". So much for Due Process, so much for Constitutionally protected Inherent Rights or protection of Families. Keeping cases "out of constitutional courts" has filled the prisons with non violent "offenders", criminalized and incarcerated often without ever being charged with a Crime. Many prisoners have never had a trial, and with no oversight a DA stacks charges and coerces a "lesser plea", often after accusing some heinous crime for which there is no evidence, or unlawfully seized FAMILY or property are held hostage to compel guilty pleas. With mandatory sentencing, one event becomes "five felonies" and the person, often FAMILY, are sentenced to long prison sentences, often their only crime is that they are poor and vulnerable and trapped in the corrupted exploitive system, unable to extricate themselves. It is a carefully crafted attorney game, and the People must become aware that at this time no one can be sure FAMILY removed or prisoner incarcerated was allowed Due Process in court. This corrupt conspiracy has turned our nation into one of the most imprisoned population on earth. It's now a game punishment for profit. The only way to get the Truth past the attorneys and judges is to plead your case yourself, in your Lawful Sovereign capacity. You will learn that the Judges lie all the time and intentionally deceive you about your rights, so you must learn what those rights are and demand them, and only before the court Sui Juris will you be able to do this. An attorney's main job is to prevent confrontation on the record revealing any systemic corruption, to never "irritate the court", to bow and stand and make sure you do likewise, kissing up to the corrupt, tyrant judge ... the greedy attorney makes his living from your chaos, misery and fear and the bar wrote the rules they are using to exploit you .... the bar member attorney will block you from making the record of such facts as a Judge's lie. In order to confront this on the Record, you must plead your case yourself. You begin to see that this essential right of pleading your own case and accessing the Public Record and juries to decide the facts and the law is vital and the core of restoring and maintaining our freedom. To force a Natural Person to give up their rights in any court is TREASON, and these judges are to be held accountable BY THE PEOPLE. They are already stripping our FAMILY from us, criminalizing every act possible and now they are telling us when this happens we have no right to appeal what is done to us. Forced to be raped by a Whore for the Court and to swallow this without resistance. Parliament must act immediately to reverse these trends, and turn around this National Socialist Agenda that has overtaken our country, destroying our Constitution, and subverting our inalienable rights. The whole purpose of the Process we are sharing is to allow others to realize, as we did, that you CAN fight back, you CAN plead your own case and stop the agenda that has usurped the British Constitution at this time. Germany under Hitler was a Corporate Socialist State. Adolf said the State is the Parent of the Child. Any judge that acts as a judge in Family Court is presiding in an unconstitutional court and is therefore committing the crime of Trespass of Treason against your Civil Rights and against the Constitution - THE LAW OF THE LAND!
Read

May 29 2012 Channel 4 Television
Further contact today with Channel 4 Television confirming their intention to go ahead with the making of a program with regard to OPG/CoP so called "patients" with capacity. Anyone interested should contact Bronagh Walsh on 07795620236.

May 29 2012
Form sent to parliamentary ombudsman with letter from OPG & MP Gordon Marsden.

May 29 2012
Response dated 14th May 2012 from Office of Judicial Complaints taking up the complaint, ref 13071/13072/13073 of 2012.

May 28 11.30am 2012 Phone call
from Dr Waite the SPECIAL VISITOR from the court of protection claiming to be stood outside our Blackpool address wanting to see my mother in a fashion of harassment and intimidation. He stated that there is a window open and he implied we should open up the house in order for him to comply with Judge Jackson's court order. I told him there were lodgers in the property probably at work! I stated to him that I was in Malaga as can be seen by yesterdays photograph taken at our friends £2 million pound villa in Estapona and that he was specifically told to fly to Malaga where upon he would be collected from the airport to conduct his assessment. He then stated that I did not specifically state I was in Malaga so I said well, how would I be able to collect him from the airport if I was not in Malaga, was he implying I was a liar! He then said explain why is it your mothers visa card is being used in the UK, to which I stated that's none of your business. Under article 8 of the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT my mother is entitled to a private life clearly your co conspirators are in breach of article 8 to be spying on her. He said I was not complying with Jackson's court order I said the only person not complying with the unlawful order was HUGH JONES as they were the one's refusing the independent Doctor found by Psychology Direct, in Liverpool. Please can you explain I asked, for the terminology of "SPECIAL VISITOR" to be defined, as we see no difference in his expertise to the one found independently by Psychology Direct. He said he was trained expertly which would imply that other experts are not qualified, which we dispute. With channel 4 TV exposing "the scandal" of SPECIAL VISITORS, whom do you the public think we should trust?? The tone and content of Dr Waite's call was very demeaning and I would describe it also, as threatening, where he also tried talking over me as though he was talking to a child. He was of course given short shrift as I stopped him dead, saying "you think you are clever", as a sovereign flesh and blood man I asked "what are your qualifications on law?" "Particularly HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS!" Dr Waite ended the call!! Stating this is going no-where! Perhaps he should have considered that before arriving without appointment to an address he had previously been told we were not at - obviously he at that point decided I was a LIAR! Now, the questions that this begs, is, WHO PAID FOR HIS VISIT? I have a sneaking suspicion it will be my mother, under more fraudulent acts of theft! Read this link to the emails with Dr Waite and ask yourself did I clearly state we were living in EXILE as we feel safer from the potential removal of our CIVIL LIBERTIES and that should he fly to MALAGA we will collect him to conduct his assessment! The trouble with these people they are in breach of several HUMAN RIGHTS ACTs and clearly they do not care. They claim under the protection of Mrs Clarke they act but Mrs Clarke has capacity and choose's to be a free "SOVEREIGN" human being & make her own mind up!! Mrs Clarke would love to be able to gift her house to her son where upon he has stated his commitment for her to live in that house till the day she dies but that the Courts, HUGH JONES & Pannone s plus JUDGES are moving toward removing yet again her rights, then to sell her property and against her will place her into a care home in which she adamantly does not want to go!!

Clearly clutching at straws, and in this case it is straws, it is the strawman and or straw woman, where reference to a person is concerned. A person we, my mother and I are not! We are flesh and blood SOVEREIGNS We have by statement/affidavit denounced all connection to the strawman/person/legal fiction contract of the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION purely down to its firm commitment to injustice breach of HUMAN RIGHTS, breach of common laws of the land and it's shear unadulterated contribution to the construction of a JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP now clearly at hand & in CAHOOTS with the executive, conspiring to deny us, the lay people our common law rights under Magna Carta and the Bill Of Rights. They are in effect, enslaving us all, wilfully, by coercing our consent in matters where they can then act, as trustees. WAKE UP ALL!

May 25 2012
Read about our Tribe of the Phoenix - A New Human Era!

May 24 2012
Read about the Criminal Global Elite's influence and Lawful Rebellion.

May 24 2012
Read about the relationship between the Executive the Judiciary and the Government.

May 24 2012
Read how the PANNONE LLP s henchmen go about their dirty business of intimidating innocent people yesterday at 5pm. Apparently trying to serve the, as yet, un served court order! THIS IS THE UNLAWFUL, UNCONSENTED TO HEARING IN WHICH IS OF A NULL AND VOID VALUELESS DOCUMENT! Addressed to the legal fiction MICHAEL CLARKE and not Mike of the family Clarke! In threatening behaviour they intimidate BY HARASSMENT others for their own gain! The COURT was served paperwork to refuse consent to the hearing of 15 pages here but the judicial corruption juggernaut continue's using it's co conspirator HUGH JONES & Pannone LLP s as its vehicle to plough its way forward using FRAUD, HARASSMENT & INTIMIDATION to get what it wants! (the legal fiction) MICHAEL CLARKE!!! Currently a piece of paper!! A birth certificate!! A contract with another legal fiction!! (UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION).
NOT of course me! The sovereign flesh and blood human being that responds to only common laws of the land with jury's attached to them as is my sovereign right, which has been expressed and expressed in the face of full denial of due process by persons purporting to be JUDGE's that in fact are only so under consent of the governed!

May 23 2012
Read our reply to Hugh Jones.

May 23 2012
Email from Hugh Jones refusing fees request from my mother's own money so my mother can investigate a miscarriage of justice 11 years ago. Is their a conflict of interest again? Is the Executive protecting the Judiciary and likewise the Judiciary protecting the Executive? Yes we believe so and therefore an independent body of people are required!! OBVIOUSLY. Its commonly known as a conflict of interest and they are well aware of it. So if they are well aware of it then they are only too well aware why the use of the word CORRUPTION is correct and fair. Something which a jury would resolve, so remind me again, why are we not getting a jury?

May 23 2012 Legal Ombudsman
Have decided to investigate and given mother Case No: 201205737

May 23 2012
Read a letter back today from OPG investigations.

May 23 2012 Statute knowledge is
something to get to know about with your 'consent' upon your 'legal fiction' Read & watch. Get to know about Lawful Rebellion and article 61 Read. Educate yourself a little on the Treason Act 1351 Read. If we want real justice back in our country we are going to have to fight for it in Lawful Rebellion. NOTE the:- Bill of Rights 1689 - Bills of Exchange Act 1882 - Treason Act 1351 - Charter of Liberties 1100 - Magna Carta 1215/1297 - Declaration of Rights 1688/9 - These, all still in force today are in actual fact there to protect you and to uphold the principles of 'common law', use them or lose them! Condemnation with out investigation is the height of ignorance Albert Einstein. We have trusted public officials, judiciary, media and corporations, allowing them to manipulate every aspect of our society with complete unaccountability. Lay people turn to greedy bar member attorneys when they are afraid, only to be compromised into losing everything they have in the corrupted courtroom process. Usually their own attorneys and the rest of the courtroom players are all working against them for their own profit. The People do not realize this until they have been impoverished and destroyed. Get Sui Juris!!!& take charge of "your own jurisdiction". We must restore accountability and a standard of Law and Constitutional contract/oath with real penalties of prosecution for violations of the Public Trust by our government. Read the book

May 23 2012 Signed By MP
New Parliamentary Ombudsman forms sent off for further investigation but this is not for the first time, we pleaded for intervention in August 2011 and then again in November 2011 Read here, but today's will have MP Gordon Marsdens approval signed along with it, backed by the OPG s letter of point blank refusal to investigate Read & Read.
Sent 29.05.2012

May 22 2012 Further Complaints
drafted and sent to the Solicitors Regulatory Authority and the Law Society & Legal Ombudsman.

May 21 2012
Read further email exchange with Dr Waite the courts SPECIAL VISITOR.

May 21 2012 POSITION STATEMENT of CONCLUSION
Recap & reflect on 11 years. Faxed today a formal reply to PANNONE s, the JUDGE's, and the courts, with reference to the so called court order! Both items faxed to 10 Downing St, Domonic Grieve (Attorney General & OJC Office of Judicial complaints & further, to the Lord Chancellor Kenneth Clarke.

May 20 2012 Hi Mike
Yep, I would be interested. The problem is would Channel 4 really have the bottle to go up against this organised crime network operating actually within the legal profession with some of their own sitting at high levels of the judiciary facilitating property fraud, extortion and racketeering. These people with their steady stream of victims as we all approach old age make the Mafia look like small-fry amateurs in organised crime. Regards G

May 19 2012 Dear Mike
1 yes you can publish my letter if you tell me in which publication etc and 2 as I live in Austria participating in Channel 4 TV might be difficult depending upon times, dates etc.
However I am interested to see justice done against CoP and it's non- armed wing OPG who I also blame in this fiasco together with so-called "Court Special Visitor"
regards S

May 19 2012 Reply to S
Dear S
Thank you so much for writing to tell us about your plight and we are speaking to producers in Channel 4 television whom are interested in making a TV program would you be interested in participating!
Do you mind me also publishing your letter.
regards Mike & Ann

May 19 2012 Dear Mike & Ann Clarke
I found some of your correspondence written to a Dr Waite on the internet concerning capacity issues of your mother. I am writing (hope you don't mind) as it would seem I have been through the same agonies as you concerning my own 85 yrs old mum and the" court of protection" and so called "Court Special visitor" who was so old and incompetent and on research - I even found out he misrepresented places where he was supposed to have worked and now does not even have a GMC licence. On this incompetence he wrote a negative report to CoP resulting in me loosing (it was revoked) my EPA which my mum signed and granted to me in 2006. I was made the proverbial scape goat, and medical records were disclosed without consent. Presiding judge stated, I was unreasonable, secretive, and controlling when like you I was only trying to protect mum from judicial dictatorship and a take over of mum's finances by an "in-law" who was main instigator in the objection campaign in breach of mca Schedule 4. Said "in-law" has now been appointed deputy against mum's past and present wishes. My mum now lives a life of lonliness and misery as the so called "deputy" has no interest in my mum personally nor in her well being or welfare. I hope you come right in your campaign and get want you want for your mum. I agree with you the system is DIABOLICAL and extremely unfair - Human Rights notwithstanding. regards S

May 19 2012 Reply to G & Thank you G.
Channel 4 are interested in doing a TV program R U interested?
Mike

May 19 2012 Hello Mike
Good to see your site is back on-line. I had wanted to read again Alen Eccles letter to you. Considering such an irretrievable breakdown of Hugh Jones relationship with you and Anne, the question needs to be asked why he will do nothing as Public Guardian to make amends by having Jones removed.
The answer seems to be in his reference to his inability to go against the judicial decisions of the nominated Court of Protection Thugs. Its interesting to again see how the Court of Protection agents assert themselves by loutish bully-boy harassment against their victims. They are contemptuously using the mainstream court system for their corrupt own ends to get you silenced.
In the Sharp judgement they have obtained a criminal order for extortion against you, within their so called costs, much of which would go into their owns pockets.
Your right when you say it does not look good though. Especially once you realise it appears to be up against a highly organised national crime network determined to silence any dissenters from their claimed un-fettered power of their own discretion operating under the seal of the last of the corrupt high offices the crown.
Keep in touch..G

May 16 2012
Read the latest email exchanges with the Court of Proection Special Visitor Doctor!

May 15 2012 Host Suspension Problem
This site was taken down for a number of days without warning & without proper clarified information as to why and is still under investigation. We apologise to those people inconvenienced.

May 15 2012 Danny Linguard
I have just been speaking to a producer from c4 who is very interested in our story about the court of protection. She has said that she would like to speak to everybody affected by the court of protection. (only if you have not already spoken to the media) If your interested her number is 07795620236 and her name is Bronagh Walsh.

May 15 2012
Read a formal reply to PANNONE s, the JUDGE's, and the courts, with reference to the so called court order!

May 14 2012
Read a notice sent to our hosting provider Network Solutions.

May 14 2012
Read a potential claim against Network Solutions for the unwarranted suspension of hosting services without full and proper notice or explanation of why?

May 14 2012
Read a letter today sent to our hosting provider Network Solutions whom suddenly decided to withdraw service because of what they described as an AUP Acceptable use policy violation. Understandably because I have no idea to what they are referring this letter was sent. We are possibly of the belief that outside forces or intervention is at work here.

May 14 2012
Read a letter from MP Gordon Marsden confirming further intervention.

May 14 2012
Read the reply to OPG investigations refusal to investigate!

May 14 2012
Read a reply of refusal to investigate from OPG investigations to say that the non response of a HUGH JONES deputy request for mother to use £600 for a report on the first doctors report Dr Khan where a miscarriage of Justice has obviously taken place. Now would you call this protection. Is it because it's them that's being investigated? Of course it is! So, what does that stink of? Corruption!

May 13 2012
Read a copy of the PANNONE letter of final unconsented to & therefore unlawful court order May 2 2012.

May 13 2012
Read a copy of the UNLAWFUL Judgement from May 2 2012.

May 13 2012
Fear is cured by defensive action based on knowledge.
When the Government fear the people there is Liberty.
When the people fear the Government there is Tyranny.
It is better to die on your feet as a free man,
then to live on your knees as a slave.

May 11 2012 Phonecall
from John Jones of MP Gordon Marsdens office at 15.20pm to confirm that Mr Marsden is writing an additional letter to CEOPG Alan Eccles and also that upon receipt of our completed Parliamentary Health Service OMBUDSMEN form Gordon Marsden MP will sign it and send it for further investigative powers to be implimented.

May 10 2012
Response back from OPG without having to wait 50 days.
Read May 2nd & our Reply 4th May
Read original request 16th March
Read the reply sent to SONYA HANSEN at 12 noon today! 10.05.2012

May 10 2012
REQUEST No3 sent out by fax to HMRC Specialist listings TONY STANDEN.

May 9 2012
Read complaints faxed in to the OFFICE for Judicial Complaints.

May 9 2012
Read the complaint sent to the Attorney General's Office.

May 9 2012 DEVOTED
Mother & son that even a government and its corrupt, judicial dictatership will not seperate come what may!! Take your corruption and shove it. Your getting what you want, my mother's house, now you leave us alone! She has capacity, you have proof! What more do you want? She has said no, no & more no! But PANNONE s judicial corrupt juggernaut just keeps on coming! Take the bungalow share it with the relatives and leave my mother to make her own choices!! Its easy!! My mother said tonight, faced with the options of going into care with her own daughter and younger sons preferences its a no contest decision and never has been she does not feel safe anymore being in the UK where her freedom of choice is being corruptly denied by the relatives and PANNONE s HUGH JONES & his judcial corrupt "juggernaut" that we cannot defend against under the new wave of STATUTE Tsunami's engulfing common people and their BILL of RIGHTS 1689 with the MAGNA CARTA ACT 1215 that clearly in their eyes seem to have no relevance!!

May 8 2012 Dinner for 6

A celebration of Lynda's birthday, a little swoiree of close connected friends and supporters of mum and her plight, Jonathon & David, get together for dinner to wish Lynda a happy 64th.

May 8 2012
Read an email sent to MP GORDON MARSDEN.

May 5 2012
Response letter from new chief of OPG Alan Eccles denying any responsibility to the issue's in response to our letter of 24th April 2012 here to Read. This is obviously the start of the new brush that don't sweep clean at all. He is going to continue as before in the exact same manner as Martin John, deny what's happening, sweep it under the carpet and let's hope it will go away! Well we got news for you ALAN - it won't!!

May 4 2012 YET ANOTHER CONCERNED WEB WATCHER
Hello Mike
Just been reading your latest on your site.. Right to trial be our peers
Detailed Accounts
The other day I read that funds held in court,, paid interest at 6% between the years 2001 to 2009 so even after your Mum purchased the house there should have been a substantial income coming in each year.. Where is it accounted for?
Have you noticed in the recordings the way in which Jones hides behind the court? I suggest you ask your Mum write [recorded delivery] directly to the Superior clerk, now a so called Senior Judge,, Master Denzil Lush and demand that he account, with detailed annual accounts as to income and expenditure to account for all the years and show where all your Mums money has gone.
Point out to him his ultimate public liability for his agent who his authority appointed as your Mums receiver. His authority has the ultimate liability as a public authority for its contractors.. [ for example if you were to fall into a hole in pavement,, you don't look to sue the contractor,, you sue the council which is liable for the pavements upkeep.]
Further to his ultimate liability of public authority as the appointing authority perhaps you would like to point out to Lush his fiduciary position and quote to Lush:-
Lord Penzance "The burden of proof lies on the person of fiduciary position to show he is not taking advantage to cover deception against the estate."
You need to back up you Mums demand for them to "account" with your own letter and some how persuade your brother and sister to do the same also, Why not?? Would they not want to also see total clarity of Jones accounting for their own Mums money,, so sad they not even send her at least a card on Mothers Day,, shocking behaviour towards their own mother!! Considering, according to Jones your Mums money was getting so low was it just a psychological game to turn bro & sis against you when near the end of the money he substantialy increases the money to both you and your Mum? Could this be seen from a receivers position to make any practicle sense?
Special Visitors
Can't recall if you ever commented on the corrupt Lord Chancellors Visitors Report of ????????? which I attached to an earlier email.. I know one example of a corrupt Lord Chancellors report does not make all the visitors corrupt but after seeing that report I would never rely-on any one report which according to that courts own corrupt rules, also these reports are secret without an order of the court for disclosure. If you do wish to use as an example of this courts corrupt rules allowing it to rely on its own agents report I will place out there in the public domain.
Considering that you are up against a corruption which exists within the legal profession and reaching into the very judiciary, establishment authority you need a jury for any hearing..

May 4 2012 CONCERNED WEB WATCHER
Hi Michael. You are being denied due process, which is treason under the Magna Carta. I had a coaching session from Winston Shrout who informed me of this in a situation where I was also being denied due process. He suggested I put together the following letter to the attorney general (Dominic Grieve): I wish to claim my rights under the clause 39, Magna Carta 1215. I understand that under the Magna Carta due process is guaranteed and should this right be denied to me, this is treason. I am therefore sending you the attached Affidavit of Truth, as of necessity, from which you may draw a conclusion that there is an allegation that such a felony has been committed. How soon can I expect you to prosecute? As a courtesy, copy the judge and other party in on the correspondence. As you see, it does entail you putting together an affidavit of truth, to accompany the letter. I hope this may help.

May 4 2012
Read a letter from the CoP investigations team in response to a request in regard to the qualifications of Dr Khan specifically in 2001. Please note how the letter does not answer in full and therefore you need to write back again and presumeably wait another 2 months or 50 days to get a response when the rules say they expect to reply within 10 days!! Now, I have said in previous correspondence how the court of protection suffer from double speak in other words they do not answer questions fully or thoroughly so now we will write back, I wonder should I expect a response in 10 days or 50!! Read the original request and clearly see how the response does not fit the request!!
Read our reply that incidently took 1 hour!

May 4 2012 JUDGEMENT DAY
Coming soon!

May 4 2012
Read 2nd letter sent to Specialist listings at Manchester courts TONY STANDEN.

May 4 2012 RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY "JURY".
Read article 6 section 2 listed upon the Civil Liberties Protection and Human Rights. Section 2. There must be a hearing before an independent and impartial court or tribunal established by law (including unbiased jurors) . The right to a fair trial is fundamental to the rule of law and to democracy itself. The right applies to both criminal and civil cases.

May 3 2012 BILL OF RIGHTS 1689
Read the Bill of Rights 1689 and how a request for a trial to be judged by equal piers, a jury, in Law cannot be refused! Protect yourself with this knowledge, for as we will prove very soon, Judges and magistrates dare not go against the Bill of Rights 1689, for it is the very statute they must obey.

May 3 2012 MP RECORDED MEETING
Listen to the 45 minute meeting that took place on 13th April 2012 with our MP Gordon Marsden that I have phoned, left messages and sent emails in which Mr Marsden promised further intervention but has failed to respond. I am faced between the devil and the deep blue sea. I am slowly but surely being backed into a corner of injustice on the one hand and corruption on the other. I either have to face it or run away? If you listen to the meeting of 45 minutes in which confidentiality was promised but now my back is increasingly against the wall and so it has got to be released into the public domain to those whom have an interest of whats actually going on in the court of corruption without any form of redress thats investigated to satisfactory levels.

May 2 2012 Will Mum have to employ another solicitor again at £984!
Read the 4th request mother has sent to HUGH JONES for her accounts 2011-2012 that have not been supplied and literally ignored causing neglect, ill treatment and in breach of Mental Capacity Act Rules.
Read his reply followed up by ours!! Plus further email here Read

May 1 2012
Read an email from Judge Peter Jackson.

May 1st 2012
Read PANNONE costs! £43,000 total.

May 1 2012 ADDENDUM
Read an Addendum to hearing papers, faxed at 9.30am this morning.

April 30 2012 Judge Sir David Foskett
is the so-called Judge presiding over what will be an unconstitutional, unlawful, unconsented to, star chamber administrative hearing, this Wednesday 2nd May 2012. This is the Judge that refused my request for a common law court with Jury stating the law does not provide for a jury in this situation and so the hearing will be dealt with by a Judge alone. Read the letter from the Judge Sir David Foskett that is depriving me of due process and is more than likely about to commit perjury on Wednesday by presiding over the unlawful hearing that is part of the Judicial Dictatorship now operating openly within the UK. Tomorrow I am going to fax to this Mr Foskett an "Addendum" to my previous faxed 15 pages. This person is only a flesh and blood man just like me when he serves himself up in this unconsented to hearing, because as consent has been refused his status simply does not exist as a Judge. He will in effect be placing himself under a situation of liability as an "administrator" & NOT a Judge, unprotected from the unwarranted priveliged position he holds. In his vest and underpants he is the same as me, but maybe not as pretty! What Mr Foskett is failing to understand is that a court is there for a place of remedy and remedy by the current bias to hand is not forthcoming. When a legal entity such as PANNONE s are in the frame how is it fair for another judicial entity such as Judge going to Judge in a fair and impartial manner. Simple.com he is not! And so impartiality and only a Jury will suffice, Thank you!

April 30 2012
Read how the Judge Peter Jackson has suddenly now decided to get involved but to ignore the previous correspondence sent to him.

April 30 2012
Read a prepared 15 pages of Statutory Declaration of Notice of Understanding & Intent sent by email or letters and or faxed to, Manchester Civil Justice Centre, Kenneth Clarke MP & Lord Chancellor of Justice department, David Cameron & Nick Clegg's office and BBC or other associated persons.

April 30 2012
Read a reminder of an open letter issued on the PANNONE and the court 1st Feb 2012 with regard to an unlawful hearing that was proceded without my consent in a letter handed to the court here to Read from the 26th Jan 2012 and the Judge Victoria Sharp's order here to Read. Now PANNONE s are proceeding again without my consent to a star chamber hearing this coming Wednesday for a permanent injunction in an hearing again sent a statement of refusal of consent but consent to a common law jury court would be acceptable. On the 10th Feb 2012 an open reply letter was sent to the Judge Justice Sharp that has been re-faxed to the court today as to remind the sitting judge, here to read Read.

April 29 2012
Read a letter to Cameron and Clegg written 2 years ago, re faxed to day!! Faxed +442079250918

April 29 2012
Read a sample of what was happening to us 11 long years ago and take note whilst reading this that unbeknown to my mother he was charging her £507 weekly amounting to annual fees of £26,377 you will be shocked. The suffering is no different today it goes on & on and on. There are alot more letters to be published about the corrospendence with Hugh Jones.

April 29 2012
Read an email addressed to our MP.

April 28 2012 Mind & Matter
Link Of course we’re looking at an uphill struggle, and it won’t come about overnight, some will say it’s even impossible, as what’s already happening is a drip-drip effect of our rights being eroded and were losing more and more of our liberty and freedom every day, that’s why it’s equally important that there are those who are prepared to counteract this negative effect. It’s happened before and throughout mans history, and there is no real reason it cannot occur again, though more importantly is how can it be achieved, – and how it can is by making sure we breakdown the divide and rule barriers, come together as a collective and drive-out our present slave masters and corrupt political leaders.
The time has come for us to rise and stand up against our true enemies, not us against each other, but us verses ‘them’, you should be ready to protest and fight for your voices to be heard. – If this is not really you, then let your job be done by the fountain pen, biro or pencil, which are all mightier than the sword, use your keyboard and the internet, text messages and phone calls to help lift-up and uncover every rock and stone, make no hiding place possible for these demonic worshipers of death, mayhem and hate. For one good thing on our side, is that these parasitical scum leaders have to live their lives in full view of us, watch em, expose their every sleazy scam, watch how their spending our money 24/7-365 days of the year, make it known to them, that we know their attempted schemes, plots and plans. Let them know we know their only in their positions of power, to look after themselves, and that when their caught stealing, lying and cheating, we must demand their resignations, or sack them and send them to jail.

April 28 2012
Read an email request sent to Judge Jackson for a signed copy of his order.

April 28 2012
Read a written, signed, faxed request, sent to the courts for signed copies of the 3 recent directions orders made by 3 Judges where we believe miscarriages of Justice are taking place and therefore, what risk assessment strategies are in place for redress if any, in these matters. When we're all health and safety enforced should the Justice system too have the same and so what are the risk assessments in place to protect against a miscarriage of Justice?

April 27 2012
Read about the serious campaign for Truth and Justice thats on a very united front. A fully independent; non state funded; influenced or controlled community organization group set up in the UK, for the benefit of ordinary local people deliberately frustrated and corruptly denied justice or due redress in UK Courts. Date: This Monday 23rd April 2012 Time: 10:am for 10 days. Venue: outside the Royal Courts of inJustice. Fighting Judicial Corruption & Unlawful Imprisonments!!

April 27 2012
Read another follow up email to Judge Peter Jackson informing him of Pannone s hearing with harassment charges in clear breach of Mental Capacity Act section 5.

April 27 2012
Read a letter being faxed to the court in Manchester in connection with our refusal of consent to the hearing intended of Hugh Jones of Pannone s so called harrasment claim for a permanent injuction.

April 27 2012
Read an email to Judge Peter Jackson's new clerk whom we have only just discovered his old one apparently retired without informing us in the middle of case and where email corrospondence to the old clerk was boucing back undelivered!

April 26 2012
Read the letter from the courts in which a request for a jury court has been denied for PANNONE s harassment charges and where it is an obvious denial of due process. When a person is treated unfairly by the government, including the courts, he is said to have been deprived of or denied due process.

April 25 2012 Brynn, Mum, James, Cheryl, Me and John, BBQ

Stunning night picture at 9pm having BBQ at Cheryls Villa. Spend life with who makes you happy, not who you have to impress. Facebook entry: Michael Clarke :- To those relatives trying to deny mum her human rights to freedom and civil liberty, where do you think she would rather be? With me or in a care home likely to be abused! Sheer stupidity your suffering from, don't you dare try and enforce upon my mother your own low life morals! (Their recent statement to court being placed right here soon)

April 25 2012
Read email exchange with PANNONE s.

April 24 2012
Read a letter sent in response to the letter that the Chief Executive of the OPG Alan Eccles sent to our MP. Our disgust is clearly visible and our anger grows more substantial. Read also a letter to our MP.

April 24 2012
Read a letter sent from the OPG to MP just received.
With MPs email to Read & our Reply to our MP.

April 24 2012
Read email request for travel expenses to attend resolution meeting planned for Friday next.

April 24 2012
Read email to MP Gordon Marsden requesting an update.

April 24 2012
Read an email sent to MP Kenneth Clarke Member of Parliament for Rushcliffe "Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice" whom we have written to once before without getting any reply! Read it, dated 2nd June 2011. Read about Kenneth Clarke. Fax +441223335062

April 23 2012
Read about what you did not know about the Taxes & The Crown.
It is apparent to any wakeful observer that the courts have accelerated their gradual move away from protecting people under common law against corporations. Now the British Government has become transparent in demonstrating that it is no more than an arm of a corrupt murderous corporation utilising international and domestic terrorism to increase the profits for its senior shareholders. We now see the courts are openly claiming that Statute law is superior to the constitution and common law, in what is a treasonous move to make the mass of mankind no more than chattels to psychopathic few. Under common law it is a criminal offense for the Master of the Court of Protection to interfere with other courts. This would severely hamper Denzel Slush from protecting the cabal of fraudulent Probate Lawyers that infest this parasitic administrative legal fiction.

April 23 2012
Read a reply from an email complaint of institutionalised corruption within the Office of the Public Guardian sent to the AUDIT COMMISION.

April 23 2012
Read more revelations coming to light about PANNONE s HUGH JONES.

April 22 2012 Waiting time..
Sitting it out in the Spanish sunshine whilst the powers that be decide on the next course of action is complete form of relaxation for me mum and James, pictured here with 37 year friend Brynn and Cheryl of 20 years. The CoP can mess us around and mess us around all they want but the problem just ain't going to go away. Tomorrow is the tenth day I have been waiting for a reply from the new Chief Executive of the Court Mr Alan Eccles and though we wrote to him with renewed optimism it does appear to be waining fast. Not only has he not responded but we await long overdue replies from the complaints team of the court and also HUGH JONES yet again. Is another Commercial Lien needed to kick em up the jacksy and or the enforcement of the outstanding one! The Judge Justice Peter Jackson is due on the 23rd of April tomorrow to decide on mothers application to be released but because of HUGH JONES assistant DAVID HILTONS refusal to cooperate with independant Psychologist found in Liverpool not a thing has been done!! I wonder why??
So..
No response from HUGH JONES for the request of £600 for a report on the report from 2001 to investigate a miscarriage of justice 11 years ago!
No response from the CoP complaints team regarding no response from Hugh Jones & his refusal to cooperate in a court order!! & our request for information under the freedom of information laws on the qualifications of the so called "special visitor" Dr Khan?
No response from the Judge Justice Peter Jackson about HUGH JONES obstructing the court order to agree bilaterally to an independant psychologist..
No response from Judge Foskitt to ask for a common law court for PANNONE s false charges of harassment failing to recognise Capcacity Act Section 5 that protects carers from any legal liabilities.
No response from MP Gordon Marsden, where we await his promised further intervention.
No response from the new man at the helm, Alan Eccles!!!
In the mean time my mothers application to be released is now 6 months old and dated back to November last year! She is now approaching her 72nd birthday and has been in the Court of Protection JAIL of hell for near on 12 years at costs to her of probably in excess of £300,000 that in reality she never lost capacity and so this money stolen from her!

April 20 2012
Read another long suffering client of PANNONE s HUGH JONES and the Court of Protection/Office of the Public Guardian whom would rather give it all to charity to get their lives back! We can't all be wrong HUGH JONES,

April 20 - 2012 We believe you can stop corruption...
Why else would we go on. Civil injustice will lead to civil unrest let's hope we can find the peaceful means to stop corruption. There should be in this day and age a clear and concise right of recourse that's truely transparent, not dependant on money, and effective for those whom are supposedly protected. How dare they use the words Court of Protection without effecting a risk assessment policy of ensuring rights of recourse are there and are clear, without such a path available they can only expect allegations of corruption. The SRA is not effective and even the MP admits after complaining to the Cheif exec. it does pose the question of where else does one go and if your MP can tell you this then what other words can be used to describe whats happening under the guise of protection when in reality the words CoN, Court of Neglection are the reality as the definition of neglect is the failure to do what a reasonable person would do. Common Law is the means to fix this and the Commercial Lien we used, unfortunately, money is the root and the evil that's preventing it's use. Not I might add lawfully, but unlawfully. We don't need a money orientated statute administrative system thats corrupted by cash when the common laws of the land, if used will fix the problem! What is the Judiciary & the Executive afraid of?
Truth & Redundancy!
Read about a study of widespead government corruption In philosophical, theological, or moral discussions, corruption is the moral impurity or deviation from an ideal.

APRIL 19 2012 A birthday celebration ...
for Cheryl, our best friend on her 49th taken today at a celebratory lunch outing to the MIRALMONTE Restaurante in Coin Spain. A sense of normality has to continue for mum and us in the fog of corruption we are having to suffer and being in Spain provides that exile away from that suffering allowing us feel for a short period a sense of normality!! We only wish this could be the norm.

April 18 2012 Life goes on..
Taken late last night in a bar near Marbella where friend Terri Fox was performing his drag comedian act, Me Mum and James having a beer till after midnight soaking up some spanish life once more in a Brit Bar!

April 16 2012
Read a brief insight to the clear and concise breaches of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 that HUGH JONES & PANNONES & The CoP & not least of all, Judges, that continue to breach this "act" with impunity. In this short highlighted document take note of the very last line highlighted which refers to CRIMINAL NEGLECT of a patient in which I believe HUGH JONES the CoP and PANNONEs & Judges are all guilty of by vicariously neglecting a patients rights & her carer, under their control causing an effect of gross ill treatment which should rank as potentially imprisonable for periods of up to 5 years as shown here! This is the level we are now at where we deem those responsible to answer these charges that we seriously wish to bring upon them all. Link

April 14 2012 09.36am
Link reminder of my mother Ann Clarke's Position Statement to read, that was presented on the 12th of March 2012 to the Judge Mr Justice Peter Jackson that we sorely do not want forgot and so re-linked here to be re read if needs be.

April 13 2012 18.30pm
Link to an email request sent to new Chief Executive of the Office of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN - ALAN ECCLES. We live in hope, with renewed optimism, that Mr Alan Eccles will do the office of the public guardian a justice that is so needed in a sea of injustice's that its accused of from a wide variety of people up and down the UK and abroad.

April 13 2012 16.30 to 17.30
A one hour meeting with our MP Listen here to Gordon Marsden whom has I hope gathered some clarity to our severe problems being encountered with Court of Protection and its deputy Hugh Jones. The tone of the meeting was quite intense but only to be expected. An undertaking of confidentiality was asked for and has been respected until after several calls and emails made that resulted in nothing, no reply's etc and so the deal is off. Correspondence expected to pass between our MP and the newly appointed Chief Executive of the Court of Protection Alan Eccles and thus we await to see if the new brush will sweep clear the skeletons remaining to bring about even more clarity and transparency so desperately needed within the CoP and to rid itself of its reputation as a "CoN".

April 13 2012 15.00pm CoP Court Chief Change
Link to Ex Chief Exec. MARTIN JOHN does a runner and Kenneth Clarke appoints Alan Eccles as Chief Executive!

April 13 2012 11.17am
Link to further formal complaints being made without response from the court of protection and Hugh Jones.

April 13 2012 08.55am
Link to a brief encounter outside the office's of MP Gordon Marsden with the elusive man himself.

April 12 2012
Link to the good one's. Samuel Smith & Chris Cuddihee. Article of interest.

April 12 2012 SECRECY! 07.12am
No email forthcoming of Psychology direct, Gemma Williams, that's what's the scariest thing about this whole saga is the closed shop routine of untransparency, how these so called professionals make such statements as, "I'm sorry but we don't deal with 'third party clients' we only deal direct with solicitors!".
The SRA whom one can complain to SOLICITORS REGULATORY AUTHORITY will not tell you any progress or updates to an investigation or even whether its complete. The court of protection can complete an investigation of 7 long months and their result is a 3 line reply and the full report will not be disclosed, why? Because, "its secret".
The whole system seems to be a closed shop, with the exception of one or two whom seem to have their integrity intact and will deal with individuals. What or whom are they protecting? What is so secretive about the recruitment of a psychologist? Whom would want it to be so secret and more importantly, why? If there is a psychologist working in Liverpool whom has the relevant backround and experience why is the information being held back Gemma? If your organisation's name say's PSYCHOLOGY 'DIRECT' then why is it not so, "DIRECT"?
Email to Gemma Williams

April 11 2012 16.45 Jane Ireland Report on SPECIAL VISITORS!
Link to the full report by Jane Ireland about so called "SPECIAL VISITOR" reports and the misgivings that have surfaced.

April 11 2012 16.30 Link to listen to phonecall
Link to an email sent to Gemma Williams of PSYCHOLOGY DIRECT who has become upset about being recorded in conversations where we hereby provide our best explanation.

April 11 2012 3pm Telephone call
Link & letters posted to Manchester High Court Tony Standen to request a common law court with Jury for Pannone's harassment charges to go before Judge Justice Foskitt next week the 18th April 2012 for the consideration of this request.

April 11 2012
Link to 2 letters arrived this morning from MP Gordon Marsden, one addressed to me and mother and the other is a copy of a letter sent to Chief Executive of The Public Guardian Martin John. REPLY LETTER by post and email

April 11 2012
Link to todays 2nd formal complaint sent to Court of Protection, Hugh Jones and MP Gordon Marsden.

April 10 2012 Facebook Comment Today
The gradual perversion of the Laws by the professionals operating in secrecy behind the closed doors of this establishment authority masquerading its self as a court of Law are in stealth setting themselves up as a Stazi class of their own with the mentality of gangsters to line their own pockets at the expense of the vulnerable and the elderly by way of professional racketeering and property fraud.

April 10 2012 CORRUPTION
Link to an email request sent today to all listed panel deputies of the PUBLIC GUARDIAN office whom are not all believed to "piss in the same pot" and we hope that in a thick fog of corruption some shining lights might appear!

April 2012 Taken 4 weeks previous
Recent pic of mum relaxing 4 weeks ago outside Cheryls villa in Spain. Where would you want to be! Being parceled up into a care home to suit the relatives that are seeking an early inheritance & or the judiciary's satisfied overrated fee thefts, or being free thinking to live where and with whom you choose! I think its a no brainer don't you? Being free is a basic HUMAN RIGHT! My mother has had her freedom stolen from her. Her Human rights to choices stolen from her! Her money stolen from her! Her money mal administered! Not satisfied with what they've already had! Now they want her house, I hope the purpetrators of these crimes in process have the same situations come to bear on them in their old age let's see the tables turn as they surely will. I hope I'm around to watch it.

April 7 01.47am 2012
Link to voicemail message from Sam Cullen, assistant to Gordon Marsden MP. Finally some sort of message conveyed that the matter is being looked into, we were beginning to lose faith in our MP. We await his letter in the hope he can convey some sort of clarity in a sea of injustice that's being spoon fed to us week on week.

April 6 2012 Easter Weekend
We enter our weekend being non the wiser, being given the runaround by the Courts and their cronies PANNONEs, not too mention our very own MP Gordon Marsden whose constituency office staff all seem to be in cahoots together, where nothing is being done what so ever. What a sad system we have all contributed too to cause such misery to the most vulnerable people of society. Patience wearing thin we will give matters a little more time but I am not prepared to put my mother through much more of the shit we are having to endure. She and I want to get on with the rest of whats left of lives in some sort of peace. God help all those in similar pain whom do not have the same determinations. My mother requested release from the court on capacity grounds in November last year, 6 months ago and still she is being treated like an animal without any respect for her wishes. Despicable!

It does not seem to matter which political party one writes to!

05/04/2012
There are growing concerns that under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 the Court of Protection has been handed sweeping powers without adequate scrutiny and openess. This departs from the general principle of open justice held by other courts. Holding its cases behind closed doors, the Court has the power to order that people with severe learning difficulties are sterilised, undergo abortions or have life-support switched off. It can even impose “experimental” treatments on these patients without their consent. The Act also gives the Court power to order procedures “where that procedure or treatment must be carried out using a degree of force to restrain the person concerned”. Previously High Court judges were asked to rule whether people with severe learning difficulties in the care of health authorities and councils should undergo treatments if they believed it was in their best interests. However, these cases were held in public and could be reported by the media. According to sources Sir Nicholas Wall, the President of the Family Division sitting in the Court of Protection, ruled some time ago that a woman with cancer of the uterus must receive treatment even though she has a phobia of hospitals and needles. He stated that this was because she has a learning difficulty and so was judged to be incapable of deciding on her own “best interests”. He then allegedly ruled that doctors should be allowed to sedate the 55 year-old in her own home, using a drug hidden in a glass of squash, and then detain her in a ward following the essential treatment. The case was only the second in the Court to be made public. And yes, this is in England and the year is 2012!

05/04/2012 11.55am Email to Judge and Court of Protection
Link to email to JUDGE Peter Jackson, Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Gemma Williams of Psychology Direct. Ask yourself after listening to the 2 phonecalls who would you say is obstructing JUSTICE?

05/04/2012 11.30am 2nd Phone call to Gemma
Link to a second phonecall to Gemma of Psychology Direct whom has put time and effort in independantly to find a specialist that is being obstructed by HUGH JONES the deputy's assistant DAVID HILTON! The court actually ordered an equally agreeable independant expert in which has been sought where nothing else is on offer where David Hilton quite clearly is making it difficult for us to cooperate with the court! Make your own assumptions!

05/04/2012 11am Corruption rears it head again!
Link to this mornings telephone call from Gemma at Psychology Direct whom was searching for a specialist Nuerocognotive Clinical Psycologist who has experience in Expressive Dysphasia to assess mum again as an independant & to liase with Dr Donna Schelewa and her previous 2 reports confirming mums capacity. Gemma has been stopped in her tracks because the court demands one of its own "Special Visitors", one assumes these must be the one's that channel 4 TV did a report about involving corruption! Not on your Nellie, Mr Justice Peter Jackson!

05/04/2012 Snooper Law
Theresa May wants to be able to read our e-mails, so, everybody is forwarding her their spam. Her e-mail address is: theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
Don't say I told you. ;-)
They are trying to stop you smoking
They are trying to stop you drinking
They don't want you socialising
Next is your internet

04/04/2012 Petition to stop big brother
Link TO THE PETITION to stop The government whom wants to give itself new powers to spy on our internet and email use in real time -- but a massive national outcry can save the internet and stop the big brother law.Public outrage is growing and news reports suggest that Cameron and Clegg are being forced to slow down their march to secure draconian powers to spy on what we do online. If we pile on the pressure now, we can persuade them to back off the big brother bill for good.The last time this was mooted in Parliament it failed precisely because of strong public opposition. Our call to Cameron, Clegg and Home Secretary Theresa May can protect our privacy and save the internet. Sign the petition to beat back big brother and forward widely:

04/04/2012 Phonecall to Manchester Court
Telephone conversation today with Manchester court resulted in letters being dispatched to clarify the request for a common law court with jury request in PANNONEs so-called harassment claim.

04/04/2012 Miscarriage of Justice
Link to an email to HUGH JONES for mother requesting funds to Investigate a miscarriage of justice report to be conducted by Dr Donna Schelewa on the bogus SPECIAL VISITOR from the Court of Protection "Jail" sent 2001 to assess my mother.

04/04/2012
Link to reply from Dr Donna Schelewa whom is prepared to conduct a report on the original Dr Khan's report of 2001 in which was the cornerstone foundation for keeping mum in the Court of Protection "Jail" that has cost her in excess of £250,000.

03/04/2012
Blast from the past, Mum's birthday August 9th 2008 at a gay wedding in Malaga, me n mum at David and Terri Fox's celebration.

03/04/2012
Link to further update regarding search for an expert.

03/04/2012
Link to search for a specialised expert.

03/04/2012
Link to email reply to PANNONE with reference to their proposed harassment claim court date.

03/04/2012
Link to email to HUGH JONES requesting detailed accounts submitted for 2011-2012.

03/04/2012
Note to an in person call at MP Gordon Marsdens constituency office for an update.

03/04/2012
Link to email to Dr Donna Schelewa regarding completing an assessment of a 2001 report by Dr Khan in his 50 minutes verbally recorded and his written report with regard to potential claims of negligence.

03/04/2012
When the perpetrator of abuse, just so happens to be "The Office of the Public Guardian", who do you complain to?

03/04/2012
Link to Age UK 2012 guide to deprovation of liberty safeguards & Human Rights Act 1998(section 10/5 compensation)

03/04/2012
Link to deprovation of liberty safeguards.

02/04/2012
Link to an email of formal complaint to the court of protection regarding a lack of formal reply after a period of 16 days has passed requesting information under the freedom of information act.

01/04/2012
Link to an email sent to court Specialist listings TONY STANDEN refusing consent to a proposed hearing of Harassment claim by PANNONE unless conducted by a common law court with Jury.

29/3/2012
Link to a reply from Pannone LLP accepting a private meeting to try for a resolution.

29/3/2012
Link to an email to PANNONE LLP resolution team.

28/3/2012
Link to an American article on testamentary capacity and undue influence. Link pdf format.

28/3/2012
Link to an email from the Judge Peter Jackson and our follow up response.

27/3/2012
Link email & Phonecall this morning from Dr Donna Schelewa explaining she has been on holiday and that to recruit another expert witness with regard to mums new capacity assessment that care must be provided that Mrs Clarke has a condition of Expressive Dysphasia meaning she knows what she wants to say but struggles to get it out. Based on this condition it is vitally important that the expert witness sought to conduct an assessment has experience to cover this condition otherwise the result can come out completely different. •People with expressive dysphasia are not fluent and have difficulty forming words and sentences. There are grammatical errors and difficulty finding the right word. In severe cases they do not speak spontaneously but they usually understand what is said to them.

26/3/2012
Link to email to JUDGES clerk for the judge to submit the enclosed questions to put to the SPECIAL VISITOR.

26/3/2012
Link email that no response has been received from the original sent 10 days ago requesting to know what the qualifications were of the SPECIAL VISITOR Dr Khan back in 2001.

26/3/2012
Link to information request from Jane Ireland.

26/3/2012
Link to email sent to HUGH JONES requesting the judge's email address of his clerk as was promised in the administrative hearing but not received.

25/3/2012
Link to an email of further possibility recommended by Jane Ireland.reply stating too busy and a request for a possible collegue's availability!

25/3/2012
Link to an email sent to a Caroline Mulligan whom is a recommended by Jane Ireland forensic expert in the matters to hand requesting an urgent appointment to assess mother and compare notes to previous assessments.

23/3/2012
Link to email sent with urgency to MP's John Hemming & Gordon Marsden, Hugh Jones & Jane Ireland who is conducting an investigation into special visitors reports.

23/3/2012
Link to Judge Peter Jackson's order from court arrived today. In relation to mums applicaion to be released from the court of protection.

22/3/2012
Further discussions today with a correspondent are hopefully going to result in a certain radio station interview to be forthcoming. The website has been sold/transferred to a foreign company for investment to redesign and enlarge upon its potential. With agreements on its primary purpose and function which its primary aim is to bring about justice for those whom need protection from The Court of Protection and its Predatory Guardians.

22/3/2012
Link to further investigations now being conducted by MP John Hemming whom is linking up with our own MP Gordon Marsden.

21/3/2012
Link to the controversial Commercial Lien/CLAIM that has been sent to MP John Hemming & MP Gordon Marsden for their perusal about our claim that we were forced into, by having no other route of recourse to proceed down that did not involve the use of money, that my mother was being denied the right to by the deputy HUGH JONES of PANNONE LLP. An Englishmans home is his castle and we all have the right to defend this however we so choose. The above course of action was what we believe our only option in the face of a government juggernaut that was heading our direction riding roughshod over anything and anybody that stood in its path. COMMON LAW is slowly being eradicated by STATUTES in which CONSENT is needed but now denied and we urge people to stand up for whats right and to correct whats going wrong in our current corrupt future, thats being laid out before us, unless we put it all to a STOP!

19/3/2012
Visit today to our local MPs offices and spoke with John Jones whom said yes he was familiar with the case and all the paperwork on it is down in London with Sam Cullen Mr Marsdens assistant whom John said he would ring to confirm for Mr Marsden to liase with MP John Hemming.

19/3/2012
A brother and sister who claim to love their mother, made no contact with her on mother's day in spite of mother's mobile being charged and waiting beside her for calls. Today we waited for the postman to deliver belated cards but no cards came! How can they claim that they care about their own mother?

18/3/2012
Link to John Hemming MP who at last is to raise our case with others in the House of Commons on Wednesday next we hope and pray that this matter is drawing to a close after 11 years of sheer mental torture!

18/3/2012

Link to yesterday's front page news in the Daily Mail about hired gun, fake doctors reports, to suit the paymasters.

17/3/2012
Mum pictured this afternoon with close friend celebrity Alice Barry (Lilliam from "Shameless") at our close friends farmhouse in Todmoden where we had tea today and chatted with connections to a Daily Mail correspondent whom was providing advice on what are the best avenues to proceed down for publicity to be extended. Within this meeting we talked with company executive whom are offering their media services to redesign the websign for maximum attraction complimented with blogging facility possible forum.

16/3/2012
Link to email exchange with HUGH JONES

16/3/2012
Link to a serious enquiry with the court of protection.

16/3/2012
Link channel four news 13/3/2012 scandal of SPECIAL VISITORS

16/3/2012
Link to the courts "SPECIAL VISITORS" Scandal of 'unqualified' experts who advise our family courts: Decisions about the care of thousands of children routinely flawed

16/3/2012
Link Family courts and how incompetent (but highly paid) so-called experts are failing families.

Thursday 18.14 15/03/2012
The Daily Mail whom, I tomorrow will have a contact, to arrange a meeting with to discuss taking on the exposure of our plight.

Thursday 15.00 15/3/2012
Link to Queens Bench High Court and a Judge's full job description.

Thursday 14.14 15/03/2012
Statute Law or Common Law which is THE superior and are we being denied our rights to due process!

Thursday 15/03/2012 09.42
Link letter to Manchester Family Courts.

Thursday 15/03/2012 08.36
Link to reporting miscarriages of Justice. A Manchester group that meets twice a month based from Oldham. These people are collating what they see information for action against injustices, "There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest"

Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10
Link email to courts and to HUGH JONES about our request to relist the case as we believe the process to have been corrupt.

Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10
Link letter of reply to Pannone about their harassment claim!

Wednesday 14/03/2012 13.10
Link letter from PANNONEs asking to engage in a statute court process of their claim I have harassed them!!!

Wednesday 14/03/2012 00.14
Link to judges guide to determine capacity USA style.
People have the right to make foolish or eccentric decisions and to govern their own affairs, unless they lack decision-making capacity and cannot understand the consequences of their decisions.

Wednesday 14/03/2012 00.08
Link to a telephone recording in June 2001 to Clinical expert Dr Hana Al Hamar and what she had to say about my mothers capacity and that it was intact and her rights to make decisions should not have been removed 11 years ago and whilst we still have up to date reports to confirm her capacity to make decisions she still is being illegally stopped from doing so. This report from 4 months ago -
Link 2011 report
Link 2010 report
Link 2001 report
Link 05.09.2001 Dr Khan recording of the sent court special visitor whom was only present less than an hour and did not do any clinical exam. Mum was asked to get her own reports that took 4 hours each and she had to pay for them usually £1000 each and when the court of protection special visitor came he rejected those reports in less than an hour!
Link 06.10.11 to listen to the secret courts own visitor meeting with mum in which the court refused to supply a copy of this report. I wonder why?
A blind man can see she has capacity so - Judge Peter Jackson I know you stated theres no money for this case and I know you stated you had not really got time but hey, my mother is "doing time" in your court of protection JAIL.. take some time Peter to do your job as a Judge and positively review all the facts.

Tuesday 13.03.2012 10:44
The most realistic thing I have learned came from The British Constittution Group whom told me that the most fantastic thing about true common law is its all basically COMMON SENSE and if whats happenning to you does not seem like common sense then you can be sure its in breach of your common laws. Now everytime I am encountering court enclosures in statute ways I am encountering Judges and QCs etc saying well this is a common law court, but its not. Any court without a jury is a statute one, one which does require your consent and to state to you that it does not is a lie. Another thought, if you have 4 reports of confirmed capacity does it make sense to obtain a 5th especially when they have not got time or money to process it. Where would you say is the common sense in that and so this demonstartes the difference of STATUTE law which don't make sense and is only because its twisted to suit the executives and the judiciary in order or in the favour of whats at the root of the EVIL, MONEY!
COMMON LAW makes common sense and common law cannot be twisted or manipulated in the same easy ways of statute rules by the executive and judiciary. What am I talking about? Its obvious really is'nt it - CORRUPTION.
Link to information about Judges Oaths. Yesterday the judge said he was acting on his oath of office. Back to top

Tuesday 13.03.2012 09:00
Last night's reflection on events has not gone down well and though today should be a day to feel a lighter note of happiness as its me & my partners 3rd Anniversary its tinged with some sadness of reflection of how things are for mum. It feels to me that this court of protection is not being run from the rigid rules of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 but is being manipulated by biased uncorroborated testimony from relatives and so matters are being extended to considering a persons vulneraility issue's without proof, where proof is not needed as the sole consideration should be as stated The Mental Capacity Act 2005 stage 1 and stage 2. My mother failed stage 1 and so it is agreed allround that she does have some impairment of the mind but stage 2 of the act where decisions can be made she passes and so under the rules is deemed as having capacity. Now one would ask the question as I did yesterday if there is doubt should a person be detained on doubt? We know the answer is NO! This is where the statute system then comes into play with its failings, where a single judge can take a single A4 paper of uncorroberated accusations from relatives whom have other motives and have no interest in the patients wishes & a single piece of A4 from a solicitor whom is also discharging the patients affairs with impunity for mismanagement and then proceed to hinder the patients application by delays and ignorance to evidence stating that there is no money for this case and I do not have the time really! If there is no money & he does not have the time really THEN WHY DOES HE NEED 5 REPORTS TO CONFIRM HER CAPACITY?? HOW SILLY? becasue at the very least we have already proved doubt, and if there is doubt you cannot convict, certainly in a common law court with a jury of 12 - does everybody understand why we want real justice not a KANGAROO ONE.
CONCLUSION DRAWN: You fill in the blanks because from where I am sitting you can be judged off vulnerability without any evidence of foul play and be placed within an institution without laws in place to keep you there! Furthermore if there is anyone around that person, wanting to defend or shout about the injustice served upon them from a refused consent statute injustice, then he too shall suffer further refused consent statute injustice to silence the critic usually by incarceration. This is commonly known as a dictatorship! The morals of UK British Justice have clearly deteriated into chaos and what will follow eventually from civil injustice? CIVIL UNREST. A statute justice system built and evolved from short cuts, from an arrangement with the executive, all connected to money is going to be the downfall of this country, its already here and happening under our very feet. We used to be proud of our justice system as a nation. How sad. Back to top

Monday 12.03.2012 20:00
A brother and sister's joint statement revealed at court today. Angela Wild and Kevin Clarke would like to see their mothers house sold against her will, their mother placed into care against her will, their own brother whom cared for their mother for 16 years thrown onto the street & the deputy Hugh Jones to remain as deputy in charge of their mothers affairs!! Beggars belief!! Still in a state of shock from reading this statement the Judge Justice Peter Jackson although his demeanor appeared reasonable he's answer to where consent was refused to statute hearings he said it was not required and so a ruling with an order infavour of HUGH JONES to instruct yet another Doctor or as stated "special" visitor to further have mother undergo another assessment of capacity(the 5th) charged at mothers expense another £1000. After a request for a common law court the answer came from the judge that this matter is a civil court and so this matter needed resolution from all parties to assist in cooperation. There was an exchange of conversaton regarding the injustice previously suffered and that we believed that the statute courts were not serving us with real justice. Talk of Ann's capacity was shifted to her vulnerability and that undue influence & accusations are laid from relatives of my misappropriation of funds, so I asked the judged "is a persons capacity judged on vulnerability"? he stated it was not, they are judged off capacity only and so the conversation went around for an hour about why would the court require yet another report and that if their was doubt should not her detention by the court be beyond reasonable doubt. He claimed he would feel more comfortable with another report as a comparison to what's already been written.
Before entering the court outside waiting for our arrival was a PANNONE LLP document server whom served upon me an unsealed, unsigned and unlawful injuction order under their Harrassment Charges. Hugh Jones stated after asking, during recess, that the first port of call is for me to pay them £25,000 into their offices as the clock would be now ticking. He indicated this matter is entirely seperate and I pointed out that this was impossible because if I was not caring for my mother why would I have protested outside his office or served a commercial lien. They are 100% linked as Mr Hugh Jones knows and that when he reduced my mothers income in Spain to below poverty not even covering her pension and DLA, as her carer needed to act in order to protect my mother, protection from any liability under Mental Capacity Act rules exists for carers and this he made no further comment.
One can read it all many ways. One can easily take the view though that when Hugh Jones commented that within 3 months there must be a trial for these harrassment charges and the judge inside the court commented on delays in mums case could be 3 months, if one adds 2+2 one could conclude a conspiracy to get me before courts prior to having to finalise mums request for discharge. Well, we'll see! All will come out in the wash! The things that I can conclude are that the judge stated refused consent to this hearing was irrelevant.
HUGH JONESs unlawful, refused consent, unsealed, unsigned order of injunction he states is now in force. When asked for clarification HUGH JONESs said and I quote I'm not trying to be coy but I don't know its a seperate issue entirely which we all know aint. The most crushing blow for me today was to read that your own flesh and blood seem to have a complete disregard for their own mothers wishes and that they continue to believe that not only are the 3 reports corrupt and not believeable, but that HUGH JONESs also is a diamond in the face of evidence available to the contary. I feel very low and very sad, mainly for mum. Its extremely distressing to think that her own flesh and blood would do what they do without care for her thoughts. On entry to the court they were greeted by mum pleased to see them but her first words uttered were that they must understand she wants to stay with Michael. How sincerely distressing for her will it be if they get their way and she is dragged off to a care home!! Of course that will be over my dead body or of course I do believe that PANNONEs conspiracy plan is to get me before a statute, friendly to them judge and have me incarcerated for the truths published here on this website. Its all very sick in its entirety! If anyone out there is considering looking after their relatives after an accident let this whole saga be a warning. We are supposed to be encouraging the care of the elderly in their own homes but the conspiracies here show very dark forces at work.
God help us all when we get old especially those relatives whom have property or money where their own will treat you as a child and will force their views upon you regardless of what you plead. What goes around will come around and those whom commit such actions will hopefully suffer the same or similar fait. One of my deepest singular fears for mum is that when her dysphasia or trouble speaking plays up then I have learnt to literally mind read what she wants as sometimes she can't put it into words, I visualise some uncaring carer just ignoring her request or treating her with contempt as you do about these things. I also am extremely concerned about the restriction placed upon her smoking routines where she takes great pleasure in being within her own domain smoking as she pleases. These major strong concerns I have for mum in her latter years that as long as I am a free individual will not happen without me being dead or incacerated! So bring it on you slaves to STATUTEs you have 2 choices. Get me into prison or see me dead because without one or the other there aint no Judge in this land gonna seperate me and my mother with or without your bungalow funds. Tell you what me and mum have already discussed we would rather live without it and this will be a topic for us over the next period of waiting time. I am sick to my stomach for mum and what she wanted that I seem helpless to put in place for her! The suffering goes on at the hands of STATUTES.
Further observations made were that because we realised this case was not being considered solely from her capacity based on the HUGH JONES statements I had read before court indicated that I needed to supply a bundle of of paperwork where within that paperwork lay the evidence to support my claims about Hugh Jones. When I ofered it to all three parties none seemed interested as though it was a forgone conclusion about what will happen. The Judge at the end of the hour long hearing offered to return the binder containing the evidence to support my claims against the deputy. Suggesting he had no time to read it and that to save it for a main hearing if needed. That I found a little strange because had this been submitted to a court of common law jurisdiction am sure it would have had more importance. It appeared to me that the request from HUGH JONES was a forgone conclusion! top

Monday 12.03.2012 06:30
Link to position statement merged with Hugh Jones statement and replies in bold.

Sunday 11.03.2012 20:55
Link to Hugh Jones statement and my reply in RED.
A trial that is unfolding on the internet that Pannone LLP are trying to shut down under an unlawful harrassment injunction that is unsigned by the judge, unserved under court rules and unconsented to by the defendant whom refused consent to statute acts unless a jury of 12 in a common law procedure was applied as is your right to insist upon but has been denied, flouting my legal lawful human rights fo fair trial under article 6 of convention rights. Through this media one can clearly see how statute so called justice can rush and ride roughshod over you without you knowing and thereby not giving you fair access to justice. Here you can clealry see how I have been given no time to submit statements etc needed and where demands can be made easily for excessive amounts of money from PANNONE to try and clearly deny you those lawful common rights that trust me, you are entitled.

Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40
Link to POSITION STATEMENT

Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40
Link to Statement of issue's

Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40
Link to Index Bundle top

Saturday 10.03.2012 10:40
Link to Case Summary

Thursday 08.03.2012 05:26
Link to a letter sent today, a formal request to ECHR (European Court of Human Rights & Protection of Civil Liberties) for formal intervention upon both cases in connection with my mothers care and her human rights breached alongside my own in matters related to the same.

Wednesday 07.03.2012 15:15
Link to more corruption & the Judge Justice Peter Jackson on Monday at 2pm 07/03/2012 don't look promising does it? The more research one does, the worse it gets.

Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:47
Link to PDF directions order just received about court hearing on Monday coming the 12th March where arrangements needed finalising before 4pm today.

Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:46
Link to email exchange with HUGH JONES top

Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:30
Link to new information found out today in a recorded conversation with Preston Courts. Prompt Reply from court of protection whom do not seem to know whats going on.

Wednesday 07.03.2012 10:25
Link to a recorded telephone call to Preston court this morning.

Wednesday 07.03.2012 07:15
Link to the Human Rights Review 05/03/2012 summary of 21 pages. Link to the Human Rights Review 05/03/2012 conclusion of 8 pages. top

Tuesday 06.03.2012 22:20
On the 17th November 2011 last year, my mother sent in to the court an application for immediate release based on enclosed medical reports. This was done due to reading the "direct gov website" which indicated any application sent with medical proof of capacity by its very nature would be dealt with as a fast track urgent matter! We are now 5 months down the line with still no JUSTICE. Link to the 79 pages, of the nearly forgot about application that is now nearing half a year, for a lady approaching 72 years of age that has capacity, that is now in fear of her liberty, living in exile, with her son whom after 16 years of care, has been threatened with prison!
Welcome to Britain in 2012, or could this Link be the reason for the delay - FOR THEIR EYES ONLY!! Link to The Justice and Security Green Paper. Designed to keep the press and public in the dark, these proposals will have serious implications for media freedom and the rights of potential victims and their families seeking answers or reparation through the courts or inquest proceedings.

Tuesday 06.03.2012 21:20
Link to fuller story,

Tuesday 06.03.2012 14:20
Friends Cheryl & John that have become closer than relatives share a moment in our orange grove villa with my partner James n me to discuss the purchase a commercial juicer! Some normality in a sea of human rights abuses that continue to threaten our entitlement to a normal family life.

Human rights
care protection
enquiry
by Martin Green

.

.

Link to this video a must watch! Human Rights Review yesterday 5th March 2012

Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:20
Link to Human rights blogger Barrister Adam Wagner and Medical specialist.

Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Link to Human rights acts downloads.

Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Link to Human Rights review 2012

Tuesday 06.03.2012 10:00
Link to Equality and human rights comission enquiry into the care of the elderly in their own homes and the promotion of such where the persons human rights to such count.

Tuesday 06.03.2012 08:30
Another email complaint to courts both Regional Preston Combined and Court of Protection about the deputy HUGH JONES failure to respond to emails.

Monday 05.03.2012 06:30
SNAPSHOT link to my to sisters 50th sent to the Morning Star public house. Its time to out the purpetrators of injustice!

Sunday 04.03.2012 16:30
SNAPSHOT link to my niece Danielle's facebook opinion of her own mother, my sister Angela, on her 50th birthday today. This gives an insight to the relationship of a mother and daughter whom where Angela, my mother's daughter is still trying to dictate to her own mother where and whom she should live with and also have complete disregard for the fact her own mother has got testomentorary capacity reports and where this very daughter is backing up the state and the corrupt solicitor in trying to keep her own mother in the states unlawful clutches in order to protect her own inheritance and prevent her mother gifting her own property to her son whom has cared for her 16 years. Combined with the financial discreditability I have offered upon this website about my own sister one can get a picture of the real personality.
Happy Birthday Angela! I hope your prowd of yourself. Not only does your own daughter hate and despise you, so do I, your brother! Your own mother is now taking the same views and I do believe your Grandson will also do in time!(4 generations). I today asked mine and your mother if she wished to contact you Angela on the phone but she declined, saying "No! I'll leave it for now".

Saturday 03.03.2012 10:30
Letter being drafted today with,
1. Our details (name, address and nationality).
2. The country UK against which you are making your application.
3. The facts that have given rise to your application.
4. The article or articles of the Convention that you say have been breached.
You should send your letter to:
The Registrar , European Court of Human Rights
Council of Europe , 67075 Strasbourg-Cedex
France
Fax: 00 33 3 88 41 27 30 - Tel: 00 33 3 88 41 20 18
Human rights link and the protection of civil liberties.

Friday 02.03.2012 06:30
2nd WARNING EMAIL to Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Regional Courts.

Thursday 01.03.2012 16:30
WARNING EMAIL to Hugh Jones, Court of Protection & Regional Courts.

Thursday 01.03.2012 13:30
Does this face look like the face of anxiety, a face that needs forcibly placing into care, a face that needs forcibly parting from the son that's cared for her for the last 16 years? What kind of country has the UK become to facilitate such crimes it's currently committing against families in its persuit of MONEY? Should anyone have the authority to steal off this person her property when she carries 4 doctors reports to state her capacity? What claim has anyone on her without her consent?
Taken on the 25th Feb 2012 having her lunch at the Golf Club.

Thursday 01.03.2012 05:30
Families fighting for justice in the UK.

Thursday 01.03.2012 05:30
The Philosophy of Liberty VIDEO

Thursday 01.03.2012 00:30
3rd Email yet again to HUGH JONES.

Wednesday 29.02.2012 22:30
Complaint yet again to the court.

Wednesday 29.02.2012 22:30
World wide protest about UK corruption and abuses committed by the UK.

Wednesday 29.02.2012 00:30
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION we start to investigate their involvement.

Thursday 01.03.2012 00:30
Email to HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION.

Tuesday 28.02.2012 12:30
WHAT IF?
The following video is not about me and my mother, its about another mother and her daughter but to all intents and purposes it might as well be about my mother and me, because the same injustices are happening to us! Welcome to .... UK INJUSTICE&CORRUPTION

Sunday 26.02.2012 13:30
2nd Further Email to Hugh Jones about deliberate withheld funds. NO REPLY

Sunday 26.02.2012 07:30
Further Email exchanges with the court of protection about my mothers application to be released/discharged on medical grounds that rather than just being reliant on them medical grounds it has to now go before an attended hearing where all those whom are not medical can have their say as to why my mother should not be released from the court of protection without having any medical qualifications. Reply from the court

Friday 24.02.2012 17:30
Email from my partner JAMES to Peter Jones

Friday 24.02.2012 16:30
Email from a Peter Jones whom has been reading the website for a year and whom wants to wade in with his opinion and my reply to him in RED.

Friday 24.02.2012 11:30
1st Email to Hugh Jones about withheld funds. NO REPLY

Thursday 23.02.2012 06:30
Email exchanges with the court of protection about my mothers application to be released/discharged on medical grounds that rather than just being reliant on them medical grounds it has to now go before an attended hearing where all those whom are not medical can have their say as to why my mother should not be released from the court of protection without having any medical qualifications. Why should my mother have to go through such sheer torture? The implication this gives out to all, is that even though one has 4 medical reports to show your capacity to make decisions upon your own life, others whom have no medical qualifications can sway or affect a judge's decision, whom also has no qualifications medically, into keeping a person trapped in this "monstrous system" where you are being robbed and plainly told, what you can and cannot do by the "dictatorship nanny state". GOD help us all when we get OLD! This state is only a "state of protection" for the judiciary and elite backed by inheritance hungry relatives, because it certainly aint protected my mother! They obviously believe they are protecting her from me her own son, a person whom my mother trusts alot more than the entirety of them, including her own other relatives whom have tried in vain to date to force upon her what they consider to be the right things by them to do in her life. The only protection being afforded here is the protection I am offering my mother from the blood sucking leaches of relatives and state officials whom were no where to be seen in 1996 to 2001 but when the money arrived, my GOD did they appear from nowhere. As a result have done nothing for our lives but wreck it. 11 years of HELL for my mother and me. The misery endured over the 5 years prior to the award of money in 2001 has paled into insignifigance when set side by side with the suffering endured over the last 11 years. Let this be your example, on how to wreak havoc in family life and trash Article 8 of Human Rights where entitlement to a private family life does not exist in the UK.

Wednesday 22.02.2012 06:30
Statement about our current position.

Tuesday 21.02.2012 19:30
Youtube video link of Paul Drockton about HOLLIE GREIG. A serious UK SCANDAL not unlike our own.

Tuesday 21.02.2012 13:30
Youtube video link of 1 hour on the Lou Collins radio show yesterday with Brian Gerrish of UK Column talking about the imprisonment last week of Robert Green whom was trying to bring justice for Holly Greig case and also Ian Puddick who's website www.policeexpenses.co.uk was attempted to be shut down where he was exposing police corruption going right up to the top. The parting comments of these issue's is to show how our own police and corrupt state is turning more and more like a soviet based system and where I personally have commented their is likely to be at this point in time more freedoms given in Russia than there is in the current UK system that's rife with severe unjust out of control INJUSTICE.

Tuesday 21.02.2012 16:04
Cartoon chat about the OPG.
Opposing PANNONEs Guardians

Monday 20.02.2012 14:30
Youtube video of Andrew Neil and Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming talk about super-injunctions, protecting the rich, powerful, and depraved from having their scandals becoming made public, under the pretext of privacy.

Monday 20.02.2012 12:30
Youtube video of John Hemming MP Exposing CORRUPTION in SECRET FAMILY COURTS.John Hemming MP bravely exposes the corruption in the secret family court system (and court of protection) he is the only MP to stand up to this and calls for the removal of some judges who seem to be in some kind of collusion with what is going on. He talks about bribery, and government targets and rewards.

Monday 20.02.2012 12:09
Read this, about serious injustice comitted this week, to man handing out leaflets about sexual abuse comitted by high office that needed to shut him up, and so Friday last the 17th he was sent to Prison for 1 year. Youtube link of FREE ROBERT GREEN & WEBSITE

Monday 20.02.2012 11:04
Read a letter written in 2010 about the abuses of the court. Has anything changed?

Friday 10.02.2012 13:04
Read an open, draft letter to Court Judge Mrs Justice Sharp and Pannone LLP.

Friday 10.02.2012 10:04
Ann's video claim of right
Exiled again .. My mother Ann speaks above in a short video about her intentions from our second home, where the first home in Blackpool has become politically unsafe to stay in, due to the onslaught of illegal, unlawful total injustices, that are being forced upon us by unscrupulous representatives of the judicial system in corrupt manners, where common law jurisdiction requested is being totally ignored & refused and ridden roughshod over by so called statute justice that was refused consent?

Watch this video!
To educate yourself about the two beings that you are, without you knowing it. The contract you and the real you. Common law and Statute law and what is real and not real only by consent, your consent. A consent taken from you on an assumption and by fear. Stand up and refuse, you can, it is your rights. We are losing them if we don't ACT!

Wednesday 01.02.2012 0738
Further collation of evidence in relation to the highly questionable solicitors conduct, Hugh Jones, was sent yesterday to the SRA solicitors regulatory authority first class.

Wednesday 01.02.2012 0638
My mother today is filing a "claim of right" alongside a video of the same.

Wednesday 01.02.2012 0002
Read an open reply/letter to Pannone and Court.

Tuesday 31.01.2012 1545
One can clearly see where all this is heading. The judiciary are conspiring to collectively deny me my common law right to a trial by a jury in which they know will provide real justice. They are heading down a road of attempting to bring a case of harrasement against me in an unlawful hearing by refusal of consent that will blacken my name to acredit those people whom are operating upon my mothers funds in a fraud by false representation and have been doing so for 11 years. In an effort to try and protect my mother attention has been drawn to this via the media and protesting alongside our common law right to issue a claim in the form of a "commercial lien" that by the "old pals act" they have concocted a hearing to then issue an injunction gagging order upon me in the hope I will break it leading to their unlawful use of "contempt of court" by an unsigned invalid Judges order! Does this not just stink of UK corruption. All the while my mothers application to be released from this whole corrupt saga has been put indefinately on HOLD! According to court of protection official "Mark Obiaguru", on speaking to Monday gone the court delay in this matter can be open ended he said, when pushed he said anything from 2 weeks to 12 months. When pushed further he said and I quote, "its tuff" and I will not put you through to a supervisor! - conversation recorded! Is it any wonder people are in exile from the UK - true!! Is it not now true that our rights to free speech are being diminished. Mums rights to a solicitor that she can pay for removed. CORRUPTION no other word for it!

Tuesday 31.01.2012 1345
Read about Judges unsigned orders.

Monday 30.01.2012 1800
Read an unsigned Judges order of no validity!

Thursday 26.01.2012 1100
Because we believe the judicial system to have evolved into a corrupt manner where our common right claims have been distorted and refused, the statement of affidavit below here was submitted to the court and it was ignored with the same contempt that is being used and threatened against us in an unlawful adminstrative hearing that is evident in the judgement now published above with the evidence there to see where no signature is displayed on that order making it invalid. It also flagrantly uses the term/threat of contempt of court where the judge knowingly or of course should do, that this is a creature of common law for common law courts and not statute hearings! Are alarm bells starting to ring because they are with me! Would'nt it be nice and convenient for the justice system to lock me up and therefore shut me up in a convenience of contempt where the threat alone was illegal to use!

Thursday 26.01.2012 1000
Read my affidavit submitted to the adminstrative hearing that was IGNORED!.

Wednesday 25.01.2012 1345
"Pannone is the obvious catastrophic choice for injury claims in the north west"

Tuesday 24.01.2012 0850
Contempt of Court is a common law offence and firstly because of its very nature by potential removal of liberty demands that it should be by way of a seperate trial that you are entitled to. Contempt of court is not a statute offence in hearings where the hearing is for as it is described for people to be heard and by its very essence is a consenting event where all parties consent and if any of those parties do not consent then it formerly becomes an "unlawful adminstrative hearing". Awareness of these issue's are becoming known more frequently and as the saying goes "we are all equal under the law" but thats only if you are aware of the law. Already in various statements I have seen, where a person is being threatened with contempt of court and this is the sort of threats, harassment and intimidation used by the legal system to put you down and keep you down. Its called a GRAND DECEPTION. It's fine for the legal system to "intimidate" and "harass" us but if they even suspect your doing that to them! We have suffered harrasment and intimidation through subtle effects for 11 years. Look at our keywords wallpaper and all these can be attributed to incidents over these 11 years. Should any up standing member of the UK have to deal with these things on day to day year by year continued exposure. Its shear unadulterated relentless mental cruelty thats draining away whats supposed to be the twilight remainder of a human beings existence.

Monday 23.01.2012 1930
Brief statement: Increasingly my mother is becoming more and more concerned for my well being and I am trying to re-assure her everything will be fine, don't worry.
Its a sad country we live in when you have do such things in order to gain the attention to complaints made to all authorities without responsible resolutions being brought in an amicable fashion. The complaints we have made to, for example the SRA(Solicitors Regulatory Authority);
The SRA say this;
1. Upon taking up an investigation we do not provide you with updates!
2. We do not provide you with a conclusion.
In fact the SRA provide you with a letter to state; that they are investigating, but there it stops.
Now if we were to rely on this as a source for resolution how are we to know
a/ whether it has ended?
b/ Is it Continued?
c/ has it resolved?
You are simply left in the dark! Whats the point of complaining!
When you complain to the OPG who may start an investigation & 7 months later, upon getting as I did a 3 line reply stating their investigation is completed and we find no wrong!! So you ask for a copy of the full investigation! IT is denied!
Now if as PANNONE LLP say these avenues are open to us. I ask, what is OPEN about that?
My mother is saying tonight, Oh! Mike let's forget about it probably meaning don't bother fighting any more for her rights, leave it! We have each other! But would that be right? What about all those mothers of PANNONE Partners that they have, do they feel for their mothers as I do mine! Or are they just psychopaths, without any such feeling? Our entitlement to a Private Family life under article 8 of the HUMAN RIGHTS treaty has been trashed over 11 years. There has been a relentless onslaught of injustices at the hands of THE COURT OF PROTECTION. This is a failed system with very serious misgivings. And now further they are trying to take away our free speech by placing an injunction inclusive of our website? What is this country turning in to? I would probably at this moment feel safer in somewhere like Russia. There is more dictatorship going on now in Britain than there probably is there. We seem to exude human rights violations whilst preaching to other country's to observe them. Hypocrites for politicians. There will be civil war in this country, I can see it. No wonder we have fringe groups as PANNONE refer to them. These people are in Lawful Rebellion and Pannone wonder why? I am a son of a mother. I have good character. My mother is not an item to be treated as in a game of "pass the parcel" as I believe would be the result if other people continue to dictate where she should live etc. We need to be left alone - those are my mothers wishes.

Monday 23.01.2012 1700
Read the Judges Order.

Monday 23.01.2012 1235
To note... Our costs today in this particular matter are approximately £20,000

Monday 23.01.2012 1225
Read our claim to "COMMON LAW JURISDICTION" and a trial by jury request being sent in to the court soon and our reasons why, where we are questioning the Judge Mrs Justice Sharp's integrity!

Monday 23.01.2012 1220
Telephone call to court whom inform me that the adjournment was granted but only for 3 days to the 26th January 2012, better get busy eh!

Monday 23.01.2012 0920
Read Adjournment Requested, acknowledged received by the recorded telephone conversation with the court at 9.20am

Friday 20.01.2012 1530
Read Hugh Jones s "scare tactic" "harassment" & "intimidation" statement of costs for their proposed temporary injunction application of £23,007 to attempt to prevent the collection of our £9 million judgement "deed of debt". I do believe that if they are successful, on a court part 20 counterclaim form, £9,000,000 minus £23,007 will leave them still owing to me and mum of £8,976,993 I wonder how they propose to settle the balance? Oh! hang on, I forgot, silly me! OUR claim stated to add all other related costs, so one can add the £23,007 to the £9,000,000 leaving a balance owing of £9,023,007. Wonderful! Nice to have "common law" on your side! LOLs The BBC have also been notified of their injunction hearing. Read BBC

Thursday 19.01.2012 2359
Read Hugh Jones s statement against my mothers release application from the court and his mal administered deputyship and read my reply statement

Thursday 19.01.2012 1337
Read a daughters witness statement to try and keep her mother from being a free person in the face of medical evidence supporting her release and also my witness statement in reply attached to it.

Monday 09.01.2012 1330
Response to the threat of temporary injunction order application and accompanied request to sign letter of undertaking from PANNONEs.

Sunday 08.01.2012 1600
"Financial Rape" can be the one and only term used to describe what's going on and is the reason I would rather go to prison than to see, or allow it, to continually be the manner in which PANNONEs and the OPG conduct themselves upon my mother. i.e.; When people take financial advantage of those less fortunate than themselves because they can. When solicitors quote you £1400p.a. and take £26,377 then are still sending you bills because they can, that's financial rape. Doctors charging people with Cancer, ten's of thousands of dollars for treatment because they know the patients have no other choice - that's financial rape.

Sunday 08.01.2012 1140
Peter Hofschröer a man and his mother I have come to know whom is experiencing the same problems we have with the OPG that lives in exile in Austria and whom both him and his mother would love to return to live back in England but live in fear of doing so under the corruption and extortion rackets currently going on in the UK where even MPs are not going about their business to rectify the problems paid to do so.

Sunday 08.01.2012 0840
Read about the Commercial Lien process here to educate yourself on how to put right the wrongs of others without the expense of statute courts & where all other lines of complaint have failed you as is the case with ourselves.

Saturday 07.01.2012 1640
Notice & PRESS RELEASE of debt advertisement appearing soon.

Saturday 07.01.2012 1200
14 Page Notice received from PANNONEs whom intend to apply for an interim injunction to prevent me recording their now defaulted upon "deed of debt" of £9 million pounds upon the land registry of each and every Pannone Partner x 50 of, houses or land, on the grounds of harassment!
They claim that our claim is "invalid" and that by standing behind a Limited Liability Partnership they hold a protection afforded to them. Unfortunately what they are failing to recognise is that this became a matter of a criminal nature and as such, under common law are culpable & responsible vicariasly by the partnership condoning the criminal actions of another partner! It has always been our intentions to settle in an amicable fashion, but all they have done is harass me and my mother by their condoned criminal actions, of which proof is in my possession! Which in itself, if we reach a statute court we will issue a massive counterclaim! Additionally, under section 5a) of our commercial affidavit of truth sworn on oath and now stands as a deed of truth by failing to rebut it, states that NO JUDGE can abrogate or stand in its way or they too become criminally liable!
What PANNONEs partners are now feeling is I believe, exactly what my mother has been made to feel by HUGH JONESs actions, where at her age of 71 to start to feel homeless and insecure by him considering selling her property and fraud by false representation in not allowing her to do with her property as she so HUMAN RIGHTLY deserves to do, provides untold "ANXIETY", "DISTRESS", "HARASSMENT", "INTIMIDATION" and "I.I.E.D."(intentional infliction of emotional distress) that becomes within the realm of "beyond comprehension". PANNONE partners feelings now, might be able to bear a fruit of understanding, as what it is now like, to be feeling what my own mother is feeling.
LOSS OF YOUR OWN HOME

Thursday 05.01.2012 1200
Email to PANNONE PARTNERS warning of looming default notice expiry and the consequences that will follow. By the lack of response to the sworn on oath allegations made about Pannones LLP that they have by default legitimised our looming protest and we now invite their threat of harassment and libel charges.

Thursday 05.01.2012 1130
Email not responded to.
Response & further reply

Thursday 05.01.2012 1030
Others with severe unaddressed complaints.

Thursday 05.01.2012 0400
The Public/Predatory Guardians Business Plan for 2012.

Thursday 05.01.2012 0046
Corruption in UK courts that people must become more aware of. In an Affidavit to be read here, by Susan Forscey Moore dated 11.09.06 she states under oath that it is her carefully considered opinion, given with all due respect, based upon personal experience and knowledge, that English courts are not fair and impartial tribunals where things get put right. English courts are corrupt forums based on unwarranted privilege which perversely excuse and conceal the gravest of misconduct.

Wednesday 04.01.2012 1205
The Commercial Lien / claim served upon defendants solicitor Hugh Jones + 49 partners & Martin John Chief of Public Guardian on the 19th Dec 2011 had 14 days to respond and has now expired, therefore a Notarised Default Notice has been sent today by receipted emails to all 51 parties and a recorded one sent to Hugh Jones and Martin John.

Wednesday 04.01.2012 1200
This is it: A Statute is a rule created by a representative governing body of a society designed to create common goals, which carries the force of law by the consent of the governed. Hold on to the thought "... by the consent of the governed", because that is a crucial thought. The long explanation can be crystalised into this definition.
Are you the Government? No. Therefore you must be 'the governed'. A Statute only carries the force of law upon you if you consent to it. If you do not give your consent, a Statute cannot affect you in any way whatsoever. And the courts know this. You may not, but they certainly do. And the last thing they will do is tell you. In point of fact they will hide this from you at every opportunity. On the other hand, if you tell them, they will accept it because they know it is actually true.

Visitor No: hits

Mp3 recorded meeting of 1HOUR 18.07.11 that clearly shows the start of the process to steal my mothers home
06.10.11 OPG Rep: Meeting Recorded - LISTEN to it.(2HRS)

This is the website of an OPG patient
and her son - carer.

A few words about us, our website and its slogan
"He who cares, wins!"

In June 1995 my mother Ann was 55 - After a long period of depression tried to end her life but tragically it ended her as we knew her & she only awoke from her coma 11 months later to find her new existance as a disabled woman needing 24hr care. Mike was from a Entreprenaur backround of Nightclubs Pubs, Tourism and Hotel life suddenly found himself to be that very carer at the age of 37.

After the obvious glaring failures committed by the ROYAL OLDHAM HOSPITAL a lawsuit case against them was launched in 1995 and some 6 years later in 2001 a compromised out of court settlement of damages was awarded in excess of £775,000. Mum, after 11months in hospital was discharged to a nursing home but the pain to the family of seeing her in there of only a few weeks brought about the decision to care for her at our own homes initially shared for a short period by my sister and I. In 1997 I took on the roll of full time carer and have done so to date, a period of 16 years.

The Website History -

This site has been launched because we emigrated permanent(March 2008) but find that mums estate is still trapped in the UK and as such our security back up when things are not right, of referring to our MP will be removed and thus our spanish option leaves us with a language barrior problem.
Therefore we decided to place the correspondence in the public domain to be judged by all. These link files to the left in column 1 are being documented in reverse order from whatever is todays date, in other words the latest current documents are on the top of the list and because the launch date of this site was only the 3rd April 2010 more and more information will be added over time as its our intention to expose the fundamental misgivings of the original intentions of the COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Anyone can see clearly if pouring over these documents an understanding of the where the name change came from with reference to NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION. We hope this website can also help others whom have serious problems with the OPG and its affiliated deputy's. Its my personal experience in many cases that money is horded away from the patient only to serve as inheritance to relatives whom played little or no role in the care of the affected patient ensuring the best possible existance to the end of their days. My own mother's award was predicted to have only lasted 10 years and her award was based on that prediction and its a testament to good care that her life expectancy is exceeding this prediction by far but that it would not do if constricted by the narrow brush approach of deputies hording vast sums of money away only to protect their long term fees and charges which are vastly in excess usually of what was supposed to have been laid down guidelines from the OPG.

We spent 6 years fighting a court case to get the award and then only to spend then next 10 years fighting the receiver to get it off him. Our lives are permanently blighted by the ongoing struggle in which the original award was supposed to solve. We cannot understand how, in 2010, a little known about corrupt UK government body can continue doing what they do in an unaccountable secret fashion, with lack of transparency and openness that the Cameron/Clegg government is currently promoting.

Though there is today (110410) still alot to resolve we do have a level of life to enjoy where we now live, in the Costa Del Sol, never to return again to the corrupt country from where we were born, THE UK unless of course its by the intimidatory way they are handling our finances and effectively continually trying to blackmail us into returning to the UK.

A testament to good care mum is still going strong at 70 years of age recently on the 9th August 2010 taken during a birthday meal in Benalmedina, Spain.

SOME OF THE FAMILY HISTORY

Born in Middleton, Manchester in 1940 the eldest one of seven mum fast grew up having to learn the rigors of life & at the age 16 she found love married and moved in with her new husband a journey the would last 36 years.

Mum never knew her real father he was missing at war presumed dead, when at the end of the war he returned only to find my mums mum, Grandma pregnant with another mans child whom then decided to leave. Mums real father also left and never returned, he went on to become a Director on the board of British Aerospace a person whom never came to see, find or even acknowledge his own 2 daughters.

With three children and now alone my mums mum, Grandma eventually found another love whom fathered a further four more children with her. My mother being the eldest of seven was very soon helping at an early tender age to look after and bring up her siblings virtually as an additional mother to them

After marriage at 16 mum at 19 gave birth to me, 3 years later my sister and one year later my brother. Our family was VERY close. My sister and I bonded more and more over time. I remember all going out at night to our local for evenings all as one close family for many happy times. When I reached 16 I knew I was Gay I confided in my sister, mother and father but chose to pacify them all by saying I was bisexual and dating girls until the age of 26. For ten whole years I struggled to accept that I was never really bisexual at all and the pain that brought resulted in relentless up and down depressive symptoms, which on reflection were burdened on to my mother. She carried them times for me very much where suicide was a frequent consideration and she helped me thro to better times. This was a debt to my mother for which it became easier to repay when she needed me after her life changing accident in 1995.

At the age of 26 I suddenly became concious of the fact that I am what I am and that was the end of my relationships with women that tormented me from being the person I really was. From this point on depression for me became a thing of the past and I personally believe it was my mother whom helped carry me thro that ten year period in my life.

Our upbringing was of a working class family background on predominantly a council estate but that my father thro his business ideas directed several businesses giving me a true insight to that side of life. We were if you like, "bigger fish" in a small pond, respected by the neighbours and life was relatively good though there were lean times especially when my father went bankrupt, a period in his life I swore I'd never go thro.

In 1994 whilst I was directing my own four independant small businesses it became very apparent that my parents marriage was suffering and it was evident on their faces, eventually leading to divorce papers and seperation. It was at this point that mum started a period of depression that would lead up to her near fatal suicide attempt on 23rd June 1995 whilst in my presence in front of my house. I was 36. I only started to enjoy my life from the age of 26, 10 years I held dear, a very good and happy 10 years, but it was over!

Mum had deliberately ran under a 32 ton truck with an extra trailor attached at the rear, I really don't know how but she went under the middle section and only one of it's 18 wheels caught her left foot and caused some damage but unfortunately her skull was fractured. She then had continuous brain swelling over 24 hrs. Her coma lasted months and months, her prognosis was very poor and she was expected to die but her fighting spirit and prayers kept her alive.

I on the other hand lost all fighting spirit, I tryed to continue with my businesses for months but eventually it got to me with flashbacks and depression. Caring for mother slowly over time became the top priority not by choice but by nesseccity. Lives had changed for ever at a stroke June 1995.

I went on to spend an inordinate amount of time energy and fighting spirit to help mum to learn how to talk again and walk again against all odds given by doctors whom had given up. You can clearly see the results 15 years on by the pictures above of mum now 70. All this though has ruined my own life and existence as an entreprenaur and has robbed me of my dignity where personal wealth is concerned. If mum suddenly died I will be left homeless and destitute with nothing but yet I will of created lots of fat cat lawyers fees over the years with an inheritance bonus for waiting relatives. Is this right? I don't think so! Thus I now am hated and dispised by relatives and the courts because I am here fighting my corner for what I believe to be right, some justice for RELATIVE CARERS IN PRIVATE DAMAGES AWARDS.

Some peace at THE MOMENT in our new home, September 2010 but how long for? Back to top

Where would you rather live, be honest! Should mum be put in a old folks home, should she be in her rainy home town of Oldham, forced to live in her daughters back bedroom or do you just believe she's in the right place? This is what I am fighting to maintain for mum, what she truely deserves. Its her money to spend on how she wants to live, its not there for others to run up solicitors bills squabbling and it certainly ain't there for inheritance! How long our life will exist we do not know as the background currently is a concotion of corrupt statements trying to discredit my care for mum on a welfare and financial basis in order to deprive mum of her liberty living and cared for by me, her son abroad where she has capacity to choose where and with whom she wants to live with.

Taken today at the golf course 161210 mum wanted a taste of what the golfing fuss is all about would she get this sort of treatment in a home - I doubt it extremely.

JUST A NOTE FOR THE WEEK 09.06.2011 The money I now receive personally each week that is classed as expenses and as such mums deputy will not pay it as a wage because he said it would cost more for mum as she would pay tax on it. Well interesting that isn't it. Whilst normal folk whom do a job get a wage slip I don't and when I go to open a bank account they say well Mr Clarke where is your income and when I point to it they say thats not proper income Mr Clarke. Likewise how can one proceed proper with one's life for example how does one get a mortgage so as to have your own property over your head. If my mother lacks the capacity to recognise these things then why is it that she wants to display her concern by trying to gift her pproperty by way of JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY & why can't the British government along with its corrupt establishment see it all, or can they?. Its very obvious really whom the theives are in all this mess but who'd of thought that in 2011 in Britain, this would be going on, but it is!

The court of protection say well if your abroad you can apply to take charge of your mother affairs in that country and when you have done it apply to the UK courts to have the assets and cash released to you but they fail to recognise that in reality my mother has nothing to prove in another country why should she demonstrate to the UK government her capacity or lack of when they hold no jurisdiction in the country of her residence. They are in reality extending their jurisdiction without it being legal in any way. In the meantime their corrupt deputies do there dirty work whilst your outside of the UK. My god, so corrupt its unreal. I spoke to lawyers here in Spain they advised that the cost of an application would possibly exceed £3000 and only have a 50/50 chance of success. So where does one start? Not very nice to think that your own country is effectively screwing you over and taking advantage of the elderly whom clearly have the capacity to manage their own finances.

Taken today 9.06.11 this is what mum sees to be the type of "home" she wants to reside in till she dies. This is our current rented property in Spain that we have been negotiating to swap with mums UK property but as soon as mums deputy got wind of it he tried to sell her UK property for figures approaching £100,000 less than its value and this is the type of thing your up against!

F.A.C.T Families Against Court of Protection Theft is an organisation of those who have had problems dealing with the Court of Protection (CoP) and Office of Public Guardian (OPG) and are based in the UK. There has been 15,735 recorded complaints of abuse, fraud and corruption from Dec 2001- Dec 2010 (9 years) of the CoP and OPG in the UK.

There are over 50,000 people plus their families affected by these abuses of the Court of Protection, Office of Public Guardian and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) jurisdiction which is also part of the Court of Protection and many young adults who may have autism or aspergers have been wrongfully put under this jurisdiction depriving them from their liberties. Some people would most definitely dispute that these disorders should not even come under Mental Health and whether these young adults are even a threat to anyone.

The Court of Protection and the Office of Public Guardian are a Government run Court based in Archway Tower, Archway, London. It deals with property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity or who are unable to make decisions for themselves. Those deemed to lack capacity are many Elderly people who may suffer from Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Disabled People, Road Accident victims awarded compensation and even young adults who maybe Autistic or suffer from Asperger's Syndrome.

The Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian are responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney, and Lasting Powers of Attorney, appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.

However we are very concerned with the way it is run and from recent press such as

1.Daily Mail talks about abuses within the CoP and

2.Guardian 2005 talks about mishandling finances and 97 people having to be compensated for "bad investments and lost cash", they mean FRAUD, it shows how the CoP has been open to corruption, fraud> and abuse in legal terms understood as embezzlement.

As well as police corruption shown by Hoddesdon/Hertford police force as they protect the corrupt, accept bribes and even come to court and lie on Oath. Not to also mention corruption by all those we have reported to and are doing absolutely nothing. This includes SRA, Legal Ombudsman, Parliamentary Ombudsman, all our MPs, House of Lords and all our police forces. It is beyond a national DISGRACE!

Further articles to show Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian Corruption:

3.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse (NASGA)

4.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse Blog

5.Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud

6.Another Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud for embezzling $1.2 million in 12 years

7.UK Court of Protection Forum for Victims claiming CoP abuse and fraud

8.UK Court of Protection being investigated

9.UK Court of Protection involved in Mass Fraud

10.Estate of Denial website claim UK CoP involved in Mass Fraud

11.UK Mass Fraud Anajinn Blog Concerns

12.UK Elderly man embezzled £549,000 by Deputy Solicitors Firm, Judkins Solicitors and Judge Henderson cover up fraud

13.Why would Judge Launcelot Henderson also known as Henderson J cover up the fraud? Because he is part of the Court of Protection

14.UK Mark Neary 20 year old autistic son abuse under Deprivation of
Liberty Order of the Court of Protection

15.Anna Raccoon concerns over Steven Neary case

16.UK Families Against Court of Protection Blog

17.UK Families Against Court of Protection on Facebook

18.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse also on Facebook

19.Ellee Seymour talks about UK Government plans for a Review

20.UK Mark Reeves Case-Road Accident Victim awarded £2.5 million compensation goes to Court fees! They mean SFA (Solicitors Fraud Association)

21.Daily Mail Low IQ woman case

22.Anna Raccoon previous CoP Employee concerns

23.More Anna Raccoon

24.UK Carer for his mother concerns-moved to Spain to escape corruption


25.BBC File on 4

26.BBC File on 4 Documentary

27.Demanding new Prime Minister to Investigate on Your Freedom Forum

28.Telegraph reports

29.The Independent reports

30.Telegraph reports on Autistic Pianist

31.BBC Tips for Power of Attorneys/Lasting Power of Attorneys to avoid the Court of Protection although CoP can overrule these. We did say they are CORRUPT!

32.UK Human Rights Blog Concerns

33.Ellee Seymour Concerns

34.UK Indigo Jo Blogs

35.Advocates for National Guardian Reform (ANGR) Victims and their Stories

36.CBS News catch onto Mass Fraud in Public Guardian America

37.The National Organization to End Guardianship Abuse (NOTEGA)

38.Another Public Guardian worker in America imprisoned for Fraud. When will the UK Government start arresting those involved in the UK Mass CoP Fraud?

39.FACT are very aware of Will and Property Deed Forgery! NHS Yvette Adams Abuse

40.NHS Fraud Louise Tomkins Case

41.NHS Fraud Angolia Dephew Case

42.Directors of Will making firm imprisoned for Fraud-Nicholas Butcher and David Nash Case

43.Corrupt UK Government only change legislation if they receive payment!

44.Lee Gilliland case concern reported by the Telegraph

45.This is Bristol also talks about Lee Gilliland case

46.David Cameron and Parliaments concerns over Privacy Laws ie secretive Court of Protection

47.Daily Mail talks about relationship of gagging orders, injunctions being abused in the Courts especially by the Court of Protection

48.John Hemming MP Court of Protection must be reformed reported by The Telegraph

49.Three Cheers for John Hemming MP by Alex Massie

50.Journalists have Gagging orders banning them reporting/investigating Court of Protection victims cases otherwise will be imprisoned for Contempt of Court

51.Neil Barker's Case

52.Ellee Seymour mentions protest on Fri 29th April 2011

Flaws in the Court of Protection (CoP) were highlighted in a negative press campaign last autumn 2010. The CoP and the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) shared more than 4,000 complaints about its operations over the last two years. It is still being accused of mismanaging £2.7 billion it controls and which is held on behalf of those who no longer have capacity (Ps). Critics claim that it holds the money in a Bank of England account paying 0.5% a year rather than at High Street banks which would provide rates of three per cent. As inflation takes hold it leaves families with an income deficit needing to dig into the capital set aside for a lifetime of care.

The newspapers' campaign An eye catching headline in the Mail on Sunday described the CoP as "The Secret Court of Living Hell". Case histories investigated in the newspaper's campaign included: •An application to the CoP for money to pay fees for residential care taking too long to be processed. P's house sale proceeds were paid into an account held by the court. The money took five months to come through and was £10,000 short of the £35,000 which was required. The aggrieved relative said he was never able to speak to the same person twice about the matter. •P was awarded £1.6 million. When her father died an application was made by her mother to take over from him as the person authorised to run P's financial affairs. The fees came to around £42,000 for solicitors, barristers and accountants. •P's house sale proceeds were transferred into the wrong account. The mistake was only discovered when there was a request to pay P's care home fees. •An administration charge of £4,100 to access £5,800 out of the £90,000 held by the CoP. P, a former solicitor suffering from bi polar disorder, complained requests for money which were supposed to take six weeks were taking five months and that the payments received were less than asked for. •The father of an eight year old boy who had been awarded £4.2 million as a result of medical negligence was accused of being abusive to an official from the CoP on a home visit although nobody had visited him at their home.

There were complaints in particular about delays, expense, the long and obscure court forms, inefficiency and that the court was a remote entity serving itself. These were accelerated by the press attaching links to the articles censuring the Court. In The Mail alone 450 further accusations of incompetence followed on from one article. Internet forums posted comments that it sent bullying letters and treated relations like criminals. Saga magazine quoted children's author Helen Bateman whose husband was in a coma after an accident: "It is an alien, intrusive, time consuming and costly institution which was completely out of tune with what we were going through".

Court of Protection Rules Committee's Review In November the then Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, responded to the concerted attacks by the press. A General Election was on the horizon and the Court was being described as an unresponsive Labour monolith working in secret and grinding its users down. Mr Straw asked Sir Mark Potter, the then President of the Family Division, to appoint a Rules Committee to investigate and recommend changes. The committee was chaired by Mr Justice Charles and Mrs Justice Proudman.

The committee met four times in the spring of 2010 and published a report in July 2010. There was recognition of the need for new court forms to be available as quickly as possible. They were to be custom made for the different types of application to avoid containing the lengthy screeds of unnecessary information the original universal forms require. Better explanatory notes are recommended to be attached to the forms as the current ones have led to confusion. Clearer forms would lower the 80% refusal rate for applications received between January 2008 and December 2009 to deal with property and welfare decisions on behalf of the mentally vulnerable. Forty per cent of applications are made by people without professional support. This is a failure in communication and assists those who fear the Court is composed of civil servants and lawyers busy talking to themselves while failing to provide a simple application process. Fortunately the new forms will be road tested in pilot schemes. Their success will depend on using simple English aimed at non-professionals.

A further recommendation is that court officers, rather than judges, should deal with applications concerning non-contentious property and affairs. Previously nominated officers were trained to deal with routine applications and there was lobbying for their return. There is provision for judges to review those decisions and it will make running the Court easier. Other recommendations of the Rules Committee address speeding up and simplifying procedure in response to the complaints of delay.

A key recommendation is that there should be no change in the rules concerning access to proceedings by the public. When and whether the Court should sit in public or permit its proceedings to be made public will be decided in each case by the judge. In March 2010 the Court of Appeal had already handed down a judgement on the application by the press to be permitted access to a hearing concerning Derek Paravicini, described as a human iPod. He is an autistic, high earning pianist living in sheltered accommodation, needing 24 hour care and unable to manage his finances. The press had been agitating against the Court's closed hearings in a high profile campaign. It was held that article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights covered access to information at a court hearing and there could be no blanket exclusions. The Court of Appeal held that decisions on press access should be within the discretion of the judge hearing the case. The Rules Committee followed the case law but decided against blanket open access.

Scrutiny by the public In May 2010 an open judgment was handed down by Sir Nicholas Wall in DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS [2010] EWHC 1217 concerning a woman aged 55 who had learning difficulties and an overwhelming fear of hospitals and medical treatment. She was deemed not to have mental capacity and unable to make a decision about her treatment. The President ruled that she could be given a drug in a glass of Ribena at her home and detained afterwards on a ward for treatment of cancer of the uterus. Fair reporting in this case though did include Mencap's support for the court's life sustaining decision This re-opened the continuing debate in the press about the court having sweeping powers handed to it by the Labour government that were not open to scrutiny and openness. Previously decisions about life and death , sterilisations and abortions were made in public and could be reported by the media. Profound questions as to when the State can intervene in private life were aired. Fears were voiced that paternalistic doctors would combine with judges to make vital decisions behind closed doors, thus eroding the rights of the individual. The media continue to oppose blocked access on the basis that it more appropriate for countries whose leaders do not like their authority to be questioned.

Another press campaign led to the naming of a local authority which had treated a vulnerable person and their relations in a high handed manner without authority. The latest judgement released to the press concerned "birth control by force". Mr Jusice Bodey in August 2010 criticised a Midlands council who wanted a married woman aged 29 with an IQ of 53 to be sedated, taken from her home and have birth control imposed on her against her will. The plan to prevent her having children he held had shades of social engineering. There would need to be police involvement and contraception under restraint which he could not authorise under the circumstances The Court does not have to handle these types of cases often. Public decision making should be encouraged. Ethical life changing decisions ought to reflect current social, rather than legal, values. Keeping people informed reassures them that judges are in tune with the current moral climate and not remote elderly beings living in a world of their own.

Court of Protection's First Report In June 2010 the Court published its first report, covering its performance between October 2007 and January 2010. The target for an oral hearing within 6 weeks was met in 53% of applications compared with the target of 75%. The Senior Judge explains the shortfall in performance by insufficient Judges. He hoped the appointment of three full time judges in 2010 would help meet targets. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which created the new Court of Protection did not provide for deputies (part time judges). Full time judges had to be brought in from the regions to cover the London work. The five regional centres were designed to take the hearing centres to the client .This had an impact of the regions that deal with 60% of the work. A more flexible system would be to amend the statute to provide for deputies. They could be drafted in to help with the work flow and be a pool of experienced potential permanent judges.

Applications were analysed. There were 40,000 applications concerning property and affairs and 95% of them did not require court attendance. Forms to apply for a power of attorney had been reduced from 25 pages to 12. There were 2,800 personal and welfare applications with a refusal rate of 80%. There were 13 Deprivation of liberty applications over an eight month period. The general rate of applications was averaging at 1600 per month.

Complaints were addressed. There were 1,672 complaints made about the Court (excluding ones about the OPG taking combined complaints to 4000). These divided into 25% about judicial decisions, 15% about the cost of proceedings, 15% about administrative errors, and 30% about the length of the process and delays. The rate of complaints reduced in the last 6 months and the Senior Judge credits the Court being integrated into HMCS in April 2009 as having had a positive effect.

Performance indicators were divided into three periods of time. There was an improvement in the proportion of applicants contacted within 20 days of receipt of the application (92%), and of those applications meeting the target for paper directions within 16 weeks (77%) but for those within 20 weeks underperforming by 14%. 59% of applications were heard within 6 weeks, a poor performance the Senior Judge hopes will be improved upon. Replies to correspondence within 10 working days were off target by 20% and down to 75%.

Continuing criticisms The report did not stem criticism. BBC's File on Four, broadcast on 27th of July, focused on new complaints. Parents of disabled children who became 18 had to apply at great expense to be deputies to manage their children's meagre finances and thought their particular situation had been overlooked. A compensation award invested at 0.5% interest instead of 4.5%, the Halifax rate of interest at the time, was bitterly attacked by an accident victim who estimated he had lost £50,000. Another accident victim was awarded £1.5 million and wanted to know the number of hours charged for by her deputy and after 3 months had not been told. The charity Elder Abuse was receiving constant calls to its helpline about fees for unnecessary work and the Court approving too many bills in excess of the £1100 capped rate. Delay in preventing financial abuse was highlighted. The niece of a hospital patient with dementia had taken £300,000 out of P's accounts and conveyed P's home into joint names. It took 3 months to cut off the niece's access to the accounts and no sanctions were taken against her. The Court was attacked for being slow and lenient. The programme concluded that lobbyists like the Court and the public do not.

It is worth remembering the previous Court was also vilified. A Parliamentary Ombudsman Report in 2005 noted poor staff training, high staff turnover, and serious mistakes in managing clients' money. There were poor investments and lost cash leading to compensation claims. Staff often never replied to letters and took months to sort anything out. When complaints mounted up internal memos were written which were "staggering in their arrogance". Overall the Court is trying to improve. It does have a challenging client base and a large volume of work. Some of the delays maybe due to lawyers not using its emergency provisions (see Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection, Pierce and Jackson (Jordans)). It is admitting shortcomings and attempting to adapt quickly. There are now 2,000 applications per month. Previously the four judges based at Archway could not keep up with the volume of work. Although three new judges were appointed in Spring 2010 none of them had sat as judges before their appointment. Meanwhile two experienced Judges will be leaving by spring 2011. It is likely the Senior Judges optimism for future efficiency is misplaced and there will be more delay.

The media have a grievance about removing its right of access, at time when the culture is towards more open justice and will continue with criticism campaigning to get into the hearings. The pressure group Families Against Court of Protection Theft set up by relations who were unhappy with the CoP is also a vocal critic but has a limited ability to solve the problems of others. Website content such as the OPG's pledge to acknowledge a complaint within two working days, unless it does so, will fuel the flames.

It is hoped the new forms, produced with the benefit of the HMCS's drafting experience, will be an improvement on the OPG's previous efforts and will be comprehensible and user friendly. It has been a very bumpy start. The basement interest rates need to be addressed. The tenor of past complaints has been of faceless bureaucrats making incomprehensible decisions, then failing to communicate about them. Focus should be on running an efficient, responsive, problem solving service for the most vulnerable. For many, the Court is still not serving the most vulnerable but adding to their problems.

The Patient
Ann
71

Having emigrated to Spain in March 2008 I just want to feel free, normal & happy. Not overshadowed by the british government. Human again & not repressed. My son would like his dignity restored not to be discriminated against as a relative carer but to be treated with equality and be paid fair like others. My money should not be in pounds but in euros and because of this its value since moving to Spain has devalued by 80,000 Euro. I should not be forced to live off an exchange rate by the British Government. My liberty and freedom of choice should be respected.

I suffer from dysphasia

People with dysphasia may have difficulty talking, understanding "not me", listening "not me", writing "not me" or doing numeral calculations "not me". They may be mildly or severely affected "not me". Everyday tasks, such as shopping or answering the phone "not me", may be impossible.
BUT
People with the condition can

"think clearly and know what they're feeling, and their intellect is maintained."

They're often mistakenly thought to be drunk or mentally confused "not me". Read 2010 The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report on me thats just been delivered and its the second report in 10 years that confirms my capacity. So why am I being treated like a dog by the British Government?
A 4 page report by
Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination.
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001.
Dr Khan from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that is unbelievable as to why they keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
The latest report in November 2011 Read 31 pages

& Mike
The Son Carer & Author-51

Read CV

Michael's RANT!

The carer's work is never done and neither is it paid for!. Discriminated against as a relative carer there is no equality! It's also a 24hr attention span thats needed. I think sometimes, "I'd like to go to the beach for a day but there is'nt enough free time!" We think we'd like a weekend alone visit Morroco or Gibralter but again the tie is there and you can't. When family visit they think they're on holiday so not only are you still waiting on the patient you are also waiting on the family. I sometimes wish they'd say "hey Mike!" we're here you get off for the weekend and enjoy yourselves but "no!".

Treated like hired help but without pay, by your own family is sometimes how it feels. You also feel you have no home, no place of your own and people say well it was your choice but really it were'nt. My mother asked for my care and attention, how could I refuse. My life has been blighted overshadowed, not my own and for what, where is my salary for what I do. Not a wage in sight. Discriminated CARER! Family carer, so you get a benefit that amounts to nothin, but yet outside care can demand £12 an hour. WHY? When a patient is awarded so much money "FOR CARE", why is the family carer not paid his due's. Why is he/she paid a benefit below minimum wage and yet the government allow it to go on.

Whilst fat cat Lawyers, Judges and Courts take their own fat cat fees and wages for their intervention but yet the carer is treated like shit on the end of their shoes! TRUE.

There's something wrong with the system. I calculate for my care over 14 years I am owed £12 per hour for at the very least 14 hours a day 365 days a year 14 years, work that out? £800,000! But if you were just recognised as a working person on minimum wage of £6 that alone would of been £400,000? Whilst other family have built up their worth in property I have not been able to. Its been a mission just trying to work out what I can sell or scrape together each year for an annual holiday but who really gives a shit?

Well I can tell you absolutely no one, accept the people who are in the same boat watching others steal from their relatives estates without transparency, only in secret, accounting to no-one but themselves.

IT HAS TO STOP! The UK government needs to address this with urgency. Someone, somewhere, someday will lose it, mind wise, and someone will die, probably from the pure frustrations that must be building in these people, listened to by no one and I mean no one, or caring about "THE CARERS". Probably because we are a small insignificant minority, but we are gathering strength.

An investigation into a complaint I made on the 4th February 2010 lasted 7 long months, what on earth is going on? I'm sure a murder investigation don't take that long! - Investigation completed the day after I published this statement read the 3 lines Then upon asking for a complete full copy of the investigation passed to legal department whom refused a copy on the grounds of section 40 of the data protection act protecting others.

If I had my time over again knowing what I know now I would have had to refuse my mothers request even though that would of broken my heart. It's took its toll on me over the years but I really blame the UK government for this not my mother whom with all her "so-called" lack of capacity seems to be fully intact to me of which I hold Clinical Neuropsycologists reports to confirm her capacity that have been largely ignored. One day I do believe someone will do something about it and stop this barbarrick inhumane treatment of the people whom CARE the most about the patients.

Back to top

THE MONEY

Damages were awarded for the patients care but its that very standard of care that drops when families become involved because the system is that busy trying to stop famalies having any involvement with the care and money or at least them are the grounds they operate on yet in reality they are protecting their own long term fees whilst under that cover.

The carer whom is caring has no real access and no real say usually because other family whom are protecting their inheritance tend to side with the receivers or courts or worse won't get involved.

There was to my recollection, no money awarded for inheritance and there also was no money awarded for exorbitant fees and charges, so whats gone wrong with the system?

CARE and carers PAY was what the money was awarded for!

In our case one can take note that I personally did the first care of over 5 years before any money was awarded, living off benefits in a 1 bedroomed flat with me sleeping on a sofa! I sometimes think, and my mother the patient also agrees, I should sue her in the courts for back pay. I wonder?

Its ironic when we go out to a restaurant that the patient can order fillet steak but the carer can only afford beans on toast unless the patient issue's a handout. That's how its fealt for me over 15 years just living off handouts, no respect, no dignity, no nothing, treated like dirt when we should be rewarded better than the fat cat lawyers, judges & inheritance hunters etc.

I recently pointed out to the receiver HUGH JONES about the fact there is no wage and he said yes there is its paid in the account and I said its never been pointed out to me its a wage and if it ever was really a wage why has it not been taxed. Fiddling the state out of a tax paid wage I accused him off, with all the cuts that the government are making why are they not stopping carers from claiming benefits when high damages awards have been made to pay for care where that carer can then pay TAX! There has been a constant inbalance in the living standard of the patient to the carer whom as I pointed out that at the time of mums accident in 1995 I was living off an income of £1100 a week from one of my four businesses at that time which was all thrown away in the ensueing disaster in order to prioritise care for mum for free!.

So whats been the point in of it all salvaging the care of one life to ruin your own whilst FAT CAT lawyers and inheritence hunters all get the richer over time. Who is going to take notice of this corrupt system and the discriminatory inequalitys that are blatantly evident today in 2011 for private care damages that were awarded to pay for just that? CARERS! I recently complained to the EHRC The Equality and Human Rights helpline about this very matter and here you read their reply, "The issue that you have regarding care for your mother without payment is not likely to fall within the remit of the Equality Act. It appears that the fact that you are a relative means that you are not entitled to any of the payment award that your mother received to assist with her care.

This is not an equality issue and therefore, we cannot provide any further advice. " Now I ask you? does that not stink of discrimination and where I ask is the equality in that? Its obviously legal in the UK to discriminate against relative carers, no problem at all!

Manchester / Munby Judgement R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE L & ORS : R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE R & ANOR (2001) QBD (Admin) (Munby J) 26/9/2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FAMILY LAW - HUMAN RIGHTS JUDICIAL REVIEW : FOSTER CARERS : RELATIVES : FRIENDS : SHORT TERM : LONG TERM : BOARDING-OUT ALLOWANCE : PAYMENTS : FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION : DEPENDENCY : S.8, S.17, S.22, S.23 AND S.26 CHILDREN ACT 1989 : ACCOMMODATION : PLACEMENTS : RESIDENCE ORDERS : LOOKED AFTER : LOCAL AUTHORITY : FOSTER PLACEMENT (CHILDREN) REGULATIONS 1991 SI 1991/;910 : FINANCIAL REPORTS : FOSTERING ALLOWANCES : NATIONAL FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION : NFCA : FOSTER CARE FINANCE : FCF : CARE PROCEEDINGS : WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS : IRRATIONALITY : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 1950 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : ECHR : ART.8 : RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE : ART.14 : PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION : LEGITIMATE AIMS : PRESSING SOCIAL NEED : PROPORTIONALITY : NECESSITY A local authority’s policy that financially discriminated against foster carers who were related to the children they fostered was unlawful. Two joined applications for judicial review of the respondent council’s policy to pay those short-term foster carers who were friends or relatives of a fostered child at a significantly lower rate than other foster carers. Both applications concerned children who were looked after within the meaning of ss.22 and 23 Children Act 1989. In the first application, the maternal grandparents of three children were the children’s long-term foster carers and the children remained with the grandparents after full care orders were made. In the second application, the children were placed with their older half-sister when full care orders were made after an independent social work assessment. The issue was the legality of the policy. The applicants submitted: (i) the council’s policy was a financial disincentive to family members being foster carers and used their sense of moral obligation to compel them to accept a grossly inadequate level of financial support which was lower than the level determined by the council as necessary for the maintenance of other foster children of like age; (ii) the policy was an attempt to apply financial pressure on family members to move away from local authority support; (iii) the policy was discriminatory within Art.14 European Convention on Human Rights and failed adequately to implement the council’s obligation to promote the right to respect for family life guaranteed by Art.8 of the Convention; (iv) the policy was an attempt to transfer the financial burden of looked-after children away from the council and was an abuse of the council’s dominant position in relation to foster parents and children; and (v) the policy excluded any flexibility to allow payment of the normal fostering allowances to relative foster carers in appropriate cases. HELD: (1) Section 23(2)(a) of the Act left the framework for providing for fostering allowances to the council’s discretion. That discretion had to be: (a) formulated and implemented to allow flexibility according to the needs of the individual children concerned; (b) exercised in light of the aim of the statutory framework without reliance on irrelevant considerations, without disregarding relevant principles, without being perverse and without conflicting with any duties within the framework; and (c) formulated and exercised to safeguard adequately the right to respect for family life in Art.8 of the Convention and to avoid discrimination in breach of Art.14 of the Convention. (2) The applicants’ submissions that imputed less than worthy motives to the council were not accepted. (3) The council’s policy was driven by the principle that it was undesirable to create a financial dependency on it if that would disincline a friend or relative to apply for a s.8 residence order. That was an entirely legitimate consideration and was entirely in accordance with the key principle in s.26(3) of the Act, namely that all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that children were placed with their families as far as possible. (4) The council’s policy was unlawful for four reasons: (i) it imposed an arbitrary and inflexible cash limit on the amounts that could be paid to relative foster carers; (ii) it fixed the level of payments to relative foster carers at such a low level that there was an inevitable a conflict with the welfare principle and the council’s statutory duty; (iii) it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and (iv) it fundamentally discriminated against short-term relative foster carers and the children in their care. None of those objections were met by the legitimacy of the council’s objective. (5) The council’s obligation under both the Act and the Convention was to take all appropriate positive steps to ensure that children should live with their families. Differential treatment based on family relationships or which had an additional impact on family members could only be justified by counterbalancing factors of a compelling nature. If the council’s policy failed when tested against classic public law principles, it inevitably followed that it would fail to pass muster under the Convention. In any event, the policy failed to meet the key Convention tests of necessity and proportionality, thereby breaching Arts.8 and 14 of the Convention. Application allowed. Roger McCarthy QC instructed by Green & Co for the applicants. Ernest Ryder QC and Yvonne Coppel instructed by and for the council. LTL 26/10/2001 : (2002) 1 FLR 43 : (2002) ACD 284 : Times, December 10, 2001 Judgment: Approved subject to editorial corrections - 39 pages Document No.: AC0101975
Reference link
Solicitors link
Full Judgement link

Meet Michael on You Tube
click here

HE WHO CARES, SHOULD WIN, and eventually will! There's a saying in spain, "poco en poco", little by little.

Home is where the heart is and in 2011 this is our home

Thro all the family trauma a new addtion, JACK meets great grandma on 031010. The family get together at a pub for the afternoon was nothing short of a very tense situation.

My sister Angela wants to force her mother back to the UK to live at her house against her mothers consent and after failing to gain her consent and some very derrogatory exchange of texts published here, the following statements were made by the Angela CLAN.

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister Angela and my brother Kevin

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's husband David Platt

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Danielle Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah's, boyfriend Paul Collins

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my brother's wife Tracey Clarke

In defence of the above I and others made the following statements:-

Response 091010 Read A statement made by Michael 6 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend Cheryl Cavanagh 5 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend of 35 years Stephen Power

Response 031010 Read A statement made by ex partner of 6 years Paul Moorby

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years David Owen-Scott

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Jonathon Goulding

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Brenda Swain

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Margaret Davies 3 pages

Out in golfers company for lunch mum wanted to sample some of what the golfers get up to.

.

.

Another brick in the wall

NOV 22 2013 FACEBOOK SELECTION
Michael Clarke
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful.
The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.
The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts.
In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.
Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.
The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.
This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.
Like · · Share · Unfollow Post · 19 November at 14:15
Seen by 8 Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh, Peter Hofschröer and 2 others like this. ..
Tatiana Ladislas von Montegatz Michael Clarke could you please explain if this information could be referred to the Court of Protection and be used? 20 November at 03:58 via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke yes IT can but in practice the courts have an habit of ignoring you as in my case 20 November at 08:18 · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh fraud courts, corrupt system. Corrupt Queen who really don't care about us. More interested in donating money abroad but will watch her own people, elderly, disabled abused in this way and do nothing. 59 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 2 ..
Michael Clarke Absolute agreement on that 57 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh It's about time we had no Queen if she cannot do anything for her country or her people. What is she there for? For us to fund and pay her bills! 56 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke EXACTLY it is... SHE IS a waste of time and money 55 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh So are MPs! what have they done for us victims? We are their constituents! They don't care about us! Waste of our money too! 52 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Also police what they are there for if they can't arrest criminals and can't deal with our cases. We do not need them if the corrupt pay them to not investigate, same with IPCC, Law Society, SRA, Ombudsmen, all waste of taxpeyers money. None do their jobs. A disgraceful country this is! 50 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke MY MP GORDON MARSDEN is a complete waste of space the number of run in s I ve had with him and that was just to get an appointment... he has done nothing he I believe is scared of the corrupt lot and prefers to sweep it under the carpet.... 47 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly same as me with my MP Robert Halfon. The abuse I had from his secretary just to get an appointment. First he was dealing with the case, then went silent, then wouldn't talk to me and I had abuse. He even ran to John Hemming MP to make false stories about me. Even sweep it under the carpet like they all do or more likely bribed by the corrupt! 40 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Whilst MPs are getting second homes, our homes and goods are being stolen. They don't care about us! 38 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke bribed by the corrupt! NOW THAT RINGS TRUE to me in every sense.... as time has gone on and on the more and more corrupt the entire state is uncovered... I've got to the stage where I NOW BELIEVE THERE IS NO JUSTICE ON OFFER. 38 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke there is only the OPTION OF REVOLUTION... 37 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SO I PERSONALLY have joined the anti government protesting and rallies groups associated with bringing down the state as the only option to us... these bastards need to pay the ultimate price for their GREED. 35 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh All victims are having the same problems with their MPs, not just you and me. They do nothing for any of us! How many more victims do we need for them to ever do anything?!! Therefore if our MPs can't do anything for you and me and other of their constituents. What are they there for? 34 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke THEY NEEDING EVICTING OUT OF PARLIAMNET AND THEN OUT OF THEIR OWN HOMES 32 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke THAT IS WHY I USED THE COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST OUR SOLICITORS PANNONES AND HUGH JONES... if it were not worth the paper its written on then why did they spend £70,000 on corrupt bent courts and bent barristers and bent judges to try and stop me with false harassment charges to gain fraudulent injunctions??? 30 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke The judicial system is out of CONTROL just like the identical GOVERNMENT with its BENT banking system built to rob and steal from the poor SLAVES... US! We got to put a stop to it all for the sake of CHILDREN. 27 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly my suffering has paid for corrupt solicitors Amber Melville-Brown, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Lorna Skinner's lovely homes and many more corrupt ...See More 6 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SOMETIME's you have got to fight fire with FIRE so in other words if they condone robbery, theft fraud and violence in the form of coercion to corrupt courts with forced prison, then it is only right fair and equal that this should be matched by equal forces i.e., VIOLENCE! 9 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Agreed it's about time we took corrupt solicitors, judges and police homes and stole all their goods and see if nothing happens to us like them and for Law Society, SRA to see nothing is wrong & concluded at looking at all victims evidence 'they cannot see anything wrong, case closed, file closed on this matter' 3 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke

NOV 22 2013 FOR THE ATTENTION OF RICHARD ALDERMAN IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
. 22 November 2013 at 16:12 Dear Mr. Alderman: The email exchange below is self-explanatory. If you were not aware of ACPO's Memorandum of Understanding with the Law Society, I shall be pleased to provide you with a copy of it. You may find it interesting to follow the internet links provided in the correspondence below. I can also provide you with information on fraud and corruption which has never been investigated by police. One reason for this (besides the agreement with the Law Society) is that, in some cases, police are party to racketeering or cover-ups, and another reason may be that police authorities are not staffed with personnel trained to a high enough standard in forensic accounting to be able to do the job of investigating white collar crime. For example, Greater Manchester Police - the second largest force in the UK - only has one officer trained and experienced enough to investigate white collar fraud. Obviously, serious organized crime affects all UN nations, and the UK is party to a legally binding UN convention to fight corruption. However, perhaps for the above reasons, this is not being done sufficiently, and therefore warrants serious and immediate attention. From what I have experienced, alleged responsiblity for crime, policing and justice in the UK seems to be spread across many ministries and ministers, and also be divided up among police, including ACPO, Sir Paul Stephenson, the Special Crime Unit, and various police authorities. When approached with the very serious matter of organized white collar crime, all parties refuse to investigate or intervene. Most just ignore the public and do not respond at all. I am wondering if the Serious Fraud Office, like the government itself, is dictated to by ACPO, and if it will therefore also refuse to investigate white collar crime and corruption? Referring a complainant back to their own police authority does not work because these authorities have already refused to log complaints of fraud, which is why complainants have attempted to escalate the matters - to no avail. There is absolutely nowhere that a person can go to get police to act. It is not possible to escalate the problem because there is absolutely no accountability by anyone in government. I am aware that an arrest of six solicitors was made recently, but there are many more involved in crimes such as fraudulent land title transfer, insurance fraud, and racketeering through the Court of Protection, and the Office of the Public Guardian, among other things. It is unfortunate that you are answerable to The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve, as he has never responded to these concerns at all. I wonder why the government is organized in such a way. Perhaps it is to spread the responsiblity so widely that nobody can be held accountable. This would seem to me to be the reason for it. The Rt. Hon. Nick Herbert talks about establishing a new Economic Crime Agency, but his department has written to say they will not intervene in individual cases, when they have already been advised of crime and corruption among police, and that nobody will investigate. Nobody can escalate a complaint to anyone as everything goes down a dead end street. There is absolutely no accountability by any public authority in the UK. At least, perhaps with Police Commissioners, someone will exert some authority over police and make them accountable to government and the people. There is a brick wall at every ministry and agency door in the UK, which is why there is now pressure on Europe to intervene. It would seem, from the press, that Europol will be involving themselves in British policing. It is unfortunate, but the country has brought it on itself by not adhering to the UN convention. Her Majesty's government is fragmented and not one person, with the exception of a handful of MPs and Lords shows any concern, or takes any action against the corruption that exists and is fostered among legal professionals, police, and the judiciary.. All are in denial. The Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke has been invited to ask for evidence of judicial corruption, and he does not. I wonder why. I don't know what the purpose of the British Prime Minister is. He should be taking the lead, instead of hobnobbing with media monopoly players. Nobody has any accountability to anyone. No doubt it won't be long before the British join Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Yemen, and the rest, and take to the streets. The British have become a seriously oppressed nation because of all the do-nothings in government. It is no wonder that the government has been buying riot gear for the military. Perhaps they are expecting the Storming of the Bastille. I look forward to receiving your comments, and your request for information on the crimes and corruption. Yours sincerely, Bernard Jenkin, MP Public Administration Committee Westminster, UK Dear Mr Jenkin As you can see from the information following this email, I have been alerting authorities since at least 2011 about the police's fraudulent crime figures. Heaven knows how long others have been alerting them. You will also find reference to police fudging figures in two new books by ex police officer, Stephen Hayes: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fifty-Shades-Black-Blue-revelations-ebook/dp/B00G8OB XD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385045105&sr=8-1&keywords=fifty+shades+of+black+ %27n+blue Jil Matheson is the National Statistician. I believe she has been concerned since I advised her, but nothing has been done by government, with the exception of your own efforts, despite the matter being mentioned in parliament, and despite there also being several newspaper articles about police dereliction of duty since 2011, indicating that police only selectively investigate reported crimes, and most often refuse to record them and issue a crime log number. The financial bonus culture for any public servant makes Britain a laughing stock, but it is worse, when we think that it takes place within police. ACPO is behind all of this nonsense, and is a self-serving old boys' club that should be disbanded. Why on earth would the government not broaden the scope of HM Inspector of Constabularies? Wouldn't that be the most logical move? Obviously, something smells rotten. You should be aware of the fact that many MPs, including those on select committees, are deleting emails from the public, which are respectful and contain intelligence, WITHOUT READING THEM. They are doing it to many, many people, and Ministers are doing it too. It is every bit as serious a corruption problem as police ignoring reports of crime. I know of two people who have tried to report MURDERS and are being ignored by West Yorkshire Police - one of the worst police forces in the country for alleged corruption. They have approached oversight bodies and central government, and are similarly ignored. They have been fighting for justice in the matter for many years. May I emphasise that there are thousands of Britons who have been fighting for justice and police investigations into serious crimes, most notably sophisticated white collar, and yet both police and government ministers ignore them. We have reached the conclusion that police and government are part of the organised crime ring. What other conclusion would a person draw? Something is seriously wrong and, if Mr. Maude is concerned about public servants giving service, he should first examine who is blocking and deleting emails throughout government and public service, and under whose authority they are doing so. The problem of MPs and ministers deleting emails without reading them has been reported to select committees but, unfortunately, several select committee members, including Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, are culprits themselves. The Public Accounts committee has acknowledged the concern but has no intention of doing anything about it, despite the fact that the culprits obviously do not represent good value for money for the British taxpayer. Perhaps we should have drawn this matter to your attention? Actually, I think some of us may have. The situation involving officials ignoring intelligence (particularly about organised crime) from the public is so bad that concerned citizens now broadcast this matter widely to officials in Europe and beyond, because it is corruption, and this corruption belies the fact that the UK is signatory to international conventions against transnational serious organised crime and against corruption. We feel that many MPs and ministers are fraudulently holding office, when they simply either block emails from the public or delete them without reading them, besides which they do nothing about the problems, even after reading the emails. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Clegg obviously couldn't care less, and it will be their undoing. Theresa May is even worse. The people have had enough. Britain is the weak link in international crime fighting. As you know, police had received information from Toronto Police eighteen months ago regarding Operation Spade, and did nothing with it. No arrests were made in the UK. Britain let the team down, as usual. Britain does not deserve to be a G20 or G8 member, and Kenneth Clarke is surely only jokingly be called the "Anti-Corruption Champion", as we have not seen any action from him ever. In fact, he has been part of the problem. As you can see, police also have an agreement NOT TO INVESTIGATE lawyers. It is shocking that this Memorandum of Agreement could ever have been set up. Please keep up the good work. It looks like you are the only one in the UK with any intelligence to realise how police are supporting serious transnational organised crime by their failure to record and investigate reports. I should also point out that many victims have presented their cases in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and yet nobody has taken any action to help them. This can only be due to institutionalised corruption on a grand scale and, until some action is taken to help these people, then we will continue to believe this. Yours sincerely, ATTENTION: MS. JIL MATHESON - REGARDING INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CRIME STATISTICS Ms. Jil Matheson UK Statistics Authority Statistics House Tredegar Park Newport South Wales NP10 8XG Dear Ms. Matheson: I was interested to read in the newspaper that you will be working with ACPO and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary on an independent review of national crime statistics. You may be interested to know that, as a result of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between ACPO and the Law Society, white collar crimes involving members of the legal profession are never logged or investigated by police. As you can see, the Memorandum of Understanding is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice. National crime statistics, therefore, can never be accurate; they never were, and never will be, unless police start recording incidents. This state of affairs is a national shame. As a result, I understand that Europe is about to step in and do Britain's policing for them. http://www.dailyexpress.co.uk/posts/view/224895/EU-bureaucrats-win-power-to- probe-UK-crime Police have openly refused, and continue to refuse, to investigage fraud, perjury or forgery, if a legal professional is involved, telling the general public that it is a civil matter. If you have a moment to watch this video, you will hear a policeman telling the gentleman that fraud is a civil matter. This is standard practice. Complaints from the public are simply ignored. No action is taken, not even a report. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg Of course, fraud. perjury and forgery are crimes the world over, except if they take place in the UK and involve a legal professional. One must remember that most complex white collar crime involves a legal professional......and yet it goes unreported because police will not log the crimes, much less investigate them. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of victims of white collar crime up and down the country, whose cases have never been logged or investigated by police. Personally, I can attest to the fact that Lancashire police have refused me, nine times to date, a log or incident number, so that I may report a crime. The refusal includes a member of the Professional Standards Branch. Not one officer has ever asked me what crime I wish to report. It could be a murder; it could be anything. However, I believe that they are afraid because I have knowledge of corruption in that constabulary, which is why they refuse to take my report. I will gladly supply the details to anyone who might feel it is their duty to act. The Home Office has already said that they don't want to involve themselves, so I can only think that, as Mr. Cameron doesn't show any interest either, nobody in the UK cares. So crimes in the UK are going unreported and uninvestigated; therefore, your statistics will always be flawed. Your review is a complete waste of government money and effort because, as long as ACPO continues to run the country with its corrupt hidden agenda, and its Memorandae of Understanding with whomever it sees fit, reports will be a complete sham. You don't have, and will never have, true statistics. Crimes committed by the police are never logged, and there are many cases of police harrassment and brutality, such as that of South Wales Police continually harrassing Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Lancashire Constabulary continually harrassing Ms. Carol Woods - no log numbers for either issues - just police harrassment in a very serious and ongoing manner, including imprisonment without due process, and attempts to section these individuals under the Mental Health Act. I would be delighted to supply information so that the government might investigate, but it appears that it does not feel it has any authority over ACPO. It seems that ACPO runs the whole country, including the Home Office, which seems to condones everything they do, and which says it has no authority to invervene in any matters whatsoever. I always thought the Prime Minister would have some power if he should choose to use it. Baroness Neville-Jones offers no apology for the attached Memorandum of Understanding, and simply stated, while addressing the House of Commons, that the Memorandum of Understanding was decommissioned in 2007. It most certainly was not, as you can see from the video. What's more, it should never have existed in the first place, as it is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice, and ACPO has been doing so for a long time, and still continue to do so. That, coupled with the outright refusal by police in every single authority to write up incident reports and issue log numbers, is a culpable offence for police officers in most other country except corrupt Britain. It is corruption not to allow people to report crimes. Perhaps this matter should be taken to higher authorities before you waste your time? It seems like someone has already told Europe about it. If I can offer any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me by email or phone. Yours sincerelyDear xxxxxx Thank you for your e-mail to Jil Matheson. I will pass to colleagues working on the review of crime statistics and we will respond properly as soon as we are able. Kind regards Alex Elton-Wall Private Secretary National Statistician's Office UK Statistics Authority Tel: 01633 455306 Mob: 07795 800089 E-mail: alex.elton-wall@statistics.gsi.gov.uk

Back to top