READ a 1 page brief synopsis & 4 page SUBMISSION to the LORDS
or 5page overview. Take me to the NUTS & BOLTS OF EVIDENCE
Or here you can listen to the LINK of 1 hour radio interview 11/4/2014
Welcome to the website that is working to expose the property/financial rape/cleansing of the elderly/vulnerable "whom hold capacity" and whom are being "forced" into care homes against their will by government/judiciary agents whom want to steal & plunder their assets/cash!
These Websites published under the protection of the Human Rights Act 1998 Article10(1) READ+ THE BILL OF RIGHTS/1ST AMENDMENT

LIVE DIARY UPDATES with website:
& >> -
2010 to 2012 .. Read 2013 .. Read 2014 .. Read 2015 - track
RELEASE my house & £20 million CLAIM - STONEWALLED

OCTOBER 8 2015 [622908]visits.
PETER JACKSON JUDGE who restricted the sale via LAND REGISTER via his clerk ALEXANDRA MORTON
JOANNE EARLEY, MANAGER of COURT of PROTECTION whom is STONEWALLING the application to lift the order via TRACEY INVERARY ref 10370284 dob 09081940 ann:clarke
MP GORDON MARSDEN whom has been fully informed of the gross miscarriages of JUSTICE.
DAILY MAIL whom are documenting FRAUD emanating from the court of protection.
FORWARDED by recorded delivery also to MP MICHAEL GOVE Sec of STATE for JUSTICE.
LEN LAWRENCE, [ex pilot] who also is a victim of COP FRAUD documenting it by writing a BOOK.
From: Sue Clarke []
Sent: 07 October 2015 18:24
To: Mike Clarke
Subject: 31 Cherry Tree Road
Dear Mr Clarke
With regards to the above property, we have had it brought to our attention by Ms Angela Wild (your SISTER) the property may not be sold due to a charge applied by the Court of Protection.
Unfortunately without relevant permission from the Court of Protection we have had to suspend marketing the property for the time being.
Could you please provide us with confirmation from the Court of Protection that the property can be sold and we can the resume marketing.
Kind regards
Sue Clarke Sales Manager
McDonalds 29 White Gate Drive Blackpool FY3 9AA
01253 398498 01253 309032 Direct Dial
Dear Sue Clarke
Thank you for your email. Firstly I want to point out about the restriction on the land register, an application has been received by the COURT on the 2nd Sept 2015 to LIFT that restriction as it is considered VOID.
The very same JUDGE whom placed that restriction had no need to do so and we await a removal of such a restriction and here below is a copy of an email exchange with that very JUDGE who has also been copied in to this email.
SEPTEMBER 23 2015 [622521]visits.
Here below is the very email from JUDGE JACKSON From: Morton, Alexandra [] JUDGE JACKSONS CLERK Sent: 30 July 2014 22:47 To: Mike Clarke Subject: RE: FAO PETER JACKSON Dear Mr Clarke,
The judge has seen your message below. He replies that an application of this kind cannot be dealt with informally. If you wish to vary the order, you must make an application to the Court of Protection in proper form, accompanied by the order that you attach, and serve it upon the other interested parties. The court will then give directions for the application to be considered. Regards
Alexandra Morton
Clerk to Mr Justice Peter Jackson
Family Division Liaison Judge for the Northern Circuit
The application to the court was served by recorded delivery on the 2nd SEPTEMBER 2015. Documented here
I can however confirm 2 things; UNDER THE instruction of the VERY SAME Judge whom made an order stating my mother had capacity to make a WILL We attach here that very same will that was made, that also incorporates the JUDGES ORDER
YOU need to take full notes of the LIVING WILL that was made where in that you will see that my mother, STATE’s; ANYONE further claiming any incapacity, her SON Me, steps in as her LIVING WILL executor.
The court are fully aware of this, and that this, places my authority as EXECUTOR over theirs, perhaps you may wish to check legalities??
Having demonstrated my authority, respectfully you may continue to market this property, whilst awaiting the courts removal of their restriction which is imminent.
You will appreciate having read my mother’s living WILL that my SISTER, ‘ANGELA WILD’ has no authority what-so-ever, to intervene or attempt to delay any such marketing.
YOU may of course confirm with courts if you wish DIRECTLY, that indeed they do have an application and that there is no problem in marketing the property. WE would however, like to be kept notified of your correspondence with any other party.
Regards Mike & Ann Clarke

OCTOBER 6 2015 [622841]visits.

The Official Solicitorand the court of protection by Andy Peacher on Mixcloud

OCTOBER 4 2015 [622790]visits.

Of processing court applications to stop delay obfuscate and prevent Justice being obtained in order for the CARTEL of CRIMINALS to continue their FRAUDS on the public issuing such claims as 'WITHOUT MERIT' & 'NO RIGHT of AUDIENCE'. Listen in TONIGHT @ 7pm UK time we take to the radio to expose the fraudulent courts STONEWALLING of our application to lift a court order from mums house so she can sell it & with damages claimed in excess of £20 million via Commercial liens served upon Judges.. Prime Minister Chief of Police MP Gordon Marsden & Sec of State for Justice Michael Gove. FULL SHOW here

OCTOBER 3 2015 [622769]visits.
A debt that has been created by fraud, eminating from UK courts, backed by BENT JEWdiciary, all colluding and conspiring in their USER GROUP MEETINGS[next user meeting 7th OCT 15] on how to further corrupt, not fit for purpose statute acts, to suit their racketeering enterprise of very lucrative 'NO RIGHT OF AUDIENCE' monopolised club that 'WITHOUT MERIT' carrys on its financial RAPE of those, not yet, better educated.

OCTOBER 2 2015 [622760]visits.

Current intensive care health bill £1655... £955 borrowed and paid £700 outstanding with letter of understanding guarantee signed by me to pay in one week when she returns for further blood tests. Will speak further to friends as relatives refused to pay one penny and in fact said "send the bill to the COURT OF PROTECTION".. not such a bad idea! video to be released soon.

OCTOBER 1st 2015 [622696]visits.

30 days ago today we sent in to the Court of Protection an URGENT application, here for;
1. The removal of the court order restricting the sale of mums property.
2. The claim of damages for £20 million pounds compensation.
WHY.... YOU ASK??? they are trying to work out how to continue to SWEEP this under the carpet into damage limitation as they have for the past 12 years and keep a lid on the PERPETUAL FRAUDS & RACKETEERING they operate from within this family court.
Now... my sister Angie wants to take mum back to UK against her will, with my consent, but mum has said NO she wants to stay with me in Thailand, where. .. and when the corrupt court of protection decide to release her house, to be sold & she can have her own carers in her own home with her own money so Angie, here is the video evidence of her being asked that question...
STRANGE as it seems when the estranged brother and sister were asked to contribute to medical expenses of the BANGKOK hospital they said, "we will not be sending one penny" BUT now she can find return flights to THAILAND with a one way return for mum and I also presume settlement of the hospital bill in excess of £1200 so thats a sum total of approx £2500?? what wrong with just respecting mums wishes and assisting where required??
BEATS ME??.. why would you NOT respect your own mothers wishes?

SO WHY DID WE MOVE TO THAILAND again mum wants to live in peace with her choices respected as to where she lives and whom she lives with.... seem reasonable does it? to anyone normal.... of course where there's money or assets their are vultures and they are clearly seen here .. because the court being the ultimate vulture has their sights SET on mums property. THEY have already swindled her out of and in excess of £250,000 pounds and her carer SON been fraudulently placed upon him a prison sentence by a COURT OF PROTECTION so called Judge [PELLING] for so called contempt and harrasment!
NOW the deepening saga and exposure of this court of unfettered unaccountable powers can be seen in the case of PETER HOFSCHROER whose mother he was looking after in the so called safety of EUROPE ie AUSTRIA had his conspiring brother who worked in social services in YORK come to AUSTRIA and with the conspiracy and help of AUSTRIAN police arrested Peter on false charges temporary whilst they abducted/kidnapped Peters mother out of Austria.
IS EUROPE safe from the UK persecution of a corrupt court... DEFINATELY NOT.
EQUALLY the remaining asset providing funds can go 3 times further in a country like THAILAND were private carers cost £40 weekly as opposed to £400 - £500 in UK terms.
Additional we would be in peace from persecution along a whole host of other reasons.

SEPTEMBER 30 2015 [622633]visits.
When are the Court of Protection going to process her claim to release her house that is on the market for sale or are they just going to ignore her as they have for the past month where ALL September they have not, WILL NOT process her application??? HER ASSET frozen effectively by a FRAUDULENT COURT trying to force things upon her that her doctors report & state they need not. WHAT agenda other than theft has the UK got on elderly ASSETS that they seek to GAIN by unlawful, devious and unscupulous means jeopordising the lives of their own subjects whom stand in their way.
We seek donations to her hospital costs due to court of protection thefts being left unnaccounted and sanctioned by bent judiciary.

SEPTEMBER 28 2015 [622614]visits.

Reported on the 25th Oct 2009 and still no change!

SEPTEMBER 28 2015 [622602]visits.

We are numbered many, we cannot all be wrong... there is serious FRAUD going on in the Court of Protection and courts in general listen to this 2 hour radio show where we are mentioned on 5 different occasions along with Peter Hofschroer, Norman Scarth and a whole host of others being silenced by EITHER the mental capacity ACT or PRISON? YOU WILL BE SHOCKED.
The Court of Protection handles some 3 billion pounds worth of assets belonging to vulnerable persons. This is deposited into the Bank of England (known for enabling money laundering), earning only 0.5% interest for the owners. It has been suggested that these deposits are held in a Treasury account to offset the national debt. There are virtually no checks and balances.
Next Sunday 4th OCT 2015 at 3pm Mike Clarke takes to the radio air waves to EXPOSE... Mental Health Fraud and Abuse By The Court of Protection... via Andy Peachers Blog talk radio.

SEPTEMBER 27 2015 [622597]visits.

This is what was said last:
Minutes of Court User Group Meeting Wednesday 1 April 2015 2.00pm
Queens Building – Conference Room
Terms of Reference
The purpose of the Court User Group is to provide a forum for discussion for matters causing concern for Court Users and views and comments on policy issues.
Thes minutes may be widely disseminated.
Senior Judge Lush (Court of Protection) – Chair (SJL) District Judge Batten (Court of Protection) District Judge Mort (Court of Protection) District Judge Jackson (Court of Protection) Lorna Green (Delivery Manager Court of Protection) Heather Feast (Delivery Manager Court of Protection) James Batey (Authorised Court Officer Court of Protection) (JB) Gillian Jurd (Technical Advisor Court of Protection) Joan Goulbourn (MoJ Policy) Emma Petty (MoJ Policy) Sally Jones (OPG) Paul Tregoning (OPG) Janey Ilett (Solicitor OSPT) Elaine Brown (Solicitor OSPT) Sunil Teeluck ( Solicitor – OPG) David O’Shea (CFO) David Sinclair (Solicitors for the Elderly) Julia Lomas (Solicitor – Irwin Mitchell) Lynne Coombes (Deputy Bond Services) Lorraine Cavanagh (COPPA) Anselm Benedict (Policy Advisor – Family & Social Justice – The Law Society) Sophy Miles (Solicitor – Miles & Partners) George Hodgson (STEP) David Rees (Barrister- 5 Stone Buildings) Hugh Jones (Solicitor – Hugh Jones solicitors) Nicola Macintosh (Solicitor – Macintosh Law) Christine Bunting ( Solicitor – Thrings) Martin Terrell ( Solicitor – Thomson Snell & Passmore) Caroline Bielanska ( Solicitor – Legal Consultant) Alexander Elphinston (Solicitor – Anthony Collins) Paul Greatorex (Barrister – 11kbw) Kate Edwards (Solicitor Fentons) Lucy Bonnerjea (Dept of Health) Karon Walton (Solicitor – Tollers) Helen Starkie (Solicitor ) Jon Martin (SCCO) Janet Lee (APAD - London Borough of Camden) Anura Ali (Solicitor – London Borough of Islington) Shadia Ousta-Doerfel (Islington Borough Council) Lynne Coombes (Deputy Bond Services) Alison Taylor (Frenkel Topping) Sean Smith (STEP) John Fraser (Marsh) Apologies
Joanne Earley (Court Manager – Court of Protection)
Liz Eaton (MoJ Policy)
Elizabeth Jeary (CFO)
Andrew Harding (Solicitor - Hugh James) Fiona MacGillivray (Solicitor – Family Action)
Duncan Boulton (Lay Deputy)
Stephen Pigott (SCCO)
Eddie Fardell (Solicitor - Thomson Snell & Passmore)
John Fraser (Marsh)
Previous Minutes
These were read and agreed.
Matters arising
There were no matters arising.
Court Management Report
Lorna Green introduced herself as one of the two Performance Delivery Managers and passed on the apologies of Joanne Earley, who has been appointed as the new Operational Manager for the court, but who was on annual leave.
Since our transfer to First Avenue House we have undergone a number of changes in both senior management structure and procedures. Kate Briden is now the Director of the RCJ and Court of Protection
We have recruited a volume of new administrative staff who are still undergoing training and development. We are also reviewing our processes with the aim of improving the service we deliver as we recognise we have room for improvement.
Current position
Applications are currently being issued within 5 days of receipt.
Deputyship orders are now being drafted on the day the statutory waiting period expired.
Outcome of deputy orders are being communicated within 5 days.
We acknowledge that we do have a high volume of work awaiting Judicial consideration which is currently just over 2000 cases dating back to 10 February 2015. We have recruited a new Authorised Officer who is now assisting in making inroads into the current arrears and have a new District Judge scheduled to join us in July 2015. It is therefore anticipated that by the end of the summer we will be back within the 5 day target within this area of work.
There have been many changes affecting the court and a number of these will be discussed in more detail today by both Emma Petty and Joan Goulbourn. However the main changes can be summarised as follows –
Implications of Cheshire West (Re X cases)
At the last meeting you were updated on the potential implications of the above case. Since then we have set up a team dedicated to dealing with this type of work and the intention is to ring fence work of this type upon receipt so that it does not impact on the other work of the Court. We have nominated over 100 judges from the Social Entitlement Chamber to handle this work.
Although initial volumes have been lower than anticipated we have seen an increase to 34 in March.
Payment by account
The PBA system was implemented in November 2014 as an alternative way of paying the application fee and is now embedded. Currently over 1100 court users have signed up for this system and have positively fed back. It is anticipated that frequent court users will benefit from signing up to this process which is particularly suited to Local Authority and Professional deputy applications. We will ensure that further details are forwarded to you with the minutes of this meeting.
Changes to the Fee Remission form for COP Cases
We have been reviewing the issues associated with the change in process and taken on board feedback from court users. We are working closely with both the HMCTS policy and digitalisation teams to improve the application form and now have confirmation that a separate COP remission application form will be implemented to recognise that court users in COP applications need to complete the form with different details from other HMCTS court users. We do not currently have a go live date for this.
Changes to Bonding of Professional deputies
We have been working closely with Deputy Bond Service to improve the process and turn around of bonded orders where professional deputies have been appointed which has resulted in the same day dispatch of final orders in many cases.
New IT system
We are working with the OPG to create a new IT system for both COP and OPG. The Go Live Date has not been set but it is envisaged that this new system will assist the Court with Case progression and may enable the scanning of applications upon receipt to work towards paperless working. We will keep you updated on the progress of this project.
With over 2000 cases received per month work has been undertaken to increase the throughput of contentious matters.
The number of ticketed COP Judges has increased, which in turn has seen an increase in the transfer of work to regional judges .
To continue this work and ensure that CoP cases, in particular Welfare applications are dealt with efficiently, a standard way of administering and hearing work across the Regions will be implemented through the creation of Regional Hubs. Emma Petty will give more details Website
One main recommendations from the House of Lords Select Committee was that the court has its own website . We are working on improving the existing pages we have on GOV.UK and I have a handout for you from Ross Hamiliton with proposed changes for your comments.
From July 2015 there will be a change in some of our fees. The new court fees will be implemented. Joan Goulbourn will give you more information on this and also be updating you on rule changes to be implemented 6th April and 1st July 2015.
Rule changes
•Reduction in the Notice period for service, notification and responding to service from 21 to 14 days •Removal of the requirement for separate permission application to streamline the handling of Personal Welfare applications.
The rule changes give us opportunity to implement the new forms we have been reviewing. The new forms will reduce some of the length and duplication contained in the current forms and will ensure that the information contained within the application is relevant to the particular type of application made. More information will be provided in the foreseeable future.
We recognise that the court still has some room for improvement and value court user feedback in assisting us in identifying where we need to next concentrate our efforts to improve the service we deliver
Lorraine Cavanagh asked if a draft could be emailed to be proof read, to avoid problems with spelling mistakes. (SJL) said that there was a problem if these were not immediately dealt with, as they can then build up. (JB) said that the easiest solution would be for the orders to be dispatched without any errors and that figures were kept to identify training needs.
Several people complained about delays in the dispatch of orders made in the regions. Janet Ilett said this caused particular problems when the Official Solicitor needed to instruct experts. It particularly highlighted differences between the various regions – she agreed that those orders made in the London court were generally received promptly.
Heather Feast, the Delivery Manager for that area, said she would look into this, but that the forthcoming regional hubs would hopefully reduce this issue.
Update on Rules Group
Joan Goulbourn (JG) said that the there was a Statutory Instrument for first tranche of the proposed Rule changes and new Practice Directions would be published on 6 April.
The second tranche was awaited but the forthcoming election and potential change of Government may cause delays.
Changes to Court Fees
(JG) explained that the Statutory Instrument for changes to the Court fees had also been drafted but was awaiting the new Minister to be signed off.
There would be two rates for applications – £220 and £410 – and a new fee of £50 for COP9 applications. The present exemption for fees in respect of EPA and LPA objections would be removed and the Hearing fee would be raised at the listing stage.
Various concerns were raised, but it was explained that there would be exemptions, details of which would be available when the fees were signed off.
Update on House of Lords Select Committee
(JG) explained that there had been a debate in the House of Lords on 10 March
and the evidence given to the Committee is available on the following website:
The work is continuing and steps are being taken to raise awareness via the “Choice not Chance” campaign.
Independent oversight is to be via an advisory National Mental Capacity Forum, an advertisement for the Chair of which would be circulated after the meeting for anyone who may be interested. The general membership of the Forum had not yet been decided.
Update on Essex Autonomy Report on achieving CRPD compliance
(JG) said that the UK had been due to be inspected last September, then in April, but it had again been postponed.
In the meantime, the MoJ was looking at the question of compliance and was having workshops with the Essex Autonomy Project. It was intended to follow the recommendations of HHJ Hazel Marshall Q.C. unless these were over ridden.
The ratification of the Hague Convention was a matter for the Minister, but again was awaiting the outcome of the election. There was a discussion about the implications of this, particularly the change of definition of capacity and substituted decision making.
(SJL) said that changes in mental capacity legislation tended to arise every 25 years and it was 20 years since the start of the review that led to the Mental Capacity Act, so a review was likely to be due in about 5 years.
Update on fixed costs
Unfortunately Master Haworth was unable to attend the meeting, but Joan Goulbourn explained that hopefully this question would be resolved by June. The last time fixed costs were set was in February 2011. (SJL) said that previously these had been agreed with the Law Society based on the Retail Prices Index.
The Costs Office was looking at the Practice Directions and the OPG was considering solicitors’ costs as part of the supervisory review.
Update on Fundamental Review of Supervision of Deputies
Paul Tregoning explained that the OPG had reviewed the organisation last year and now had three specialist teams, supervising Local Authority, lay and panel deputies. The intention was to build up relationships and expertise.
The three types of supervision had also been removed, with each case being considered individually to assess risk.
The office was trying to introduce a culture change, with the review of the guidance, and early contact, especially for lay deputies, to provide a “settling in” call. All staff were being given “tone of voice“ training.
In the next few months there was to be liaison with stakeholders to establish standards.
It was also intended to do “assurance visits” in respect of Local Authority or professional deputies who manage several cases. Two or three cases would be selected and visited in detail.
There was some discussion about these interviews, with concerns raised that the interviewers did not understand the role of professional deputies, particularly those managing younger, brain injury and damages cases.
It was also intended that each case would have an “asset inventory” within 3 to 4 months of the start of the case, so that there was a clear idea of the value of the estate and what is planned.
At 3.30pm the meeting had to be curtailed as the RCJ was evacuated due to smoke and the loss of power following a serious fire in Kingsway.
Date of next meeting
2.00 Wednesday 7 October 2015 at Queens Building, Royal Courts of Justice.

SEPTEMBER 25 2015 [622571]visits.

The FAR EAST now being the permanent choice of retirement after waiting tirelessly for some UK JUSTICE... we have seen the light, that there is NO JUSTICE currently eminating from the UK.
It is therefore now more than ever the correct time to make this PUBLIC, on the basis that a person rights to choice must be respected, of which the UK government continues unlawfully to disrespect, my mothers human rights choices.
AS a result of such breaches, they are now jeopardising her well being on health grounds, where they are denying her the right to sell her property, for the safety of another country from their persecution of her, that we have seen the long arm of corruption can extend into EUROPE, and as in the case of Peter Hofschroer, can kidnap his mother from Austria aided by Austrian POLICE.
EUROPE is indeed unsafe for us to reside in and now by moving out of EUROPE where we feel more SAFE, the compromise is health care and the cost of it! THEREFORE it is with heavy decision making that to secure mums potential for health care treatment she must have ready access to her funds by the SELLING of HER UK property to secure financially potential treament that IS of now URGENT.
It would also be important to note also that her quality of life in terms of property should not be diminished either, which it has by persecution, and so needs suitable accomodation URGENT.
WHILST Court of protection corruption continues unabated protecting those criminals running it, my mothers life shortens by each day and the minutes tick by uncomfortably for her.
My mother whom has a meager pension but took £48 from it to print in colour and send recorded delivery 200 pages of material relating to our persecution that is required placing onto RECORD, a COURT OF RECORD, with a JURY.
THE CRIMINAL JUDGES need to bear ALL the BURDENS they have placed upon US to help protect future victims from ABUSE OF PROCESS.
The refusal of the court to process her application just about sums up in total the entire corrupt CESSPIT of the COURT OF PROTECTION that is not fit for purpose until they deal with their own misgivings and refund in damages what is due to the vulnerable that they have stole off.

SEPTEMBER 24 2015 [622544]visits.
This house

the court of protection, whom are facilitating crimes of FRAUD, are preventing the sale of. LET it be known that the corrupt authorities behind this act stem right to the very TOP and anybody exposing their corruption will be incarcerated in prison as they tried with me in order to remove any obstacle in their way to get at the remaining ASSET.
THIS asset they have devalued by some £50,000 by their actions of FRAUD THEFT AND MAL ADMINISTRATION & PERSECUTION of Mrs Clarke & her son into EXILE as refugees.
The court previously tried to force a sale of this house which we fought and won... then after further persecution of mike and his mum into exile as refugees we now need to sell and they now are preventing it ... ask yourselves WHY??

SEPTEMBER 24 2015 [622538]visits.
Dear Tracey Inverary & N HOLMAN
My mother out of her pension paid £48 to send to you 200 HARD COPY pages of application material for her urgent application.
Within that was:-
Her case no
Her ex 160 fee remission form
IF you took care in reading it you may be enlightened as to your email questions?? DESIGNED TO OBFUSCATE
WHAT YOU are doing is in actual fact PREVENTING the sale of her property!!!
A property currently on the market taking viewings and enquires that will provide a better quality of life of which it was intended.
Currently we live in a one bedroomed RENTED apartment ABROAD where mother has to use the pull down sofa bed in the lounge, lacking dignity amongst a whole host of other matters I need not bore you with.
URGENT is the root core of the APPLICATION.
YOUR wilful refusal to cooperate is being recorded and may be used against you.
Regards mike & ann: clarke

SEPTEMBER 23 2015 [622530]visits.

SEPTEMBER 23 2015 [622521]visits.
Here below is the very email from JUDGE JACKSON
From: Morton, Alexandra [] JUDGE JACKSONS CLERK
Sent: 30 July 2014 22:47
To: Mike Clarke
Dear Mr Clarke,
The judge has seen your message below. He replies that an application of this kind cannot be dealt with informally. If you wish to vary the order, you must make an application to the Court of Protection in proper form, accompanied by the order that you attach, and serve it upon the other interested parties. The court will then give directions for the application to be considered.
Alexandra Morton
Clerk to Mr Justice Peter Jackson
Family Division Liaison Judge for the Northern Circuit
From: Mike Clarke []
Sent: 30 July 2014 13:16
To: Morton, Alexandra
FAO Judge Jackson at his request in his order below or attached
Dear Alexandra
link to the order or as attached
On the 9th October 2012 Peter Jackson placed an order on my mothers property that it could not be sold in her lifetime.
My mother could not enjoy the comfort of her own home as we are in exile from further corruption committed by COP JUDICIARY.
My mother requires to sell or exchange her property for another abroad.
What process does she now have to follow to have this order removed because Mr JACKSON in section 37 of the order above clearly states that he reserves the right of any further application in this matter.
We believe the order was void in the first instance because Peter Jackson authorised my mother to make a will in which she made a living will that made me her son the living will executor if anyone further claimed she was incapacitated that Peter Jackson was fully aware of before placing his order upon her property.
Mr Jackson also within this order states implicitly that my mothers will had all the hallmarks of being written by me in which it was NOT, clear advice was taken from another whom did advice on the will to be drafted to suit my mother's wishes that I might add have been the same wishes for 11 long years prior to the making of this will and that Mr JACKSON claimed in his order she had the capacity to make!
Having been in exile since January 13th 2013 for 1 year and a half and no justice in sight to resolve matters it is now clear to my mother that the UK is corrupt and we can no longer return to live there.
The house has been empty during this time and is becoming damp and needs repairs and so is currently devalued, it is for this reason before the onset of another winter my mother requires matters resolving.
It is with some urgency now that she requires the order lifting from her property in order to sell or exchange it for something where she can enjoy the benefit of her living in peace.
Mike & Ann Clarke [cop ref 10370284]

SEPTEMBER 23 2015 [622517]visits.
Dear Mike Clarke,
Thank you for your email.
The Court can only make a decision when an application is made not through publishing of responses to outside parties. Court procedure has to be followed. The system does not show a formal application made to the court, thus, there is no matter to be considered as urgent. The order you attached was made in 2012 as a result of attended hearing(s), after which the matter has been closed. The order was also made by a Regional Judge, not a Judge that sits in the Court Of Protection in London. If an application is made this would have to be referred to the Honourable Peter Jackson to make a decision (according to the Order).
When you addressed your email to the Court Enquiry Service you did not provide the case number or indicate clearly the full name of the Client/Patient and date of birth so that Court staff are able to provide the necessary information in line with the query made.
I do hope this is sufficient.
Please note Court Staff cannot instruct nor provide legal advice.
Tracey Inverary
Copied to JACKSON
Dear Tracey Inverary
Having previously contacted JUDGE JACKSON direct his email indicated that this had to be dealt with formally by an application to the Court of Protection that would then refer it to him… so tell me again… why are you not referring it to him???
Again this correspondence HAS been published.
Mike Clarke

SEPTEMBER 22 2015 [622501]visits.
Dear Mr N Holman & Tracey Inverary
I have published your response to our URGENT APPLICATION.
I would ask.. what is it that you do not understand? Regarding the 1st few lines of the application attachment?
Ie Ref 10370284 ann clarke
If the court does not have the mental capacity to take on board what it has done & you wish to deal with one thing at a time then this is fine.
Your JUDGE JACKSON did place an order on my mother s property to prevent its sale during her life time. THIS ORDER is required to be removed in order to sell the property or be free to exchange for property ABROAD where she now is.
The order referred to is attached here.
The land register is also attached that is out of date as no receiver exists here.
I also attach mums will THAT makes provision for a LIVING WILL executor should any further claim of incapacity appear here.
My mother’s application is such that she is outside the jurisdiction of ENGLAND & WALES and will remain so.
My mother is ageing and requires better provision for that and therefore requires URGENT removal of the said order restricting the sale.
The 2nd part of the application can be dealt with at a later stage if the courts mental capacity is so diminished that it will delay the removal of the order from her home which is the URGENT matter!
mike & ann: clarke

SEPTEMBER 22 2015 [622500]visits.
Good Morning
I am sorry but it is not clear who is the application for or the nature of the application. Hopefully you can let us know, so that we can attend to your request.
Mr N Holman
Court Enquiries Service | Court of Protection | PO Box 70185, First Avenue House, | 42 - 49 High Holborn | London WC1A 9JA DX: 160013 | KINGSWAY 7 Telephone: 0300 456 4600

Dear Mike Clarke,
Thank you for your email. I apologise on behalf of the Court for any inconvenience you have experienced. It is not clear to whom the application relates. It is also not clear what type of application you made. Any application made to the Court should normally be made on a COP1 with a fee £400. Please note it can take 2-3 weeks before the application is placed on the system and an acknowledgement letter is sent out. You may need to wait further for a letter from the Court.
I do hope this is sufficient.
Please note Court Staff cannot instruct nor provide legal advice. Please forward any additional emails to our email address. Kind Regards, Tracey Inverary l Court Enquiry Service

From: Mike Clarke []
Sent: 10 September 2015 13:35
To: Court of Protection Enquiries; Conway, Andrew
Subject: TEAM G1 contact email required
TEAM G1 contact email required

Dear Sirs
I have now written several times without response.
I am the EXECUTOR of the ALL CAPS estates;
I have submitted an urgent application by recorded delivery on the 1st SEPT 15 to G1
I have not received any confirmation but yet have a delivery receipt signature confirmation from ROYAL MAIL on the 2nd Sept 15
Now on the 10th September 15 I require direct email contact with G1
mike: clarke
ann: clarke

SEPTEMBER 20 2015 [622450]visits.

This letter arrived by email from GORDON MARSDEN in response to the COMMERCIAL LIEN he is now attached to for a joint and severally liable sum of £20 million pounds damages claim.
Mr Marsden claims he knew nothing of the correspondence sent to him. I have now sent by return of his email a copy 18 emails LETTERS and FAXES that never bounced back to me and or any acknowledgements to the fax or letters.
ONE of those being a direct email to the email his secratary has just sent.. a GILL TOMLINSON.
YOU can also see how Mr MARSDEN is trying to shift responsibilty by now claiming we are not his constituents because of what he claims is our choice to move country/address when if he read the 200 page documentation contained within the LIEN served upon him he would realise we are forced refugees from parliamentary corruption facilitated by the JEWdiciary.
Need I say more on this!
I will however follow up on the corresponndence sent to MR MARSDEN here with a TOTAL of 18 emails FAXES and Letters for all to see and I also will be forwarding to his LABOUR PARTY office.
BEFORE Mr Marsden digs a hole any further that he cannot climb out of I write this section in RED... and that several of these emails I have automated responses from his office acknowledging receipts!

SEPTEMBER 17 2015 [622400]visits.
DEAN CLIFFORD talks about assumptions/presumptions

SEPTEMBER 15 2015 [622372]visits.
Having filed an urgent application on the 1st Spetember 2015 and by recorded delivery signed for on the 2nd Sept 15, the man mike clarke and his mother ann have failed to receive even an acknowledgement!
We also wrote repeated emails to the court of protection customer services and to a ANDREW CONWAY whom both also have failed to respond!

SEPTEMBER 11 2015 [622328]visits.

This is the current underflow current of TYRANNY on the rise in BRITAIN as well as AMERICA... you just cannot see it can you???

SEPTEMBER 10 2015 [622300]visits.
David Robinson created a doc in the group: Practical Lawful Dissent.
The Lien process by Musashi.
My old posts contain the bulk of the relevant lien information - which need not be repeated here.
The document process is as follows: Affidavit of Truth – Notarised - ten days Notice of Interest - Not notarised - twenty one days Affidavit of Obligation/commercial lien – Notarised - thirty days (money claims are always 30 days!) Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure – Notarised - three days Certificate of Default – Notarised - YOU DO NOT SEND THIS OUT. It is for your use.
Ninety days from the date of receipt of the Affidavit of Obligation you get a Perfected Lien.
Monetising. This is just a fancy word for enforcement of debt and it has taken you away from the simple processes by which we enforce payments and away into the arcane world of brokers and the hypothecation of debt. The names have been changed to protect the guilty, but the process remains the same old process. You will find it in its entirety in the CIVIL PROCEDURES RULES, PRE ACTION PROTOCOLS and PRACTICE DIRECTIONS. Reference will have to be made to the SUPREME COURT RULES and THE COUNTY COURT RULES.
Make a Civil Procedures Rules Part 7 claim in Admiralty and, under CPR Part 12, ask for a Default Judgement. If you get the order of the court then you jump to CPR Part 70 – enforcement of debt. This tells you the processes open to you to enforce payment and the weight of la la that you may call upon to help you. It's just the same old process that councils, bailiffs, and others use against us.
CPR Part 40 is about judgements, orders and sale of land.
CPR Part 70 tells you about the measures available for the debt enforcement.
CPR Part 72 is about Third Party Debt Orders. Apply for an interim order then, at the appropriate time, apply for a final order.
CPR Part 73 is about Charging Orders. Apply same as above.
Attachment Orders come from the ATTACHMENT OF EARNINGS ACT, 1971.
An Attachment Order sent to the BANK OF ENGLAND will get them to go to work for you if the debtor has any stocks and shares. How cool is that! Securities are defined for us in the CHARGING ORDERS ACT, 1979 section 2 (2)b. Notice the Secretary of the Company.
All banks must respond to notices sent to them to reveal any accounts held by them for the debtor. They have to say if they have none, and they have to say if they have one. There is a two week and one week response time in place for whichever response. Charging Orders and Attachments must be obeyed by them and any account may not be reduced from the time of receipt of the order.
The LAND CHARGES DEPARTMENT will be noticed, and any land held by the debtor will pass any revenues from it to you. This is done under the LAND CHARGES ACT 1925/1972 Registration of Encumbrances.
The TRUST REGISTRY will also be noticed and, in turn, notice the lien debtor. They have a curious way with this. They write and tell you that you are on their register, that you can do bugger all about it - then ask you why you should not be on there and why you should be taken off!!! Bloody weird, what? They are in Cleveland street, London.
Some funds cannot be touched – for example; half pay of military officers; wages, money held for you by the government, and certain pensions. The full info for this may be found in the RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT, 1981 section 40 (3), and COUNTY COURTS ACT, 1984, section 108 (3). Generally, Third Party Debt Orders, Attachments and Charges will have the desired effect.
Writs. The WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS, (fi. fa.) now called a WARRANT OF EXECUTION, is written by you and handed to the HIGH COURT CHIEF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. He it is who has replaced the Sheriff in the enforcement of debt. Names have changed but the processes are still the same. Satisfied that you have the order of the court, that the writ is complete, he will take his posse and go get your money. He will take money, goods and property to the amount of the debt, interest on the same, and the costs of the enforcement.
The WRIT OF ELEGIT is now known as a WRIT OF POSSESSION, and is done under the LAND CHARGES ACT 1925/1972. This transfer of the debtor's property and goods is legal and supported by the PROPERTY ACT, 1925 and the SALE OF GOODS ACT, section 26.
Interest rates, and the time it runs. This is to be found in JUDGEMENT ACTS, 1838, and COUNTY COURT ACTS, 1984
Freezing Order. CPR Part 25. If your debtor gets wind of what you are doing to him he may try to conceal his property, goods, money, and so on before execution of the order. If there is a genuine fear of this, and you can demonstrate this to the court, then you may get a Freezing Order to prevent this. This FO is draconian and will have to be fully and completely justified in order to get it. If your dictionary is old, or you are still using that Yankee Blacks Law Dictionary, then you may know it as a Mareva Injunction. You need to get rid of the Blacks Law and get an up to date English one. Many terms have changed, and you will struggle in vain to find something here that you read about in Blacks. Blacks will tell you about the sheriff – but not about the HIGH COURT CHIEF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.
Concealment. Your debtor may conceal his goods, property and money. There is no law against this even if he does it after judgement against him. If he has done this successfully, then there is little you can do about it except search for it. If there is a suspicion that they are in a particular place, or held by a particular person, then the HCCEO may enter that place and seize them. If he gets it wrong he is liable, so if you really want to push you had better offer to bond him and his motley crew. Any goods or property sold after the judgement is given may be taken from the new owners without compensation.
Trusts. A lien lasts for ninety nine years but a lien put into trust has perpetuity. That is to say that the lien is against the goods and property – not the man - and should he die and his heirs take possession of the goods and property, the lien still holds good for all time because it is against the property and not the man.
Insurance. If you have a perfected lien against an insured official, then you can lodge a claim against his bond in the same manner as any other insurance claim might be made. It is a felony of fraud for an insurance company to fail to pay out on a proven claim. If they refuse to pay then it will be because the lien debtor acted outside of the scope of his office for which he was insured. Basically they will say “We did not insure you to act in this manner. You are on your own!” In short, the official is on his own full commercial liability and may not hide his culpability behind limited liability insurance. The man is on the hook – not the legal fiction - and a cardboard box behind TESCO is his future. If the official has committed a genuine crime then they may well insist on a prosecution to avoid the payout of a multi million pound sum. Either way, a refusal to pay out on the claim supports your claim of tort.
Life assurance. A debtor is an insurable interest. If one has an insurable interest then one can insure the life of the interest. An insurable interest is defined as “having a benefit from its existence and a prejudice from its loss”. A debtor is just such a thing. This is why mortgage companies like you to take out insurance against their possible loss in mortgaging you. You are their debtor. A sweet bonus to the existing mortgage scam!
With your lien registered at court as a debt you may take out life insurance on the debtor. If you maintain the premiums then, even if he has subsequently paid the debt in full, you will receive the value of the policy upon his death. A good long term investment. The law was changed a couple of hundred years back to prevent people taking out life assurance on total strangers – as was a practice at that time, but this law was accidentally repealed by the GAMING ACT. Watch your back! Generally, it is the debtor who takes out the policy, but the creditor may do so also. Of course, the insuring company does not have to take your business, so there is no guarantee given here.
If you can get high enough up the food chain in a bank – I failed there for lack of real effort, but el Spaniardo sounds like he went much further – then you can use the perfected, registered lien as collateral for a loan. Similarly, a loan may be had with the life policy as collateral, though certain written undertakings must be given to the bank to secure their loan and assign rights to surrender the policy and so on.
I doubt you will get that high up the food chain going through the high street banks, though it is both interesting and entertaining to go into a few banks and try. In this manner you will be convinced of their utter ignorance of banking and get a first hand view of how the elite operate through their “useful idiots”. I acknowledge the COMMON PURPOSE leader, Julia Middleton, for that phrase. Cheers, Julie babe. It took me a while, but I did finally find a bank manager who had heard of the FEDERAL RESERVE. I never did find one who had even heard of Modern Money Mechanics. I found plenty who thought that they loaned out their depositors' money! “That's why we need you to deposit yours – so we can lend it out!” That was the point where I gave up.
Imprisonment. The DEBTORS ACT, 1835 mostly prevents imprisonment for debt. However, there are certain debts for which you may still be jailed – mostly for the convenience of the state when you do not pay up on one of their charges, such as maintenance or council tax. However, you may still be imprisoned for non payment of other debts under the charge of contempt of court. Contempt for not obeying the court and paying up. Usually this is for six weeks at a time and it does not diminish the debt by any amount. A debtor may be imprisoned any number of times while the debt remains unsatisfied.
This is the bones of the process with most of the flesh tacked on. You must, I say again MUST, do your own study. You must go into the CPR and SCR and CCR to do your own work. What I have given here will not be sufficient. There are details I have not included. I do not do so because to do so would require a much longer writing than this and you are more empowered when you get your own study done. You must not rely only on what I have written here, so I leave the smaller, but very, very important details out. There are not many missing, but in the search for them you will gain much, much more than these meager, missing little points. Be certain to read the PRE ACTION PROTOCOLS and PRACTICE DIRECTIONS associated with each Part of the CPR. Judges get a bit tetchy when you mess these up and it may mess up your court claim. THEY are not the least bit happy that we have commercial liens and are searching high and low for ways to screw us over their bench. Do not give them the chance. Create immaculate documents. Follow the CPR to the letter.
I have put in a fair amount of time over the years - from introducing liens to fmotl to producing this last process. Do me a kindness in return and run your lien as well as may be. Take no short-cuts – there are none. Do your study – most of it is here, already done for you, and you need only go to where you are directed and learn the few small details so vital to success. Take your time. Be certain.
I would advise all of you to leave out that irritating nonsense about “without vexation, frivolity ...” and the rest. It is complete bullshit nonsense and, personally, I find it very embarrassing.
Kind regards, MUSASHI

SEPTEMBER 9 2015 [622284]visits.
David Robinson edited a doc in the group: Practical Lawful Dissent.
Constitution and Trial by Jury.
If you are an American, Canadian, Australian, Chinese, Russian or African, what, you might ask, does the European Constitution have to do with me ? The answer is that to understand whether one’s own constitution is as protective of your inherent citizen’s legal rights as it should be, it is helpful to compare it with others. This book shows the difference between the phoney, illegal antidemocratic ‘constitution’ which installs despotism (absolute government control over the people), and the real constitution which will establish Justice, Liberty, Rights and Democracy if it installs particular definitive tenets, and these are strictly upheld.
Constitutions can only be maintained by an active mass of the common people strictly monitoring, maintaining and protectively enforcing their constitution, the populace needing always to be educated to the fact that governments (i.e. the executive, the politicians and the judiciary) at all times and in all places trend towards despotism.
The pernicious calumny that England (or Britain) has "no constitution," is promulgated today by individuals of parliament and judiciary, to obscure their routine violation of the 35 times ratified Constitution. From this vile seed despotism is now visibly extant and growing.
The Old Soviet and the New European Union’s Despotic ‘Constitutions’.
The old Soviet and the new European Union ‘constitutions’ are perfidious antidemocratic ‘Munich guarantees’ which exemplify constitutional despotism.
These ‘constitutions’ embody gross institutional tyranny. As documents they profess to acknowledge people’s ‘rights’, but altogether deny the only (peaceful) means and rights known to mankind by which tyranny is surely circumvented: the citizens’ rights and duties in Trial by Jury, including that of judging the justice of the law in finding a verdict.
Without the Trial by Jury empowerment of citizens judging for themselves and nullifying what ordinary people deem to be illegal unjust acts of government, people cannot but be slaves to the whim of politicians and judges who retain all power to decide the law and run roughshod over the people.
Democracy and Gravitas.
Consider this subject as of the utmost gravitas, one between freedom and slavery; life and death. It is not solely one of academic study and semasiology.
We have all lost family and close ones to the wars and ravages of despots. Let us strive hard for Restoration and Universal Adoption of Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury… because Democracy and Trial by Jury together inseparable as one, form the unique political and constitutional system of peace, progress and human salvation.
Democracy installs the role of Juror as the citizen’s most important secular adult duty. Democratic Trial by Jury alone proffers the preservation of individuals without prejudice in regard to their race, gender, religion and background. In Trial by Jury, democracy intentionally recognizes that all men and women are created equal. Trial by Jury renders to every adult the responsibility and status of equal and judge. This contributes to the creation of an ethos of civility, mutual respect, liberty, legality and fraternity.
There is nothing new in this struggle for liberty. It is for each successive generation to take up, rekindle and pass on the Torch of Freedom. The Constitution Treatise was written with this in mind. A brief excerpt follows:
"Constitutional adoption and practical implementation of the Citizen-Juror’s Duty in Trial by Jury, to judge the justice of every act of law enforcement, define, and comprise the basis of, Democracy, sine qua non."
See paragraphs quoted from The Constitution Treatise. They explain and define democracy.
1. "Only as long as juries of ordinary citizens have the final say, government remains the servant, not the master, of the people."
2. "Suffrage does not define democracy, for electoral voting takes place in totalitarian states. Having been elected, there is nothing to stop government from imposing control of an upper house, reneging on pledges, nor from adopting any tyrannical measures it chooses."
3. "Constitutional adoption and practical implementation of the Citizen-Juror’s Duty in Trial by Jury, to judge the justice of every act of law enforcement, define and comprise the basis of, Democracy, sine qua non."
4. "In practice and by definition, government which denies its ordinary citizens the right to judge the justice of the laws and the manner of their enforcement on their fellow citizens at trial, is a despotism."
5. "Constitutions which deny the Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System install constitutional despotism."
"For centuries since 1215, the English people revered and called Magna Carta "the Palladium* of the People’s Liberties." The Juror’s Duty to judge the justice of law enforcement in Trial by Jury was the foundation of the People’s sincere belief that all Britons never would be slaves; and that the United Kingdom, the United States, and the numerous post-colonial nations which constitutionally adopted the Common Law Trial by Jury Justice System, are democracies."
*"NOTE. Definition, Palladium: any safeguard; a symbol, metaphorical or statuary, which represents the protection of the liberties and rights of man. Derived from Pallas Athene, Hellenic Greek goddess of wisdom and war. Today, the world’s most famous Palladia are the Trial by Jury, and The Statue of Liberty in New York harbour."
"With Trial by Jury holding sway, the People are served, not ruled, by governments, whose laws count for nought unless they be just. Such government cannot but embody civilized ideals and aspirations. Because no tyrant can attain power, this government only attracts and is comprised of truly democratic representatives. At the behest of juries of ordinary citizens, the state is constrained into enforcing only just democratic principles which accord with the People’s judgement, such as those represented by common law: fraternity, liberty, egalitarianism, progress and justice."
"By the diligent upholding of this Constitution, all tyranny is nipped in the bud. Not only are bureaucratic and fiscal injustices eliminated, but tyrants, great and petty, are emasculated. This enforceable democratic control by the People was emplaced to extend equally over the historic and current ‘religious’ tyrannies, as to secular, which are suffered under man’s inhumanity to man. Thus, Constitutional Democracies (of all types, monarchical and republican) founded on the Common Law Trial by Jury respond to, but cannot initiate, aggression, including wars so-defined. If Trial by Jury had remained operating throughout the European nations, whence it originated, the Hohenzollern and Hitler tyrannies would have been truncated, and the Holocaust and both World Wars averted."
[End of excerpt from The Constitution Treatise ISBN 9781902848747.]
The Author’s related works are endorsed by a Nobel laureate professor emeritus Official Adviser to U.S. government; a Professor of Physiology Fellow of the Royal Society, by eminent authors, academics, doctors of jurisprudence, medicine, psychiatry, homeopathy, and by ecologists and judges (U.S. and U.K.).
This Treatise is an inspiring erudite work of incontrovertible argument, with quotations in support by U.S. presidents, U.K. prime ministers, chief justices, judges, learned authors and lawyers.
The book presents the subject from a heretofore entirely unconsidered standpoint. The knowledge it contains empowers citizens with constitutional facts recondite even to the legal profession.
The exemplary U.S. and U.K. constitutional laws are the standard by which any proposed new legislation is measured. This book exposes the deceit by which d’Estaing and committee (who claim to protect rights and democracy) duplicitously word a ‘constitution’ which actually installs the identical Stalinist and fascist method of population-control, to form the statist regime of the new Europe.
WE THE PEOPLE… (demos; the people) The Legal Criteria of Constitutional Democracy.
A nation state governs by its Justice System. The power to punish carries with it ALL power. If at any time, albeit for an instant, the Supreme Power is removed from or ceded by the people, and the power is acquired by, or delegated to, a group consisting of LESS than all the People, then the democratic state has ceased to exist: an undemocratic government, that is, a despotism, has assumed its place.
It was explicitly to counteract arbitrary (i.e. corrupt; tyrannical) government that the protections of Magna Carta installed the people’s "law of the land" criteria of constitutional democracy "in perpetuity" and "for ever." See Preamble & Article 63. These criteria, which were also constitutionally adopted by the U.S. Founding Fathers, have been the foundation of compassionate democratic civilization through the tribulations of a long varied history. As has repeatedly occurred in the past, instead of upholding them, present-day criminal ‘politicians’ now intend their destruction.
This "law of the land" is now called common law. See Democracy Defined Essay for Members #9; "LEGEM TERRÆ: THE PEOPLE AND THEIR COMMON LAW REIGN SUPREME."
These democratic protections are as follows:

(i) the citizen’s right to a Trial by a Jury of peers (i.e. social-equals, not trial by government or its employees);
(ii) the right and duty of the Juror to judge on the justice of the law and its enforcement in finding the Verdict in Trial by Jury (i.e. Jury Nullification);
(iii) freedom from arbitrary arrest (i.e. without probable cause);
(iv) freedom from arbitrary detention (later known as Habeas Corpus);
(v) equality before the law.
Many Europeans have lost all memory of democracy and their Gothic heritage of Common Law Trial by Jury. They were deceived by their unscrupulous politicians who praised the numerous social benefits listed in the so-called ‘European Constitution’, without sufficiently alerting them to the fact that all the terms of the ‘constitution’ are not guaranteed; they do not control and bind the governing bodies in the slightest. Some ‘constitution’!
On the contrary, the terms are actually changeable at any time at the whim of the unelected commissioners (commissars) of the Supreme Soviet (council) System: citizens are utterly at the mercy of the inquisitorial methods of trial-by-judge, which denies habeas corpus (freedom from arbitrary detention); freedom from arbitrary arrest (without probable cause); and Trial by Jury.
Ipso facto, the ‘European Treaty-Constitution’* is NOT a constitution; it is literally a charter of mass enslavement to the power of, or behind, the state.
*Definition-in-brief: a constitution is a binding code for the guidance and control of government, changeable only by the active participation of the great mass of the people.
The Spanish decision, for example, overruled a significant proportion of the population, which, when added to the large number who did not vote (to adopt it), was the real majority. Thus was the execrable result of government-by-referendum.
The common law is "the law of the land," legem terræ, the People’s fundamental code and law of which Trial by Jury is the central tenet and sole justice system, as inscribed into the Magna Carta of 1215. See chapter [i.e. article] 39. Common law does not include any statutes made by government nor decisions made by judges.
See TRIAL BY JURY: Its History, True Purpose and Modern Relevance ISBN 9781902848723.
Also see Democracy Defined Essay for Members #9: "LEGEM TERRÆ: THE PEOPLE AND THEIR COMMON LAW REIGN SUPREME; The Law of the Land Is the Common Law and Vice Versa."
Also see the constitutional, historical and law texts of Blackstone, Crabbe, Palgrave, Coke, Hume, Stewart, Hallam, Gilbert, Hale, et al.
The common law which existed in 1215 A.D., at the time of the Great Charter Constitution’s (Magna Carta’s) first of many enactments and ratifications, must be differentiated from that which modern government has corrupted by legislation: a counterfeit which is "common law" in name only. Common law is emphatically neither "government-made" nor "judge-made." Quite the contrary: it is exclusively the product of the sense of fairness, natural law and justice of the ordinary people. Modern usurpation notwithstanding, genuine common law does not consist of case precedents (stare decisis), for juries decide the law, which includes the sentence, in each individual case. Nor is it comprised of judicial rulings, decisions or interpretations of statutes.
Common law does not ever or in any way come from government judges. Indeed, common law is the antithesis (the ‘opposite’) of judge-made law, and it is supposed to free all the people equally from the shackles of arbitrary government and their bidden employees. This common law, inserted into the Constitution, binds government and legally controls the government’s modus operandi. Common law is the basis of democracy, sine qua non.
The constitutional information contained in this work is essential to the protection, well-being and happiness of citizens.
This Treatise is that rare phenomenon: a book on law which is gripping and stimulating for the everyday reader. After perusing this book, readers are enabled to perceive the ignorance or degenerate motivations of every person who advocates measures which erode the U.S. or U.K. constitutions.

SEPTEMBER 3 2015 [622151]visits.

SEPTEMBER 1 2015 [622040]visits.

The CORRUPT court of protection has now been filed with a commercial lien claim for £20 million pounds damages, for the HUMAN RIGHTS BREACHES to ann clarke and her son/carer of 20 years mike clarke whom had to flee for their safety from the UK in January 2013 when bent court of protection "JUDGE PELLING" commited treason on them, by denying due process of a common law court of record - JURY of 12 PEERS. This application containing some 200 pages consists of the arrogance of the JEW process of corruption being commited routinely in CROWN buildings purporting to offer JUSTICE? .. THAT are in fact inflicting upon christians!

AUGUST 30 2015 [622020]visits.
And the lack of ACCOUNTABILITY going on in BRITAIN.

AUGUST 29 2015 [622015]visits.

The criminal elite are being taken to task by the common man under common law where a grand jury will be convened to provide the force of LAW.

SIR Peter FAHY chief constable of greater manchester accepts default.

Michael GOVE resident SARAH GOVE/VINE accepts delivery of DEFAULT NOTICE.

AUGUST 27 2015 [621967]visits.
Warning to Government
This is not a request that requires an answer, it does however require a response – by way of action on your part that demonstrates that you understand its substance and the seriousness of our intent. The national collective political establishment has betrayed the ‘People’ by hijacking our sovereignty and engaging in criminal activities in a subservient role to a foreign power without our consent. This is in defiance of our constitution and an act of treason. You do not need to know how many people we represent today, only how many we might represent tomorrow and you should know that our numbers grow daily. This letter thus serves as your window of opportunity to make amends and give remedy for the crimes committed against us.
We will show compassion for those who recant and we will be ruthless with those who do not concede to the wishes of the people. Ignoring this letter is not an option… if you think it is, then this serves only to demonstrate that your intellect is subservient to your arrogance.
You may feel that you can ignore it because you are too powerful, but to do so is to underestimate the seething resentment that the people feel for the political establishment in general.
You have acted in contempt of the principles of democracy and shown total disregard for our right to govern ourselves. For the past several decades the ‘People’ have been treated with extraordinary and total contempt by the collective political establishment.
It has not mattered which political party has been in office or “power” as you insist on calling it, nothing ever changes. We are continually subjected to the same global agenda.
We have been used and abused like pawns in your game of supremacy in which a dynastic ruling class see themselves as ordained to rule as masters – with impunity, whilst we the people, as virtual slaves, are supposedly destined to obey – without question.
You have persistently and consistently undermined our democracy by agreeing to treaties with foreign political elites who have no business in our affairs. You have rewarded yourselves with the trappings of office – high salaries, luxuries denied most of us, privileges, bonuses, pensions, prestige and benefits that we can only dream of… whilst burdening us with ever-higher taxes, derisory pensions and declining standards of public services.
It is we who pay the price for your malfeasance. The story of our ‘People’ over the past several decades that will be told in the history books of tomorrow is the story of betrayal, greed, corruption, nepotism, treason and modern-day fascism – the latter of which manifests itself in the global agenda being imposed upon us against our will.
The United Nations – a step process towards TOTAL global governance is now fully exposed. Built on lies and deceit is being hoisted by its own petard – the edifice is crumbling but still the political elite like demented fools, continue to feed on their own delusions. The docile masses, mesmerized by trivia, propaganda, complacency and ignorance have still somehow managed to grasp some basic elements of the truth, alerted almost certainly by the blatant and arrogant refusal of the political elite to tell the truth even when it stands proud in the rubble of political deceit and betrayal.
The political classes are discredited at every level. They rant about the benefits of our subjugation to a foreign enterprise, peace, prosperity and democracy where in reality chaos, dictatorship and corruption reign supreme.
Western economies are on the brink of collapse because of the corrupt banking cartels, there is visible resistance on the streets and people call for lawful rebellion. But less known, there is clandestine resistance behind closed doors.
Whilst the majorities advocate a peaceful uprising, the extremes will always be in the mix and when passion and anger are fused and those aggrieved can find no remedy… violent resistance is as understandable as the passion for life itself.
The police and militia that you currently rely on to defend yourselves against the people’s retribution… are made up of our own, they are not your people – and when they learn about your betrayal and your intent… AND THEY WILL – they will turn against you.
Their awakening, which you cannot stop, is your Achilles heel. Your greatest fear must be that we will impose upon you the regimes and repression that you had planned for us. People are meeting in groups across the country, talking across oceans… they are disparate, disorganized and without an effective plan to repel the global agenda…as yet.
BUT a leadership is emerging… organizers are coordinating and small groups are linking to form larger groups. The dichotomies of left v right, Christian v Muslim, black v white, Catholic v Protestant, which have been used to great effect to divide and conquer in the past, will find no favour in this war. The call to arms that will unite us will be ‘the people v the global elite’ – the cry will cascade street to street and find easy passage and universal support – for our common purpose has greater value and strength than yours.
We have a constitution – which you ignore. We have been denied our democratic rights, regardless, we have clearly expressed our wishes, in one opinion poll after another, that we do not want to be governed by a foreign un-elected officialdom, but still you disregard us. We are promised a referendum on our future, but then you ignore the results or recant.
You speak in support of our views when in opposition, but act to the contrary when we elect you. You consult with corporate executives, international bankers, non-government organizations, international charities, academia, foreign dignitaries, political elites, think tanks and lobbyist – collectively a tiny minority, who do not represent us.
These groups all emanate from the same social strata, with their own agendas to satisfy and all funded by the same cartel. You take note of their every whim, but you care not a jot for what we think or what we want. Your children are given jobs, with big salaries fresh from university and then rapidly climb the corporate ladder as a reward by the same corporate bodies who you have favoured with your decisions. Our children must make their own way in an increasingly desperate world.
Your corporatism suppresses our freedoms with deliberate and malicious intent. You accommodate tyrants, dictators, arms dealers and all manner of dubious characters, with whom you are happy to keep company. You turn a blind eye when the smell of money wafts your nostrils… it suppresses the stink of corruption and evil. Your moral compasses are defunct… your values deplorable and motives despicable. Our soldiers die to service your corporate agenda – their blood is on your hands. You are educated at the same elite schools and members of the same elite clubs and you allow these influences to override the consideration which should be paramount in service of the people. You have adopted the “I’ll scratch your back if you scratch mine” philosophy… because you have learnt from your predecessors that corruption and deception do indeed pay. The United Nations Security Council is awash with it and you have determined to get your snout in the same trough. You take comfort from the fact that you control those who have the authority to indict you for your riminality… because they too have fallen prey to the corruption.
You have sold off our national resources to your friends, divided communities, deprived villages and towns, undermined, destroyed and bulldozed indigenous communities. You have laid waste where once prosperity was enjoyed. But you have not suffered… you have remained aloof, disengaged, uninvolved – removed from the debris and the misery that you have wreaked upon the rest of us.
Our farms no longer feed us with the nutrients we require to sustain healthy lives, crippled by regulations, supranational mining contracts made to favour foreign farmers or ‘Coal Seam Gas Fracking’ that is destroying the once fertile soils of our landscape. Our armed forces are forced to commit crimes against humanity by the requirement to adhere to the unlawful and communist manifesto of the United Nations Charter and we see foreign troops being trained on our own soil on the pretence that they may be needed to protect us… when the reality is they are being trained to subdue us… to protect you from our vengeance.
Our children are victims of social engineering in the schools and declining standards of education. They are being sexualized by explicit exposures before they have the emotional maturity to be able to cope. You are destroying their minds and their childhoods.
You have engineered a police state with legislation that empowers you at our expense and you have been blatant in your contempt for our democratic and constitution rights and our common law, which have been known to us for centuries. You deny us our rights and our freedoms and contemptuously imply that you can provide us with a Bill of Rights.
Would we seriously trust a thief with our wallets? You have corrupted our courts by appointing judges who are contemptuous of our common law and installed a law society that disperses Maritime/Admiralty Law through the people’s courts. You have dissected our nation and sold off our infrastructure.
We are forced to buy our own water from foreign corporations which grow rich on the back of our suffering. You are then rewarded by them with lucrative directorships when you slip quietly from office with your bulging pensions. You remain oblivious, unconcerned… disconnected.
We will no longer be ignored as you go about your globalist agenda. We will resist your controlling and petty rules and regulations… we will resist your fines and penalty charges and challenge your corrupt and biased judges, we will defy the over-zealous police, and your oppressive and unlawful taxes.
It is our intention to govern ourselves… we do not seek your permission – this is our right. You have had your opportunity and you have failed. We will take control of our own lives in stages, as and when it suits us. Our numbers will grow as we show by example that prosperity is the natural consequence of honest and fair governance. We will expose you for the parasites you are. This country has a constitution – which you ignore. We have Magna Carta, we have trial by jury and habeas corpus. We have our customs, traditions and common law. We have the right of petition, free speech, and free movement and above all… we have the right to govern ourselves. These are our inalienable rights – they are not privileges granted to us by you or your ilk. They cannot be taken away or extinguished at the whim of political diktat or through corrupt judicial process and certainly not at the behest of foreign undemocratic institutions.
You have no authority to dictate… your duty is to serve. We are a sovereign nation… a proud people. We have watched our country slowly destroyed… by you – we now see clearly what you have done… your purpose and your betrayal. We will honour our inheritance – the freedoms fought for and secured for us, and we will ensure that we will pass this on to the next generation, to our children and theirs. You have been sent this letter by a constituent. On sending a copy to you, they have also registered your name with our coordinators. This will remain with us as evidence for your trial… for treason, when necessary. It’s your choice.

AUGUST 26 2015 [621947]visits.

For years now I have seen my fellow country-folk try to contest the policies of the last 20 years with no victories at all to speak of for those protesting the policies of the last four governments.
All of these four governments have removes rights that our people have paid for with blood sweat and tears.
All of these governments have removed previous and pertinent evidence of child abuse by their co workers.
All of the last four governments knew the bankers were ripping the people and the nation off in different fashions from Ppi’s to rigging differently rates and libor rigging, false accounts, shadow banking, tax evasion and avoidance.
Even the simplicity of not paying taxes has become a legal quagmire if handled properly by professional legalese experts (a lawyer), instead of just not paying their due, the elite and our representatives are avoiding tax, using tax havens, owning family run tax havens and tax avoidance companies.
Whole companies have been set up to return monies stolen by bankers with Ppi’s and the like, that money came from our taxes and borrowed money, it is not being paid back by the bankers who stole it in the first place, its being paid by us, the people it was stolen from in the first place.
These are policies of our government and the previous governments who understand the criminality involved in setting up these ppi’s, libor rigging etc.
People committed these crimes against us all and our governments will not arrest of jail them. Instead LAWS are made to protect them, the offending bakers.
Whilst you squander time arguing the policies of our representatives, they are committing criminal offences from child abuse to human rights violations.
Argue the criminality, protest the criminal offences, kick off about the abuse of children, robbing bankers and our representative’s fixation on protecting both cohorts of offenders, and they are criminal offenders.
If the people do not police parliament and our representatives who will………..themselves?
Richard Card I like the way you talk about past twenty years. In 1972 as a young Pc I was appointed Coroners Officer to investigate the death of volunteer Matron Mary McGill of the Sue Ryder HQ Care Home Suffolk.
But then a DI tried to order me to destroy the body's clothing and footwear to prevent forensic testing. I took the view if you want that done mate you do it ! And my feet didn't touch. Three months later a sergeant despatched from Chief constable was offering me transfer to another force but if I resigned he was to warn me to move out of Suffolk anyway.
But I sort of said "I'll be back". And over the subsequent 43 years I have done exactly that.
The Sue Ryder charity was founded by two MI6 men Henry Nathan Sporborg and Airey Neave. And in case you haven't sussed what a small world it is at the top of the power pecking order if you look at who selected and steered their puppet Thatcher to lead the tories ? Yep Neave and Sporborg.
GLADIO ? Read about CIA and James Jesus Angleton and USA running a secret army across Europe since the end of WW2. But deeper research shows that GLADIO was the brainchild 1944 of a certain Henry Nathan Sporborg.
I mention the history I have pursued because I wonder if you may believe that we live in a democracy within a constitutional monarchy?
What appeared to be little things slipped under the radar of our politicians. Jack Straw repeal of Unlawful Drilling Act 1819 in 2008. Harold Wilson repeals of Misprision of Felony and Unlawful Societies Act. All being examples

AUGUST 26 2015 [621946]visits.
Notice to serve!
Notice of High treason
You have been served notice that Queen Elizabeth Windsor aka Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg Gothe commited six acts of High treason at Common Law by signing the treaties of Lisbon. Upon notice of this, your duty is uphold the law in not doing so, you will be Committing a criminal offence of misprison of treason. Your authority as a police officer is therefore ultra vires, you will be committing fraud via misreprentation.
It has come to light that a long range deception strategy to create a single Federal European state with the erosion of each nation’s sovereignty, currency and the powers to determine its own laws and affairs, was finalised by the Geopolitical Centre of the third Reich in Berlin in 1942.
This was done with the effect that should the Nazis lose the war militarily, they could continue their plans for a European dictatorship economically by way of corporatism and political subversion. Their future vision of Europe is detailed in the seminars entitled ‘Europäische Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft’ which curiously translates into English as ‘European Economic Community.
E.E.C.’ These days we call it the E.U. The chapter headings of this Nazi document were replicated almost verbatim 50 years later in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. The fact that any part of a Nazi document should be utilised in a European Treaty should be cause for considerable alarm.
In 2001 HM The Queen was served with a Barons’ Petition in accordance with the provisions of Magna Carta 1215 instructing her to; Withhold the Royal Assent from any Parliamentary Bill which attempts to ratify the Treaty of Nice unless and until the people of the United Kingdom had given clear and specific approval: AND To uphold and preserve the rights, freedoms and customs of your loyal subjects as set out in
Magna Carta and the declaration of rights, which you our sovereign, swore before the nation to uphold and preserve in your Coronation Oath. The Queen failed to respond appropriately. The Queen has breached the Coronation Oath.
The provisions of A.61 Magna Carta 1215 are still in force today and shall remain so until a Constitutional Convention declares otherwise. This country is currently in a condition of rebellion.
In October 2009, following the Lisbon ‘Treaty,' purported statutes and Regulations that are repugnant to the Common Law are being applied within the UK. This is unlawful use of the Royal Prerogative. This is Treason.
Evidence of Treason: “Shoe-horned into the EU”

AUGUST 26 2015 [621936]visits.
James Antony Mee
I find it intriguing how almost every professional in Social Services, without fail, will endevour to defend the actions of other professionals, even though their counterparts may have engaged in profound and utter deceit. Seemingly it is acceptable to lie, commit perjury, falsify information and to pervert the course of justice, as it suits, when it suits, all whilst using the most malicious and untrue statements imaginable, to remove children from their parents care.
However, there is criteria which you need to fulfil, before you can engage in this "child trafficking" activity. You need to be employed as a Social Worker, or as an employee of Cafcass, or the family courts, i.e be employed by the state. I guess judging by the travesty of injustice, along with its seemingly inevitable and grotesque psychological abuse, which seems to be rife throughout the whole family court system, that the state and its politicians must know an awful lot about lying, falsifying evidence and creating and engineering evidence, for its own purposes in order to be able to allow such a deplorable system, one which is in fact the epitome of fabrication, deceit and outright dishonesty, to continue.
Perhaps instead of castigating this den of iniquity though, one should congratulate those in Social Services for being able to lie, devise, manufacture and create, with such extraordinary deviancy that even supposedly well educated judges can no longer tell fact from fiction, whereby they err on the side of caution. Or maybe it is simply that judges themselves are simply nothing more than puppets of the state?

AUGUST 24 2015 [621883]visits.

AUGUST 24 2015 [621875]visits.


the ROGUE MALE report

AUGUST 22 2015 [621855]visits.

AUGUST 21 2015 [621830]visits.

The curse of debt by satanic priests of baal.

AUGUST 21 2015 [621825]visits.

An American judge known for his harsh and autocratic courtroom manner was jailed for 28 years for conspiring with private prisons to hand young offenders maximum sentences in return for kickbacks amounting to millions of dollars.
Mark Ciavarella Jnr was ordered to pay $1.2m (£770,000) in restitution after he was found to be a “figurehead” in the conspiracy that saw thousands of children unjustly punished in the name of profit in the case that became known as “kids for cash”.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has overturned some 4,000 convictions issued by the former Luzerne County judge between 2003 and 2008, claiming he violated the constitutional rights of the juveniles – including the right to legal counsel and the right to intelligently enter a plea. Ciavarella Jnr, 61, was tried and convicted of racketeering charges earlier this year but his lawyers had asked for a “reasonable” sentence, claiming that he had already been punished enough.

AUGUST 20 2015 [621800]visits.

Of course he then had 14 days to respond and has failed and so now, today we issue his default notice along with MP GORDON MARSDEN, secratary of state for justice MICHAEL GOVE and the chief constable of MANCHESTER, SIR PETER FAHY.
The perfected lien will be complete on or about the 5th September where these liens will be incorporated into a court case.

AUGUST 18 2015 [621742]visits.
I am writing this in the form of a notice because my previous request along similar lines was ignored.
There have been several grand jury decisions presented to you so that you could direct the accused to appear before a jury.
To date I believe nothing has been forthcoming from you. Were I to have conducted myself in the manner of those persons whose conduct was examined by the grand juries, I would have been arrested and charged.
The only conclusion that any man or woman could come to is that you are acting outside the rule of law because you have a duties that require you to progress the decisions of the grand juries by placing the accused before a jury. You have no powers at common law to stop this. As common law is superior to statute law you must follow precedent. If you do not then you yourself will be the subject of a grand jury and as you cannot judge the merits of your own case it will end up in the supreme court.
I therefore formally require you to place the matters presented to you by the grand juries before petit juries.
Signed john timbrell Cider Mill Cottage. Prossers Wood, Drybrook Gloucester GL17 9EY
PS circulated widely for my own protection.

AUGUST 14 2015 [621665]visits.
I have never had children taken into care, but have close friends who have. As a result of helping others, I have encountered the inner workings of this deplorable and dysfunctional system. It is not about care, nor about looking after children. This system is about money making; it is even about the creating and engineering the grounds needed to remove children.
Time after time after time, I have seen reports written by Social Workers, which are totally unfactual, in fact the word factitious applies. Yet these reports will be presented in the family courts as being legitimate and also be quite happily accepted by a judge.
I have witnessed perjury, perversion of the course of justice, lies, deceit, dishonesty and have been able to do nothing. What I want to know is why this Government propagates and supports such a blatently corrupt system, when it is the taxpayer who foots the bill?
It is clear that in a considerable number of cases Social Workers have lied, conspired, written and presented false information. Why is this being allowed to continue unchecked and why are children being put at risk by the very professionals who are supposed to be there to support them? In fact what they are doing when they do this is child abuse in itself. Allocated power, is being used abusively and determinedly to attack and break up families, for no other reason than money. The fact is that this degenerate system, in itself, presents a real danger to children.
At the moment I am waiting for some who have experienced the wrongful removal from their parents to speak out, as older children are also being undermined by a system which engages in what amounts to nothing less than utterly immoral practice.

AUGUST 14 2015 [621660]visits.

Mike Clarke In a LEGAL world where money is the driving force it is also THE EVIL in it that corrupts and perverts JUSTICE, to suit the biggest pockets... THE LIEN is the only SANE document I have seen because it can be drafted without MONEY and served WITHOUT MONEY and its content of TRUTH provides the JUSTICE in itself... WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF. Needless to say John will not answer this either!
There are many friends of John HEMMINGS on facebook whom may not fully understand what I am talking about but when you start to link all the dots the picture becomes very clear and is VERY ALARMING.
TALMUDIC LAW is practised by the JEWS... JEWS and those with ZIONIST links have infiltrated our SYSTEM ie President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom Lord Neuberger IS practising such TALMUDIC LAW upon Christians... TALMUDIC LAW denies ALL rights of JUSTICE PROPERTY & MONEY to Christians.. if there aint any BIAS in that then where else do you need to look.
Kathy Danby- For some reason Eryka, Mike Clarke seems to think that that badgering and threatening John in this manner is going to help solve his problem. I have no idea what he expects John to do - he has never been specific about anything. John has offered him advice, but because he doesn't wish to take it, he is attacking John. I wish he would stop it, because he is doing himself no favours. I know John well enough to know he has tremendous patience, but I would imagine he has a limit, and I feel Mike Clarke has reached that limit - if not passed it. I know John is a fantastic guy, and they broke the mould when they made him - BUT HE IS NOT GOD!!! He has a private life that he has a perfect right to lead, especially as he is no longer an MP. I have seen what Mike Clarke hasn't - John on the campaign trail and conducting his constituency surgery, and believe me HE NEVER STOPPED. I sympathise with Mike Clarke, and, knowing the court of protection as I do, I am very sure he and his mother have been subjected to an injustice, but John is not the cause of this, and he cannot right the corruption and errors commited by others. Mike, take your complaint to the ones who can deal with it - AND STOP PERSECUTING JOHN. Sorry John for embarrassing you, but it needed saying, and you are to considerate to say it!!!
Mike Clarke- I am not persecuting JOHN I am simply trying to EXPOSE where the real flaws of the SYSTEM are and in fact I believe JOHN is afraid to go there for fear of repercussions or maybe some other reasons.. the FACT is it is no good beating around the BUSH this matter of CORRUPT COURT PROCESSES needs addressing in more severe manner and pressing the real buttons at the heart of the injustices that I personally would like to see JOHN on BOARD which is the matter of frustration... JOHN said I should not have gone down the route I did making a COMMERCIAL LIEN why?? A LIEN is a statement of TRUTH and if I lied I would have committed perjury and then you could send me to prison... WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE TRUTH KATHY?? Also under the governments PARENS PATRAIE control of a persons finances then it is they that must correct their own wrongs in the 1st instant INSTEAD of sweeping it under the carpet AS THEY HAVE?

AUGUST 13 2015 [621636]visits.

Over recent years I have become more and more concerned at the rise of what I have called "judicial imperialism", as some judges seem to me to want to enlarge their powers beyond the boundaries set by legislators. That is a separate matter from the time-honoured development of the common law based on the precedent of earlier court rulings.

AUGUST 11 2015 [621606]visits.

Mum tucks into her breakfast on SITGES seafront restaurant RED VELVET sporting her new birthday dress.. & where she resides in safety from PREDATORY GUARDIANS of the UK stalking theirs victims for MONEY PROPERTY denying due process of law as they go in a JEWdicial terrorist fashion.

AUGUST 11 2015 [621605]visits.

A senior magistrate resigned over new rules which mean repeat criminals will be continuously bailed – and court fees will go unpaid.
Bob Hutchinson, 60, stepped down from the Blackpool and Fylde magistrates bench after 11 years in protest at changes he believes are undermining the local justice system.

AUGUST 11 2015 [621600]visits.

Sovereign citizens believe that in the 1800s, the federal government was gradually subverted and replaced by an illegitimate government. They create their own driver’s licenses and include their thumbprints on documents to distinguish their flesh and blood person from a “straw man” persona that they say has been created by the false government. When writing their names, they often add punctuation marks like colons or hyphens.

AUGUST 9 2015 [621590]visits.

SUCCESS IN BARCELONAs C & A 4 hours later after several beers wines and spirits and a whole caboodle of TAPAS

Good old C & A

AUGUST 9 2015 [621558]visits.

Dean Kory
Admiralty law (also referred to as maritime law) is a distinct body of law which governs maritime questions and offenses. It is a body of both domestic law governing maritime activities, and private international law governing the relationships between private entities which operate vessels on the oceans. It deals with matters including marine commerce, marine navigation, marine salvaging, shipping, sailors, and the transportation of passengers and goods by sea. Admiralty law also covers many commercial activities, although land based or occurring wholly on land, that are maritime in character.
Admiralty law is distinguished from the Law of the Sea, which is a body of public international law dealing with navigational rights, mineral rights, jurisdiction over coastal waters and international law governing relationships between nations.
Although each legal jurisdiction usually has its own enacted legislation governing maritime matters, admiralty law is characterized by a significant amount of international law developed in recent decades, including numerous multilateral treaties.Seaborne transport was one of the earliest channels of commerce, and rules for resolving disputes involving maritime trade were developed early in recorded history. Early historical records of these laws include the Rhodian law (Nomos Rhodion Nautikos), of which no primary written specimen has survived, but which is alluded to in other legal texts (Roman and Byzantine legal codes), and later the customs of the Hanseatic League. In southern Italy the Ordinamenta et consuetudo maris (1063) at Trani and the Amalfian Laws were in effect from an early date.
Bracton noted further that admiralty law was also used as an alternative to the common law in Norman England, which previously required voluntary submission to it by entering a plea seeking judgment from the court.[1]
Islamic law also made major contributions to international admiralty law,[2] departing from the previous Roman and Byzantine maritime laws in several ways. These included Muslim sailors being paid a fixed wage "in advance" with an understanding that they would owe money in the event of desertion or malfeasance, in keeping with Islamic conventions in which contracts should specify "a known fee for a known duration." (In contrast, Roman and Byzantine sailors were "stakeholders in a maritime venture, inasmuch as captain and crew, with few exceptions, were paid proportional divisions of a sea venture's profit, with shares allotted by rank, only after a voyage's successful conclusion.") Muslim jurists also distinguished between "coastal navigation, or cabotage", and voyages on the "high seas", and they made shippers "liable for freight in most cases except the seizure of both a ship and its cargo". Islamic law "departed from Justinian's Digest and the Nomos Rhodion Nautikos in condemning slave jettison", and the Islamic Qirad was a precursor to the European commenda limited partnership.The "Islamic influence on the development of an international law of the sea" can thus be discerned alongside that of the Roman influence.[3]
Admiralty law was introduced into England by the French Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine while she was acting as regent for her son, King Richard the Lionheart. She had earlier established admiralty law on the island of Oleron (where it was published as the Rolls of Oleron) in her own lands (although she is often referred to in admiralty law books as "Eleanor of Guyenne"), having learned about it in the eastern Mediterranean while on a Crusade with her first husband, King Louis VII of France. In England, special admiralty courts handle all admiralty cases. These courts do not use the common law of England, but are civil law courts largely based upon the Corpus Juris Civilis of Justinian.
Admiralty courts were a prominent feature in the prelude to the American Revolution. For example, the phrase in the Declaration of Independence "For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury" refers to the practice of Parliament giving the Admiralty Courts jurisdiction to enforce The Stamp Act in the American Colonies.[4] Because the Stamp Act was unpopular, a colonial jury was unlikely to convict a colonist of its violation. However, because admiralty courts did not (as is true today) grant trial by jury, a colonist accused of violating the Stamp Act could be more easily convicted by the Crown.[citation needed]
Admiralty law became part of the law of the United States as it was gradually introduced through admiralty cases arising after the adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1789. Many American lawyers who were prominent in the American Revolution were admiralty and maritime lawyers in their private lives. Those included are Alexander Hamilton in New York and John Adams in Massachusetts.
In 1787 John Adams, who was then ambassador to France, wrote to James Madison proposing that the U.S. Constitution, then under consideration by the States, be amended to include "trial by jury in all matters of fact triable by the laws of the land [as opposed the law of admiralty] and not by the laws of Nations [i.e. not by the law of admiralty]". The result was the Seventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Alexander Hamilton and John Adams were both admiralty lawyers and Adams represented John Hancock in an admiralty case in colonial Boston involving seizure of one of Hancock's ships for violations of Customs regulations. In the more modern era, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes was an admiralty lawyer before ascending to the federal bench.Maintenance and cure[edit] The doctrine of maintenance and cure is rooted in the Article VI of the Rolls of Oleron promulgated in about 1160 A.D. The obligation to "cure" requires a shipowner to provide medical care, free of charge, to a seaman injured in the service of the ship, until the seaman has reached "maximum medical cure". The concept of "maximum medical cure" is more extensive than the concept "maximum medical improvement". The obligation to "cure" a seaman includes the obligation to provide him with medications and medical devices which improve his ability to function, even if they don't "improve" his actual condition. They may include long term treatments that permit him to continue to function well. Common examples include prostheses, wheelchairs, and pain medications.
The obligation of "maintenance" requires the shipowner to provide a seaman with his basic living expenses while he is convalescing. Once a seaman is able to work, he is expected to maintain himself. Consequently, a seaman can lose his right to maintenance, while the obligation to provide cure is ongoing.
A seaman who is required to sue a shipowner to recover maintenance and cure may also recover his attorneys fees. Vaughan v. Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527 (1962). If a shipowner's breach of its obligation to provide maintenance and cure is willful and wanton, the shipowner may be subject to punitive damages. See Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend, 557 U.S. 404 (2009)(J. Thomas).
Personal injuries to passengers[edit] Shipowners owe a duty of reasonable care to passengers (for a broad overview of this theory in law, see negligence). Consequently, passengers who are injured aboard ships may bring suit as if they had been injured ashore through the negligence of a third party. The passenger bears the burden of proving that the shipowner was negligent. While the statute of limitations is generally three years, suits against cruise lines must usually be brought within one year because of limitations contained in the passenger ticket. Notice requirements in the ticket may require a formal notice to be brought within six months of the injury. Most U.S. cruise line passenger tickets also have provisions requiring that suit to be brought in either Miami or Seattle.
Maritime liens and mortgages[edit] See also: Maritime lien Banks which loan money to purchase ships, vendors who supply ships with necessaries like fuel and stores, seamen who are due wages, and many others have a lien against the ship to guarantee payment. To enforce the lien, the ship must be arrested or seized. An action to enforce a lien against a U.S. ship must be brought in federal court and cannot be done in state court, except for under the reverse-Erie doctrine whereby state courts can apply federal law.
Salvage and treasure salvage[edit] See also: Marine salvage When property is lost at sea and rescued by another, the rescuer is entitled to claim a salvage award on the salved property. There is no "life salvage". All mariners have a duty to save the lives of others in peril without expectation of reward. Consequently salvage law applies only to the saving of property.
There are two types of salvage: contract salvage and pure salvage, which is sometimes referred to as "merit salvage". In contract salvage the owner of the property and salvor enter into a salvage contract prior to the commencement of salvage operations and the amount that the salvor is paid is determined by the contract. The most common salvage contract is called a "Lloyd's Open Form Salvage Contract".
In pure salvage, there is no contract between the owner of the goods and the salvor. The relationship is one which is implied by law. The salvor of property under pure salvage must bring his claim for salvage in court, which will award salvage based upon the "merit" of the service and the value of the salvaged property.
Pure salvage claims are divided into "high-order" and "low-order" salvage. In high-order salvage, the salvor exposes himself and his crew to the risk of injury and loss or damage to his equipment to salvage the damaged ship. Examples of high-order salvage are boarding a sinking ship in heavy weather, boarding a ship which is on fire, raising a ship or boat which has already sunk, or towing a ship which is in the surf away from the shore. Low-order salvage occurs where the salvor is exposed to little or no personal risk. Examples of low-order salvage include towing another vessel in calm seas, supplying a vessel with fuel, or pulling a vessel off a sand bar. Salvors performing high order salvage receive substantially greater salvage award than those performing low order salvage.
In both high-order and low-order salvage the amount of the salvage award is based first upon the value of the property saved. If nothing is saved, or if additional damage is done, there will be no award. The other factors to be considered are the skills of the salvor, the peril to which the salvaged property was exposed, the value of the property which was risked in effecting the salvage, the amount of time and money expended in the salvage operation etc.
A pure or merit salvage award will seldom exceed 50 percent of the value of the property salved. The exception to that rule is in the case of treasure salvage. Because sunken treasure has generally been lost for hundreds of years, while the original owner (or insurer, if the vessel was insured) continues to have an interest in it, the salvor or finder will generally get the majority of the value of the property. While sunken ships from the Spanish Main (such as Nuestra Señora de Atocha in the Florida Keys) are the most commonly thought of type of treasure salvage, other types of ships including German submarines from World War II which can hold valuable historical artifacts, American Civil War ships (the USS Maple Leaf in the St. Johns River, and the CSS Virginia in Chesapeake Bay), and sunken merchant ships (the SS Central America off Cape Hatteras) have all been the subject of treasure salvage awards.[citation needed] Due to refinements in side-scanning sonars, many ships which were previously missing are now being located and treasure salvage is now a less risky endeavor than it was in the past, although it is still highly speculative.
International conventions[edit] Prior to the mid-1970s, most international conventions concerning maritime trade and commerce originated in a private organization of maritime lawyers known as the Comité Maritime International (International Maritime Committee or CMI). Founded in 1897, the CMI was responsible for the drafting of numerous international conventions including the Hague Rules (International Convention on Bills of Lading), the Visby Amendments (amending the Hague Rules), the Salvage Convention and many others. While the CMI continues to function in an advisory capacity, many of its functions have been taken over by the International Maritime Organization, which was established by the United Nations in 1958 but did not become truly effective until about 1974.
The IMO has prepared numerous international conventions concerning maritime safety including the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), the Standards for Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW), the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (Collision Regulations or COLREGS), Maritime Pollution Regulations (MARPOL), International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue Convention (IAMSAR) and others. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) defined a treaty regarding protection of the marine environment and various maritime boundaries.
Once adopted, the international conventions are enforced by the individual nations which are signatories, either through their local Coast Guards, or through their courts.
Piracy[edit] Main article: Piracy Merchant vessels transiting areas of increased pirate activity (i.e. the Gulf of Aden, Somali Basin, Southern Red Sea and Bab-el-Mandeb straits) are advised to implement Self-Protective measures in accordance with most recent Best Management Practices agreed upon by the members of the merchant industry, and endorsed by the NATO Shipping Centre, and the Maritime Security Centre Horn-of-Africa (MSCHOA)[5]
Individual countries[edit] Common law legal systems are opposed to civil law legal systems, that prevail in Europe and trace back to old Roman and modern French Law.
Most of the common law countries (including Pakistan, Singapore, India, and many other Commonwealth of Nations countries) follow English statute and case law. India still follows many Victorian-era British statutes such as the Admiralty Court Act 1861 [24 Vict c 10]. Whilst Pakistan now has its own statute, the Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980 (Ordinance XLII of 1980), it also follows English case law. One reason for this is that the 1980 Ordinance is partly modelled on old English admiralty law, namely the Administration of Justice Act 1956. The current statute dealing with the Admiralty jurisdiction of the England and Wales High Court is the Supreme Court Act 1981, ss. 20-24, 37. The provisions in those sections are, in turn, based on the International Arrest Convention 1952. Other countries which do not follow the English statute and case laws, such as Panama, also have established well-known maritime courts which decide international cases on a regular basis.
Admiralty courts assume jurisdiction by virtue of the presence of the vessel in its territorial jurisdiction irrespective of whether the vessel is national or not and whether registered or not, and wherever the residence or domicile or their owners may be. A vessel is usually arrested by the court to retain jurisdiction. State-owned vessels are usually immune from arrest.
Canada[edit] Main article: Canadian maritime law Canadian jurisdiction in the area of "Navigation and Shipping" is vested in the Parliament of Canada by virtue of s. 91(10) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
Canada has adopted an expansive definition of its maritime law, which goes beyond traditional admiralty law. The original English admiralty jurisdiction was called "wet", as it concerned itself with things done at sea, including collisions, salvage and the work of mariners, and contracts and torts performed at sea. Canadian law has added "dry" jurisdiction to this field, which includes such matters as:
stevedoring, marine insurance, warehousing and security services, contracts of agency, and contracts of carriage. This list is not exhaustive of the subject matter.[6]
Canadian jurisdiction was originally consolidated in 1891, with subsequent expansions in 1934 following the passage of the Statute of Westminster 1931, and in 1971 with the extension to "dry" matters.[7]
Recent jurisprudence at the Supreme Court of Canada has tended to expand the maritime law power, thus overriding prior provincial laws based on the provinces' power over property and civil rights.[8]
United States[edit] Main article: United States admiralty law Jurisdiction[edit] Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution grants original jurisdiction to U.S. federal courts over admiralty and maritime matters; however, that jurisdiction is not exclusive, and most maritime cases can be heard in either state or federal courts under the "saving to suitors" clause.[9]
There are five types of cases which can only be brought in federal court:
Limitation of Shipowner's Liability, Vessel Arrests in Rem, Property arrests Quasi in Rem, Salvage cases, and Petitory and Possession Actions. The common element of those cases are that they require the court to exercise jurisdiction over maritime property. For example, in a Petitory and Possession Action, a vessel whose title is in dispute, usually between co-owners, will be put in the possession of the court until the title dispute can be resolved. In a Limitation Action the shipowner will post a bond reflecting the value of the vessel and her pending freight. A sixth category, that of prize (law), relating to claims over vessels captured during wartime, has been rendered obsolete due to changes in the laws and practices of warfare.
Aside from those five types of cases, all other maritime cases, such as claims for personal injuries, cargo damage, collisions, maritime products liability, and recreational boating accidents may be brought in either federal or state court.
From a tactical standpoint it is important to consider that in federal courts in the United States, there is generally no right to trial by jury in admiralty cases, although the Jones Act grants a jury trial to seamen suing their employers.
Maritime law is governed by a uniform three-year statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death cases. Cargo cases must be brought within two years (extended from the one-year allowance under the Hague-Visby Rules), pursuant to the adoption of the Rotterdam Rules.[10] Most major cruise ship passenger tickets have a one year statute of limitations.
Applicable law[edit] A state court hearing an admiralty or maritime case is required to apply the admiralty and maritime law, even if it conflicts with the law of the state, under a doctrine known as the "reverse-Erie doctrine". While the "Erie doctrine" requires that federal courts hearing state actions must apply substantive state law, the "reverse-Erie doctrine" requires state courts hearing admiralty cases to apply substantive federal admiralty law. However, state courts are allowed to apply state procedural law.[11] This change can be significant.
Features of U.S. admiralty law[edit] Cargo claims[edit] Claims for damage to cargo shipped in international commerce are governed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), which is the U.S. enactment of the Hague Rules. One of its key features is that a shipowner is liable for cargo damaged from "hook to hook", meaning from loading to discharge, unless it is exonerated under one of 17 exceptions to liability, such as an "act of God", the inherent nature of the goods, errors in navigation, and management of the ship.
Personal injuries to seamen[edit] Seamen injured aboard ship have three possible sources of compensation: the principle of maintenance and cure, the doctrine of unseaworthiness, and the Jones Act. The principle of maintenance and cure requires a shipowner to both pay for an injured seaman's medical treatment until maximum medical recovery (MMR) is obtained and provide basic living expenses until completion of the voyage, even if the seaman is no longer aboard ship.

Mike Clarke THE FREEMASONIC ZIONIST JEW process & control of our courts needs to be outed, EXPOSED as EVIL against CHRISTIANS... the unsuspecting public have been DUPED, but... when they discover on mass what has been happening as they slowly are and gathering in numbers WOE BETIDE THOSE SUPPORTING A ZIONIST cause!

AUGUST 7 2015 [621509]visits.
Michael Doherty on FACEBOOK
If anyone still thinks government doesn't cover up serious crimes against the people, sorry to say you need your head testing and a serious reality check up.
When you accept the reality of government crimes against the people you quickly understand they and their mechanisms of state control have NO legitimacy.
None whatsoever!
Could'nt agree more.

AUGUST 5 2015 [621435]visits.

SIR PETER MARTIN FAHY accepts delivery of his LIEN against him & the chief constable openly admitted in a newspaper interview that approximately only 60% of crimes are being investigated through a lack of resources and it is a well documented fact that white collar FRAUD is bottom of the PILE and so RIFE within the LEGAL & JEWdicial fraternaty. We reported this crime many times, if I recall it was 4, all documented on this site and I could not even get a crime reference number. It was if SOLICITORS & FRAUD was.. well... NOT worth spending any resources on, so forget it? BREACH OF DUTY

AUGUST 5 2015 [621430]visits.

MP GORDON MARSDEN in a 1 hour recorded meeting listed on this site did warn about criticising the JEWdiciary and the power they wield & what he obviously knew was unchecked. POWER like that needs to be in CHECK. AN unchecked power is NOT for the common man, but GORDON MARSDEN did recognise the injustice done to mum and though he did write some letter it fizzzled out when he realised he was getting nowhere to the point where any letter I wrote to him was IGNORED... BREACH OF CONSTITUENT DUTY.

AUGUST 4 2015 [621401]visits.
Good afternoon,
Thank you for your email, I am sorry to say that your application is incomplete, We will kindly need you to complete the forms COP1/COP1E/COP3/COP24.
The application fee is £400.00 to be made payable to HMCTS, unless you were to qualify for exemption/remission of the fee, please see our booklet ex160a.
Kind regards Andrew Conway
Court of Protection Tel No 0300 456 4600
THANK YOU for your reply.
I am in the process of updating ms clarke s application.
Once finished shortly, I will complete all the 4 forms you have advised and then will despatch the full application to you.
If I am able to make this application by post what is the correct formal address to send it to.
YOU do of course realise we have no formal address to respond, only email as we live in exile from court corruption.
I would prefer to complete the process via email due to its urgency and cost of printing and posting what will potentially be 200 pages.
The order we refer to that needs removing from my mother’s property we do consider was unnecessary at the time, therefore VOID.
Though we do qualify for FEE EXEMPT I also take note that CPR indicate that VOID orders are also EXEMPT from FEEs it may also be fair to say that the overall CRIMINAL element of FRAUD THEFT AND MALADMINISTRATION contained within the statement of truths ‘NOTARISED’ that will be in this application to be placed onto the PUBLIC RECORD are also a SUBJECT of FEE EXEMPTION.
I hope you take my points.
I make the above point because we see no reason to enter into lengthy checks that will further delay the application that is URGENT.
Also we point out that being in exile from our home land makes life extra difficult as you may appreciate.
Please advise accordingly
mike Re ann: clarke 10370284
Good afternoon,
Thank you for responding, the address to send your application and fee to is Court of Protection, Po Box 70185, First Avenue House, 42-49 High Holborn, London WC1A 9JA.
If you could mark the application for the attention of team g1.
If it is sent to me it will slow down the application process.
Kind regards Andrew Conway
Court of Protection Tel No 0300 456 4600
original letter to Judge Jackson the PREDATORY Guardian whom stalks his prey of the vulnerable yet claiming the law is completely ineccessable to those for which it is intended.

AUGUST 3 2015 [621369]visits.
That just about summed up the whole corrupt system TWADDLE!! In a facebook standoff between John Hemming and me his response to the truths put before him was TADDLE.
WELL he would say that would'nt he because he is being limited to what he can and cannot say!
Mike Clarke LIENS are alive as you know only too well and if our system will NOT take care of the poor because its in TATTERS that aint our fault and it was their DUTY under PARENS Patraie to FIX not mine... CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE IN A BREACH OF DUTY OF THE crown
Mike Clarke Over these last few years I have trying understand how why this corrupt court system is the way it is and along the way I feel I have uncovered some dark disturbing overall picture which is easy for many to disbelieve or evan call it TWADDLE but I don't think it is TWADDLE at all and if our court system is in TATTERS expecially for the poorer section where the FRAUD is UNABATED and the POLICE have no resource or inclination to investigate then you are only one step away from complete civil upheaval... our problem should have been simple to fix but because of the multi billion pound level that it is on they would rather kick it into longer grass to fester and fester it is.. I just hope more and more people start to see the system the way it really is...
Mike Clarke there is such a thing called a FAIR UNBIASED IMPARTIAL court I know they are probably in the past but I am entitled to one especially when you want to put me in prison I have not had one if I had I would not be in this position because in a real court they could not have said and done one half of what they did... I am 56, looking after mum for 20 years my worst offence would of been a motoring conviction... I am no criminal neither was Kathy Danby or Wendy Maddocks these matters are a disgrace to the UK it needs to be stopped
Mike Clarke I am saying ALL solicitors barristers & JUDGES are in the BAR that is CROWN operated and our case is against the crown so how can you removed the BIAS in court WHICH IS UNLAWFUL without a JURY??? YOU CAN'T... I will not submit to a BIASED court that is colluding and conspiring to defraud where a SOLICITOR & BARRISTERs 1st duty is TO the court NOT ME or YOU .... THIS BIAS does not exist in a JURY COURT and add to it ALLEGATIONS of THEFT & FRAUD by the CROWN where or how can you get the JUSTICE in crown operated environment IMPOSSIBLE & OBVIOUS so why not submit to a JURY... OBVIOUS again because THE CROWN knows it will lose so then you left with TYRANNICAL JUDGES whom seem to think they OWN the LAW and are now above it !!!!
Mike Clarke JUDGES were never above the LAW so why NOW.... because we have ALLOWED it.
Mike Clarke Hence you have innocent people being thrown into prisons and then no doubt the disabled defenceless mother gets thrown into a care home where they then start to ASSET STRIP.. sound unbelievable !! THIS IS WHAT IS GOING ON
Mike Clarke ALL John talks about is compromise GIVE ME ONE good GOD DAMN reason why I should compromise my integrity when I can clearly see whats wrong WHERE the crown is committing FRAUD
Mike Clarke I SERVED UPON BENT SOLICITORS a common law commercial lien claim because the STATUTE CROWN system had failed my mother and me... because the court system is in TATTERS because the CROWN cannot judge the CROWN.... BIAS .. it has to be a JURY .. there is nothing wrong in a commercial lien if its TRUE ... if its NOT the writer commits perjury and can go to prison .. ALL I WROTE is the truth it just needs 12 peers to agree AND a JUDGE has no RIGHT to interfere
PMSL to all them comments but seriously folks read the history on this all I want is answers.. I've asked.. and I've asked but John won't go there.. he claims to help provide JUSTICE but ain't seen any yet for my 75 year old mother whom has been the subject of government backed FRAUD facilitated by a bent JEWdiciary.. and NO we're not MAD.. AS WE ARE NOT ALONE there are plenty more... IT give's me no pleasure to take this step but I'M NO CRIMINAL and NEITHER is my MOTHER we are just VICTIMS that want answers from those whom claim to have them... JOHN claims I broke the LAW OF THE LAND.. that's slander it ain't true and further more he attempts to MIX statute maritime law with COMMON laws of the land and they are completely different species... SHAME ON JOHN.. if they are ALL linked together in HARMONY then WHY OH WHY will he NOT answer the TOP question at the beginning of this thread because if the MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 section 5 is a so called LAW OF THE LAND then why did these JUDGES not take this into account and why did they not allow representation and why did they refuse a JURY court and WHY WASS IT NOT PUBLISHED??? Many many many other questions to blow this case out of the WATER but JOHN I believe is either PART of THE PROBLEM or will he be PART OF THE SOLUTION but do takes seriously a commercial LIEN they are attachable to property as a judgement and they do not need a COURT. xx

AUGUST 2 2015 [621325]visits.
I require that you bear in mind John that the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Section 5 provides protection for carers from any civil or criminal liability in connection with the care of a PATIENT under the PARENs PATRIAE ie state control of persons property and financial affairs under THE COURT of PROTECTION or OFFICE of THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN. THERE are lots of laws that have been broken in this case none of which have I broken ANY. CONSIDER yourself hereby served and you now have 14 days to begin your responses failing which your attachment to the COMMERCIAL LIEN will be perfected.

AUGUST 2 2015 [621316]visits.

AUG 1 2015 [621314]visits.

JULY 31 2015 [621288]visits.
1215 1216 1217 1297 & BILL OF RIGHTS 1688
John if the MAGNA CARTA 1297 still stands as you say and the section relating to no man be imprisoned without his peers to judge how can I have been the victim of prison/exile without such peer judgement IS THIS NOT TREASON by a NOMINATED court of protection JUDGE judging in his own cause when all our allegations are about the fraud theft and mal administration connected to the state intervened PARENs PATRIAE take over of mums financial and property affairs, which having been informed of such FRAUD were duty bound to automatically correct and compensate. IT WAS NOT ME or MY MOTHERS job to do this it was the CROWNS.

JULY 31 2015 [621275]visits.

MICHAEL ANDREW GOVE now has 14 days to respond, which as a rule, like he's predecessors usually CAN NOT BE BOTHERED... there is a sense of COULD NOT GIVE A DAMN by these people where there is NO ACCOUNTABILITY thus the common man has a duty to bring this about &.. MAKE THEM ACCOUNTABLE.. the statute route has and is A FAILURE for a multitude of reasons.. and the LIEN appears to be the main route as far as I am concerned. ADDITIONALLY my mother was fraudulently placed under their PARENs PATIAE control and once made fully aware of the theft fraud and mal administration had a duty to protect and compensate automatically.. it's NOT for me or her to do this.. ALL they have done is SWEEP it under the carpet which they are doing to MILLIONS!!
A lien can be created on any real estate by registering your judgment with the land records office in the county in which the debtor's real state is located. There's no fee to post your case to local lawyers. Learn more about: Real Estate Lien Lawyers.

JULY 31 2015 [621270]visits.
Towards the end of last year, Brian Leveson, the same Brian Leveson who worked so hard to remove the last vestiges of freedom of the press, was tasked with working out how to make Britain's criminal courts "more efficient". In this age of austerity, the cost is just too high. In January this year, his report, commissioned by the Lord Chief Justice, recommended:
• more use of technology to allow "remote hearings"
• "tighter case management" by judges, including, in appropriate cases, the provision of timetables for evidence and speeches
• more "high-quality equipment" in courts to ensure footage from police body-worn cameras can be shown
• "flexible opening hours" in magistrates' courts to accommodate those who cannot attend during normal working hours
• contracts requiring "greater efficiency" from those who deliver prisoners to courts, to avoid delays
And in Part 10, he recommended that the right of a defendant to choose trail by jury be removed.
At present, the Crown Prosecution Service does all it can to effectively bribe defendants into consenting to a non-jury trial by offering lower potential sentences. Leveson's plan would see even this choice removed.
Today the second part of the court review process was announced. The Lord Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls, as Head of Civil Justice, have asked Lord Justice Briggs to carry out an "urgent review" of the structure of the courts which deliver civil justice.
Assisted by a small team, and supported by the Civil Judicial Engagement Group in an advisory capacity, Briggs will look at the "overall structure of civil justice", as well as "the relationship of those courts with the Family Court and with the various tribunals."
He has until the end of the year to publish an interim report. It is unclear what he can recommend which could do more damage than has already been done, however.
With access to civil courts effectively blocked to members of the pubic who wish to sit in on cases to "see justice being done", with more and more cases being heard in secret, with the civil procedure rules being run roughshod over and with more and more court buildings being closed outright, Britain's civil justice service is already in tatters.
Briggs will be "seeking a wide range of views". It is not yet clear whether this will be a public consultation.
According to my sources he is seeking views so here is his;; FAO LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS

JULY 30 2015 [621250]visits.


JULY 30 2015 [621245]visits.

PRIME MINISTERs have a duty to the public its what we pay them for. To be forced into EXILE is a FAILURE on his part in the 1st instance.

JULY 30 2015 [621245]visits.

When a crime is reported but not acted upon there is a breach of duty.

JULY 30 2015 [621230]visits.

WHEN duty calls for your constituent MP to respond and he does not then he must pay the price of breach of duty.

JULY 29 2015 [621220]visits.

Secretarys of state for justice have a habit of not responding to correspondence and MICHAEL GOVE is no different so how will he feel about being attached to a commercial lien for £1 million.

JULY 28 2015 [621185]visits.

Is fast becoming a choice worth considering

JULY 27 2015 [621145]visits.

THE EMAIL exchange so far here
COP1 asked for
attached full application

JULY 26 2015 [621122]visits.
with your own story of corruption from we are that have been persecuted by treasonous JUDGES whom with impunity are breaking the common laws of our land that I wrote to you about in 2010.. our persecution and denial of due process only receiving JEW process represents GENOCIDE cleansing of MONEY PROPERTY & RIGHTS to JUSTICE to favour a JEWISH ruling ELITE... there is a growing faster than you think rebellion of varying quarters up and down GREAT BRITAIN that I urge you to take with serious concern for your own long term well being.
The CORRUPTION WITHIN OUR COURTS NOT YOURS IS NOW RAMPANT. mike & ann Clarke UKREFUGEES EXILED from the CORRUPTION you are presiding over,.. that is brimming to overfull especially exuding from the COURT OF PROTECTION/OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN

JULY 24 2015 [621076]visits.
What on earth is going on here? Norman Scarth, Associate & Hon. Sec. of The Article 6 Group,
Mr Scarth
Further to your email below, please note that the case for Mr Hofschroer has only been taken out of the list for Monday 27th today. The new date fixed for this trial is now the 4th Janaury 2015
(Janaury!!! 2015???) and is listed to be heard at Teeside Crown Court. The reason the case has been put back is following an application to adjourn by the Defence due to issues with reports required, unavailability of Counsel and the increase in length of the trial. There are 39 charges of Making Indecent photographs of a child. The firm representating Mr Hofschroer is Peace Legal of Barnsley Road, Wombwell, Barnsley.
Regards Chantal Hooson Operational Team Leader York Crown Court

JULY 24 2015 [621075]visits.
I always find it astounding that inadequacy of security in the courts has existed for hundreds of years, and yet the Ministry of Justice only now wakes up. Will it be sufficient to stop the rampant fraud and financial abuse imposed on those who cannot protect themselves, or will the Ministry, as usual, leave glaring loopholes for crime and abuse to take place?
My aunt was defrauded through the Public Guardian and Court of Protection, and the Mental Health Act 1983 was invoked to do it, with the signature of ONLY ONE SOCIAL WORKER AND NOT ONE DOCTOR. How can this be right? Despite all my efforts, the matter has been covered up.
I still want to see justice, but am totally ignored by the establishment which, as everyone knows, is their modus operandi that also includes deleting emails without reading them, and desperately flailing around in attempts discontinue the Freedom of Information Act and shut down freedom of speech on the internet.
Justice Minister, Simon Hughes, expressed to me previously that there was no intention of closing up loopholes. Another loophole that has been pointed out to the Ministry of Justice, over and over again, is the lack of serial numbers for audit purposes on Court of Protection Certificates of Mental Capacity COP3. Simon Hughes clearly stated, in writing, that the Ministry of Justice had no intention of addressing this matter. Chris Grayling was backing him up.
Our conclusion is that the courts have a sinister reason for inviting fraud through the use of the Court of Protection, and inadequate audits, as it has been going on since its inception, and the courts willingly allow it.
My guess is that the new measures will not go far enough to stop the organised crime taking place under the smoke screen of the Court of Protection and other courts, and that the ongoing enablement is absolutely deliberate.
This court is an ideal tool for money laundering as there is virtually no supervision and, despite the announcement, we doubt that the new measures will be thorough or sufficient. to stop the criminal activity and exploitation of Britain's most vulnerable people.
Please note, Mr. Gove, uncomfortable emails addressed to "general.queries" are deleted without being read.
Jean James

JULY 24 2015 [621072]visits.

JULY 24 2015 [621055]visits.

WE are in the process of the same to gain a grand jury to ascertain true LAW IN THE LAST 3 HOURS The Crawfords have taken back possesion of their home on the above parerwork and are currently IN POSSESSION backed with PEOPLE POWER Time of publication 5pm UK TIME 24th July 2015

UPDATE:26th July 2015
Craig Crawford feeling pained
So I was arrested at like 5am Saturday morning.. For throwing a fleece blanket up onto MY PARENTS roof. And as we all know the police had no paperwprk to prove it wasn't theirs.. Where as I did...
I told the police I feared the people.on the roof were getting too cold and hungry and may fall off. We refused to leave them as we were the only witnesses left there and the only reason why we were still there is because i positioned my car in a point where they could be seen! And couldn't move us!!!
The police stood infront of the car for quite a while and blocked our view purposely. (so there were no witnesses when they tried to push them down from underneath in the loft space)
They didn't care if they fell, and had no duty of care to those brave souls! So we made it our mission to get food and dry warm clothing to them...
When they arrested us..for throwing up food and normal, non dangerous items... I asked what for..? The response was "errrr I dunno yet..(said Constable Craig pole) I'll think of something in a minute" they then told me it was conspiracy to commit violence???????
They didn't even know my name when this alleged offence was said to me.. So how the he'll can they pull that one out??
I was there ALL day, peacefully they could've grabbed me at any time.. But throwing a blanket with food in, ontop of a roof was committing conspiracy to commit violence??? And without even knowing who I was (they were asking my name)
Well, anyways. They have taken my phones.. Which has criminal evidence on from the second of July, business contacts and I'll need it for general use... There was a law passed that if someone stole a mobile phone.. They could get up to five years (if I remember) as it's classed as a life line..
And theyve been made aware of that there's criminal evidence on.. And I also told them I do not consent to them taking them...
A little short of 24 hours I was released... Now.. This is even weirder.. I was charged with breaking the skylight window... Criminal damage. And correct me of I'm wrong.. And unless I can fucking levitate and/or teleport... I didn't I even go near that window!!! Not even close!!
Someone was apparently assaulted.. Inside the house too... Which perhaps is where the alleged original violence reference was included... And forgive me if I'm wrong.. But the people were in the LOFT. Where it was only them.. How did ANYONE manage to pass through the loft floorboards and the ceiling plaster boards below somehow passing through solid objects to assault someone in there????
Everyone's super heroes to me in this.. But seriously... How did they grace us with super hero powers???
Now.. It's going to a criminal court... Let's see these fuckers produce the actual evidence to say that my parents don't own the house. WHICH THEU FAILED TO DO ON THE DAY!! Confirming out suspicions!
I feel terrible for the brave supporters who showed heart, resilience and passion for the greater Cause!! Everyone supoorting were 1100000 times more human than those robots who assaulted us.
Here's a twist.. NO ONE CAN BE DONE WITH BURGLARY OR TRESSPASS...WHY???? Because the police say that because my parents name is still on the bloody land registry deed!!!!
Love to everyone who's been supporting this movement! Again, we've proven that the police aren't here for us.. Only for corporations in this Case! This is growing bigger and bigger. We must push on and ensure this doesn't happen in the future for others. Even if they're shitting on our human rights!
I still feel terrible for the super six who are still in custody. We're working on getting them help ASAP!!
Bless them! Thanks for your support everyone! Now it's criminal.. Let's take it to these fuckers!!!! X

JULY 23 2015 [621033]visits.

The problem we have is that this is a huge cover up, it has spanned many decades, and it is not only still being covered up but it is still happening, on an unbelievable scale... That is why names are only coming out when it's too late, (like Savile/Brittan/Cyril Smith). This gives us the impression that the investigation is honest and genuine, but actually it goes on to protect the current paedophiles still operating in parliament and British Establishment. David Cameron knows everything, and the Royal family are intimately involved, investigate them. The newspapers serve to distract us and serve them, as do the media networks on TV and radio so you simply cannot trust the information that comes from those sources. Start searching the internet for the information, you kind of have to be the investigator yourself to decide what you really think is happening, but there are so many shocking stories involving MPs, members of the Royal family, corporate bosses, school teachers and many others, it does paint a grim picture of our ruling establishment.

JULY 22 2015 [621022]visits.

JULY 16 2015 [620875]visits.

High Treason
Conduct comprising a breach of allegiance owed to the sovereign or the state.
The police and courts have been knobbled giving these traitors a free rein. The chief constables neutered. Injustice the norm.
We have and are being sold down the river by the collaborator ruling class. Many of them child abusers of the worst sort. The media especially the BBC are complicit. They are “in it together”.
These gimp slaves of the EU and globalism need to be ousted.
Banks and politicians, subversive agents of foreign powers are acting beyond their authority wilfully sabotaging and looting the UK without restriction on their treasonous and criminal activites by those invested with the powers to defend our nation, our customs our constitution and our rights and freedoms are being removed.
A totallitarian panopticon police state prison far worse than the Soviet East Germany is being erected around us.
This must be reversed unless of course you prefer living in an vassal slave state of the EU dictatorship.
The traitors must be rounded up and served a fitting punishment.
That is down to you men and women of England inaction will furnish our national obituary or will you band together to defend your children, yourselves and our nation from tyranny.
Are you that gutless that you will submissivly comply with the criminal designs of a jackbooted EU state, Hitlers dream come true ?
Will you stand firm with your countrymen and take our nation back ?

JULY 15 2015 [620840]visits.
He sits there with his hammer and wig
About us parents he don’t give a frig
He listens to the professional's lies
Which sever all our family ties
While we’re in court us parents weep
The judge gets bored and falls asleep
We can never seem to have our say
All he does is take our babies away
I hate social services with all contempt
From their lies and evil acts no one is exempt
All they want is kids in care
To make our family homes empty and bare
He sits there with his hammer and wig
In reality the judge don’t give a frig

JULY 14 2015 [620830]visits.

Cambridgeshire County Council leader Steve Count says its time for councillors and officers to say if they are a freemason.
“One area of concern I have seen expressed on social media and personally to me is the secrecy supposedly surrounding membership of the freemasons,” he said.
“As leader of a county council I believe the trust of the electorate is important not just for me but for the whole political system.”
Cllr Count will put a motion to next Tuesday’s full council meeting calling for the register of interests to reflect membership of a lodge. He also wants councillors and officers to declare if their wives or partners – including those in a civil partnership- belong to the freemasons.
He said: “The freemasons themselves encourage openness and transparency. However simply passing on this knowledge on its own has does little to allay the electorate’s fears, whether real or unjustified.
“I have therefore decided a more proactive approach to increase transparency would be a good idea”
There are 250,000 freemasons belonging to 8,000 lodges throughout England and Wales, and districts overseas, said Cllr Count.
From 2004 to 2012 councillors were obliged to declare freemason membership but the rules changed when the Standards Board of England gave way to a lighter code of conduct regime governing their behaviour.
Now he wants membership to be declared once again and said he was “sure it will gain support from all quarters, both members and non members of that society”.
He added: “I am not one myself but have spoken to many people who are and see no reason to make a secret of the fact.”
YES and based on the whole picture this website paints of the corrupt Judiciary... if a councillor can clearly see the need then why not JUDGES along with any links to the JEWISH sector.

JULY 14 2015 [620817]visits.


JULY 14 2015 [620790]visits.

DUE PROCESS has been replaced by JEW process. A criminal foreign power has infiltrated all walks of our establishment and the root of the satanic evil is money and satanic worship. THE evil is astounding and its operating from within our own courts of common law that they have hijacked with impunity. WATCH this video and see the BLATANT disregard of common law stating YOU HAVE NO MERIT. This is exactly what these so called JUDGES have been doing to me and my mum forced into EXILE from the cover up of THEFT FRAUD & MAL ADMINISTRATION of her financial and property affairs that under THE CROWNS so called PARENS PATRAE were duty bound to protect!!

JULY 11 2015 [620745]visits.

JULY 11 2015 [620736]visits.

Dear UK Refugees
Posted on July 11, 2015 by Sabine Kurjo McNeill From Veteran Victim turned Starfighter and Super McKenzie Friend Norman Scarth:
Whistleblower Peter Hofschroer, whom I know personally, is to appear in York Crown Court on 27th July 2015, for the start of his Kangaroo Court trial . It is listed as likely to take a week.
This is a most terrible stitch-up!
The ONLY chance Peter has is to tell the jury AND TO KEEP HAMMERING AWAY AT IT that it is to silence his whistle-blowing about corruption, child abuse, elder abuse & more, by people in high places in what Peter calls Jimmy Savile Country .
Whether he has found a defence lawyer who will do that, & whether the judge will ALLOW it, is doubtful.
I speak from experience. At my own secret trial in 2001, Judge David Ronald Bentley had me (then aged 75) literally dragged & thrown down back down the cells when I tried to present my defence (I was denied a lawyer) & complain at his gross misconduct.
He did this not once BUT THREE TIMES!
Unfortunately, being effectively in secret, there was hardly anyone there to see what was being done to me.
Peter s chance will be improved if you can be there in your thousands to see what goes on. The British Constitution Group had about 700 people turn up at Birkenhead County Court on 3rd March(?) 2011, when they arrested the judge. This is INFINITELY more important.
Please be there if you possibly can! (Unfortunately, for reasons most of you know of, I cannot be there myself).
Norman Scarth
- Forwarded message - From: jj Date: 9 July 2015 at 15:07 Subject: Fwd: RESPONSE NEEDED BOOTS ON THE GROUND Friends, please help. This is a very important case and it is hoped that police corruption will be publicly exposed and witnessed by hundreds.
Please circulate this widely and plan to attend in support of Peter and his elderly mother, Barbara.
Guy, would it be possible, please, for your network to organise a RESPONSE TEAM to attend court in York?
Peter Hofschroer, an author and historian of prominence, has been falsely accused of having child pornography on his computer. By all accounts, these files were planted there. The initial charge stated that 6969 images were found on his computer.
Now I don t want to appear crude but, as you may know 69 is slang for a particular type of sex act, and I think someone at North Yorkshire Police thinks this is funny, and the whole thing is a set up.
The background is that Peter and his parents were being threatened and abused by a social worker (his brother, Robert). Police failed to act and York failed to safeguard the vulnerable people.
North Yorkshire Police appear to be working in tandem with both the council and the offender, Robert. They have been persecuting Peter and his mother for about eight years now. A civilian working inside the police force raised an international arrest warrant for kidnap when Peter took his mother to his home in Austria as a place of safety. It was later cancelled after Peter exposed the worker.
There have been ongoing events, and finally Peter decided to take out a private prosecution against North Yorkshire Police. Only minutes before the case was to proceed, North Yorkshire police arrested him, in December 2014, on the steps of the court room. He has been in prison without bail ever since.
He stands accused of having indecent images of children on his computer, which he did not have access to for many years. This computer had been left in the mother s home when Peter and his mother fled the physical threats of his brother, Robert. At one point, the brother, Robert, reported to police that there had been a break in but no police attended. It was a little while after this so called break in that police say they discovered the porn. We most definitely believe he has been framed because he has been publicly exposing the case and talking about corruption. Furthermore, two other citizen journalists and Peter are the subject of a civil court case against them, brought by North Yorkshire Police and Julia Mulligan, Police Commissioner, in order to silence them. There are a total of nine individual plaintiffs included in the action, many of whom have never worked for police, and they are using police resources and public monies to take action to silence people who expose corruption. It is a civil action for harassment. Harassment is criminal but the CPS want nothing to do with it, so they are trying the civil route in order to frighten people for speaking out about corruption. They are doing it with public monies.
Peter is languishing in prison and has had virtually no visitors. He badly needs to have the courtroom filled to the brim when his court case re indecent images comes up on July 27.
We have no doubt in our minds that he has been framed, and we want to see him set free. They want to keep him in prison so that he cannot pursue his private prosecution case against them.
I beg you to mobilize your response team to attend the case, which is expected to last five days. We need the corrupt ones to know that Peter has lots of support and witnesses to the trial.
Please help. Peter s name is all over the internet, and his website regarding all the abuse he has suffered is THE ABUSE OF GRANDMA B. People can Google it, and they will see the bullying and crime that his now 87 year old mother and himself have suffered at the hands of corrupt entities in |North Yorkshire.
I am circulating this email far and wide, in the hope that everyone will join forces. Your group has a strong response history, and we need their help badly. By way of cc, I am also appealing directly to other groups and individuals.
PLEASE HELP. This is a very important case regarding police corruption. If we can fill the courtroom and more on the street, so much the better. The court house is not far from the railway station.
Regina v Hofschroer July 27 Aug 1/2015 10.00 a.m. York Crown Court Courthouse Address: The Castle, York, North Yorkshire YO1 9WZ Phone:01904 645121
Facebook His own blog:
Related articles

JULY 9 2015 [620684]visits.
NOTE: David Cameron and ALL his Jewish Friends of Israel in the UK are TRAITORS, and have HIJACKED Magna Carta, the Law of the Land, and are operating Satanic Talmudic Jewish Courts without Juries to Asset-Strip us Christians, which is High Treason. -
On 07/07/2015, in Court 37 of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court, I, Patrick Cullinane, and numerous other members of the public, witnessed TWO separate submissions of High Treason against David Cameron that DEMANDED Mr 'Justice' Andrew Edis to put David Cameron and Others before, A Common Law Jury Trial, for Abuse of Public Office and violating the Constitutional Law of the Land by denying, We the People, a Trial by OUR Peers in our Courts in the UK. - Cameron's gatekeeper, Mr 'Justice' Andrew Edis, said BOTH submissions had "NO MERIT" and REFUSED to put his JUDGEMENT in WRITING: This is further incontrovertible evidence of how the FRIENDS OF ISRAEL have HIJACKED the Rule of Law and the JEWdicial System in he UK with the following LIES and PROPOGANDA of David Cameron, as if, We the People, have Trial by Jury in the UK: -
Urging everyone in Britain to take pride in Magna Carta, Mr Cameron went on to say: 'Its remaining copies may be faded, but its principles shine as brightly as ever in every courtroom and every classroom from palace to Parliament to parish church.
'Liberty, justice, democracy, the rule of law - we hold these things dear and we should hold them even dearer for the fact that they took shape right here, on the banks of the Thames.
'So on this historic day, let's pledge to keep those principles alight. Let's keep Magna Carta alive.
'Because as those barons showed, all those years ago, what we do today will shape the world for many, many years to come.'
The Queen did not give a speech but wrote a foreword to the official programme for the celebration, in her role as patron of the Magna Carta Trust.
She said: 'The story of the British Monarchy is intertwined with that of Runnymede and Magna Carta.'
She added: 'The values of Magna Carta were not just important to the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth, but across the world. Its principles are significant and enduring.'
Among the guests was US Attorney General Loretta Lynch who a few weeks ago was the public face of America's corruption case against Fifa officials.
She said: 'This social contract between a monarch and his people codified, however imperfectly, notions that would one day stand at the heart of our own system of justice. The idea that no power is unconditional and no rule is absolute.'
Ms Lynch added: 'For those that drafted the US Constitution, the significance of Magna Carta was clear - it's influence helped shape a political system that enshrines separation of powers, due process and the rule of law.'

JULY 9 2015 [620671]visits.

JULY 9 2015 [620650]visits.

Council TAX bills from Blackpool council have now started arriving at mums home where she is in no position to pay from the CROWNs inability to correct injustice and compensate for the fraud, theft and maladministration of her financial affairs under the "so-called" PARENS PATRAE of state intervened Court of Protection governance of financial affairs that has also now led to exile!

It is with deep regret that we are forced to withhold council tax payments because of the mal administration of JUSTICE to Mrs Clarke and where part of her council tax is being received by the crown whom is conducting a persecution upon Mrs Clarke.

Respectfully we advise the council for a 2nd time about the injustices suffered via this website and on this concrete basis REFUSE TO PAY

copy of letter to council

& here is more UK fraud to demonstrate CORRUPTION

JULY 8 2015 [620620]visits.

Its only a matter of time before REAL JUSTICE breaks through because the game is up on injustice... too many people are clearly seeing right through the cracks of this fraud.. not just cracks but gaping holes.
If you want an insight to what's going on in our, yes OUR courts this video gets to the heart of it ...SHARE IT FAR AND WIDE its your future...

JULY 7 2015 [620602]visits.

According to the ADL poll, 90 percent of Greeks agreed with the statement that “Jews have too much power in the business world” and 85 percent agreed “Jews have too much power in international finance markets.”

JUNE 25 2015 [620357]visits.

'Lord' Neuberger has shown that he knows nothing whatsoever about Magna Carta the Constitutional Law of the Land which guarantees, We the People, Due Process via Trial by OUR Peers for EVERY case Civil, Criminal and Fiscal:
The evidence is, 'Lord' Neuberger and TWELVE of his fellow High Court 'Judges' CONSPIRED and DEFRAUDED me of Home and Possessions by denying me my Constitutional Common Law Rights to Due Process via a Trial by my Peers: = Article 39 of Magna Carta the Law of the Land: See the Guardian newspaper, by Phillip Inman, "This man was right all along"…/10/tax.scamsandfraud
It makes me sick to see a Jewish LAWBREAKER like David Neuberger selected to mark the 800th anniversary of the English Magna Carta the Great Charter, when he is a Foreign Power, operating courts in the UK without Juries, which is High Treason.
Note all the JEWS here again in POWERFUL positions tampering with our Constitutional Common Law of the Land, in UNISON, to Racketeer, Murder, Asset Strip, Steal Babies and Extortion with impunity to date, as these CRIMINALS have HIJACKED our Law of the Land.
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK's COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.
Patrick Cullinane There is no BIGGER meddler and fraudster than 'Lord' Neuberger, as he and his fellow JEWS have CONSPIRED and HIJACKED the Law of the Land, and replaced it with SATANIC TALMUDIC LAW where the likes of Patrick Cullinane and MILLIONS of others have NO rights to PROPERTY, Due Process or Justice, which is High Treason and a Hanging Offence: -
According to the old laws of England, which are still in force, many current British politicians qualify for hanging and their laws are null and void HIGH TREASON.
Published on 18 Jun 2015
The attached are the TWO documents that we tried to put before a Motion Judge in Court 37 yesterday, 15 June 2015. - As you witnessed; the door to Court 37 was LOCKED, with court staff standing behind the door preventing us from entering the court to get RELIEF:
I DEMANDED that I see a Judge in Court and serve him personally with my documents. However, the Court Manager, Mr Tim Green, and the court staff insisted that, Mr Justice Supperstone, wanted to READ my application / submission behind closed doors FIRST. – They endeavoured to assure us that this was ‘normal procedure’, to which I told them; this was UNLAWFUL. We DEMANDED to see the written Procedure, to no avail.
After over an HOUR of arguing with Court Staff of wanting to see a Judge in person in Court 37; the Head of Security, Steve Burrows, suggested that I give the documents to Mr Justice Supperstone’s Clerk and she will take them to the Judge to read. With no other way forward, I handed the documents to Mr Justice Supperstone’s Clerk and waited outside the LOCKED DOOR of Court 37:
About 25 minutes later, Mr Tim Green returned with my documents saying, the Judge is REFUSING to see you in Court. I then demanded Mr Green to explain why, and he said, Mr Justice Supperstone said he had NO JURISDICTION to deal with this. I demanded that, I wanted this in writing, in the form of a Court Judgement; to which Mr Green replied, YOU WILL NOT BE GETTING THIS.
Therefore, our Public Servants perverted the course of justice yesterday, as Court 37 is supposed to be OPEN to the People – and cannot close if there are People to be dealt with.
We immediately rang the Police Emergency Service number 999 and demanded the Police to arrest the Judge for the crimes of perverting the course of justice and High Treason. – The Police failed in their DUTY to arrest, Mr Justice Supperstone, for his blatant CRIMES against the Rule of Law: = Magna Carta the Law of the Land.
We will be back, in larger numbers next time, and NO Court Staff will be getting my documents THIS TIME – ONLY the JUDGE!
Best regards always brothers, and thanks for your support in these crucial matters to RESTORE the Law of the Land in the UK.
God Bless you all, and keep up the good work. Amen.
Patrick Cullinane.

JUNE 17 2015 [620162]visits.

Class Action under - MAGNA CARTA 1215 for Crimes against Humanity on 15 June 2015 Patrick Cullinane Add to contacts Attachment 14:57 [Keep this message at the top of your inbox] Documents To: John Paterson -v- ISRAELI HIJACK OF MAGNA CARTA 1215, Anthony Duckmanton - Video Man, Julian Coulter -v- ISRAELI HIJACK OF MAGNA CARTA 1215, Cc: Michael Vaughan & Family -v- THE ZIONIST CORRUPTION OF ÉIRE patrick.cullinane Active View 2 attachments (total 1492.3 KB) Click for Options Affidavit of Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer - Dated 15 June 2015.doc Click for Options Class Action under - MAGNA CARTA 1215 for Crimes against Humanity on 15 ....doc Download all as zip Save all to OneDrive
Dear John, Tony, Julian and Steve Burrows,
The attached are the TWO documents that we tried to put before a Motion Judge in Court 37 yesterday, 15 June 2015. - As you witnessed; the door to Court 37 was LOCKED, with court staff standing behind the door preventing us from entering the court to get RELIEF:
I DEMANDED that I see a Judge in Court and serve him personally with my documents. However, the Court Manager, Mr Tim Green, and the court staff insisted that, Mr Justice Supperstone, wanted to READ my application / submission behind closed doors FIRST. – They endeavoured to assure us that this was ‘normal procedure’, to which I told them; this was UNLAWFUL. We DEMANDED to see the written Procedure, to no avail.
After over an HOUR of arguing with Court Staff of wanting to see a Judge in person in Court 37; the Head of Security, Steve Burrows, suggested that I give the documents to Mr Justice Supperstone’s Clerk and she will take them to the Judge to read. With no other way forward, I handed the documents to Mr Justice Supperstone’s Clerk and waited outside the LOCKED DOOR of Court 37:
About 25 minutes later, Mr Tim Green returned with my documents saying, the Judge is REFUSING to see you in Court. I then demanded Mr Green to explain why, and he said, Mr Justice Supperstone said he had NO JURISDICTION to deal with this. I demanded that, I wanted this in writing, in the form of a Court Judgement; to which Mr Green replied, YOU WILL NOT BE GETTING THIS.
Therefore, our Public Servants perverted the course of justice yesterday, as Court 37 is supposed to be OPEN to the People – and cannot close if there are People to be dealt with.
We immediately rang the Police Emergency Service number 999 and demanded the Police to arrest the Judge for the crimes of perverting the course of justice and High Treason. – The Police failed in their DUTY to arrest, Mr Justice Supperstone, for his blatant CRIMES against the Rule of Law: = Magna Carta the Law of the Land.
We will be back, in larger numbers next time, and NO Court Staff will be getting my documents THIS TIME – ONLY the JUDGE!
Best regards always brothers, and thanks for your support in these crucial matters to RESTORE the Law of the Land in the UK.
God Bless you all, and keep up the good work. Amen.

JUNE 14 2015 [620100]visits.

JUNE 13 2015 [620077]visits.

My commercial lien served upon 7 UK JUDGES comes into perfection on the 800th anniversary of the MAGNA CARTA 1215 this coming MONDAY... after this has took hold I intend to then add to it our MP GORDON MARSDEN - Chief Constable of MANCHESTER PETER FAHY - Minister for Justice MICHAEL GOVE - then the man himself .. DAVID CONMORAN @ £1million each bringing the total jointly and severally liable persons of 62 indebted for £20 million that I am then going to file the claim in court with the LIEN STATEMENT of truth/DEBT as the core evidence & should I encounter any resistance or obstruction by court staff I will then FORM a GRAND JURY court to ascertain my rights for a common law court case to answer.
As Lord Denning put it, Magna Carta 1215 was “the greatest constitutional document of all time, the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot”.

JUNE 3 2015 [619918]visits.
Fighting to show the truth and expose the deception.
Brian Gerrish
I was very sad to hear about John Harris. He had been in Devon for a while and several good people had been helping him through a difficult period. All seemed well, his book had been published, and then something unpredictable. We are waiting for his family to decide on arrangements but hopefully we can do something to remember John for all the good work he did.
I remember John calling me one Saturday morning many years ago. We hit it off and he travelled to Plymouth to see us in the UKColumn office. What a conversation that was. We helped him with his first ever talk at Totnes to an audience of 17 and then whoosh he was off, and the audience just got bigger and bigger.
John was spot on with his analysis of the corruption of our law, courts and State. as well as the use of legalese. We have all learned much from him.
We will miss him.

JUNE 2 2015 [619877]visits.

JUNE 1 2015 [619875]visits.
Boy Taken Into Care Over Parents Smoking
A judge says the two-year-old should be adopted after a health visitor found he lived in the smokiest house she had ever seen.

MAY 31 2015 [619846]visits.

MAY 31 2015 [619840]visits.

Published on 16 Apr 2015
On 28th February 2015 the British Constitution Group resurrected Grand Juries as a mechanism to indict alleged criminals, especially those working in or for the government, whom appear to have enjoyed official or unofficial immunity to prosecution.
Grand Juries were stopped by the British government in 1933 however, since Grand Juries are a Common Law Right, the remedy cannot be taken away by an Act of Parliament.
Four Grand Juries were convened at Telford. Three returned a case to answer, the fourth was unable to return due to a procedural issue which actually helped to illustrate that the formal and correct process was used, resulting in one jury failing.
This splendid video by John explains the legislation and due process for British Grand Juries.
Now it is time for you to convene your own and prosecute any public official (servant) who has committed a crime against people, property or the state itself.
The CPS CANNOT intervene. I repeat the CPS CANNOT intervene. This is a critical difference to private and police prosecutions which can be stopped, like in the example today: "Labour's Janner will not be charged over alleged child abuse: Prosecutors say it is not in public interest to put peer, 86, on trial"
Just because the CPS or some other powerful entity has stopped it is now irrelevant - the people can convene their own Grand Jury to bypass the CPS and take it directly to the Old Bailey.
WE are looking to FORM ONE.

MAY 29 2015 [619805]visits.



MAY 24 2015 [619660]visits.
And seeing as NORMAN SCARTH seems to act like he fought WW2 single handed I had to lay praise on the memory of the one person whom probably saved NORMAN SCARTHs life ALAN TURING whom was a BUM BOY that was persecuted for that by authorities that could not tolerate his choice of sexuality.
THIS is the same today where BIGOTS like Norman whom spout about the war as though there was not any BUM BOYS in it!
INTOLLERANCE is alive and well thanks to 90 year old NORMAN SCARTH probably saved by a BUM BOY that ended up commiting suicide when he should have been made a millionaire for his work and been granted FREEMAN of the country to fuck up the arse anyone he so chose.
PEOPLE with these sorts of views need stringing up by the BALLS in my opinion we are in 2015 for fuck sake but we are still supposed to tolerate such BIGOTRY. Alan Turing (1912-1954).

MAY 23 2015 [619650]visits.

MAY 22 2015 [619623]visits.

MAY 20 2015 [619580]visits.

MAY 18 2015 [619525]visits.

When you have a big festering problem IT NEEDS LANCING right from the very TOP

MAY 17 2015 [619511]visits.

You can clearly see within my email system because of problems before PATRICK CULLINANE was placed within my safe lists within regard to SPAM mail or abuse mail making him a priority but yet further down the line here we are again with his emails being BLOCKED to me.
This was what he got back as bounced to him because it was SPAM but yet he is in my safelist, would you believe your mail was being tampered with???
-----Original Message----- From: Mail Delivery System [] Sent: 16 May 2015 21:44
Subject: [SPAM] Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
The following message to was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 553-'5.3.0 Your message was rejected for possible spam/virus content.
Please ask your email provider to visit for resolution.'
NOW of course we being reasonable sane individuals know this goes on and so PATRICK sent this email to another address of my partner who received it no problem and in turn it was sent to me NO PROBLEM so why is CAMPAIGNER Patrick CULLINANE being prevented from communicating with me when my email package is my own, a name I purchased, a private email address and DOMAIN... let's write to NETWORK SOLUTIONS CEO for an answer?.
Dear Michael Benson FAO your Leadership David L. Brown, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer & President
Attached complaint
Our domain email address is being TAMPERED WITH not for the 1st time.
REPY:Dear Mike,
The individual you've mentioned above is set to be blocked until Tuesday due to sending too much spam to our mail server.
It's not specific to your email account, it's our mail servers in general that are preventing his traffic.
Sent from my iPhone

MAY 14 2015 [619450]visits.

MAY 10 2015 [619365]visits.

Check out the guest list & does it raise any questions

MAY 10 2015 [619352]visits.

HOW EXACTLY will GENTILES[christians] get any Justice with the new Justice minister Michael Gove being an open ZIONIST. His links and support of Israel very clear does this not further demonstrate how we are being sold down the river in a corrupt collusion of illusion that you are getting Justice?
THE OBVIOUS clear friendship with fellow jew and pedophile LORD JANNER[Rothschild] who remains unprosecuted for his crimes.
IS THIS now going to be the NEW FACE of BRITISH Justice for gentiles... I THINK NOT!!
In a letter sent today to GOVE I outline the above thoughts here.

MAY 9 2015 [619335]visits.

If someone has ‘wronged’ you, by their actions, you have a remedy, in Law. The Common Law is the Law-of-the-Land, and is the highest man-made Law under which the People of the Nation are bound.
Under the Common Law, everyone is individually responsible for their own actions. The ‘office’ they may hold, the ‘authority’ they may consider they have, and/or the uniform they may wear, does not protect them in any way, shape, form. Simply because they (like everyone else) are responsible for every action they take. This was set into tablets of stone following Word War II, at the Nuremberg Trials. German Officers claimed “I was only obeying orders”, yet they were still found guilty, and hung accordingly. This also forms a part of the Geneva Convention to which most Countries are signatories, especially the United Kingdom. Thus “I was only obeying orders” is not a defence.
The reasoning is simple: BEFORE taking any actions against anyone else, make sure that what you are doing is lawful and moral. If you suspect that the action you have been ordered to take is either unlawful or immoral, then you must refuse to obey. You can report the order, and your reasons for believing it to be unlawful and/or immoral to a higher authority. You can go as high as you like in the chain of authority, pointing out that anyone who conspires to support the unlawful/immoral order are making themselves accomplices, in Law. And that, as a consequence, they (themselves) will be held fully accountable, in Law.

MAY 8 2015 [619320]visits.
GAME SET & MATCH to the COMMON LAWs of ENGLAND the context of whistleblowing and that it is appropriate to interpret the provisions so far as one properly can do so to provide protection to the whistle blower, rather than deny it.
110. Going beyond the evidence to make a point of wider interest in this year of the 800th Anniversary of Magna Carta, (sealed in 1215 - well before the establishment of the Church of England in the time of Henry VIII), the very first clause of that instrument was that the English Church should be free. The value placed on freedom by the institution is obvious. That would, I think, include freedom of thought and conscience for individual incumbents, free from interference by parishioners or the Church's hierarchy. I take no account of that point in forming my judgment as the appellant took no point on it. But freedom has been a defining ethos: see, for example, section 9(6) of the 2009 Measure summarised in paragraph 9 above. There is, as Lewison LJ points out, another interesting point in Magna Carta for the purposes of this appeal, namely clause 18 of the 1215 version, which sought to confine disputes about the exercise of the right of patronage (then called "darrein presentment") to local court sessions. This demonstrates the length of the history attached to the right of patronage. Moreover, according to my researches, it touches on the point that, from as long ago as mediaeval times (through the influence of canon law), our land law recognised the right of patronage as a right of property, separate from that in the church building itself, and from that developed the valuable concept of incorporeal hereditaments, to which Lewison LJ refers in his judgment.
143: "The remedy of the patron is by action at common law. To try what? Of course to try, first, whether the patron had the right to present; and, secondly, if so, whether he has presented a fit person. The former is not questioned. Who is to decide the latter? The answer is easy—the Court of common law. Therefore, a plea founded upon unfitness must, in the first instance, shew an unfitness which the Court can recognise as a disqualification, and not mere inconclusive evidence of unfitness. If the plea sufficiently shews unfitness, then its truth is to be tried either by a jury, if the cause be a crime, or by the certificate of the metropolitan if it be insufficiency: for which purpose the Court of common law, according as the case may be, either summons a jury or sends a writ to the metropolitan, commanding him in the Queen's name to try the question, and to certify the result to the Court. And that inquiry must take place according to legal rules of evidence; for, even in cases within the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Courts, the Courts of common law restrain those Courts by prohibition when they require evidence inconsistent with the common law, as, for instance, two witnesses to a payment."

MAY 7 2015 [619310]visits.

Israel dominated UK polotics & lobbyists

MAY 7 2015 [619295]visits.

The controversial and secretive Court of Protection should be opened up to public scrutiny in the interests of justice, a major legal report said yesterday.
The court, which decides the affairs of people too ill or disabled to make their own decisions, needs safeguards against miscarriages of justice, it found.

MAY 6 2015 [619265]visits.

MAY 6 2015 [619260]visits.

MAY 6 2015 [619255]visits.

You are not dead, you are alive. PAY with promissory notes. A person is your birth certificate.. a corporation thats DEAD. FRAUD by joinder is whats happening. STOP it now!

MAY 5 2015 [619247]visits.

A judge due to rule on whether a cancer sufferer can be evicted from his home for falling behind on his mortgage will give his verdict via email after angry protesters mobbed the court. Judge Nigel Godsmark QC has told grandfather-of-two Tom Crawford, 64, that he will receive his judgement electronically over fears that giving it in court could start a riot. Mr Crawford has been battling the bailiffs over claims he still owes £43,000 in outstanding mortgage repayments since 2007.

MAY 5 2015 [619230]visits.

CATHERINE CHARLOTTE PELLING, THICKWITHENS FARM, RED LANE, HIGHER SUTTON, MACCLESFIELD, CHESHIRE, SK11 0NA receives a required property deeds charge NOTICE of £1 MILLION for her husband PHILIP MARK PELLING committing HIGH TREASON in the face of the statutory declaration contract that was served upon him.

MAY 4 2015 [619219]visits.

Taboo-felony sex rings are the stock in trade for grooming politicians that get the big PAC money for promotion straight to the top.
PERVERTED ARGUMENT: The laws of requiring professionals and clergy to report abuse to law authorities actually does more harm than good. Victims don’t want to be dragged through courts and publicly recount their traumas.
Exposure of this evil also gives us a window into the kind of people who seek political office and positions of authority in the modern world.
Just finished the first volume of British author Jeffrey Archer’s prison memoirs, which includes the revelations of a fellow inmate who — from the age of 13 — was pimped out to “JUDGES, schoolmasters, police officers, politicians and other upstanding citizens who are the backbone of our country”. Prisons in the Western world are filled with casualties like this, systematically abused by prominent people who then use their influence and networking to keep this all hidden.
GUESS what: The pedophiles and homosexuals who happen to be Jewish will receive little or no punishment and the worst they will suffer is public embarrassment, but gentiles will get the worst of it. WHAT are Gentiles I hear you say....? WELL they are you and me CHRISTIANS because it's the JEWISH who are controlling our establichment.. which explains why LORD JANNER is NOT being prosecuted! HE IS A JEW by the real name of ROTHSCHILD... do your own research if you don't believe me.

MAY 3 2015 [619194]visits.

MAY 2 2015 [619164]visits.
The Uk is fast becoming one of the most unsafe places to live in the world and most people are blissfully unaware of whats going on around them until of course the bubble will inevitably burst in a gigantic eruption that from where I'm sitting feels very very close.

MAY 2 2015 [619162]visits.
in another report in the Law Gazette

APRIL 30 2015 [619116]visits.
This will enlighten those that want to know the truth about the real process of LAW that is going on in the UK.. a LAW that's not recogniseable as our own... a LAW that's been introdruced by STEALTH.. in otherwords you ain't seen it coming.. but mark my words it's here.. The invasion of a foreign power has taken hold by JEWISH TALMUDIC LAW which is in turn cleansing the Christians out of their property, their cash & more worryingly their rights to justice are now virtually extinct! READ this alarming article demonstrating what has happened.
& see he's update of NO progress here

OF course do not forget myself and my disabled mother also in forced exile!
Hello Michael Clarke, the Law of the Land: = Magna Carta 1215 has been HIJACKED by a Foreign Power, which is High Treason!
Patrick Cullinane was ROBBED of his Home and Possessions' by 13 High Court 'Judges' without a Trial by my Peers.
Barnet Council ROBBED Patrick Cullinane of his Allotment Plot (Plot 29) of 22-years on a BLATANT pack of LIES - without a Trial by my Peers.
Patrick Cullinane was unlawfully JAILED by 'Judge' Gullick in Bradford for 4-months - without a Trial by my Peers.
A Trial by OUR Peers is guaranteed by Article 39 of Magna Carta 1215 the Law of the Land. - The Law of the Land has been HIJACKED by the JEWdiciary in the interest of the State of Israel: = High Treason.
Michael, YOU and your mother / family have also been victims of these TALMUDIC Commercial Kangaroo Courts. - Like Englishman, Norman Scarth, who fought for his country in the Second World War, as English People you have also been CLEANSED from your OWN country by the JEWDiciary in the UK.
They want the Clarkes' MONEY and Property in Blackpool. - In 1290 the JEWdiciary were KICKED out of England for the very same reasons. Michael, sing it from the ROOFTOPS my friend, as the JEWdiciary in the UK have done exactly to the English and Irish Peoples' in Britain and Ireland, as they have done to the Palistinian People in their HOMELAND:

APRIL 28 2015 [619069]visits.

Seven Judges named in this claim are accused of collusion and conspiracy to pervert the course of a real jury court justice that a common man requires under common law.
The 800 yr old anniversary of the MAGNA CARTA 1215 will be on this coming 15th June 2015 and this claim is to be followed up by a CLASS ACTION INDITEMENT involving many other people, naming alot more JUDGES whom believe they can get away with JEWDICIAL TYRANNY committing HIGH TREASON with no-one to answer to?
They will have to answer, to the people for which the MAGNA CARTA 1215 was written to protect.
If their JEWISH conspiracy thinks our nation is going to sleepwalk into a POLICE STATE of FREEMASONIC pedophile controlled government that has been subverted by stealth, hijacking our laws to the perverse Talmudic LAW denying christians their rights without a fight THINK AGAIN?
MAGNA CARTA 1215 was put in place to protect from such a TYRANNY.
Watch this space and more to be reported on over the coming weeks events that are to start this weekend.
Wesley Ahmed shared Wesley P P Hall's video.
. Before you think about contemplate voting... Please share and make sure that everyone on your facebook gets to see this.
If you live in the UK, you **NEED** to share this. Especially if you're a parent.
What's happening here is disturbing... And it has been hidden for years...
Thankfully, there's many people actively campaigning for change and we're piecing all of the information together...
The current political system has been orchestrated to facilitate banksters and corporate greed who bribe politicians that engage in ‪#‎RitualisticChildAbuse‬ and ‪#‎murder‬.
For many years now, the UK has allowed politicians to abuse, decapitate and murder vulnerable children.
Banksters & corporate spys setup traps and film the torture, abuse & murder.
Politicians then create and manipulate the laws to aid the banksters & corporates and their agendas.
Jimmy Saville was NOT as isolated case. Neither was Cyril Smith. There is a wide paedophile network operating in parliament and the monarchy here in the UK.
This has been exposed by Tom Watson, Jim Hood, Simon Danczuk and John Hemming... 4 MP's who have themselves detailed numerous disturbing cases...
Tom Watson asks David Cameron in PM's questions if the government will investigate a powerful paedophile network linked to number 10 -
Jim Hood names Leon Brittan in Parliament as paedophile -
Simon Danczuk describes pressure on him & others not to expose paedophiles in parliament -
John Hemming questioning why Nick Clegg blocked a bill which would have made it much easier for victims to challenge a failure to prosecute -
‪#‎SocialServices‬ are taking away over 1000 children a month for ‪#‎ForcedAdoption‬.
The staff are unaware where these children are going or why there's such a high demand. We need whistle blowers in this organisation who are willing to expose the target driven monetary system that's been created with children taken away from their parents. Granted, Social Services do have a part to play in society when there's a real danger... But mothers are losing their children for some seriously illogical reasons... Which are then subjected to abuse...
Please watch ‪#‎Traffic‬ -
Follow Kellie Cottam and her campaign Forced Adoption Exposed
Sabine K McNeil is a German MEP who's exposed what's happening here at European Parliament...
She's detailed inhumane satanic rituals that are happening NOW in Hampstead. Two children have been filmed detailing acts of abuse that they've been subjected to by their own father and a powerful paedophile ring involving local professionals in the area. These children can be seen speaking about their ordeal...
Follow Sabine on Twitter:
And visit her website:
And also follow Belinda McKenzie who's worked on many of these cases.
Follow the campaigns from Bill Maloney and join the group PIENMASH FILMS BY BILL MALONEY AND INCORPORATING HOLLIE GREIG FILMS who works tirelessly to help victims come forward and expose these evil entities.
The western media are HIDING THIS FROM YOU.
Nick Clegg protects paedophiles... as does David Cameron. Please research Camerons involvement in the Carlton TV deal that bought The Cook Reports footage of politicians abusing children so it could be suppressed and not televised.
Many people within the main political parties are engaging in these sick incidents which seems to have one common denominator...
Many of these are Freemasons!!!!!
There's a ‪#‎freemason‬ lodge in nearly every town & city in the country. Members tend to be in positions of power. The people controlling society.
Lower degrees aren't aware of what's happening in the higher degrees and see the 'brotherhood' as a means to progress economically as it's 'good for business'... They're naive...
Here is a video that everyone should watch...
Once a Mason reaches ‪#‎RoyalArch‬ degree, he is to conceal all crimes of brother Masons, including murder and treason.
Royal Arch Masons swear:
“I will aid and assist a companion Royal Arch Mason, when engaged in any difficulty, and espouse his cause, so far as to extricate him from the same, if in my power, whether he be right or wrong…. A companion Royal Arch Mason’s secrets, given me in charge as such, and I knowing him to be such, shall remain as secure and inviolable, in my breast as in his own, murder and treason not excepted.”
The ‪#‎BlueLodge‬ degrees read:
“Whenever you see any of our signs made by a brother Mason, and especially the grand hailing sign of distress, you must always be sure to obey them, even at the risk of your life. If you’re on a jury, and the defendant is a Mason, and makes the grand hailing sign, you must obey it; you must disagree with your brother jurors, if necessary, but you must be sure not to bring the Mason guilty, for that would bring disgrace upon our order. It may be perjury, to be sure, to do this, but then you’re fulfilling your obligation, and you know if you live up to your obligations you’ll be free from sin.”
VOTING for the three main parties that engage in this activity is WRONG!!!!! It's EVIL and you should either SPOIL YOUR VOTE or VOTE FOR AN INDEPENDENT - Someone who's going to represent THE PEOPLE instead of banks, corporates and the political parties engaging in abuse and murder.
‪#‎WakeUp‬ and do EVERYTHING you can to expose these sick twisted people who are controlling OUR society.
We don't have to live like this!!!!!
These people have money for war, misery and evil acts...
They take pride in watching the nation starve...
‪#‎Homeless‬ and mentally ill...
Targeting their support services with their inhumane austerity measures... And welfare reform...
Hundreds of thousands dependant on ‪#‎FoodBanks‬...
Depressed, anxious and starving from ‪#‎BenefitSanctions‬...
Leaving these people to commit suicide to aid their agenda for population control... frown emoticon
Or in prison for legal ‪#‎slavery‬... frown emoticon Criminalised for being homeless...
Stripping our public services and privatising them... frown emoticon
Whilst we're the 5th richest country in the world... unsure emoticon ?!?
They send our poor to fight for a false sense of patriotism and then leave them to suffer without support... On the streets... 1 in every 9 homeless are ex-military...
And to 'top it off'... They're abusing the nations children... sexually, emotionally and even killing them... Decapitating their bodies...
Alisa & Gabriel - We trust you - You WILL change history
The UK Revolution is inevitable.
If you care about the children... PLEASE SHARE
Because if you don't... It will continue to happen frown emoticon
Expect Us

APRIL 26 2015 [619030]visits.
& oh my GOD follow up video interview here
******** here
My name is Tony Farrell, I am a former Principal Intelligence Analyst within the police service and this website will provide an opportunity for viewers to download utterly damning information exposing what must be one of the most monstrous cover ups in the history of the British Judicial system. The case material freely on offer here concerns corruption and racketeering within the media and the entertainment industry extending into circles of the judiciary and the police service.
Beneficiaries of this decade of racketeering include the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Virgin Media. Scottish TV and large international law firm such as Bindmans with its associated linkages to Terrorism and the Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking and the police media relationship. This case contains an extraordinary illustrative example of prolonged gang-stalking and a reign of domestic terror at its most blatant. Some of the down-loadable material has clear relevance to the London Bombings of 7th July 2005 and the assassination of Jean Charles De Menezes two weeks later.
This material will shock, scare and infuriate, but it will also enlighten and encourage. This is a truly outrageous case. It involves MS SEVEN, MS CHARLES SEVEN – a Rosa Parks of our generation. The available material tells of her battle against some of the giants of the entertainment industry and against high profile individuals, corporations and controlling systems. It is a case that will strike at the treasonous corruption within our midst.

APRIL 26 2015 [619020]visits.

7 minutes in you can hear the 1st step is to control a nations money!!

APRIL 25 2015 [618977]visits.
Magna Carta 1215 & The Bill of Rights guarantees, We the People, the following: Trial by Jury, Habeas Corpus, Presumption of Innocence, The Right to Silence, No Taxation Without Representation, No Cruel or Unusual Punishment: = All these principals, and others, are at the core of our Constitution and integral to our liberty. - Why, oh why is there nobody appointed to investigate the usurpation of our Common Law Rights, which is High Treason? -
The following is the incontrovertible evidence that the ZIONIST MAFIA have HIJACKED, Magna Carta 1215, the Constitutional Law of the Land: + Constitutions and Governments’ in the UK, USA, Australia and Ireland by controlling 96% of the World’s MEDIA and infiltrating OUR Governments, JEWdiciary and Police, which are ALL working in support of the interests of the State of Israel now: -
Video - Channel 4 UK - Broadcast November 16, 2009 Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel Lobby
Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.
Political commentator Peter Oborne investigates how accountable, transparent and open to scrutiny the lobby is, particularly in regard to its funding and financial support of MPs.
Oborne examines how the lobby operates from within parliament and the tactics it employs behind the scenes when engaging with print and broadcast media.…/33719/inside_britains_israel_lobby/
This Zionist MAFIA Gangster, Alan Shatter, fooled the Irish People and has done irreversible HARM to Ireland: -
The Misplaced Minister: Ireland and Israel’s Alan Shatter By wmw_admin on March 9, 2013 Camillus – Occidental Observe March 2, 2013 For the past two years Ireland’s immigration policy has been in the hands of Alan Shatter, a Jew and an outspoken partisan of Israel. Alan Shatter, born and bred in Dublin of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, has made it Irish policy to increase Third World immigration to the Emerald Isle. As Minister of Justice, Equality, and Defence, Shatter is exerting his considerable clout to skew the Republic’s Middle East policy, formerly supportive of the Palestinians and critical of Israel, toward Zionist aims. (This Zionist PAEDOPHILE allowed babies to be ABUSED & RAPED in Ireland)
How did this Zionist Gangster, Alan Shatter, get to be the Justice Minister in Ireland? - Yes, they go for ALL the KEY positions!
Alan Shatter has got rid of the Irish People from Ireland and filled it with FOREIGNERS! -
John Paterson‎Patrick Cullinane
United States Government is run by the Jews - The Federal Reserve System and World Bank are owned by the Jews The Media is Jewish Hollywood is Jewish The Catholic Church is “owned” and run by the Jews The National Council of Churches is owned and run by the Communist Jews Freemasonry is Jewish Communism is Jewish The Illuminati is owned, run and dominated by the Jews The Mafia is Jewish (NOT Italian) The Pornography Industry is Jewish Black Slavery was started and controlled by the Jews The U.S. Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is controlled by the Jews The NAACP was started by and is controlled still by the Jews The Pentagon is controlled by the Jews... Jews Behind Illegal Immigration The Legal and Legislative Profession is controlled by the Jews...and the list goes on and on and on .....Rothschild calls Canadian Prime Minister a “slave” to Israel. Israeli Operatives in the U.S.Schwarzenegger is a Rothschild puppet. Jewish Rothschilds own the Queen,the Vatican, the Mafia, and most of the land in the world Death Penalty for any non-Jew who steals from a Jew Jews ADMIT that Jews Control Hollywood.....and on and on and on and on.........Get it... here
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero
here at

APRIL 23 2015 [618895]visits.

APRIL 22 2015 [618882]visits.

APRIL 22 2015 [618880]visits.

But this pillar of the community, and apparently admirable man, "LORD JANNER" is also alleged to be a paedophile, and stands accused of 22 sexual offences, said to have taken place from 1969 to 1998, involving nine children and young adults. These range from indecent assault to buggery. So says the Crown Prosecution Service, which regrets it can’t bring a case against 86-year-old Janner as he is suffering from dementia. This hasn’t prevented him from attending the House of Lords hundreds of times since the diagnosis was first made in 2009, his most recent attendance being little more than a year ago. Nor has he been deterred from claiming more than £100,000 in parliamentary expenses and allowances during this period.
Read more:

APRIL 22 2015 [618870]visits.

APRIL 21 2015 [618850]visits.
This email places Judge Jackson squarely on one side of the fence for if you are in doubt about the man his wikipiedia description conflicts with his own quotes directly showing only one thing.. CONFLICT.
Mr Justice Peter Jackson Court of Protection "Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised" End
A lot of help he is issuing here?
Or is the real Peter Jackson more better described in WIKIPIEDIA as..
The person who is a "master tactician (link)[who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not,"
I think we have now got the picture.

APRIL 21 2015 [618845]visits.

APRIL 20 2015 [618823]visits.

HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES is the one who is at the centre of our plight. WHILST he enjoys the trappings of his ill gotten gains facilitated by the COURT of protection of JEWdicial corruption fiercly and corruptly guarding their racketeering scams that are obviously prospering at the expense of what will be many more innocent victims he will plunder their estates. Hugh Adrian Scott Jones continues to enjoy his wealth living comfortably with his wife Susan Patricia Jones, sons Henry & David at Booths Hall, Booths Hall Rd, Manchester M28 1LB.
The sinister side to this man lies within this website and his failing to answer the questions within the commercial lien ... a statement of truth notarised. that led to a judicial conspiracy to pervert and prevent justice by the unlawful jailing of the carer of his client my mother whom had capacity throughout.
Whilst we fled into exile penniless HUGH JONES although we believe forced out of PANNONES LLP continues to practice under the name of HUGH JONES Solicitors escaping his crimes as of yet.
Click on the link at the start to see this article about his rise in fortunes off the backs of the vulnerable without any accountability printed yesterday in the MANCHESTER EVENING NEWS.
Make no mistake about the following because this is the reality.. Truthful comments about the real HUGH JONES were placed in the comments section of this article and were removed immediately,, you do not not need look too far as to the reason for this because 96% of the worlds media is owned by the JEWS and taking into account who owns the crown and that all BAR members are agents of the crown including JEWdicial then the words protection become very clear. ALL of course backed by a FREEMASON police state of foot soldiers to carry out the dirty work that the pedophile government will do zero about for fear of BLACKMAIL reprisals. END result.. A TYRANNY inflicting terrorism on UK elderly & vulnerable where satanic rituals are routinely carried out on the theft of children. STOP looking the other way you have been invaded by a foreign power using STEALTH to shield its action removing UK christians rights to JUSTICE under common law and your ultimate right to property that is routinely being stolen & whilst your busy with that children are being raped sodomised and murdered by the ones you vote for.

APRIL 18 2015 [618783]visits.
By John Hardon
Jewish banishment and The “City” of London
Anyone thinking very logically and simply would simply ask one question: Why have Jews (zionists) been banished from so many different countries and cultures over the centuries? By Peoples who have never had the opportunity to conspire against them because of vast distances between the countries who have banished them, yet all of these people have, at different times throughout history, felt it necessary to do just that for no reason?
All of these cultures have just some racial hatred of Jews? There’s no logic in it. The only common denominator which permeates throughout these banishments is that of money and usury.
Henk Ruyssenaars’ article on July 10th 2006 drew attention to the book “Descent into Slavery” by Des Griffin in which the real meaning of the term “City of London” is explained. The following is an excerpt from that article.
“To the majority of people the words “Crown” and “City” in reference to London refer to the queen or the capital of England.” This is not the truth. The “City” is in fact a privately owned Corporation – or Sovereign State – occupying an irregular rectangle of 677 acres and located right in the heart of the 610 square mile ‘Greater London’ area. The population of ‘The City’ is listed at just over four thousand, whereas the population of ‘Greater London’ (32 boroughs) is approximately seven and a half million.
“The Crown” is a committee of twelve to fourteen men who rule the independent sovereign state known as London or ‘The City.’ ‘The City’ is not part of England. It is not subject to the Sovereign. It is not under the rule of the British parliament. Like the Vatican in Rome, it is a separate, Independent state.
“The City”, which is often called “the wealthiest square mile on earth,” is ruled over by a Lord Mayor. Here are grouped together Britain’s great financial and commercial institutions: Wealthy banks, dominated by the privately-owned (Rothschild controlled) Bank of England, Lloyd’s of London, the London Stock Exchange, and the offices of most of the leading international trading concerns. Here, also, is located Fleet Street, the heart and core of the newspaper and publishing worlds.

APRIL 17 2015 [618746]visits.
Great News... Ex Pilot Len Lawrence telephoned me this morning to convey the news that the FRAUD office have been ordered to take statements from those affected by the Court of Protection and its ongoing racketeering of fraud.

APRIL 17 2015 [618732]visits.
I have sent you a friend request and I have also attached a draft copy of the LIEN that shortly will be served upon you at MANCHESTER court.
As you are aware I believe you have now been appointed to head up the collusion and conspiracy to deny me real common law justice.
You must take note that what is about to take place is a serious affect upon your ability to act in commerce by the LIEN becoming attached to you as a DEED of debt that WE are going to pursue.
MANCHESTER HIGH COURTS are corrupt and I hope that you are not party to it but I won't hold my breath.
I suggest you digest the content to make your own mind up seeing as you now hold the keys to my progression in GAINING justice. Original Lien & the Lien addendum/attachment here

APRIL 16 2015 [618718]visits.

APRIL 16 2015 [618716]visits.

APRIL 14 2015 [618643]visits.
A period now of 10 days has been given to 5 Judges to review their collusion and conspiracy to deny representation and due process of common law in a common law jurisdiction. Upon the 19th April 2015 expiring without any change of heart then a process will start of an addendum to Commercial Lien. The Commercial Lien here will have added to it the 5 Judges names of SHARP FOSKITT PELLING SWIFT & HOVINGTON, these being those directly involved in the collusion of conspiracy to deny due process of common law to a court de jure with representation. The process will start next with a sworn affidavit that will hold bullet points of common law claims that they will be required to answer on rebuttal point by point. The failure to answer point by point in a rebuttal of my claim will then be classed under common law as the TRUTH the whole truth and nothing but the truth and thus will attach itself and those 5 Judges to the current Commercial Lien currently valued at £9 million. Another short period of Notice of Default will be issued and failing their final oppertunity each Judge without rebuttal will incorporate a financial penalty added to the debt by £1 million taking the overall debt to £14 million that, will be jointly and severally liable by all 56 named parties with dates of birth. This document having been pre informed by relevant authority is and will be apostilled to an EU Hague convention document standard and then I intend to proceed on EU levels to enforce it. - NOTICE sent

APRIL 11 2015 [618601]visits.

APRIL 8 2015 [618542]visits.

APRIL 7 2015 [618515]visits.

APRIL 7 2015 [618505]visits.
I received a Council Tax Bill a couple of weeks ago.
I decided to respond & send it back to them.
Here's what I wrote:
Dear Members of the CRIMINAL FRATERNITY,
The enclosed paperwork is being returned to you because, although it implies ‘MY Council Tax Bill’, it is actually YOUR Council Tax Bill. Simple reason: I have never CONTRACTED ANY OBLIGATION - TO YOU - to pay it.
The Bill of Rights 1688/89 says that I’m not obliged to FORFEIT ANYTHING until I have committed some criminal act, and been found guilty of that act. Since I have not committed such an act, I have NO OBLIGATION TO FORFEIT ANYTHING – including your monetary demands.
In previous letters I have already written, many times, that – if you wish to pay for ‘local services’ - you should be DEMANDING that the Government ‘does its proper job’ and (instead of BORROWING from Banks, at massive ‘Interest’) to make the necessary money itself. Which it is perfectly capable of doing, as American President Abraham Lincoln did in the mid-1800s, and Chancellor Lloyd George did, in the United Kingdom, in 1914.
And you should be doing that instead of CRIMINALLY demanding ‘money-with-menaces’ from the population of this (or any other) Borough. In plain words, instead of CRIMINALLY engaging in ‘State-sponsored’ EXTORTION.
Let’s get something perfectly clear. So that there’s absolutely ZERO misunderstanding. ‘Banks’ make ‘money’ out of thin air. The Bank of England have admitted this fact. The Federal Reserve (in America) have admitted this fact. Fucking Google it! If ‘Banks’ can make it ‘out of thin air’, then ‘Governments ‘ can make it ‘out of thin air’! Can’t they? Why not? Who is in charge – the ‘Banks’ or the ‘Governments’?????
Now, I’ll tell you a true story. (It’s a story about me, the Writer of this letter).
Once upon a time …
… there was a thing called the Poll Tax.
I refused to pay it, and spent a month in jail (Highdown, Sutton) for that refusal. At the time, I felt that it was ‘wrong’, but I did not then know anything about the Bill of Rights 1688/89 (which, of course, explains exactly WHY it was wrong).
So, on the basis of that:
I’ve been to prison for refusing to pay the forerunner of YOUR Council Tax, and therefore I’m NOT AFRAID TO DO THAT AGAIN. (Been there, done it … bought the T-shirt!)
At the time (early 1990s) the amount I refused to pay was £525. KEEP THAT AMOUNT IN MIND.
At the time, the cost of keeping someone inside prison, PER PERSON/PER WEEK was £2,500 (at 1990s prices).
The five weeks I spent ‘at her Majesty’s pleasure’ cost 5 x £2,500 = £12,500 (at 1990s prices) … which had to be picked up by ‘the Taxpayer’ … which includes you, the Reader of this letter, and all your colleagues, friends, relatives, etc. etc.
That amount does not include Court costs, nor does it include Police time to chase/arrest me, etc. I think that another £10,000 (at 1990s prices) would be a reasonable estimate for that.
So, the total of this story, which had to be funded by ‘the Taxpayer’, would have been something like £22,500 (at 1990s prices). Reminder: £22,500 EXPENDED IN AN EFFORT TO RECOVER A POLL TAX BILL of £525.
A Poll Tax Bill of £525 which has never been paid. Because, allow me to remind you, you can send me to prison as many times as you like … BUT I’LL BE FUCKED IF I PAY YOU A RED CENT.
When I came out of prison, in 1993, I wrote to the Council asking them how they thought they would get paid their £525. It’s now 2015, and I’m still awaiting a reply from them.
That was £22,500 at 1990s prices. Fuck knows what it would cost today … probably something like £30,000, all told. And you are demanding £45.90! Maybe your INSANE ‘ECONOMICS’ can contend with that?
(And that, btw, was for 5 weeks in jail. Your local Maggot’s Circus can jail someone for up to 9 months. So 39 weeks at - say - £3,500 PER PERSON/PER WEEK = £136,500 … according to my calculator. Are you up for WASTING that amount of your precious ‘money’? For £45.90 that you won’t get? Better reign in your Puppets, if not! I’ll leave you to work out how to do that. After all, you rent the Maggots and their Circus for the day, don’t you?)
I will be publishing this letter as far and wide as I can, in order to encourage others to take a stand against your (and other Council’s) CRIMINALITY. It will go out on an e-mail list that has more than 100 recipients. And it will be spread from there.
You will – of course - do what you will do. No doubt clutch your pox-ridden ‘UNLAWFUL bag of Legals’, in the form of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, for all its worth. But it’s NOT ‘Law’ … it’s just a ‘Legal’, and you are not going to get paid, because I have the LAW - in the form of the Bill of Rights 1688/89 - on my side. All you will ever achieve is a MASSIVE WASTE OF RESOURCES. I’m 71 years old this year, and I no longer give a fuck – except when it comes to bowing down & kow-towing to CRIMINALS … by giving in … to YOUR ‘State-sponsored EXTORTION’.
Listen: ‘Extortion’ is ‘extortion’ … from whatever source it comes. Do yourself a favour. Quit your job. Get yourself one that does not involve EXTORTION. A job that is fully-compatible with the Common Law, and doesn’t trample rough-shod on people’s INHERENT RIGHTS IN LAW & UNDER THE COMMON LAW.
You will do what you will do. Of course.
But whatever you do – in pursuance of your ‘UNLAWFUL bag of Legals’ - you’re fucked.
Along with ‘the Taxpayers’.
Thus the only real question you need to resolve is: “Just how fucked do you wish ‘the Taxpayers’ to be?”
Peaceful Inhabitant
Without any admission of any liability for anything whatsoever and with all Natural, Indefeasible, Common Law Rights reserved.

APRIL 7 2015 [618501]visits.
13 High Court Zionist 'Judges' in England paid no price for CONSPIRING and ROBBING me of my Home and Possessions without Due Process, which is High Treason: - This man was right all along.
The Talmudic JEWdiciary have HIJACKED the Constitutional Common Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215 and are ROBBING and Genocideing us Christians with IMPUNITY.
Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK's COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.
In a telephone conversation yesterday with this man for an hour and a half Patrick explained what had happened and where there was never any justice given or any compensation. He has been fighting the JEWdiciary all this time and states he is not going to stop un Justice finally arrives. In his quest he has uncovered startling information which backs his belief that Jewish Talmudic Law has infiltrated the very heart of government organisations and Justice systems in order to commit genocide on good christians deprivng them of ANY PROPERTY and more serious ANY RIGHTS to JUSTICE.
This being said and all his experience falls directly inline with what is happening to me and many many others with whom we are communicating.
SO THEIR IS NO RULE OF LAW IN THE UK and where there is no remedy there can only be alternatives & commercial liens are the potent weapon.
One judge said to me well you could do this and do that, but the reason for this is that the courts are a business.. a corporation.. a cash generating machine thats WHY they want you to make applications and pay fees.
My mother and I are poor she on a pension and me carer, where we were supposedly protected under their own rules... rules laid out by them.. my mother under parens patrea as a patient of the court of protection was covered.. she should not have to do anything.. they were supposed to protect..once a crime had been reported it was their failed duty of care that was and is unaccountable so THEY BELIEVE! I as carer was protected under the Mental Capacity Act section 5.. supposedly, but no, their own rules went into the bin. They don't, as one so elequently put it PLAY BY THE RULEs no definately not.. not interested. Their only interest is cash and property.. they infact are committing genocide against christians. IT is a crime of INTERNATIONAL proportions one which they have sought so desperately to hide.. hence they dish out prison sentences from kangaroo courts without any consent, JUDGING BIASLY in their own cause to benefit themselves. IT IS however you look at it, CRIMINAL RACKETEERING for private corporate GAIN.
If you want proof of corporate courts then here it is..DUN & BRADSTREET

APRIL 6 2015 [618489]visits.
Attached NOTICE of 10 pages referring to TYRANNICAL VOID ORDERs OF case 2MA90015

This notice will be served by recorded delivery to the COURT
10 days after the delivery date acknowledged by the signatory of the court to be published on the following action will take place;
IF the court fails to acknowledge the obvious JEW-DICIAL failings by accepting VOID ORDER & removing IT TAKE NOTICE that it is my intention to ADD all 5 JUDGES to the commercial LIEN by £1 MILLION POUNDS EACH
Taking the overall joint and severally liable DEBT of the commercial LIEN to £14 million pounds

APRIL 6 2015 [618484]visits.
By Patrick Cullinane
this demonstrates how the CRIMINAL JEWS have infiltrated all aspects of our courts JEWdiciary and governmental departments to enslave christians and deprive them of property & NO RIGHTS to any justice. This is the shocking truth. You may not want to believe it, but read it yourself, see it for yourself and then convince us otherwise.
Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads: “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”
{Article 39} reads: “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”
{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”
{Article 45} reads: “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.

APRIL 5 2015 [618463]visits.
SUMMED up in 2 minutes

APRIL 3 2015 [618422]visits.

The JEWdicial corruption of infiltration & hijacking of constitutional common laws of our land ie MAGNA CARTA 1215 in favour of TALMUDIC jewish law has been going on some time now with little attention to facilitate the COURT FRAUD of PROPERTY and RIGHTS to JUSTICE for UK Christians as is written within this jewish law where we are mere animals treated like cattle nothing but barbaric.... where only Israelites are real men! Contained within this news letter is of course our grand juries and the forming of such to rid our country of such TREASONOUS CRIMINALS.

APRIL 2 2015 [618373]visits.

APRIL 1 2015 [618359]visits.
By a PIRATE system that is as always only protecting itself as it is unaccountable, that is leading to a revolution, we fear we have no option but to go live somewhere else in the world that will protect us, we require to have section 1 of JACKSONS order struck out as VOID.
REPLY: The Judge and I are now away from the RCJ for the Easter vacation returning on Tuesday 14th April. Emails will not be checked during this period.
Considering this is a quote from the very same Judge... Mr. Justice Peter Jackson, Court of Protection Judge
"[The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised" NOW having made such a statement one might ask the question WHY did he make the law virtually unobtainable for me and mum after sanctioning a LIVING WILL to be made making me living will executor should the likes of him STOP her from carrying out her wishes "UNDER THE LAW". Does it not seem rather contradictory!

APRIL 1 2015 [618352]visits.
Will continue to deny Christians the rights to property & JUSTICE via any means they can to purpetuate their own greed for fees from theft generating fraudulent courts of now known TALMUD zionist laws that have infiltrated and hijacked our countries common law protection.

APRIL 1 2015 [618330]visits.

MARCH 30 2015 [618290]visits.
Common Law has been replaced with Talmudic Law
Patrick Cullinane

Patrick: We have got to win this WAR or the Jews will destroy the WORLD with their GREED. Mike: In trying to understand how this jigsaw fixes together where the lack of any JUSTICE seems to flow now with impunity I was looking into the relationship between the VATICAN & ISRAEL because on the one hand you have the link between SOLICITOR - JUDGES = THE BAR & their 1st duty is to the court ie CROWN where THE BAR is privately owned and operated by the CROWN which like the BAR is a CORPORATION which is domiciled within the walled city of LONDON which is VATICAN owned but yet here we have the claim of TALMUDIC law having hijacked our great country's common law of the MAGNA CARTA 1215. Which ever way you look there is one thing for certain, The MAGNA CARTA 1215 has been hijacked by legalese pirates effectively carrying out CRIMINAL acts without anyone to persue them. ARTICLE 61 of the MAGNA CARTA covers for this very act of TREASON, that being LAWFUL REBELLION. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Patrick is right... these pirates have infiltrated all walks of our government and Justice departments in order to get to the level they have and personally I cannot now see how a LAWFUL rebellion will work... not least of all because we have no LAW.... REBELLION yes... BUT probably now going to be in the form of revolution. If on paper in 2003 you can clearly see in Patricks GUARDIAN article he was right and 13 Judges were wrong WHY are they still in place as JUDGES & WHY more importantly has Patrick still not got his rightful justice?
More Talmud info here

Camerans Jewish connection

MARCH 30 2015 [618272]visits.
Dear Patrick Ward
30.03.2015 1200hrs
Because I am being persecuted and victimised by the judiciary and court staff I have little or no faith in this system and so I ask can you please copy me in to the contact you are making with Manchester so I have a copy with date and time and of whom you are liaising with.
THERE is a case here growing of COURT FRAUD involving NAOMI PEARSON and I would not like for you to become involved in it Patrick as I am thinking that you could be one of the good guys!
Your cooperation would be appreciated.
mike clarke

From: Ward, Patrick [] Sent: 30 March 2015 13:24
To: 'Mike Clarke'
Cc: Armstrong, Lesley
Mr Clarke
I had already contacted Manchester staff regarding this matter prior to your last email.
I attached the last email correspondence with yourself and Ms Pearson. Before this matter may progress we require the fee as Ms Pearson has stated..
Please forward the application and fee and I will ensure the Team Leader will expedite this matter.

Dear Patrick
You are perhaps getting confused.
The matters regarding fees have been dealt with there is no fee required to STRIKE OUT VOID ORDERS.
The matter currently now to hand is in the emails sent to you.
ALL you need to do is read them.
I require the case transferring to LIVERPOOL HIGH COURT in its entirety.
This requirement was made by letter on the 22.03.2015 that was recorded as delivered to the court on the 24.03.2015
ALL I now require is confirmation that the case HAS in fact been transferred.
ALL you are doing with your last email is confusing matters that could be construed as deliberate delaying tactics to avoid progression of my required transfer.
NOW is it possible that you have understood the paperwork and is it possible to get a straight answer from the COURT?

mike clarke

Mr Clarke
Having perused the file.
I am unable to arrange for a transfer it without a Judges order stating such.
The only was I can arrange for this to be done is with an application from yourself and a requisite fee.
This is the case with every Civil and Family file. Staff cannot transfer a file without a Judges order stating that we can do so.

MARCH 30 2015 [618266]visits.
In a brief phone call this morning that ex flying vet from South Wales Maurice Kirk made to me he outlined that he has finally accepted the extreme fraud & corruption littered within the system from MPs right down to crooked court staff is beyond belief. He stated that after the long period in prison that he has had to endure where he believed that there must be some light at the end of the tunnel where justice may prevail he has come to ACCEPT that there is none. You are facing CRIMINALS that are now running the system and if you have THAT in mind when dealing with them then you might be able to understand what is happening without doubting it. HOW SAD IS THIS.

MARCH 28 2015 [618248]visits.

Andy Scarborough wrote lovely woman ...always was nice to me ....see if she remembers this ...its easy to smile when everythings fine and life rolls along like a song...but a mans worth while if he can smile when everythings gone fuckin wrong ....

MARCH 26 2015 [618210]visits.

MARCH 22 2015 [618126]visits.

MARCH 22 2015 [618125]visits.

from NAOMI PEARSON on the 30.03.2015
I currently off on maternity leave.
My emails will not be accessed.
If your query is urgent please contact Patrick Ward on 0161 240 5357
NEW EMAIL sent to PATRICK WARD 30.03.2015
I have received an email from NAOMI PEARSON that she is on maternity leave
If urgent she states to contact you
Below is the relevant URGENCY

I currently off on maternity leave.
My emails will not be accessed.
If your query is urgent please contact Patrick Ward on 0161 240 5357
Thank you

From: Mike Clarke [] Sent: 30 March 2015 11:53 To: PATRICK WARD
Cc: ''

DELIVERY MANAGER MANCHESTER HIGH COURT CASE 2MA90015 30.03.2015 I can confirm by the receipt below from the ROYAL MAIL TRACKING OFFICE That the attached file or linked below was delivered to you or the court on the 24.03.2015
ARE YOU THE SAME PATRICK WARD THAT NAOMI PEARSON IS referring to whom is on telephone number 0161 240 5357
Yes I am however I am not in post at Manchester yet but I will forward on this request and let you know the response asap.

Dear Patrick
30.03.2015 1200hrs
Because I am being persecuted and victimised by the judiciary and court staff I have little or no faith in this system and so I ask can you please copy me in to the contact you are making with Manchester so I have a copy with date and time and of whom you are liaising with.
THERE is a case here growing of COURT FRAUD involving NAOMI PEARSON and I would not like for you to become involved in it Patrick as I am thinking that you could be one of the good guys!
Your cooperation would be appreciated.
mike clarke

MARCH 20 2015 [618080]visits.

ain’t that the truth
“There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”
"The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities."
“When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion- When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing- when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favours- when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you- when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice- you may know that your society is doomed”.
"We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force."
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see."
"The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me." -- Ayn Rand
“Never forget an act is just words on paper. It’s people who do things to people even if they hide behind the words on paper…” Bill.
"A human being is a part of a whole, called by us _universe_, a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest... a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty." Einstein
"A man is no less a slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of years." [Lysander Spooner]

MARCH 20 2015 [618077]visits.

MARCH 20 2015 [618070]visits.

For making any application in this regard without 1st being granted permission by Judge HOVINGTON!
Only just received due to a change of address and a new re install of internet.

MARCH 13 2015 [617850]visits.
mike clarke v CROWN agents
New application sent to the court this morning stating that the BIAS in all orders in 2MA90015 stems from the CROWN and thus a JUDGE is unfit for purpose to judge in this matter without a court de jure/JURY. If i said I want my partner to Judge would that be BIAS of course it would so how can the BAR JUDGE THE BAR?? The commercial LIEN which they want removal is of course against agents of the CROWN. THE BAR is privately owned and operated by THE CROWN so if your claiming against the CROWN/BAR agents there can be only one JUDGEMENT made and that must come from a JURY. BIAS in court is strictly unlawful.

MARCH 11 2015 [617922]visits.
The pieces of this jigsaw are coming together, into focus.
We have wondered and wondered some more, why can we not get representation and why do the judiciary think they are above the law.
When you start to realise all is not how it seems, then you can see why the statute court process exudes its BIAS with impunity.
It basically is corrupt to the core.
All the keywords upon the background to this site do most definately apply with a few more I have missed soon to be added.
When you start to expose them for who and what they are, they come after you to file you into one of their prisons or nuthouses to silence you or force you to comply.
They are running a criminal racket, engineered to fill their pockets all in the name of protection.
They do not care a damn about the elderly, children or the vulnerable, JUST MONEY!
And anyone who dare to stand their way... whoe betide them.
If as ours, your case affects their system indirectly or direct you are up against the CROWN itself and that's why no one wants to touch it. They will NOT go against the crown as it breaches their 1st duty to it?
SO there you go... they have hijacked the only protection one might have in this instance... A COURT DE JURE! Jury court of 12 peers designed to protect against such tyranny that they say only THEY can decide upon???? TYRANNY
You only have to look at the judgements these priests of baal make.. they will not answer the relevant points of law put before them in a point by point rebuttal of your claim with an explanation of why they come to a conclusion of your case has no merit!! When clearly it is full of MERIT and they know damn well it is.
This is why there is no point by point rebuttal because they can't. SIMPLE.COM
They are as bad as the CRIMINALS who purpetrated the crimes against my mother and me now.
The court speak of HONOUR & DISHONOUR is only legalese jargon they use to excel their own perpetual greed because the only word I have seen in the entire system is DISHONOUR... leading to DISHONESTY.. just theives working daily to steal rob theive from the common man.
THEY will not get away with it in the longer term as the masses wake to what is gradually being exposed to them and revenge will be sweet.
They can wear a wig and profess HONOUOR but we are all the same in our vest and underpants. The HONOUR is only found in fighting the theiving corrupt bastards they are!

MARCH 10 2015 [617920]visits.
From: Mike Clarke []
Sent: 06 March 2015 20:58
To: 'Pearson, Naomi'

Thank you Naomi
The problem with this is that
1. I required to be notified of the date of the hearing
2. I required to have my representation in attendance
3. This appears to have been dealt with by the bar who is BIASED in their own cause ie a single Judge
4. It would appear yet again to be another void order

My case on my application was required NOT requested .. to be represented!
What right have you or any other Judge to act without notice & to deny my representation??
I will follow up after this has been examined by lawful forensic experts in court process.
Will be in touch soon
Thank you
FAO Dear NAOMI PEARSON 09.03.2015 court delivery manager
I attach another strike out application to STRIKE OUT ALL void orders inclusive of Mrs Justice SWIFT in relation to the case 2MA90015 for CROWN BIAS.
I also attached a copy of letter sent to you by recorded signed for delivery
and by email that has of yet not been responded to on the matter of;
• Receiving a copy of the computerised case management file in relation to 2MA90015
• I reminded you that you have a duty to supply without cost
• I reminded you a Jury could draw the conclusion your failure to provide me something that YOU have an obligation to provide me without charge has created an inference that YOU are failing to disclose information in breach of amongst other things.. the fraud act section 3
• I remind you once more that YOUR failure infers there is no file or that it’s been dealt with in a private business capacity
• I again require the case man computer printout for case 2MA90015 without charge and without delay or an allegation of FAILURE TO DISCLOSE by way of FRAUD may be made.
• In particular I require inclusive of the above the fee receipt of the PANNONE LLP application with their original 1st filings that are court SEALED not stamped
YOUR URGENT response to this matter would be appreciated
mike clarke

MARCH 9 2015 [617850]visits.
mike clarke v CROWN agents
New application sent to the court this morning stating that the BIAS in all orders in 2MA90015 stems from the CROWN and thus a JUDGE is unfit for purpose to judge in this matter without a court de jure/JURY. If i said I want my partner to Judge would that be BIAS of course it would so how can the BAR JUDGE THE BAR?? The commercial LIEN which they want removal is of course against agents of the CROWN. THE BAR is privately owned and operated by THE CROWN so if your claiming against the CROWN/BAR agents there can be only one JUDGEMENT made and that must come from a JURY. BIAS in court is strictly unlawful.

MARCH 8 2015 [617848]visits.
VICTIMS OF JEW PROCESS by Patrick Cullinane
Dear Gentiles and 4% of the Non-Jewish World's Media,
What part of Magna Carta 1215 and your GUARANTEED Constitutional Rights to a Trial by your Peers for EVERY case, Civil, Criminal and Fiscal do you NOT understand?
Are ALL the commenters on here PAID students from Israel, as there is NOT a geeks about the Great Charter, which will save us ALL overnight from this endemic JUDICIAL & POLICE corruption destroying society 24/7 ??? : -
"The students making the posts will not reveal online that they are funded by the Israeli government...
"Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, which will oversee the programme, confirmed its launch…"
If YOU want RELIEF and a REMEDY for this TERRORISM & CORRUPTION; how do YOU think you are going to get it, without DEMANDING your rights in Constitutional Common Law to a Trial by YOUR Peers?
96% of the SATANIC World's Media have brainwashed YOU into believing that England has an 'UNWRITTEN' Constitution: - When are YOU going to WAKE-UP?
Magna Carta 1215 = Trial by Jury = FOREVER: - Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads: “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”
{Article 39} reads: “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”
{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”
{Article 45} reads: “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.
Gods 10 Commandments - Ten Great Laws: 1 John 3:4 "Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and SIN IS LAWLESSNESS."
Psalm 111:7-8 "The works of His hands are verity and justice; all His precepts are sure. THEY STAND FAST FOREVER AND EVER, and are done in truth and uprightness." http://www.gods-10-commandment...
Published on 18 Oct 2012 Steve Sigmond supports your right to a trial by jury. As American citizens, we are entitled to trial by jury. - (Also as Irish & English citizens, we are GUARANTEED a Trial by OUR Peers)
The following is only an example of who has got a STRANGLEHOLD on England, Ireland, America and Australia now: -
Video - Channel 4 UK - Broadcast November 16, 2009 Dispatches: Inside Britain's Israel (Jewish) Lobby Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.
“Realities are turned upside-down and we are told, War is Peace, Magna Carta is UNWRITTEN and the Lie becomes the Truth, effectively that’s what happened”
David Cameron, Nick Clegg - UK Illuminati Puppets Exposed: This is a full length film exposing the most known UK politicians, who claim to be good guys just trying to help 'their country', in actual fact, their illuminati satanic, Freemason Bilderbergers who have no care about the people what so ever, this is a real eye opening look at the "chosen ones" Comment and share please! Get the truth out these scum bags have too much people fooled This documentary is named Right Honorable Gentlemen
Jewish Politicians for Hire. 23 Feb 2015 Dispatches investigates the behaviour of politicians in Westminster Jewish Lawyers: Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Jack Straw cash for access scandal
The following is the fallout of the FRIENDS OF ISRAEL LOBBY in the UK: -
Dafydd Morgan The Zionist Jews & Campaigners looking for Due Process and Natural Justice etc
The following is what is happening to GOOD Police Officers now, as they FAILED to ENFORCE the Law of the Land by NOT arresting SATANIC 'Judges' operating COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts - in TIME: -
Western Mail: By Martin Shipton on 06 February 2008: - ‘I was victimised after I tried to root out police corruption, claims senior officer’
By Tony Farrell: - Former Principle Intelligence Analyst at South Yorkshire Police A NEW WEBSITE WITH A DIFFERENCE
Have you ever wondered why, South Yorkshire Police is experiencing so may woes at the moment?
You will find all the answers on this website: http://jahtalk.thefarrellrepor...
Patrick Cullinane On The Common Law Court Of Wales Show Thursday 26th February 2015. Live at 7pm UK Time 2pm Eastern USA Canada Time.
Along with my comment, I also recommend that YOU peruse and USE "Seven Gate", which is the 11th comment down to PROTECT yourself in these SATANIC Courts; while DEMANDING your GUARANTEED rights in Common Law to a Trial by YOUR Peers: - Serve it on the 'Judge' and DEMAND that your submission is put on the COURT RECORD: -
NOTE: 15 June 2015, is the 800th Anniversary of Magna Carta 1215, which was HIJACKED by a Foreign Power, FRIENDS OF ISRAEL, while our 'Good Police Officers' were either dreaming or CONSPIRING with the ENEMY to NEGATE our English Constitution that protects, We the People, from CORRUPT Government Organisations by a Trial by OUR Peers: -
As I said, WAKE-UP before it is too late! - If you like my comment, vote it UP, as the PAID commenters from Israel will be voting it DOWN!
God works through People; therefore do YOUR bit to get these LAWBREAKERS behind BARS!
Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK's COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

MARCH 8 2015 [617833]visits.

MARCH 7 2015 [617814]visits.


MARCH 7 2015 [617813]visits.

Published on 11 Jul 2014
All BAR Members are foreign agents of the Crown which is a corporation domiciled in the City of London which is owned and operated by the Vatican. The founding fathers tried to eliminate BAR members from American government but failed. This video documents many of their crimes.

MARCH 7 2015 [617800]visits.

Published on 5 Mar 2015
Paul Mobbs attempts to perform a citizen's arrest of members of the Cabinet at Downing Street for their misconduct in public office, in relation to their links and deals over fracking.
The evidence

MARCH 6 2015 [617761]visits.
just click the stamp that's not a SEAL

Click on the stamp that's not a SEAL to look at what the court has created without any notice and without any representation from me they conduct another one of their hearings in their own cause... do the courts just make it up as they go along??
EMAIL reply to court
Thank you Naomi
The problem with this is that
1. I required to be notified of the date of the hearing
2. I required to have my representation in attendance
3. This appears to have been dealt with by the bar who is BIASED in their own cause ie a single Judge
4. It would appear yet again to be another void order

My case on my application was required NOT requested .. to be represented!
What right have you or any other Judge to act without notice & to deny my representation?? I will follow up after this has been examined by lawful forensic experts in court process. Will be in touch soon Thank you Regards mike clarke
totally without merit [TWM] but in actual FACT TOTALLY with merit

MARCH 5 2015 [617724]visits.

@20:45 minutes in & THE vital question?? GET THE FRAUDSTERS OUT OF OUR COURTS

MARCH 4 2015 [617688]visits.
At 3pm to the Police in a recorded interview based on the overall legal abuse suffered whilst being under induced incapacity falling into the trap of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 where the legal criminal fraternity where able to effectively steal his cash and sell his home. Len will also draw attention in this interview to a number of us campaigning to try and gain justice from this tyranny inflicted upon us where prison threats by way of suspended sentences or in our case worse they have been carried out causing us to flee into exile as refugees. This JUDCIAL COURT corruption needs ridding from our system one way or another where innocents are treated with contempt for the law and the court system where clear fraud upon the court is obvious and widespread and JUDGEs are backing up such corruption regardless and without fear because there is no accountability for them thus fear nothing.
This website going back over several years would not take too long to read but each piece of the jigsaw when put together as I have brings the picture gradually into focus and one can see how it is all put together as FRAUD and no other description is needed.
White Collar fraud is one of the most under investigated crimes of all because of PROTECTION and not the protection of the vulnerable but the protection of the CRIMINALS with law degrees.
email from LEN:
Spoke to Gary last night Jean is very active on all our behalfs with the IPCC and others over the failure of the police to investigate. A Det Insp and the Head of Fraud unit are attending my home tomorrow at 1pm to take a statement.

MARCH 3 2015 [617670]visits.
It is important for those involved in court to understand what fraud upon the court is so you can realize when it is happening to you.

Fraud upon the court is important because orders and judgments may be set aside at any time when fraud upon the court is proven. I have seen cases where as many as 60 years later, a judgment was set aside.
The good news is that the rules and case law provide a way to get relief from wrongdoing. The bad news is that it requires a judge to make a finding of fraud, and my experience is that the judges are all guilty, and their fellow judges will cover for them.[MASONIC brotherhood under their masonic oaths swearing allegiance to each other in conflict with the Judges Oath alongside the 1st duty of the BAR being to the court making us, LAST.]
I am not an attorney, and I am not offering legal advice. This article contains my legal research and my experience.
Fraud upon the court is fraud committed by officers of the court. The officers of the court are attorneys, judges, and judicial employees, including the staff of the clerk of the court. In its simplest terms, fraud upon the court is types of actions designed to interfere with the proper functioning and decision-making of a court.
In my experience, I have seen attorneys, judges, and the staff of the clerks of the courts all commit fraud upon the court, and there was at the very least a conspiracy between the judges and the clerk of the court's office. All of this was part of unconscionable schemes designed to improperly influence the courts in their decisions.

Realize that the employees of the office of the clerk of the court are all officers of the court. When the clerk's office fails to docket your filings, changes docket entries, backdates docket entries, and issues invalid orders that do not bear the signature of the clerk and the seal of the court, these are all acts that are grounds for a finding of fraud upon the court. I have been amazed at the extent of the fraud perpetrated against me by the office of the clerk of the court. This article focuses on federal court, but many states have similar statutes.
I will always file actions attempting to set aside orders and judgments when I can prove fraud upon the courts. Before you do so, realize that corrupt judges will probably punish you by awarding massive legal fees sanctions against you. My experience is that judges ignore the facts, ignore the law, commit crimes regularly, and will do anything to damage and stop anyone from attempting to prove fraud upon the court.

MARCH 3 2015 [617654]visits.
HAS yet to hit the headlines. Len was also a poisoned pilot and nearly died from such but survived, but whilst incapcitated was abused dreadfully by the legal criminal fraternity under the guise of PROTECTION. Len was cash & asset stripped as well as effectively tortured under the mental capacity act the same as us. Now friends for some years as equal campaigners a Judge has ordered the Police to take a full statement from LEN about the legal abuse he has had to suffer. Len has requested it all be recorded and at which point he is going to include us within that statement and others. When Len came round from induced incapacity he awoke to find his money had been stolen and his house had been SOLD??

FEB 28 2015 [617600]visits.
Attention Support engineer & Senior support Michael Benson Jr
To be faxed to head office president and CEO DAVID BROWN
The matter is now resolved.
I resolved it myself.
After 11 days of suffering at the hands of I am extremely disappointed in you.
You and your engineers knew full well it was related to the IP address and also that how simple it is to change your IP address that was never conveyed… I wonder why??
It goes to show how there is I believe a very suspicious underlying conspiracy to disrupt my service in any way possible.
I am now still awaiting from you the information your engineer had on the so-called blacklisted reasons as to why??
This could have been easily resolved by you 11 days ago!
Though I await a reply to this email and the one before it I file this in its entirety to be called upon if needed.
Mike Clarke

FEB 27 2015 [617553]visits.
Distributed Denial of Service Attack (DDoS) Definition. A denial of service (DoS) attack is a malicious attempt to make a server or a network resource unavailable to users, usually by temporarily interrupting or suspending the services of a host connected to the Internet.
It would apear our IP address has been sabotaged and at this stage we do not know who by but we intend to investigate. There has been several attempts to shut me up over the years and especially this site but we will continue to fight you all the way.
We have paid for a 1st class optic fibre connection to the internet but just one section of our service has been attacked.. that being the upload connection to our website server... not the download... JUST THE UPLOAD... stopping me from updating this website... NOW... I wonder why???

FEB 25 2015 [617520]visits.
To assert my rights for FULL DISCLOSURE and a STRIKE OUT of a VOID ORCER of COMMITTAL to prison by the poor conduct of Judge PELLING who's conduct was calculated to prejudice the case in his own cause.
Dear Mr Clarke,
I have been advised from the team processing your fee remission application form that it will be refused in its current format.
As previously mentioned you have indicated on the form that you are claiming under Remission 1 and Remission 2. You can only claim under one remission. If you are not pursuing the application under Remission 1 you will need to confirm this in writing.
If you continue to claim under Remission 2 you must provide documentary evidence in accordance with the guidance set out in the EXT160 booklet. You have provided one month banks statement. Three months bank statements are required. I also note from your previous email that certain items within your statements are monies deposited for your mother. Written evidence from DWP is required confirming your mother is in receipt of these benefits. Documentary evidence would also need to be provided to support the different incomes you receive. Without this information your application would be refused.
In addition an address also needs to be provided. This does not need to be included on the form but it must be provided in the form of a utility bill, phone bill, or council tax bill. As above if this information is not provided the application will be refused.
I wanted to provide you with the opportunity to provide the correct information so that the application is not refused; however, I can ask the team to continue processing your application form in its current form as per your previous request?
I shall await your response.

From: Mike Clarke [] Sent: 20 February 2015 15:06
To: Pearson, Naomi

At this government website link; You will see the picture below indicating the current CARERS ALLOWANCE rate of £61.35p weekly Multiplied by 52 weeks = £3190.20p divide by 12 months is £265.85p as my sole income.
This representing my sole income as proved by the bank statement provided to you. On the bank statement are 2 other monthly payments that are my mother’s pension and her DLA paid to this account as her appointee and so are for her not me.
This should in my opinion be adequate proof of my fee remission application which I assume to be fee remission No 2.
Being in EXILE from a corrupt court action has left us in a position that become s extremely difficult to obtain any other proof as one expects you may be able to appreciate if you try and therefore we are expecting the court to take this into consideration of extenuating circumstances.
Additional to the above I fully understand that any signed fee remission form that is not signed in truth is likely to lead to a case of fraud and so accepting such potential liabilities should be sufficient to process the application without further delays to which I feel is what the court is actively doing with respect.
I make this application as it currently stands and I require that this application be processed on its current merit and or extenuating circumstances explained.
Regards Mike Clarke

Dear Mr Clarke,
I have passed your application over to the relevant team for processing, as it currently stands as per your request.
Naomi Pearson
Delivery Manager
High Court & Enforcements
Manchester County Court
Tel: 0161 240 5357

FEB 25 2015 [617490]visits.
Because the conduct of the JUDICIAL COMPLAINT OFFICE matches the conduct of the Judge being complained about where there delays prevarication and conspiracy to add to the perversion of justice continues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Clarke [] Sent: 25 February 2015 12:38
To: ''
Subject: Data from jaco-conduct-complaint-form

Dear Judy who JUDGEs JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT??? JCIO 25.02.2015
The 1st duty of a member of the BAR ie SOLICITORs or JUDGEs is to the COURT is it not?
WHEN the Court ie COURT of PROTECTION is accused of allegations of FRAUD, THEFT, MALADMINISTRATION & PERVERTING JUSTICE… would one be wrong to consider that its ONLY course of FAIRNESS, IMPARTIALITY and UNBIAS would be by JURY??
IS it not EASY to understand that a NOMINATED COURT OF PROTECTION Judge,.. in this instant PELLING is a BIAS leading to UNFAIR & IMPARTIAL CONDUCT
CONDUCT which is calculated to prejudice the outcome and or to delay prevaricate & PERVERT real JUSTICE in a system that CLEARLY is a CRIMINAL CARTEL of which you too are an active PARTY by vicarious liability ATTACHED.
Your wilful refusal to deal effectively with obvious misconduct demonstrates that you are being controlled by higher POWERS of a CRIMINAL CARTEL nature!
no-one in their right mind needs another JUDGE or JUDICIAL ‘review’ to see very clearly what we are here talking about.
THE EVIDENCE is already before YOU!
YOU can ignore this and you can file it where you like BUT I assure you it will be published today as a record of WILFUL NEGLIGENCE FAILURE in your duty of care to properly complete & secure action against one JUDGE that with others… YOU are protecting!
Regards Mike Clarke

From: Anckorn, Judy [] Sent: 25 February 2015 10:16 To: 'Mike Clarke' Cc: ''; 'Jean James'; 'len lawrence'; ''; ''; ''; 'Kathy Danby'; 'Norman Scarth' Subject: RE: JCIO 20333/2015 &2034/2015
Dear Mr Clarke,
I have explained that the only way to challenge judicial decisions is through the court process. Only a senior court can determine whether a judge was bias, should have recused himself etc. These are not matters for this office to determine. If following an appeal or judicial review the senior court considers that the judge’s behaviour in managing the case or reaching a decision has been so poor so as to potentially amount to judicial misconduct the matter may then be referred to this office for investigation.
This office does not refer cases to the Ombudsman. Please refer to for details of how to make your complaint to him.
I am sorry that this office is unable to assist you. Any further correspondence in this regard will be filed without acknowledgment or reply.
Yours sincerely Judith Anckorn I Head of the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, Press and Communications I 81 - 82 Queens Building I Royal Courts of Justice I Strand I London WC2A 2LL I Phone: 020 7073 4719 I

________________________________________ From: Mike Clarke [] Sent: 25 February 2015 08:44 To: Anckorn, Judy
Cc:; 'Jean James'; 'len lawrence';;;; 'Kathy Danby'; 'Norman Scarth' Subject: RE: JCIO 20333/2015 &2034/2015
FAO Judith Anckorn I Head of the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office 25.02.2015
In the 1st instance I object profusely to your comment . “The issues you raise relate to judicial decisions and case management which this office is unable to investigate.” My reasons for doing so is that your office refers to JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATIONS that being so it is the conduct of this JUDGE that is in serious question here!
1. He has failed to acknowledge what was placed before him by RECUSING HIMSELF.
2. He claimed to have read what was placed before him but that this, must be impossible , because having read such documentation he should have recused himself or ordered a trial by JURY, for BIAS being the obvious reason.
3. IT IS his CONDUCT and I repeat CONDUCT in this matter that is what I complain about.
4. His decision was VOID.
5. But his CONDUCT is clear he is UNFIT to be in a JUDICIAL position and it is by your own description, your DUTY to deal with poor CONDUCT is it NOT??
6. Surely you are NOT just another PUPPET of this criminal CARTEL of the system.
7. JUSTICE needs to be seen to BE done and MR PELLINGS conduct has prevented that. IN FACT the word is PERVERTED it!! PERVERTED THE COURSE OF JUSTICE!!
8. WHAT kind of CONDUCT are you allowing the world to see??
9. PLEASE do not underestimate my intelligence by insulting me in this way, by wanting me to accept what you have written.
10. I am completely dissatisfied YES and I wish you to re-examine it AND if you will NOT then YES please refer it to the OMBUDSMAN for me.
THE COMMITTAL ORDER/warrant must be rescinded immediately. I should NOT have to APPEAL anything I am INNOCENT and I also AM so-called protected under the MENTAL CAPACITY ACT SECTION 5 and it should never have happened which your JUDGE knew about but yet his conduct of unadulterated TYRANNY pushed him to continue to act with impunity as we can see here there is NO investigations on poor CONDUCT what has he or any other JUDGE to fear??
IT IS AN UTTER AND COMPLETE DISGRACE what you are in effect party to!
Regards Mike Clarke

From: Anckorn, Judy [] Sent: 24 February 2015 18:11 To: '' Subject: JCIO 20333/2015 &2034/2015
Dear Mr Clarke,
I refer to your e-mail correspondence with Mr Huston dated 21, 25 January and 1 February 15 which have been passed to me for consideration. I apologise for the delay in reply.
I have considered your original complaint and Ms Huston’s response dated 21 January 15. I am satisfied that Ms Huston has correctly assessed and dismissed your complaint. The issues you raise relate to judicial decisions and case management which this office is unable to investigate. This is because judges are independent and must be free to make decisions without interference from government ministers, officials, or even other judges unless they are presiding over the case. The only way to challenge judicial decisions is through the court process such as an appeal or judicial review.
I note that you state you have referred your allegations of fraud to the police and that they have declined to take these matters forward. This office has no remit to investigate allegations of criminal activity, this is a matter for the police, I note that the police have declined to investigate your allegations, this office cannot comment as to whether or not they were right to do so.
If you remain dissatisfied with the way in which this office has handled your complaint you may write to the Judicial Appointment and Conduct Ombudsman. The Ombudsman’s remit and contact details are set out in Ms Huston’s letter of 21 January 15 or can be found at
Yours sincerely
Judith Anckorn I Head of the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, Press and Communications I 81 - 82 Queens Building I Royal Courts of Justice I Strand I London WC2A 2LL

FEB 24 2015 [617470]visits.

FEB 23 2015 [617460]visits.
Black Magic, Demons & Cestui Que Vie. LOSE THE NAME

FEB 22 2015 [617450]visits.
UNFORTUNATELY we do believe this linked to the controversy surrounding our website that is revealing the shocking truth about the tyranical JUDICIAL system in the UK destroying family lives with impunity and is all linked to this disruption yet to be resolved!! read the full 19 pages endured in the link above so far...

FEB 21 2015 [617448]visits.

FEB 20 2015 [617446]visits.
Dear Mr Clarke,
We are unable to take any action with regards to your application because it is unclear which remission you wish to seek, remission 1 or remission 2?
You are also required to provide the correct supporting evidence with the fee remission application regardless of the type of remission you wish to apply.
I have attached the relevant guidance for your reference and assistance.

At this government website link; You will see the picture below indicating the current CARERS ALLOWANCE rate of £61.35p weekly Multiplied by 52 weeks = £3190.20p divide by 12 months is £265.85p as my sole income.
This representing my sole income as proved by the bank statement provided to you. On the bank statement are 2 other monthly payments that are my mother’s pension and her DLA paid to this account as her appointee and so are for her not me. This should in my opinion be adequate proof of my fee remission application which I assume to be fee remission No 2.
Being in EXILE from a corrupt court action has left us in a position that become s extremely difficult to obtain any other proof as one expects you may be able to appreciate if you try and therefore we are expecting the court to take this into consideration of extenuating circumstances.
Additional to the above I fully understand that any signed fee remission form that is not signed in truth is likely to lead to a case of fraud and so accepting such potential liabilities should be sufficient to process the application without further delays to which I feel is what the court is actively doing with respect.
I make this application as it currently stands and I require that this application be processed on its current merit and or extenuating circumstances explained.
Mike Clarke

FEB 19 2015 [617420]visits.
From: Mike Clarke []
Sent: 19 February 2015 12:05
To: Pearson, Naomi; Kelly, Ged
1. That you have indeed received the N244 application and
2. That action is now being taken
Mike Clarke
From: Pearson, Naomi []
Sent: 19 February 2015 13:24
To: 'Mike Clarke'
Dear Mr Clarke,
Your application has been received.
Your application cannot be actioned because the application has to made as per your original claim. Judge Pelling is not the Defendant; therefore he is not the person to serve the application against.
Naomi Pearson

I am sorry but I do not understand??
Then who is the defendant??
The court made a VOID order so who is the defendant??
The court under the instruction of PELLING acted in a manner of ULTRA VIRES meaning FLAWED.
A flawed order has no defendant does it??
Mike Clarke
AMENDED N244 here returned to the court FULL APPLICATION

FEB 19 2015 [617414]visits.

Knowing full well in all correspondence that we are in exile the court writes a letter to our home address!! DO they read mail??
Further to my return email 20 minutes ago. I fail to understand if you have read the documentation it is clear that the JDUGE PELLING acted ULTRA VIRUS making a VOID ORDER of Committal to PRISON.
VOID ORDERS are to be set aside by the court that made them NOT by APPEAL COURTS
By the fact I am writing to you would it not be prudent to note that I am in fact in EXILE from such corrupt activity and clearly NOT sat at our home address in the UK and therefore WHY WRITE A LETTER TO THAT ADDRESS??
I attach your letter to that address for the benefit of others copied in to this.
I also attached again for the court the 2 very important APPLICATIONS.
2. A REQUIREMENT UNDER CPR 5.4.2 computerised CASEMAN file
Your acts, by not responding to these applications is a clear act of ‘FRAUD by CONCEALMENT’
I require you act immediately.
Mike Clarke
n244 form NOW SENT BY RETURN here

FEB 18 2015 [617389]visits.
Criticism: Sir James Munby, the most senior family court judge in England and Wales, said the council should not see itself as 'guardians of morality' Criticism: Sir James Munby, the most senior family court judge in England and Wales, said the council should not see itself as 'guardians of morality'
Social workers were accused by a senior judge of ‘social engineering’ after trying to take a child for adoption because his father was involved with the English Defence League.
They decided that the far-Right political group was ‘barbaric’ and the 25-year-old man’s views were ‘immoral’.
He should not be allowed to bring up his child because the boy needed ‘an environment that supports difference, equality and independence’, they said.
But Sir James Munby, the country’s most senior family judge, blocked the adoption, ruling that the father’s failure to be a good role model did not justify taking his child away

FEB 17 2015 [617360]visits.

Sick of waiting for answers I file a compressed version of the application in electronic email form to attempt to get the ball rolling.
Dear Ged
Having waited for the hard copy to appear nearly 2 weeks I here by have compressed the file to within your limits and now is hereby attached
Mike Clarke
READ the email here

FEB 17 2015 [617344]visits.

For two years, Lord Justice Munby, the head of our family courts, has been heroically fighting to restore some semblance of justice and common sense to our horribly secretive and corrupted “child protection” system, which I have been reporting on here since 2009 as one of the most shocking scandals in Britain today.
Two weeks ago, Munby again made headlines when he and two other judges in the Appeal Court magisterially tore apart a Liverpool judge, Robert Dodds, for his handling of a case-management hearing involving an intelligent boy, described as an “over-achiever” at school, who was desperate to return to live with his mother.
In 2012, Liverpool social workers sent the boy to live with his abusive father, who was sent to jail for assaulting him. They then placed him miserably in 14 different foster homes. The social workers were now considering that it might be best for him to return to his mother. But Dodds refused to hear any evidence and, without issuing a formal judgment or even giving his reasons, instantly ordered that the boy must remain in care.
After highly critical rulings from the other two judges, Munby weighed in by saying that he wished to emphasise two “important” points. The first was that it is “one of the oldest principles of our law”, going back 400 years, that “no one is to be condemned unheard”. Any “parent faced with the removal of their child must be entitled to make their case to the court”; and if they wish “to give evidence in answer to a local authority’s care application”, they must be permitted to do so. Secondly “there is the right to confront one’s accusers”, and to cross-examine any important witness on whose evidence the local authority is relying. Judge Dodds’s adoption of such a “ruthlessly truncated process” in this case was “fundamentally unprincipled and unfair”.
Just when Munby was making these points another case came my way which, as so often in the family courts, stood those fundamental principles on their head. A woman in Wales, after being made pregnant from a rape, lived for some years with the father, who continued to treat her so violently that she eventually fled with her son to a women’s refuge. They then began living happily with a new partner by whom she had two more sons. Because of her past involvement in violence, however, Denbighshire social workers intervened to say that, unless she handed over her oldest son to his father, they would also remove her other two boys. She had no choice but to obey.

FEB 16 2015 [617330]visits.
AT christmas grandma Kathy of 72 was arrested and thrown into prison... plucked uncerimoniously from a Ken Dodd concert in Liverpool. Kathy here goes into more details of her exhausting and humiliating treatment at the hands of the STAZI state of the Britain. Treatment like this needs to be seriously addressed as it is becoming common place in Britain where it is totally and utterly unjustified and often more in reality without warrant what so ever. These actions should start to wake up the majority into the kind of Britain we are now living in. Tyrants in the form of judges are totally out of control.

FEB 14 2015 [617299]visits.

FEB 13 2015 [617263]visits.


FEB 10 2015 [617197]visits.

A High Court judge has ordered the name of a woman sent to prison to be kept from the public – despite rules saying no one should be jailed in secret.
Mrs Justice Roberts defied instructions from Britain’s most senior judges by banning her from being identified.
The single mother, who was jailed for seven days for contempt of court, was suspected of planning to flee the UK to stop social workers taking her daughter into care.
She was found guilty after failing to surrender her passport and the girl’s on a court’s orders.
The High Court judge ruled that European human rights law overrides the British ban on secret imprisonment. She said the mother’s name must be suppressed to protect the privacy of her daughter, who is in the care of social workers in London.
Her decision to order reporting restrictions was made despite guidance laid down in the Appeal Court less than two years ago on the authority of the most senior judge, the Lord Chief Justice.
Mrs Justice Roberts made her ruling after being reminded by lawyers about the Appeal Court directions.
It means the courts have returned to the practice of secret imprisonment that is thought to have ended in 2013 after the Mail revealed the case of Wanda Maddocks. Miss Maddocks was jailed for trying to remove her father from a care home where she thought his life was in danger, against a judge’s orders. The public were forbidden to know her name or any details of her case.
In May 2013, then Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge and President of the Family Division Sir James Munby declared whenever someone is jailed for contempt they should be publicly named, saying: ‘There are no exceptions.’

FEB 10 2015 [617195]visits.

The Slovakian government has such 'serious concern' over the workings of Britain’s 'family protection' system that it plans to challenge the legality of the policy in Strasbourg
In an unprecedented move, a foreign government is threatening to take Britain to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) to challenge the unusual readiness of our social workers and courts to remove children from their parents for “no sound reason”. So disturbed is the government of Slovakia by the number of Slovak parents who have lost their children in Britain in recent years that its justice ministry has posted a declaration highly critical of Britain on its website and says that, if a decision of the Appeal Court this Tuesday goes against one Slovak family, it will back an appeal to the Strasbourg court that Britain has acted illegally.

FEB 9 2015 [617154]visits.

You could'nt make it up could you??

FEB 9 2015 [617140]visits.
Edmond Dantes wrote...
Hi Mike, having concluded the family court and cps are corrupt, corrupt and criminal, I spent a year in prison on remand getting a family case moved to the criminal crown court. In the family court, they allowed and covered up sexual abuse of children and physical abuses, emotional abuses and multiple acts of perjury by social workers.
It is a waste of time trying to get the family court to recognise it's criminal acts against children and parents.
So, in the Crown Court in front of a jury, I will give hard evidence of multiple acts of criminality by social services, their bosses at chief executive level and also of a family court judge.
This should have a domino effect to other local authorities and their social services. Net result, remove, and hopefully imprison many of these abusive criminals.

FEB 8 2015 [617107]visits.
Parents branded child abusers by NHS 'bullies'... simply for refusing a heel prick test on their newborn baby .. Midwife visited Tony Shephard and his fiancee Viola after Charlie was born... She said she would perform heel prick test, but did not fully explain why.. Couple asked if they could research and decide whether they wanted it.. What came next drove loving parents to flee Britain for Poland in despair .. It should have been the most joyous moment of their lives, one they would look back on fondly for years to come. But for Tony Shepherd and his Polish fiancee Viola, the weeks after the birth of their baby were filled with disbelief, followed by desperation and finally outright terror – when a small act of perfectly legal defiance led the NHS to brand them child abusers. The couple could never have imagined that their refusal to have a simple heel prick test for their son would escalate into a full-blown investigation by midwives, social workers and even the police; or that before their son Charlie was even three weeks old, he would have to endure two intimate internal examinations. Read more in the link about NAZI state Britain

FEB 7 2015 [617081]visits.
Linda Taylor... Update for anyone who intended to come to Hereford for Guys Bodenham case on Monday 9th and Tues 10th of February. The case has been adjourned until June - The one police officer who Guy wishes to cross examine claims to be on holiday then so it has been re scheduled. We are planning to put in a motion to dismiss before June, and will keep everyone updated. So case will not be going ahead on Monday xxxx

FEB 6 2015 [617045]visits.

Has by recorded delivery yesterday received my application to set aside the void commital order placed upon my legal fiction 2 years ago on 14.01.2013 causing us to flee into exile as refugees from corruption and this site will update every step of the way any further corrupt activity coming out from that court of most definate fraud.

RECORDED DELIVERY 5/2/2015 then FAXED & EMAILED on 10/2/2015

FEB 4 2015 [616921]hits.
To: Norman Scarth (Holder of the Arctic Star for service during WW2 on Royal Navy Russian Arctic Convoys)
Dear Norman,
'RUSSIA’S POLITICAL HOSPITALS: The Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union'
When I read in national newspapers and magazines of concerns being raised by some senior members of the judiciary surrounding the secrecy of the Court of Protection and the abuse of psychiatry in the United Kingdom Justice system, also the comments of the President of the Court of Protection Lord Justice Sir James Munby, that it is not him that is keeping the Court of Protection secret but Government Ministers one has to ask is the Court of Protection being used by some as Britain's Political Hospital ?
There are some very good judges within the Court of Protection as we have seen recently, equally I question was it really necessary for HHJ Cardinal, Nominated Judge of the Court of Protection, to jail Kathy Danby a 71 year old pensioner for hugging her disabled granddaughter ? NO!
Norman at 90 years of age, you requested last year to be allowed to return to England to attend a funeral without the risk of being certified as mentally ill, your request fell on deaf ears. We have a mutual friend the former SAS soldier Ben Griffin and Veterans for Peace coordinator. Ben refused to return to Iraq and left the Army, citing not only the "illegal" tactics but other issues. I was with Ben and others just prior to Christmas when former SAS S/SGT Steve Pratt gave a presentation:
The presentation was video recorded, including Steve Pratt talking about the sexual abuse he was subjected to at his private school. My dad who like you also served in the Royal Navy on Russian Arctic Convoys died before he received his medal, it was given to me last year by the MOD.
Norman I also served in the Royal Navy having left with an exemplary discharge, but in the secret United Kingdom Family Courts I am accused of being mentally ill and a liar. I was not allowed access to a Nominated Judge of the Court of Protection. Interestingly why had the Security Services allow me to fly senior members of the Royal Family, former Prime Ministers and foreign Heads of State including the Irish Prime Minister xxxx
Was I certified because I and others were solving the puzzle of organophosphate poisoning in the military, aviation and farming etc? Norman did you know that one in four homeless personal in London are ex military, disproportional number of ex-military are in prison. Why when it has now been identified that organophosphates were used in the first Gulf War are our ex service personnel not being test for chemical poisoning like the americans and myself. Could it be that it is preferable to give a false psychiatric diagnoses then asset strip them.
The emails in blue below are from ordinary people living in the United Kingdom !
Norman, I have not forgotten yours and Peter Hofschroer (Presently in prison for exposing abuse) very kind offers of accommodation when I came under attack from three Government Agencies. This appears to have been stopped at a very high level. I have no reason to disbelieve the Metropolitan Police when they informed me that it was the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts that had caused me my problems. I now know why I was attacked!!
Kindest regards Leonard Lawrence
Subject: Re: Is this widespread throughout the UK? I think it is
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:35:13 +0000
Len, I think these practice seem to be common in some cases a monk's brain injury victims, and now also the elderly that can be exploited. I know that my wife was sent to a mental centre rather then a rehab Hospital for her brain injuries. I feel all of this information need to be collated on a worldwide Forum somewhere, so all of this information that is extremely useful in the future is not lost.
The psychiatrists at the centre said that my wife should not be there, but the referrals seem to come from those above them and there seem to be nothing they can do about it, I'm sure there are aware about what is happening but afraid to do anything about it, one of the psychiatrists told me these are the sort of things that are happening when there is huge corporations an insurance companies involve. _
_______________________________________ From: Norman To:Len
Subject: Sane people in Nuthouses? Widespread? It certainly is!
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 10:32:56 +0000
Your correspondent asks if the Stalinist practice of incarcerating sane people in Nuthouses is widespread in the UK. It certainly is! Blow the whistle on corruption (particularly by the Legal/Judicial Mafia) & you are likely to end up in a 'Mental Hospital' the liquid cosh used to erase 'wrong thoughts' from your mind!
Tell your correspondent to look up 'Fixated Threat Assessment Centre' (FTAC) a product of the Lawyer Blair's Regime. Then to get hold of the book, 'RUSSIA’S POLITICAL HOSPITALS: The Abuse of Psychiatry in the Soviet Union' by Professor Sidney Bloch & Peter Reddaway (available on Amazon). It was published in 1977, at the height of the Cold War, but virtually everything in it is happening in Britain now. Perhaps the most telling words from Bloch & Reddaway were in the EPILOGUE. I quote from it now:
"WE BELIEVE THAT there is now ample evidence to show that psychiatry in the Soviet Union is being used systematically to suppress dissent. Sane citizens are interned in mental hospitals for indeterminate periods until they learn to confirm. Prior to their internment they have, in most cases, functioned efficiently in society, and their families, friends and colleagues have regarded them as mentally healthy. We estimate that the scale on which dissenters have been unjustly interned is small in relation to the number of the imprisoned in labour camps... But we also believe that this phenomenon is an integral part of a much wider abuse of psychiatry, which involves the labeling of many forms of social deviance as mental illness. If this is so, then our book has examined only the tip of a very large iceberg. Whatever the scale, however, numbers are not of the essence. The direct victims of the Nazi medical experiments were not especially numerous, and only 350 out of 90,000 German doctors are reckoned to have committed crimes.[i] Yet had Hitler’s regime survived and expanded its empire, the number of victims and anti-human doctors would probably have multiplied exponentially.
We are further convinced that that the treatment of some dissenters in Soviet mental hospitals is not only barbaric and degrading but also sinister. Attempts to extract recantations with the aid of drugs bring Soviet psychiatry to almost the same moral territory as that occupied by the Nazis. The victim is sacrificed to corrupt medicine twice: first his views are ruled to be those of a madman, then he undergoes forcible “treatment” to be purged of them.
If such practices are not resisted, they may become irretrievably entrenched and, at the same time, spread gradually to other countries. For they have an obvious potential appeal not only to repressive regimes of left and right, but also to authoritarian groups in what are still relatively free societies.
It is not surprising, we feel, that medicine should have been worst abused in the two most powerful totalitarian states yet produced by history."
You may also like to send your correspondent my Andy MCardle leaflet .
Norman Scarth

FEB 4 2015 [616916]hits.
Dear UK Refugees
Covered up child abuses in Chester
33 days to go before the trial starts that will show with evidence that -
social services - entire division up to and including chief executive family court - including 3 judges cafes - including managers police - officers, ppu, pps and including crime commissioner and chief constable solicitors, barristers ALL commited - perjury, carried out extensive harassment, Smeared, lied, abused power, covered up and propagated sexual abuse, covered up and propagated child abuse, The list of abuses was so long and extensive that a clinical psychiatrist in tilly thought that i must be deluded and then after seeing the evidence he was horrified at the corruption of the above authorities.
Come to Chester on the 9, 10, 11 March and witness the most corrupt and criminal authorities in England.
Tom Dobbie
14 Old Hall Drive
Ellesmere Port
Cheshire CH65 9AX

FEB 3 2015 [616891]hits. CHIT CHAT on the NET
Thank you Len.
I can believe this is happening throughout the UK.
I was referred to a Mental Hospital by a GP I'd had no knowledge of. I hadn't seen a doctor for three years and the referral was made by a doctor (after I requested proof of why I'd been referred to a mental hospital) stated he'd received a phone call stating I was acting strangely and a danger to myself.
At the age of 71 my Human Rights were being unlawfully abused by the medical profession. After asking for proof of why I was referred to a mental hospital, non was provided. Not only were the local 'cabal' (as I refer to these people) after my home but they were also after having me certified 'unsafe and a danger to myself'.
Is this widespread throughout the UK? I think it is. I witnessed similar things happening to various elderly people. One day they are fit and healthy, still working etc. The next day, without warning they are sick and a danger to themselves! Or having a rest in a home or hospital - and suddenly die.
Often their homes are bought by estate agents or possibly the very person who reported them as being a 'danger to themselves.
xxxxx Sent from my iPhone
How utterly deplorable at the age of 71 what life holds for you!

FEB 2 2015 [616833]hits. FRAUD BY CONCEALMENT
1st REQUEST FOR CASEMAN FILE made [1st Oct 2014]

recorded delivery receipt KR683854947GB - track delivered 3/2/2015

FEB 1 2015 [616814]hits.
How much evidence does one require for the JUDGE to issue his PURGE of contempt for Her Majesties Courts in a letter of apology to the affected and is he going to do it through his own Conscience - [is an aptitude, faculty, intuition or judgment that assists in distinguishing right from wrong. Moral judgment may derive from values or norms (principles and rules)]. FILED
recorded delivery receipt KR683854933GB - track delivered 5/2/2015

JAN 31 2015 [616801]hits. ROGER HAYES ON BANK FRAUD

JAN 30 2015 [616749]hits.

JAN 29 2015 [616694]hits.
HUMAN RIGHTS article 6 section 3C

Dear Mr Clarke,
As you know, your application to the Unit has not been successful. I have received a letter from you dated 27 January (and an email of the same date in similar terms). You have followed this with an email dated 29 January.
Neither I nor the Unit responds to the terms of any of these communications, and neither you (nor anyone else) is entitled to treat this as the Unit's (or my) 'tacit agreement' to such terms.
The same will be the case as regards any further communication from you.
I repeat: you should not expect any acknowledgement or response by the Unit to any further communication from you. The Unit will correspond further with you only as it sees fit.
Yours sincerely, Rebecca Wilkie Chief Executive

Thank you for your reply, albeit lacking in consideration of the points put before you in several emails. Regards Mike

JAN 29 2015 [616682]hits.

Appeal & Damages claim to be filed soon taking into account all of the tyranicidal issues raised by the un-fettered abhorrent rules of the court of protection that are ruining peoples lives by breaching several human rights such as articles 6 section 3c, 8, & 10 in the repressive manner of duty of care failure to criminal standards of corrupt cullusion. WHY self representation you might say... well we have come to understand that there must exist a legal blacklist where certain individuals cannot get any legal representation and I am not alone there seem to be many with the same problem giving weight to that fact and added to the evidence within the PRO BONO article linked below where apparently there has been a 30% increase in applications for help with legal representation and of them they have placed 86% with charity help from barrister but yet 14% are left in no mans land in which we are in, this further indicating that there is in our opinion and others a LEGAL BLACK LIST

JAN 28 2015 [616627]hits.
These 2 letters are dispatched again today.
LINK to letter to Sir James Munby President of the court of protection & this man said that people are "trapped" in a system which is "neither compassionate nor even humane", the most senior family court judge in England and Wales Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the cases raised human rights issues relating to people's entitlements to a fair trial and to respect for family life. But yet he cannot even reply to his letters.
29/01/2015 from
Dear Mr Clarke
Thank you for your letter.
The President can only deal with cases that come before him in a judicial capacity; he cannot give advice on or comment on decisions made by other judges.
Yours sincerely, Joanna Wilkinson| Assistant Private Secretary to the President of the Family Division| Room WG23 Royal Courts of Justice| London WC2A 2LL
Dear Joanna
Is it possible to request to bring a case before him?
Regards Mike

I am sorry that I cannot advise you. In order for any judge to hear a matter there would need to be a formal application made to the correct court. Cases are listed before the appropriate level of judiciary. I regret that I cannot assist you further and would suggest that you seek legal advice or procedural advice from the relevant court office.
Best wishes
Joanna Wilkinson

Dear Joanna
Thank you for your prompt reply.
I have not been able to get any legal representation like many others seeking remedy and most of us are now believing there exists some sort of LEGAL BLACKLIST.
Procedural advice from the concerning court ie Manchester Civil Justice centre appears to be operating on a similar basis of refusing to cooperate with requests ie an authority was issued to supply a copy of the computor court file on case 2MA90015 as far back as 1st October 2014 but to this day has never been received.
Under CPR rules I know that 5.4.2 rule states that such a request for this information must be given within 48 hours but yet NOTHING! Has arrived.
There seems to be little to nothing, one can do to get JUSTICE.
Needless to say, I realise that as in many other replies, it is probably BEYOND YOUR REMIT, but, thank you for your time.

LINK to letter to pelling QC and treasonous so called judge committing contempt himself within his own court. A man without authority to do as he did.
proof of letter delivered 2nd time


JAN 27 2015 [616577]hits.
Dear Mr Clarke,
Ms Heald has referred your emails of 23, 24 and 25 January to me.
You appear to be asking the Unit for legal advice. Neither the Unit nor the reviewing barrister give legal advice to applicants to the Unit. Only were an application to the Unit to be successful would the Unit endeavour to find a barrister who would then provide legal assistance directly to such an applicant. Your application to the Unit has not been successful.
The name of the reviewing barrister is considered confidential to the Unit and to the reviewing barrister; that is the case as regards every application to the Unit and the reviewing barrister who considers the application.
You appear to be using your correspondence with the Unit as part of a campaign you are conducting via your website. The Unit has no wish to facilitate this through further correspondence with you.
As such, you should not expect any acknowledgement or response by the Unit to any further emails from you. The Unit will correspond further with you only as it sees fit.
Yours sincerely,
Rebecca Wilkie
Chief Executive Bar Pro Bono Unit
More proof that when the direct relevant questions are asked they cannot answer with the truth because their 1st duty is to the corrupt court! "BIAS!"

27/01/2015 Dear Rebecca CEO
With deep respect, I refer to your email below and the previous one with the now remaining unknown reviewing Barristers comments, particularly where he makes comment as to having NO MERIT in the case of committal.
I consider that I am not asking for advice, I am simply taking issue with whether or not there IS IN FACT merit in a case to bring of VOID order which it seems to me to be very, very PERTINENT.
The questions asked, you obviously do not want to answer because YOU KNOW, do have merit, but I believe because your overall 1st duty is to the corrupt court you do not want this matter to be addressed from the correct way in JUSTICE terms.
I believe out of BIAS, a void order has been made, why is it the PRO BONO so called charity will not answer the relevant pertinent questions which are not advice, they are LEGAL VALID statements of fact giving a lot of so called MERIT to a case you say has NONE. WHY? Is the question we want answered.
Why does it have no merit? And why do you not want to answer that Question based on the obvious BIAS the court displayed.
OR is it that your PRO BONO UNIT of Charity is just another false flag of ongoing corruption! Offering victims support but then pulling the carpet from under them in order to further try to demoralise them into submission which I will never do until I get the answers.
I think your attitude as CEO has a distinct lack of respect for the vulnerable whom might look to you for assistance.
You can ignore my questions all you like, but until my valid points are explained fully as to why they have NO MERIT I believe they are FULL OF MERIT your just trying to hide and brush over that fact your denial of answers on your so called " we do not offer advice".
MERIT is what we are talking about MERIT!
Regards Mike Clarke

Failure to respond will be classed as TACIT AGREEMENT

follow up email from LEN LAWRENCE
Those very naughty leprechauns also visited the Bar Standards Board remote access computer files see attachment.
Barrister Caroline Wilbourne had informed the Bar Standards Board investigation that I had recovered mental capacity so the Court of Protection was not necessary. Barrister Caroline Wilbourne later refused to swear an affidavit that I had recovered mental capacity prior to my house being sold. The disclosure by the Royal Courts of Justice does not support barrister Caroline Wilbourn submission to the Bar Standard Board and still they, the Bar Standards Board, turn a blind eye or as Mick says show a willing blindness !
ps Feel free to publish.. here is the link

JAN 24 2015 [616470]hits.

A huge 6.5 million Brits care for a loved one who is older, seriously ill or disabled, saving the economy an estimated £119billion a year. Millions of carers across the nation are at breaking point – overwhelmed by loneliness, exhaustion, depression and massive financial strain. A huge 6.5 million Brits care for a loved one who is older, seriously ill or disabled, saving the economy an estimated £119billion a year in bills to professionals. But shock research reveals 80% feel completely alone, while 50% feel depressed, with no official help in sight. One husband who takes care of his ill wife hit out at “broken promises” from the country’s leaders, as charity Carers UK – behind the study – called for better support from the Government. The charity’s chief executive Helena Herklots said: “Caring touches all our lives yet society and public services have yet to grasp how isolating looking after a loved one can be. "Pressures on finances, a lack of support to allow carers to have a break and a lack of understanding from friends and colleagues, mean many carers feel that their world is shrinking.” More than 60% of those feeling lonely have lost touch with family and friends as their role takes over their lives, while others are uncomfortable talking to friends, leaving them increasingly on the outside, the Alone and Caring study revealed.
How uncomfortably TRUE is this but added to the above discomforts we personally like alot of others are having face corruption fraud theft of assets and worst of all imprisonment for speaking out and trying to get redress for those thefts. Additional torture all created out of the MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005.

JAN 24 2015 [616467]hits.

Print about justice being taken into the hands of the COMMON MAN.
Headed up by friends GUY TAYLOR & ROGER HAYES the corruption has got to end and real justice is about to return to the COMMON MAN..

JAN 23 2015 [616440]hits.
“If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.”

23/01/2015 letter from PRO BONO reviewing BARRISTER with our reply 2.

3. Because of doubts about the integrity of the trustee members of the management committee WE request the reviewing BARRISTERs name!!
Lord Diplock in Att-Gen v. Times Newspapers Ltd. [1974], ante, outlines the various ways which the due administration of justice might be prejudiced: "The due administration of justice requires first that all citizens should have unhindered access to the constitutionally established courts of criminal or civil jurisdiction for the determination of disputes as their legal rights and liabilities; secondly, that they should be able to rely upon obtaining in the courts the arbitrament of a tribunal which is free from bias against any party and whose decision will be based upon those facts only that have been proved in evidence adduced before it in accordance with the procedure adopted in courts of law; and thirdly that, once the dispute has been submitted to a court of law, they should be able to rely upon there being no usurpation by any other person of the function of the court to decide according to law. Conduct which is calculated to prejudice any of these requirements or to undermine public confidence that they will be observed is contempt of court"

JAN 22 2015 [616406]hits.

JAN 21 2015 [616350]hits.
What chance has anyone got if the complaints office is all controlled by the one's you are complaining about. The criminality is all intermingled corruption from the top down. So .. on a play on words they just mess you around by stating they have no remit. Gillian Houston states "I have noted that you have stated allegations of fraud. This is a criminal offence and does not fall under the remit of the JCIO. Should you wish to further your allegations of fraud you may want to contact the Police in the first instance." Surely if she investigated just a tad more she would have discovered I have already contacted the POLICE NOT just once, but 4 times and NOTHING happened! If you read this website you will find the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Peter FAHY openly admit that only half of allegations are actually investigated and this is because it is based on what the chances are of conviction.. so where white collar crime is committed by way of FRAUD with criminal LAWYERS they see little success so in point of fact just DO NOT BOTHER. In other words white collar criminals with LAW degrees are free to carry on committing FRAUD with impunity. I NEED to become a LAWYER as CRIME PAYS as a lawyer backed by CRIMINAL judges and facilitated by the JUDICIAL CONDUCT "INVESTIGATIONS" OFFICE. After sending back by reply to Gillian a copy of this website article the following reply was received... Dear Mike
Thank you for your email. I have passed your email to senior management who you will receive a reply from in 15 working days.

JAN 16 2015 [616200]hits. ANOTHER VICTIM OF COP
Yet another victim of the criminal racketeering of COUNCILS via the court of protection telephones me last night to ask for advise on this vicious body of corruption operating with impunity against innocent people with capacity before somebody decides to act to STOP IT! by RITA TAYLOR.

JAN 15 2015 [616139]hits. PRO BONO EXCHANGE
Copied in of course are both MPs Gordon Marsden and John Hemming plus the Daily Mail to help demonstrate where the current system lacks representation and goes all out to deny you access one way or another to try and protect the state CRIMINALS with LAW degrees from the corrupt embarrassment of UK injustice. Lets see what happens.

Linda Taylor issues this statement ref court hearing yesterday re BODENHAM MANOR eviction. Firstly a Massive Thank you to all of you who travelled from as far as Scotland and Ireland to support us yesterday. Was an amazing day and fantastic to see everyone interacting and having a great time in pub afterwards.
So the CPS have been ordered to produce 'original documents' regarding the eviction at Bodenham - well thats going to be very interesting - we wont hold our breath waiting !! Guy is going to be doing an update on UK Column today around 1pm - hope you all got home safely and we are truly humbled and thankful for having the support of such awesome human beings - much love Linda & Guy xx NEXT TRIAL DATE 9th n 10th Feb 2015

Judges who make life-changing decisions on behalf of people who lack mental capacity will now routinely have to publish their judgments. The Court of Protection has previously been criticised for being secretive. But now its most senior judge, Sir James Munby, has published new guidance for judges which urges transparency. Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court, said: “There is a need for greater transparency in order to improve public understanding of the court process and confidence in the court system. At present too few judgments are made available to the public, which has a legitimate interest in being able to read what is being done by the judges in its name.” He added: “Permission to publish a judgment should always be given whenever the judge concludes that publication would be in the public interest and whether or not a request has been made by a party or the media.”

Justice For Peter Hofschroer Trial
15th December 2014 9am Finally peters been remanded in custody until December 15th at York crown court..
Peter was arrested in York magistrates court on Monday December 1st at about 1310 pm he was man handled like a violent criminal they was foaming at the mouth for Peters arrest I knew something was wrong when I saw 10 people surround his brother going in to court all dressed in suits please help Peter by calling York police and asking how Peter is.
Peters arrest is just because he's looking out for his mum who is allegedly being 'abused' but we all think Peter has stumbled on to something more important and they want to silence him.
We need your help, urgently.
Andy Peacher 01444 390 270
Justice For Peter Hofschroer The Trial 5 May at 10:00 in UTC+01 York Crown Court in York
Once again we see the immense Power of the State being used to silence whistle-blowers.

JAN 10 2015 [616001]hits. Norman Scarth SPEAKS VOLUMES

[615980]10th JAN 2015
Being intouch with other victims of the C.O.P. fraud, theft and tyranny, I hereby have been asked personally by Kathy Danby to publish a statement of "thanks and gratitude to be extended to all those who have spoke out in favour of her" and the most vile indignities she has had to endure at the hands of this 'tyranical judicial mafia' based within the 'family court of protection' that only serves to protect itself from people exposing their blatant breaches of human rights. Kathy Danby whom was kidnapped by foot soldiers of the MAFIA[police] from a Ken Dodd show in Liverpool and thrown into prison for so called contempt of a court order forbidding contact with her grand daughter whom she was seen HUGGING.

[615978]10th JAN 2015

JAN 7 2015 [615936]hits.

The president of the Family Division of the High Court, Sir James Munby, highlights the case of a couple struggling to get legal aid.
A couple who have struggled to get legal aid while fighting to stop their three-year-old son being adopted could be forgiven for thinking that they are "trapped" in a system which is "neither compassionate nor even humane", the most senior family court judge in England and Wales has said. Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the case raised human rights issues relating to people's entitlements to a fair trial and to respect for family life.
Have your say on the serious crime bill

JAN 6 2015 [615894]hits.
was a scream, and helped in a way I could not have imagined... knowing that I may have been forced into a UK refugee status from injustice but that, you can't keep a good man down, no matter where in the world he maybe.. here I lay thanks to the friends I made on the film set of BENIDORM as an extra and the stars I ate lunch with and the pictures taken with them, enjoying it all in a dark time of our battle for justice whilst in exile.

video has been published at

JAN 6 2015 [615886]hits.

Is the gutter press finally waking up to what we have been exposing for decades the rise of tyranny under a judicial mafia? Human rights only freemasons, homosexuals and serial criminals need apply. I was warned about the judicial mafia by my own MP GORDON MARSDEN some two and half years ago in an unbeknown to him recorded meeting that lasted about 45-50 minutes where a heated exchange at times I'd complained about the corrupt judiciary and he warned me back then to be very careful about using such terms about the judiciary. In this meeting you can clearly hear him point this out at 26:40s minutes in & especially 39:30 and to which I pointed out its to late its all published on this site, I speak as I find. MPs I now know have done little to nothing to help us and I now have put all the pieces of the jigsaw together because this is what runs britain...
LINK to MP3 meeting with Gordon Marsden MP dated 16/5/2012

JAN 2 2015 [615674]hits. PRO BONO APPLICATION SENT
Representation that remains elusive to date, as we suspect there does infact exist a law society blacklist to use to ignore/blank any individuals they consider a probable threat to their business, but in order to try and confirm such thoughts lets make one final effort.

JAN 1 2015 [615645]hits. JUSTICE for FAMILIES - what justice??
I particularly commend you on giving your time to cases like that of a grandmother, Kathy Danby, given a prison sentence for hugging her grand daughter. It is however a shame that such injustices are being dished out to people in the first instance, and though we turned to you for some JUSTICE FOR FAMILIES of our own you could not assist unless I apologised to a corrupt JUDGE for something that has resulted from JUDICIAL power being used in a manner of ABUSE of Process to inflict VOID orders from acting ULTRA VIRES, resulting in us fleeing the UK with many others into a status of
Still today in 2015 NOTHING is being DONE! Mike Clarke [55] carer over 18 years of my mother ANN CLARKE [74] living in EXILE! In the meantime the house she has to assist in taking care of her falls into rack and ruin from penetrating damp from our 2 year incarceration in exile.
PRO BONO work would be nice to receive but in reality no one including JFF really wants to take on the CROWN & it's judicial recklessness which will continue unabated as long as JUDICIAL UNACCOUNTABILITY continues and thus sending innocent persons to prisons without requested JURIES that being a clear breach of a persons rights to fair trials.

JAN 1 2015 [615625]hits. COURT FILE REQUESTED 01/10/14
Mike Clarke
did Guy ever get to see my court file Linda... HAPPY NEW YEAR xx
Linda Taylor
Hey Mike xx Guy says they never got back to him - but said to tell you that this has been happening to loads of people who have requested them same - as we know - they either dont exist or can be proved to be fraudulent - he says dont worry - this is good, we are now compiling everyones data regarding this - so we can take action xxx Happy New year xx LINK to actual faxed request
Under court rules - they are supposed to supply court files within 48hrs of request! Anyone think there is FRAUD going on?

JAN 1 2015 [615621]hits. FREE AT LAST from C.O.P. TYRANNY

Grandmother jailed for hugging granddaughter is freed by judge... Outside court, a defiant Mrs Danby said she had been through ‘a humiliating ordeal’, which had seen her ‘bundled’ from a Ken Dodd concert and latterly locked up in prison. Asked if she had been scared in jail however, she laughed, replying: ‘No, I wasn’t scared. I don’t scare easily.’ She described how the day after her arrest she was taken to the Birmingham court for what was apparently to be the sentencing review hearing, but claimed when she got there accompanied by security officers, ‘nobody knew what was going on’. ‘Then a lady came from the court and said ‘Mrs Danby wasn’t supposed to be taken here, she was supposed to be taken to (HMP) Foston Hall (in Derby)’. ‘So, this is then a 200-mile journey, so they took me in a rickety old van, while I was suffering a loss of sleep.’ Once at the all-women prison, she was allocated a cell and then claimed the medication she needs to treat her liver disease was taken off her because it could not be identified. She said it was not until almost 24 hours later, she was allowed back her pills. Summing up her experience, Mrs Danby said she had been ‘strung along’, and prevented from speaking to her son since the night of her arrest in Liverpool on Sunday. ‘It is very difficult because I cannot believe they’ll go to these lengths to pursue a 72-year-old woman who’s got a liver disease, just in order to keep control over my granddaughter, which is what they’re trying to do,’ said the pensioner. ‘I can’t tell you any more about my granddaughter.’
LINK to more info on KATHY

JAN 1 2015 [615620]hits. WHITE COLLAR FRAUD

Family battling to keep farm worth £2million which was 'sold for £150,000 by solicitor who was found dead after telling police he had forged the owner's signature'

JAN 1 2015 [615610]hits. THE QUEENS SPEECH deciphered

by Christopher Everard
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH: Deciphered by British Author, CHRIS EVERARD: The Queen is not just the Queen of Britain, she is the queen of a vast empire called the Commonwealth. Her name is not 'Windsor' - on 18th of July 1917 the Times newspaper carried a royal proclamation introducing the name "Windsor" and dropping "all German titles" held by the royal family at Buckingham Palace. Britain's royal family were known as the Dukes, Kings and Queens of "Saxe-Coburg-Gotha". In a time of brutal war with Germany, a more German family name would be hard to find.
By 1915, with the first world war almost a year old, the horrific sinking of the cruise-ship Lusitania by a German submarine - with the loss of almost 1,200 lives - a fresh wave of anti-German outrage emerged in Britain and in the USA. The consequences for Germans in Britain were grave - and so, being German, the queen's grand-parents and great-grandparents created a fake name which they use to this day; 'WINDSOR'.
Today, our present queen is the queen to peoples on all corners of planet earth - and she earns TAXES from far a field, such as sheep farm workers in Australia and tourism businesses in the many Caribbean islands which the queen owns as part of the 'commonwealth'.
Her close relatives control the thrones of Spain, Netherlands and her brother-in-law's family controlled the intelligence/spy networks of the NAZI Third Reich. She is married to her own cousin, and he owns an enormous private estate in the Holstein-Schleisweg district on the border between northern Germany and Scandinavia. The queen hires and fires the head of the BBC and several other prominent jobs in Britain. Her family's financial affairs are forbidden from public discussion and she can recall and dissolve parliament whenever she likes. Her cousin is DAVID CAMERON, and there are strong Germanic-Jewish ties to our 'British' royal family.
Where does her money come from? It comes in the form of TAXES which are earned from millions of people's wage-packets. The Queen also earns millions each year from her private estate which is centred on the county of Lancaster.
THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER In addition to the total monarchial control of the Inland Revenue, Royal Mint and Crown Estates, the British monarchy have their own personal land estates - these are properties which at no time can be claimed by the British People and are always, under rule of law, considered to be private estates. One such estate is the vast Duchy of Lancaster which consists of 46,200 acres (18,700 hectares) which includes hamlets, villages, towns, historic buildings, and farm land right across England and Wales.
As of fiscal year 2007, the Duchy of Lancaster is valued at £397 million, earning Queen Elizabeth an officially stated net profit of £11.9 million - or, put another way, she has a private income from this Duchy equivalent to nearly £33,000 per day. Income tax is paid voluntarily on all profits from the Duchy of Lancaster.
The duchy is not the property of 'The Crown' (which is a label used to perpetuate the pretence that British People own the property) but is instead the personal property of the monarch and has been since 1399, when the Dukedom of Lancaster, held by Henry of Bolingbroke merged with the crown on his appropriation of the throne (after the dispossession from Richard II). This area of Britain is populated by some of the poorest families in Europe, with disgusting living conditions. Elevators full of piss are a common sight, and vandalism and graffiti is, perhaps, a subconscious reaction to the immense inequality witnessed in this region.
I have written this article so that the next time a politician tells you that there will be 'tough decisions' to be made - which is political double-speak for cutting wages and wheeling in another slab of taxes which fire off yet another recession - you can refer to this article and confidently quote the immense amount of TAX which we all pay each year and how our tax money has created a vast fortune for the Royals...
THE ROYAL TRILLIONS... Taxes on Customs & Excise are collected worldwide and funnelled into Buckingham Palace - it is a matter of fact that revenues flow into the coffers from the USA and especially the 'common wealth' nations. BP shareholdings by the British royals and indeed the Dutch royals (who are closely related) are extensive - to say the least - and the crude oil extracted from the Americas by BP, which is then refined into consumer products, marine diesel and automobile fuels, accrues vast revenues for the royal family members in Europe...
First of all, exactly how much tax do British people pay every year? Taxation in the United Kingdom earned Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs £660 billion pounds last year - that is the sum which is commonly quoted by MPs and newspapers. Much of that tax comes from the People - not Corporations - who are often able to shutdown their parent company after three years, and start trading under a slightly different name, thus avoiding capital gains tax in perpetuity. This, of course, makes a mockery of the unwritten law that the wealthier of people in society contribute tax revenue in order to help the disabled & elderly. Workers, however, on the P.A.Y.E system cannot take legal advantage of tax havens, and have the indignation of a large portion of their salary being taxed/stolen at source, with not a jot of thanks from the Inland Revenue - nor, more importantly, is there any explanation as to why they have been taxed and what exactly the tax will be spent on.
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH: Is usually recorded about four weeks before Christmas. Because the Queen is married to a German family, and her ancestor, Prince Albert of Saxe Coburg spoke German, wrote all letters of state in German and that her own nephew was a spy selling British secrets to the Germans, the Queen uses the Christmas Day broadcast to make us think she is wholly British and a Christian.
Her actual family come from Saxony and Bavaria - more of her ancestors are German than British.
Her Christmas Day speech usually includes references to British religious landmarks, such as this year when her speech stated "In the ruins of the old Coventry Cathedral is a sculpture of a man and a woman reaching out to embrace each other. The sculptor was inspired by the story of a woman who crossed Europe on foot after the war to find her husband. Casts of the same sculpture can be found in Belfast and Berlin, and it is simply called Reconciliation".
Of course, the Queen would be horrified if the British public realised that her own brother-in-law through marriage was a senior NAZI who funded and helped stage-manage the murder, torture, rape, killing and bombing of many hundreds of thousands of British troops and their allies. The queen’s husband has close former Nazi relatives - and this fact was raised by Mohamed Al Fayed during his evidence at the inquest into the killing of his son Dodi and Princess Diana in 1997. Mr Al Fayed believes Prince Philip personally orchestrated their deaths and, while being questioned, demanded that the coroner Mr Justice Scott Baker investigate the “Prince’s Nazi past”.
The sinister Nazi connections come from three of the Duke of Edinburgh’s four sisters – Sophie, Cecile and Margarita. All had married German princes, three of whom became leading Nazis - and that means that they were financing the killing machine which bred a 'master race' .
Prince Philip, whose family name is Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg, attended the funeral in Nazi Germany of his elder sister Cecile as a 16-year-old schoolboy in 1937. He was pictured flanked by other relatives who were dressed in NAZI and Brownshirt uniforms. This, then, is the queen's immediate inter-married family - headed by two princes in particular – Philipp of Hesse and his brother Christoph, who were great-grandsons of Queen Victoria – they had been central architects of a plan which was designed to bomb and crush the national governments of all Europe's nations, and bring the colonies of Portugal, Spain, Belgium, Austria, Hungary, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia and Greece under one centralised super-government which is exactly what we have today - it is called the EUROPEAN UNION - and it is secretly controlled by Buckingham Palace.
The queen's immediate relatives plotted and conducted bombing raids and reduced the areas of all Europe's cities where poor people lived into rubble and wasteland. It was the queen's relatives who waged war on the People - the POOR PEOPLE.
No wonder then, as this information seeps out onto the world wide web, that she announced in her Christmas broadcast "Reconciliation is the peaceful end to conflict, and we were reminded of this in August when countries on both sides of the first world war came together to remember in peace…" Well Ma'am, people are remembering more than just those that died - through our diligence and historical research and our independent broadcast empire, we have managed to re-educate people and fill in the blanks in the dreadful history lessons which we were subjected to at school - the plain truth is that it was the British-Bavarian royal families related directly to Queen Victoria who are responsible for millions of deaths.
The queen then said; "The ceramic poppies at the Tower of London drew millions, and the only possible reaction to seeing them and walking among them was silence. For every poppy a life; and a reminder of the grief of loved ones left behind". In fact, those poppies displayed at the Tower of London were deliberately made to look like blood gushing from a window and pooling around the Tower which is where many royal members of the queen's family had been murdered, or ordered the torture and execution of the innocent.
The queen's speech is definitely an 'olive branch' being offered to authors like myself who have made films that expose the carnage and blood on royal hands. She said; "In 1914, many people thought the war would be over by Christmas, but sadly by then the trenches were dug and the future shape of the war in Europe was set. But, as we know, something remarkable did happen that Christmas, exactly a hundred years ago today.
Without any instruction or command, the shooting stopped and German and British soldiers met in no man’s land. Photographs were taken and gifts exchanged. It was a Christmas truce. Truces are not a new idea. In the ancient world a truce was declared for the duration of the Olympic Games and wars and battles were put on hold…". Well Ma'am, I am sorry to say this, but the only we we can have any kind of truce is by way of equalising British society, handing back lands stolen from commonwealth aboriginal tribal people, and making sure that you STOP TAXING US.
The queen then attempted to ingratiate herself with the millions of brain dead TV addicts who sit through hours of meaningless televised SPORT - she said; "Sport has a wonderful way of bringing together people and nations, as we saw this year in Glasgow when over 70 countries took part in the Commonwealth Games. It is no accident that they are known as the Friendly Games. As well as promoting dialogue between nations, the Commonwealth Games pioneered the inclusion of para-sports within each day’s events. As with the Invictus Games that followed, the courage, determination and talent of the athletes captured our imagination as well as breaking down divisions…" The queen thinks that giving 'circuses' to the nations, just as the Roman Emperors did, that we would all forget about her family's heinous war crimes. We don't and will not.
Her Majesty then attempted to make some kind of apology for the thousands of families who were marred and bereaved through her civil warfare operation in Northern Ireland which lasted from the early 1960s through to the end of the 1990s; She said "The benefits of reconciliation were clear to see when I visited Belfast in June. While my tour of the set of Game Of Thrones may have gained most attention, my visit to the Crumlin Road Gaol will remain vividly in my mind". It was, actually, this prison where agents, double agents and triple agents tortured, beat and were themselves incarcerated as the wicked civil warfare bloomed in Ireland - this war was about TAXATION and the need-for-greed which assimilates all royal family members - it is the wage packets of the Northern Irish people closest to her heart - not their feelings, or remorse for the people killed under orders of the 'loyalists' and the MI5 death squads in Ireland.
She even had the audacity to say; "What was once a prison during the Troubles is now a place of hope and fresh purpose; a reminder of what is possible when people reach out to one another, rather like the couple in the sculpture". Of course, the real reason why there is now a truce in northern Ireland is that bombs were planted in the City of London which hit Buckingham Palace and all their stockbroker yes-men very hard indeed.
Perhaps the biggest insult was a total lack of recognition of the blatant VOTE RIGGING in the Scottish Referendum, which I predicted two months before it would take place, would result in an outcome in favour of Buckingham Palace - on this point, the queen said; "Of course, reconciliation takes different forms. In Scotland after the referendum many felt great disappointment, while others felt great relief; and bridging these differences will take time".
To finish off, the queen then made yet another attempt at making her family look as 'Christian' as possible. This is perhaps the biggest lie - her real name is not 'Windsor' - her real name is Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg und Gotha. Coburg is part of her family's enormous portfolio of properties - the town of Coburg had a large Jewish community until the 1940s. Jews had lived there since the 14th century. The old synagogue was a former church. Coburg became Protestant after the Reformation. All Catholics were persecuted. A new Catholic community was founded in the 19th century. Gotha ['go?ta?] is the fifth-largest city in Thuringia, Germany, and was established by jews, who then entered the aristocracy and became the ancestors of our queen. In 1180, Gotha was first mentioned as a city, when the area between Brühl and Jüdenstraße ["jew street" became the core of urban development, highlighting the early presence of Jews in this old trading town… The queen is, and has always been, a closet jewess, whose family fortunes are rooted in the four Saxon duchies of Saxe-Altenburg, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Saxe-Meiningen, and Saxe-Weimar. The Saxe-Coburg und Gotha Duchy is an independent principality of the old German empire.
Jews are mentioned in connection with Saxe-Meiningen as early as the first half of the fourteenth century. On Good Friday, April 10, 1349, a Christian girl proclaimed in a church that, on passing the synagogue at the northern city gate, she had heard the Jews agreeing to attack and plunder the Christians during the Easter festival - this is one of many allegations called 'blood libels' n which jews are allegedly meant to kill Christian children, drain their blood and use the blood in biscuits enjoyed at jewish festivals.
Because of the little girl's accusations and fears, some [not all] of the Jews were thrown into prison; and at the order of Bishop Albert of Würzburg they and their wives and children were burned at the stake on July 17 following. After the expulsion of the Jews the synagogue remained closed for twenty-two years, when it was transformed into the Chapel of St. Mary Magdalene. A Jew named Gutkind of Hildburghausen had business relations with the counts of Henneberg. In 1348 the Jews were expelled from Sangershausen; and they are not again mentioned there until 1431, when the town was destroyed by fire. A "Judengasse," later called "Jakobstrasse," existed in the town until 1858…
Of course, it is about this time that the Saxe-Coburg Gotha royal clan up-booted from Germany and took over control of the throne of Britain. The name Saxe-Coburg-Gotha came to the British Royal Family in 1840 with the marriage of Queen Victoria to Prince Albert, son of Ernst, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Members of this 'British' royal family had been involved in the BAVARIAN ILLUMINATI which had been stage-managed from behind the scenes by Adam Weishaupt, who on 18th November 1830 (aged 82) died in the queen's family duchy of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.
Of course, the Bavarian Illuminati was a Judaic and 'illuminised' form of freemasonry - it's rituals were based on jewish magic and Chaldean pageantry. Adam Weishaupt was a closet jewish lawyer specialising in the law of the Vatican, and he received regular wages from the queen's ancestor, Duke Ernest II of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg (1745–1804). Weishaupt lived in a house on the Gotha Duchy writing a series of works on illuminism [ie; planning the New World Order], his books include gems such as A Complete History of the Persecutions of the Illuminati in Bavaria (1785), A Picture of Illuminism (1786), An Apology for the Illuminati (1786), and An Improved System of Illuminism (1787).
Considering the devilish antics of Bavarian secret societies and the inter-generational masonic mind-programming which has gone on amongst the royal family, one can see very well that they are far from being 'good christians'.
The likelihood of the queen being christian is doubtful at best, and a farce at worst - her ancestors have been brown-nosing with satanically-inspired diabolical secret societies, and her own great grand-parents designed [or I should say re-designed] Europe using the help of a jewish-catholic lawyer - Weishaupt - who preached that all religions were 'tools' and that Illuminati brethren should conceal their true religious allegiance. Prince Albert's mother was dismissed from the court of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha for having an affair with the Jewish chamberlain, the Baron von Mayern - and in fact queen Victoria's husband, Prince Albert, may have been illegitimate. Albert's father may have been Jewish… And this would explain the very un-Britishness of the facial features we see in today's royal family. Another reason may be due to Albert's father, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg, had hereditary syphilis - but that's another story!

JAN 1st 2015 [615600]hits. HAPPY NEW YEAR for some!

We bring in the NEW YEAR without any celebration, in fact, just shear disgust at the lastest Court of Protection victim, KATHY DANBYs incarceration to prison whilst trying to enjoy her christmas with her family.
We are now seeing that, TYRANTS are running Britain, without any fear or accountability.
WE are all truely in alot of danger in 2015 and people really need to rub their eyes and wake up to what is really happening under their noses.
This year needs to be the year that action via boots on the ground needs to take place to STOP this evil activity from progressing within our country.
Without that we are gradually sliding into a state of ANARCHY.
It is a shocking state of affairs that I find myself speaking on this level as I like many others was once proud of our nation but I fear I no longer hold those views.
This year I find myself not celebrating but saying prayers for those who will lose their lives or their freedom trying to gain justice in the country once proud of its judicial fairness under common law that now appears to have been tossed into the bin, hijacked by tyranical pirates of LAW, blacklisting those seeking such justice, blocking any reasonable due course of remedy in what appears to be a masonic conspiracy of coverup protecting criminals in high office.

Back to top

THE NUTS/BOLTS OF OUR EVIDENCE SENIOR MASTER JUDGE DENZIL ANTON LUSH (born 18/7/1951 Southsea, Hants) - in holding the ultimate fudiciary responsibilty to demonstrate there being no fraud or breach of contract of the 1st general order where he stated; “The reasonable fees and expenses of a professional receiver are recoverable from the defendant in the personal injury action as a head of damage. They do not simply fall on the patient’s fund.” & for ignoring the doctors reports stating my mother had capacity from the beginning and then sending his own corrupt doctor whom did not conduct a clinical examination. Also for his collusion with the perpetrator of further crimes, his appointed deputy...
DEPUTY RECEIVER & CROOK HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES ( born on 24/06/1955 ) and his failure to account as to what had happened to £1.1 million pounds inclusive of his breach of contract in the 1st general order stating; “the family should rest assured that my costs will not be eroding the capital settlement agreed for their mothers care and other specific needs.” & his 'fraud by false representation' when the patient emigrated outside the jurisdiction of England & Wales losing £100,000 of the client funds in exchange rate losses in a 'neglect of duty'. meeting 07.02.2011 - meeting 18.07.2011 - others to follow
MARTIN JOHN - the then chief executive of the Office of the Public Guardian and his failure to provide a proper detailed investigation showing good reasons to show there was no theft fraud mal administration.
CHIEF CONSTABLE PETER FAHY for his failure to investigate a reported white collar crime of Theft Fraud and Mal administration and also provide a crime reference number on the 4 occasions it has been asked for. Further today 30/11/2013 Six out of 10 crimes are not investigated, admits Sir Peter Fahy READ.
JUDGE PETER ARTHUR BRIAN JACKSON (born 9 December 1955), for his failure to take account of the LIVING WILL that he authorised mums capacity to make & then after reading it where he later then, ring fenced her property giving an order that it could not be sold in her lifetime, so that she could not do with it as she pleased with her living will executor wilfully breaching 'part 24' of the WILLS act 1837 & also right to a private life Article 8 of ECHR.
JUDGE ADMINISTRATOR Philip Mark Pelling QC and so called "Nominated COURT OF PROTECTION Judge" whom conducted a TREASONOUS, BIASED, UNFAIR administrative statute tribunal, WITHOUT IMPARTIALITY & without the consent of all parties where he abandoned the court to have our representation thrown out by security after they claimed common law jurisdiction and requested a JURY after which he returned to hand down a 3 month prison sentence to the protected party/CARER of 17 years flying in the face of statute Mental Capacity ACt 2005 section 5 and thus the protection of carers from any civil liability in the connection of the care of a so called patient of the court of protection whom
Watch a video statement by my representation to radio station of 7mins
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?

READ our submission to the House of Lords select committee meeting on Mental Capacity Act, Committee. Where this submission along with lots of others containing vital evidence have been returned, deleted or just unread because Chairman LORD HARDIE said, 'they contain NAMES'!!! So er, hang on if you go to the POLICE as we have and do not give a name how can they investigate... not that the POLICE do anyway as they too will not even give reference numbers/log numbers!! The term to remove let's say sensitive information is called REDACTION would it not have been the most polite thing to do is remove the names but keep the evidence that the most vulnerable, 'hands on' people, suffering at the hands of the Mental Capacity Act could be heard!! What we have here LORD HARDIE is another whitewash dismissing the most vulnerable people in another act of FRAUD!
Read the 1st general order of the 20.03.2001 pdf in particular the highlighted paragraphs.
READ the Sibling's lack of CREDABILITY statements 19.1.2012.
In 1998 READ the Total Original Claim of £1.7 million and in it you will see the schedule for receiver costs based on the full claim & a lifespan of 83(not 70 as stated by deputy HUGH JONES). You will see also the setup costs schedule of £4000(not £26,377 as was charged by HUGH JONES).
The reduced compromised settlement was £775,000. You can see where an appeal on the grounds of capacity was unsuccesfully made with 2off 4 hour clinical specialists stating my mother had capacity READ here & this Dr's back up telephone converstaion to Listen to, stating my mother should not be under that court.
You can Listen here to the 40 minute!! unclinical exam from the state's court, a Doctor Khan, that was the pinacle deciding factor for DENZIL LUSH(Matser of the court) to keep mum under the court.
10 years later & we commissioned 2 more doctors of 4 hour exams claiming my mother still has capacity READ the 2010 & READ the 2011.
So on and so forth... if you take the time to read the diary here from the bottom to the top it will demonstrate the shear corruption and evil forces at work upon the vulnerable. Further, that the whistleblower, whom just so happens to be the long standing carer of 17 years and eldest son, is in for stitch up & persecution from the judiciary that will lead to a corrupt prison sentence, where the establishment closes ranks to protect itself using a bent judicial system to meter out what they would term as purged rehabilitation.
BIAS is unlawful in a court of law but here it exudes itself, brimming to overfull, and with impunity, where an 'admiralty administrative statute hearing' calling itself the 'court of protection' gives clear focus in the lack of FAIRNESS and IMPARTIALITY boasting it's BIAS without any fear.
My mother's vacant property, slowly degrading, stands now as a monument to the hypocrisy of UK INJustice, once renowned internationally, that's degenerated into a mafia run racket, committing financial rape on vulnerable people, where the rule of COMMON LAW has been tossed onto the scrap heap infavour of their own BIASED legalese of statutes conducting itself without IMPARTIALITY and FAIRNESS no doubt leading to an uprising of social unrest that the evidence is already here to see by the pockets of growing organisations of rebellion.
There are several criminals in this saga but our case would lay the main injustice allegations with 4 co conspiritors, that being
No1 SENIOR JUDGE DENZIL LUSH(master of the court of protection & the person with ultimate fudiciary responsibilty)
No2 Solicitor HUGH ADRIAN SCOTT JONES(Deputy receiver whom clear evidence here points to him being the crook in the frame) &
No3 PHILIP MARK PELLING QC(Stitch up facilitator) and co ordinator as a NOMINATED Court of Protection Judge to remove any whistleblowers to prison by any crooked method using BIASED means, lacking impartiality and fairness with hearsay allowed, without prosecution witnesses in a tribunal lacking CONSENT & a requested Jury where your own representation has no right of audience and is thrown out.
No4 HONOURABLE JUSTICE PETER JACKSON who we have just added(25.09.2013) due to his inability to recognise the injustice and act HONOURABLY in fact quite the contrary JACKSON ignored the LIVING WILL that he authorised my mother's capacity to make and then he RING FENCED the property in a FRAUD cover up facilitated by LAND REGISTRY.
Mr Jackson has stated openly that “Start Quote [The law is] completely inaccessible to those for whose benefit the legislation has been devised” End Quote… but yet he also is stated on wikipiedia as a person who is a "master tactician (link)[who] stalks his prey in a very subtle, understated manner... He plays to win and does so more often than not," where here these TYRANTS ("one who rules without law, looks to his own advantage rather than that of his subjects, and uses extreme and cruel tactics—against his own people as well as others") are stalking me, & my mothers house/home READ.
ALL four TYRANTS are paid from the racketeering products of the FRAUDULENT Court of Protection/NEGLECTION/CORRUPTION.

Email me-
READ Prison hearing transcript
READ WHAT really happened
Read what was served upon the Judge that in the transcript he admits to reading
1 READ statutory declaration of conditional acceptance of proceedings.
2 READ HIGH COURT NOTICE(7 pages) served by defense team.
3 READ skeleton case from the man.
4 READ contract tendered by statutory declaration.
watch the video statement by my representation to a radio station.
NOTE:There has been no published judgement I wonder WHY?


Back to top


Visitor No: hit counters hits
CONTACTS 25/09/2015
emails to
THAILAND MOB:+66617238348
SKYPE: mrmikeclarke
We are now asking for
donations to our cause

Mp3 recorded meeting of 1HOUR 18.07.11 that clearly shows the start of the process to steal my mothers home
06.10.11 OPG Rep: Meeting Recorded - LISTEN to it.(2HRS)

This is the website of an OPG patient
Happier times 2008 brieflyand her son - carer.

A few words about us, our website and its slogan
"He who cares, wins!"

In June 1995 my mother Ann was 55 - After a long period of depression tried to end her life but tragically it ended her as we knew her & she only awoke from her coma 11 months later to find her new existance as a disabled woman needing 24hr care. Mike was from a Entreprenaur backround of Nightclubs Pubs, Tourism and Hotel life suddenly found himself to be that very carer at the age of 37.

After the obvious glaring failures committed by the ROYAL OLDHAM HOSPITAL a lawsuit case against them was launched in 1995 and some 6 years later in 2001 a compromised out of court settlement of damages was awarded in excess of £775,000. Mum, after 11months in hospital was discharged to a nursing home but the pain to the family of seeing her in there of only a few weeks brought about the decision to care for her at our own homes initially shared for a short period by my sister and I. In 1997 I took on the roll of full time carer and have done so to date, a period of 16 years.

The Website History -

us trying to enjoy life nowThis site has been launched because we emigrated permanent(March 2008) but find that mums estate is still trapped in the UK and as such our security back up when things are not right, of referring to our MP will be removed and thus our spanish option leaves us with a language barrior problem.
Therefore we decided to place the correspondence in the public domain to be judged by all. These link files to the left in column 1 are being documented in reverse order from whatever is todays date, in other words the latest current documents are on the top of the list and because the launch date of this site was only the 3rd April 2010 more and more information will be added over time as its our intention to expose the fundamental misgivings of the original intentions of the COURT OF PROTECTION / NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION!
Anyone can see clearly if pouring over these documents an understanding of the where the name change came from with reference to NEGLECTION / CORRUPTION. We hope this website can also help others whom have serious problems with the OPG and its affiliated deputy's. Its my personal experience in many cases that money is horded away from the patient only to serve as inheritance to relatives whom played little or no role in the care of the affected patient ensuring the best possible existance to the end of their days. My own mother's award was predicted to have only lasted 10 years and her award was based on that prediction and its a testament to good care that her life expectancy is exceeding this prediction by far but that it would not do if constricted by the narrow brush approach of deputies hording vast sums of money away only to protect their long term fees and charges which are vastly in excess usually of what was supposed to have been laid down guidelines from the OPG.

We spent 6 years fighting a court case to get the award and then only to spend then next 10 years fighting the receiver to get it off him. Our lives are permanently blighted by the ongoing struggle in which the original award was supposed to solve. We cannot understand how, in 2010, a little known about corrupt UK government body can continue doing what they do in an unaccountable secret fashion, with lack of transparency and openness that the Cameron/Clegg government is currently promoting.

Though there is today (110410) still alot to resolve we do have a level of life to enjoy where we now live, in the Costa Del Sol, never to return again to the corrupt country from where we were born, THE UK unless of course its by the intimidatory way they are handling our finances and effectively continually trying to blackmail us into returning to the UK.


A testament to good care mum is still going strong at 70 years of age recently on the 9th August 2010 taken during a birthday meal in Benalmedina, Spain.


Born in Middleton, Manchester in 1940 the eldest one of seven mum fast grew up having to learn the rigors of life & at the age 16 she found love married and moved in with her new husband a journey the would last 36 years.

Mum never knew her real father he was missing at war presumed dead, when at the end of the war he returned only to find my mums mum, Grandma pregnant with another mans child whom then decided to leave. Mums real father also left and never returned, he went on to become a Director on the board of British Aerospace a person whom never came to see, find or even acknowledge his own 2 daughters.

With three children and now alone my mums mum, Grandma eventually found another love whom fathered a further four more children with her. My mother being the eldest of seven was very soon helping at an early tender age to look after and bring up her siblings virtually as an additional mother to them

After marriage at 16 mum at 19 gave birth to me, 3 years later my sister and one year later my brother. 3ofusOur family was VERY close. My sister and I bonded more and more over time. I remember all going out at night to our local for evenings all as one close family for many happy times. When I reached 16 I knew I was Gay I confided in my sister, mother and father but chose to pacify them all by saying I was bisexual and dating girls until the age of 26. For ten whole years I struggled to accept that I was never really bisexual at all and the pain that brought resulted in relentless up and down depressive symptoms, which on reflection were burdened on to my mother. She carried them times for me very much where suicide was a frequent consideration and she helped me thro to better times. This was a debt to my mother for which it became easier to repay when she needed me after her life changing accident in 1995.

At the age of 26 I suddenly became concious of the fact that I am what I am and that was the end of my relationships with women that tormented me from being the person I really was. From this point on depression for me became a thing of the past and I personally believe it was my mother whom helped carry me thro that ten year period in my life.

Our upbringing was of a working class family background on predominantly a council estate but that my father thro his business ideas directed several businesses giving me a true insight to that side of life. We were if you like, "bigger fish" in a small pond, respected by the neighbours and life was relatively good though there were lean times especially when my father went bankrupt, a period in his life I swore I'd never go thro.

In 1994 whilst I was directing my own four independant small businesses it became very apparent that my parents marriage was suffering and it was evident on their faces, eventually leading to divorce papers and seperation. It was at this point that mum started a period of depression that would lead up to her near fatal suicide attempt on 23rd June 1995 whilst in my presence in front of my house. I was 36. I only started to enjoy my life from the age of 26, 10 years I held dear, a very good and happy 10 years, but it was over!

Mum had deliberately ran under a 32 ton truck with an extra trailor attached at the rear, I really don't know how but she went under the middle section and only one of it's 18 wheels caught her left foot and caused some damage but unfortunately her skull was fractured. She then had continuous brain swelling over 24 hrs. Her coma lasted months and months, her prognosis was very poor and she was expected to die but her fighting spirit and prayers kept her alive.

I on the other hand lost all fighting spirit, I tryed to continue with my businesses for months but eventually it got to me with flashbacks and depression. Caring for mother slowly over time became the top priority not by choice but by nesseccity. Lives had changed for ever at a stroke June 1995.

I went on to spend an inordinate amount of time energy and fighting spirit to help mum to learn how to talk again and walk again against all odds given by doctors whom had given up. You can clearly see the results 15 years on by the pictures above of mum now 70. All this though has ruined my own life and existence as an entreprenaur and has robbed me of my dignity where personal wealth is concerned. If mum suddenly died I will be left homeless and destitute with nothing but yet I will of created lots of fat cat lawyers fees over the years with an inheritance bonus for waiting relatives. Is this right? I don't think so! Thus I now am hated and dispised by relatives and the courts because I am here fighting my corner for what I believe to be right, some justice for RELATIVE CARERS IN PRIVATE DAMAGES AWARDS.

Some peace at THE MOMENT in our new home, September 2010 but how long for? Back to top

Our VillaWhere would you rather live, be honest! Should mum be put in a old folks home, should she be in her rainy home town of Oldham, forced to live in her daughters back bedroom or do you just believe she's in the right place? This is what I am fighting to maintain for mum, what she truely deserves. Its her money to spend on how she wants to live, its not there for others to run up solicitors bills squabbling and it certainly ain't there for inheritance! How long our life will exist we do not know as the background currently is a concotion of corrupt statements trying to discredit my care for mum on a welfare and financial basis in order to deprive mum of her liberty living and cared for by me, her son abroad where she has capacity to choose where and with whom she wants to live with.

Golfing spectator ANN Taken today at the golf course 161210 mum wanted a taste of what the golfing fuss is all about would she get this sort of treatment in a home - I doubt it extremely.

JUST A NOTE FOR THE WEEK 09.06.2011 The money I now receive personally each week that is classed as expenses and as such mums deputy will not pay it as a wage because he said it would cost more for mum as she would pay tax on it. Well interesting that isn't it. Whilst normal folk whom do a job get a wage slip I don't and when I go to open a bank account they say well Mr Clarke where is your income and when I point to it they say thats not proper income Mr Clarke. Likewise how can one proceed proper with one's life for example how does one get a mortgage so as to have your own property over your head. If my mother lacks the capacity to recognise these things then why is it that she wants to display her concern by trying to gift her pproperty by way of JOINT BENEFICIAL TENANTS IN EQUITY & why can't the British government along with its corrupt establishment see it all, or can they?. Its very obvious really whom the theives are in all this mess but who'd of thought that in 2011 in Britain, this would be going on, but it is!

The court of protection say well if your abroad you can apply to take charge of your mother affairs in that country and when you have done it apply to the UK courts to have the assets and cash released to you but they fail to recognise that in reality my mother has nothing to prove in another country why should she demonstrate to the UK government her capacity or lack of when they hold no jurisdiction in the country of her residence. They are in reality extending their jurisdiction without it being legal in any way. In the meantime their corrupt deputies do there dirty work whilst your outside of the UK. My god, so corrupt its unreal. I spoke to lawyers here in Spain they advised that the cost of an application would possibly exceed £3000 and only have a 50/50 chance of success. So where does one start? Not very nice to think that your own country is effectively screwing you over and taking advantage of the elderly whom clearly have the capacity to manage their own finances.

mums idea of a HOME!Taken today 9.06.11 this is what mum sees to be the type of "home" she wants to reside in till she dies. This is our current rented property in Spain that we have been negotiating to swap with mums UK property but as soon as mums deputy got wind of it he tried to sell her UK property for figures approaching £100,000 less than its value and this is the type of thing your up against!

F.A.C.T Families Against Court of Protection Theft is an organisation of those who have had problems dealing with the Court of Protection (CoP) and Office of Public Guardian (OPG) and are based in the UK. There has been 15,735 recorded complaints of abuse, fraud and corruption from Dec 2001- Dec 2010 (9 years) of the CoP and OPG in the UK.

There are over 50,000 people plus their families affected by these abuses of the Court of Protection, Office of Public Guardian and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) jurisdiction which is also part of the Court of Protection and many young adults who may have autism or aspergers have been wrongfully put under this jurisdiction depriving them from their liberties. Some people would most definitely dispute that these disorders should not even come under Mental Health and whether these young adults are even a threat to anyone.

The Court of Protection and the Office of Public Guardian are a Government run Court based in Archway Tower, Archway, London. It deals with property, financial affairs and personal welfare of people who lack mental capacity or who are unable to make decisions for themselves. Those deemed to lack capacity are many Elderly people who may suffer from Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Disabled People, Road Accident victims awarded compensation and even young adults who maybe Autistic or suffer from Asperger's Syndrome.

The Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian are responsible for determining disputes as to the registration of Enduring Powers of Attorney, and Lasting Powers of Attorney, appointing new trustees, authorising certain gifts and making statutory wills.

However we are very concerned with the way it is run and from recent press such as

1.Daily Mail talks about abuses within the CoP and

2.Guardian 2005 talks about mishandling finances and 97 people having to be compensated for "bad investments and lost cash", they mean FRAUD, it shows how the CoP has been open to corruption, fraud> and abuse in legal terms understood as embezzlement.

As well as police corruption shown by Hoddesdon/Hertford police force as they protect the corrupt, accept bribes and even come to court and lie on Oath. Not to also mention corruption by all those we have reported to and are doing absolutely nothing. This includes SRA, Legal Ombudsman, Parliamentary Ombudsman, all our MPs, House of Lords and all our police forces. It is beyond a national DISGRACE!

Further articles to show Court of Protection and Office of Public Guardian Corruption:

3.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse (NASGA)

4.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse Blog

5.Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud

6.Another Canadian Public Guardian worker imprisoned for Fraud for embezzling $1.2 million in 12 years

7.UK Court of Protection Forum for Victims claiming CoP abuse and fraud

8.UK Court of Protection being investigated

9.UK Court of Protection involved in Mass Fraud

10.Estate of Denial website claim UK CoP involved in Mass Fraud

11.UK Mass Fraud Anajinn Blog Concerns

12.UK Elderly man embezzled £549,000 by Deputy Solicitors Firm, Judkins Solicitors and Judge Henderson cover up fraud

13.Why would Judge Launcelot Henderson also known as Henderson J cover up the fraud? Because he is part of the Court of Protection

14.UK Mark Neary 20 year old autistic son abuse under Deprivation of
Liberty Order of the Court of Protection

15.Anna Raccoon concerns over Steven Neary case

16.UK Families Against Court of Protection Blog

17.UK Families Against Court of Protection on Facebook

18.National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse also on Facebook

19.Ellee Seymour talks about UK Government plans for a Review

20.UK Mark Reeves Case-Road Accident Victim awarded £2.5 million compensation goes to Court fees! They mean SFA (Solicitors Fraud Association)

21.Daily Mail Low IQ woman case

22.Anna Raccoon previous CoP Employee concerns

23.More Anna Raccoon

24.UK Carer for his mother concerns-moved to Spain to escape corruption

25.BBC File on 4

26.BBC File on 4 Documentary

27.Demanding new Prime Minister to Investigate on Your Freedom Forum

28.Telegraph reports

29.The Independent reports

30.Telegraph reports on Autistic Pianist

31.BBC Tips for Power of Attorneys/Lasting Power of Attorneys to avoid the Court of Protection although CoP can overrule these. We did say they are CORRUPT!

32.UK Human Rights Blog Concerns

33.Ellee Seymour Concerns

34.UK Indigo Jo Blogs

35.Advocates for National Guardian Reform (ANGR) Victims and their Stories

36.CBS News catch onto Mass Fraud in Public Guardian America

37.The National Organization to End Guardianship Abuse (NOTEGA)

38.Another Public Guardian worker in America imprisoned for Fraud. When will the UK Government start arresting those involved in the UK Mass CoP Fraud?

39.FACT are very aware of Will and Property Deed Forgery! NHS Yvette Adams Abuse

40.NHS Fraud Louise Tomkins Case

41.NHS Fraud Angolia Dephew Case

42.Directors of Will making firm imprisoned for Fraud-Nicholas Butcher and David Nash Case

43.Corrupt UK Government only change legislation if they receive payment!

44.Lee Gilliland case concern reported by the Telegraph

45.This is Bristol also talks about Lee Gilliland case

46.David Cameron and Parliaments concerns over Privacy Laws ie secretive Court of Protection

47.Daily Mail talks about relationship of gagging orders, injunctions being abused in the Courts especially by the Court of Protection

48.John Hemming MP Court of Protection must be reformed reported by The Telegraph

49.Three Cheers for John Hemming MP by Alex Massie

50.Journalists have Gagging orders banning them reporting/investigating Court of Protection victims cases otherwise will be imprisoned for Contempt of Court

51.Neil Barker's Case

52.Ellee Seymour mentions protest on Fri 29th April 2011

Flaws in the Court of Protection (CoP) were highlighted in a negative press campaign last autumn 2010. The CoP and the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) shared more than 4,000 complaints about its operations over the last two years. It is still being accused of mismanaging £2.7 billion it controls and which is held on behalf of those who no longer have capacity (Ps). Critics claim that it holds the money in a Bank of England account paying 0.5% a year rather than at High Street banks which would provide rates of three per cent. As inflation takes hold it leaves families with an income deficit needing to dig into the capital set aside for a lifetime of care.

The newspapers' campaign An eye catching headline in the Mail on Sunday described the CoP as "The Secret Court of Living Hell". Case histories investigated in the newspaper's campaign included: •An application to the CoP for money to pay fees for residential care taking too long to be processed. P's house sale proceeds were paid into an account held by the court. The money took five months to come through and was £10,000 short of the £35,000 which was required. The aggrieved relative said he was never able to speak to the same person twice about the matter. •P was awarded £1.6 million. When her father died an application was made by her mother to take over from him as the person authorised to run P's financial affairs. The fees came to around £42,000 for solicitors, barristers and accountants. •P's house sale proceeds were transferred into the wrong account. The mistake was only discovered when there was a request to pay P's care home fees. •An administration charge of £4,100 to access £5,800 out of the £90,000 held by the CoP. P, a former solicitor suffering from bi polar disorder, complained requests for money which were supposed to take six weeks were taking five months and that the payments received were less than asked for. •The father of an eight year old boy who had been awarded £4.2 million as a result of medical negligence was accused of being abusive to an official from the CoP on a home visit although nobody had visited him at their home.

There were complaints in particular about delays, expense, the long and obscure court forms, inefficiency and that the court was a remote entity serving itself. These were accelerated by the press attaching links to the articles censuring the Court. In The Mail alone 450 further accusations of incompetence followed on from one article. Internet forums posted comments that it sent bullying letters and treated relations like criminals. Saga magazine quoted children's author Helen Bateman whose husband was in a coma after an accident: "It is an alien, intrusive, time consuming and costly institution which was completely out of tune with what we were going through".

Court of Protection Rules Committee's Review In November the then Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, responded to the concerted attacks by the press. A General Election was on the horizon and the Court was being described as an unresponsive Labour monolith working in secret and grinding its users down. Mr Straw asked Sir Mark Potter, the then President of the Family Division, to appoint a Rules Committee to investigate and recommend changes. The committee was chaired by Mr Justice Charles and Mrs Justice Proudman.

The committee met four times in the spring of 2010 and published a report in July 2010. There was recognition of the need for new court forms to be available as quickly as possible. They were to be custom made for the different types of application to avoid containing the lengthy screeds of unnecessary information the original universal forms require. Better explanatory notes are recommended to be attached to the forms as the current ones have led to confusion. Clearer forms would lower the 80% refusal rate for applications received between January 2008 and December 2009 to deal with property and welfare decisions on behalf of the mentally vulnerable. Forty per cent of applications are made by people without professional support. This is a failure in communication and assists those who fear the Court is composed of civil servants and lawyers busy talking to themselves while failing to provide a simple application process. Fortunately the new forms will be road tested in pilot schemes. Their success will depend on using simple English aimed at non-professionals.

A further recommendation is that court officers, rather than judges, should deal with applications concerning non-contentious property and affairs. Previously nominated officers were trained to deal with routine applications and there was lobbying for their return. There is provision for judges to review those decisions and it will make running the Court easier. Other recommendations of the Rules Committee address speeding up and simplifying procedure in response to the complaints of delay.

A key recommendation is that there should be no change in the rules concerning access to proceedings by the public. When and whether the Court should sit in public or permit its proceedings to be made public will be decided in each case by the judge. In March 2010 the Court of Appeal had already handed down a judgement on the application by the press to be permitted access to a hearing concerning Derek Paravicini, described as a human iPod. He is an autistic, high earning pianist living in sheltered accommodation, needing 24 hour care and unable to manage his finances. The press had been agitating against the Court's closed hearings in a high profile campaign. It was held that article 10 of the European Court of Human Rights covered access to information at a court hearing and there could be no blanket exclusions. The Court of Appeal held that decisions on press access should be within the discretion of the judge hearing the case. The Rules Committee followed the case law but decided against blanket open access.

Scrutiny by the public In May 2010 an open judgment was handed down by Sir Nicholas Wall in DH NHS Foundation Trust v PS [2010] EWHC 1217 concerning a woman aged 55 who had learning difficulties and an overwhelming fear of hospitals and medical treatment. She was deemed not to have mental capacity and unable to make a decision about her treatment. The President ruled that she could be given a drug in a glass of Ribena at her home and detained afterwards on a ward for treatment of cancer of the uterus. Fair reporting in this case though did include Mencap's support for the court's life sustaining decision This re-opened the continuing debate in the press about the court having sweeping powers handed to it by the Labour government that were not open to scrutiny and openness. Previously decisions about life and death , sterilisations and abortions were made in public and could be reported by the media. Profound questions as to when the State can intervene in private life were aired. Fears were voiced that paternalistic doctors would combine with judges to make vital decisions behind closed doors, thus eroding the rights of the individual. The media continue to oppose blocked access on the basis that it more appropriate for countries whose leaders do not like their authority to be questioned.

Another press campaign led to the naming of a local authority which had treated a vulnerable person and their relations in a high handed manner without authority. The latest judgement released to the press concerned "birth control by force". Mr Jusice Bodey in August 2010 criticised a Midlands council who wanted a married woman aged 29 with an IQ of 53 to be sedated, taken from her home and have birth control imposed on her against her will. The plan to prevent her having children he held had shades of social engineering. There would need to be police involvement and contraception under restraint which he could not authorise under the circumstances The Court does not have to handle these types of cases often. Public decision making should be encouraged. Ethical life changing decisions ought to reflect current social, rather than legal, values. Keeping people informed reassures them that judges are in tune with the current moral climate and not remote elderly beings living in a world of their own.

Court of Protection's First Report In June 2010 the Court published its first report, covering its performance between October 2007 and January 2010. The target for an oral hearing within 6 weeks was met in 53% of applications compared with the target of 75%. The Senior Judge explains the shortfall in performance by insufficient Judges. He hoped the appointment of three full time judges in 2010 would help meet targets. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 which created the new Court of Protection did not provide for deputies (part time judges). Full time judges had to be brought in from the regions to cover the London work. The five regional centres were designed to take the hearing centres to the client .This had an impact of the regions that deal with 60% of the work. A more flexible system would be to amend the statute to provide for deputies. They could be drafted in to help with the work flow and be a pool of experienced potential permanent judges.

Applications were analysed. There were 40,000 applications concerning property and affairs and 95% of them did not require court attendance. Forms to apply for a power of attorney had been reduced from 25 pages to 12. There were 2,800 personal and welfare applications with a refusal rate of 80%. There were 13 Deprivation of liberty applications over an eight month period. The general rate of applications was averaging at 1600 per month.

Complaints were addressed. There were 1,672 complaints made about the Court (excluding ones about the OPG taking combined complaints to 4000). These divided into 25% about judicial decisions, 15% about the cost of proceedings, 15% about administrative errors, and 30% about the length of the process and delays. The rate of complaints reduced in the last 6 months and the Senior Judge credits the Court being integrated into HMCS in April 2009 as having had a positive effect.

Performance indicators were divided into three periods of time. There was an improvement in the proportion of applicants contacted within 20 days of receipt of the application (92%), and of those applications meeting the target for paper directions within 16 weeks (77%) but for those within 20 weeks underperforming by 14%. 59% of applications were heard within 6 weeks, a poor performance the Senior Judge hopes will be improved upon. Replies to correspondence within 10 working days were off target by 20% and down to 75%.

Continuing criticisms The report did not stem criticism. BBC's File on Four, broadcast on 27th of July, focused on new complaints. Parents of disabled children who became 18 had to apply at great expense to be deputies to manage their children's meagre finances and thought their particular situation had been overlooked. A compensation award invested at 0.5% interest instead of 4.5%, the Halifax rate of interest at the time, was bitterly attacked by an accident victim who estimated he had lost £50,000. Another accident victim was awarded £1.5 million and wanted to know the number of hours charged for by her deputy and after 3 months had not been told. The charity Elder Abuse was receiving constant calls to its helpline about fees for unnecessary work and the Court approving too many bills in excess of the £1100 capped rate. Delay in preventing financial abuse was highlighted. The niece of a hospital patient with dementia had taken £300,000 out of P's accounts and conveyed P's home into joint names. It took 3 months to cut off the niece's access to the accounts and no sanctions were taken against her. The Court was attacked for being slow and lenient. The programme concluded that lobbyists like the Court and the public do not.

It is worth remembering the previous Court was also vilified. A Parliamentary Ombudsman Report in 2005 noted poor staff training, high staff turnover, and serious mistakes in managing clients' money. There were poor investments and lost cash leading to compensation claims. Staff often never replied to letters and took months to sort anything out. When complaints mounted up internal memos were written which were "staggering in their arrogance". Overall the Court is trying to improve. It does have a challenging client base and a large volume of work. Some of the delays maybe due to lawyers not using its emergency provisions (see Urgent Applications in the Court of Protection, Pierce and Jackson (Jordans)). It is admitting shortcomings and attempting to adapt quickly. There are now 2,000 applications per month. Previously the four judges based at Archway could not keep up with the volume of work. Although three new judges were appointed in Spring 2010 none of them had sat as judges before their appointment. Meanwhile two experienced Judges will be leaving by spring 2011. It is likely the Senior Judges optimism for future efficiency is misplaced and there will be more delay.

The media have a grievance about removing its right of access, at time when the culture is towards more open justice and will continue with criticism campaigning to get into the hearings. The pressure group Families Against Court of Protection Theft set up by relations who were unhappy with the CoP is also a vocal critic but has a limited ability to solve the problems of others. Website content such as the OPG's pledge to acknowledge a complaint within two working days, unless it does so, will fuel the flames.

It is hoped the new forms, produced with the benefit of the HMCS's drafting experience, will be an improvement on the OPG's previous efforts and will be comprehensible and user friendly. It has been a very bumpy start. The basement interest rates need to be addressed. The tenor of past complaints has been of faceless bureaucrats making incomprehensible decisions, then failing to communicate about them. Focus should be on running an efficient, responsive, problem solving service for the most vulnerable. For many, the Court is still not serving the most vulnerable but adding to their problems.

Back to top

Mother/patient - Ann Clarke The Patient

Having emigrated to Spain in March 2008 I just want to feel free, normal & happy. Not overshadowed by the british government. Human again & not repressed. My son would like his dignity restored not to be discriminated against as a relative carer but to be treated with equality and be paid fair like others. My money should not be in pounds but in euros and because of this its value since moving to Spain has devalued by 80,000 Euro. I should not be forced to live off an exchange rate by the British Government. My liberty and freedom of choice should be respected.

I suffer from dysphasia

People with dysphasia may have difficulty talking, understanding "not me", listening "not me", writing "not me" or doing numeral calculations "not me". They may be mildly or severely affected "not me". Everyday tasks, such as shopping or answering the phone "not me", may be impossible.
People with the condition can

"think clearly and know what they're feeling, and their intellect is maintained."

They're often mistakenly thought to be drunk or mentally confused "not me". Read 2010 The CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ASSESSMENT report on me thats just been delivered and its the second report in 10 years that confirms my capacity. So why am I being treated like a dog by the British Government?
A 4 page report by
Dr Hana Al-Hamar 22.05.2001 that was the result of a 4hour examination.
Listen to Dr Hana's comments June 2001.
Dr Khan from the Lord Chancellors Office, 1 hour recording that is unbelievable as to why they keep mum in the Court of Protection 05.09.2001
The latest report in November 2011 Read 31 pages

& Mike
The Son Carer & Author-51

Carer Son - Mike Clarke Read CV

Michael's RANT!

The carer's work is never done and neither is it paid for!. Discriminated against as a relative carer there is no equality! It's also a 24hr attention span thats needed. I think sometimes, "I'd like to go to the beach for a day but there is'nt enough free time!" We think we'd like a weekend alone visit Morroco or Gibralter but again the tie is there and you can't. When family visit they think they're on holiday so not only are you still waiting on the patient you are also waiting on the family. I sometimes wish they'd say "hey Mike!" we're here you get off for the weekend and enjoy yourselves but "no!".

Treated like hired help but without pay, by your own family is sometimes how it feels. You also feel you have no home, no place of your own and people say well it was your choice but really it were'nt. My mother asked for my care and attention, how could I refuse. My life has been blighted overshadowed, not my own and for what, where is my salary for what I do. Not a wage in sight. Discriminated CARER! Family carer, so you get a benefit that amounts to nothin, but yet outside care can demand £12 an hour. WHY? When a patient is awarded so much money "FOR CARE", why is the family carer not paid his due's. Why is he/she paid a benefit below minimum wage and yet the government allow it to go on.

Whilst fat cat Lawyers, Judges and Courts take their own fat cat fees and wages for their intervention but yet the carer is treated like shit on the end of their shoes! TRUE.

There's something wrong with the system. I calculate for my care over 14 years I am owed £12 per hour for at the very least 14 hours a day 365 days a year 14 years, work that out? £800,000! But if you were just recognised as a working person on minimum wage of £6 that alone would of been £400,000? Whilst other family have built up their worth in property I have not been able to. Its been a mission just trying to work out what I can sell or scrape together each year for an annual holiday but who really gives a shit?

Well I can tell you absolutely no one, accept the people who are in the same boat watching others steal from their relatives estates without transparency, only in secret, accounting to no-one but themselves.

IT HAS TO STOP! The UK government needs to address this with urgency. Someone, somewhere, someday will lose it, mind wise, and someone will die, probably from the pure frustrations that must be building in these people, listened to by no one and I mean no one, or caring about "THE CARERS". Probably because we are a small insignificant minority, but we are gathering strength.

An investigation into a complaint I made on the 4th February 2010 lasted 7 long months, what on earth is going on? I'm sure a murder investigation don't take that long! - Investigation completed the day after I published this statement read the 3 lines Then upon asking for a complete full copy of the investigation passed to legal department whom refused a copy on the grounds of section 40 of the data protection act protecting others.

If I had my time over again knowing what I know now I would have had to refuse my mothers request even though that would of broken my heart. It's took its toll on me over the years but I really blame the UK government for this not my mother whom with all her "so-called" lack of capacity seems to be fully intact to me of which I hold Clinical Neuropsycologists reports to confirm her capacity that have been largely ignored. One day I do believe someone will do something about it and stop this barbarrick inhumane treatment of the people whom CARE the most about the patients.

Back to top


Damages were awarded for the patients care but its that very standard of care that drops when families become involved because the system is that busy trying to stop famalies having any involvement with the care and money or at least them are the grounds they operate on yet in reality they are protecting their own long term fees whilst under that cover.

The carer whom is caring has no real access and no real say usually because other family whom are protecting their inheritance tend to side with the receivers or courts or worse won't get involved.

There was to my recollection, no money awarded for inheritance and there also was no money awarded for exorbitant fees and charges, so whats gone wrong with the system?

CARE and carers PAY was what the money was awarded for!

In our case one can take note that I personally did the first care of over 5 years before any money was awarded, living off benefits in a 1 bedroomed flat with me sleeping on a sofa! I sometimes think, and my mother the patient also agrees, I should sue her in the courts for back pay. I wonder?

Its ironic when we go out to a restaurant that the patient can order fillet steak but the carer can only afford beans on toast unless the patient issue's a handout. That's how its fealt for me over 15 years just living off handouts, no respect, no dignity, no nothing, treated like dirt when we should be rewarded better than the fat cat lawyers, judges & inheritance hunters etc.

I recently pointed out to the receiver HUGH JONES about the fact there is no wage and he said yes there is its paid in the account and I said its never been pointed out to me its a wage and if it ever was really a wage why has it not been taxed. Fiddling the state out of a tax paid wage I accused him off, with all the cuts that the government are making why are they not stopping carers from claiming benefits when high damages awards have been made to pay for care where that carer can then pay TAX! There has been a constant inbalance in the living standard of the patient to the carer whom as I pointed out that at the time of mums accident in 1995 I was living off an income of £1100 a week from one of my four businesses at that time which was all thrown away in the ensueing disaster in order to prioritise care for mum for free!.

So whats been the point in of it all salvaging the care of one life to ruin your own whilst FAT CAT lawyers and inheritence hunters all get the richer over time. Who is going to take notice of this corrupt system and the discriminatory inequalitys that are blatantly evident today in 2011 for private care damages that were awarded to pay for just that? CARERS! I recently complained to the EHRC The Equality and Human Rights helpline about this very matter and here you read their reply, "The issue that you have regarding care for your mother without payment is not likely to fall within the remit of the Equality Act. It appears that the fact that you are a relative means that you are not entitled to any of the payment award that your mother received to assist with her care.

This is not an equality issue and therefore, we cannot provide any further advice. " Now I ask you? does that not stink of discrimination and where I ask is the equality in that? Its obviously legal in the UK to discriminate against relative carers, no problem at all!

Manchester / Munby Judgement R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE L & ORS : R v MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL, EX PARTE R & ANOR (2001) QBD (Admin) (Munby J) 26/9/2001 LOCAL GOVERNMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - FAMILY LAW - HUMAN RIGHTS JUDICIAL REVIEW : FOSTER CARERS : RELATIVES : FRIENDS : SHORT TERM : LONG TERM : BOARDING-OUT ALLOWANCE : PAYMENTS : FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION : DEPENDENCY : S.8, S.17, S.22, S.23 AND S.26 CHILDREN ACT 1989 : ACCOMMODATION : PLACEMENTS : RESIDENCE ORDERS : LOOKED AFTER : LOCAL AUTHORITY : FOSTER PLACEMENT (CHILDREN) REGULATIONS 1991 SI 1991/;910 : FINANCIAL REPORTS : FOSTERING ALLOWANCES : NATIONAL FOSTER CARE ASSOCIATION : NFCA : FOSTER CARE FINANCE : FCF : CARE PROCEEDINGS : WEDNESBURY UNREASONABLENESS : IRRATIONALITY : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS 1950 : EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : ECHR : ART.8 : RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE : ART.14 : PROHIBITION OF DISCRIMINATION : LEGITIMATE AIMS : PRESSING SOCIAL NEED : PROPORTIONALITY : NECESSITY A local authority’s policy that financially discriminated against foster carers who were related to the children they fostered was unlawful. Two joined applications for judicial review of the respondent council’s policy to pay those short-term foster carers who were friends or relatives of a fostered child at a significantly lower rate than other foster carers. Both applications concerned children who were looked after within the meaning of ss.22 and 23 Children Act 1989. In the first application, the maternal grandparents of three children were the children’s long-term foster carers and the children remained with the grandparents after full care orders were made. In the second application, the children were placed with their older half-sister when full care orders were made after an independent social work assessment. The issue was the legality of the policy. The applicants submitted: (i) the council’s policy was a financial disincentive to family members being foster carers and used their sense of moral obligation to compel them to accept a grossly inadequate level of financial support which was lower than the level determined by the council as necessary for the maintenance of other foster children of like age; (ii) the policy was an attempt to apply financial pressure on family members to move away from local authority support; (iii) the policy was discriminatory within Art.14 European Convention on Human Rights and failed adequately to implement the council’s obligation to promote the right to respect for family life guaranteed by Art.8 of the Convention; (iv) the policy was an attempt to transfer the financial burden of looked-after children away from the council and was an abuse of the council’s dominant position in relation to foster parents and children; and (v) the policy excluded any flexibility to allow payment of the normal fostering allowances to relative foster carers in appropriate cases. HELD: (1) Section 23(2)(a) of the Act left the framework for providing for fostering allowances to the council’s discretion. That discretion had to be: (a) formulated and implemented to allow flexibility according to the needs of the individual children concerned; (b) exercised in light of the aim of the statutory framework without reliance on irrelevant considerations, without disregarding relevant principles, without being perverse and without conflicting with any duties within the framework; and (c) formulated and exercised to safeguard adequately the right to respect for family life in Art.8 of the Convention and to avoid discrimination in breach of Art.14 of the Convention. (2) The applicants’ submissions that imputed less than worthy motives to the council were not accepted. (3) The council’s policy was driven by the principle that it was undesirable to create a financial dependency on it if that would disincline a friend or relative to apply for a s.8 residence order. That was an entirely legitimate consideration and was entirely in accordance with the key principle in s.26(3) of the Act, namely that all appropriate steps should be taken to ensure that children were placed with their families as far as possible. (4) The council’s policy was unlawful for four reasons: (i) it imposed an arbitrary and inflexible cash limit on the amounts that could be paid to relative foster carers; (ii) it fixed the level of payments to relative foster carers at such a low level that there was an inevitable a conflict with the welfare principle and the council’s statutory duty; (iii) it was Wednesbury unreasonable; and (iv) it fundamentally discriminated against short-term relative foster carers and the children in their care. None of those objections were met by the legitimacy of the council’s objective. (5) The council’s obligation under both the Act and the Convention was to take all appropriate positive steps to ensure that children should live with their families. Differential treatment based on family relationships or which had an additional impact on family members could only be justified by counterbalancing factors of a compelling nature. If the council’s policy failed when tested against classic public law principles, it inevitably followed that it would fail to pass muster under the Convention. In any event, the policy failed to meet the key Convention tests of necessity and proportionality, thereby breaching Arts.8 and 14 of the Convention. Application allowed. Roger McCarthy QC instructed by Green & Co for the applicants. Ernest Ryder QC and Yvonne Coppel instructed by and for the council. LTL 26/10/2001 : (2002) 1 FLR 43 : (2002) ACD 284 : Times, December 10, 2001 Judgment: Approved subject to editorial corrections - 39 pages Document No.: AC0101975
Reference link
Solicitors link
Full Judgement link

Meet Michael on You Tube
click here

HE WHO CARES, SHOULD WIN, and eventually will! There's a saying in spain, "poco en poco", little by little.

Home is where the heart is and in 2011 this is our home

Great Grandson Jack

Thro all the family trauma a new addtion, JACK meets great grandma on 031010. The family get together at a pub for the afternoon was nothing short of a very tense situation.

My sister Angela wants to force her mother back to the UK to live at her house against her mothers consent and after failing to gain her consent and some very derrogatory exchange of texts published here, the following statements were made by the Angela CLAN.

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister Angela and my brother Kevin

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's husband David Platt

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Danielle Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah Jones

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my sister's daughter Sarah's, boyfriend Paul Collins

Received 150910 Read A statement made by my brother's wife Tracey Clarke

In defence of the above I and others made the following statements:-

Response 091010 Read A statement made by Michael 6 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend Cheryl Cavanagh 5 pages

Response 031010 Read A statement made by family friend of 35 years Stephen Power

Response 031010 Read A statement made by ex partner of 6 years Paul Moorby

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years David Owen-Scott

Response 220910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Jonathon Goulding

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Brenda Swain

Response 230910 Read A statement made by family friend of 3 years Margaret Davies 3 pages

golfing lunch 161210Out in golfers company for lunch mum wanted to sample some of what the golfers get up to.



Another brick in the wall

Michael Clarke
Halsburys Law states administrative courts unlawful.
The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is NO authority for administrative courts in this country and no Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.
The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year 2011, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body. The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts.
In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated. The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.
Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her. At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.
The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.
This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.
Like · · Share · Unfollow Post · 19 November at 14:15
Seen by 8 Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh, Peter Hofschröer and 2 others like this. ..
Tatiana Ladislas von Montegatz Michael Clarke could you please explain if this information could be referred to the Court of Protection and be used? 20 November at 03:58 via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke yes IT can but in practice the courts have an habit of ignoring you as in my case 20 November at 08:18 · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh fraud courts, corrupt system. Corrupt Queen who really don't care about us. More interested in donating money abroad but will watch her own people, elderly, disabled abused in this way and do nothing. 59 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 2 ..
Michael Clarke Absolute agreement on that 57 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh It's about time we had no Queen if she cannot do anything for her country or her people. What is she there for? For us to fund and pay her bills! 56 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke EXACTLY it is... SHE IS a waste of time and money 55 minutes ago · Like ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh So are MPs! what have they done for us victims? We are their constituents! They don't care about us! Waste of our money too! 52 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Also police what they are there for if they can't arrest criminals and can't deal with our cases. We do not need them if the corrupt pay them to not investigate, same with IPCC, Law Society, SRA, Ombudsmen, all waste of taxpeyers money. None do their jobs. A disgraceful country this is! 50 minutes ago via mobile · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke MY MP GORDON MARSDEN is a complete waste of space the number of run in s I ve had with him and that was just to get an appointment... he has done nothing he I believe is scared of the corrupt lot and prefers to sweep it under the carpet.... 47 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly same as me with my MP Robert Halfon. The abuse I had from his secretary just to get an appointment. First he was dealing with the case, then went silent, then wouldn't talk to me and I had abuse. He even ran to John Hemming MP to make false stories about me. Even sweep it under the carpet like they all do or more likely bribed by the corrupt! 40 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Whilst MPs are getting second homes, our homes and goods are being stolen. They don't care about us! 38 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke bribed by the corrupt! NOW THAT RINGS TRUE to me in every sense.... as time has gone on and on the more and more corrupt the entire state is uncovered... I've got to the stage where I NOW BELIEVE THERE IS NO JUSTICE ON OFFER. 38 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke there is only the OPTION OF REVOLUTION... 37 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SO I PERSONALLY have joined the anti government protesting and rallies groups associated with bringing down the state as the only option to us... these bastards need to pay the ultimate price for their GREED. 35 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh All victims are having the same problems with their MPs, not just you and me. They do nothing for any of us! How many more victims do we need for them to ever do anything?!! Therefore if our MPs can't do anything for you and me and other of their constituents. What are they there for? 34 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke THAT IS WHY I USED THE COMMERCIAL LIEN AGAINST OUR SOLICITORS PANNONES AND HUGH JONES... if it were not worth the paper its written on then why did they spend £70,000 on corrupt bent courts and bent barristers and bent judges to try and stop me with false harassment charges to gain fraudulent injunctions??? 30 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Michael Clarke The judicial system is out of CONTROL just like the identical GOVERNMENT with its BENT banking system built to rob and steal from the poor SLAVES... US! We got to put a stop to it all for the sake of CHILDREN. 27 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Exactly my suffering has paid for corrupt solicitors Amber Melville-Brown, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Lorna Skinner's lovely homes and many more corrupt ...See More 6 minutes ago via mobile · Edited · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke SOMETIME's you have got to fight fire with FIRE so in other words if they condone robbery, theft fraud and violence in the form of coercion to corrupt courts with forced prison, then it is only right fair and equal that this should be matched by equal forces i.e., VIOLENCE! 9 minutes ago · Like · 1 ..
Efi Anastasiou Goder-Marsh Agreed it's about time we took corrupt solicitors, judges and police homes and stole all their goods and see if nothing happens to us like them and for Law Society, SRA to see nothing is wrong & concluded at looking at all victims evidence 'they cannot see anything wrong, case closed, file closed on this matter' 3 minutes ago via mobile · Unlike · 1 ..
Michael Clarke

. 22 November 2013 at 16:12 Dear Mr. Alderman: The email exchange below is self-explanatory. If you were not aware of ACPO's Memorandum of Understanding with the Law Society, I shall be pleased to provide you with a copy of it. You may find it interesting to follow the internet links provided in the correspondence below. I can also provide you with information on fraud and corruption which has never been investigated by police. One reason for this (besides the agreement with the Law Society) is that, in some cases, police are party to racketeering or cover-ups, and another reason may be that police authorities are not staffed with personnel trained to a high enough standard in forensic accounting to be able to do the job of investigating white collar crime. For example, Greater Manchester Police - the second largest force in the UK - only has one officer trained and experienced enough to investigate white collar fraud. Obviously, serious organized crime affects all UN nations, and the UK is party to a legally binding UN convention to fight corruption. However, perhaps for the above reasons, this is not being done sufficiently, and therefore warrants serious and immediate attention. From what I have experienced, alleged responsiblity for crime, policing and justice in the UK seems to be spread across many ministries and ministers, and also be divided up among police, including ACPO, Sir Paul Stephenson, the Special Crime Unit, and various police authorities. When approached with the very serious matter of organized white collar crime, all parties refuse to investigate or intervene. Most just ignore the public and do not respond at all. I am wondering if the Serious Fraud Office, like the government itself, is dictated to by ACPO, and if it will therefore also refuse to investigate white collar crime and corruption? Referring a complainant back to their own police authority does not work because these authorities have already refused to log complaints of fraud, which is why complainants have attempted to escalate the matters - to no avail. There is absolutely nowhere that a person can go to get police to act. It is not possible to escalate the problem because there is absolutely no accountability by anyone in government. I am aware that an arrest of six solicitors was made recently, but there are many more involved in crimes such as fraudulent land title transfer, insurance fraud, and racketeering through the Court of Protection, and the Office of the Public Guardian, among other things. It is unfortunate that you are answerable to The Rt. Hon. Dominic Grieve, as he has never responded to these concerns at all. I wonder why the government is organized in such a way. Perhaps it is to spread the responsiblity so widely that nobody can be held accountable. This would seem to me to be the reason for it. The Rt. Hon. Nick Herbert talks about establishing a new Economic Crime Agency, but his department has written to say they will not intervene in individual cases, when they have already been advised of crime and corruption among police, and that nobody will investigate. Nobody can escalate a complaint to anyone as everything goes down a dead end street. There is absolutely no accountability by any public authority in the UK. At least, perhaps with Police Commissioners, someone will exert some authority over police and make them accountable to government and the people. There is a brick wall at every ministry and agency door in the UK, which is why there is now pressure on Europe to intervene. It would seem, from the press, that Europol will be involving themselves in British policing. It is unfortunate, but the country has brought it on itself by not adhering to the UN convention. Her Majesty's government is fragmented and not one person, with the exception of a handful of MPs and Lords shows any concern, or takes any action against the corruption that exists and is fostered among legal professionals, police, and the judiciary.. All are in denial. The Rt. Hon. Kenneth Clarke has been invited to ask for evidence of judicial corruption, and he does not. I wonder why. I don't know what the purpose of the British Prime Minister is. He should be taking the lead, instead of hobnobbing with media monopoly players. Nobody has any accountability to anyone. No doubt it won't be long before the British join Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt, Yemen, and the rest, and take to the streets. The British have become a seriously oppressed nation because of all the do-nothings in government. It is no wonder that the government has been buying riot gear for the military. Perhaps they are expecting the Storming of the Bastille. I look forward to receiving your comments, and your request for information on the crimes and corruption. Yours sincerely, Bernard Jenkin, MP Public Administration Committee Westminster, UK Dear Mr Jenkin As you can see from the information following this email, I have been alerting authorities since at least 2011 about the police's fraudulent crime figures. Heaven knows how long others have been alerting them. You will also find reference to police fudging figures in two new books by ex police officer, Stephen Hayes: XD0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1385045105&sr=8-1&keywords=fifty+shades+of+black+ %27n+blue Jil Matheson is the National Statistician. I believe she has been concerned since I advised her, but nothing has been done by government, with the exception of your own efforts, despite the matter being mentioned in parliament, and despite there also being several newspaper articles about police dereliction of duty since 2011, indicating that police only selectively investigate reported crimes, and most often refuse to record them and issue a crime log number. The financial bonus culture for any public servant makes Britain a laughing stock, but it is worse, when we think that it takes place within police. ACPO is behind all of this nonsense, and is a self-serving old boys' club that should be disbanded. Why on earth would the government not broaden the scope of HM Inspector of Constabularies? Wouldn't that be the most logical move? Obviously, something smells rotten. You should be aware of the fact that many MPs, including those on select committees, are deleting emails from the public, which are respectful and contain intelligence, WITHOUT READING THEM. They are doing it to many, many people, and Ministers are doing it too. It is every bit as serious a corruption problem as police ignoring reports of crime. I know of two people who have tried to report MURDERS and are being ignored by West Yorkshire Police - one of the worst police forces in the country for alleged corruption. They have approached oversight bodies and central government, and are similarly ignored. They have been fighting for justice in the matter for many years. May I emphasise that there are thousands of Britons who have been fighting for justice and police investigations into serious crimes, most notably sophisticated white collar, and yet both police and government ministers ignore them. We have reached the conclusion that police and government are part of the organised crime ring. What other conclusion would a person draw? Something is seriously wrong and, if Mr. Maude is concerned about public servants giving service, he should first examine who is blocking and deleting emails throughout government and public service, and under whose authority they are doing so. The problem of MPs and ministers deleting emails without reading them has been reported to select committees but, unfortunately, several select committee members, including Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge, are culprits themselves. The Public Accounts committee has acknowledged the concern but has no intention of doing anything about it, despite the fact that the culprits obviously do not represent good value for money for the British taxpayer. Perhaps we should have drawn this matter to your attention? Actually, I think some of us may have. The situation involving officials ignoring intelligence (particularly about organised crime) from the public is so bad that concerned citizens now broadcast this matter widely to officials in Europe and beyond, because it is corruption, and this corruption belies the fact that the UK is signatory to international conventions against transnational serious organised crime and against corruption. We feel that many MPs and ministers are fraudulently holding office, when they simply either block emails from the public or delete them without reading them, besides which they do nothing about the problems, even after reading the emails. Mr. Cameron and Mr. Clegg obviously couldn't care less, and it will be their undoing. Theresa May is even worse. The people have had enough. Britain is the weak link in international crime fighting. As you know, police had received information from Toronto Police eighteen months ago regarding Operation Spade, and did nothing with it. No arrests were made in the UK. Britain let the team down, as usual. Britain does not deserve to be a G20 or G8 member, and Kenneth Clarke is surely only jokingly be called the "Anti-Corruption Champion", as we have not seen any action from him ever. In fact, he has been part of the problem. As you can see, police also have an agreement NOT TO INVESTIGATE lawyers. It is shocking that this Memorandum of Agreement could ever have been set up. Please keep up the good work. It looks like you are the only one in the UK with any intelligence to realise how police are supporting serious transnational organised crime by their failure to record and investigate reports. I should also point out that many victims have presented their cases in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and yet nobody has taken any action to help them. This can only be due to institutionalised corruption on a grand scale and, until some action is taken to help these people, then we will continue to believe this. Yours sincerely, ATTENTION: MS. JIL MATHESON - REGARDING INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF CRIME STATISTICS Ms. Jil Matheson UK Statistics Authority Statistics House Tredegar Park Newport South Wales NP10 8XG Dear Ms. Matheson: I was interested to read in the newspaper that you will be working with ACPO and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary on an independent review of national crime statistics. You may be interested to know that, as a result of the attached Memorandum of Understanding between ACPO and the Law Society, white collar crimes involving members of the legal profession are never logged or investigated by police. As you can see, the Memorandum of Understanding is an agreement between two private, non-governmental organizations to obstruct justice. National crime statistics, therefore, can never be accurate; they never were, and never will be, unless police start recording incidents. This state of affairs is a national shame. As a result, I understand that Europe is about to step in and do Britain's policing for them. probe-UK-crime Police have openly refused, and continue to refuse, to investigage fraud, perjury or forgery, if a legal professional is involved, telling the general public that it is a civil matter. If you have a moment to watch this video, you will hear a policeman telling the gentleman that fraud is a civil matter. This is standard practice. Complaints from the public are simply ignored. No action is taken, not even a report. Of course, fraud. perjury and forgery are crimes the world over, except if they take place in the UK and involve a legal professional. One must remember that most complex white collar crime involves a legal professional......and yet it goes unreported because police will not log the crimes, much less investigate them. There are currently hundreds, if not thousands, of victims of white collar crime up and down the country, whose cases have never been logged or investigated by police. Personally, I can attest to the fact that Lancashire police have refused me, nine times to date, a log or incident number, so that I may report a crime. The refusal includes a member of the Professional Standards Branch. Not one officer has ever asked me what crime I wish to report. It could be a murder; it could be anything. However, I believe that they are afraid because I have knowledge of corruption in that constabulary, which is why they refuse to take my report. I will gladly supply the details to anyone who might feel it is their duty to act. The Home Office has already said that they don't want to involve themselves, so I can only think that, as Mr. Cameron doesn't show any interest either, nobody in the UK cares. So crimes in the UK are going unreported and uninvestigated; therefore, your statistics will always be flawed. Your review is a complete waste of government money and effort because, as long as ACPO continues to run the country with its corrupt hidden agenda, and its Memorandae of Understanding with whomever it sees fit, reports will be a complete sham. You don't have, and will never have, true statistics. Crimes committed by the police are never logged, and there are many cases of police harrassment and brutality, such as that of South Wales Police continually harrassing Mr. Maurice Kirk, and Lancashire Constabulary continually harrassing Ms. Carol Woods - no log numbers for either issues - just police harrassment in a very serious and ongoing manner, including imprisonment without due process, and attempts to section these individuals under the Mental Health Act. I would be delighted to supply information so that the government might investigate, but it appears that it does not feel it has any authority over ACPO. It seems that ACPO runs the whole country, including the Home Office, which seems to condones everything they do, and which says it has no authority to invervene in any matters whatsoever. I always thought the Prime Minister would have some power if he should choose to use it. Baroness Neville-Jones offers no apology for the attached Memorandum of Understanding, and simply stated, while addressing the House of Commons, that the Memorandum of Understanding was decommissioned in 2007.