From:                                         mike:clarke www.opg.me <mike@rake.net>

Sent:                                           24 September 2017 08:58

To:                                               'Kelly, Ged'

Cc:                                               'len lawrence'; 'Susan.Acland-Hood@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk'

Subject:                                     RE: GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

Attachments:                          Fee-Void-abinitio2.pdf

 

FAO GED: KELLY RESPONSE to your email in yellow

Copied to COURTS CEO Susan: Acland-Hood

 

From: Kelly, Ged [mailto:ged.kelly@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 22 September 2017 12:27
To: 'mike:clarke www.opg.me'
Subject: RE: GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

“Mr Clarke, I can only repeat what I have already stated”.

THIS is the problem, THAT is at the root of the FRAUD on and in the court in which you sit as an administrative officer.

REPEATING yourself is something that is just a game to you, conducting yourself with the sataniic evil  that is the core protective structure of the fraudulent court.

1.       AS court administration, upon looking up the full description, ‘relating to the running of a business, organization, etc’. CEO Susan:Acland-Hood

"Administrative problems", is your duty as a public servant, I hence underline the PUBLIC SERVANT, is to assist with the running of the said business.

How much assistance do you think you are providing by repeating yourself??

It is clear from the very outset the only assistance you are providing is to protect your criminal gang within that court by actually NOT ASSISTING but instead REPEATING yourself causing endless exchanges of pointless emails or recorded delivery paperwork.

 

Let me be so generous as to try and point you in the right administrative direction to do your job.

1.       You could ease administration by passing the notice to the relevant COURT MANAGER!

2.       You could advise the COURT MANAGER that you have informed me of his/her name and that it has been served upon him/her!

3.       You could confirm back to me that it has been passed to Mr or Mrs ??????x and this admin process is complete by your own public duty!

 

“I am Court administrative staff, I have no Judicial function, and I do not make orders”.

You are part and parcel to a business and courts are in fact BUSINESSES registered to make profit, FACT. Check with your CEO Susan

Being a part of that enterprise which you are, makes you vicariously liable, a term I’m sure you are familiar with, as such by repeating yourself and not doing your public administrative duty  actually attaches yourself to the ongoing frauds because you are failing to administer what is being conveyed thereby becoming part of the FRAUD vicariously.

As long as you fail in your public duty THE NOTICE stands with your name on it. Instead of protecting your manager and trying to deflect it back to me placing your own head above the parapit, put your court managers head, clearly on the line, as is your public duty!

 

“As previously advised, any direction you seek from the Court should be sought by way of application to the Judge, paying the requisite fee”.

JUDGES IN THIS CASE ARE BENT - There are no fees to be paid where FRAUD in and on the court are the subject matter, a matter I’m sure your well aware of.

This statement again as an administrative officer serving THE BUSINESS and not the public which just demonstrates how THE so called court has become a profiteering racket to extract cash from the unsuspecting public by any false fraudulent means.

 

“In addition I would draw your attention to my email signature, which should disabuse you of the notion that I am the Court manager”.

As said above and now I’m repeating myself, YOU are a PUBLIC SERVANT, in other words, you serve me, not your business racketeering bosses.

Your email signature as an Administrative Officer does not take away your vicarious liability in assisting FRAUD on and in the court.

Perhaps this matter should now disabuse you of the notion that you have NO LIABILITY, when clearly YOU HAVE!     

 

Man, mike:clarke mike@rake.net www.opg.me

Ged Kelly

Administrative Officer

County Court at Manchester

0161 240 5240

(Telephone hunt group 0161 240 5329)

Documents are to be sent via one method only, as set out in Practice Direction 5A and 5B of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Manchester Civil Justice Centre receives in excess of 100 duplicated documents each week, wasting staff time and resources, and thereafter increasing the processing time for all work. Remember, send your documents once only.

Please ensure that any attachments for the County Court at Manchester are formatted as follows:

a) case number;

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate);

c) imminent hearing dates & times;

d) subject matter;

e.g. C03MA123 Smith v Jones hearing 23 June 2016 @ 10.00am – witness statement

e) all attachments to be named as a) - d) above.


From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 21 September 2017 09:23
To: Kelly, Ged
Cc: 'len lawrence'
Subject: FW: GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

By email and recorded

Attached proof of FEE – NOTICE

Published www.opg.me

 

From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 14 September 2017 12:05
To: 'Kelly, Ged'
Subject: GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Dear Ged

Under SAR rules the freedom of info request is supposed to make contact with the requestor to confirm they are collating data.

I have heard nothing.

What is the direct email for the person/s dealing with it?

Mike:clarke

 

From: Kelly, Ged [mailto:ged.kelly@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 06 September 2017 11:48
To: 'mike@rake.net'
Subject: RE: NOTICE TO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Mr Clarke, I have no Judicial function. Any direction you seek from the Court should be sought by way of application to the Judge, paying the requisite fee.

 

Ged Kelly

Administrative Officer

County Court at Manchester

0161 240 5240

(Telephone hunt group 0161 240 5329)

Documents are to be sent via one method only, as set out in Practice Direction 5A and 5B of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Manchester Civil Justice Centre receives in excess of 100 duplicated documents each week, wasting staff time and resources, and thereafter increasing the processing time for all work. Remember, send your documents once only.

Please ensure that any attachments for the County Court at Manchester are formatted as follows:

a) case number;

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate);

c) imminent hearing dates & times;

d) subject matter;

e.g. C03MA123 Smith v Jones hearing 23 June 2016 @ 10.00am – witness statement

e) all attachments to be named as a) - d) above.


From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 05 September 2017 17:09
To: ManchesterCivil
Subject: ref: NOTICE TO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Ged:Kelly

 

i man, as the sole principal secured party creditor to the cestui que vie account MICHAEL RAYMOND CLARKE I am entitled to administrative processes that you appear to be wilfully denying access.

 

You appear to be evading the notice posted upon you & you alone, attached again, that is a separate issue to the one being dealt with by FOI team.

 

AGAIN i attach the notice imploring you not to evade it, providing an administrative response, by way of an administrative order stating both cases and subsequent orders, void.

 

Man

Mike:

 

From: ManchesterCivil [mailto:manchestercivil@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 05 September 2017 16:53
To: 'mike:clarke www.opg.me'
Subject: RE: NOTICE FAO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Mr Clarke, as previously advised, this matter is being dealt with by our Freedom of Information team. They will respond to you in due course; please direct any future correspondence in return to them.

 

Ged Kelly

Administrative Officer

County Court at Manchester

0161 240 5240

(Telephone hunt group 0161 240 5329)

Documents are to be sent via one method only, as set out in Practice Direction 5A and 5B of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Manchester Civil Justice Centre receives in excess of 100 duplicated documents each week, wasting staff time and resources, and thereafter increasing the processing time for all work. Remember, send your documents once only.

Please ensure that any attachments for the County Court at Manchester are formatted as follows:

a) case number;

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate);

c) imminent hearing dates & times;

d) subject matter;

e.g. C03MA123 Smith v Jones hearing 23 June 2016 @ 10.00am – witness statement

e) all attachments to be named as a) - d) above.


From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 05 September 2017 15:40
To: ManchesterCivil
Subject: FW: NOTICE FAO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Dear Ged:Kelly

Cases 2MA91155 + 2MA90015

REF NOTICE FAO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

Attached or below linked and published on www.opg.me is the receipt for recorded delivery of the notice, SERVED 31/08/2017, again attached

that i man await an adminstrative response to, as principal secured party creditor and executor/beneficiary of the said cestui que vie account,

MICHAEL RAYMOND CLARKE

 

This matter is extremely serious and your response or lack of, will determine your involvement to IDENTITY fraud!

I implore you to act with integrity. THIS is an administrative matter and NOT a JUDICIAL ONE

 

Man, mike@rake.net

 

 

From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 29 August 2017 16:17
To: 'ManchesterCivil'
Subject: NOTICE FAO GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

CASES 2MA90015 + 2MA91155

Thank you ged: kelly for the information below

I attach here a NOTICE for your attention that IS URGENT

It also has been published and linked here: - http://opg.me/manNOTICEtocourt28082017.pdf

 

From: ManchesterCivil [mailto:manchestercivil@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 29 August 2017 10:31
To: 'mike:clarke www.opg.me'
Subject: RE: FAO MoJ & GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Mr Clarke, to keep you updated, this matter is now being dealt with by our Freedom Of Information clerks; you will be hearing from them soon.

 

Ged Kelly

Administrative Officer

County Court at Manchester

0161 240 5240

(Telephone hunt group 0161 240 5329)

Documents are to be sent via one method only, as set out in Practice Direction 5A and 5B of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Manchester Civil Justice Centre receives in excess of 100 duplicated documents each week, wasting staff time and resources, and thereafter increasing the processing time for all work. Remember, send your documents once only.

Please ensure that any attachments for the County Court at Manchester are formatted as follows:

a) case number;

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate);

c) imminent hearing dates & times;

d) subject matter;

e.g. C03MA123 Smith v Jones hearing 23 June 2016 @ 10.00am – witness statement

e) all attachments to be named as a) - d) above.


From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 25 August 2017 12:16
To: ManchesterCivil
Subject: FW: FAO MoJ & GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

Sorry forgot to add your form

 

From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 25 August 2017 09:58
To: 'ManchesterCivil'
Cc: 'data.access@justice.gsi.gov.uk'
Subject: FAO MoJ & GED KELLY Admin Officer Manchester Courts

 

FAO GED KELLY cc’d Ministry of justice

Thank you for your prompt and informative reply.

Re ADMINISTRATIVE officer SAR subject access request

 

Attached formal notice

Regarding

 

a) case numbers; 2MA90015 & 2MA91155

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate); PANNONE HUGH JONES v CLARKE & CHARLES TATTUM PANNONE v CLARKE

c) hearing dates & times; the very beginning please ALL dates and ALL times concerning ALL Judges SHARP-FOSKITT-PELLING-JACKSON-SWIFT-HOVINGTON

d) subject matter; both CASEMAN files computorised version inclusive of court fee proof of payment

e] ALL the judges notes for every JUDGE involved in the case from the beginning of both cases under the case precedent set of

 https://www.theguardian.com/law/2017/jul/07/judge-handwritten-notes-released-uk-data-laws-first-time and attached SAR [PELLING+JACKSON reported to ICO]

 

man

mike:clarke

07763906847

Mike@rake.net

Published www.opg.me

 

From: ManchesterCivil [mailto:manchestercivil@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk]
Sent: 24 August 2017 18:35
To: 'mike@rake.net'
Subject: FW: fao COURT MANAGER

 

Mr Clarke, your request of “a copy of the computerised Court records” does not tell us exactly which documents you are seeking. Please complete the attached form to enable Court staff to obtain the required copies and assess the required copying fee.

 

Ged Kelly

Administrative Officer

County Court at Manchester

0161 240 5240

(Telephone hunt group 0161 240 5329)

Documents are to be sent via one method only, as set out in Practice Direction 5A and 5B of the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Manchester Civil Justice Centre receives in excess of 100 duplicated documents each week, wasting staff time and resources, and thereafter increasing the processing time for all work. Remember, send your documents once only.

Please ensure that any attachments for the County Court at Manchester are formatted as follows:

a) case number;

b) party names (abbreviated where appropriate);

c) imminent hearing dates & times;

d) subject matter;

e.g. C03MA123 Smith v Jones hearing 23 June 2016 @ 10.00am – witness statement

e) all attachments to be named as a) - d) above.


From: mike:clarke www.opg.me [mailto:mike@rake.net]
Sent: 17 August 2017 09:01
To: chester county, civil
Subject: fao COURT MANAGER

cid:image001.jpg@01D31D7F.D4E3B020


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit
http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of
the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying
is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all
copies and inform the sender by return e-mail.

Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message
could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in
mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message
by e-mail.

This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be
monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail
monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be
read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not
broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.